OBJECTIVE: Physical and cognitive conditions of patients discharged to skilled nursing facilities (SNFs), inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs), and home with home health agencies (HHAs) following total joint arthroplasty (TJA) have not been evaluated. The purpose of this study is to examine the physical and cognitive function trends of Medicare beneficiaries discharged to SNFs, HHAs, and IRFs following TJA from 2013 to 2018.
METHODS: Observational study using Medicare enrollment, claims, and assessment data from 2013-2018.
METHODS: 1,278,939 Medicare beneficiaries discharged to SNFs, HHAs, or IRFs for post-acute care following TJA from 2013 to 2018.
METHODS: Medicare data were used to examine the association between the endpoints of interest [discharge destination (SNF, HHA, or IRF) and the physical (measured using activities of daily living) and cognitive (measured using a range of setting-specific metrics) status of patients in each setting] and the year of TJA (2013-2018) by estimating multivariable models that controlled for patient- and hospital-level covariates.
RESULTS: Multivariable analysis of 1,278,939 TJAs revealed that SNF discharge decreased [44.15% (2013)-21.57% (2018), P < .001], HHA increased (46.72%-72.47%, P < .001), and IRF decreased (9.13%-5.69%, P < .001). For SNF, the mean physical function scores [14.61 (2013)-14.23 (2018), P < .001] and cognitive impairment (13.25%-12.33%, P = .01) decreased, indicating less dependence. Physical function scores (3.09-3.94, P < .001) and cognitive impairment (13.95%-16.52%, P < .001) increased for HHA patients, indicating greater dependence. For IRF, motor functional independence measure decreased (38.81-37.78, P < .001) and cognitive dependence increased (39.08%-46.36%, P < .001), indicating greater dependence.
CONCLUSIONS: From 2013 to 2018, patients were increasingly discharged to HHA. Although SNF patients were less dependent over time, HHA and IRF patients were physically and cognitively more dependent. Each setting is likely to benefit from policy and fiscal supports that help them manage changes in the volume and clinical intensity of patients requiring their services.

OBJECTIVE: To describe characteristics associated with long-term outcomes in severe COVID-19 patients admitted to a post-acute care facility (PACF).
METHODS: Prospective cohort.
METHODS: Consecutive severe COVID-19 admitted to a PACF from April 2020 to August 2021.
METHODS: Patients were followed for 180 days after discharge. Functional outcomes were measured by the modified Barthel index and further stratified into good outcome (for those independent, mildly dependent, or moderately dependent) and into bad outcome (for those severely dependent, completely dependent, or dead). Multivariate binary logistic regression was performed to evaluate between patients\' characteristics and long-term outcomes.
RESULTS: A total of 186 patients admitted from 17 different acute hospitals were included. Median age was 67 years, 88% of patients were previously independent, 95% were admitted to the ICU, and 85% were mechanically ventilated during the acute hospitalization. Median (interquartile range) Barthel indexes at admission, discharge, and 180-day follow-up were 9 (1-23), 81 (45-92), and 100 (98-100) (P < .001), respectively. In addition, 180-day mortality was 17.2%. Baseline functional status, comorbidities, and functional status at admission to the PACF were associated with bad outcome at 180-day follow-up, after multivariate binary logistic regression.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with severe COVID-19 admitted to a PACF had substantial functional improvements at PACF discharge and during 180-day follow-up. These findings may help prognosticate and manage post-acute severe COVID-19 patients.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to describe national trends in hospitalization and post-acute care utilization rates in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) and home health (HH) for both Medicare Advantage (MA) and Traditional Medicare (TM) beneficiaries, reaching up to the COVID-19 pandemic (2015-2019).
METHODS: Retrospective, observational using 100% sample of Medicare Provider Analysis and Review file (MedPAR), the Medicare Beneficiary Summary File, the Minimum Data Set (MDS), and the Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS).
METHODS: Medicare beneficiaries aged 66 and older enrolled in MA or TM who were hospitalized and discharged alive.
METHODS: We first calculated the proportions of MA and TM beneficiaries who were hospitalized and who used any post-acute care, as well as the total number of days of post-acute care used. We also calculated the size of the post-acute care network used by TM and MA beneficiaries within each hospital in our sample and the measured quality (star ratings) of the post-acute care providers used.
RESULTS: We found hospitalizations, SNF stays, and HH stays were all decreasing over time in both populations. Although similar proportions of MA and TM beneficiaries received SNF or HH care, MA beneficiaries received fewer days. The largest difference we found was in the number of post-acute care providers used in TM and MA, with MA using far fewer; however, quality ratings were similar among post-acute care providers used in each program.
CONCLUSIONS: Together, these results suggest MA beneficiaries have fewer days in post-acute care, receive care from fewer providers of similar measured quality to TM, but have a similar number of days outside the hospital or SNF in the first 100 days after hospital discharge.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the results of post-acute care (PAC) rehabilitation for persons living with dementia (PLWD).
METHODS: Systematic review of published literature without date restrictions through April 2023.
METHODS: PLWD undergoing rehabilitation in PAC facilities after an acute care hospitalization.
METHODS: A systematic search was carried out in PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Included studies were peer-reviewed, available in English, and focused on PLWD admitted to rehabilitation facilities following hospitalization in the US and international settings. Studies on long-term care and acute inpatient rehabilitation units were excluded. Two reviewers independently screened articles and conducted a quality appraisal of selected studies. A narrative synthesis approach was used for analysis of results with rehabilitation themes encompassing \"outcomes\" and \"experiences.\"
RESULTS: Forty-one articles met inclusion criteria, with a heterogeneity of study designs including observational (n = 33), randomized clinical trials (n = 3), and qualitative studies (n = 5). Narrative synthesis demonstrated that PAC rehabilitation for PLWD contained themes of \"outcomes,\" including health service utilization and physical and cognitive function, providing evidence for a lower likelihood to return home and achieving less functional improvement compared to individuals without cognitive impairment. The second theme, \"experiences,\" included health care transitions, knowledge and education, goal alignment, and care models. Findings detailed poor communication around care transitions, lack of dementia knowledge among health care workers, goal alignment strategies, and innovative rehabilitation models specific for PLWD.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this systematic review covers a breadth of literature across time and international settings on PAC rehabilitation for PLWD. The findings highlight the importance of rehabilitation models specific for dementia care, with a need for personalized approaches around care transitions, goal setting, and increased dementia education. Addressing these aspects of rehabilitative care for PLWD may enhance the delivery of PAC and improve health care outcomes and experiences.

