chemoimmunotherapy

化学免疫疗法
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    在用全身免疫疗法治疗的患者中恶性肿瘤的假性进展是公认的现象,并且在用联合化学免疫疗法治疗的患者中也观察到。手术前的新辅助化学免疫疗法是许多恶性肿瘤的相对较新的治疗策略。我们报告了一例新辅助化学免疫疗法后怀疑患有原发性肺鳞状细胞癌进展的患者。活检的组织病理学显示肉芽肿样结节病样炎症,而不是进展或转移性疾病。患者继续成功地手术清除了残留的肿瘤。重要的是,未能怀疑肉芽肿反应和假性进展对患者护理的轨迹有深远的影响,例如,患者错过治愈性手术的可能性。在这个案例报告和文献综述中,我们评估了假性进展的作用,以及放射科医师意识到这一现象的必要性,这样他们就不会错误地报告新的转移和破坏可治愈恶性疾病患者的治疗模式.
    Pseudoprogression of malignancy in patients treated with systemic immunotherapy is a well- recognised phenomenon and has also been seen in patients treated with combined chemoimmunotherapy. Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy prior to surgery is a relatively new treatment strategy for the management of many malignancies. We report the case of a patient who was suspected to have primary lung squamous cell carcinoma progression following neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy. Tissue histopathology from biopsies demonstrated granulomatous sarcoid-like inflammation rather than progression or metastatic disease. The patient proceeded to have successful surgical clearance of residual tumour. Significantly, failure to suspect granulomatous reactions and pseudoprogression has profound influence on the trajectory of patient care, such as, the potential for patients to miss out on curative surgery. In this case report and review of the literature, we evaluate the role of pseudoprogression and the need for radiologists to be aware of this phenomenon so that they do not mistakenly report new metastases and derail the treatment paradigm for patients with curable malignant conditions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)代表了一种高度侵袭性的乳腺癌亚型,历史上使用主要涉及蒽环类和紫杉烷类的化疗方案进行管理,产生不利的预后。这篇综述致力于全面检查早期三阴性乳腺癌(eTNBC)的治疗策略的现状。特别强调免疫治疗方式,联合疗法,预测性生物标志物,和正在进行的临床试验。这篇综述的主要目的是仔细评估现有文献,确定重大发现,并参与讨论它们对未来研究工作的潜在影响,临床应用,和政策制定。
    这项审查是使用PubMed和GoogleScholar数据库进行的,最新更新于2023年3月进行。搜索策略旨在确保对文献进行全面分析,专注于最近的进步。
    我们严格评估当前的eTNBC治疗前景,涵盖单一疗法的疗效和局限性,联合疗法,和预测性生物标志物。我们强调了最近试验的有希望的结果,解决围绕化疗的争议,并探索辅助和新辅助治疗(NAT)的最佳方法。对个性化治疗策略的见解,正在进行的试验,并提供了未来的前景,推进我们对eTNBC治疗方案的理解。
    通过对文献的综合分析,这篇综述强调了免疫治疗的潜力,特别是联合化疗,作为治疗eTNBC的一种有希望的方法。然而,需要进一步的研究来优化治疗策略,完善患者选择标准,并确定可靠的生物标志物,以预测对免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)的反应。这篇综述的发现对未来的研究具有重要意义,临床实践,和政策制定,提供对eTNBC治疗当前挑战和进步的宝贵见解。最终,这些知识有助于改善患者的预后,提高生活质量,以及开发更有效的eTNBC治疗方法。
    UNASSIGNED: Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) represents a highly aggressive breast cancer subtype, historically managed with chemotherapy regimens predominantly involving anthracyclines and taxanes, yielding unfavorable prognoses. This review endeavors to offer a thorough examination of the present state of treatment strategies for early stage triple negative breast cancer (eTNBC), with a particular emphasis on immunotherapy modalities, combination therapies, predictive biomarkers, and ongoing clinical trials. The principal aim of this review is to meticulously assess the available literature, ascertain significant discoveries, and engage in discussions regarding their potential implications for future research endeavors, clinical applications, and policy formulation.
    UNASSIGNED: This review was conducted using PubMed and Google Scholar databases, with the latest update performed in March 2023. The search strategy was designed to ensure a comprehensive analysis of the literature, with a focus on recent advancements.
