BACKGROUND: Spinal tumors (ST) often result in dire prognosis, carrying risks such as permanent paralysis, sensory loss, and sphincter dysfunction. Data on their incidence and etiology in pediatric populations are markedly scant. Our study investigates the etiology, clinical manifestation, treatment, and outcomes of pediatric ST.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of our institutional pediatric oncology and neurosurgery database, examining 14 patients under 18 years admitted with ST due to oncological diseases since 2005. We analyzed the clinical presentations, evaluations, molecular diagnostics and treatments for these patients.
RESULTS: The study spanned 15 years and included 14 pediatric patients, each diagnosed with distinct spinal tumor entity. The mean patient age was approximately 19.6 ± 10.1 months. Severe axial pain along the vertebral column was observed in 13 patients, while acute neurological deterioration manifested in 7 patients. As a first-line intervention, 13 patients underwent decompressive surgery through laminectomy and tumor resection, and only one patient received chemotherapy solely. Before surgery, seven patients were unable to walk; post-surgery, six of them regained their ability to ambulate. The diagnosis encompassed a range of neoplasms: two instances of Ewing sarcoma, 3 instances of teratoma, one case presenting an atypical teratoid Rhabdoid tumor, two instances each of low-grade astrocytoma and neuroblastoma, and single instances of ependymoma, meningioma, rhabdomyosarcoma, and embryonal tumors with multilayered rosettes (ETMRs). Three patients succumbed two years after initiating therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite their rarity, intraspinal tumors in pediatric patients pose substantial therapeutic challenges. The intertwined complexities of the disease entity and the patient\'s neurological status demand swift initiation of an individualized therapeutic strategy. This crucial step helps optimize outcomes for this patient cohort, who frequently grapple with debilitating health conditions. Inclusion of these patients within a registry is mandatory to optimize treatment outcomes due to their rarity in pediatric population.

暂无摘要。

Genes encoding subunits of SWI/SNF (BAF) chromatin remodeling complexes are mutated in nearly 25% of cancers. To gain insight into the mechanisms by which SWI/SNF mutations drive cancer, we contributed ten rhabdoid tumor (RT) cell lines mutant for SWI/SNF subunit SMARCB1 to a genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 depletion screen performed across 896 cell lines. We identify PHF6 as specifically essential for RT cell survival and demonstrate that dependency on Phf6 extends to Smarcb1-deficient cancers in vivo. As mutations in either SWI/SNF or PHF6 can cause the neurodevelopmental disorder Coffin-Siris syndrome, our findings of a dependency suggest a previously unrecognized functional link. We demonstrate that PHF6 co-localizes with SWI/SNF complexes at promoters, where it is essential for maintenance of an active chromatin state. We show that in the absence of SMARCB1, PHF6 loss disrupts the recruitment and stability of residual SWI/SNF complex members, collectively resulting in the loss of active chromatin at promoters and stalling of RNA Polymerase II progression. Our work establishes a mechanistic basis for the shared syndromic features of SWI/SNF and PHF6 mutations in CSS and the basis for selective dependency on PHF6 in SMARCB1-mutant cancers.

