engagement

参与度
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    为了成功结束美国的艾滋病毒流行,疾病控制和预防中心(CDC)专注于提供科学证明的组合,成本效益高,以及针对优先人群的可扩展干预措施。在一些社区,系统性因素继续导致持续的健康差距和不成比例的更高的艾滋病毒诊断率。国家艾滋病毒/艾滋病战略已将顺式性别黑人妇女(CgBW)指定为优先人群,以解决艾滋病毒中的种族和族裔不平等问题。本报告介绍了项目组合,programs,以及由CDC的艾滋病毒预防司(DHP)资助的倡议,以解决艾滋病毒方面的差距,并改善CgBW之间的健康和生活质量。这些资助的活动包括,规划,和实施艾滋病毒预防计划,大众媒体宣传,行为干预侧重于CgBW。本报告还总结了DHP的社区参与,能力建设,和伙伴关系的努力,并重点介绍了以CgBW为重点的研究和监测活动。最后,这份报告概述了疾病预防控制中心努力改善艾滋病毒检测的未来方向,治疗,以及在美国预防CgBW。
    To succeed in ending the HIV epidemic in the United States, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) focuses on delivering combinations of scientifically proven, cost-effective, and scalable interventions to priority populations. Systemic factors continue to contribute to persistent health disparities and disproportionately higher rates of HIV diagnosis in some communities. The National HIV/AIDS Strategy has designated cis-gender Black women (CgBW) as a priority population to address the racial and ethnic inequities in HIV. This report presents the portfolio of projects, programs, and initiatives funded by the CDC\'s Division of HIV Prevention (DHP) to address disparities in HIV and improve health and QOL among CgBW. These funded activities include the development, planning, and implementation of HIV prevention programs, mass media campaigns, and behavioral interventions focused on CgBW. This report also summarizes DHP\'s community engagement, capacity building, and partnership efforts, and highlights research and surveillance activities focusing on CgBW. Finally, this report outlines future directions for CDC\'s efforts to improve access to HIV testing, treatment, and prevention for CgBW in the United States.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    COVID-19大流行促使教育进行调整,提高对学生能力成就的关注。尽管有这些变化,像学生参与(SE)这样的方面,基本需求满足(BNF),在以社区为基础的临床实践中,护理学生的压力水平(SL)仍未得到充分研究。
    本研究旨在考察学生能力成就(SCA)之间的关系,学生参与,满足基本需求,以及在COVID-19大流行期间从事社区临床实践的护理学生的压力水平。
    和方法:对来自印度尼西亚的451名护生进行了横断面在线调查,马来西亚,和印度。评估SCA的在线问卷,SE,BNF,和SL在2021年11月至12月期间管理。
    这项研究涉及来自印度尼西亚的131名参与者,来自马来西亚的138182名来自印度,平均年龄22.52岁.多变量分析,采用线性回归表明,在这三个国家,在线学生参与显示与SCA的相关性最强(B:0.701;p值:0.0001)。然而,具体因素-压力水平,学习方法,研究年份在印度尼西亚显示出更大的相关性,印度,马来西亚,分别。
    COVID-19大流行显着影响了护理专业学生在临床实践中的教学和学习经验。加强学术讲师和学生之间的在线参与对于实现临床能力至关重要。
    UNASSIGNED: The COVID-19 pandemic prompted adjustments in education, raising concerns about students\' competency achievement. Despite these changes, aspects like student engagement (SE), basic needs fulfillment (BNF), and stress levels (SL) in nursing students during community-based clinical practice remain understudied.
    UNASSIGNED: This study aims to examine the relationships between students\' competencies achievement (SCA), student engagement, basic needs fulfillment, and stress levels among nursing students engaging in community-based clinical practice during the COVID-19 pandemic.
    UNASSIGNED: and Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted with 451 nursing students from Indonesia, Malaysia, and India. Online questionnaires assessing SCA, SE, BNF, and SL were administered between November and December 2021.