    UNASSIGNED: We critically assess the current eTNBC treatment landscape, covering efficacy and limitations of monotherapy, combination therapies, and predictive biomarkers. We highlight promising results from recent trials, address controversies surrounding chemotherapy, and explore optimal approaches for adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). Insights into personalized treatment strategies, ongoing trials, and future perspectives are provided, advancing our understanding of therapeutic options for eTNBC.
    UNASSIGNED: Through a comprehensive analysis of the literature, this review highlights the potential of immunotherapy, particularly in combination with chemotherapy, as a promising approach for treating eTNBC. However, further research is warranted to optimize treatment strategies, refine patient selection criteria, and identify reliable biomarkers for predicting response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The findings of this review hold significant implications for future research, clinical practice, and policy-making, offering valuable insights into the current challenges and advancements in eTNBC treatment. Ultimately, this knowledge can contribute to improved patient outcomes, enhanced quality of life, and the development of more effective therapeutic approaches for eTNBC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    背景:化疗与免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)的联合使用已显示出对三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)的疗效,和化学免疫疗法已被引入临床实践。然而,关于这些治疗的停药率和严重不良事件的数据有限,特别是在新辅助治疗中。在这里,在TNBC的II期和III期新辅助临床试验中,我们进行了全面的系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估与单纯化疗相比,化疗免疫疗法的停药率和严重不良事件.
    方法:遵循系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目,EMBASE,科克伦图书馆,和PubMed/Medline搜索了2008年6月至2023年5月发表的文章。感兴趣的结果是停药率,严重不良事件,和3-4级不良事件。
    结果:四项研究纳入分析。停药率和严重不良事件的合并比值比(ORs)为1.26[95%置信区间(CI)0.78-2.06]和1.79(95%CI1.4-2.28),分别,在接受化学免疫治疗的患者中,与单纯化疗作为TNBC的新辅助治疗相比。化疗组发生3-4级不良事件的风险较高(OR1.30,95%CI1.07-1.59)。分析显示出巨大的异质性,停药率的风险受到KEYNOTE-522试验的严重影响.
    结论:我们的研究结果强调了需要进行专门针对安全性的临床试验,生活质量,接受新辅助治疗的TNBC患者的治疗依从性。在这种临床环境中,密切监测耐受性仍然至关重要。
    BACKGROUND: The use of combination of chemotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has shown efficacy in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), and chemoimmunotherapy has been introduced in clinical practice. However, limited data are available on the discontinuation rate and serious adverse events of these treatments, particularly in the neoadjuvant setting. Herein, we carried out a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to assess discontinuation rate and serious adverse events of chemoimmunotherapy compared to chemotherapy alone in phase II and III neoadjuvant clinical trials in TNBC.
    METHODS: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and PubMed/Medline were searched for articles published from June 2008 to May 2023. The outcomes of interest were the discontinuation rate, serious adverse events, and grade 3-4 adverse events.
    RESULTS: Four studies were included in the analysis. The pooled odds ratios (ORs) for discontinuation rate and serious adverse events were 1.26 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78-2.06] and 1.79 (95% CI 1.4-2.28), respectively, in patients receiving chemoimmunotherapy compared to chemotherapy alone as neoadjuvant treatment for TNBC. The chemoimmunotherapy group had a higher risk of grade 3-4 adverse events (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.07-1.59). The analysis showed substantial heterogeneity, and the risk of discontinuation rate was heavily influenced by the KEYNOTE-522 trial.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight the need for clinical trials specifically focused on safety, quality of life, and treatment adherence in TNBC patients receiving neoadjuvant treatment. Close monitoring of tolerability remains crucial in this clinical setting.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:近年来,新辅助免疫治疗联合化疗对局部晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)显示出越来越大的前景.然而,为了确定其临床疗效和安全性,积累更多真实临床数据势在必行.这项回顾性研究旨在评估梳理sintilimab的安全性和有效性,PD-1抑制剂,在诊断为可能可切除的NSCLC的患者中,将化疗作为新辅助治疗方式。
    方法:我们回顾性分析了2021年2月至2023年2月在四川省肿瘤医院接受新辅助化学免疫治疗的II-III期NSCLC患者。辛替利玛注射液(静脉注射,200毫克,iv,d1,q3w)和铂类化疗每3周静脉给药,计划在最后一次剂量后约4-11周进行根治性肺癌切除术。研究的主要终点是病理性完全缓解(pCR)。次要终点是客观反应率(ORR),和安全。
    结果:共纳入13例患者,他们大多被诊断为III期NSCLC(IIB15.4%,IIIA38.5%;IIIB46.2%).其中大多数经病理证实为鳞状细胞癌(69.2%)。所有患者均接受辛替利玛联合铂类化疗2~4个周期。值得注意的是,没有患者因无法耐受的不良事件而需要减少初始剂量或推迟治疗.然后,他们都接受了外科手术。令人印象深刻的是,9例患者(69.2%)达到病理完全缓解.客观反应率(ORR)为46.15%。9例患者出现新辅助治疗相关不良事件(TRAEs),只有一名患者(7.6%)遇到了4级新辅助TRAE。
    结论:因此,本研究提示,新辅助化疗联合铂类化疗是一种安全的方法,可提高潜在可切除的局部晚期NSCLC患者的治疗效率,并有望改善预后.
