prenatal care

产前护理
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:超过四分之一的德国人口具有移民背景(MB)。正如医疗保健行业的各种研究已经表明的那样,种族背景和迁移状况可能会影响个体患者的护理。我们研究的目的是评估在产前护理的背景下,利用自付医疗服务和咨询情况是否存在差异,考虑到迁移状态,文化适应和社会人口统计学方面。
    方法:在01.03.21-01.03.22期间,在大学妇女医院Ulm进行的一项回顾性调查中,使用翻译成9种语言的标准化问卷对共511名婴儿进行了访谈,并询问了他们的产前护理。由于COVID大流行,该研究必须在一年后终止.
    结果:与没有MB的妇女相比,有MB的妇女,特别是第一代移民妇女,使用的自付产前护理服务明显减少(p<0.001),并且对可能的产前护理检查的成本和收益了解和咨询较少(p<0.001)。与这些结果一致,MB患者的同化指数(AI)与个体医疗服务的利用和感知之间存在关联.
    结论:我们的研究表明,即使在今天,有和没有MB的妇女在产前护理的背景下,对各种卫生服务的治疗和看法仍然存在差异。
    OBJECTIVE: More than a quarter of the German population has a migration background (MB). As various studies in the healthcare sector have already shown, ethnic background and migration status can have an influence on individual patient care. The aim of our study was to evaluate whether there are differences in utilization of out of pocket health-care services and the consultation situation in the context of prenatal care, taking into account migration status, acculturation and socio-demographic aspects.
    METHODS: In the period from 01.03.21-01.03.22, a total of 511 women in childbed at the University Women\'s Hospital Ulm were interviewed in a retrospective survey using a standardized questionnaire translated into 9 languages and asked about their prenatal care. Due to the COVID pandemic, the study had to be terminated after one year.
    RESULTS: Women with MB-particularly 1st generation migrant women-used significantly fewer out of pocket prenatal care services (p < 0.001) and felt less informed and counselled regarding costs and benefits of possible prenatal care examinations (p < 0.001) compared to women without MB. Consistent with these results, there were associations between the assimilation index (AI) of patients with MB and both utilization and perception of individual healthcare services.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that even today there are still differences in the treatment and perception of various health services in the context of prenatal care between women with and those without MB.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:产前酒精暴露(PAE)是可预防发育障碍的主要原因之一。缺乏客观的筛选方法导致对该现象的认识不足。磷脂酰乙醇(PEth)是一种特定的乙醇生物标志物,可在使用酒精后几周内显示酒精摄入量。到目前为止,PEth主要是检测中度和重度饮酒的工具。随着PEth截止值的降低,即使是轻微的产前饮酒也是可能的。我们的目的是找出PEth分析的敏感方法是否可以提供有关PAE的其他信息,并评估产前筛查中酒精阳性结果的临界值。
    方法:该研究是对2023年6月至9月从赫尔辛基大学医院诊断中心收集的3000份匿名血液样本的观察性研究。作为产前血液筛查计划的一部分,芬兰红十字会血液服务中心最初收到了用于血型分型和抗体筛查的样本。从全血中提取PEth后,我们使用超高效液相色谱串联质谱(UHPLC-MS/MS)设备开发了一种灵敏的PEth16:0/18:1分析方法。定量的下限为lng/mL。
    结果:5.2%的病例中PEth≥2ng/mL,2.0%时≥8ng/mL,在1.0%时≥20ng/mL。PEth的检测时间可以是几个星期,尤其是低PEth浓度和大量饮酒后。目前尚不清楚PEth测试阳性是由于怀孕期间或怀孕前故意饮酒所致。
    结论:我们建议在常规产前血液筛查计划中增加Peth16:0/18:1,截止值为2ng/mL,在阳性病例中,在2-4周内进行临床评估和重新测试。在临床环境中,有关孕周和孕前饮酒的信息是相关的,在解释低PEth浓度时需要考虑.
    BACKGROUND: Prenatal alcohol exposure (PAE) is one of the leading causes of preventable developmental disabilities. A lack of objective screening methods results in an under-recognition of the phenomenon. Phosphatidylethanol (PEth) is a specific ethanol biomarker that reveals alcohol intake up to several weeks after alcohol use. So far, PEth has mostly been a tool for detecting moderate and heavy drinking. With lower PEth cut-offs, revealing even minor prenatal alcohol consumption is possible. We aimed to find out if a sensitive method for PEth analysis would give additional information about PAE and to assess the cut-off value for a positive alcohol result in prenatal screening.
