hospital discharge

医院出院
  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在医疗建议下出院的患者占住院人数的1%-2%。违反医疗建议(DAMA)的定义是住院患者在治疗医疗团队建议出院之前选择离开医院。DAMA的行为对两个病人都有影响,工作人员和他们的持续照顾。具体来说,这意味着患者的医疗问题可能没有得到充分的评估或治疗。决定参加DAMA的患者往往是年轻男性,来自较低的社会经济背景,并有精神健康或物质滥用障碍的历史。DAMA具有相关的发病率和死亡率增加的风险。在这篇关于西方医疗机构研究的综述中,特别是成人内科住院患者,我们将审查证据并寻求解决原因,在这种常见情况下的后果和可能的纠正措施。
    Patients who discharge themselves against medical advice comprise 1%-2% of hospital admissions. Discharge against medical advice (DAMA) is defined as when a hospitalised patient chooses to leave the hospital before the treating medical team recommends discharge. The act of DAMA impacts on both the patient, the staff and their ongoing care. Specifically, this means that the patient\'s medical problems maybe inadequately assessed or treated. Patients who decide to DAMA tend to be young males, from a lower socioeconomic background and with a history of mental health or substance misuse disorder. DAMA has an associated increased risk of morbidity and mortality. In this review of studies across Western healthcare settings, specifically adult medical inpatients, we will review the evidence and seek to address the causes, consequences and possible corrective measures in this common scenario.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:姿势平衡受损等症状,活动性和肌肉力量可以在COVID-19住院后持续12个月,需要更好地理解,因为它们会在日常生活活动中产生影响。
    目标:姿势平衡会发生什么,移动性,
    方法:对男女患者进行前瞻性队列研究,年龄≥18岁,入院诊断为COVID-19。在出院后1、4、6和12个月评估结果,包括:姿势平衡-简短平衡评估系统测试,移动性-定时\"Up&Go\"测试,和手握强度-测力法。通过点估计和95%置信区间计算出姿势平衡和活动性受损以及握力低于预期的患病率值。Shapiro-Wilk检验表明我们的数据没有正态分布,因此采用弗里德曼检验和比例检验进行统计分析。
    结果:出院四个月后,姿势平衡的表现有所改善,但是,只有六个月后,机动性和握力才有所改善。出院6个月后,残疾人的比例开始下降。出院后一个月,姿势平衡和活动能力受损的患病率更高,随着时间的推移而减少。然而,随访12个月后,姿势平衡和活动能力受损的值仍然很高.
    结论:出院后1个月,姿势平衡和行动障碍的患病率很高,出院后12个月仍然很高。握力低于预期的患病率显示出随着时间的推移变化有限。结果强调了评估姿势平衡的必要性,COVID-19后相关住院方案中的活动能力和握力,和长期物理治疗干预措施,以解决这些障碍,当确定,以改善长期结果。
    BACKGROUND: Symptoms such as impairment of postural balance, mobility and muscle strength can last up to 12 months post COVID-19 hospitalization, need to be better understood, as they can have repercussions in activities of daily living.
    OBJECTIVE: What happens to postural balance, mobility, and handgrip strength of COVID-19 patients after hospitalization?
    METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted with patients of both sexes, aged ≥18, admitted to hospital diagnosed with COVID-19. Outcomes were assessed at 1, 4, 6, and 12 months post-discharge, including: postural balance - Brief-Balance Evaluation Systems Test, mobility - Timed \"Up & Go\" Test, and handgrip strength - dynamometry. Prevalence values of impaired postural balance and mobility and lower-than-expected handgrip strength were calculated by point estimate and 95 % confidence interval. Shapiro-Wilk test showed that our data did not have a normal distribution, so the Friedman Test and the test of proportions were used for the statistical analysis.