    BACKGROUND: In recent years, neoadjuvant immunotherapy with chemotherapy has shown increasing promise for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, to establish its clinical efficacy and safety, it is imperative to amass more real-world clinical data. This retrospective study aims to assess the safety and effectiveness of combing sintilimab, a PD-1 inhibitor, with chemotherapy as a neoadjuvant treatment modality in patients diagnosed with potentially resectable NSCLC.
    METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with stage II-III NSCLC receiving neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in Sichuan Cancer Hospital between February 2021 and February 2023. Sintilimab injection (intravenously,200 mg, iv, d1, q3w) and platinum-based chemotherapy were administered intravenously every 3 weeks, with radical lung cancer resection planned approximately 4-11 weeks after the last dose. The primary endpoint of the study was pathologic complete response (pCR). The secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), and safety.
    RESULTS: Thirteen patients were enrolled, they were mostly diagnosed with stage III NSCLC (IIB 15.4% IIIA 38.5%; IIIB 46.2%). Most of them had pathologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma (69.2%). All patients received sintilimab combined with platinum-based chemotherapy for 2 to 4 cycles. Notably, none of the patients necessitated a reduction in initial dosages or treatment postponement due to intolerable adverse events. Then, all of them underwent surgical operation. Impressively, nine patients (69.2%) achieved a pathologic complete response. The objective response rate (ORR) stood at 46.15%. Nine patients experienced neoadjuvant treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), with only one patient (7.6%) encountering a grade 4 neoadjuvant TRAE.
    CONCLUSIONS: Therefore, the current study suggested that neoadjuvant sintilimab plus platinum-based chemotherapy can be a safe approach in increasing the efficiency of treatment and hopefully improving the prognosis of patients with potentially resectable locally advanced NSCLC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    已知许多传统的癌症治疗如放疗和化疗诱导细胞DNA损伤作为其细胞毒活性的一部分。cGAS-STING信号轴,DNA损伤反应的关键成员,充当外来或异常胞质DNA的传感器,有助于合理化这些治疗的DNA损伤活性及其新兴的免疫刺激能力。此外,cGAS-STING,因其促进抗肿瘤免疫反应的能力而备受关注,可以从根本上解决许多限制癌症免疫治疗策略成功的障碍,包括免疫抑制肿瘤微环境。在这里,我们回顾了与cGAS-STING激活相关的传统癌症疗法,突出它们在DNA损伤反应中的作用和功能。作为审查的一部分,讨论了一种新兴的“化学免疫疗法”概念,即DNA损伤剂用于STING的间接激活,作为正在开发的直接分子激动策略的替代方案,但尚未获得临床批准。还讨论了这种方法在癌症免疫治疗中解决cGAS-STING信号传导的一些固有和新兴局限性的潜力。最终,越来越清楚的是,为了成功地利用cGAS-STING轴的免疫治疗潜力,需要在其相反的抗肿瘤和原瘤/炎症活性之间达到平衡。
    Many traditional cancer treatments such as radiation and chemotherapy are known to induce cellular DNA damage as part of their cytotoxic activity. The cGAS-STING signaling axis, a key member of the DNA damage response that acts as a sensor of foreign or aberrant cytosolic DNA, is helping to rationalize the DNA-damaging activity of these treatments and their emerging immunostimulatory capacity. Moreover, cGAS-STING, which is attracting considerable attention for its ability to promote antitumor immune responses, may fundamentally be able to address many of the barriers limiting the success of cancer immunotherapy strategies, including the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Herein, we review the traditional cancer therapies that have been linked with cGAS-STING activation, highlighting their targets with respect to their role and function in the DNA damage response. As part of the review, an emerging \"chemoimmunotherapy\" concept whereby DNA-damaging agents are