Purpura

紫癜
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    血栓性血小板减少性紫癜,特别是它的免疫介导变体(iTTP),需要准确的诊断方法来进行有效的管理。
    比较化学发光免疫测定法(CLIA)和酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)在iTTP患者中检测ADAMTS-13活性和检测抗ADAMTS-13自身抗体(AAb)。
    这项研究涉及来自12名iTTP患者的31个配对样本。使用HemosILAcuStar测量ADAMTS-13活性(仪器实验室,CLIA)和Technozym(技术克隆)活性测定(ELISA)。在与正常池血浆混合后,在Bethesda测定法中使用TechnozymADAMTS-13-INH测定法(ELISA)和HemosILAcuStar活性(CLIA)评估了AAbs的存在。使用HYDRASYS-2SCAN系统和HYDRAGEL5-或11-VWMultimer试剂盒(Sebia)分析血管性血友病因子(VWF)多聚体。用HemosILAcuStarVWF:GPIbR在ACLAcuStar分析仪(IL)上测量VWF活性水平。
    对于ADAMTS-13活动,证实了CLIA和ELISA之间的强线性关系和无偏差(斜率=1.01[0.91,1.11],截距=0.00[-0.47,0])。然而,在ADAMTS-13活性在10%至50%之间的缓解期,在AAb检测中发现了显着差异,CLIA和ELISA显示出显着差异(P<.001,Cohen\sg=0.34)。始终如一,VWF多聚体和活性水平在ADAMTS-13活性低于50%和高于50%的缓解样品之间表现出显著不同的值。在多次iTTP复发患者的纵向分析中,在预测急性加重时,CLIA阳性似乎先于ELISA。
    虽然CLIA和ELISA对于评估ADAMTS-13活性可能是可互换的,它们不等同于检测AAbs,特别是在ADAMTS-13活性在10%至50%之间的临床缓解患者中。
    UNASSIGNED: Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, particularly its immune-mediated variant (iTTP), necessitates accurate diagnostic approaches for effective management.
    UNASSIGNED: To compare a chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) and an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for testing ADAMTS-13 activity and detecting anti-ADAMTS-13 autoantibodies (AAbs) in patients with iTTP.
    UNASSIGNED: This study involved 31 paired samples from 12 iTTP patients. ADAMTS-13 activity was measured using the HemosIL AcuStar (Instrumentation Laboratory, CLIA) and Technozym (Technoclone) activity assay (ELISA). The presence of AAbs was assessed using Technozym ADAMTS-13-INH assay (ELISA) and HemosIL AcuStar activity (CLIA) within a Bethesda assay following mixing with normal pool plasma. von Willebrand factor (VWF) multimers were analyzed using the HYDRASYS-2 SCAN system and the HYDRAGEL 5- or 11-VW Multimer kits (Sebia). VWF activity levels were measured with the HemosIL AcuStar VWF:GPIbR on the ACL AcuStar Analyzer (IL).
    UNASSIGNED: For ADAMTS-13 activity, a strong linear relationship and no bias between CLIA and ELISA were confirmed (slope = 1.01 [0.91, 1.11], intercept = 0.00 [-0.47, 0]). However, significant discrepancies were found in AAb detection during remission phases with ADAMTS-13 activity between 10% and 50%, with CLIA and ELISA showing significant divergence (P < .001, Cohen\'s g = 0.34). Consistently, VWF multimers and activity levels exhibited significantly different values between remission samples with ADAMTS-13 activity below 50% and above 50%. In longitudinal analysis of patients with multiple iTTP relapses, positivity to CLIA appears to precede ELISA in predicting exacerbations.