    METHODS: The study was an observational study of 3000 anonymous blood samples collected from the Helsinki University Hospital Diagnostic Center between June and September 2023. The Finnish Red Cross Blood Service received the samples originally for blood group typing and antibody screening as part of the prenatal blood screening program. We developed a sensitive PEth 16:0/18:1 analysis method using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS) equipment after liquid-liquid extraction of PEth from whole blood. The lower limit of quantification was 1 ng/mL.
    RESULTS: PEth was ≥2 ng/mL in 5.2% of the cases, ≥8 ng/mL in 2.0%, and ≥20 ng/mL in 1.0%. The detection time of PEth can be several weeks, especially with low PEth concentrations and after heavy alcohol consumption. It remained unknown whether the positive PEth tests resulted from drinking deliberately during pregnancy or before pregnancy recognition.
    CONCLUSIONS: We suggest adding PEth 16:0/18:1 to a routine prenatal blood screening program with a cut-off of 2 ng/mL-and in positive cases, clinical evaluation and retesting in 2-4 weeks. In clinical settings, information on gestational week and alcohol consumption before pregnancy is relevant and needs to be considered when interpreting low PEth concentrations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:建议在妊娠期补充铁和叶酸以预防贫血,并可能改善其他产妇,怀孕,和婴儿结局。
    目的:研究孕期每日口服补铁的效果,单独或与叶酸或其他维生素和矿物质联合使用,作为产前保健的干预措施。
    方法:我们于2024年1月18日检索了Cochrane妊娠和分娩试验登记处(包括CENTRAL,MEDLINE,Embase,CINAHL,ClinicalTrials.gov,世卫组织国际临床试验注册平台,会议记录),并搜索了检索到的研究的参考列表。
    方法:评估口服补铁效果的随机或准随机试验,铁+叶酸,或铁+怀孕期间的其他维生素和矿物质。
    方法:综述作者独立评估试验资格,根据预定义的标准确定可信度,评估的偏见风险,提取的数据,并进行了准确性检查。我们使用GRADE方法来评估主要结局证据的确定性。我们预计试验之间的异质性很高;我们使用随机效应模型(平均治疗效果)汇总了试验结果。
    结果:我们纳入了57项试验,涉及48,971名女性。共有40项试验比较了每日口服补铁与安慰剂或不含铁的效果;8项试验评估了铁+叶酸与安慰剂或不含铁+叶酸的效果。与安慰剂或无铁相比,补充铁母体结局:怀孕期间补充铁可以减少母体贫血(4.0%对7.4%;风险比(RR)0.30,95%置信区间(CI)0.20至0.47;14项试验,13,543名女性;低确定性证据)和足月铁缺乏症(44.0%对66.0%;RR0.51,95%CI0.38至0.68;8项试验,2873名妇女;低确定性证据),并可能减少产妇足月缺铁性贫血(5.0%对18.4%;RR0.41,95%CI0.26至0.63;7项试验,2704名妇女;中度确定性证据),与安慰剂或不补充铁相比。产妇死亡可能几乎没有差异(2和4个事件,RR0.57,95%CI0.12至2.69;3项试验,14060名妇女;中度确定性证据)。不良反应的证据非常不确定(21.6%对18.0%;RR1.29,95%CI0.83至2.02;12项试验,2423名女性;非常低的确定性证据)和严重贫血(Hb<70g/L)在孕中期/晚期(<1%对3.6%;RR0.22,95%CI0.01至3.20;8项试验,1398名妇女;非常低的确定性证据)。没有临床试验报告临床疟疾或怀孕期间感染。婴儿结局:服用铁补充剂的女性可能不太可能有低出生体重的婴儿(5.2%对6.1%;RR0.84,95%CI0.72至0.99;12项试验,18,290名婴儿;中度确定性证据),与安慰剂或不补充铁相比。然而,婴儿出生体重的证据非常不确定(MD24.9克,95%CI-125.81至175.60;16项试验,18,554名婴儿;非常低的确定性证据)。