Labor epidural analgesia (LEA) is associated with increased maternal body temperature; however, the responsible mechanism is unknown. Recent studies suggest that changes in EA affect the incidence of fever and that epidural sufentanil supplementation enhances analgesia and reduces the amount of local anesthetic. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different concentrations of sufentanil combined with ropivacaine on intrapartum fever during delivery. We performed a retrospective study comparing maternal fever rates in patients receiving labor analgesia between December 2018 and January 2019. Each patient receiving different concentrations of sufentanil in their EA received either proposal H (0.08% ropivacaine + 0.4 µg/mL sufentanil) or proposal L (0.08% ropivacaine + 0.2 µg/mL sufentanil), with the same nulliparous status. The primary outcome of this study was the incidence of intrapartum maternal fever, which was defined as any temperature ≥ 38°C during labor using Fisher exact test. Secondary outcome measures included visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, birth events, and neonatal outcomes. We observed a perinatal fever incidence rate of 11.7% in the group receiving proposal L, while the incidence rate was 19.8% in the group receiving proposal H (P = .001). Five hours after administration, the average body temperature of the puerpera decreased significantly in the proposal L group compared with proposal H group. In addition, treatment with 0.2 µg/mL sufentanil provided satisfactory pain relief during labor, shortened the first stage of labor and total labor time, reduced oxytocin use, and had no significant adverse effects on neonatal outcomes. EA may increase the risk of intrapartum epidural-associated fever. Compared with the 0.4 µg/mL sufentanil group, the 0.2 µg/mL sufentanil group can provide better analgesia and improve maternal fever. These retrospective results highlighted the importance of prospective and mechanistic studies of maternal fever associated with intraspinal analgesia.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of fast-track cardiac anesthesia using target-controlled infusion of sufentanil and propofol in valve replacement surgery. The clinical data of 88 patients with rheumatic heart disease undergoing valve replacement surgery were retrospectively analyzed and grouped based on different treatment methods. Among them, 44 cases received fast-track cardiac anesthesia using target-controlled infusion of fentanyl and propofol from November 2019 to July 2021 were set as the control group, and 44 cases received fast-track cardiac anesthesia using target-controlled infusion of sufentanil and propofol from August 2021 to February 2022 were set as the study group. The study group showed shorter postoperative awakening time, extubation time, and hospital stay duration, and lower dosage of dopamine and nitroglycerin consumption compared to the control group (P < .05). At T5 and T6, both groups exhibited higher ACTH, cortisol (Cor), and C3a than at T0, and the study group showed significantly lower ACTH, Cor, and C3a at T5 and T6 than the control group (P < .05). At T7, the control group showed higher ACTH, Cor, and C3a than at T0, and ACTH, Cor, and C3a were significantly lower in the study group than in the control group at T7 (P < .05). Fast-track cardiac anesthesia using target-controlled infusion of sufentanil and propofol in valve replacement surgery has demonstrated favorable application effects, which stabilizes hemodynamics, alleviates myocardial damage, suppresses endocrine stress responses, and does not increase adverse reactions, thereby exhibiting good safety.

BACKGROUND: Remifentanil is a short-acting opioid and can be administered during surgery without the risk of delayed postoperative recovery but concerns about hyperalgesia and the shortages of remifentanil lead anesthetists to consider long-acting opioids for Total Intravenous Anesthesia (TIVA). Sufentanil is a more potent opioid with a longer context-sensitive half-life but can promote good postoperative analgesia due to its residual effect. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the recovery profile of remifentanil and sufentanil for TIVA.
METHODS: The search strategy was performed in PubMed, CENTRAL, and Web of Science for RCTs comparing sufentanil and remifentanil as part of TIVA in adults undergoing noncardiac surgery. Risk of bias and the quality of evidence were performed using RoB2 and GRADEpro, respectively. The primary outcome was time to tracheal extubation. Secondary analyses included postoperative analgesia, respiratory depression, and Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV).
RESULTS: Sufentanil increases the time to extubate, MD = 4.29 min; 95% CI: 2.33 to 6.26; p = 0.001. It also reduces the need for postoperative rescue analgesia, logOR = -1.07; 95% CI: -1.62 to -0.52; p = 0.005. There were no significant differences between both opioids for PONV, logOR = 0.50; 95% CI: -0.10 to 1.10; p = 0.10 and respiratory depression, logOR = 1.21; 95% CI: -0.42 to 2.84; p = 0.15.
CONCLUSIONS: Sufentanil delays the time to tracheal extubation compared with remifentanil but is associated with a reduced need for postoperative rescue analgesia. No significant differences were observed between the two opioids in terms of postoperative respiratory depression or PONV.