暂无摘要。

OBJECTIVE: To investigate disparities in admissions to highly rated skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) between Medicare beneficiaries with and without opioid use disorder (OUD).
METHODS: Nationwide, retrospective observational cohort.
METHODS: Medicare Fee-for-Service beneficiaries aged ≥18 years admitted to SNFs following hospitalization during 2016-2020 (n = 30,922 with OUD and n = 137,454 without OUD).
METHODS: Data used were 100% Medicare inpatient claims, nursing home administrative databases, and Nursing Home Compare. We identified hospitalized patients with and without OUD and matched them on age, sex, Part D low-income subsidy (LIS), and residential county. We compared the overall and component (quality, staffing, and health inspections) star ratings of SNFs that beneficiaries entered. Beneficiary-level regression models were conducted adjusting for race and ethnicity, Medicare-Medicaid dual status, comorbidity score, hospital length of stay, and state and year fixed effects.
RESULTS: The overall study sample had a mean (SD) age of 71.4 (11.4) years, 63.9% were female, and 57.4% had LIS. Among beneficiaries with OUD, 50.3% entered SNFs with above-average (4 or 5) overall rating compared with 51.3% among those without OUD. Distributions of above-average ratings among beneficiaries with and without OUD were as follows: 63.9% vs 62.2% for quality, 32.8% vs 34.9% for health inspections, and 46.2% vs 45.0% for staffing, respectively. Adjusted regression models indicated that beneficiaries with OUD were less likely to be admitted to facilities with above-average overall (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.87-0.92), health inspection (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.88-0.93), and staffing (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.89-0.94) ratings compared with beneficiaries without OUD, whereas quality (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.95-1.01) ratings did not differ.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite mixed results on component ratings, our findings suggest a concerning disparity in the overall quality of SNFs admitting Medicare beneficiaries with OUD. Enhancing equitable access to high-quality SNF care for individuals with OUD is imperative amid rising demand and legal protections under the American Disabilities Act.