早产可能几乎没有差异(7.6%对8.2%;RR0.93,95%CI0.84至1.02;11项试验,18,827名婴儿;中度确定性证据),新生儿死亡可能几乎没有差异(1.4%对1.5%,RR0.98,95%CI0.77至1.24;4项试验,17,243名婴儿;低确定性证据)或先天性异常,包括神经管缺陷(41对48例事件;RR0.88,95%CI0.58至1.33;4项试验,14,377名婴儿;低确定性证据)。与安慰剂或无铁+叶酸相比,铁+叶酸补充剂产妇结局:每日口服铁+叶酸补充剂可能减少足月产妇贫血(12.1%对25.5%;RR0.44,95%CI0.30至0.64;4项试验,1962年妇女;中度确定性证据),并且可以减少孕妇足月铁缺乏(3.6%对15%;RR0.24,95%CI0.06至0.99;1项试验,131名妇女;低确定性证据),与安慰剂或不含铁+叶酸相比。关于铁+叶酸对产妇缺铁性贫血的影响的证据非常不确定(10.8%对25%;RR0.43,95%CI0.17至1.09;1项试验,131名女性;非常低的确定性证据),或孕产妇死亡(无事件;1项试验;非常低的确定性证据)。不良反应的证据不确定(21.0%对0.0%;RR44.32,95%CI2.77至709.09;1项试验,456名妇女;低确定性证据),妊娠中期或晚期严重贫血的证据非常不确定(<1%对5.6%;RR0.12,95%CI0.02至0.63;4项试验,506名女性;非常低的确定性证据),与安慰剂或不含铁+叶酸相比。婴儿结局:婴儿低出生体重可能几乎没有差异(33.4%对40.2%;RR1.07,95%CI0.31至3.74;2项试验,1311名婴儿;低确定性证据),比较补充铁+叶酸与安慰剂或不补充铁+叶酸。怀孕期间接受铁+叶酸的女性所生的婴儿出生体重可能较高(MD57.73g,95%CI7.66至107.79;2项试验,1365名婴儿;中度确定性证据),与安慰剂或不含铁+叶酸相比。其他婴儿结局可能几乎没有差异,包括早产(19.4%对19.2%;RR1.55,95%CI0.40至6.00;3项试验,1497名婴儿;低确定性证据),新生儿死亡(3.4%对4.2%;RR0.81,95%CI0.51至1.30;1项试验,1793名婴儿;低确定性证据),或先天性异常(1.7%对2.4;RR0.70,95%CI0.35至1.40;1项试验,1652名婴儿;低确定性证据),比较补充铁+叶酸与安慰剂或不补充铁+叶酸。在疟疾流行国家共进行了19项试验,或者在有疟疾风险的环境中。没有研究报告母体临床疟疾;一项研究报告了胎盘疟疾的数据。
    结论:孕期每日口服补铁可以减少孕妇足月贫血和铁缺乏。对于其他母婴结局,组间几乎没有差异,或者证据不确定.未来的研究需要检查铁补充剂对其他母婴健康结果的影响,包括婴儿铁状态,增长,和发展。
    BACKGROUND: Iron and folic acid supplementation have been recommended in pregnancy for anaemia prevention, and may improve other maternal, pregnancy, and infant outcomes.
    OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of daily oral iron supplementation during pregnancy, either alone or in combination with folic acid or with other vitamins and minerals, as an intervention in antenatal care.
    METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Trials Registry on 18 January 2024 (including CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO\'s International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, conference proceedings), and searched reference lists of retrieved studies.
    METHODS: Randomised or quasi-randomised trials that evaluated the effects of oral supplementation with daily iron, iron + folic acid, or iron + other vitamins and minerals during pregnancy were included.
    METHODS: Review authors independently assessed trial eligibility, ascertained trustworthiness based on pre-defined criteria, assessed risk of bias, extracted data, and conducted checks for accuracy. We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of the evidence for primary outcomes. We anticipated high heterogeneity amongst trials; we pooled trial results using a random-effects model (average treatment effect).
