BACKGROUND: A key decision facing nonthrombectomy capable (spoke) hospitals is whether to transfer a suspected large vessel occlusion (LVO) patient to a comprehensive stroke center (CSC). In a retrospective cohort study, we investigated the rate of transfers resulting in endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) and associated costs before and after implementation of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based software.
METHODS: All patients with a final diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke presenting across a five-spoke community hospital network in affiliation with a CSC were included. The Viz LVO (Viz.ai, Inc.) software was implemented across the spokes with image sharing and messaging between providers across sites. In a cohort of patients before (pre-AI, December 2018-October 2020) and after (post-AI, October 2020-August 2022) implementation, we compared the EVT rate among ischemic stroke patients transferred out of our health system to the CSC. Secondary outcomes included the EVT rate based on spoke computed tomography angiography (CTA) and estimated transfer costs.
RESULTS: A total of 3113 consecutive eligible patients (mean age 71 years, 50% female) presented to the spoke hospitals with 162 transfers pre-AI and 127 post-AI. The rate of transfers treated with EVT significantly increased (32.1% pre-AI vs. 45.7% post-AI, p = 0.02). There was a sharp increase in CTA use post-AI at the spoke hospitals for all patients and transfers that likely contributed to the increased EVT transfer rate, but prior spoke CTA use alone was not sufficient to account for all improvement in EVT transfer rate (37.2% pre-AI vs. 49.2% post-AI, p = 0.12). In a binary logistic regression model, the odds of an EVT transfer in the intervention period were 1.85 greater as compared to preintervention (adjusted odds ratio 1.85, 95% confidence interval 1.12-3.06). The decrease in non-EVT transfers resulted in an estimated annual benefit of $206,121 in spoke revenue and $119,921 in payor savings (all US dollars).
CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of an automated image interpretation and communication platform was associated with increased CTA use, more transfers treated with EVT, and potential economic benefits.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and preoperative levels of neutrophils and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients following endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), and to assess the predictive value of preoperative levels of neutrophils and LDL-C.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical records of patients diagnosed with AIS who underwent EVT at Nanchong Central Hospital between 2019 and 2023. Multivariate regression analysis was employed to examine the association of preoperative levels of neutrophils and LDL-C with the occurrence of ICH. Furthermore, a receiver operating characteristic curve was constructed to assess the predictive efficacy of these parameters.
RESULTS: A total of 300 patients with a mean age of 68.0 years (standard deviation, 11.1 years) and a median baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke scale (NIHSS) score of 15.5 (interquartile range, 12.0-19.75) were identified in this cohort. Of these, 28 (9.3%) patients experienced ICH. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that elevated preoperative neutrophil (odds ratio [OR] 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10-1.38, P < 0.001) and LDL-C (OR 2.64, 95% CI 1.52-4.58, P < 0.001) levels were independently associated with ICH. The combined indicator demonstrated a higher area under the curve (AUC 0.759, 95% CI 0.654-0.865) compared with preoperative neutrophil (AUC 0.647, 95% CI 0.532-0.763) and LDL-C (AUC 0.711, 95% CI 0.607-0.814) levels individually.The specificity and sensitivity of the combined indicator were 67.9% and 83.1%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative levels of neutrophils and LDL-C may serve as predictive indicators for ICH in patients with AIS who have undergone EVT; moreover, the combination of preoperative neutrophil and LDL-C levels demonstrates enhanced predictive efficacy.