    RESULTS: Performance on postural balance was improved after four months of hospital discharge, but the improvement in mobility and handgrip strength only occurred after six months. After six months of discharge, the proportion of individuals with impairments began to decrease. A higher prevalence of impairments in postural balance and mobility occurred at one month post-discharge, which reduced over time. However, the values of impairments for postural balance and mobility were still high after 12 months of follow-up.
    CONCLUSIONS: There was a high prevalence of postural balance and mobility impairment 1 month after discharge, which was still high 12 months after discharge. The prevalence of lower-than-expected handgrip strength demonstrated limited change over time. Results highlight the need for assessment of postural balance, mobility and hand grip strength in post COVID-19 related hospitalization protocols, and long-term physical therapy interventions to address these impairments when identified to improve long term outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:感染SARS-CoV-2的住院患者应在几周内康复。然而,即使是轻度版本的人也会出现持续4周或更长时间的症状。这些后COVID-19条件(PCC)包括各种新的,返回,或持续的症状可能持续数月或数年并导致残疾。很少有研究使用感染SARS-CoV-2的出院患者的自我报告来调查PCC,以补充临床和生物标志物研究。
    目的:本研究旨在调查自我报告,在COVID-19大流行的第二波和第三波期间出院的SARS-CoV-2感染患者中持续的PCC。
    方法:我们设计,预先测试,并向2020年10月至2021年4月期间出院的所有符合条件的住院患者发布了一份临时纸质问卷。出院后4个月,我们收集了有关PCC的数据和多维疲劳清单(MFI)的得分,患者健康问卷-4(PHQ-4),简要记忆筛查量表(Q3PC),和创伤后应激障碍量表(PCL-5)。描述性的,推论,和多元线性回归统计评估PCC症状,协会,以及社会人口统计学特征和住院时间(LOS)的差异。我们检查了我们感兴趣的变量是否显着预测MFI得分。
    结果:在返回的1993年有效问卷中,245人来自SARS-CoV-2出院患者(中位年龄71,IQR62.7-77岁)。只有28.2%(69/245)的受访者在4个月后无症状。女性的PCC症状持续明显多于男性(P≤0.001)。住院LOS≥11天的患者也有更多的PCC症状(P<.001)-女性症状更多,LOS更长。在年龄组(18-64岁、65-74岁和≥75岁;P=.50)之间或重症监护病房和其他住院病房之间(P=.09)没有发现显着差异。患者住院期间自我报告的PHQ-4评分明显高于4个月后(P<.001)。四分之三(187/245,76.4%)的受访者报告了记忆力减退和注意力集中障碍(Q3PC)。MFI评分中位数(56,IQR1-3,范围50-60]没有显着差异与社会人口统计学变量相关。住院LOS≥11天的患者PCL-5评分中位数明显较高(P<.001)。多元线性回归使我们能够计算出PHQ-4,Q3PC,和PCL-5得分,根据年龄调整,性别,和LOS(≥11天[中位数2症状,IQR1-5]或<11天),没有显著预测MFI评分(R2=0.09;F4,7=1.5;P=.22;调整后的R2=0.06)。
    结论:大多数感染SARS-CoV-2的住院患者在出院后4个月出现PCC,复杂的临床图片。在此期间,只有三分之一的人没有症状。根据我们的发现,MFI评分与自我报告的抑郁症没有直接关系,焦虑,或者根据年龄调整后的创伤后评分,性别,或LOS。需要进一步的研究来根据感染SARS-CoV-2的出院住院患者的自我报告的健康经验来探索PCC和疲劳。
    BACKGROUND: Hospitalized patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 should recover within a few weeks. However, even those with mild versions can experience symptoms lasting 4 weeks or longer. These post-COVID-19 condition (PCC) comprise various new, returning, or ongoing symptoms that can last for months or years and cause disability. Few studies have investigated PCC using self-reports from discharged patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 to complement clinical and biomarker studies.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate self-reported, persistent PCC among patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 who were discharged during the second and third waves of the COVID-19 pandemic.