BACKGROUND: Uterine tumors resembling ovarian sex cord tumors (UTROSCT) with rhabdoid features are uncommon mesenchymal neoplasms exhibiting diverse histological patterns, including significant rhabdoid morphology. A thorough comprehension of their clinicopathologic features is crucial for precise diagnosis and effective management.
METHODS: This study presents 4 cases of UTROSCT with rhabdoid features, diagnosed in patients aged 31 to 58. Varied recurrence patterns were observed, including similar recurrent lesions to the primary tumors with subsequent mortality, initial invasion and lymph node metastasis, and presence of only primary tumor.
METHODS: Histopathological examination revealed diverse morphological patterns, prominently featuring rhabdoid differentiation. Immunohistochemical analysis showed expression of hormone receptors, sex cord, smooth muscle, and epithelial markers, notably WT1, CD56, and CD99. Molecular analysis identified ESR1-NCOA2 fusions and ESR1 and NCOA2/3 rearrangements, indicating a potential association between these genetic alterations and extensive rhabdoid differentiation.
METHODS: Various treatments were administered post-recurrence, including chemotherapy and targeted therapies. However, poor clinical outcomes were observed in all cases.
RESULTS: Despite aggressive treatments, including chemotherapy and targeted therapies, poor clinical outcomes were observed, highlighting the aggressive nature of UTROSCT with significant rhabdoid differentiation.
CONCLUSIONS: This case series emphasizes the importance of detailed pathological reporting, comprehensive molecular testing, and thorough tumor staging in UTROSCT cases with rhabdoid features. Enhanced understanding of the clinicopathologic characteristics of UTROSCT with rhabdoid differentiation is crucial for accurate diagnosis, prognostication, and management strategies.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to detect candidate oncogenes of rhabdoid tumor of the kidney (RTK) and evaluate their roles in RTK in vitro.
METHODS: An integrated analysis of messenger RNA (mRNA) and microRNA (miRNA) sequencing was performed to determine the expression profile of exosome-derived miRNAs and mRNAs in human RTK-derived cell lines and a human embryonic renal cell line. A Gene Ontology enrichment analysis was performed to analyze the functional characteristics of differentially expressed mRNAs in RTK cells. Matrigel invasion and wound-healing assays were performed to evaluate the cell invasion and migration abilities.
RESULTS: Forty mRNAs were highly expressed in RTK cells targeted by exosomal miRNAs, the expression of which was lower in RTK cells than in the controls. These mRNAs were primarily related to cell adhesion. Of these mRNAs, we selected neuropilin 1 (NRP1) as a candidate oncogene because its upregulated expression is associated with a poor prognosis of several types of tumors. RTK cells in which NRP1 had been knocked down exhibited decreased invasive and migratory abilities.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that NRP1 acts as an oncogene by promoting the invasion and migration of RTK cells and that it could serve as a therapeutic target.

BACKGROUND: Rhabdoid tumors (RT) are aggressive, rare tumors predominantly affecting young children, characterized by bi-allelic SMARCB1 gene inactivation. While most SMARCB1 alterations are acquired de novo, a third of cases exhibit germline alterations, defining Rhabdoid Tumors Predisposition Syndrome (RTPS1). With increased sensitivity of next-generation sequencing (NGS), mosaicisms in genes linked to genetic diseases are more detectable. This study focuses on exploring SMARCB1 germline alterations, notably mosaicism in blood samples of children with RT and in parents, using a custom NGS panel.
METHODS: A cohort of 280 children and 140 parents with germline analysis was studied. Germline DNA from 111 children with RT and 32 parents were re-analyzed with a custom NGS panel with 1,500X average depth targeting the SMARCB1 gene to identify intragenic variants not detected with conventional low-sensitivity methods. Follow-up data was obtained for 77 patients.
RESULTS: Nine previously undetected mosaicism cases were identified, totaling 17/280 patients with a mosaic variant (6.1%) in the cohort, with variant allele frequencies between 0.9% and 33%, thus highlighting the prior underestimation of its prevalence. Follow-up data showed that 4 out of 7 survivors with mosaic variants developed distinct novel tumors, two sharing SMARCB1 alterations with the initial tumor, emphasizing the potential clinical impact of SMARCB1 mosaicism.
CONCLUSIONS: The hitherto underestimated rate of SMARCB1 mosaicism in RT underscores the need for optimized genetic counseling and oncological monitoring. The findings have significant medical implications, considering the dire prognosis of RT.

