OBJECTIVE: To test the impact of professional management of soft contact lens wear on symptoms and ocular complications.
METHODS: Subjective symptoms and ocular complications of soft CL users who did not seek professional follow-up care (self-managed, SM), were compared to users who were prescribed CLs and their care professionally managed in optometry practices (PM), and to a control group of non-CL wearers. Habitual visual acuity, subjective dry-eye symptoms, and corneal abnormalities were assessed in all participants. CL wearers filled-out a usage habits questionnaire, and their CL fit was assessed. Outcomes were compared using Kruskal-Wallis and Chi Squared tests.
RESULTS: The SM, PM, and non-CL wearers cohorts included 127 (mean age:24.3±5.1, median:23, range:16-45 years,104 female), 132 (mean age:25.5±6.2, median:23, range:18-43 years,103 female), and 56 (mean age:22.3±3.5, median:21, range:18-39 years,36 female) participants, respectively. Meibomian gland dysfunction grade (p = 0.004, p<0.0001), limbal redness (both p = 0.04), corneal neovascularization (both p = 0.003), and papillary conjunctivitis (p<0.0001,p = 0.005) were significantly worse in SM CL wearers compared with both the non-CL wearers and PM CL wearers, respectively. Conjunctival staining was significantly worse in the SM cohort compared with the PM cohort (p = 0.01). 38.6% of the SM compared with 22.8% of the PM CL wearers, had an inappropriate refractive correction (p = 0.006). SM CL wearers wore CLs significantly more years (mean and median 1 year,p = 0.008), for more daily hours (mean and median of 2 hours,p<0.00001), and tended to nap or sleep with their CLs compared with the PM CL wearers (47 vs. 29,p = 0.02). The cohorts did not differ in their subjective symptoms.
CONCLUSIONS: Complications are significantly more prevalent in SM CL wearers compared with PM CL wearers, and SM CL wearers tend to wear CLs with incorrect powers, and are less compliant with napping or sleeping with the CLs compared with PM CL wearers. These findings emphasize the importance of fitting, patient education and follow-ups in CL wearers.

BACKGROUND: Contact lens discomfort is a symptom-based clinical diagnosis that affects 13% to 75% of contact lens wearers. The Tear Film and Ocular Surface Society defines contact lens discomfort as \"a condition characterized by episodic or persistent adverse ocular sensations related to lens wear either with or without visual disturbance, resulting from reduced compatibility between the lens and ocular environment, which can lead to decreased wearing time and discontinuation from lens wear.\" Signs of the condition include conjunctival hyperemia, corneal and conjunctival staining, altered blinking patterns, lid wiper epitheliopathy, and meibomian gland dysfunction. Eye care specialists often treat contact lens discomfort with lubricating drops, including saline, although there is no clear evidence showing this treatment is effective and safe.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of lubricating drops for ocular discomfort associated with contact lens wear in adults.
METHODS: We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register), MEDLINE, Embase.com, two other databases, and two trials registries to May 2024, without date or language restrictions.
METHODS: We included parallel-group randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated lubricating drops, including saline, versus no treatment, or that evaluated lubricating drops versus saline, in adult contact lens wearers. We included studies regardless of publication status, language, or year of publication.
METHODS: We applied standard Cochrane methodology. The critical outcome was contact lens discomfort. Important outcomes were corneal fluorescein staining and conjunctival redness. Adverse outcomes were incident microbial keratitis, inflammatory corneal infiltrates, and participant discontinuation. We assessed risk of bias for outcomes reported in the summary of findings table using the Cochrane risk of bias tool RoB 2, and we rated the certainty of the evidence using GRADE.
RESULTS: We included seven RCTs conducted in the USA, Canada, Italy, and France. They randomized a total of 463 participants to lubricating drops, saline, or no treatment. Four trials evaluated lubricating drops and saline versus no treatment, but one of them provided no usable outcome data. Three trials evaluated lubricating drops versus saline. Study characteristics All trial participants were adults, and the mean age ranged from 25.7 years to 36.7 years. The proportion of women varied from 15% to 82%. The trials lasted between one and four weeks. Of the five trials that reported contact lens discomfort, we judged three at high risk of bias, and considered the other two had some risk of bias concerns. Lubricating drops (including saline) versus no treatment Lubricating drops compared with no treatment may reduce contact lens discomfort, measured on a 37-point scale (lower is better), but the evidence is very uncertain (mean difference [MD] -5.9 points, 95% confidence interval [CI] -3.74 to -8.05; 2 RCTs; 119 participants). One trial found no difference between lubricating drops and no treatment in \"end-of-day\" comfort. The trial that compared saline with no treatment provided no results for the control group. Two studies measured corneal fluorescein staining on a scale of 0 to 20 (lower is better). We found low-certainty evidence of little to no difference between lubricating drops and no treatment in changes in the extent (MD -0.15 points, 95% CI -0.86 to 0.56; 2 RCTs; 119 participants), depth (MD -0.01 points, 95% CI -0.44 to 0.42; 2 RCTs; 119 participants), or type (MD 0.04 points, 95% CI -0.38 to 0.46; 2 RCTs; 119 participants) of corneal fluorescein staining scores. Regarding conjunctival redness, measured on a scale of 0 to 4 (lower is better), there was low-certainty evidence of little to no difference between lubricating drops and no treatment in nasal region scores (MD 0.10, 95% CI -0.29 to 0.49; 1 RCT; 73 participants) and temporal region scores (MD 0.00, 95% CI -0.39 to 0.39; 1 RCT; 73 participants). No studies reported microbial keratitis or inflammatory corneal infiltrates, and no trials reported vision-threatening adverse events up to four weeks of treatment. All trials reported the proportion of participants who discontinued participation. In two trials, no participants left any treatment group. Our meta-analysis of another two studies suggests little difference in the number of people who dropped out of the lubricating treatment group versus the no treatment group (risk ratio [RR] 1.42, 95% CI 0.19 to 10.94; 138 participants; low-certainty evidence). Lubricating drops versus saline Lubricating drops may have little to no effect compared with saline on contact lens discomfort measured on a visual analog scale of 0 to 100 (lower is better), but the evidence is very uncertain (MD 9.5 points, 95% CI -4.65 to 23.65; 1 RCT; 39 participants). No studies reported corneal fluorescein staining or conjunctival redness. No studies reported microbial keratitis or inflammatory corneal infiltrates, and no trials reported vision-threatening adverse events up to four weeks of treatment. Our meta-analysis of three studies suggests little difference in the number of people who dropped out of the lubricating treatment group versus the saline group (RR 1.56, 95% CI 0.47 to 5.12; 269 participants; low-certainty evidence).
CONCLUSIONS: Very low-certainty evidence suggests that lubricating drops may improve contact lens discomfort compared with no treatment, but may have little or no effect on contact lens discomfort compared with saline. Low-certainty evidence also suggests that lubricating drops may have no unwanted effects that would lead to discontinuation over one to four weeks. Current evidence suggests that prescribing lubricating drops (including saline) to people with contact lens discomfort is a viable option. However, most studies did not assess patient-reported contact lens (dis)comfort using a validated instrument. Therefore, further well-designed trials are needed to generate high-certainty evidence on patient-reported outcomes as well as on longer-term safety outcomes.