    METHODS: We designed, pretested, and posted an ad hoc paper questionnaire to all eligible inpatients discharged between October 2020 and April 2021. At 4 months post discharge, we collected data on PCC and scores for the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI), the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4), a Brief Memory Screening Scale (Q3PC), and a posttraumatic stress disorder scale (PCL-5). Descriptive, inferential, and multivariate linear regression statistics assessed PCC symptomatology, associations, and differences regarding sociodemographic characteristics and hospital length of stay (LOS). We examined whether our variables of interest significantly predicted MFI scores.
    RESULTS: Of the 1993 valid questionnaires returned, 245 were from discharged patients with SARS-CoV-2 (median age 71, IQR 62.7-77 years). Only 28.2% (69/245) of respondents were symptom-free after 4 months. Women had significantly more persistent PCC symptoms than men (P≤.001). Patients with a hospital LOS ≥11 days had more PCC symptoms as well (P<.001)-women had more symptoms and longer LOS. No significant differences were found between age groups (18-64, 65-74, and ≥75 years old; P=.50) or between intensive care units and other hospitalization units (P=.09). Patients self-reported significantly higher PHQ-4 scores during their hospitalization than at 4 months later (P<.001). Three-fourth (187/245, 76.4%) of the respondents reported memory loss and concentration disorders (Q3PC). No significant differences in the median MFI score (56, IQR 1-3, range 50-60]) were associated with sociodemographic variables. Patients with a hospital LOS of ≥11 days had a significantly higher median PCL-5 score (P<.001). Multivariate linear regression allowed us to calculate that the combination of PHQ-4, Q3PC, and PCL-5 scores, adjusted for age, sex, and LOS (of either ≥11 days [median 2 symptoms, IQR 1-5] or <11 days), did not significantly predict MFI scores (R2=0.09; F4,7 =1.5; P=.22; adjusted R2=0.06).
    CONCLUSIONS: The majority of inpatients infected with SARS-CoV-2 presented with PCC 4 months after discharge, with complex clinical pictures. Only one-third of them were symptom-free during that time. Based on our findings, MFI scores were not directly related to self-reported depression, anxiety, or posttraumatic scores adjusted for age, sex, or LOS. Further research is needed to explore PCC and fatigue based on self-reported health experiences of discharged inpatients infected with SARS-CoV-2.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:精神分裂症是一种普遍存在的严重精神障碍,其特征是严重的残疾和高复发率。出院后持续较高的再入院率对治疗该人群提出了严峻的挑战和压力来源。早期识别这种风险对于实施有针对性的干预措施至关重要。本研究旨在开发一种易于使用的预测工具,用于识别中国精神分裂症患者出院后1年内再入院的风险。
    方法:预测模型,基于静态因素,是使用无锡精神卫生中心收治的247名精神分裂症住院患者的数据开发的,中国,2020年7月1日至12月31日。对于内部验证,另有106例患者纳入.多变量Cox回归用于确定独立预测因子,并创建列线图以预测出院后1年内再入院的可能性。使用具有1000个重新采样的自举评估模型在辨别和校准方面的性能。
    结果:多变量cox回归表明非自愿入院(校正风险比[aHR]4.35,95%置信区间[CI]2.13-8.86),重复入院(AHR3.49,95%CI2.08-5.85),抗精神病药复方处方(AHR2.16,95%CI1.34-3.48),病程≥20年(aHR1.80,95%CI1.04-3.12)是精神分裂症患者出院后1年内再入院的独立预测因子.由这四个因子构建的列线图的曲线下面积(AUC)和一致性指数(C指数)在训练集中分别为0.820和0.780,和0.846和0.796的验证集,分别。此外,训练集和验证集的列线图的校准曲线非常接近理想对角线。此外,决策曲线分析(DCA)表明,该模型的净收益明显更好。
    结论:列线图,使用放电前静电因子开发,旨在预测精神分裂症患者出院后1年内再入院的可能性。该工具可以为临床医生提供及时预测和早期管理精神病再入院的准确有效方法。
    BACKGROUND: Schizophrenia is a pervasive and severe mental disorder characterized by significant disability and high rates of recurrence. The persistently high rates of readmission after discharge present a serious challenge and source of stress in treating this population. Early identification of this risk is critical for implementing targeted interventions. The present study aimed to develop an easy-to-use predictive instrument for identifying the risk of readmission within 1-year post-discharge among schizophrenia patients in China.