UNASSIGNED: The clinical impact of patient selection using FLAIR vascular hyperintensity (FVH)-diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) mismatch for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in patients who have been symptomatic for over 6 h remains unclear. Herein, a retrospective study was conducted to compare the inter-rater reliability and clinical outcomes of patients selected for thrombectomy based on FVH-DWI mismatch with perfusion.
UNASSIGNED: Patients with anterior-circulation large-vessel occlusion selected simultaneously with MRI and perfusion imaging in the late time window from a single-center retrospective study were categorized into EVT-applicable (FVH-DWI mismatch on MRI or perfusion imaging meeting the DEFUSE3 standards) and EVT-inapplicable groups based on MRI and perfusion imaging. The primary outcome was the 90-day functional independence rate. Safety outcomes encompassed symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and mortality in 90 days. We assessed the consistency of the two profiles and compared the differences in functional independence rates of EVT patients among the EVT-applicable groups determined by MRI and perfusion.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 130 patients were enrolled, of which 114 were classified into the EVT-applicable group after triaging using MRI images. In this group, 96 patients underwent EVT, with 53 of them (55.2%) achieving functional independence. A total of 110 patients were divided into EVT-applicable group based on perfusion, among which 92 underwent EVT, with 49 of them (53.2%) achieving functional independence. The consistency of identifying EVT indication was moderate between two groups (κ = 0.42, 95% CI, 0.17-0.67). The functional independence rate was comparable between patients in the two EVT-applicable groups based on the two methods (55.2% vs. 53.2%, p = 0.789).
UNASSIGNED: MRI triaging based on FVH-DWI mismatch showed moderate inter-rater reliability compared with perfusion-based triage and comparable efficacy in predicting clinical outcomes after EVT.

BACKGROUND: The ideal blood pressure (BP) target in patients who undergo endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) with successful reperfusion is uncertain. Observational studies show that elevated BP during this period is associated with a higher risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and worse clinical outcomes. Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have explored whether intensive BP lowering improves clinical outcomes in these patients.
OBJECTIVE: This review aims to summarize the recent RCTs that compare intensive and conventional BP management strategies following EVT and discuss the innovative directions to improve.
RESULTS: The recently published RCTs failed to demonstrate the benefit of intensive BP control on the functional outcome and decreasing the risk of ICH. The complex mechanism in cerebral blood flow regulation and the inappropriate BP range chosen in RCTs may be the reasons behind the inconsistent results between observational studies and RCTs. Individualized BP management, reducing BP variability, and multi-stage BP management should be paid more attention in future exploration.
CONCLUSIONS: Intensive BP target did not improve clinical outcomes after successful EVT as compared with a conventional BP target. Further research is required to identify the optimal BP management strategy after reperfusion.

BACKGROUND: Symtomatic hemorrhagic transformation(sHT) was defined as any intracerebral hemorrhage that combined with clinical deterioration. While recent studies showed low rates of sHT in large core ischemic strokes treated with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), the specific impact of core size on overall hemorrhagic transformation (HT) remains unclear. We aim to investigate the relationship between ischemic core size and development of HT post thrombectomy.
METHODS: This prospective study enrolled acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with anterior large vessel occlusion undergoing EVT who had baseline MRI from 2017-2019. Pre-EVT Arterial Spin Labeling (ASL) and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI) scans were performed for volume calculations. Primary outcome was HT assessed within 72 hours post EVT. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze the associations between baseline DWI and ASL volumes and HT occurrence. Discriminative ability for HT was compared using receiver operating curve analysis (c-statistic).
RESULTS: We included 101 patients (median age: 64 [IQR 56-74] years, baseline NIHSS 13 [IQR 9-16]). Median DWI and ASL volume were 21.0 ml [IQR 8.3-47.2] and 105ml [59.5-172.9], respectively. 36.8% recieved intravenous thrombolysis before EVT. HT occurred in 36.6% of patients, including 16.8% with sHT. Baseline DWI volume was independently associated with HT (OR=1.030, 95% CI 1.008 to 1.053, P=0.009), while ASL volume wasn\'t statistically significant(P=0.330). The DWI model was superior to ASL model in predicting HT within 72 hours (c-statistic, 0.787).Neither DWI (P=0.149) nor ASL volume (P=0.834) effectively indicated sHT.
CONCLUSIONS: DWI-based ischemic core volume correlates significantly with HT within 72 hours post successful thrombectomy. This highlights the potential clinical utility of DWI in guiding treatment decisions for this population.