UNASSIGNED: An investigation into whether Thunder-Fire Moxibustion improves Meibomian Gland Dysfunction by activating peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ)-related signaling pathway.
UNASSIGNED: C57BL/6 mice were randomly divided into a Control Group (CG), model group (MG), Experimental Group (EG), Treatment Group (TG), and GW9662 (GW), with 10 mice in each group. The obstruction of the meibomian gland opening, tear film rupture time, and corneal fluorescein sodium staining were observed. The morphology of the meibomian gland was observed by HE staining. Observations of oil red staining were made on the meibomian gland to determine its oil content. The expression levels of PPARγ, NF-κB p65, Phospho-NF-κB p65 (p-NF-κB), and IL-6 in the meibomian gland were detected by Western blot. The expression of PPARγ, NF-κB p65, p-NF-κB p65, and IL-6 in the meibomian gland was examined by immunofluorescence staining.
UNASSIGNED: The results showed that compared to the Control Group, the Model Group mice exhibited an increased Meibomian Gland Orifices Score (MGOS) (P < .01), an increased MG corneal staining (P < .01), a shorter tear film break-up time (P < .01), eyelid atrophy, disordered arrangement of meibomian gland cells, the presence of a large number of immature adipocytes, varying degrees of cellular inflammation and infiltration, a significant reduction in meibomian gland tissue lipids, decreased expressions of MGPPARγ and NF-κB (P < .01), and elevated expressions of phosphorylated NF-κB and IL-6 (P < .01). However, Western medicine, antagonists, and thunder-fire moxibustion were all able to reverse these phenomena observed in the Model Group mice (P < .01), with thunder-fire moxibustion exhibiting the most significant effect (P < .01).
UNASSIGNED: The thunder-fire moxibustion can induce the differentiation of meibomian gland cells, thereby improving the inflammation response.