    RESULTS: We included 57 trials involving 48,971 women. A total of 40 trials compared the effects of daily oral supplements with iron to placebo or no iron; eight trials evaluated the effects of iron + folic acid compared to placebo or no iron + folic acid. Iron supplementation compared to placebo or no iron Maternal outcomes: Iron supplementation during pregnancy may reduce maternal anaemia (4.0% versus 7.4%; risk ratio (RR) 0.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.20 to 0.47; 14 trials, 13,543 women; low-certainty evidence) and iron deficiency at term (44.0% versus 66.0%; RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.68; 8 trials, 2873 women; low-certainty evidence), and probably reduces maternal iron-deficiency anaemia at term (5.0% versus 18.4%; RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.63; 7 trials, 2704 women; moderate-certainty evidence), compared to placebo or no iron supplementation. There is probably little to no difference in maternal death (2 versus 4 events, RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.12 to 2.69; 3 trials, 14,060 women; moderate-certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain for adverse effects (21.6% versus 18.0%; RR 1.29, 95% CI 0.83 to 2.02; 12 trials, 2423 women; very low-certainty evidence) and severe anaemia (Hb < 70 g/L) in the second/third trimester (< 1% versus 3.6%; RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.01 to 3.20; 8 trials, 1398 women; very low-certainty evidence). No trials reported clinical malaria or infection during pregnancy. Infant outcomes: Women taking iron supplements are probably less likely to have infants with low birthweight (5.2% versus 6.1%; RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.99; 12 trials, 18,290 infants; moderate-certainty evidence), compared to placebo or no iron supplementation. However, the evidence is very uncertain for infant birthweight (MD 24.9 g, 95% CI -125.81 to 175.60; 16 trials, 18,554 infants; very low-certainty evidence). There is probably little to no difference in preterm birth (7.6% versus 8.2%; RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.02; 11 trials, 18,827 infants; moderate-certainty evidence) and there may be little to no difference in neonatal death (1.4% versus 1.5%, RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.24; 4 trials, 17,243 infants; low-certainty evidence) or congenital anomalies, including neural tube defects (41 versus 48 events; RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.33; 4 trials, 14,377 infants; low-certainty evidence). Iron + folic supplementation compared to placebo or no iron + folic acid Maternal outcomes: Daily oral supplementation with iron + folic acid probably reduces maternal anaemia at term (12.1% versus 25.5%; RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.64; 4 trials, 1962 women; moderate-certainty evidence), and may reduce maternal iron deficiency at term (3.6% versus 15%; RR 0.24, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.99; 1 trial, 131 women; low-certainty evidence), compared to placebo or no iron + folic acid. The evidence is very uncertain about the effects of iron + folic acid on maternal iron-deficiency anaemia (10.8% versus 25%; RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.17 to 1.09; 1 trial, 131 women; very low-certainty evidence), or maternal deaths (no events; 1 trial; very low-certainty evidence). The evidence is uncertain for adverse effects (21.0% versus 0.0%; RR 44.32, 95% CI 2.77 to 709.09; 1 trial, 456 women; low-certainty evidence), and the evidence is very uncertain for severe anaemia in the second or third trimester (< 1% versus 5.6%; RR 0.12, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.63; 4 trials, 506 women; very low-certainty evidence), compared to placebo or no iron + folic acid. Infant outcomes: There may be little to no difference in infant low birthweight (33.4% versus 40.2%; RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.31 to 3.74; 2 trials, 1311 infants; low-certainty evidence), comparing iron + folic acid supplementation to placebo or no iron + folic acid. Infants born to women who received iron + folic acid during pregnancy probably had higher birthweight (MD 57.73 g, 95% CI 7.66 to 107.79; 2 trials, 1365 infants; moderate-certainty evidence), compared to placebo or no iron + folic acid. There may be little to no difference in other infant outcomes, including preterm birth (19.4% versus 19.2%; RR 1.55, 95% CI 0.40 to 6.00; 3 trials, 1497 infants; low-certainty evidence), neonatal death (3.4% versus 4.2%; RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.30; 1 trial, 1793 infants; low-certainty evidence), or congenital anomalies (1.7% versus 2.4; RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.40; 1 trial, 1652 infants; low-certainty evidence), comparing iron + folic acid supplementation to placebo or no iron + folic acid. A total of 19 trials were conducted in malaria-endemic countries, or in settings with some malaria risk. No studies reported maternal clinical malaria; one study reported data on placental malaria.
    CONCLUSIONS: Daily oral iron supplementation during pregnancy may reduce maternal anaemia and iron deficiency at term. For other maternal and infant outcomes, there was little to no difference between groups or the evidence was uncertain. Future research is needed to examine the effects of iron supplementation on other maternal and infant health outcomes, including infant iron status, growth, and development.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:健康焦虑是一种精神障碍,其特征是对健康和身体症状的过度恐惧。怀孕期间的高度焦虑与不良结局有关。这项研究的目的是探讨产前教育对初产妇健康焦虑的影响。
    方法:本研究为准实验研究。122名初产妇在获得参加研究的同意书后,于2019年转诊到综合保健服务Shahrekord(伊朗西南部的一个城市)诊所,随机分为干预组和对照组。干预组参加了8个疗程(1.5小时),每两周一次,从妊娠20到37周。健康焦虑问卷于20日(课程开始前)完成,第28周和第37周两组。怀孕的后果包括体重,阿普加得分,交货类型,分娩时间和首次母乳喂养时间。采用SPSS16版软件进行数据分析。
    结果:发现分娩类型无显著差异,胎龄,高度,体重,头部长度,阿普加得分,住院时间和首次母乳喂养时间。干预组产程活跃期和潜伏期持续时间明显低于对照组,新生儿体重明显高于对照组(P<0.05)。在第37周,疾病关注的分数,干预组的负面结果和总健康焦虑分别减少了3.42、0.93和4.36,对照组增加了2.82、0.03和2.86。
    结论:怀孕教育课程对健康焦虑有积极影响,缩短产程时间,增加新生儿体重。为了改善妊娠结局,应该考虑怀孕期间的教育课程。
    OBJECTIVE: Health anxiety is a mental disorder that characterized by an excessive fear about health and physical symptoms. High anxiety in pregnancy is associated with adverse outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of prenatal education on health anxiety of primigravid women.