    METHODS: A prediction model, based on static factors, was developed using data from 247 schizophrenia inpatients admitted to the Mental Health Center in Wuxi, China, from July 1 to December 31, 2020. For internal validation, an additional 106 patients were included. Multivariate Cox regression was applied to identify independent predictors and to create a nomogram for predicting the likelihood of readmission within 1-year post-discharge. The model\'s performance in terms of discrimination and calibration was evaluated using bootstrapping with 1000 resamples.
    RESULTS: Multivariate cox regression demonstrated that involuntary admission (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 4.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.13-8.86), repeat admissions (aHR 3.49, 95% CI 2.08-5.85), the prescription of antipsychotic polypharmacy (aHR 2.16, 95% CI 1.34-3.48), and a course of disease ≥ 20 years (aHR 1.80, 95% CI 1.04-3.12) were independent predictors for the readmission of schizophrenia patients within 1-year post-discharge. The area under the curve (AUC) and concordance index (C-index) of the nomogram constructed from these four factors were 0.820 and 0.780 in the training set, and 0.846 and 0.796 for the validation set, respectively. Furthermore, the calibration curves of the nomogram for both the training and validation sets closely approximated the ideal diagonal line. Additionally, decision curve analyses (DCAs) demonstrated a significantly better net benefit with this model.
    CONCLUSIONS: A nomogram, developed using pre-discharge static factors, was designed to predict the likelihood of readmission within 1-year post-discharge for patients with schizophrenia. This tool may offer clinicians an accurate and effective way for the timely prediction and early management of psychiatric readmissions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    再次入院对患者来说代价高昂,他们的家庭和医疗保健系统。识别和解决风险因素可以减少经历再入院的人数。很少有研究从患者的角度探讨可改变的危险因素,如健康信念,以探讨再入院危险因素的复杂性。这项研究旨在从经历过再入院的患者及其家人的角度确定可修改的再入院风险因素。
    在新西兰一家大型城市医院的普通内科或外科病房出院后30天内再次入院的成年人(≥18岁)被邀请参加半结构化访谈,以探索他们的再次入院经验。在重新入院期间进行了访谈,并使用归纳主题分析法进行了分析。
    总共采访了30名参与者。确定了与重新入院有关的六个主题:卫生专业人员与患者之间的沟通不足,患者对疾病的看法和治疗之间的错位,不清楚或丢失的信息,健康素养差,药物管理不善,和卫生系统因素。
    这些发现突出了考虑患者体验的重要性,比如他们的期望,疾病和治疗信念,减少再入院。确保沟通以患者为中心,优质的专业患者关系可以减少再入院。
    UNASSIGNED: Hospital readmissions are costly for patients, their families and healthcare systems. Identifying and addressing risk factors can reduce the number of people who experience readmission. Few studies have explored modifiable risk factors such as health beliefs from patients\' perspective to explore the complexity of risk factors for readmission. This study aimed to identify modifiable readmission risk factors from the perspectives of patients who have experienced readmission and their families.
    UNASSIGNED: Adults (≥18 years) readmitted within 30 days of discharge to a general medical or surgical ward at a large urban hospital in New Zealand were invited to participate in a semi-structured interview to explore their readmission experience. Interviews were conducted during the readmission and were analysed using inductive thematic analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 30 participants were interviewed. Six themes relating to readmission were identified: inadequate communication between health professionals and patients, misalignment between patient illness perceptions and treatment, unclear or missing information, poor health literacy, poor medication mismanagement, and health system factors.