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment for patients with acute large vessel occlusion (LVO) secondary to intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) is unclear. Adjunctive rescue therapy with balloon angioplasty or stenting may be necessary to ensure vessel patency. We aimed to compare the safety and clinical outcomes of adjunctive rescue therapy vs lone thrombectomy for ICAD-related-LVO.
METHODS: A retrospective propensity score matching analysis was performed in acute stroke patients who had endovascular thrombectomy between 2008-2021. We included patients with acute ICAD-related-LVO. The location of ICAD and exposure to thrombolysis were used to generate propensity score matching to estimate the likelihood of treatment by adjunctive rescue therapy. The primary clinical outcome (90-day modified rankin scale 0-2) and safety outcomes (symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage) were assessed between the two groups.
RESULTS: One-hundred and forty-four patients were included. The median (IQR) age was 68(59-76) and 52(36%) were females. The baseline NIHSS was 12.5(8-19). Sixty-seven (47%) patients had ICAD in M1 or M2 segments. Forty-six patients (67%) had lone thrombectomy and twenty-one (28%) had adjunctive rescue therapy. Propensity score matching did not demonstrate significant differences in 90-day modified Rankin Score 0-2 between lone thrombectomy (38.8%) and adjunctive rescue therapy (39.3%) (p=0.3). Lone thrombectomy, compared to adjunctive rescue therapy, did not result in significantly more symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhages (2.8% vs 8.3%, p=0.6), nor progressive occlusion (17% vs 19%, p=0.8).
CONCLUSIONS: We did not find significant differences in clinical outcomes and safety between lone thrombectomy and adjunctive rescue therapy. Randomized controlled studies are required to resolve the equipoise in treatment of ICAD-related-LVO.

BACKGROUND: Intracranial artery calcification (ICAC) is a common finding on computed tomography (CT) in patients presenting with large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke (LVO-AIS) and could serve as a useful biomarker of intracranial atherosclerosis and altered intracranial vessel pliability in patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy (EVT).
METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study analyzing consecutive patients undergoing CT head prior to EVT between 2016 and 2020. Extent of ICAC proximal to the target vessel was scored using a validated grading scale examining thickness and circumferential extent of calcifications. The relationship between 3 levels of ICAC burden and procedural, clinical, and safety outcomes was analyzed.
RESULTS: Among 86 patients meeting inclusion criteria, ICAC of any degree was present in 72.1%. Median ICAC score was 3 [IQR 0-4]. There was a U-shaped association between ICAC score and successful reperfusion: 90.9%, 65.7%, and 94.4% in the low, intermediate, and high ICAC score groups, respectively (p = 0.008). Use of rescue intervention, most often angioplasty and stenting, was greatest in the high ICAC score group: 3.0% vs. 5.7% vs. 22.2% (p = 0.05). Functional independence at 90 days did not differ significantly among groups (41.7% vs. 31.0% vs. 15.4%, p = 0.26), nor did rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (15.2% vs. 14.3% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.97).
CONCLUSIONS: ICAC is seen on CT in nearly three-quarters of patients with LVO-AIS. Extent of ICAC has a U-shaped association with successful reperfusion, in part due to more frequent use of rescue interventions in patients with extensive ICAC.