    UNASSIGNED: While CLIA and ELISA might be interchangeable for assessing ADAMTS-13 activity, they are not equivalent for detecting AAbs, particularly in patients in clinical remission with ADAMTS-13 activity between 10% and 50%.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    年龄较大的澳大利亚人皮肤撕裂的风险增加,这种风险并不总是被认识到,或者伤害是可以预防的。这项研究外部验证了Rayner等人。(2019)皮肤撕裂风险预测模型在一个独立的老年队列中,Fitzpatrick皮肤类型I-IV来自多个住宿护理场所,在6个月的时间里。共有362名年龄在65至102.5岁之间的人完成了这项研究。总之,165名居民遭受了一次或多次皮肤撕裂。对五个变量(性别、皮肤流泪的历史,以前的瀑布历史,紫癜和日光弹性沉着)在皮肤撕裂模型中鉴定。皮肤撕裂模型为正确分类处于危险或不处于危险中的居民提供了\'好\'到几乎\'非常好的歧视\'(0.799[95%置信区间的曲线下面积,CI:0.75-0.84])。皮肤撕裂模型正确预测了75.8%(敏感性)的皮肤撕裂参与者和71.6%(特异性)的没有皮肤撕裂的居民。该模型表明,它可以作为一种筛查工具来识别有皮肤撕裂风险的老年人,并且由于易于使用,因此有利于临床实践。是可重复的,并且在FitzpatrickI-IV型皮肤的老年护理居民中具有良好的准确性。
    Older Australians are at increased risk of skin tears with the risk not always recognised or the injury able to be prevented. This study externally validated Rayner et al. (2019) Skin Tear Risk Prediction Model in an independent aged cohort with a Fitzpatrick skin types I-IV from across multiple residential-care sites, over a 6-month period. A total of 362 individuals aged between 65 and 102.5 years completed the study. In all, 165-residents sustained one or more skin tears. Logistic regression analysis was conducted of the five variables (gender, previous history of skin tears, previous history of falls, purpura and solar elastosis) identified in the skin tear model. The skin tear model provided \'good\' to nearly \'very good discrimination\' for correctly classifying residents at-risk or not-at-risk (area under the curve of 0.799 [95% confidence interval, CI: 0.75-0.84]). The skin tear model correctly predicted 75.8% (sensitivity) of participants with skin tears and 71.6% (specificity) of residents without skin tears. The model demonstrated it could work as a screening tool to identify older individuals at risk of skin tears and would benefit clinical practice as it was easy to use, was reproducible, and had good accuracy across aged-care residents with a Fitzpatrick skin type I-IV.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    激光脱毛(LHR)已被确立为用于消除多余毛发的安全且有效的方法。本研究旨在调查LHR并发症的发生频率并评估其影响因素。在一年中,评估了16,900名接受LHR治疗的患者的并发症。对于每种情况,选择了两个外部对照(根据年龄匹配,性别,Fitzpatrick皮肤型(FST)III-IV,和治疗的解剖区域)。为了评估解剖区域对并发症发生的影响,如果在同一疗程期间接受其他区域治疗,则每位患者均用作内部对照.采用GEE分析进行统计学分析。LHR并发症的发生率为0.69%。最常见的并发症是瘀斑,紫癜,瘀斑(31.66%),其次是色素沉着变化(20.0%)。LHR并发症最常见于下肢(32.0%),面部和颈部(23.3%),以及生殖器和大腿(22.3%),分别。可能的危险因素为年龄较小(OR=0.74,P值≤0.001),在头部和颈部操作LHR(OR=5.8,P值=0.022),利用翠绿宝石激光(OR=2.32,P值=0.011),和宝石激光中的通量(OR=3.47,P值=0.003)。总的来说,这项研究的结果表明,LHR通常是去除多余毛发的安全方法。然而,因素,如年龄,面部区域的治疗,在FSTIII-IV患者中,尤其是在通量水平较高的情况下,使用翠绿宝石激光被确定为潜在的危险因素。
    Laser hair removal (LHR) has been established as a safe and efficient method for eliminating unwanted hair. This study aimed to investigate the frequency of LHR complications and assess the contributing factors. During one year, 16,900 patients undergoing LHR therapy were evaluated for complications. For each case, two external controls were selected (matched based on age, sex, Fitzpatrick skin type (FST) III-IV, and the treated anatomical region). To assess the impact of anatomical region on complication occurrence, each patient was used as their internal control if another area was treated during the same session. GEE analysis was used for statistical analysis.The incidence of LHR complications was calculated to be 0.69%. The most common complications were petechia, purpura, and ecchymosis (31.66%) followed by pigmentation changes (20.0%). LHR complications were most commonly observed in the lower limbs (32.0%), face and neck (23.3%), and genitalia and thighs (22.3%), respectively. Possible risk factors were younger age (OR = 0.74, P-value ≤ 0.001), operating LHR in the head and neck (OR = 5.8, P-value = 0.022), utilization of the alexandrite laser (OR = 2.32, P-value = 0.011), and fluence in the Alexandrite laser (OR = 3.47, P-value = 0.003).Overall, the results of this study indicate that LHR is generally a safe method for removing unwanted hair. However, factors such as younger age, treatment of the facial area, and use of the alexandrite laser especially with higher fluence levels in patients with FST III-IV were identified as potential risk factors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:利多卡因/丙胺卡因(EMLA)乳膏是一种局部麻醉药,在痛苦的治疗过程中应用于皮肤或粘膜,几乎没有报道的副作用。
    方法:这里,我们报告使用皮肤镜检查来确定一例红斑伴紫癜,一种罕见的副作用,后应用5%EMLA乳膏。
    结论:我们得出结论,紫癜性红斑是由与EMLA相关的刺激和毒性引起的,但是毒性物质影响皮肤血管的具体机制尚不清楚。为了应对这种情况和化妆品的需求,我们推荐氨甲环酸,除了常规治疗,防止皮炎患者色素沉着的变化。
    BACKGROUND: Lidocaine/prilocaine (EMLA) cream is a local anesthetic that is applied to the skin or mucosa during painful therapeutic procedures with few reported side effects.