    METHODS: The present study was quasi-experimental study. 122 primiparous pregnant women referred to comprehensive health services Shahrekord (A city in the southwest of Iran) clinics in 2019, after receiving consent to participate in the study, randomly divided into two intervention and control groups. The intervention group participated in 8 sessions (1.5-h), once every 2 weeks, from 20 to 37th weeks of gestation. The health anxiety questionnaire was completed on 20th (before the beginning of the courses), 28th and 37th weeks by two groups. Consequences of pregnancy included weight, Apgar score, delivery type, labor time and first breastfeeding time. SPSS version 16 software was used for data analysis.
    RESULTS: No significant difference was found type of delivery, gestational age, height, weight, head length, Apgar score, duration of hospitalization and first breastfeeding time. The duration of the active and latent phase of labor was significantly lower and the weight of newborn was significantly higher in the intervention group than the control group (P < 0.05). At 37th week, the scores of illness concern, negative consequence and total health anxiety in the intervention group decreased by 3.42, 0.93 and 4.36 respectively and in control group increased by 2.82, 0.03 and 2.86.
    CONCLUSIONS: Pregnancy educational courses has positive effects on health anxiety, decrease duration of labor time and increased newborn weight. In order to improve the outcome of pregnancy, educational classes during pregnancy should be considered.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:围产期死亡率是一个全球性的健康问题,尤其是在埃塞俄比亚,围产期死亡率最高。在埃塞俄比亚进行了围产期死亡率的研究,但哪些因素会导致围产期死亡率随时间的变化尚不清楚.
    目的:使用EDHS2005-2016评估埃塞俄比亚围产期死亡率的趋势和多变量分解。
    方法:以社区为基础,采用横断面研究设计.使用EDHS2005-2016年数据,并且已经应用了权重来调整选择概率的差异。使用STATA版本14.1使用基于Logit的多变量分解分析。使用最低的AIC值选择最佳模型,选择的变量在95%CI时p值小于0.05。
    结果:埃塞俄比亚的围产期死亡率趋势从2005年的37/1000婴儿下降到2016年的33/1000婴儿。调查中围产期死亡率下降的约83.3%归因于妇女的禀赋(构成)差异。在禀赋的差异中,ANC访问的组成差异,服用TT疫苗,城市住宅,职业,中等教育,在过去的10年中,接生员显着降低了围产期死亡率。在系数的差异中,熟练的助产士显着降低了围产期死亡率。
    结论:埃塞俄比亚的围产期死亡率随着时间的推移有所下降。像ANC访问这样的变量,服用TT疫苗,城市住宅,职业,中等教育,熟练的接生员降低了围产期死亡率。为了更多地降低围产期死亡率,扩大孕产妇和新生儿保健服务具有关键作用。
    BACKGROUND: Perinatal mortality is a global health problem, especially in Ethiopia, which has the highest perinatal mortality rate. Studies about perinatal mortality were conducted in Ethiopia, but which factors specifically contribute to the change in perinatal mortality across time is unknown.
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the trend and multivariate decomposition of perinatal mortality in Ethiopia using EDHS 2005-2016.
    METHODS: A community-based, cross-sectional study design was used. EDHS 2005-2016 data was used, and weighting has been applied to adjust the difference in the probability of selection. Logit-based multivariate decomposition analysis was used using STATA version 14.1. The best model was selected using the lowest AIC value, and variables were selected with a p-value less than 0.05 at 95% CI.
    RESULTS: The trend of perinatal mortality in Ethiopia decreased from 37 per 1000 births in 2005 to 33 per 1000 births in 2016. About 83.3% of the decrease in perinatal mortality in the survey was attributed to the difference in the endowment (composition) of the women. Among the differences in the endowment, the difference in the composition of ANC visits, taking the TT vaccine, urban residence, occupation, secondary education, and birth attendant significantly decreased perinatal mortality in the last 10 years. Among the differences in coefficients, skilled birth attendants significantly decreased perinatal mortality.