    UNASSIGNED: The study involved 131 participants from Indonesia, 138 from Malaysia, and 182 from India, with an average age of 22.52. Multivariate analysis, employing linear regression revealed that across the three countries, online student engagement demonstrated the strongest association with SCA (B: 0.701; p-value: 0.0001). However, specific factors-stress levels, learning methods, and study year-showed greater relevance in Indonesia, India, and Malaysia, respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: The COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted nursing students\' teaching and learning experiences during clinical practice. Enhancing online engagement between academic lecturers and students is imperative for attaining clinical competencies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:COVID-19大流行的社会隔离措施影响了教学工作。在“紧急远程教学”(ERT)上下文中,探讨影响教师自我效能感的因素。
    方法:来自西班牙南部学校的总共289名教师参加了这项研究。他们被问及他们的倦怠程度,订婚,和韧性。根据性别分组进行比较,他们所属的中心类型,学校社会背景,以及教师所教授的教育水平。使用结构方程模型,与倦怠相关的变量之间的多变量关系,订婚,描述了韧性。
    结果:在ERT期间,教师自我效能感受到3个因素的影响:倦怠-疲惫和愤世嫉俗-投入,和韧性。在ERT期间,半私人和私人中心的教师表现出更高的自我效能感。反过来,儿童和初等教育教师的工作投入水平明显高于义务教育和义务教育后中等教育教师。
    结论:在大流行现象的特殊性和普遍全球性以及对教学功能的社会价值的复杂自我感知的背景下,讨论了与ERT有关的结果。
    BACKGROUND: Social isolation measures by the COVID-19 pandemic have impacted teaching work. In an \"Emergency Remote Teaching\" (ERT) context, it is relevant to investigate the factors that affect teachers\' self-efficacy.
    METHODS: A total of 289 teachers from schools in southern Spain have participated in this study. They have been asked about their levels of burnout, engagement, and resilience. Comparisons were made by groups in accordance with sex, type of center they belonged to, school social context, and educational level in which the teacher taught. Using a Structural Equations Model, the multivariate relationships between the variables related to burnout, engagement, and resilience were described.
    RESULTS: During the ERT, teachers\' self-efficacy was influenced by the 3 factors: burnout-exhaustion and cynicism-engagement, and resilience. During the ERT, the teachers in semi-private and private centers showed greater self-efficacy. In turn, the teachers in childhood and primary education showed a significantly higher level of work engagement than the teachers in compulsory and post-compulsory secondary education.
    CONCLUSIONS: The results in relation to ERT are discussed in the context of the exceptionality and universal globality of the pandemic phenomenon and the complex self-perception of the social value of the teaching function.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:需要采取干预措施,以解决服用甲基苯丙胺的人寻求治疗的延误和治疗覆盖率低的问题。
    目的:我们的目标是确定基于智能手机的自我管理干预措施是否,“S-Check应用程序”可以增加寻求帮助和改变甲基苯丙胺使用的动机,并确定与应用参与度相关的因素。
    方法:这项研究是一项随机的,28天候补名单控制试验。居住在澳大利亚的同意成年人在上个月至少使用过一次甲基苯丙胺,有资格从Android或iOS应用程序商店免费下载该应用程序。那些随机分配到干预组的人可以立即访问S-Check应用程序,对照组在获得访问之前等待了28天,然后所有人都可以进入,直到第56天。实际寻求帮助和寻求帮助的意图通过修改后的实际寻求帮助问卷(MAHSQ)进行评估,修改后的一般帮助寻求问卷,以及修改后的准备统治者改变甲基苯丙胺使用的动机。对MAHSQ的阳性反应比例的χ2比较,修改后的一般帮助寻求问卷,两组之间进行了修改的准备标尺。Logistic回归模型比较了实际求助的几率,寻求帮助的意图,以及在第28天两组之间改变的动机。次要结果是应用程序最常访问的功能,甲基苯丙胺的使用,应用程序的可行性和可接受性,以及S-Check应用程序参与度与参与者人口统计和甲基苯丙胺使用特征之间的关联。
    结果:总计,560名参与者下载了应用程序;259名(46.3%)完成了eConsent和基线;84名(32.4%)在第28天提供数据。与对照组相比,即时访问组的参与者在第28天更有可能寻求专业帮助(MAHSQ)(n=15,45.5%vsn=12,23.5%;χ21=4.42,P=.04)。实际寻求帮助的几率没有显着差异,寻求帮助的意图,在主要逻辑回归分析中,或改变两组之间甲基苯丙胺使用的动机,而在辅助分析中,估算的数据集显示,与等候组对照组相比,即时访问组参与者寻求专业帮助的几率存在显著差异(调整后比值比2.64,95%CI1.19-5.83,P=.02).对于未在基线寻求帮助的参与者,应用中的每一分钟都会使第28天寻求专业帮助的可能性增加8%(比率1.08,95%CI1.02-1.22,P=.04).在干预组中,应用参与时间增加10分钟与甲基苯丙胺使用天数减少0.4天相关(回归系数[β]-0.04,P=.02).
