chemoimmunotherapy

化学免疫疗法
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:免疫治疗联合化疗是广泛期小细胞肺癌(ES-SCLC)患者的一线治疗。越来越多的证据表明辐射,特别是立体定向身体放射治疗(SBRT),可以增强免疫原性反应以及细胞减少肿瘤负担。该研究的主要目的是确定接受多位点SBRT和化学免疫疗法联合治疗的新诊断ES-SCLC患者的无进展生存期(卡铂,依托泊苷,和durvalumab)。
    方法:这是一个多中心,单臂,第二阶段研究。患者治疗-幼稚,ES-SCLC将有资格参加本研究。患者将接受durvalumab1500mgIVq3w,卡铂AUC5至6毫克/毫升q3w,和依托泊苷80至100毫克/平方米在第1天至3q3w四个周期,然后是durvalumab1500mg静脉q4w,直到疾病进展或不可接受的毒性。消融放射将分3或5个部分进行1至4个颅外部位。由位置决定,在周期2。主要终点是无进展生存期,从化学免疫疗法的第1天开始测量。次要终点包括RT后三个月内CTCAEv5.0的≥3级毒性,总生存率,响应率,二线系统治疗的时间,以及新的遥远进步的时间。
    结论:现在免疫疗法已成为ES-SCLC管理的一个既定部分,重要的是进一步优化其使用和效果。这项研究将调查ES-SCLC患者SBRT和化学免疫疗法联合治疗的无进展生存期。此外,这项研究的数据可能进一步说明SBRT与化学免疫疗法的免疫原性作用,以及识别临床,生物,或放射学预后特征。
    BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy is first-line treatment for patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Growing evidence suggests that radiation, specifically stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), may enhance the immunogenic response as well as cytoreduce tumor burden. The primary objective of the study is to determine the progression free survival for patients with newly diagnosed ES-SCLC treated with combination multisite SBRT and chemo-immunotherapy (carboplatin, etoposide, and durvalumab).
    METHODS: This is a multicenter, single arm, phase 2 study. Patients with treatment-naïve, ES-SCLC will be eligible for this study. Patients will receive durvalumab 1500mg IV q3w, carboplatin AUC 5 to 6 mg/mL q3w, and etoposide 80 to 100 mg/m2 on days 1 to 3 q3w for four cycles, followed by durvalumab 1500mg IV q4w until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Ablative radiation will be delivered 1 to 4 extracranial sites in 3 or 5 fractions, determined by location, during cycle 2. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival, measured from day 1 of chemoimmunotherapy. Secondary endpoints include grade ≥3 toxicity by CTCAE v5.0 within three months of RT, overall survival, response rate, time to second line systemic therapy, and time to new distant progression.
    CONCLUSIONS: Now that immunotherapy is an established part of ES-SCLC management, it is important to further optimize its use and effect. This study will investigate the progression-free survival of combined SBRT and chemo-immunotherapy in patients with ES-SCLC. In addition, the data from this study may further inform the immunogenic role of SBRT with chemo-immunotherapy, as well as identify clinical, biological, or radiomic prognostic features.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    化学免疫疗法是临床上治疗几种恶性疾病的新兴范例。如非小细胞肺癌,乳腺癌,和大B细胞淋巴瘤.然而,该策略的有效性仍然受到严重不良事件和高治疗终止率的限制,可能是由于缺乏化疗和免疫治疗剂的肿瘤靶向分布。靶向药物递送具有解决该问题的潜力。在临床转化中最有前途的纳米载体中,近年来,脂质体在肿瘤化疗免疫治疗中引起了广泛关注。脂质体支持的癌症化学免疫疗法在临床上取得了重大进展,令人印象深刻的治疗结果。本文综述了脂质体介导的癌症化学免疫治疗的最新临床前和临床进展,并讨论了该领域面临的挑战和未来的发展方向。
