In human peripheral blood, the neutrophil granulocytes (neutrophils) are the most-abundant white blood cells. These professional phagocytes are rapidly recruited from the bloodstream to inflamed tissues by chemotactic factors that signal danger. Neutrophils, which express many receptors that are members of the large family of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), are critical for the elimination of pathogens and inflammatory insults, as well as for the resolution of inflammation leading to tissue repair. Danger-signaling molecular patterns such as the N-formylated peptides that are formed during bacterial and mitochondrial protein synthesis and recognized by formyl peptide receptors (FPRs) and free fatty acids recognized by free fatty acid receptors (FFARs) regulate neutrophil functions. Short peptides and short chain fatty acids activate FPR1 and FFA2R, respectively, while longer peptides and fatty acids activate FPR2 and GPR84, respectively. The activation profiles of these receptors include the release of reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated by the NADPH oxidase. Activation of the oxidase and the production of ROS are processes that are regulated by proinflammatory mediators, including TNFα and GM-CSF. The receptors have signaling and functional similarities, although there are also important differences, not only between the two closely related neutrophil FPRs, but also between the FPRs and the FFARs. In neutrophils, these receptors never walk alone, and additional mechanistic insights into the regulation of the GPCRs and the novel regulatory mechanisms underlying the activation of NADPH oxidase advance our understanding of the role of receptor transactivation in the regulation of inflammatory reactions.

OBJECTIVE: Metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 (mGlu1) is a promising therapeutic target for neurodegenerative CNS disorders including spinocerebellar ataxias (SCAs). Clinical reports have identified naturally-occurring mGlu1 mutations in rare SCA subtypes and linked symptoms to mGlu1 mutations. However, how mutations alter mGlu1 function remains unknown, as does amenability of receptor function to pharmacological rescue. Here, we explored SCA-associated mutation effects on mGlu1 cell surface expression, canonical signal transduction and allosteric ligand pharmacology.
METHODS: Orthosteric agonists, positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) and negative allosteric modulators (NAMs) were assessed at two functional endpoints (iCa2+ mobilisation and inositol 1-phosphate [IP1] accumulation) in FlpIn Trex HEK293A cell lines expressing five mutant mGlu1 subtypes. Key pharmacological parameters including ligand potency, affinity and cooperativity were derived using operational models of agonism and allostery.
RESULTS: mGlu1 mutants exhibited differential impacts on mGlu1 expression, with a C-terminus truncation significantly reducing surface expression. Mutations differentially influenced orthosteric ligand affinity, efficacy and functional cooperativity between allosteric and orthosteric ligands. Loss-of-function mutations L454F and N885del reduced orthosteric affinity and efficacy, respectively. A gain-of-function Y792C mutant mGlu1 displayed enhanced constitutive activity in IP1 assays, which manifested as reduced orthosteric agonist activity. The mGlu1 PAMs restored glutamate potency in iCa2+ mobilisation for loss-of-function mutations and mGlu1 NAMs displayed enhanced inverse agonist activity at Y792C relative to wild-type mGlu1.
CONCLUSIONS: Collectively, these data highlight distinct mechanisms by which mGlu1 mutations affect receptor function and show allosteric modulators may present a therapeutic strategy to restore aberrant mGlu1 function in rare SCA subtypes.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are one of the major drug targets. In recent years, computational drug design for GPCRs has mainly focused on static structures obtained through X-ray crystallography, cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM) or in silico modelling as a starting point for virtual screening campaigns. However, GPCRs are highly flexible entities with the ability to adopt different conformational states that elicit different physiological responses. Including this knowledge in the drug discovery pipeline can help to tailor novel conformation-specific drugs with an improved therapeutic profile. In this review, we outline our current knowledge about GPCR dynamics that is relevant for receptor activation, signalling bias and allosteric modulation. Ultimately, we highlight new technological implementations such as time-resolved X-ray crystallography and cryo-EM as well as computational algorithms that can contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of receptor dynamics and its relevance for GPCR functionality.