    结论:对于消耗甲基苯丙胺的澳大利亚成年人,S-Check应用程序是一种可行的低资源自我管理干预措施。研究人员很高,虽然在移动健康干预中很常见,保证对S-Check应用程序进行更大规模的研究。
    背景:澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心ACTRN12619000534189;https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=377288&isReview=true。
    BACKGROUND: Interventions are required that address delays in treatment-seeking and low treatment coverage among people consuming methamphetamine.
    OBJECTIVE: We aim to determine whether a self-administered smartphone-based intervention, the \"S-Check app\" can increase help-seeking and motivation to change methamphetamine use, and determine factors associated with app engagement.
    METHODS: This study is a randomized, 28-day waitlist-controlled trial. Consenting adults residing in Australia who reported using methamphetamine at least once in the last month were eligible to download the app for free from Android or iOS app stores. Those randomized to the intervention group had immediate access to the S-Check app, the control group was wait-listed for 28 days before gaining access, and then all had access until day 56. Actual help-seeking and intention to seek help were assessed by the modified Actual Help Seeking Questionnaire (mAHSQ), modified General Help Seeking Questionnaire, and motivation to change methamphetamine use by the modified readiness ruler. χ2 comparisons of the proportion of positive responses to the mAHSQ, modified General Help Seeking Questionnaire, and modified readiness ruler were conducted between the 2 groups. Logistic regression models compared the odds of actual help-seeking, intention to seek help, and motivation to change at day 28 between the 2 groups. Secondary outcomes were the most commonly accessed features of the app, methamphetamine use, feasibility and acceptability of the app, and associations between S-Check app engagement and participant demographic and methamphetamine use characteristics.
    RESULTS: In total, 560 participants downloaded the app; 259 (46.3%) completed eConsent and baseline; and 84 (32.4%) provided data on day 28. Participants in the immediate access group were more likely to seek professional help (mAHSQ) at day 28 than those in the control group (n=15, 45.5% vs n=12, 23.5%; χ21=4.42, P=.04). There was no significant difference in the odds of actual help-seeking, intention to seek help, or motivation to change methamphetamine use between the 2 groups on the primary logistic regression analyses, while in the ancillary analyses, the imputed data set showed a significant difference in the odds of seeking professional help between participants in the immediate access group compared to the waitlist control group (adjusted odds ratio 2.64, 95% CI 1.19-5.83, P=.02). For participants not seeking help at baseline, each minute in the app increased the likelihood of seeking professional help by day 28 by 8% (ratio 1.08, 95% CI 1.02-1.22, P=.04). Among the intervention group, a 10-minute increase in app engagement time was associated with a decrease in days of methamphetamine use by 0.4 days (regression coefficient [β] -0.04, P=.02).
    CONCLUSIONS: The S-Check app is a feasible low-resource self-administered intervention for adults in Australia who consume methamphetamine. Study attrition was high and, while common in mobile health interventions, warrants larger studies of the S-Check app.
    BACKGROUND: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12619000534189; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=377288&isReview=true.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:牛跛行是畜牧业面临的重大福利和经济问题。已发表的研究调查了奶牛群中的足部修剪做法,但是对牛群的做法知之甚少。因此,这项研究的目的是获得有关英国境内肉牛的专业牛脚修剪器当前做法的信息。
    方法:使用联合信息系统委员会平台创建了一个包含16个问题的在线调查。该调查已开放3个月。
    结果:接受预防性足部修剪的奶牛和肉牛的比例之间存在显着差异(p<0.05)。数字皮炎是受访者修剪跛脚牛肉动物时最常见的跛脚原因,其次是白线病。提出了对脚部修剪者对牛肉农场参与障碍的看法的主题分析,除了他们对兽医参与牛肉跛行的意见。
    结论:分布偏差可能影响了结果,因为该调查是在牛蹄护理标准委员会和全国牛蹄修剪协会的支持下在线分发的。不属于任何专业机构的脚部修剪器的百分比是未知的。
    结论:进一步研究跛行对奶牛和育成牛的影响,包括调查减少牛肉系统跛行的预防措施,是有保证的。
    BACKGROUND: Cattle lameness is a significant welfare and economic problem facing the livestock industry. Published research has investigated foot trimming practices in dairy herds, but little is known about the practices in beef herds. Therefore, the objective of this study was to obtain information about the current practices of professional cattle foot trimmers concerning beef cattle within the UK.
    METHODS: An online survey comprising 16 questions was created using the Joint Information Systems Committee platform. The survey was open for 3 months.