    Chemoimmunotherapy is an emerging paradigm in the clinic for treating several malignant diseases, such as non-small cell lung cancer, breast cancer, and large B-cell lymphoma. However, the efficacy of this strategy is still restricted by serious adverse events and a high therapeutic termination rate, presumably due to the lack of tumor-targeted distribution of both chemotherapeutic and immunotherapeutic agents. Targeted drug delivery has the potential to address this issue. Among the most promising nanocarriers in clinical translation, liposomes have drawn great attention in cancer chemoimmunotherapy in recent years. Liposomes-enabled cancer chemoimmunotherapy has made significant progress in clinics, with impressive therapeutic outcomes. This review summarizes the latest preclinical and clinical progress in liposome-enabled cancer chemoimmunotherapy and discusses the challenges and future directions of this field.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    耐药性是癌症化疗中的重大挑战,并且是导致癌症患者恢复不良的主要因素。尽管载药纳米颗粒在克服化疗耐药性方面显示出了希望,他们经常携带药物组合,需要先进的设计和制造工艺。此外,从免疫疗法的角度来看,他们很少接近化疗耐药的肿瘤。在这项研究中,我们开发了一种仅由化疗诱导的耐药肿瘤抗原(CIRTAs)和免疫佐剂Toll样受体(TLR)7/8激动剂R848(CIRTAs@R848)组成的治疗性纳米疫苗.这种纳米疫苗不需要额外的载体并且具有简单的生产过程。它有效地同时向树突状细胞(DCs)递送抗原和免疫刺激剂,促进DC成熟。CIRTAs@R848表现出显著的肿瘤抑制,特别是与免疫检查点阻断(ICB)抗PD-1(αPD-1)联合使用时。联合治疗增加了T细胞向肿瘤的浸润,同时降低了调节性T细胞(Tregs)的比例并调节了肿瘤微环境,导致长期免疫记忆。总的来说,这项研究从一个新的角度介绍了一种治疗化疗耐药肿瘤的创新策略,具有在个性化免疫疗法和精准医学中的潜在应用。
    Drug resistance is a significant challenge in cancer chemotherapy and is a primary factor contributing to poor recovery for cancer patients. Although drug-loaded nanoparticles have shown promise in overcoming chemotherapy resistance, they often carry a combination of drugs and require advanced design and manufacturing processes. Furthermore, they seldom approach chemotherapy-resistant tumors from an immunotherapy perspective. In this study, we developed a therapeutic nanovaccine composed solely of chemotherapy-induced resistant tumor antigens (CIRTAs) and the immune adjuvant Toll-like receptor (TLR) 7/8 agonist R848 (CIRTAs@R848). This nanovaccine does not require additional carriers and has a simple production process. It efficiently delivers antigens and immune stimulants to dendritic cells (DCs) simultaneously, promoting DCs maturation. CIRTAs@R848 demonstrated significant tumor suppression, particularly when used in combination with the immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) anti-PD-1 (αPD-1). The combined therapy increased the infiltration of T cells into the tumor while decreasing the proportion of regulatory T cells (Tregs) and modulating the tumor microenvironment, resulting in long-term immune memory. Overall, this study introduces an innovative strategy for treating chemotherapy-resistant tumors from a novel perspective, with potential applications in personalized immunotherapy and precision medicine.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    采用靶向内质网(ER)的化学免疫疗法的前景为放大化学疗法和免疫疗法的协同作用提供了机会。在这项研究中,我们最初通过促进结直肠癌(CRC)细胞内质网应激和自噬,验证了雷公藤红素(CEL)作为免疫原性细胞死亡(ICD)的诱导剂.随后,提出了以ER为目标的策略,涉及使用KDEL肽修饰的来自牛奶的外泌体(KME)将CEL与PD-L1小干扰RNA(siRNA)共同递送,以增强化学免疫疗法的结果。我们的发现证明了KME通过高尔基体到ER途径的有效运输。与他们的非目标对手相比,KME表现出CEL诱导的ICD效应的显著增强。此外,它促进了危险信号分子(DAMPs)的释放,从而刺激树突状细胞的抗原呈递功能并促进T细胞向肿瘤的浸润。同时,ER靶向递送PD-L1siRNA导致细胞内和膜PD-L1蛋白表达下调,从而促进CD8+T细胞的增殖和活性。最终,ER靶向制剂表现出增强的抗肿瘤功效,并在体内引发针对原位结直肠肿瘤的抗肿瘤免疫应答.总的来说,稳健的ER靶向递送策略为实现有效的癌症化学免疫疗法提供了令人鼓舞的方法.
