Oxytocics

Oxytocics
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    A 27-yr-old female pygmy hippopotamus (Choeropsis liberiensis) had two consecutive stillbirths with no overt signs of labor, suggestive of uterine inertia. After a third pregnancy was confirmed, an induction protocol was developed. Cloprostenol and betamethasone were administered on d 200 of gestation (time 0 h). Additional doses of cloprostenol were administered at 24 and 48 h and oxytocin at 30, 31, and 48 h. Each injection resulted in preparturient behavior without overt evidence of contractions. Fetal membranes presented at the vulva at 54.5 h after initial cloprostenol and betamethasone administration with no progression of labor. Transvaginal palpation and manual delivery of a live calf followed. Despite confirmed nursing, the serum glutaraldehyde coagulation test was negative. Failure of passive transfer may have been secondary to the induction protocol. The calf was treated with broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents due to diarrhea, and clinical signs resolved. This clinical brief details the first known induction of parturition in a pygmy hippopotamus, which can serve as the basis for further development of the technique.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的目的是比较两种引产方案(4和6小时),为了确定阴道内米索前列醇25μg片剂成功引产的预测因素,并评估与不良围产期结局的关系。
    方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,包括在妊娠37至42周期间接受25μg米索前列醇阴道内片剂引产的单胎妊娠。孕妇分为两组:第1组-阴道内米索前列醇每4小时25μg,第2组-阴道内米索前列醇每6小时25μg。
    结果:孕妇分为第1组(n=289)和第2组(n=278)。第1组阴道内米索前列醇25μg片剂的中位数较高(3.0vs.2.0片,p<0.001),产后出血的患病率较低(7.6vs.32.7%,p<0.001),与第2组相比,对催产素的需求更高(比值比[OR]:2.1,95CI:1.47-2.98,p<0.001)。模型包括阴道内米索前列醇25μg片剂,每4和6小时[x2(1)=23.7,OR:4.35,p<0.0001],奇偶校验[x2(3)=39.4,OR:0.59,p=0.031],Bishop评分[x2(4)=10.8,OR:0.77,p=0.019]是引产失败的最佳预测因子。在开始(Breslowp<0.001)和积极分娩阶段(LongHankp=0.002)时使用第一片阴道内米索前列醇25μg片剂之间观察到两组之间的统计学差异。
    结论:每4小时使用米索前列醇25μg的孕妇从引产到活跃期开始的时间更长,与每6小时使用米索前列醇25μg的孕妇相比,不良围产期结局的发生率更高。
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare two labor induction regimens (4 and 6 h), to determine predictors of successful labor induction with intravaginal misoprostol 25 μg tablets, and to evaluate the association with adverse perinatal outcomes.
    METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study that included singleton pregnancies undergoing induction of labor with an intravaginal misoprostol 25 μg tablet between 37 and 42 weeks of gestation. The pregnant women were divided into two groups: Group 1-intravaginal misoprostol 25 μg every 4 h and Group 2-intravaginal misoprostol 25 μg every 6 h.
    RESULTS: Pregnant women were divided into Group 1 (n=289) and Group 2 (n=278). Group 1 had a higher median number of intravaginal misoprostol 25 μg tablets (3.0 vs. 2.0 tablets, p<0.001), a lower prevalence of postpartum hemorrhage (7.6 vs. 32.7%, p<0.001), and a higher need for oxytocin (odds ratio [OR]: 2.1, 95%CI: 1.47-2.98, p<0.001) than Group 2. Models including intravaginal misoprostol 25 μg tablets every 4 and 6 h [x2(1)=23.7, OR: 4.35, p<0.0001], parity [x2(3)=39.4, OR: 0.59, p=0.031], and Bishop\'s score [x2(4)=10.8, OR: 0.77, p=0.019] were the best predictors of failure of labor induction. A statistically significant difference between groups was observed between the use of the first intravaginal misoprostol 25 μg tablet at the beginning (Breslow p<0.001) and the end of the active labor phase (Long Hank p=0.002).