    RESULTS: There was a significant difference (p < 0.05) between the proportions of dairy cattle and beef cattle receiving preventative foot trims. Digital dermatitis was the most commonly recorded cause of lameness when a lame beef animal was trimmed by the respondents, followed by white line disease. A thematic analysis of foot trimmers\' opinions of barriers to engagement on beef farms is presented, in addition to their opinions on veterinary involvement with beef lameness.
    CONCLUSIONS: Distribution bias may have affected the results, as the survey was distributed online with support from the Cattle Hoof Care Standards Board and the National Association of Cattle Hoof Trimmers. The percentage of foot trimmers not affiliated with either professional body is not known.
    CONCLUSIONS: Further research on the impact of lameness on suckler and finishing cattle, including investigations into preventative actions to reduce lameness in beef systems, is warranted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:COVID-19大流行给个人和家庭带来了额外的心理健康负担,导致广泛的服务访问问题。数字心理健康干预措施有望改善可访问性。最近的评论显示了个人使用的新证据和多用户的早期证据。然而,数字心理健康干预措施的流失率仍然很高,和额外的复杂性存在时,多个家庭成员在一起。
    目标:因此,本范围审查旨在详细介绍为家庭使用设计的数字心理健康干预措施的报告证据,重点是促进可访问性和参与度并使家庭共同完成的构建和设计特征。
    方法:MEDLINE系统文献检索,Embase,PsycINFO,WebofScience,对2002年1月至2024年3月以英语发表的文章进行了和CINAHL数据库。合格的记录包括对数字平台的实证研究,其中包含一些旨在由相关人员共同完成的元素,以及一些旨在在没有治疗师参与的情况下完成的组件。已记录临床证据的病例包括平台。
    结果:在所审查的9527篇论文中,85(0.89%)符合资格标准。总共确定了24个供相关方共同使用的独特平台。参与者之间的关系包括夫妻,父子二元组合,家庭照顾者护理接受者,和家庭。常见的平台功能包括通过结构化干预来交付内容,而无需提供最少的剪裁或个性化。一些干预措施提供了与治疗师的现场接触。用户参与度指标和调查结果各不相同,包括用户体验,满意,完成率,和可行性。我们的发现对于文献中没有的比现在的更显著。与预期相反,很少有研究报告任何设计和建造特征,使联排。没有研究报告关于实现共同完成的平台功能或确保个人隐私和安全的考虑因素。没有人检查平台构建或设计特征作为干预效果的调节者,没有人对平台本身进行形成性评估。
    结论:在数字心理健康平台设计的早期时代,这项新颖的评论表明,与多个相关用户在治疗过程的任何方面的成功参与相关的设计元素的信息明显缺失。在详细介绍和评估平台设计的文献中仍然存在很大差距,突出未来跨学科研究的重要机会。这篇综述详细介绍了开展此类研究的动机;提出了构建供家庭使用的数字心理健康平台时的设计考虑因素;并为未来的发展提供了建议,包括平台协同设计和形成性评价。
    BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic placed an additional mental health burden on individuals and families, resulting in widespread service access problems. Digital mental health interventions suggest promise for improved accessibility. Recent reviews have shown emerging evidence for individual use and early evidence for multiusers. However, attrition rates remain high for digital mental health interventions, and additional complexities exist when engaging multiple family members together.
    OBJECTIVE: As such, this scoping review aims to detail the reported evidence for digital mental health interventions designed for family use with a focus on the build and design characteristics that promote accessibility and engagement and enable cocompletion by families.
    METHODS: A systematic literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and CINAHL databases was conducted for articles published in the English language from January 2002 to March 2024. Eligible records included empirical studies of digital platforms containing some elements designed for cocompletion by related people as well as some components intended to be completed without therapist engagement. Platforms were included in cases in which clinical evidence had been documented.
    RESULTS: Of the 9527 papers reviewed, 85 (0.89%) met the eligibility criteria. A total of 24 unique platforms designed for co-use by related parties were identified. Relationships between participants included couples, parent-child dyads, family caregiver-care recipient dyads, and families. Common platform features included the delivery of content via structured interventions with no to minimal tailoring or personalization offered. Some interventions provided live contact with therapists. User engagement indicators and findings varied and included user experience, satisfaction, completion rates, and feasibility. Our findings are more remarkable for what was absent in the literature than what was present. Contrary to expectations, few studies reported any design and build characteristics that enabled coparticipation. No studies reported on platform features for enabling cocompletion or considerations for ensuring individual privacy and safety. None examined platform build or design characteristics as moderators of intervention effect, and none offered a formative evaluation of the platform itself.