BACKGROUND: Inadequate postoperative analgesia is associated with increased risks of various postoperative complications, longer hospital stay, decreased quality of life and higher costs.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the risk factors for moderate-to-severe postoperative pain within the first 24 hours and 24-48 hours after major hepatobiliary pancreatic surgery.
METHODS: Data of patients who underwent surgery at the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery in Henan Provincial People\'s Hospital were collected from January 2018 to August 2020. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify the risk factors of postoperative pain.
RESULTS: In total, 2180 patients were included in the final analysis. 183 patients (8.4%) suffered moderate-to-severe pain within 24 hours after operation. The independent risk factors associated with moderate-to-severe pain 24 hours after procedures were younger age (OR, 0.97; 95% CI 0.95 to 0.98, p<0.001), lower body mass index (BMI) (OR, 0.94; 95% CI 0.89 to 0.98, p=0.018), open surgery (OR, 0.34; 95% CI 0.22 to 0.52, p<0.001), and postoperative analgesia protocol with sufentanil (OR, 4.38; 95% CI 3.2 to 5.99, p<0.001). Postoperative hospital stay was longer in patients with inadequate analgesia (p<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Age, BMI, laparoscopic surgery, and different analgesic drugs were significant predictors of postoperative pain after major hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery.
BACKGROUND: ChiCTR2100049726.

As an oxidative stress and inflammation-related disease, cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury (CIRI) is a prevalent pathogenic factor of ischemic stroke (IS) and seriously degrades the life quality of human beings. As an opioid analgesic for anesthesia, Sufentanil (SUF) can activate the Nrf2 protein-induced anti-oxidant effects, which indicate that SUF may be used as alternative drug for CIRI therapy, but little is known regarding to its molecular mechanisms. Thus, this research aimed to examine whether SUF pre-treatment alleviated CIRI through the modulation of Nrf2 protein-mediated antioxidant activity. Our research revealed that middle cerebral artery occlusion/reperfusion (MCAO/R)-treated rats exhibited apparent CIRI-related symptoms and induced damages in rats\' brain, which were all notably mitigated in the MCAO/R rats. The subsequent in vitro cellular experiments verified that oxygen-glucose deprivation/reoxygenation (OGD/R)-induced cytotoxicity were apparently reversed by SUF co-treatment in HT22 and BV2 cells, and it was also validated that SUF was capable of suppressing inflammation and ferroptosis in CIRI models by inhibiting oxidative stress-related damages. Mechanistically, the Akt/GSK-3β pathway was excessively activated by SUF to promote Nrf2 protein expressions and enhance Nrf2-meidated anti-oxidant effects, and it was found that SUF-induced protective effects during CIRI progression were all abrogated by co-treating cells with MK2206 (Akt inhibitor), NP-12 (GSK-3β inhibitor), or ML385 (Nrf2 inhibitor). In conclusion, SUF activated the Akt/GSK-3β pathway to initiate Nrf2 protein-mediated antioxidant effects, which further suppressed oxidative stress-related inflammation and ferroptosis to ameliorate CIRI progression, and SUF could potentially be used as novel therapeutic agent for CIRI treatment in clinic.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with Postherpetic Neuralgia (PHN) often exhibit depressive-like symptoms, significantly impacting their quality of life. Esketamine, known for its analgesic properties, has also been recognized for its rapid antidepressant effects. However, its efficacy in the treatment of PHN requires further exploration. This study aims to evaluate the impact of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia(PICA) with esketamine on depressive mood in PHN patients.
METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed PHN patients hospitalized and treated at the affiliated hospital of Southwest Medical University from June 2021 to March 2023. Patients were divided into the esketamine group (E group) and the sufentanil group (S group) based on their treatment regimens. Primary outcomes included pain numerical rating scale(NRS), depression patient health questionaire-9(PHQ-9), and anxiety generalized anxiety disorder-7(GAD-7) scores measured before treatment, and at 3 days, 7 days, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months post-treatment.
RESULTS: A total of 83 patients were included in the analysis. Before treatment, there were no statistically significant differences in pain NRS, depression PHQ-9, and anxiety GAD-7 scores between the two groups (P > 0.05). Compared to before treatment, significant reductions in pain NRS scores were observed at all post-treatment time points in both groups (P < 0.05), with no differences between groups (P > 0.05). The E group exhibited significantly lower depression PHQ-9 scores than the S group at 3 days and 7 days post-treatment (P < 0.05), but no significant differences were observed at 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months (P > 0.05). Anxiety GAD-7 scores were significantly lower in the E group compared to the S group at 3 days, 7 days post-treatment (P < 0.05), with no statistical differences at 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months post-treatment (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Both PICA with esketamine and sufentanil alleviated pain equally in PHN patients. However, PICA with esketamine specifically improved early symptoms of anxiety and depression.

BACKGROUND: It was reported that either shorter programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) intervals or high-speed bolus can produce more extensive epidural spread. We hypothesized that a combination of shortened time interval and increased speed of epidural bolus might further improve analgesic effect and therefore reduce the hourly volume for epidural labour analgesia.
METHODS: This double-blind dose-finding study used a biased coin up-and-down sequential allocation method to determine the 90% effective bolus volume of ropivacaine combined with sufentanil while using the push pump at a rate of 400 mL/hr and interval of 30 min to provide effective analgesia without breakthrough pain. We used 0.1% ropivacaine with 0.4 µg/mL sufentanil, with bolus volumes ranging from 3 to 6 mL. The first patient was assigned a volume of 3 mL, and the remaining volumes were assigned according to the biased coin-up-and-down method.
RESULTS: The estimated 90% effective volume (EV90) of ropivacaine combined with sufentanil for epidural labour analgesia at a time interval of 30 min was 4.88 mL (95% confidence interval 4.83-5.38).
CONCLUSIONS: The optimum bolus volume of ropivacaine with sufentanil while using push pump at a time interval of 30 min is approximately 5 mL. It could probably further reduce the hourly bolus volume for epidural labour analgesia.