BACKGROUND: Sebaceous adenitis (SA) is an immune-mediated disease targeting the sebaceous glands. Meibomian gland dysfunction is a disease affecting meibomian glands with inflammatory features. Sebaceous and meibomian glands share anatomical, physiological and embryological similarities. The involvement of meibomian glands in dogs with SA is currently unknown.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate meibomian glands in dogs affected by SA and compare them with healthy dogs.
METHODS: Eighteen dogs were enrolled. Nine dogs with SA were retrospectively identified from clinical records and represented the case group. Nine healthy, breed- and age-matched dogs were prospectively enrolled in the control group.
METHODS: Both groups underwent dermatological examination, Schirmer tear test-1 (STT-1), tear meniscus height (TMH), slit-lamp biomicroscopy, interferometry (INT) and noncontact infrared meibography (NIM).
RESULTS: One third of SA dogs presented subepithelial crystalline opacities. No significant difference between groups was observed in TMH (p = 0.944) and STT-1 values (p = 0.066). INT (p = 0.016) and NIM grades (p = 0.010) were significantly higher and lower in the SA group compared to the control group, respectively. INT values decreased with age (η = 0.930), while NIM scores (η = 0.935) increased.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinical Relevance: Subepithelial crystalline opacities in SA dogs might reflect a reduced tear film quality. In the absence of standardised methods, INT and NIM proved to be noninvasive and useful methods to examine meibomian glands. Dogs with SA showed a thinner lacrimal lipid layer and more severe meibomian gland abnormalities than control dogs, which seemed to progress with age.

Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is the primary cause of evaporative dry eye disease (DED), which negatively affects the physical and mental quality of life of patients. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing perfluorohexyloctane to placebo for MGD in order to identify the best course of treatment for DED in these patients. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline recommendations and prospectively registered the study in PROSPERO (CRD42023442172). The PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases were searched for RCTs comparing perfluorohexyloctane to placebo on patients with DED associated with MGD. The statistical analysis was carried out using the \"R\" software. The mean difference (MD) with 95% CIs was computed using a random-effects model, and p < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant. The study included 1,814 patients from four RCTs, of whom 972 (53.5%) received perfluorohexyloctane. Patients treated with perfluorohexyloctane had significantly lower total corneal fluorescein staining (tCFS) score (MD -1.09; 95% CI -1.37 to -0.82; p < 0.001; I2 = 0%), eye distress Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (MD -9.69; 95% CI -12.01 to -7.36; p < 0.01; I2 = 0%), Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) (MD -5.79; 95% CI -8.22 to -3.36 p < 0.01; I2 = 0%), and Eye Burning/Stinging Score (VAS) (MD, -7.16; 95% CI -9.55 to -4.80 p < 0.01; I2 = 0%). The meta-analysis results indicate that perfluorohexyloctane was effective and safe in treating evaporative dry eye, reducing tCFS, eye discomfort, OSDI, and burning sensation, despite the included studies only assessing short-term effects and excluding certain patient groups.

We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of an acupuncture steam-warming eye mask (ASEM) on dry eye disease (DED) in visual display terminal (VDT) users. This prospective randomized clinical trial included VDT users with DED-related features who were randomly assigned to the ASEM group (ASEM for 2 weeks, 20 participants) or the steam-warming eye mask (SEM) group (SEM for 2 weeks, 20 participants). The tear film break-up time (TBUT), Schirmer test, tear meniscus height, ocular surface staining scores, eyelid and meibomian gland exam, subjective symptoms, and quality of life (QoL) scores before and after treatment were collected. A generalized linear mixed model was applied to compare the improvement of symptoms and signs between the two groups. After the 2-week treatment, all the subjective symptoms and questionnaire scores in the ASEM group improved significantly (all p < 0.05), whereas the feelings of relaxation, comfortable, and refreshment did not change in the SEM group (both p > 0.05). The TBUT, tear meniscus height, and meibum quality in the lower eyelid were significantly better in the ASEM group than the SEM group (all p < 0.05), whereas no significant changes were observed in the Schirmer test and ocular surface staining scores. Compared with the SEM group, the ASEM group experienced a stronger feeling of refreshment (p = 0.013), lower sensation of ocular discharge (p = 0.031), higher TBUT (p = 0.045), better meibomian gland expressibility of both eyelids (both p < 0.05), and better meibum quality of both eyelids (both p < 0.05), even after adjustments for age and sex. In conclusion, comparing with SEM, ASEM can improve some subjective DED symptoms, tear film stability, and meibum status in VDT users.

