liver resection

肝切除术
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:评估患者年龄对肝细胞癌(HCC)肝切除术(LR)结果的影响。
    方法:分析2010年至2020年间接受LR的HCC患者。根据患者的年龄将其分为3组。I组(60岁以下患者),II组(60至69岁的患者),和第三组(患者等于或超过70岁)。
    结果:364例患者被纳入。在I组中观察到明显较高的血清胆红素和α-feto蛋白,在III组中观察到血清肌酐。研究组没有显示任何关于HCC部位的显著差异。number,大血管浸润,LR的范围,普林格尔机动,围手术期输血。二组及三组手术时间较长,而在组(I)中发现更多的失血患者有更长的住院时间。I组和(II)组的术后发病率均较高。I组肝切除术后肝功能障碍的发生率较高。与肝功能衰竭有关.我们在组(III)中没有出现早期死亡,117例患者发生了晚期死亡(32.1%)。肝癌复发165例(45.3%)。关于整体和无瘤生存率,我们在3组之间没有任何显著差异(LogRank:分别为p=0.371和0.464).
    结论:治疗性LR可以安全地在选定的老年HCC患者中进行。高龄患者不应视为治愈性LR的禁忌症。
    BACKGROUND: Evaluation of the influence of the age of the patients upon the outcomes of liver resection (LR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
    METHODS: HCC patients who underwent LR between 2010 and 2020 were analyzed. They were divided into 3 groups depending on the patient\'s age. Group I (patients less than 60 years), Group II (patients between 60 and 69 years), and Group III (patients equal to or more than 70 years).
    RESULTS: 364 patients were included. A significantly higher serum bilirubin and alpha feto-protein were noted in Group I and serum creatinine was noted in Group III. The study groups did not show any significant differences regarding HCC site, number, macrovascular invasion, the extent of LR, Pringle maneuver, and perioperative blood transfusions. Longer operation time was found in Groups II and III, while more blood loss was noted in Group (I) Group I patients had longer hospital stays. Higher postoperative morbidities were noted in both Group I and Group (II) Higher incidence of post-hepatectomy liver dysfunction was noted in Group I. More early mortalities were found in Group I, related to liver failure. We did not experience early mortality in Group (III) Late Mortalities occurred in 117 patients (32.1%). HCC recurrence occurred in 165 patients (45.3%). Regarding the overall- and tumor-free survival, we did not experience any significant differences among the 3 groups (Log Rank: p = 0.371 and 0.464 respectively).
    CONCLUSIONS: Curative LR can be safely performed in selected elderly patients with HCC. An advanced patient\'s age should not be considered as a contraindication for curative LR.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究旨在探讨肝内胆管癌(ICC)患者的术前预后因素,并提出一种新的结合CA19-9和中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值(NLR)的ICC术前预后评分系统。
    方法:在本回顾性分析中,研究了1728例诊断为ICC并接受根治性肝切除术的患者。这项研究采用单变量和多变量Cox回归来寻找影响复发和总生存期(OS)的因素。并进一步评估术前模型如何影响肿瘤特征和术后复发。
    结果:多变量Cox回归分析结果表明,两个术前变量,NLR和Ca19-9是影响ICC患者术后复发和OS的独立危险因素。根据这些数据,将这两个因素分为0(NLR≤2.4和Ca19-9≤37U/ml)或1(NLR>2.4和Ca19-9>37U/ml),得出术前预后评分.根据评分模型,患者分为三组:0分(低风险组),1分(中等风险组),2分(高危人群)。三组的5年复发率和OS率为56.6%,68.2%,77.8%,和56.8%,40.6%,27.6%,分别,所有P值<0.001。此外,高危人群患者更容易出现早期复发(早期复发率高,中介-,低危人群占56.8%,51.5%,和37.1%,分别,P<0.001)和肝外转移(肝外转移率高,中介-,低风险人群为31.7%,26.4%,和15.4%,分别,P<0.001)。就肿瘤特征而言,高风险组患者肿瘤直径较大,更有可能出现微血管侵犯,淋巴结转移,和神经周侵犯。
    结论:合并NLR和CA19-9水平的术前评分系统有效地捕获了ICC患者术后复发率和OS率的预测能力。
    BACKGROUND: This study aims to investigate preoperative prognostic factors available for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) patients and propose a new preoperative prognostic scoring system for ICC that combines CA19-9 and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR).
    METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, 1728 patients diagnosed with ICC and undergoing curative liver resections were studied. This study employed univariate and multivariate Cox regression to find factors affecting recurrence and overall survival (OS), and furthermore assessed how preoperative models influenced tumor traits and postoperative recurrence.
    RESULTS: The results of the multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that two preoperative variables, NLR and Ca19-9, were independent risk factors affecting postoperative recurrence and OS in ICC patients. Based on this data, assigning a score of 0 (NLR ≤ 2.4 and Ca19-9 ≤ 37U/ml) or 1 (NLR > 2.4 and Ca19-9 > 37U/ml) to these two factors, a preoperative prognostic score was derived. According to the scoring model, patients were divided into three groups: 0 points (low-risk group), 1 point (intermediate-risk group), and 2 points (high-risk group). The 5-year recurrence and OS rates for the three groups were 56.6%, 68.2%, 77.8%, and 56.8%, 40.6%, 27.6%, respectively, with all P values < 0.001. Furthermore, high-risk group patients were more prone to early recurrence (early recurrence rates for high-, intermediate-, and low-risk groups were 56.8%, 51.5%, and 37.1%, respectively, P < 0.001) and extrahepatic metastasis (extrahepatic metastasis rates for high-, intermediate-, and low-risk groups were 31.7%, 26.4%, and 15.4%, respectively, P < 0.001). In terms of tumor characteristics, high-risk group patients had larger tumor diameters and were more likely to experience microvascular invasion, lymph node metastasis, and perineural invasion.
    CONCLUSIONS: The predictive capacity of postoperative recurrence and OS rates in ICC patients is effectively captured by the preoperative scoring system incorporating NLR and CA19-9 levels.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们评估了日本与肝脏手术相关的发病率和死亡率,并使用国家数据库中的信息开发了肝脏切除术的风险模型。
    我们使用来自国家临床数据库(NCD)注册的信息,回顾性审查了2014年至2019年期间接受肝切除术的73861名日本患者。主要终点是30天和住院死亡率,次要终点是术后并发症。根据术前临床参数和肝切除术类型,构建肝切除术后发病率和死亡率的Logistic回归风险模型,并使用引导方法进行验证。
    30天和住院死亡率分别为0.9%和1.7%,分别。三段切除术,胆囊癌的肝切除术,肝门部胆管癌的肝切除术,不良的日常生活活动是术后发病率和死亡率的统计学显著危险因素,比值比较高.内部验证表明,30天死亡率和住院死亡率的c指数分别为0.824和0.839。
    我们通过使用国家外科数据库开发了肝切除术的风险模型,该数据库可根据术前因素预测发病率和死亡率。
    UNASSIGNED: We evaluated the morbidity and mortality associated with liver surgery in Japan and developed a risk model for liver resection using information from a national database.
    UNASSIGNED: We retrospectively reviewed 73 861 Japanese patients who underwent hepatectomy between 2014 and 2019, using information from the National Clinical Database (NCD) registrations. The primary endpoints were 30 days and in-hospital mortality, and the secondary endpoints were postoperative complications. Logistic regression risk models for postoperative morbidity and mortality after hepatectomy were constructed based on preoperative clinical parameters and types of liver resection, and validated using a bootstrapping method.