Malignant rhabdoid tumors (MRTs) are rare but lethal solid neoplasms that overwhelmingly affect infants and young children. While the central nervous system is the most common site of occurrence, tumors can develop at other sites, including the kidneys and soft tissues throughout the body. The anatomic site of involvement dictates tumor nomenclature and nosology. While the clinical and imaging manifestations of MRTs and other more common entities may overlap, there are some site-specific distinctive imaging characteristics. Irrespective of the site of occurrence, somatic and germline mutations in SMARCB1, and rarely in SMARCA4, underlie the entire spectrum of rhabdoid tumors. MRTs have a simple and remarkably stable genome but can demonstrate considerable molecular and biologic heterogeneity. Related neoplasms encompass an expanding category of phenotypically dissimilar (nonrhabdoid tumors driven by SMARC-related alterations) entities. US, CT, MRI, and fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT or PET/MRI facilitate diagnosis, initial staging, and follow-up, thus informing therapeutic decision making. Multifocal synchronous or metachronous rhabdoid tumors occur predominantly in the context of underlying rhabdoid tumor predisposition syndromes (RTPSs). These autosomal dominant disorders are driven in most cases by pathogenic variants in SMARCB1 (RTPS type 1) and rarely by pathogenic variants in SMARCA4 (RTPS type 2). Genetic testing and counseling are imperative in RTPS. Guidelines for imaging surveillance in cases of RTPS are based on age at diagnosis. ©RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.

Aim: Atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor (ATRT) is a rare and highly aggressive primary CNS neoplasm, predominantly observed in children. The use of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in pediatric ATRT has shown promise; however, its utility in adult ATRT remains unclear. Patients & methods: This study presents the case of an adult patient with ATRT who is in remission after ASCT and reviews the literature on ASCT in adults with ATRT. Four cases of ATRT in adults who underwent ASCT were identified, with pertinent data summarized. Results: All five patients survived longer than the historical average survival rate, four of whom had no clinical or radiographic evidence of disease at the final follow-up. Conclusion: Based on limited data, there may be a role for ASCT in the treatment of adults with ATRT.
[Box: see text].

BACKGROUND: Survival data for recurrent pediatric atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor (ATRT) and its association to molecular groups are extremely limited.
METHODS: Single-institution retrospective study of 64 children less than 21 years old with recurrent or treatment-refractory (progressive disease [PD]) ATRT treated at St. Jude Hospital from January 2000 to December 2020. Demographic, clinicopathologic, treatment, molecular grouping (SHH, TYR, and MYC) and germline data were collected. Progression-free survival (PFS2: time from PD to subsequent first progression) and overall survival (OSpostPD: time from PD to death/last follow-up) were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis.
RESULTS: Median age at and time from initial diagnosis to PD were 2.1 years (range: 0.5-17.9 years) and 5.4 months (range: 0.5-125.6 months), respectively. Only five of 64 children (7.8%) are alive at median follow-up of 10.9 (range: 4.2-18.1) years from PD. The 2/5-year PFS2 and OSpostPD were 3.1% (±1.8%)/1.6% (±1.1%) and 20.3% (±4.8%)/7.3% (±3.5%), respectively. Children with TYR group (n = 10) had a better OSpostPD compared to those with MYC (n = 11) (2-year survival estimates: 60.0% ± 14.3% vs. 18.2% ± 9.5%; p = .019), or those with SHH (n = 21; 4.8% ± 3.3%; p = .014). In univariate analyses, OSpostPD was better with older age at diagnosis (p = .037), female gender (p = .008), and metastatic site of PD compared to local or combined sites of PD (p < .001). Two-year OSpostPD for patients receiving any salvage therapy (n = 39) post PD was 33.3% ± 7.3%.
CONCLUSIONS: Children with recurrent/refractory ATRT have dismal outcomes. Older age at diagnosis, female gender, TYR group, and metastatic site of PD were associated with relatively longer survival in our study.

Individuals with 21 trisomy or Down syndrome (DS) are known to have an increased risk of acute leukemia, while they rarely develop solid or central nervous system (CNS) tumors. Atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor (ATRT) is a highly aggressive CNS-WHO grade 4 neoplasm, which has never been reported in association with Down syndrome. We present a case study of a 14-year-old female with Down syndrome, diagnosed with intradural-extramedullary spinal ATRT. The chief complaints included bilateral lower limb weakness, constipation, and urinary incontinence for 2 weeks. Surgery was scheduled, and a biopsy was taken. The histopathology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular analysis confirmed the diagnosis of the ATRT-MYC/group 2B subgroup. This report highlights the challenges of managing a patient with complex medical conditions. Moreover, it adds to the existing literature on CNS tumors in patients with Down syndrome.