    The prospect of employing chemoimmunotherapy targeted towards the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) presents an opportunity to amplify the synergistic effects of chemotherapy and immunotherapy. In this study, we initially validated celastrol (CEL) as an inducer of immunogenic cell death (ICD) by promoting ER stress and autophagy in colorectal cancer (CRC) cells. Subsequently, an ER-targeted strategy was posited, involving the codelivery of CEL with PD-L1 small interfering RNAs (siRNA) using KDEL peptide-modified exosomes derived from milk (KME), to enhance chemoimmunotherapy outcomes. Our findings demonstrate the efficient transportation of KME to the ER via the Golgi-to-ER pathway. Compared to their non-targeting counterparts, KME exhibited a significant augmentation of the CEL-induced ICD effect. Additionally, it facilitated the release of danger signaling molecules (DAMPs), thereby stimulating the antigen-presenting function of dendritic cells and promoting the infiltration of T cells into the tumor. Concurrently, the ER-targeted delivery of PD-L1 siRNA resulted in the downregulation of both intracellular and membrane PD-L1 protein expression, consequently fostering the proliferation and activity of CD8+ T cells. Ultimately, the ER-targeted formulation exhibited enhanced anti-tumor efficacy and provoked anti-tumor immune responses against orthotopic colorectal tumors in vivo. Collectively, a robust ER-targeted delivery strategy provides an encouraging approach for achieving potent cancer chemoimmunotherapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:患有三重难治性(TCR)多发性骨髓瘤(MM)的患者通常需要细胞减灭性化疗以快速控制疾病。苯达莫司汀是一种门诊病人,双功能烷化剂和伊沙妥昔单抗是一种具有独特细胞毒性的抗CD38单克隆抗体。我们假设伊沙妥昔单抗-苯达莫司汀-泼尼松在TCRMM中是耐受性良好的方案,并进行了单中心,阶段Ib,研究者发起的研究。
    方法:患者有TCRMM,最后一次达雷木单抗暴露≥6周。本研究以3+3设计进行,以建立最大耐受剂量(MTD)和/或推荐2期剂量(RP2D)。伊沙妥昔单抗10mg/kg静脉给药每周(第1周期),此后每两周。在第1天和第2天以3个剂量水平(DL):50、75和100mg/m2施用苯达莫司汀。在第1天给予125mg甲基强的松龙,第2-4天给予60mg泼尼松。常用的定义用于DLT,不良事件(CTCAEv5.0),和疾病反应。
    结果:15例患者接受治疗(3DL1、6DL2、6DL3)。中位年龄为71岁,53%有高风险的细胞遗传学,34%曾接受过BCMA靶向治疗。在DL2观察到一个DLT(3级血小板减少症+出血)。没有5级治疗相关的AE。未达到MTD。总应答率为20%(3/15),包括一个严格的完全应答。中位PFS为2.5个月(95%CI0.9-4.1个月)。
    结论:我们证明了伊沙妥昔单抗-苯达莫司汀-泼尼松的安全性和耐受性。毒性是轻微的,在有限的干预下是可控的。该研究因累积缓慢而终止。然而,我们观察到即使在高度难治性患者中的反应。
    背景:该研究于2019年9月6日在clinicaltrials.gov上注册为NCT04083898。
    BACKGROUND: Patients with triple-class refractory (TCR) multiple myeloma (MM) often need cytoreductive chemotherapy for rapid disease control. Bendamustine is an outpatient-administered, bifunctional alkylator and isatuximab is an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody with unique cytotoxicity characteristics. We hypothesized that isatuximab-bendamustine-prednisone would be well-tolerated regimen in TCR MM, and conducted single-center, phase Ib, investigator-initiated study.
    METHODS: Patients had TCR MM and last daratumumab exposure ≥ 6 weeks. This study was conducted as a 3 + 3 design to establish the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Isatuximab 10 mg/kg IV was administered weekly (cycle 1), and every 2 weeks thereafter. Bendamustine was administered on days 1 and 2 at 3 dose levels (DL): 50, 75, and 100 mg/m2. Methylprednisolone was administered as 125 mg on day 1 and prednisone 60 mg days 2-4. Common definitions were used for DLTs, adverse events (CTCAE v 5.0), and disease response.
    RESULTS: Fifteen patients were treated (3 DL1, 6 DL2, 6 DL3). Median age was 71, 53% had high-risk cytogenetics, and 34% had prior BCMA-targeting therapy. One DLT was observed at DL2 (Grade 3 thrombocytopenia plus bleeding). There were no Grade 5 treatment-related AEs. The MTD was not reached. The overall response rate was 20% (3/15) including one stringent complete response. The median PFS was 2.5 months (95% CI 0.9-4.1 months).
    CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated the safety and tolerability of isatuximab-bendamustine-prednisone. Toxicities were mild and manageable with limited intervention. The study was discontinued due to slow accrual. However, we observed responses even among highly refractory patients.
    BACKGROUND: This study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04083898 on 9/6/2019.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Richter转化(RT)定义为慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)或小淋巴细胞淋巴瘤(SLL)演变为侵袭性淋巴瘤,最常见的是弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤。这种并发症是罕见和侵略性的,预后不良,生存惨淡。与基础CLL/SLL的克隆关系,在80%的病例中观察到,是影响预后的主要因素之一。治疗历来以化学免疫疗法为基础,但是在涉及细胞存活和增殖的基因中经常发生突变,如TP53,NOTCH1,MYC,CDKN2A赋予标准治疗抗性。在过去的几年里,对RT的生物学机制的认识取得了进展,从而可以鉴定出可能被新型选择剂靶向的遗传和分子病变.通路和检查点抑制剂,双特异性抗体和CAR-T细胞疗法目前正在研究中,代表了有希望的治疗选择。这篇综述总结了有关新型治疗剂的当前生物学证据和可用数据。
    Richter\'s transformation (RT) is defined as the evolution of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) into an aggressive lymphoma, most commonly diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. This complication is rare and aggressive, with poor prognosis and dismal survival. Clonal relationship with the underlying CLL/SLL, observed in ∼80% of cases, represents one of the main factors affecting prognosis. Treatment has been historically based on chemoimmunotherapy, but frequent mutations in genes involved in cell survival and proliferation-such as TP53, NOTCH1, MYC, CDKN2A-confer resistance to standard treatments. During the last years, advances in the knowledge of the biological mechanisms underlying RT allowed to identify genetic and molecular lesions that can potentially be targeted by novel selective agents. Pathway and checkpoint inhibitors, bispecific antibodies and CAR T-cell therapy are currently under investigation and represent promising treatment options. This review summarizes current biological evidence and available data on novel therapeutic agents.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    PD-L1阴性的病人,TMB低,KEAP1/STK11共同突变的转移性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)在开始化学免疫疗法作为转移性疾病的一线治疗后3个月经历了多部位放射学进展。放射学进展后,在她没有接受治疗的时候,患者出现自发性病灶缩小,并进一步获得了延长的完全缓解.在基线和假性进展时收集的基因组和转录组数据使我们能够生物学表征这种罕见的反应模式。我们观察到针对肿瘤特异性新抗原(TNA)的肿瘤特异性T细胞应答的存在。还观察到化学免疫疗法后内源性逆转录病毒(ERV)的表达,与I型IFN信号传导和CXCR3相关趋化因子产生的抗病毒样先天免疫应答的生物学特征同时发生。这是在化学免疫疗法下NSCLC假性进展的第一个生物学特征,随后是PD-L1阴性的长期完全反应,TMB低,KEAP1/STK11共突变非小细胞肺癌。这些临床和生物学数据强调,即使对免疫检查点抑制剂具有多种耐药性的患者也可能引发对肿瘤新抗原的肿瘤特异性免疫反应。导致肿瘤完全根除,可能是疫苗免疫反应。
    A patient with a PD-L1-negative, TMB-low, KEAP1/STK11 co-mutated metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) experienced a multisite radiological progression at 3 months after initiation of chemoimmunotherapy as first-line treatment for metastatic disease. After the radiological progression, while she was not undergoing treatment, the patient had spontaneous lesions shrinkage and further achieved a prolonged complete response. Genomic and transcriptomic data collected at baseline and at the time of pseudoprogression allowed us to biologically characterize this rare response pattern. We observed the presence of a tumor-specific T-cell response against tumor-specific neoantigens (TNAs). Endogenous retroviruses (ERVs) expression following chemoimmunotherapy was also observed, concurrent with biological features of an anti-viral-like innate immune response with type I IFN signaling and production of CXCR3-associated chemokines. This is the first biological characterization of a NSCLC pseudoprogression under chemoimmunotherapy followed by a prolonged complete response in a PD-L1-negative, TMB-low, KEAP1/STK11 co-mutated NSCLC. These clinical and biological data underline that even patients with multiple factors of resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors could trigger a tumor-specific immune response to tumor neoantigen, leading to complete eradication of the tumor and probably a vaccinal immune response.