    UNASSIGNED: The 30-day and in-hospital mortality rates were 0.9% and 1.7%, respectively. Trisectionectomy, hepatectomy for gallbladder cancer, hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, and poor activities of daily living were statistically significant risk factors with high odds ratios for both postoperative morbidity and mortality. Internal validations indicated that the c-indices for 30-day and in-hospital mortality were 0.824 and 0.839, respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: We developed a risk model for liver resection by using a national surgical database that can predict morbidity and mortality based on preoperative factors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    胆囊癌(GBC)是一种预后不良的罕见疾病。简单的胆囊切除术可能是仅适用于早期疾病的适当治疗方法(Tis,T1a),而对于更晚期的疾病(T1b和T2),建议再次手术。根治性胆囊切除术应该有两个基本目标:彻底切除肝实质并达到足够的淋巴结清除。然而,最近的研究表明,与单纯的淋巴结清扫相比,肝切除术不能改善生存结果.淋巴结清扫术和肝切除术的肿瘤学作用是不同的。因此,对于无肝侵犯的附带GBC患者,肝切除并不总是强制性的。
    Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is a rare disease with a poor prognosis. Simple cholecystectomy may be an adequate treatment only for very early disease (Tis, T1a), whereas reoperation is recommended for more advanced disease (T1b and T2). Radical cholecystectomy should have two fundamental objectives: To radically resect the liver parenchyma and to achieve adequate clearance of the lymph nodes. However, recent studies have shown that compared with lymph node dissection alone, liver resection does not improve survival outcomes. The oncological roles of lymphadenectomy and liver resection is distinct. Therefore, for patients with incidental GBC without liver invasion, hepatic resection is not always mandatory.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管缺乏随机试验的证据,机器人肝切除术(RH)已越来越多地用于治疗肝脏恶性肿瘤。我们旨在确定RH与腹腔镜肝切除术(LH)对接受微创肝切除术治疗肝脏恶性肿瘤的患者生活质量的影响。
    这种单盲,随机试验在三级医疗学术中心(DRKS00027531)进行.对可切除的肝脏恶性肿瘤患者进行了资格评估,并随机分配给RH或LH,并按恶性肿瘤类型和切除难度进行分层。患者不知道治疗分配。主要结果是手术后90天内的平均生活质量,用欧洲癌症研究和治疗组织QLQ-C30问卷的作用功能量表进行测量。次要结果包括手术时间,发病率,失血,转化率,术后恢复,和切除边缘状态。
    在2022年2月21日至2023年9月18日之间,纳入了80例患者(RH:n=41,LH:n=39),并在意向治疗的基础上进行了分析。RH和LH之间的角色功能评分没有差异(平均值[SD],74.3[23.3]对79.6[22.3];平均差-5.3,95%CI-15.6至5.1,p=0.547)。综合并发症指数在研究组之间没有显著差异(8.9[23.1]和15.5[23.9],p=0.137)。其他围手术期结局无差异。
    RH在生活质量方面产生了相似的结果,可以被认为是LH的安全替代品。
    无。
    UNASSIGNED: Robotic hepatectomy (RH) has been increasingly adopted for the treatment of liver malignancies despite lacking evidence from randomised trials. We aimed to determine the effect of RH compared to laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) on quality of life in patients undergoing minimally invasive hepatectomy for liver malignancies.
    UNASSIGNED: This single-blinded, randomised trial was conducted at a tertiary care academic centre (DRKS00027531). Patients with resectable liver malignancies were assessed for eligibility and randomly assigned to either RH or LH with stratification by type of malignancy and difficulty of resection. Patients were blinded to the treatment allocation. The primary outcome was the mean quality of life within 90 days after surgery, measured with the role functioning scale of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Secondary outcomes included operating time, morbidity, blood loss, conversion rate, postoperative recovery, and resection margin status.
    UNASSIGNED: Between February 21, 2022, and Sep 18, 2023, 80 patients (RH: n = 41, LH: n = 39) were included and analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. Role functioning scores did not differ between RH and LH (mean [SD], 74.3 [23.3] versus 79.6 [22.3]; mean difference -5.3, 95% CI -15.6 to 5.1, p = 0.547). The comprehensive complication index was not significantly different between the study groups (8.9 [23.1] versus 15.5 [23.9], p = 0.137). There were no differences in other perioperative outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: RH yielded similar outcomes in quality of life and can be considered a safe alternative to LH.
    UNASSIGNED: None.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:我们试图开发一种基于人工智能(AI)的模型来预测神经内分泌肝转移(NELM)根治性切除术后的早期复发(ER)。
    方法:NELM患者,从多机构数据库中确定接受切除的患者.ER定义为手术后12个月内复发。使用10种临床病理因素开发了基于不同AI的模型来预测ER。
    结果:总体而言,包括473名NELM患者。在284例(60.0%)复发患者中,118例(41.5%)患者出现ER。集成AI模型显示了训练和测试队列中ROC曲线下的最高面积(AUC)为0.763和0.716,分别。原发性神经内分泌肿瘤的最大直径,NELM放射学肿瘤负荷评分(TBS),和双侧肝脏受累是与NELMER风险最相关的因素。预测发生ER的患者5年无复发生存率和总生存率较差(21.4%vs.37.1%;p=0.002和61.6%与90.3%;p=0.03,分别)与未预测复发的患者。在线提供了一个易于使用的工具:(https://altaf-pawlik-nelm-earlyrecovery-calculator。流光。app/)。
    结论:基于AI的模型在预测NELM切除后的ER方面表现出极好的区分度。该模型可能有助于识别可能从治愈性切除中受益最大的患者,根据预后对患者进行风险分层,并指导量身定制的监测和治疗决策,包括考虑非手术治疗方案。
    OBJECTIVE: We sought to develop an artificial intelligence (AI)-based model to predict early recurrence (ER) after curative-intent resection of neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELMs).