    CONCLUSIONS: The perinatal mortality rate in Ethiopia has declined over time. Variables like ANC visits, taking the TT vaccine, urban residence, occupation, secondary education, and skilled birth attendants reduce perinatal mortality. To reduce perinatal mortality more, scaling up maternal and newborn health services has a critical role.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    先兆子痫和子痫是孕产妇死亡率和发病率的第二主要原因。它还导致高围产期死亡率和发病率。由于子痫先于先兆子痫,并显示疾病的进展,它们具有相同的发病机制和决定因素。这项研究的目的是确定先兆子痫的决定因素,因为它对预防和/或相关后果至关重要。一项无与伦比的病例对照研究于2023年9月1日至30日在HiwotFana综合专业大学医院对2020年6月1日至2023年8月31日分娩的妇女进行。患有先兆子痫的妇女被认为是病例,而那些没有控制的人。使用EPIInfo版本7进行病例对照研究,使用以下假设计算样本量:95%置信区间,80%的功率,病例与对照的比例为1:2,5%无缓解率为305.数据是使用谷歌表格收集的,并使用SPSS26版进行了分析。在多变量逻辑回归中p值<0.05的变量被认为具有统计学意义,他们的关联使用95%置信区间的比值比进行解释.共有300名妇女(100例和200名对照),平均年龄为24.4岁。农村住宅(AOR2.04,95%CI1.10-3.76),年龄小于20岁(AOR3.04,95%CI1.58-5.85),妊娠期高血压疾病的病史(AOR5.52,95%CI1.76-17.33),未发现产前护理(AOR2.38,95%CI1.19-4.75)是先兆子痫的决定因素。我们发现生活在农村地区,以前的先兆子痫病史,没有产前护理,<20岁与子痫前期显著相关。除了以前的先兆子痫,在子痫前期筛查和预防中应注意年轻和农村居民孕妇。
    Pre-eclampsia and eclampsia are the second leading causes of maternal mortality and morbidity. It also results in high perinatal mortality and morbidity. Since eclampsia is preceded by preeclampsia and shows the progression of the disease, they share the same pathogenesis and determining factors. The purpose of this study was to determine determinants of preeclampsia, since it is essential for its prevention and/or its associated consequences. An unmatched case-control study was conducted from September 1-30, 2023 among women who gave birth from June 1, 2020, to August 31, 2023, at Hiwot Fana Comprehensive Specialized University Hospital. Women who had preeclampsia were considered cases, while those without were controls. The sample size was calculated using EPI Info version 7 for a case-control study using the following assumptions: 95% confidence interval, power of 80%, case-to-control ratio of 1:2, and 5% non-response rate were 305. Data was collected using Google Form, and analyzed using SPSS version 26. Variables that had a p-value of < 0.05 on multivariable logistic regression were considered statistically significant, and their association was explained using an odds ratio at a 95% confidence interval. A total of 300 women (100 cases and 200 controls) with a mean age of 24.4 years were included in the study. Rural residence (AOR 2.04, 95% CI 1.10-3.76), age less than 20 years (AOR 3.04, 95% CI 1.58-5.85), history of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (AOR 5.52, 95% CI 1.76-17.33), and no antenatal care (AOR 2.38, 95% CI 1.19-4.75) were found to be the determinants of preeclampsia. We found that living in a rural areas, previous history of preeclampsia, no antenatal care, and < 20 years of age were significantly associated with preeclampsia. In addition to previous preeclampsia, younger and rural resident pregnant women should be given attention in preeclampsia screening and prevention.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:为了比较偏好,摄取,无辅助家庭口服自检(HB-HIVST)与临床快速诊断血液检测(CB-RDT)的辅助因素,用于孕产妇HIV再检测。
    方法:前瞻性队列。
    方法:在2017年11月至2019年6月之间,接受产前护理的HIV阴性怀孕肯尼亚妇女被纳入研究,并选择使用HB-HIVST或CB-RDT进行重新测试。要求妇女在妊娠36周至分娩后1周之间重新测试,如果最后一次HIV检测<24周妊娠或产后6周,如果妊娠≥24周,以及产后14周的自我报告。
    结果:总体而言,994名妇女和33%(n=330)选择了HB-HIVST。选择HB-HIVST是因为它是私有的(n=224,68%),方便(n=211,63%),并提供了重新测试时间的灵活性(n=207,63%),而选择CB-RDT是由于提供者对测试的信任(n=510,77%)和临床试验的便利性(n=423,64%).在905名在随访中报告复检的妇女中,135(15%)使用HB-HIVST。大多数(n=595,94%)选择CB-RDT的人都用这种策略进行了重新测试,与选择HB-HIVST复测的39%(n=120)相比。HB-HIVST再检测在家庭收入较高的妇女和在怀孕期间可能无法进行检测的妇女(产后再检测和妊娠<37周)中更为常见,而在抑郁症妇女中不太常见。大多数女性表示,他们将在将来使用注册时选择的测试进行重新测试(99%[n=133]HB-HIVST;93%[n=715]CB-RDT-RDT)。
    结论:虽然大多数女性更喜欢CB-RDT用于产妇复检,HB-HIVST是可以接受和可行的,可用于扩大艾滋病毒重新检测方案。
    OBJECTIVE: To compare preferences, uptake, and cofactors for unassisted home-based oral self-testing (HB-HIVST) versus clinic-based rapid diagnostic blood tests (CB-RDT) for maternal HIV retesting.