used for the indirect activation of STING is discussed as an alternative to the direct molecular agonism strategies that are in development, but have yet to achieve clinical approval. The potential of this approach to address some of the inherent and emerging limitations of cGAS-STING signaling in cancer immunotherapy is also discussed. Ultimately, it is becoming clear that in order to successfully employ the immunotherapeutic potential of the cGAS-STING axis, a balance between its contrasting antitumor and protumor/inflammatory activities will need to be achieved.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    由抗CD20组成的联合化学免疫疗法(CIT)改善了慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)患者的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。与标准的单独化疗或靶向治疗相比,我们对CLL患者的联合CIT与抗CD20抗体的预后因素进行了综合综合。我们搜索了MEDLINE和学术搜索完整的电子数据库以及clinicaltrials.gov(从开始到2022年8月1日),用于研究CLL患者的化学免疫疗法和靶向治疗的随机对照试验。使用预后研究工具(QUIPS)中的质量评估偏倚风险和证据质量。在CLL患者中确定并评估了10种包含抗CD20抗体的CIT的预后因素。证实了以下预后因素的预测价值,并与不良患者预后相关;删除17p(HR=3.39),免疫球蛋白重链可变区基因突变状态(HR=0.96)和β2-微球蛋白(HR=1.41)。常规预测因素可能保留了预后价值,并且可能对可能对CIT无反应的患者进行分层有用。试验注册:国际前瞻性系统审查注册(PROSPERO)注册(CRD42021218997)。
    Combination chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) consisting of anti-CD20 has improved the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). We performed a comprehensive synthesis of prognostic factors in patients with CLL on combined CIT with anti-CD20 antibodies compared with standard chemotherapy alone or targeted therapy.We searched the MEDLINE and academic search complete electronic databases as well as clinicaltrials.gov (from inception up to 01 August 2022) for randomised controlled trials examining chemoimmunotherapy and targeted therapy in patients with CLL. The risk of bias and the quality of evidence was assessed using the quality in prognostic studies tool (QUIPS).A total of 10 prognostic factors were identified and evaluated in patients with CLL on anti-CD20 antibody-containing CIT. The predictive value of the following prognostic factors was confirmed and associated with poor patient outcomes; deletion 17p (HR = 3.39), Immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region gene mutation status (HR = 0.96) and β2-microglobulin (HR = 1.41).Conventional predictive factors may have retained prognostic value and could be useful in the stratification of patients who may be non-responsive to CIT.Trial registration: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) registry (CRD42021218997).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:原发性皮肤B细胞淋巴瘤(PCBCL)在诊断时仅出现在皮肤中,没有皮肤外疾病的证据,原发性皮肤滤泡中心淋巴瘤(PCFCL)是最常见的亚型。目前缺乏前瞻性随机对照试验和大型回顾性研究,研究不同治疗方案对PCFCL的疗效。进行这项回顾性研究是为了描述我们接受含利妥昔单抗方案治疗的患者的当地临床经验和结果。
    目的:描述我们当地使用含利妥昔单抗方案的患者的临床经验和治疗结果。
    方法:一项回顾性研究,包括25例PCFCL患者采用不同治疗方式。使用Kaplan-Meier估计和SAS9.4软件对患者记录进行审查和分析。
    结果:初次治疗后,除观察组1例患者外,所有患者均有CR。Further,60%的患者在手术中,20%的化学免疫疗法,67%的利妥昔单抗单药治疗,33%的类固醇注射/全身泼尼松,和33%的观察经历了复发。尽管由于样本量小,治疗组之间没有发现显着差异,复发时间趋势提供了对治疗反应的洞察.化学免疫疗法在治疗后的前5年复发率最低。而手术有较高的复发倾向。
    结论:尽管含有利妥昔单抗的化学免疫疗法可能产生不良反应,在PCFCL患者中可有效实现延长的临床缓解。它仍然是弥漫性的合理治疗选择,广泛的,或治疗抗性疾病。
    BACKGROUND: Primary cutaneous B-cell lymphoma (PCBCL) presents only in the skin at the time of diagnosis with no evidence of extracutaneous disease, and primary cutaneous follicle center lymphoma (PCFCL) is the most common subtype. There is currently a lack of prospective randomized control trials and large retrospective studies investigating the efficacy of different treatment options for PCFCL. This retrospective study was conducted to describe our local clinical experience and outcomes of patients treated with rituximab-containing regimens.