    CONCLUSIONS: In this early era of digital mental health platform design, this novel review demonstrates a striking absence of information about design elements associated with the successful engagement of multiple related users in any aspect of a therapeutic process. There remains a large gap in the literature detailing and evaluating platform design, highlighting a significant opportunity for future cross-disciplinary research. This review details the incentive for undertaking such research; suggests design considerations when building digital mental health platforms for use by families; and offers recommendations for future development, including platform co-design and formative evaluation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:年轻人的行为使他们有患皮肤癌的风险。通过社交媒体传播数字健康促进干预措施是一种潜在的有前途的策略,可以通过增加紫外线辐射(UVR)保护和皮肤癌检查来改变皮肤癌风险行为。
    目的:本研究旨在比较3种旨在改变紫外线照射的数字干预措施,防晒,和皮肤癌检测行为在中高危人群中。
    方法:本研究是2种积极干预措施的混合II型有效性实施随机对照试验,数字皮肤癌风险降低干预措施(UV4。我[基本])与增强版本(UV4。me2[增强]),和一本电子小册子(e-pamphlet)。在一年的时间里,对主要通过Facebook和Instagram招募的1369名美国年轻人进行了干预效果评估。鼓励干预参与和行为改变的增强措施包括更全面的目标设定活动,与先前建立的调解员相关的持续主动消息传递(例如,自我效能)的UVR暴露和保护,模块完成的嵌入式激励措施,以及正在进行的新闻和视频更新。通过线性回归评估的主要结果效果是UVR暴露和防晒和防护习惯。通过逻辑回归评估的次要结果效果是皮肤自我检查,医生皮肤检查,防晒霜的使用,室内鞣制,还有晒伤.
    结果:与电子小册子相比,积极干预措施增加了防晒(基本:P=.02;增强:P<.001)和习惯性防晒(基本:P=.04;增强P=.01)。增强的干预比基本的干预增加了更多的防晒。每次主动干预在3个月的随访中增加了防晒霜的使用(基本:P=.03;增强:P=.01),并在1年时进行皮肤自我检查(基本:P=.04;增强:P=.004),与电子小册子相比。其他干预效果以及基本干预效果和增强干预效果之间的差异不显着。
    结论:积极干预措施可有效改善多种皮肤癌风险和皮肤癌预防行为。与基础干预相比,加强干预增加了防晒的改善,但没有其他行为。未来的分析将探索干预参与(例如,审查内容的比例)。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.govNCT03313492;http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03313492。
    BACKGROUND: Young adults engage in behaviors that place them at risk for skin cancer. Dissemination of digital health promotion interventions via social media is a potentially promising strategy to modify skin cancer risk behaviors by increasing UV radiation (UVR) protection and skin cancer examinations.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare 3 digital interventions designed to modify UVR exposure, sun protection, and skin cancer detection behaviors among young adults at moderate to high risk of skin cancer.
    METHODS: This study was a hybrid type II effectiveness-implementation randomized controlled trial of 2 active interventions, a digital skin cancer risk reduction intervention (UV4.me [basic]) compared with an enhanced version (UV4.me2 [enhanced]), and an electronic pamphlet (e-pamphlet). Intervention effects were assessed over the course of a year among 1369 US young adults recruited primarily via Facebook and Instagram. Enhancements to encourage intervention engagement and behavior change included more comprehensive goal-setting activities, ongoing proactive messaging related to previously established mediators (eg, self-efficacy) of UVR exposure and protection, embedded incentives for module completion, and ongoing news and video updates. Primary outcome effects assessed via linear regression were UVR exposure and sun protection and protection habits. Secondary outcome effects assessed via logistic regression were skin self-exams, physician skin exams, sunscreen use, indoor tanning, and sunburn.
    RESULTS: The active interventions increased sun protection (basic: P=.02; enhanced: P<.001) and habitual sun protection (basic: P=.04; enhanced P=.01) compared with the e-pamphlet. The enhanced intervention increased sun protection more than the basic one. Each active intervention increased sunscreen use at the 3-month follow-up (basic: P=.03; enhanced: P=.01) and skin self-exam at 1 year (basic: P=.04; enhanced: P=.004), compared with the e-pamphlet. Other intervention effects and differences between the Basic and Enhanced Intervention effects were nonsignificant.
    CONCLUSIONS: The active interventions were effective in improving several skin cancer risk and skin cancer prevention behaviors. Compared with the basic intervention, the enhanced intervention added to the improvement in sun protection but not other behaviors. Future analyses will explore intervention engagement (eg, proportion of content reviewed).
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03313492; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03313492.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号