    METHODS: Patients with NELM who underwent resection were identified from a multi-institutional database. ER was defined as recurrence within 12 months of surgery. Different AI-based models were developed to predict ER using 10 clinicopathologic factors.
    RESULTS: Overall, 473 patients with NELM were included. Among 284 patients with recurrence (60.0%), 118 patients (41.5%) developed an ER. An ensemble AI model demonstrated the highest area under receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.763 and 0.716 in the training and testing cohorts, respectively. Maximum diameter of the primary neuroendocrine tumor, NELM radiologic tumor burden score, and bilateral liver involvement were the factors most strongly associated with risk of NELM ER. Patients predicted to develop ER had worse 5-year recurrence-free survival and overall survival (21.4% vs 37.1% [P = .002] and 61.6% vs 90.3% [P = .03], respectively) than patients not predicted to recur. An easy-to-use tool was made available online: (https://altaf-pawlik-nelm-earlyrecurrence-calculator.streamlit.app/).
    CONCLUSIONS: An AI-based model demonstrated excellent discrimination to predict ER of NELM after resection. The model may help identify patients who can benefit the most from curative-intent resection, risk stratify patients according to prognosis, as well as guide tailored surveillance and treatment decisions including consideration of nonsurgical treatment options.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:多项研究报道了预测肝切除术(LR)后肝细胞癌(HCC)早期复发的模型。然而,这些模型太复杂,无法在日常实践中使用。我们的目标是开发一个简单的模型。
    方法:我们招募了1133例接受LR治疗的新诊断HCC患者。使用Kaplan-Meier方法和log-rank检验进行生存分析和Cox比例风险分析,以确定与早期复发相关的预后因素(即,LR后两年内复发)。
    结果:在403例(35.1%)患者中发现早期复发。在多变量分析中,甲胎蛋白(AFP)20-399vs.<20ng/ml(HR=1.282[95%置信区间=1.002-1.639];p=0.048);AFP≥400vs.<20ng/ml(HR=1.755[1.382-2.229];p<0.001);第7版美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)第2阶段与1(HR=1.958[1.505-2.547];p<0.001);AJCC阶段3vs.1(HR=4.099[3.043-5.520];p<0.001);和病理定义的肝硬化(HR=1.46[1.200-1.775];p<0.001)与早期复发有关。我们用这些变量构建了一个预测模型,这为无复发生存(RFS)提供了三个风险层次:低风险,中间风险,高风险,两年RFS为79%,57%,35%,分别(p<0.001)。
    结论:我们开发了一个简单的模型来预测接受LR治疗的HCC患者的早期复发风险。
    OBJECTIVE: Multiple studies have reported models for predicting early recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after liver resection (LR). However, these models are too complex to use in daily practice. We aimed to develop a simple model.
    METHODS: We enrolled 1133 patients with newly diagnosed HCC undergoing LR. The Kaplan - Meier method and log-rank test were used for survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards analysis to identify prognostic factors associated with early recurrence (i.e., recurrence within two years after LR).
    RESULTS: Early recurrence was identified in 403 (35.1%) patients. In multivariate analysis, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) 20-399 vs. < 20 ng/ml (HR = 1.282 [95% confidence interval = 1.002-1.639]; p = 0.048); AFP ≥ 400 vs. < 20 ng/ml (HR = 1.755 [1.382-2.229]; p < 0.001); 7th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage 2 vs. 1 (HR = 1.958 [1.505-2.547]; p < 0.001); AJCC stage 3 vs. 1 (HR = 4.099 [3.043-5.520]; p < 0.001); and pathology-defined cirrhosis (HR = 1.46 [1.200-1.775]; p < 0.001) were associated with early recurrence. We constructed a predictive model with these variables, which provided three risk strata for recurrence-free survival (RFS): low risk, intermediate risk, and high risk, with two-year RFS of 79%, 57%, and 35%, respectively (p < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: We developed a simple model to predict early recurrence risk for patients undergoing LR for HCC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:孤立的胆漏是一种相对罕见的术后胆漏。大多数孤立的胆漏需要侵入性程序,例如手术方法。
    方法:右前段切除术中右肝导管在术中损伤。损伤胆管术后发生胆漏,尽管在肝切除术中通过缝合修复了受伤的胆管,并进行了C管引流以减压胆管。不幸的是,非手术治疗是不可能的.因此,由于残肝体积小,肝功能差,最终在右肝管和空肠之间进行了胆肠吻合。
    结论:胆肠吻合术可以避免丧失功能性肝实质,但是在肝细胞癌复发的情况下,经肝动脉化疗栓塞术在接受肠管翻修术的患者中,由于胆管炎而导致肝脓肿的风险很高。应根据临床资料仔细选择肝切除或胆肠吻合术,比如剩余的肝脏体积,肝功能,和原发性肝病。
    结论:我们报告了一例肝细胞癌前路切除术后孤立性胆漏的病例,在受损的右肝管进行了Roux-en-Y肝空肠吻合术。
    BACKGROUND: An isolated bile leakage is a relatively rare type of postoperative bile leakage. Most isolated bile leakages require invasive procedures such as surgical approaches.