Hemorrhage is a leading cause of death in the pre-hospital setting. Since pain often accompanies a hemorrhagic insult, the administered pain medication must not interfere with critical autonomic regulation of arterial blood pressure and vital organ perfusion. The purpose of this study was to test two unique hypotheses: a) sublingual sufentanil (Dsuvia) impairs tolerance to progressive central hypovolemia, and b) sublingual sufentanil attenuates pain sensation and the accompanying cardiovascular responses to a noxious stimulus. Twenty-nine adults participated in this double-blinded, randomized, crossover, placebo-controlled trial. Following sublingual administration of sufentanil (30 μg) or placebo, participants completed a progressive lower-body negative pressure (LBNP) challenge to tolerance, followed by a cold pressor test (CPT) after LBNP recovery. Addressing the first aim, tolerance to LBNP was not different between trials (p = 0.495). Decreases in systolic blood pressure from baseline to the end of LBNP also did not differ between trials (time: p<0.001, trial p=0.477, interaction p=0.587). Finally, increases in heart rate from baseline to the end of LBNP did not differ between trials (time: p < 0.001, trial p= p=0.626, interaction p = 0.424). Addressing the second aim, sufentanil attenuated perceived pain (p < 0.001) in response to the CPT, though the magnitude of the change in mean blood pressure during the CPT (p = 0.078) was not different between trials. These data demonstrate that sublingual sufentanil does not impair tolerance to progressive central hypovolemia. Additionally, sublingual sufentanil attenuates perceived pain, but not the accompanying mean blood pressure responses to the CPT.

BACKGROUND: Minor but painful medical procedures are often handled at the operating room. If safe and effective treatment options are available many procedures may be performed outside of the operating room.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to assess the adverse events of intranasal s-ketamine and/or sufentanil alone or as part of a multimodal analgesic regime for medical procedures outside of the operating room. Secondary outcomes included analgesic effect, doses and indications for use.
METHODS: Retrospective observational study.
METHODS: Tertiary care paediatric hospital.
METHODS: Children 1 year up till 18 years.
METHODS: Intranasal (IN) sufentanil (S), intranasal s-ketamine (K) or the free combination of the two drugs (SK).
METHODS: The frequency of adverse events including serious adverse events reported by intervention.
RESULTS: Between 2004 and 2014, 2185 medical procedures were registered, including 652 procedures with IN SK, 1469 procedures with IN S and 64 procedures with IN K. The children\'s median age was 5.6 years (range 1.0-17.9). Medical procedures with at least one adverse event were 18% with IN SK, 25% with IN K and 18% with IN S. Common adverse events included episodes of vomiting (9%), nausea (8%) and dizziness (3%). In two patients receiving IN S, serious adverse events occurred. One patient had respiratory depression and bronchospasm and another patient with cerebral palsy had a seizure. Both were handled immediately and did not result in any sequelae. The median doses of intranasal sufentanil were 38% lower when combined with s-ketamine (IN SK free combination: sufentanil dose 0.5 μg/kg (range 0.2-1.3) and s-ketamine dose 0.5 mg/kg (range 0.2-1.5). IN S monotherapy, sufentanil dose 0.8 μg/kg (range 0.2-2.7)). Similar analgesic effect was reported for S and SK.
CONCLUSIONS: Intranasal sufentanil and/or s-ketamine are feasible for the treatment of procedural pain in an ambulatory setting with appropriate per- and post-procedural observations and trained staff.

OBJECTIVE: Gastroscopy is one of the most commonly used diagnostic modalities for upper gastrointestinal disorders. Remazolam besylate, a new type of ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine drug, has been less studied in gastroscopy. In this study, we studied the efficacy and safety of remazolam combined with propofol for painless gastroscopy.
METHODS: This was a single-center, placebo-controlled randomized trial.
METHODS: One hundred patients undergoing painless gastroscopy were included in this study and randomly divided into 2 groups (n = 50 per group): the control group (Con group) and the remazolam group (Rem group). Sufentanil, remazolam, and propofol were used to anesthetize the patients, and then, the effects of different solutions on these patients were compared and analyzed. The patient\'s general condition, vital signs at different times, the dosage of propofol (mg) and additional times, complications, duration of gastroscopy (minutes), recovery time (minutes), length of stay in the recovery room (minutes), and adverse reactions were recorded.
RESULTS: Rem group systolic blood pressure was more stable (P < .05). The amount of additional propofol in Rem group was less (P < .05). The incidence of hypotension, bradycardia, and dizziness was lower in Rem group, as well as the time of awakening and stay in the recovery room were shorter (P < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: Remazolam combined with sufentanil and propofol has less effect on hemodynamics in painless gastroscopy, and the patients have shorter awakening times.