    METHODS: Prospective cohort.
    METHODS: Between November 2017 and June 2019, HIV-negative pregnant Kenyan women receiving antenatal care were enrolled and given a choice to retest with HB-HIVST or CB-RDT. Women were asked to retest between 36 weeks gestation and 1-week post-delivery if the last HIV test was <24 weeks gestation or at 6 weeks postpartum if ≥24 weeks gestation, and self-report on retesting at a 14-week postpartum.
    RESULTS: Overall, 994 women enrolled and 33% (n = 330) selected HB-HIVST. HB-HIVST was selected because it was private (n = 224, 68%), convenient (n = 211, 63%), and offered flexibility in the timing of retesting (n = 207, 63%), whereas CB-RDT was selected due to the trust of providers to administer the test (n = 510, 77%) and convenience of clinic testing (n = 423, 64%). Among 905 women who reported retesting at follow-up, 135 (15%) used HB-HIVST. Most (n = 595, 94%) who selected CB-RDT retested with this strategy, compared to 39% (n = 120) who selected HB-HIVST retesting with HB-HIVST. HB-HIVST retesting was more common among women with higher household income and those who may have been unable to test during pregnancy (both retested postpartum and delivered <37 weeks gestation) and less common among women who were depressed. Most women said they would retest in the future using the test selected at enrollment (99% [n = 133] HB-HIVST; 93% [n = 715] CB-RDT-RDT).
    CONCLUSIONS: While most women preferred CB-RDT for maternal retesting, HB-HIVST was acceptable and feasible and could be used to expand HIV retesting options.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    孕妇及其新生儿的高死亡率是当今非洲最棘手的公共卫生问题之一,埃塞俄比亚是受影响最严重的国家之一。需要采取行为干预措施来提高孕产妇保健服务的利用率,以改善预后。因此,本试验旨在评估经过培训的宗教领袖参与孕产妇健康教育对孕产妇健康服务利用的有效性.
    该研究采用了一项集群随机对照社区试验,包括基线和终线测量。终点数据来自593名孕妇,由干预组和对照组的292名和301名个人组成,分别。在干预组中,训练有素的宗教领袖根据干预方案开展了孕产妇健康行为改变教育。与另一组不同,对照组仅接受定期的孕产妇健康信息,没有接受宗教领袖的额外培训。使用针对基线因素进行调整的二元广义估计方程回归分析来检验干预措施对孕产妇保健服务利用的影响。
    在试验实施之后,干预组最佳产前护理的比例比基线增加了21.4%(50.90vs.72.3,p≤0.001),干预组中机构分娩的比例比基线增加了20%(46.1%vs.66.1%,p≤0.001)。干预组中的怀孕母亲显着显示PNC的比例比基线增加了22.3%(26%vs.48.3%,p≤0.001)。在ANC4中观察到统计学上的显着差异(AOR=2.09,95%CI:1.69,2.57),干预组和对照组的机构分娩(AOR=2.36,95%CI:1.94,2.87)和产后护理服务利用(AOR=2.26,95%CI:1.79,2.85).
    这项研究表明,让接受过孕产妇健康教育培训的宗教领袖参与进来,在提高孕产妇健康服务的利用率方面取得了积极成果。利用这些宗教领袖的影响力地位可能是改善孕产妇保健服务利用率的有效策略。因此,建议通过宗教领袖促进孕产妇健康教育,以提高孕产妇保健服务的利用率。临床试验注册:[https://clinicaltrials.gov/],标识符[NCT05716178]。
    UNASSIGNED: High mortality rates for pregnant women and their new-borns are one of Africa\'s most intractable public health issues today, and Ethiopia is one of the countries most afflicted. Behavioral interventions are needed to increase maternal health service utilizations to improve outcomes. Hence, this trial aimed to evaluate effectiveness of trained religious leaders\' engagement in maternal health education on maternal health service utilization.