    METHODS: The right hepatic duct was intraoperatively injured during right anterior sectionectomy. Bile leakage occurred postoperatively in the injured bile duct, although the injured bile duct was repaired with suturing and C-tube drainage was performed to decompress the bile duct during hepatectomy. Unfortunately, nonsurgical treatment was not possible. Therefore, bilio-enteric anastomosis between the right hepatic duct and jejunum was ultimately performed because of the small remnant liver volume and poor liver function.
    CONCLUSIONS: Bilio-enteric anastomosis can avoid sacrificing functioning liver parenchyma, but in cases of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence, transarterial chemoembolization carries a high risk of liver abscess due to cholangitis in patients undergoing enteric revision. Liver resection or bilio-enteric anastomosis should be carefully selected based on clinical data, such as remnant liver volume, liver function, and primary liver disease.
    CONCLUSIONS: We report a case of isolated bile leakage after anterior sectionectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma that was managed with Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy at the injured right hepatic duct.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:我们的研究旨在确定根治性结直肠肝转移(CRLM)切除术后复发的预测因素和模式。
    方法:单中心,我们对2010~2022年接受手术的CRLM患者进行了回顾性研究.首次复发部位为肝脏(边缘(≤1cm)或边缘外),肝外,或者两者兼而有之。预测复发模式和总生存期的因素通过多变量Cox回归分析和反向消除变量来确定。
    结果:该研究包括258名患者,同步(144;56%)和异时(114;43%)转移的比例相似。在43个月的中位随访中,156例患者(60.4%)出现复发,其中33例(21.1%)出现在肝脏,62(24.03%)肝外复发,58(22.48%)两者兼有。在7例(9.89%)肝复发患者中发现了孤立的边缘肝复发。中位总生存期和无复发生存期分别为38个月(30-54)和13个月(11-16)。分别。3年无肝脏复发生存率为54.4%(44.9-60.6)。肝转移瘤的大小>5cm(HR2.06(1.34-3.17),涉及手术切缘(HR2.16(1.27-3.68)),和辅助化疗(HR1.89(1.07-3.35))是肝复发的预测因子。主要节点阳性(HR1.61(1.02-2.56)),基线肝外转移的存在(HR0.30(0.18-0.51)),肝转移瘤的大小>5cm(HR2.02(1.37-2.99)),低分化组织学(HR2.25(1.28-3.49)),存在LVI(HR2.25(1.28-3.94)),和辅助化疗(HR2.15(1.28-3.61))是肝外复发的预测因子。
    结论:研究发现大多数复发发生在肝外部位,而孤立的边缘复发很少。复发的一致预测因素是大小和无法提供辅助治疗。量身定制的辅助治疗可能会改善结直肠癌肝转移切除术后的预后。
    BACKGROUND: Our study aims to determine the predictors and patterns of relapses after curative colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) resection.
    METHODS: A single-centre, retrospective study of CRLM patients operated between 2010 and 2022 was performed. The site of first recurrence was either hepatic (marginal (≤ 1 cm) or extramarginal), extrahepatic, or both. Factors that predicted relapse patterns and overall survival were determined by multivariable Cox regression analysis with backward elimination of variables.