    CONCLUSIONS: Pregnant women who used intravaginal misoprostol 25 μg every 4 h had a longer time from the labor induction to the beginning of the active phase of labor and higher rates of adverse perinatal outcomes than women who used intravaginal misoprostol 25 μg every 6 h.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在一些低收入和中低收入国家发现了催产素增加劳动力的高比率,造成潜在的围产期危害。了解这种过度使用的原因至关重要。目的是探索在达累斯萨拉姆的高容量劳动力病房中使用催产素来增加劳动力的影响因素,坦桑尼亚。
    方法:从2021年3月至2022年2月进行了混合方法数据收集,包括234例新生儿的结构化观察,220小时的非结构化劳动病房观察和对接生员的13次个人深入访谈。采用专题网络分析和描述性统计进行数据分析。我们使用时间镜头来了解催产素在有时间压力的劳动病房中增加分娩的做法。
    结果:接生人员必须经常优先考虑某些护理措施,以应对时间压力。这导致过度使用催产素来增强,以确保更快的分娩进展和缓解经常负担过重,沃德。同时,助产士几乎没有时间监测胎儿和产妇状况。令人惊讶的是,虽然在234个(62.4%)结构化劳动观察中,有146个使用了催产素,只有9/234(4.2%)妇女的积极劳动持续时间超过12小时。相应地,21/48(43.8%)在分娩的第一阶段增加催产素的妇女在开始增加时的分娩进展并不复杂。虽然Partograph通常不用于决策,开始催产素的时间通常与病房和轮班的自然周期相关,而不是与个别妇女的分娩进展相关。这导致了“过早”和“过晚”使用催产素的共存。对长期分娩的潜在恐惧和与催产素相关的风险的警觉性低,促进了催产素用于增加分娩的自由使用。
    结论:产房的时间短缺常常使助产士偏离催产素增加产程的临床指南。克服时间压力的努力导致太多的分娩进展不复杂的妇女接受催产素,而对分娩的监测很少。对长期分娩的恐惧和对催产素介导的风险的低警觉性是关键的驱动因素。这些发现要求对低资源环境中催产素的安全性和益处进行研究,并采取干预措施来解决劳动力病房的拥堵问题,以防止使用催产素作为时间管理工具。
    BACKGROUND: High rates of labour augmentation with oxytocin have been found in some low- and lower-middle-income countries, causing potential perinatal harm. It is critical to understand the reasons for this overuse. Aim was to explore factors that shape practices around using oxytocin for labour augmentation in a high-volume labour ward in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
    METHODS: Mixed-methods data collection was conducted from March 2021 to February 2022, including structured observations of 234 births, 220 h of unstructured labour ward observations and 13 individual in-depth interviews with birth attendants. Thematic network analysis and descriptive statistics were used to analyse data. We used a time-lens to understand practices of oxytocin for labour augmentation in time-pressured labour wards.
    RESULTS: Birth attendants constantly had to prioritise certain care practices over others in response to time pressure. This led to overuse of oxytocin for augmentation to ensure faster labour progression and decongestion of the, often overburdened, ward. Simultaneously, birth attendants had little time to monitor foetal and maternal condition. Surprisingly, while oxytocin was used in 146 out of 234 (62.4%) structured labour observations, only 9/234 (4.2%) women had active labour lasting more than 12 h. Correspondingly, 21/48 (43.8%) women who were augmented with oxytocin in the first stage of labour had uncomplicated labour progression at the start of augmentation. While the partograph was often not used for decision-making, timing of starting oxytocin often correlated with natural cycles of ward-rounds and shift-turnovers instead of individual women\'s labour progression. This resulted in co-existence of \'too early\' and \'too late\' use of oxytocin. Liberal use of oxytocin for labour augmentation was facilitated by an underlying fear of prolonged labour and low alertness of oxytocin-related risks.