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    已在各种类型的癌症中记录了反应深度(DpR)与治疗结果之间的关联。基于免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)的治疗在全球范围内用作程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)表达≥50%的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的一线治疗。然而,在这个人口中,DpR的意义尚未阐明。回顾性研究纳入接受ICI单药或ICI加化疗的晚期NSCLC和PD-L1表达≥50%的患者。治疗反应按最大肿瘤减少百分比(Q1=1-25%,Q2=26-50%,Q3=51-75%,和Q4=≥76%),没有肿瘤缩小(NTR)。使用Cox比例风险模型产生的风险比(HR)确定DpR与生存率之间的关联。Kaplan-Meier方法用于确定生存结果。共纳入349例患者,其中214和135例患者接受了派博利珠单抗单药治疗和ICI加化疗,分别,作为一线治疗。大多数患者是男性。所有DpR四分位数,尤其是Q4,显示与无进展生存期(PFS)/总生存期(OS)相关。在Q4队列中,与接受ICI+化疗的患者相比,接受派姆单抗治疗的患者的PFS更长.高DpR与较长的PFS和OS相关,与ICI加化疗相比,pembrolizumab单药治疗的效果更明显。
    The association between depth of response (DpR) and treatment outcomes has been documented across various types of cancer. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based treatment is globally used as first-line treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥ 50%. However, in this population, the significance of DpR is not elucidated. Patients with advanced NSCLC and PD-L1 expression ≥ 50% who received ICI-monotherapy or ICI plus chemotherapy were retrospectively enrolled into this study. Treatment responses were grouped into DpR \'quartiles\' by percentage of maximal tumor reduction (Q1 = 1-25%, Q2 = 26-50%, Q3 = 51-75%, and Q4 =  ≥ 76%), and no tumor reduction (NTR). The association between DpR and survival rates were determined using hazard ratios (HR) generated by the Cox proportional hazards model. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine survival outcomes. A total of 349 patients were included, of which 214 and 135 patients received pembrolizumab monotherapy and ICI plus chemotherapy, respectively, as first-line treatments. The majority of the patients were male. All DpR quartiles, especially Q4, showed an association with progression-free survival (PFS)/overall survival (OS). In the Q4 cohort, patients who received pembrolizumab had a longer PFS than those who received ICI plus chemotherapy. High DpR was associated with longer PFS and OS, with a more pronounced effect observed with pembrolizumab monotherapy than with ICI plus chemotherapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)耐药的化疗中添加免疫检查点抑制剂的作用,表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变型非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)仍未知.我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以全面评估化学免疫疗法组合的作用,有或没有血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)抑制,在抗TKI中,EGFR突变非小细胞肺癌。
    方法:我们系统地搜索了PubMed/MEDLINE和2018年至2024年之间的重要年度会议的会议记录,以确定评估化学免疫疗法组合并包括EGFR突变NSCLC患者的随机研究。六个随机,III期试验(CheckMate-722,KEYNOTE-789,ORIENT-31,IMpower150,IMpower151和ATTLAS)纳入荟萃分析.比较无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)结局,我们从每项研究中提取了EGFR突变亚组的PFS和OS的风险比(HR)和95%置信区间(CI).我们使用具有逆方差加权的固定效应模型来估计化学免疫疗法组合(有和没有VEGF抑制剂)与对照组的PFS和OS的总体效应大小。
    结果:共纳入1772例EGFR突变型NSCLC患者。在化疗中加入程序性死亡配体1[PD-(L)1]抑制剂可显著改善PFS(HR0.77,95%CI0.67-0.88,P=0.0002)。当同时利用PD-(L)1和VEGF抑制时,这种效果更大(PFS:HR0.62,95%CI0.52-0.73,P<0.0001)。化疗+PD-(L)1组合的合并OSHR为0.86(95%CI0.75-1.00,P=0.0429),PD-(L)1/VEGF双重抑制的合并OSHR为0.98(95%CI0.79-1.22,P=0.8463)。
    结论:尽管PFS有所改善,当将PD-(L)1和VEGF抑制剂添加到化疗中时,最明显,两种策略均未导致OS的临床上有意义的改善.我们的结果不支持在TKI耐药中广泛使用化学免疫疗法组合,EGFR突变肺癌。癌基因驱动的NSCLC迫切需要新的免疫治疗方法。
    BACKGROUND: The role of adding immune checkpoint inhibitors to chemotherapy in tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-resistant, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unknown. We carried out a meta-analysis to comprehensively assess the role of chemoimmunotherapy combinations, with and without vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibition, in TKI-resistant, EGFR-mutant NSCLC.