    UNASSIGNED: The study employed a cluster-randomized controlled community trial that included baseline and end-line measurements. Data on end points were gathered from 593 pregnant mothers, comprising 292 and 301 individuals in the intervention and control groups, respectively. In the intervention group, the trained religious leaders delivered the behavioral change education on maternal health based on intervention protocol. Unlike the other group, the control group only received regular maternal health information and no additional training from religious leaders. Binary generalized estimating equation regression analysis adjusted for baseline factors were used to test effects of the intervention on maternal health service utilization.
    UNASSIGNED: Following the trial\'s implementation, the proportion of optimal antenatal care in the intervention arm increased by 21.4% from the baseline (50.90 vs. 72.3, p ≤ 0.001) and the proportion of institutional delivery in the intervention group increased by 20% from the baseline (46.1% vs. 66.1%, p ≤ 0.001). Pregnant mothers in the intervention group significantly showed an increase of proportion of PNC by 22.3% from baseline (26% vs. 48.3%, p ≤ 0.001). A statistically significant difference was observed between in ANC4 (AOR = 2.09, 95% CI: 1.69, 2.57), institutional delivery (AOR = 2.36, 95% CI: 1.94, 2.87) and postnatal care service utilization (AOR = 2.26, 95% CI: 1.79, 2.85) between the intervention and control groups.
    UNASSIGNED: This research indicated that involving religious leaders who have received training in maternal health education led to positive outcomes in enhancing the utilization of maternal health services. Leveraging the influential position of these religious leaders could be an effective strategy for improving maternal health service utilization. Consequently, promoting maternal health education through religious leaders is advisable to enhance maternal health service utilization.Clinical trial registration: [https://clinicaltrials.gov/], identifier [NCT05716178].
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究的目的是评估不同临床妊娠条件下孕妇体重增加对学龄前儿童体重的影响。这是一项前瞻性和对照的多队列研究,包括372对母子对,四个不同不良宫内环境的因果组(吸烟,糖尿病,高血压和宫内生长受限的孕妇)和对照组,在这个时期,从2011年到2016年在阿雷格里港(巴西)的三家医院。社会人口统计学,对产前和围产期数据进行分析.妊娠期体重增加(GWG)被归类为“不足”,\'足够\'和\'过多\'。根据GWG和妊娠组,使用广义估计方程(GEE)模型评估从出生到学龄前儿童体重指数的z评分变化。孩子的GWG和体重增加根据产妇年龄和教育程度进行了调整,婚姻状况,家庭收入,怀孕计划,儿童数量,孕前BMI,产前咨询和分娩类型。观察到涉及妊娠组的三重相互作用效应,通过调整后的模型,体重增加和研究时间(p=0.020)。母亲的体重增加超过建议与孩子的z-BMI评分随着时间的推移显着增加有关,孕妇吸烟的孩子除外。糖尿病母亲的孩子,高血压母亲和对照组的体重增加超过了建议在怀孕期间改变了他们的营养状况从富营养化到超重,糖尿病和高血压组变得肥胖,控制超重。监测GWG,特别是在高血压和DM的情况下,应有效预防学龄前儿童超重或肥胖,对未来的健康状况有重要影响。
    The aim of the current study was to assess the influence of maternal weight gain in different clinical gestational conditions on the child\'s weight at pre-school age. This was a longitudinal observational study of a prospective and controlled multiple cohort of 372 mother-child pairs with four causal groups of different adverse intrauterine environments (smoking, diabetic, hypertensive and intrauterine growth-restricted pregnant women) and a control group, in the period of, from 2011 to 2016 in three hospitals in Porto Alegre (Brazil). Sociodemographic, prenatal and perinatal data were analysed. Gestational weight gain (GWG) was categorised as \'insufficient\', \'adequate\' and \'excessive\'. The generalised estimation equations (GEE) model was used to assess changes in the z-score of the child\'s body mass index from birth to pre-school age according to the GWG and gestational group. The child\'s GWG and weight gain were adjusted for maternal age and education, marital status, family income, pregnancy planning, number of children, prepregnancy BMI, prenatal consultations and type of delivery. A triple interaction effect was observed involving the gestational group, weight gain and study time (p = 0.020) through an adjusted model. Maternal weight gain above the recommended is associated with a significant increase in the child\'s z - BMI score over time, except for children from pregnant smokers. Children from diabetic mothers , hypertensive mothers and the control group who had a weight gain above that recommended during pregnancy changed their nutritional status from eutrophic to overweight, becoming obese in the DM and hypertension groups and overweight in control. Monitoring of the GWG, especially in the presence of hypertensive diseases and DM, should be effective to prevent children from developing overweight or obesity in pre-school age with an important impact on health conditions in the future.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号