    CONCLUSIONS: Time scarcity in the labour ward often made birth attendants deviate from clinical guidelines for labour augmentation with oxytocin. Efforts to navigate time pressure resulted in too many women with uncomplicated labour progression receiving oxytocin with little monitoring of labour. Fear of prolonged labour and low alertness to oxytocin-mediated risks were crucial drivers. These findings call for research into safety and benefits of oxytocin in low-resource settings and interventions to address congestion in labour wards to prevent using oxytocin as a time-management tool.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    比较催产素和宫内球囊同时和序贯给药在引产中的疗效。
    Cochrane图书馆的数据库,WebofScience,PubMed,ClinicalTrials.gov,和Embase从成立之初到2023年11月都进行了彻底搜索。包括研究同时和序贯使用催产素和宫内球囊进行妊娠引产的随机对照试验(RCT)。采用RevMan5.3统计软件进行Meta分析。使用I2统计量评估所选研究之间的异质性。使用相对风险(RR)和相应的95%置信区间(CI)来估计二分结果。而连续结局以平均差(MD)衡量。
    共8项研究,共有1315名未产和多胎妇女子宫颈不好,包括在系统审查中。此外,进行了亚组分析,分别评估未产和多产妇女。与序贯组相比,同时使用催产素和宫内球囊可显著提高未产妇24h内的分娩率(RR=1.30,95CI:1.04,1.63,p=0.02),多段产妇24h内阴道分娩率较高(RR=1.32,95CI:1.15,1.51,p<0.00001),12小时内的分娩率较高,无产妇和多产妇的分娩时间较短。序贯组和同步组之间在剖宫产和产妇和新生儿不良结局方面无统计学差异。
    这些发现为未分娩妇女在引产期间同时使用宫内球囊和催产素提供了支持。此外,这种方法也可能被证明对多人有益。
    UNASSIGNED: To compare the efficacy of simultaneous and sequential administration of oxytocin and intrauterine balloons in labor induction.
    UNASSIGNED: The databases of Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Embase were thoroughly searched from their inception to November 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the simultaneous and sequential use of oxytocin and intrauterine balloons for labor induction in pregnancy were included. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 statistical software. Heterogeneity among the selected studies was evaluated using the I2 statistic. Dichotomous outcomes were estimated using relative risk (RR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI), while continuous outcomes were measured as the mean difference (MD).
    UNASSIGNED: A total of eight studies, involving a total of 1,315 nulliparous and multiparous women with an unfavorable cervix, were included in the systematic review. Moreover, a subgroup analysis was conducted, separately evaluating nulliparous and multiparous women. Compared with the sequential groups, simultaneous use of oxytocin and intrauterine balloons resulted in a significantly higher rate of delivery within 24h in nulliparas (RR = 1.30, 95%CI:1.04, 1.63, p = 0.02), a higher rate of vaginal delivery within 24h in multiparas (RR = 1.32, 95%CI:1.15,1.51, p < 0.00001), a superior rate of delivery within 12h and a shorter time to delivery in both nulliparas and multiparas. No statistically significant differences were observed in cesarean delivery and maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes between the sequential and simultaneous groups.
    UNASSIGNED: These findings provide support for the simultaneous use of intrauterine balloons and oxytocin during labor induction in nulliparous women. Additionally, this approach may also prove beneficial for multiparas.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:草药和/或其产品的使用在全世界都很普遍。在塔马利大都会,孕妇经常使用局部催产素引产,事实表明,90%的助产士报告管理使用kaligutim(当地催产素)加速分娩的患者。早期职业助产士也意识到这一点,并亲自观察到他们的客户正在使用它。该研究的目的是评估助产士对孕妇使用著名的kaligutim(当地催产素)在Tamale大都会引产的看法。
    方法:基于设施的,定量,本研究采用横断面研究设计。Tamale的三家主要公立医院共有214名在职助产士参加。通过标准化问卷收集研究数据。为了分析和呈现数据,描述性和分析性统计,例如基本频率,百分比,费希尔的精确检验,卡方检验和多变量分析,被雇用。
    结果:根据本研究的结果,安全,剂量,和kaligutim禁忌症在怀孕和分娩是未知的。44(22.4%)的客户使用当地催产素的受访者报告了宫缩停止。该研究还显示,塔马利大都市的女性使用“华尔谷”,催产素的一种精神形式,诱导和增加劳动。回答的受访者,“是”,新生儿护理部门的婴儿入院使用kaligutim(当地催产素)的可能性比那些做出反应的人高25%,新生儿监护病房的婴儿入院“否”(AOR=0.2595%CI(0.01,0.53),P=0.021)。
    结论:可以得出结论,使用kaligutim开始分娩对母亲和胎儿都有负面影响。需要额外的研究来评估疗效,有效性,生化化妆,以及这些草药的安全性,特别是在怀孕和分娩期间,以及kaligutim(Walgu)及其形式的精神意义。
    BACKGROUND: The use of herbal medicine and/or its products is common throughout the world. In Tamale Metropolis, pregnant women frequently use local oxytocin to induce labour, as shown by the fact that 90% of midwives reported managing patients who used kaligutim (local oxytocin) to speed up labour. Early career midwives are also aware of this and have personally observed it being used by their clients. The purpose of the study was to assess midwives\' opinions on pregnant women\'s use of the well-known kaligutim (local oxytocin) for labour induction in the Tamale Metropolis.