    METHODS: We systemically searched PubMed/MEDLINE and the proceedings of key annual meetings between 2018 and 2024 to identify randomized studies that evaluated chemoimmunotherapy combinations and included patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Six randomized, phase III trials (CheckMate-722, KEYNOTE-789, ORIENT-31, IMpower150, IMpower151, and ATTLAS) were included in the meta-analysis. To compare progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes, we extracted hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for PFS and OS for EGFR-mutant subgroups from each study. We used the fixed effects model with inverse variance weighting to estimate the overall effect sizes for PFS and OS for chemoimmunotherapy combinations (with and without VEGF inhibitors) versus control arms.
    RESULTS: A total of 1772 patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC were included. Adding programmed death-ligand 1 [PD-(L)1] inhibitors to chemotherapy significantly improved PFS (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.67-0.88, P = 0.0002). This effect was greater when both PD-(L)1 and VEGF inhibition were utilized (PFS: HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.52-0.73, P < 0.0001). The pooled OS HR was 0.86 (95% CI 0.75-1.00, P = 0.0429) with the chemotherapy + PD-(L)1 combinations and 0.98 (95% CI 0.79-1.22, P = 0.8463) with dual PD-(L)1/VEGF inhibition.
    CONCLUSIONS: Despite modest improvements in PFS, most pronounced when both PD-(L)1 and VEGF inhibitors are added to chemotherapy, neither strategy led to clinically meaningful improvements in OS. Our results do not support the broad use of chemoimmunotherapy combinations in TKI-resistant, EGFR-mutant lung cancer. Novel immunotherapy approaches are urgently needed for oncogene-driven NSCLC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:化学免疫疗法(CIT)对慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)患者免疫球蛋白(Ig)量的影响尚未得到广泛研究。
    方法:我们分析了45例稳定的无痛性CLL患者(无治疗指征)和87例进行性疾病患者一线治疗前的Ig水平。55名患者在接受CIT治疗后再次接受评估。
    结果:我们观察到,与无痛性疾病患者相比,进行性疾病患者的所有Ig类别和亚类的水平均显着降低。治疗后,中位数IgA从0.59g/L增加到0.74g/L(p=0.0031).在稳定的患者中,较低的IgA2与较短的首次治疗时间相关,尽管没有达到统计学意义(p=0.056)。在患有进行性疾病和较低IgG2的患者中观察到较短的总生存期(p=0.043)。令人惊讶的是,在进行性CLL患者中,未突变的IGHV基因与较高的IgG水平相关,IgG1和IgM,而TP53突变和/或17p缺失与较高的IgA和IgA1水平相关。
    结论:CIT可能导致IgA水平升高。低丙种球蛋白血症在患有进行性CLL和未突变的IGHV或TP53功能障碍的患者中更常见。
    BACKGROUND: The impact of chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) on immunoglobulin (Ig) quantities in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has not been extensively studied.
    METHODS: We analyzed Ig levels in 45 stable patients with indolent CLL (without indication for treatment) and 87 patients with progressive disease before first-line treatment. Fifty-five patients were evaluated again after the treatment with CIT.
    RESULTS: We observed significantly lower levels of all Ig classes and subclasses in patients with progressive disease compared to patients with indolent disease. After treatment, median IgA increased from 0.59 g/L to 0.74 g/L (p = 0.0031). In stable patients, lower IgA2 was associated with shorter time to first treatment, although it did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.056). Shorter overall survival was observed in patients with progressive disease and lower IgG2 (p = 0.043). Surprisingly, among the patients with progressive CLL, unmutated IGHV genes were associated with higher levels of IgG, IgG1 and IgM, while TP53 mutation and/or 17p deletion were associated with higher levels of IgA and IgA1.
    CONCLUSIONS: CIT may lead to increase in IgA levels. Hypogammaglobulinemia is more common in patients with progressive CLL and unmutated IGHV or TP53 dysfunction.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号