    OBJECTIVE: To describe our local clinical experience and treatment outcomes of patients treated with rituximab-containing regimens.
    METHODS: A retrospective study consisting of 25 PCFCL patients treated with different modalities. Patient records were reviewed and analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier estimation and SAS 9.4 software.
    RESULTS: After the initial treatment, all patients had CR except for 1 patient in the observation group. Further, 60% of patients in surgery, 20% in chemoimmunotherapy, 67% in rituximab monotherapy, 33% in steroid injection/systemic prednisone, and 33% in observation experienced a relapse. Although no significant difference was found between treatment groups due to the small sample size, time to relapse trends provides insight into treatment responses. Chemoimmunotherapy had the lowest relapse rate in the first 5 years post-treatment, whereas surgery had a higher tendency to relapse.
    CONCLUSIONS: Despite the potential for rituximab-containing chemoimmunotherapy to yield adverse effects, it is effective in achieving a prolonged clinical remission in patients with PCFCL. It remains a reasonable treatment option for diffuse, extensive, or treatment-resistant disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    目的:抗肿瘤免疫治疗的出现对肿瘤患者有益,但更应注意化学免疫疗法的毒副作用。在这里,我们描述了患有NK/T细胞淋巴瘤的患者,该患者在使用由sintilimab联合pegaspargase组成的方案治疗期间出现了中毒性表皮坏死松解症(TEN)。吉西他滨和奥沙利铂(P-GemOx)。病例介绍:1例患者接受6个周期的P-GemOx化疗作为一线治疗;1年后,由于NK/T细胞淋巴瘤复发,他接受了与化学免疫疗法相同剂量的P-GemOx联合sintilimab.他出现了大面积皮疹,在第四次化学免疫疗法后迅速发展为TEN。结论:虽然罕见,据报道,单药PD-1抑制剂或吉西他滨导致致命性TEN的病例.当这两种药物联合使用时,需要仔细注意药物相关的皮肤毒性。该报告强调了TEN作为化学免疫疗法引起的快速和严重不良事件的重要性。
    阻断PD-1与其配体相互作用的免疫检查点抑制剂,PD-L1已越来越多地用于癌症治疗。然而,这些药物引起的一些罕见的副作用,如毒性表皮坏死松解症(TEN),可能非常危险。在这里,我们描述了一名患有自然杀伤/T细胞淋巴瘤的患者,该患者在使用sintilimab和pegaspargase/吉西他滨/奥沙利铂(P-GemOx)的组合治疗期间发展为TEN。患者接受6个周期的P-GemOx化疗作为一线治疗,治疗期间或治疗后无皮肤反应。然而,一年后,患者接受相同剂量的P-GemOx联合sintilimab作为复发性自然杀伤/T细胞淋巴瘤的二线治疗,并出现大面积皮疹,经过4个周期的化学免疫疗法后迅速发展为TEN.皮肤毒性是一些最常见的免疫相关不良事件,同时使用抗PD-1和抗PD-L1药物,对应于一类效应。
    Aim: The emergence of antitumor immunotherapy has been beneficial for patients with tumors, but more attention should be paid to the toxic side effects of chemoimmunotherapy. Here we describe a patient with NK/T-cell lymphoma who developed toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) during treatment with a regimen consisting of sintilimab combined with pegaspargase, gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (P-GemOx). Case presentation: A patient received six cycles of P-GemOx chemotherapy as first-line treatment; 1 year later, he received the same dose of P-GemOx combined with sintilimab as chemoimmunotherapy due to recurrence of NK/T-cell lymphoma. He developed a massive rash that quickly developed into TEN after the fourth chemoimmunotherapy. Conclusion: Although rare, cases of fatal TEN caused by single-agent PD-1 inhibitor or gemcitabine have been reported. Careful attention to drug-related cutaneous toxicities is needed when these two agents are combined. This report highlights the significance of TEN as a rapid and serious adverse event induced by chemoimmunotherapy.