    METHODS: A facility-based, quantitative, cross-sectional research design was used for the study. A total of 214 working midwives from Tamale\'s three main public hospitals participated. Data for the study were gathered through a standardized questionnaire. For the analysis and presentation of the data, descriptive and analytical statistics, such as basic frequencies, percentages, Fisher\'s exact test, chi square test and multivariate analysis, were employed.
    RESULTS: According to the findings of this study, the safety, dosages, and contraindications of kaligutim during pregnancy and labour are unknown. The cessation of contractions was reported by 44 (22.4%) of the respondents whose clients used local oxytocin. The study also revealed that women in Tamale metropolis use \"walgu\", a spiritual form of oxytocin, to induce and augment labour. Respondents who responded, \"yes\" to baby admission to the new-born care unit were 25% more likely to use kaligutim (local oxytocin) than were those who responded, \"no\" to baby admission to the new-born care unit (AOR = 0.25 95% CI (0.01, 0.53), P = 0.021).
    CONCLUSIONS: It can be concluded that using kaligutim to start labour has negative effects on both the mother and the foetus. Additional research is required to evaluate the efficacy, effectiveness, biochemical makeup, and safety of these herbal medicines, particularly during pregnancy and delivery, as well as the spiritual significance of kaligutim (Walgu) and its forms.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本回顾性研究的目的是检查米索前列醇引产的有效性和安全性,阴道或口服给药。
    方法:这项回顾性队列研究包括2014年1月至2019年1月在科隆大学医院妇产科接受米索前列醇作为阴道插入物或片剂(口服)引产的孕龄≥36+0周和单胎妊娠的孕妇。这项研究的目的是分析分娩前的时间以及母婴结局。
    结果:本回顾性分析共纳入1,511例患者,其中1,035例(68.5%)患者接受米索前列醇阴道插入物(MVI)引产,476例(31.5%)患者接受片剂(口服米索前列醇:OM)引产。与OM相比,MVI显着缩短了从应用到交付的时间(p<0.001),减少了硬膜外麻醉(EA)的需要(p=0.018),而不增加剖腹产(CS)(p=1),ventouse交付(VD)(p=0.715),产妇分娩损伤或新生儿结局降低(APGAR评分,脐带pH值)。
    结论:MVI在效率方面优于OM(主要结果:从应用到分娩的时间),并且同样安全(主要结果:CS率)。我们的研究,连同现有的文献,强调需要进一步研究,尤其是新生儿结局。此外,它强调了在诱导分娩和确保知情同意时仔细考虑的重要性。
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present retrospective study was to examine the efficiency and safety of the induction of labor with Misoprostol, administered either vaginally or orally.
    METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included pregnant women with a gestational age of ≥36 +0 weeks and a singleton pregnancy who underwent induction of labor with Misoprostol as vaginal insert or as tablet (oral) between January 2014 and January 2019 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the University Hospital of Cologne. The objective of this study was to analyze the time until delivery and the maternal and neonatal outcomes.
    RESULTS: A total of 1,511 patients were included in this retrospective analysis, of whom 1,035 patients (68.5%) underwent induction of labor with a misoprostol vaginal insert (MVI) and 476 (31.5%) with tablets (oral misoprostol: OM). MVI significantly shortened the time from application to delivery (p<0.001) in comparison to OM, reduced the need for epidural anesthesia (EA) (p=0.018) without an increase in caesarean sections (CS) (p=1), ventouse deliveries (VD) (p=0.715), maternal birth injuries or a reduced neonatal outcome (APGAR-Score, umbilical cord pH).