    UNASSIGNED: These findings highlight the importance of considering patient experiences, such as their expectations, illness and treatment beliefs, to reduce readmissions. Ensuring communication is patient centred and quality professional-patient relationships could reduce readmissions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究的目的是探讨护理接受者临床因素在护理伴侣准备与护理伴侣希望在出院时痴呆症患者寻求长期护理入院之间的关系中的中介作用。
    这项研究分析了以家庭为中心的以功能为中心的护理(Fam-FFC)的数据,其中包括424名护理接受者和护理伴侣。多重调解模型通过护理接受者的临床因素(痴呆的行为和心理症状[BPSD],研究了护理伴侣准备对寻求长期护理的愿望的间接影响。合并症,谵妄严重程度,物理功能,和认知)。
    谵妄严重程度和身体功能部分介导了护理伙伴准备与护理伙伴寻求长期护理的意愿之间的关系(B=-.011;95%CI=-.019,-.003和B=-.013;95%CI=-.027,-.001,分别)。
    干预措施应加强护理伙伴的准备,并解决住院痴呆症患者的谵妄严重程度和身体功能,以防止出院时不必要的疗养院安置。
    将护理伴侣的准备和护理接受者的临床因素(谵妄严重程度和身体机能)纳入出院计划可以最大程度地减少护理伴侣寻求长期护理的愿望。
    UNASSIGNED: The purpose of this study was to explore the mediating roles of care receiver clinical factors on the relationship between care partner preparedness and care partner desire to seek long-term care admission for persons living with dementia at hospital discharge.
    UNASSIGNED: This study analyzed data from the Family centered Function-focused Care (Fam-FFC), which included 424 care receiver and care partner dyads. A multiple mediation model examined the indirect effects of care partner preparedness on the desire to seek long-term care through care receiver clinical factors (behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia [BPSD], comorbidities, delirium severity, physical function, and cognition).
    UNASSIGNED: Delirium severity and physical function partially mediated the relationship between care partner preparedness and care partner desire to seek long-term care admission (B = -.011; 95% CI = -.019, -.003, and B = -.013; 95% CI = -.027, -.001, respectively).
    UNASSIGNED: Interventions should enhance care partner preparedness and address delirium severity and physical function in hospitalized persons with dementia to prevent unwanted nursing home placement at hospital discharge.
    UNASSIGNED: Integrating care partner preparedness and care receiver clinical factors (delirium severity and physical function) into discharge planning may minimize care partner desire to seek long-term care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    多项研究探索了患者的需求和经历,家庭成员,和医疗保健专业人员关于医院到家庭的过渡。我们的研究旨在确定,批判性评价,并在定性的荟萃综合中总结这些研究。
    Medline,从开始到2024年6月,对CINAHL和Embase进行了系统搜索,以确定合格的文章。纳入了定性研究,并使用关键评估技能计划进行了严格评估。不包括质量不足的论文。在(1)由两名独立研究人员进行开放编码和(2)在反身会议期间讨论代码之后,我们进行了元合成。
    对98项研究进行了评估,其中包括53个。我们达到了主题饱和,构建了四个主题:(1)护理协调和连续性,(2)沟通,(3)患者和家庭参与,(4)个性化支持和信息交流。对于患者和家属来说,定制的信息和支持是出院后无缝过渡和最佳恢复轨迹的先决条件。医疗保健专业人员必须在护理环境内和跨护理环境进行有效沟通,以确保多学科协作和护理连续性。
    这项研究确定了最佳过渡护理的基本要素。当(重新)设计过渡性护理干预措施以确保出院后的护理连续性时,这些发现可能会支持研究人员和医疗保健专业人员。
    患者及其家属需要获得量身定制的信息和支持,从医院到家庭的无缝过渡的先决条件专业人员必须在医院和初级保健设置内部和之间进行有效的沟通。应澄清专业角色,以确保出院后的有效协作和持续的高质量护理。需要解决协调和沟通的综合联合卫生途径,以确保无缝过渡。
    UNASSIGNED: Multiple studies have explored the needs and experiences of patients, family members, and healthcare professionals regarding hospital-to-home transitions. Our study aimed to identify, critically appraise, and summarize these studies in a qualitative meta-synthesis.