    METHODS: Here, we report the use of dermatoscopy to identify a case of erythema with purpura, a rare side effect, after the application of 5% EMLA cream.
    CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that erythema with purpura is caused by irritation and toxicity associated with EMLA, but the specific mechanism by which the toxic substance affects skin blood vessels is unclear. In response to this situation and for cosmetic needs, we recommend tranexamic acid, in addition to routine therapy, to prevent changes in pigmentation in patients with dermatitis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    在施用mRNA-1273SARS-CoV-2(Moderna)疫苗后,出现了独特的皮肤病理学事件。具体来说,第2次疫苗接种后5天出现短暂性紫癜性界面性皮炎,出现红斑丘疹,并有多形红斑.一名患者在疫苗接种后出现了紫癜性界面性皮炎,并伴有微囊泡,最终没有后遗症。
    A unique dermatopathology incident arose after administration of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 (Moderna) vaccine. Specifically, a transient purpuric interface dermatitis occurred 5 days post-second vaccine with the presentation of erythematous papules with erythema multiforme-type findings. A patient developed purpuric interface dermatitis with micro-vesiculation post-vaccination which ultimately resolved without sequelae.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    感染性心内膜炎(IE)可表现为多种体征和症状,包括皮肤损伤。描述IE和血管炎之间关系的几篇论文分为IE能够模仿血管炎和IE确实与涉及皮肤的血管炎有关,肾,胃肠道,或周围神经。对于临床医生来说,区分孤立性血管炎是很重要的,感染性心内膜炎,和IE相关血管炎,因为治疗和结果不同。我们报告了一例有静脉(IV)药物使用史的患者,最初表现为胸痛,在诊断耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)IE后开始使用万古霉素,离开医疗建议(AMA),然后因出现紫癜性皮疹而返回医院。我们认为,尽管由于时间延迟他没有进行皮肤活检,他的对称分布紫癜与皮肤血管炎一致。他的症状,包括皮疹和急性肾损伤(AKI),用抗生素治疗心内膜炎。
    Infective endocarditis (IE) can present with a variety of signs and symptoms, including skin lesions. The few papers describing a relationship between IE and vasculitis are split between IE being able to mimic vasculitis and between IE indeed being associated with a vasculitis involving the skin, kidney, gastrointestinal tract, or peripheral nerves. It is important for clinicians to distinguish between an isolated vasculitis, infective endocarditis, and IE-associated vasculitis because the treatments and outcomes are different. We report a case of a patient with a history of intravenous (IV) drug use who initially presented with chest pain, was started on vancomycin following diagnosis of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) IE, left against medical advice (AMA), and then returned to the hospital due to development of a purpuric rash. We contend that while he did not have a skin biopsy due to time delay, his symmetrically distributed purpura was consistent with cutaneous vasculitis. His symptoms, including his rash and an acute kidney injury (AKI), improved with antibiotics to treat the endocarditis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    特发性血小板减少性紫癜(ITP)在管理方面面临挑战,特别是在皮质类固醇难治性病例中。血小板生成素受体(TPO-R)激动剂,比如eltrombopag,提供替代治疗选择。我们报告了一例72岁的南亚男性,患有类固醇难治性慢性ITP,每两周一次给药eltrombopag均获得了良好的反应。血小板反应与每日给药相当,提示频率较低的给药方案的疗效。这种方法可以增强患者的依从性并减少与治疗相关的经济负担。每两周一次给药eltrombopag为慢性ITP管理提供了一个有希望的替代方案,保证进一步调查。
    Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) presents challenges in management, particularly in cases refractory to corticosteroids. Thrombopoietin receptor (TPO-R) agonists, such as eltrombopag, offer alternative therapeutic options. We report a case of a 72-year-old South Asian male with steroid-refractory chronic ITP who achieved a favorable response with biweekly eltrombopag dosing. Platelet response was comparable to daily dosing, suggesting the efficacy of less frequent administration schedules. This approach may enhance patient adherence and reduce treatment-related financial burdens. Biweekly eltrombopag dosing presents a promising alternative for chronic ITP management, warranting further investigation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号