    CONCLUSIONS: MVI is superior to OM in terms of efficiency (primary outcome: time from application to delivery) and is equally safe (primary outcome: CS rate). Our study, along with existing literature, highlights the need for further research, particularly regarding neonatal outcomes. Additionally, it underscores the importance of careful consideration when inducing labor and ensuring informed consent.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在探讨生化汤对宫缩乏力(UA)产后出血(PPH)的预防作用。对84例患者的记录进行回顾性分析,42个分配给治疗组,42个分配给对照组。两组都接受卡贝缩宫素,治疗组患者还接受了SHD。主要终点包括失血和血红蛋白水平的变化。次要终点包括需要子宫按摩的患者数量,额外的oxytocic药物,脉搏率,呼吸频率,收缩压,和治疗相关的不良事件。治疗组患者在失血方面表现出优越的预后(P<0.01),血红蛋白水平(P=0.03),与对照组相比,脉搏率(P<0.01)。然而,需要子宫按摩的患者数量无显著差异(P=.13),需要额外催产药物的患者人数(P=.19),呼吸频率(P=0.05),两组之间的收缩压(P=0.80)。两组间治疗相关不良事件无显著差异。这项研究的结果表明,SHD联合卡贝缩宫素预防产后出血的效果优于单独的卡贝缩宫素。然而,需要高质量的前瞻性研究来验证和确认这些结果.
    This retrospective study aimed to investigate the preventive effects of Shenghua decoction (SHD) for postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) attributed to uterine atony (UA). Records of 84 patients were retrospectively analyzed, with 42 assigned to the treatment group and 42 to the control group. Both groups received carbetocin, and patients in the treatment group additionally underwent SHD. Primary endpoints included blood loss and changes in hemoglobin levels. Secondary endpoints encompassed the number of patients requiring uterine massage, additional oxytocic drugs, pulse rate, respiratory rate, systolic blood pressure, and treatment-related adverse events. Patients in the treatment group exhibited superior outcomes in terms of blood loss (P < .01), hemoglobin levels (P = .03), and pulse rate (P < .01) compared to those in the control group. However, no significant differences were observed in the number of patients requiring uterine massage (P = .13), the number of patients needing additional oxytocic drugs (P = .19), respiratory rate (P = .05), and systolic blood pressure (P = .80) between the 2 groups. There were no significant disparities in treatment-related adverse events between the 2 groups. The findings of this study suggest that the preventive effects of SHD combined with carbetocin were superior to those of carbetocin alone for preventing postpartum hemorrhage. However, high-quality prospective studies are needed to validate and confirm these results.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:大多数指南建议在足月(妊娠37周或更长时间)产前胎膜破裂(PROM)后24小时内引产。然而,在24小时内开始诱导的确切时间仍然未知。这项研究旨在比较评估6小时内与6-24小时内使用阴道地诺前列酮治疗单胎妊娠伴PROM和不利宫颈(Bishop评分<6)的疗效和安全性。
    方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,包括单胎妊娠伴胎膜早破和宫颈不良(Bishop评分<6),其中使用阴道地诺前列酮引产。根据使用诱导的时间将妇女分为两组(在PROM后6小时内和6-24小时内)。基线孕产妇数据,对母婴结局进行统计分析.
    结果:包括450名妇女,其中146例(32.4%)在PROM的6小时内诱发,304例(67.6%)在6-24小时内诱发。剖宫产率(15.8%对29.3%,p=0.002)和令人不放心的胎儿心率追踪(4.8%对10.5%,p=0.043)在6h内使用阴道地诺前列酮组明显低于在6-24h内使用阴道地诺前列酮组。从IOL到阴道分娩的持续时间没有显着差异。
    结论:对于宫颈不良的单胎妊娠(Bishop评分<6),在PROM后6小时内使用阴道地诺前列酮进行引产,与剖宫产次数减少显着相关,不那么令人放心的胎儿心率追踪,与PROM后6-24小时内引产相比。
    BACKGROUND: Most guidelines propose inducing labor within 24 h following term (37 or more weeks of gestation) prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM). However, the exact timing for initiating induction within the 24 h period remains unknown. This study aims to comparatively assess the efficacy and safety of the use of vaginal dinoprostone within 6 h versus within 6-24 h for singleton pregnancies with PROM and an unfavorable cervix (Bishop score < 6).
    METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study including singleton pregnancies with PROM and an unfavorable cervix (Bishop score < 6) in which labor was induced using vaginal dinoprostone. Women were divided into two groups according to the timing of the use of induction (within 6 h versus within 6-24 h after PROM). Baseline maternal data, maternal and neonatal outcomes were recorded for statistical analysis.
    RESULTS: 450 women were included, 146 (32.4%) of whom were induced within 6 h of PROM and 304 (67.6%) were induced within 6-24 h. Cesarean delivery rate (15.8% versus 29.3%, p = 0.002) and nonreassuring fetal heart rate tracing (4.8% versus 10.5%, p = 0.043) in group with vaginal dinoprostone within 6 h were significantly lower than those in group with vaginal dinoprostone within 6-24 h. There was no significant differences in terms of duration from IOL to vaginal delivery.
    CONCLUSIONS: Induction of labor within 6 h with vaginal dinoprostone after PROM for singleton pregnancies with an unfavorable cervix (Bishop score < 6) significantly associated with less cesarean section, less nonreassuring fetal heart rate tracing, compared to induction of labor within 6-24 h after PROM.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究检查了拉下子宫颈并将其填入阴道穹窿(PC-PVF)对子宫下段产后出血(PPH-LUS)的疗效。
    对2019年1月至2022年12月在两家三级医院阴道分娩后的所有PPH-LUS病例进行回顾性调查。保守治疗成功的患者仅分为常规治疗(40例),常规治疗+早期PC-PVF(33例),常规治疗+晚期PC-PVF(51例)组。常规治疗包括子宫按摩,子宫内膜,和氨甲环酸给药。通过比较分娩后24h内的出血量和出血率来评估治疗效果。
    总共124例患者接受了保守治疗,除了3例因子宫下段不完全破裂而在PC-PVF失败后进行剖腹止血的患者。仅常规治疗的疗效为44%(40/91),与PC-PVF联合用于PPH-LUS的疗效为100%。产妇年龄差异无统计学意义,孕周,新生儿体重,和阿普加得分。但常规治疗+早期PC-PVF组的总失血量(657.27ml±131.61ml)明显低于其他两组,分别为847.13ml±250.37ml(p<0.01)和1040.78ml±242.70ml(p<0.01),分别。常规治疗+早期PC-PVF组填塞后出血率明显下降。
    PC-PVF是PPH-LUS的安全有效治疗方法。早期识别PPH-LUS并及时应用PC-PVF可有效减少阴道分娩后的失血量。
    产后出血严重威胁孕产妇安全,仍是孕产妇死亡的主要原因。目前,阴道分娩后缺乏对PPH-LUS的早期识别和有针对性的保守治疗.仍然非常需要治疗PPH-LUS的创新,因为,根据目前可用的管理策略,结果仍然不一致,增加并发症的风险,基层医院的准入有限。根据临床数据统计和比较,事实证明,PC-PVF是一种简单的,快速,本研究采用非侵入性方法治疗阴道分娩后的PPH-LUS。由于其简单的技术要求,易于获取的材料,成本低,PC-PVF适用于各级医院。
    UNASSIGNED: This study examined the efficacy of pulling down the cervix and packing it in the vaginal fornix (PC-PVF) on postpartum hemorrhage in the lower uterine segment (PPH-LUS).
    UNASSIGNED: All cases of PPH-LUS after vaginal delivery at two tertiary hospitals between January 2019 and December 2022 were retrospectively investigated. Patients treated successfully with conservative measures were divided into routine treatment only (40 patients), routine treatment + early PC-PVF (33 patients), and routine treatment + late PC-PVF (51 patients) groups. Routine treatment consisted of uterine massage, uterotonics, and tranexamic acid administration. The therapeutic effect was evaluated by comparing the volume and rate of bleeding within 24 h after delivery.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 124 patients were treated conservatively, except for three patients who underwent laparotomy for hemostasis after PC-PVF failed for incomplete rupture of the lower uterine segment. The efficacy of treatment was 44% (40/91) for routine treatment only and 100% when combined with PC-PVF for PPH-LUS. There was no significant difference in maternal age, gestational week, neonatal weight, and Apgar score. But the total blood loss in the conventional treatment + early PC-PVF group (657.27 ml ± 131.61 ml) was significantly lower than that in the other two groups, which was 847.13 ml ± 250.37 ml(p < .01) and 1040.78 ml ± 242.70 ml (p < .01), respectively. The bleeding rate in the routine treatment + early PC-PVF group decreased significantly after tamponade.