    UNASSIGNED: Medline, CINAHL and Embase were systematically searched to identify eligible articles from inception to June 2024. Qualitative studies were included and critically appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program. Insufficient-quality papers were excluded. We performed a meta-synthesis following (1) open coding by two independent researchers and (2) discussing codes during reflexivity meetings.
    UNASSIGNED: Ninety-eight studies were appraised, of which 53 were included. We reached thematic saturation, four themes were constructed: (1) care coordination and continuity, (2) communication, (3) patient and family involvement, and (4) individualized support and information exchange. For patients and families, tailored information and support are prerequisites for a seamless transition and an optimal recovery trajectory after hospital discharge. It is imperative that healthcare professionals communicate effectively within and across care settings to ensure multidisciplinary collaboration and care continuity.
    UNASSIGNED: This study identifies essential elements of optimal transitional care. These findings could be supportive to researchers and healthcare professionals when (re)designing transitional care interventions to ensure care continuity after hospital discharge.
    Patients and their families need to receive tailored information and support, which are prerequisites for a seamless transition from hospital to homeProfessionals must communicate effectively within and across hospital and primary care settingsProfessional roles should be clarified to ensure effective collaboration and continued high-quality care after hospital discharge.Integrated allied health pathways addressing coordination and communication are needed to ensure seamless transitions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:越来越多的国家报告阿片类镇痛药的使用和危害急剧增加。在术后患者中观察到新阿片类药物的高发生率。作为回应,各三级医疗机构制定了阿片类药物退出计划(OEP),以遏制潜在的阿片类药物相关危害.
    方法:系统搜索PubMed和Embase,总结,并比较了2000年1月1日至2024年6月4日发表的术后患者人群的OEP介入要素。两名研究人员根据PRISMA2020指南独立筛选了这些文章的资格,提取数据,并评估研究质量和偏倚风险。对研究特征进行了数据合成,干预细节,功效,和发展。
    结果:共筛选了2,585篇文章,其中八个符合资格标准。所有研究均在北美进行,重点是全髋关节或膝关节置换术(n=5)或神经外科(n=3)后的骨科手术患者。大多数研究(n=7)包括pre-post(n=4)或随机临床设计(n=3)。三项研究质量很好,没有一个有偏见的风险很低。干预措施各不相同,范围从教育课程(n=1)到个性化的锥形协议(n=4)或两者的组合(n=2)。关键要素是关于如何预测患者术后对阿片类镇痛药的需求以及基于24小时出院前阿片类药物消耗的逐渐减少策略的说明。六项研究将疗效作为其分析的终点,其中四个评估了统计学意义,4人都确认OEP成功减少了术后阿片类药物的使用.
    结论:尽管在设计和实现方面存在差异,经鉴定的OEP表明,它们可有效减少门诊阿片类药物的消耗.它们提供了术后镇痛需求的可靠估计以及逐渐减少持续时间和速率的基本原理。然而,需要更严格的研究来评估它们在现实世界中的有效性。
    BACKGROUND: A growing number of countries have reported sharp increases in the use and harm of opioid analgesics. High rates of new opioid initiation are observed in postoperative patients. In response, various tertiary care institutions have developed opioid exit plans (OEPs) to curb potential opioid-related harm.
    METHODS: PubMed and Embase were systematically searched to identify, summarize, and compare the interventional elements of OEPs for postoperative patient populations published from January 1, 2000, to June 4, 2024. Two researchers independently screened the articles for eligibility following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, extracted the data, and assessed the study quality and risk of bias. Data synthesis was performed for study characteristics, intervention details, efficacy, and development.