OBJECTIVE: As indications for acute ischemic stroke treatment expand, it is unclear whether disparities in treatment utilization and outcome still exist. The main objective of this study was to investigate disparities in acute ischemic stroke treatment and determine impact on outcome.
METHODS: Retrospective observational cohort study of consecutive ischemic stroke admissions to a comprehensive stroke center from 2012-2021 was performed. Primary exposure was intravenous thrombolysis and/or endovascular thrombectomy. Primary end points were discharge modified Rankin Scale, home disposition, and expired/hospice. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to elucidate disparities in treatment utilization and determine impact on outcome.
RESULTS: Of 517,615 inpatient visits, there were 7,540 (1.46 %) ischemic stroke admissions, increasing from 1.14 % to 1.79 % from 2012-2021. Intravenous thrombolysis significantly decreased from 14.4 % to 9.8 % while endovascular thrombectomy significantly increased from 0.8 % to 10.5 %. Both intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular thrombectomy increased odds of discharge home and modified Rankin Scale 0-2, and thrombectomy decreased odds of expired/hospice. After adjusting for covariates, decreased odds of thrombectomy was associated with Medicaid insurance (Odds Ratio [95 % Confidence Interval] 0.55 [0.32-0.93]), age 80+ (0.49 [0.35-0.69]), prior stroke (0.49 [0.31-0.77]), and diabetes mellitus (0.55 [0.39-0.79]), while low median household income (<$80,000/year) increased odds of no acute treatment (1.34 [1.16-1.56]). No sex or racial disparities were observed. Medicaid and low-income were not associated with worse clinical outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Less endovascular thrombectomy occurred in Medicaid, older, prior stroke, and diabetic patients, while low-income was associated with no treatment. The observed socioeconomic disparities did not impact discharge outcome.

A decade on from the first positive thrombectomy trials, hyperacute therapies for ischemic stroke continue to rapidly advance. Effective treatments remain limited to reperfusion, although several cytoprotective approaches continue to be investigated. Intravenous fibrinolytics are now demonstrated to be beneficial up to 24 h in patients selected using perfusion imaging, but their role in patients with non-disabling symptoms appears very limited. Tenecteplase is superior to alteplase in meta-analysis of the latest trials, and adjuvant thrombolytics are an area of active investigation. Endovascular thrombectomy is beneficial in a wide range of anterior and posterior circulation large vessel occlusions up to 24 h after onset with the more distal occlusions, mild presentations, and >24 h window being the main frontiers to be tested in ongoing trials. Imaging parameters are prognostic but appear not to modify the relative treatment benefit of thrombectomy versus standard medical care. Therefore, deciding who not to treat with thrombectomy is a key clinical challenge that requires careful but rapid integration of clinical, imaging, and patient preference considerations. Systems of care to accelerate delivery of these highly effective therapies will maximize benefits for the greatest number of patients with stroke.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of preoperative versus intraoperative tirofiban in patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) due to large artery atherosclerosis (LAA).
METHODS: This is a retrospective multicenter cohort study based on the RESCUE-RE (Registration Study for Critical Care of Acute Ischemic Stroke After Recanalization) trial enrolling patients with anterior circulation LVO classified as LAA within 24 h of onset. Patients were divided into three groups: preoperative tirofiban (PT), intraoperative tirofiban (IT), and no tirofiban (NT). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline characteristics. The efficacy outcomes included 90-day functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score = 0-2) and early partial recanalization (EPR; defined as a modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score = 1-2a). The safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH).
RESULTS: A total of 104 matched triplets were obtained through PSM. Compared with NT, PT increased 90-day functional independence (60.8% vs. 42.3%, p = 0.008) and EPR (42.7% vs. 18.3%, p < 0.001) rate, with a tendency to increase the asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (aICH) proportion (28.8% vs. 18.3%, p = 0.072). Compared with IT, PT had a higher 90-day functional independence (60.8% vs. 45.2%, p = 0.025) and EPR (42.7% vs. 20.2%, p = 0.001) rate, with no significant difference in sICH (14.4% vs. 7.7%, p = 0.122) and aICH (28.8% vs. 21.2%, p = 0.200). Compared with NT, IT had a lower 90-day mortality rate (9.6% vs. 24.0%, p = 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: Tirofiban shows good adjuvant therapy potential in acute ischemic stroke-LVO due to LAA patients. PT is associated with higher rates of EPR and better therapeutic efficacy. In addition, EPR may be a potential way to improve prognosis.