Fluorophores with color-shifting characteristics have attracted enormous research interest in the quantitative application of RNA sensors. It reports here a simple synthesis, luminescent properties, and co-transcription ability of de-conjugated triphenylmethane leucomalachite green (LMG). This novel clusteroluminescence fluorophore is rapidly synthesized from malachite green (MG) in reductive transcription system containing dithiothreitol, emitting fluorescence in the UV region through space conjugation. The co-transcribed MG RNA aptamer (MGA) bound to the ligand, resulting in red fluorescence from the through-bond conjugation. Given the equilibrated color-shifting fluorophores, they are rationally employed in a 3WJ-based rolling circle transcription switch, with the target-aptamer acting as an activator to achieve steric allosterism. This one-pot system allows the target to compete continuously for allosteric sites, and the activated transcription switches continue to amplify MGA forward, achieving accurate Aflatoxin 1 quantification at the picomolar level in 1 h. Due to the programmability of this RNA sensor, the design method of target-competitive aptamers is standardized, making it universally applicable.

The R-type voltage-gated calcium channel CaV2.3 is predominantly located in the presynapse and is implicated in distinct types of epileptic seizures. It has consequently emerged as a molecular target in seizure treatment. Here, we determined the cryo-EM structure of the CaV2.3-α2δ1-β1 complex in the topiramate-bound state at a 3.0 Å resolution. We provide a snapshot of the binding site of topiramate, a widely prescribed antiepileptic drug, on a voltage-gated ion channel. The binding site is located at an intracellular juxtamembrane hydrophilic cavity. Further structural analysis revealed that topiramate may allosterically facilitate channel inactivation. These findings provide fundamental insights into the mechanism underlying the inhibitory effect of topiramate on CaV and NaV channels, elucidating a previously unseen modulator binding site and thus pointing toward a route for the development of new drugs.

Acid-sensing ion channels (ASICs) are trimeric proton-gated cation channels that play a role in neurotransmission and pain sensation. The snake venom-derived peptides, mambalgins, exhibit potent analgesic effects in rodents by inhibiting central ASIC1a and peripheral ASIC1b. Despite their distinct species- and subtype-dependent pharmacology, previous structure-function studies have focussed on the mambalgin interaction with ASIC1a. Currently, the specific channel residues responsible for this pharmacological profile, and the mambalgin pharmacophore at ASIC1b remain unknown. Here we identify non-conserved residues at the ASIC1 subunit interface that drive differences in the mambalgin pharmacology from rat ASIC1a to ASIC1b, some of which likely do not make peptide binding interactions. Additionally, an amino acid variation below the core binding site explains potency differences between rat and human ASIC1. Two regions within the palm domain, which contribute to subtype-dependent effects for mambalgins, play key roles in ASIC gating, consistent with subtype-specific differences in the peptides mechanism. Lastly, there is a shared primary mambalgin pharmacophore for ASIC1a and ASIC1b activity, with certain peripheral peptide residues showing variant-specific significance for potency. Through our broad mutagenesis studies across various species and subtype variants, we gain a more comprehensive understanding of the pharmacophore and the intricate molecular interactions that underlie ligand specificity. These insights pave the way for the development of more potent and targeted peptide analogues required to advance our understating of human ASIC1 function and its role in disease.

OBJECTIVE: Activation of CB1 by exogenous agonists causes adverse effects in vivo. Positive allosteric modulation may offer improved therapeutic potential and a reduced on-target adverse effect profile compared with orthosteric agonists, due to reduced desensitisation/tolerance, but this has not been directly tested. This study investigated the ability of PAMs/ago-PAMs to induce receptor regulation pathways, including desensitisation and receptor internalisation.
METHODS: Bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) assays in HEK293 cells were performed to investigate G protein dissociation, ERK1/2 phosphorylation and β-arrestin 2 translocation, while immunocytochemistry was performed to measure internalisation of CB1 in response to the PAMs ZCZ011, GAT229 and ABD1236 alone and in combination with the orthosteric agonists AEA, 2-AG, and AMB-FUBINACA.
RESULTS: ZCZ011, GAT229 and ABD1236 were allosteric agonists in all pathways tested. The ago-PAM ZCZ011 induced a biphasic ERK1/2 phosphorylation time course compared to transient activation by orthosteric agonists. In combination with 2-AG but not AEA or AMB-FUBINACA, ZCZ011 and ABD1236 caused the transient peak of ERK1/2 phosphorylation to become sustained. All PAMs increased the potency and efficacy of AEA-induced signalling in all pathways tested; however, no notable potentiation of 2-AG or AMB-FUBINACA was observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Ago-PAMs can potentiate endocannabinoid CB1 agonism by AEA to a larger extent compared with 2-AG. However, all compounds were found to be allosteric agonists and induce activation of CB1 in the absence of endocannabinoid, including β-arrestin 2 recruitment and internalisation. Thus, the spatiotemporal signalling of endogenous cannabinoids will not be retained in vivo.