    Immune checkpoint inhibitors that block the interaction of PD-1 with its ligand, PD-L1, have been increasingly used in cancer therapy. However, some rare side effects induced by these drugs, such as toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), can be extremely dangerous. Here we describe a patient with natural killer/T-cell lymphoma who developed TEN during treatment with a combination of sintilimab and pegaspargase/gemcitabine/oxaliplatin (P-GemOx). The patient received six cycles of P-GemOx chemotherapy as first-line treatment and showed no skin reactions during or after treatment. However, 1 year later, the patient received the same dose of P-GemOx combined with sintilimab as second-line treatment for recurrent natural killer/T-cell lymphoma and developed a massive rash that quickly developed into TEN after four cycles of chemoimmunotherapy. Cutaneous toxicities are some of the most prevalent immune-related adverse events, both with anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 agents, which correspond to a class effect.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管在新型癌症治疗方面取得了显著进展,癌症患者的总体生存率和治疗效果仍不令人满意。化学免疫疗法,联合化疗药物和免疫治疗药物,已经成为一种有希望的癌症治疗方法,具有两种治疗机制协同作用的优势,减少药物的剂量,提高治疗效果。此外,纳米基药物递送系统(NDDS)被应用于包封化疗剂,肿瘤微环境反应和位点特异性释放。几种纳米载体已被批准用于临床癌症化疗,与传统制剂相比,治疗效率显着提高。如脂质体(Doxil®,Lipusu®),纳米粒子(Abraxane®)和胶束(Genexol-PM®)。将NDDS应用于化学免疫疗法将是未来癌症治疗的有力策略。可以大大提高治疗效果,减少副作用,优化癌症患者的临床预后。在这里,讨论了当前癌症免疫疗法和化学免疫疗法的方法,并对NDDS应用于化学免疫治疗的最新进展进行了综述。
    Although notable progress has been made on novel cancer treatments, the overall survival rate and therapeutic effects are still unsatisfactory for cancer patients. Chemoimmunotherapy, combining chemotherapeutics and immunotherapeutic drugs, has emerged as a promising approach for cancer treatment, with the advantages of cooperating two kinds of treatment mechanism, reducing the dosage of the drug and enhancing therapeutic effect. Moreover, nano-based drug delivery system (NDDS) was applied to encapsulate chemotherapeutic agents and exhibited outstanding properties such as targeted delivery, tumor microenvironment response and site-specific release. Several nanocarriers have been approved in clinical cancer chemotherapy and showed significant improvement in therapeutic efficiency compared with traditional formulations, such as liposomes (Doxil®, Lipusu®), nanoparticles (Abraxane®) and micelles (Genexol-PM®). The applications of NDDS to chemoimmunotherapy would be a powerful strategy for future cancer treatment, which could greatly enhance the therapeutic efficacy, reduce the side effects and optimize the clinical outcomes of cancer patients. Herein, the current approaches of cancer immunotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy were discussed, and recent advances of NDDS applied for chemoimmunotherapy were further reviewed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Diffuse large B cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) is a potentially curative lymphoma with increasing incidence with ageing. Treatment of elderly DLBCL patients represents a particular challenge due to their comorbidities and performance status.
    METHODS: A search for original articles focused on the treatment of elderly DLBCL patients was performed in PubMed database and 633 were found and reviewed. Thirty-eight studies meeting our inclusion criteria were published since 2007.
    RESULTS: Thirteen studies were retrospective and 25 phase II/III clinical trials. Most of them investigated the efficacy of dose-adjusted R-CHOP regimen. Alternative therapeutic drugs together with geriatric assessment were also evaluated. For fit patients aged 80 and over, the strongest evidence favours R-miniCHOP regimen.
    CONCLUSIONS: A dose-adjusted R-CHOP may be the recommended treatment in elderly DLBCL patients. New tools such as the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment provide useful guidance for treatment choice, based on comorbidities and frailty index of this group.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号