OBJECTIVE: Early rehospitalization of frail older adults after hospital discharge is harmful to patients and challenging to hospitals. Mobile integrated health (MIH) programs may be an effective solution for delivering community-based transitional care. The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility and implementation of an MIH transitional care program.
METHODS: Pilot clinical trial of a transitional home visit conducted by MIH paramedics within 72 hours of hospital discharge.
METHODS: Patients aged ≥65 years discharged from an urban hospital with a system-adapted eFrailty index ≥0.24 were eligible to participate.
METHODS: Participants were enrolled after hospital discharge. Demographic and clinical information were recorded at enrollment and 30 days after discharge from the electronic health record. Data from a comparison group of patients excluded from enrollment due to geographical location was also abstracted. Primary outcomes were intervention feasibility and implementation, which were reported descriptively. Exploratory clinical outcomes included emergency department (ED) visits and rehospitalization within 30 days. Categorical and continuous group comparisons were conducted using χ2 tests and Kruskal-Wallis testing. Binomial regression was used for comparative outcomes.
RESULTS: One hundred of 134 eligible individuals (74.6%) were enrolled (median age 81, 64% female). Forty-seven participants were included in the control group (median age 80, 55.2% female). The complete protocol was performed in 92 (92.0%) visits. Paramedics identified acute clinical problems in 23 (23.0%) visits, requested additional services for participants during 34 (34.0%) encounters, and detected medication errors during 34 (34.0%). The risk of 30-day rehospitalization was lower in the Paramedic-Assisted Community Evaluation after Discharge (PACED) group compared with the control (RR, 0.40; CI, 0.19-0.84; P = .03); there was a trend toward decreased risk of 30-day ED visits (RR, 0.61; CI, 0.37-1.37; P = .23).
CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study of an MIH transition care program was feasible with high protocol fidelity. It yields preliminary evidence demonstrating a decreased risk of rehospitalization in frail older adults.

OBJECTIVE: To review evidence on post-acute care (PAC) use and disparities related to race and ethnicity and rurality in the United States over the past 2 decades among individuals who underwent major joint replacement (MJR).
METHODS: Systematic review.
METHODS: We included studies that examined US PAC trends and racial and ethnic and/or urban vs rural differences among individuals who are aged ≥18 years with hospitalization after MJR.
METHODS: We searched large academic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus) for peer-reviewed, English language articles from January 1, 2000, and January 26, 2022.
RESULTS: Seventeen studies were reviewed. Studies (n = 16) consistently demonstrated that discharges post-MJR to skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) or nursing homes (NHs) decreased over time, whereas evidence on discharges to inpatient rehab facilities (IRFs), home health care (HHC), and home without HHC services were mixed. Most studies (n = 12) found that racial and ethnic minority individuals, especially Black individuals, were more frequently discharged to PAC institutions than white individuals. Demographic factors (ie, age, sex, comorbidities) and marital status were not only independently associated with discharges to institutional PAC, but also among racial and ethnic minority individuals. Only one study found urban-rural differences in PAC use, indicating that urban-dwelling individuals were more often discharged to both SNF/NH and HHC than their rural counterparts.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite declines in institutional PAC use post-MJR over time, racial and minority individuals continue to experience higher rates of institutional PAC discharges compared with white individuals. To address these disparities, policymakers should consider measures that target multimorbidity and the lack of social and structural support among socially vulnerable individuals. Policymakers should also consider initiatives that address the economic and structural barriers experienced in rural areas by expanding access to telehealth and through improved care coordination.

Challenges to recruitment of family caregivers exist and are amplified when consent must occur in the context of chaotic healthcare circumstances, such as the transition from hospital to home. The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic during our randomized controlled trial provided an opportunity for a natural experiment exploring and examining different consent processes for caregiver recruitment. The purpose of this publication is to describe different recruitment processes (in-person versus virtual) and compare diversity in recruitment rates in the context of a care recipient\'s hospitalization. We found rates of family caregiver recruitment for in-person versus virtual were 28% and 23%, respectively (p = 0.01). Differences existed across groups with family caregivers recruited virtually being more likely to be younger, white, have greater than high school education, and not be a spouse or significant other to the care recipient, such as a child. Future work is still needed to identify the modality and timing of family caregiver recruitment to maximize rates and enhance the representativeness of the population for equitable impact.

Enrollment in Medicare Advantage (MA) has been rapidly growing. We examined whether MA enrollment affects the outcomes of post-acute nursing home care among patients with Alzheimer\'s disease and related dementias (ADRD). We exploited year-to-year changes in MA penetration rates within counties from 2012 through 2019. After adjusting for patient-level characteristics and county fixed effects, we found that MA enrollment was not associated with days spent at home, nursing home days, likelihood of becoming a long-stay resident, hospital days, hospital readmission, or 1-year mortality. There was a modest increase in successful discharge to the community by 0.73 percentage points (relative increase of 2.4%) associated with a 10-percentage-point increase in MA enrollment. The results are consistent among racial/ethnic subgroups and dual-eligible patients. These findings suggest an imperative need to monitor and improve quality of managed care among enrollees with ADRD.