    RESULTS: The study consisted of 258 patients, with a similar proportion of synchronous (144; 56%) and metachronous(114; 43%) metastasis. At a 43-month median follow-up, 156 patients (60.4%) developed recurrences with 33 (21.1%) in the liver, 62(24.03%) extra-hepatic recurrences, and 58 (22.48%) having both. Isolated marginal liver relapses were seen in seven (9.89%) liver recurrence patients. The median overall and relapse-free survivals were 38 months (30-54) and 13 months (11-16), respectively. The 3-year liver-relapse-free survival was 54.4% (44.9-60.6). Size of liver metastases > 5 cm (HR 2.06 (1.34-3.17), involved surgical margins (HR 2.16 (1.27-3.68)), and adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 1.89 (1.07-3.35)) were predictors of hepatic recurrences. Node positivity of primary (HR 1.61 (1.02-2.56)), presence of baseline extra-hepatic metastases (HR 0.30 (0.18-0.51)), size of liver metastases > 5 cm (HR 2.02 (1.37-2.99)), poorly differentiated histology (HR 2.25 (1.28-3.49)), presence of LVI (HR 2.25 (1.28-3.94)), and adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 2.15 (1.28-3.61)) were predictors of extra-hepatic recurrences.
    CONCLUSIONS: The study found majority relapses occurred at extrahepatic sites whilst isolated marginal recurrences were few. The consistent predictors of recurrence were size and inability to deliver adjuvant therapy. A tailored adjuvant therapy might improve outcomes after liver metastasectomy in colorectal cancers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    手术过程中无法控制的出血与高死亡率和住院时间有关。需要使用止血剂。纤维蛋白密封胶贴剂提供了一种有效的解决方案,以实现止血和改善肝切除手术患者的预后。我们先前已经证明了纳米结构的纤维蛋白-琼脂糖水凝胶(NFAH)的功效。然而,为了产品的广泛分销和商业化,有必要开发一种最佳的保存方法,以延长稳定性并促进储存和分配。我们研究了冷冻保存作为使用海藻糖保存NFAH的潜在方法。研究了冷冻保存的NFAH(Cryo-NFAH)的结构变化,并对新鲜制备的NFAH进行了体外和体内疗效比较和安全性研究。我们还检查了大鼠部分肝切除术模型中Cryo-NFAH与TachoSil的长期安全性,包括止血时间,腹腔粘连,肝血肿,炎症因子,组织病理学变量,温度和体重,血液相容性和细胞毒性。结构分析表明,低温保存后,Cryo-NFAH保留了其大部分宏观和微观特性。同样,止血功效测定显示与新鲜NFAH没有显着差异。安全性评价表明,Cryo-NFAH在大鼠手术后长达40天具有与TachoSil相似的总体特征。此外,与TachoSil相比,Cryo-NFAH表现出优异的止血功效,同时与TachoSil和其他市售止血剂相比,还表现出更低水平的红细胞溶解和细胞毒性。这些结果表明,Cryo-NFAH是具有良好安全性和耐受性的高效止血贴片,支持其临床应用的潜力。
    Uncontrolled bleeding during surgery is associated with high mortality and prolonged hospital stay, necessitating the use of hemostatic agents. Fibrin sealant patches offer an efficient solution to achieve hemostasis and improve patient outcomes in liver resection surgery. We have previously demonstrated the efficacy of a nanostructured fibrin-agarose hydrogel (NFAH). However, for the widespread distribution and commercialization of the product, it is necessary to develop an optimal preservation method that allows for prolonged stability and facilitates storage and distribution. We investigated cryopreservation as a potential method for preserving NFAH using trehalose. Structural changes in cryopreserved NFAH (Cryo-NFAH) were investigated and comparative in vitro and in vivo efficacy and safety studies were performed with freshly prepared NFAH. We also examined the long-term safety of Cryo-NFAH versus TachoSil in a rat partial hepatectomy model, including time to hemostasis, intra-abdominal adhesion, hepatic hematoma, inflammatory factors, histopathological variables, temperature and body weight, hemocompatibility and cytotoxicity. Structural analyses demonstrated that Cryo-NFAH retained most of its macro- and microscopic properties after cryopreservation. Likewise, hemostatic efficacy assays showed no significant differences with fresh NFAH. Safety evaluations indicated that Cryo-NFAH had a similar overall profile to TachoSil up to 40 days post-surgery in rats. In addition, Cryo-NFAH demonstrated superior hemostatic efficacy compared with TachoSil while also demonstrating lower levels of erythrolysis and cytotoxicity than both TachoSil and other commercially available hemostatic agents. These results indicate that Cryo-NFAH is highly effective hemostatic patch with a favorable safety and tolerability profile, supporting its potential for clinical use.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号