Dopaminergic neurons express a heteromer composed of the dopamine D3 receptor and the α4β2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, the D3R-nAChR heteromer, activated by both nicotine and dopamine D2 and D3 receptors agonists, such as quinpirole, and crucial for dopaminergic neuron homeostasis. We now report that D3R-nAChR heteromer activity is potentiated by 17-β-estradiol which acts as a positive allosteric modulator by binding a specific domain on the α4 subunit of the nicotinic receptor protomer. In mouse dopaminergic neurons, in fact, 17-β-estradiol significantly increased the ability of nicotine and quinpirole in promoting neuron dendritic remodeling and in protecting neurons against the accumulation of α-synuclein induced by deprivation of glucose, with a mechanism that does not involve the classical estrogen receptors. The potentiation induced by 17-β-estradiol required the D3R-nAChR heteromer since either nicotinic receptor or dopamine D3 receptor antagonists and interfering TAT-peptides, but not the estrogen receptor antagonist fulvestrant, specifically prevented 17-β-estradiol effects. Evidence of estrogens neuroprotection, mainly mediated by genomic mechanisms, have been provided, which is in line with epidemiological data reporting that females are less likely to develop Parkinson\'s Disease than males. Therefore, potentiation of D3R-nAChR heteromer activity may represent a further mechanism by which 17-β-estradiol reduces dopaminergic neuron vulnerability.

Although α2 was the first neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) receptor subunit to be cloned, due to its low level of expression in rodent brain, its study has largely been neglected. This study provides a comparison of the α2 and α4 structures and their functional similarities, especially in regard to the existence of low and high sensitivity forms based on subunit stoichiometry. We show that the pharmacological profiles of the low and high sensitivity forms of α2β2 and α4β2 receptors are very similar in their responses to nicotine, with high sensitivity receptors showing protracted responses. Sazetidine A, an agonist that is selective for the high sensitivity α4 receptors also selectively activates high sensitivity α2 receptors. Likewise, α2 receptors have similar responses as α4 receptors to the positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) desformylflustrabromine (dFBr) and NS9283. We show that the partial agonists for α4β2 receptors, cytisine and varenicline are also partial agonists for α2β2 receptors. Studies have shown that levels of α2 expression may be much higher in the brains of primates than those of rodents, suggesting a potential importance for human therapeutics. High-affinity nAChR have been studied in humans with PET ligands such as flubatine. We show that flubatine has similar activity with α2β2 and α4β2 receptors so that α2 receptors will also be detected in PET studies that have previously presumed to selectively detect α4β2 receptors. Therefore, α2 receptors need more consideration in the development of therapeutics to manage nicotine addiction and declining cholinergic function in age and disease.

Chemokine receptors are relevant targets for a multitude of immunological diseases, but drug attrition for these receptors is remarkably high. While many drug discovery programs have been pursued, most prospective drugs failed in the follow-up studies due to clinical inefficacy, and hence there is a clear need for alternative approaches. Allosteric modulators of receptor function represent an excellent opportunity for novel drugs, as they modulate receptor activation in a controlled manner and display increased selectivity, and their pharmacological profile can be insurmountable. Here, we discuss allosteric ligands and their pharmacological characterization for modulation of chemokine receptors. Ligands are included if (1) they show clear signs of allosteric modulation in vitro and (2) display evidence of binding in a topologically distinct manner compared to endogenous chemokines. We discuss how allosteric ligands affect binding of orthosteric (endogenous) ligands in terms of affinity as well as binding kinetics in radioligand binding assays. Moreover, their effects on signaling events in functional assays and how their binding site can be elucidated are specified. We substantiate this with examples of published allosteric ligands targeting chemokine receptors and hypothetical graphs of pharmacological behavior. This review should serve as an effective starting point for setting up assays for characterizing allosteric ligands to develop safer and more efficacious drugs for chemokine receptors and, ultimately, other G protein-coupled receptors.