    UNASSIGNED: PC-PVF is a safe and effective treatment for PPH-LUS. Early identification of PPH-LUS and prompt application of PC-PVF can effectively reduce blood loss after vaginal delivery.
    Postpartum hemorrhage is a serious threat to maternal safety and remains to be the leading cause of maternal death. At present, there is a lack of early identification and targeted conservative treatment of PPH-LUS after vaginal delivery. Innovations for the treatment of PPH-LUS are still greatly needed because, with currently available management strategies, there is still inconsistency in outcomes, increased risk of complications, and limited access in primary hospitals. Based on clinical data statistics and comparison, it is proved that PC-PVF is a simple, rapid, and noninvasive method for the treatment of PPH-LUS after vaginal delivery in this study. Because of its simple technical requirements, easily accessible materials, and low cost, PC-PVF is suitable for hospitals at all levels.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    瑞典国家数据显示,在产科单位之间使用催产素来增加自发分娩的情况存在很大差异。这项研究旨在调查催产素增强的使用差异是否与母婴特征或临床因素有关。我们使用了队列设计,包括分配到Robson组1的女性(未分娩女性,孕周≥37+0,头部单胎分娩和自发分娩)和3(产妇,孕周≥37+0,头端单胎分娩,自发分娩,并且以前没有剖腹产)。使用具有边际标准化的粗逻辑回归模型和调整逻辑回归模型,以95%置信区间(CI)估计产科单位使用催产素的风险比(RR)和风险差异(RD)。进行了相互作用分析以研究硬膜外的潜在修饰作用。催产素的使用在Robson组1中在47%和73%之间变化,在Robson组3中在10%和33%之间变化。与瑞典其余地区相比,在Robson组1中,催产素增加的风险从低13%(RD-13.0,95%CI-15.5~10.6)到高14%(RD14.0,95%CI12.3~15.8),在Robson组3中从低6%(RD-5.6,95%CI-6.8~4.5)到高18%(RD17.9,95%CI16.5~19.4).在Robson3组硬膜外麻醉的女性中观察到了风险估计的最显著差异。总之,尽管对危险因素进行了调整,但催产素使用的差异仍然存在.这表明在临床实践中使用催产素存在不合理的差异。
    National Swedish data shows substantial variation in the use of oxytocin for augmentation of spontaneous labour between obstetric units. This study aimed to investigate if variations in the use of oxytocin augmentation are associated with maternal and infant characteristics or clinical factors. We used a cohort design including women allocated to Robson group 1 (nulliparous women, gestational week ≥ 37 + 0, with singleton births in cephalic presentation and spontaneous onset of labour) and 3 (parous women, gestational week ≥ 37 + 0, with singleton births in cephalic presentation, spontaneous onset of labour, and no previous caesarean birth). Crude and adjusted logistic regression models with marginal standardisation were used to estimate risk ratios (RR) and risk differences (RD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for oxytocin use by obstetric unit. An interaction analysis was performed to investigate the potential modifying effect of epidural. The use of oxytocin varied between 47 and 73% in Robson group 1, and 10% and 33% in Robson group 3. Compared to the remainder of Sweden, the risk of oxytocin augmentation ranged from 13% lower (RD - 13.0, 95% CI - 15.5 to - 10.6) to 14% higher (RD 14.0, 95% CI 12.3-15.8) in Robson group 1, and from 6% lower (RD - 5.6, 95% CI - 6.8 to - 4.5) to 18% higher (RD 17.9, 95% CI 16.5-19.4) in Robson group 3. The most notable differences in risk estimates were observed among women in Robson group 3 with epidural. In conclusion, variations in oxytocin use remained despite adjusting for risk factors. This indicates unjustified differences in use of oxytocin in clinical practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号