    RESULTS: A total of 2,585 articles were screened, eight of which met the eligibility criteria. All studies were conducted in North America and focused on orthopedic surgery patients following total hip or knee arthroplasty (n = 5) or neurosurgery (n = 3). Most studies (n = 7) included a pre-post (n = 4) or randomized clinical design (n = 3). Three studies were of good quality, and none had a low risk of bias. The interventions varied and ranged from educational sessions (n = 1) to individualized tapering protocols (n = 4) or a combination of the two (n = 2). Key elements were instructions on how to anticipate patients\' postoperative need for opioid analgesics and tapering strategies based on 24-h predischarge opioid consumption. Six studies included efficacy as an endpoint in their analysis, of which four assessed statistical significance, with all four identifying that the OEPs were successful in reducing postoperative opioid use.
    CONCLUSIONS: Despite differences in design and implementation, the identified OEPs suggest that they are efficacious in reducing outpatient opioid consumption. They provide a robust estimate of postoperative analgesic requirements and a rationale for tapering duration and rate. However, more rigorous studies are needed to evaluate their real-world effectiveness.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:确定当前具有长半衰期脂糖肽(LGP)的实践以及奥利万星的潜在用途/位置。
    结果:尽管其适应症仅限于皮肤和软组织感染(STTI),长半衰期脂糖肽主要用于治疗骨和关节感染(BJIs)和感染性心内膜炎。Oritavancin和dalbavancin都是半合成脂糖肽抗生素,具有抗革兰氏阳性生物的活性。这两种抗生素的改变游戏规则的特性是它们的一次性给药。由于其半衰期较短,oritavancin可能比dalbavancin有优势,治疗时间少于2周,因为它既可以用于BJIs复杂患者的长期治疗,也可以作为革兰氏阳性球菌感染的单剂量治疗,通常通过5至10天的抗生素疗程治疗。这些感染包括尿路感染,菌血症,导管相关感染,等。除了可能用作治疗结束注射外,oritavancin可用作术后期间的经验性治疗,尤其是与装置相关的人工关节感染,以便患者早期出院.
    方法:2022年3月进行了一项定性调查,包括16名感染学家,一个内科医生,五名医院药剂师,还有一位药理学家.
    结论:长半衰期的脂糖肽有助于改变急性细菌感染的管理模式,因为感染学家现在考虑一种单一药物的一系列适应症和患者概况。Oritavancin加强了从BJI到尿路感染的众多感染的治疗武器库,并有助于管理特定的临床情况,除了为医院的预算提供潜在的好处。
    OBJECTIVE: To identify the current practices with long half-life lipoglycopeptides (LGPs) and potential use/position of oritavancin.
    RESULTS: Despite their indication being limited to skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs), long half-life lipoglycopeptides are mainly used off-label to treat bone and joint infections (BJIs) and infective endocarditis. Oritavancin and dalbavancin are both semisynthetic lipoglycopeptide antibiotics with activity against Gram-positive organisms. The game-changing property of these two antibiotics is their one-time dosing. Due to its shorter half-life, oritavancin might have an advantage over dalbavancin for a treatment duration of less than 2 weeks, as it could be used both in prolonged treatments of complicated patients in BJIs or administered as a single-dose treatment for Gram-positive cocci infections usually treated by a 5- to 10-day antibiotic course. These infections include urinary tract infections, bacteremias, catheter-related infections, etc. In addition to the possibility of being used as an end-of-treatment injection, oritavancin could be used as an empiric therapy treatment in the postoperative period in the context of device-associated especially prosthetic joint infections to allow for the early discharge of the patient.
    METHODS: A qualitative survey was conducted in March 2022 including sixteen infectiologists, one internist, five hospital pharmacists, and one pharmacologist.
    CONCLUSIONS: Long half-life lipoglycopeptides contribute to changing the paradigm in the management of acute bacterial infections, as infectiologists now consider a range of indications and patient profiles for one single drug. Oritavancin strengthens the therapeutic arsenal in numerous infections from BJIs to urinary tract infections and could help to manage specific clinical situations, on top of providing potential benefits for the hospital\'s budget.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号