BACKGROUND: Warm compresses are the routine treatment for Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) in daily life, but in order to achieve satisfactory efficacy, the treatment needs to be sustained over a long time, which can have an impact on the patient compliance. A more convenient warm compresses will help improve the patient compliance. Therefore, the purpose of the study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of the disposable eyelid warming masks for treatment of dry eye disease (DED) due to MGD.
METHODS: This was a randomized, controlled, non-masked, two-center clinical trial. One hundred and forty-four patients were treated by the masks or the hot towel twice daily for 12 weeks. Patients were evaluated at baseline, 4-week and 12-week visits for subjective symptoms, objective signs and safety assessments, including ocular symptom scores, ocular surface disease index (OSDI), tear break-up time (BUT), corneal fluorescein staining (CFS), Schirmer I test (SIT), meibum quality, meibum expressibility, and adverse events (AEs).
RESULTS: A totle of 134 patients were followed in the study. The mean age of the masks group (14 males and 52 females) and the hot towel group (20 males and 48 females) was 43.7 ± 13.5 years and 39.5 ± 13.9 years, respectively. At 4-week visit, there were significant statistical differences in ocular symptom scores, OSDI and CFS between two groups (P < 0.05). Except for SIT, the treatment group showed a greater improvement in subjective symptoms and objective signs than the control group at 12-week visit. (P < 0.05). In addition, 40 AEs occurred in 27 patients (37.5%) in the treatment group, and 34 AEs occurred in 21 patients (29.17%) in the control group. No serious AEs were reported.
CONCLUSIONS: The masks had a good efficacy and safety in the treatment of DED due to MGD, and might offer an attractive treatment option for some patients.
BACKGROUND: The study was registered at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR1900025443) on August 26, 2019.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the long-term effects of intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy on patients with dry eye disease (DED) associated with meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD).
METHODS: A retrospective case series was performed with 110 participants undergoing IPL therapy. Assessments included the eye fitness test (EFT) to gauge subjective symptoms, along with objective measures using the Tearcheck® device (ESW Vision, Houdan, France) noninvasive first breakup time (NIFBUT), noninvasive average breakup time (NIABUT), central tear meniscus height (CTMH), thinnest tear meniscus height (TTMH), and ocular surface inflammatory risk evaluation (OSIE) assessed using the SCHWIND SIRIUS device (SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions GmbH, Kleinostheim, Germany).
RESULTS: This study documented significant improvements in subjective and objective symptoms associated with DED and MGD. Subjective symptoms measured by the EFT showed an average increase of 9.74 points (range -10 to 28, standard deviation [SD] ± 7.54), indicating reduced symptoms. Objective measures of tear film stability, represented by NIABUT, increased by an average of 4.04 s (range -15.00 to 14.40, SD ± 4.91). Tear film stability evaluation (TFSE) scores decreased by 229.12 points on average (range -1775 to 528, SD ± 384.94), suggesting enhanced tear film stability. OSIE type 1 showed a reduction in inflammation, with a percentage decrease of 4.98% (range -45 to 5, SD ± 7.33). Additionally, OSIE capture time decreased by 3.25 s on average (range -27 to 22, SD ± 10.35), further indicating an improvement in ocular surface health.
CONCLUSIONS: IPL therapy was shown to be a promising, noninvasive approach for improving quality of life in patients with DED by effectively managing symptoms and stabilizing tear film. The findings support the use of IPL as a sustainable treatment modality for DED associated with MGD.

Purpose: Changes in meibum composition and quantity in meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) result in tear film instability and dry eye. This exploratory study aimed to identify changes in (O-acyl)-ω-hydroxy fatty acid (OAHFA) and hydrocarbon chain (HC) unsaturation levels in meibum related to the presence and severity of MGD. Methods: Meibum samples were collected from 3 cohorts of adults with no MGD, mild-to-moderate MGD, and severe MGD in a noninterventional clinical trial (NCT01979887). OAHFAs, cholesterol esters (CE), HC unsaturation, and HC length in the meibum samples were quantified with 1H-nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy using 2 methods of normalization. Results: Meibum samples from 62 subjects were analyzed: 21 non-MGD, 21 mild-to-moderate MGD, and 20 severe MGD. Meibum OAHFA and CE levels and HC unsaturation were reduced with increasing severity of MGD, with most pairwise comparisons significant (P < 0.05, t-tests), following the order non-MGD > mild-to-moderate MGD > severe MGD. Regardless of the resonances used for normalization, each pairwise comparison of OAHFA, CE, and HC unsaturation levels in MGD (combined severities) versus non-MGD samples was significant (P < 0.01, t-test). Analysis using various normalization equations showed reductions of 20%-22% for OAHFAs, 51%-57% for CE, and 36%-66% for HC unsaturation in MGD (combined severities) compared with non-MGD. HC length was not altered in MGD (combined severities) compared with non-MGD samples (t-test). Conclusions: Meibum OAHFA, CE, and HC unsaturation levels were reduced in MGD and were lowest in the severe MGD cohort. These findings may contribute to the understanding of the pathophysiology of MGD.

BACKGROUND: Low-level light therapy (LLLT) or photobiomodulation, the application of red light to the eye, is used for the treatment of dry eye. Limited studies have investigated the efficacy of LLLT as a stand-alone treatment. The investigation aimed to evaluate the effect of LLLT on signs and symptoms of dry eye.
METHODS: Participants with mild to moderate dry eye were recruited for this three-visit study. Visits were 7 (±3) days apart and all participants received 633 nm LLLT (eye-light®) for 15 min at each visit. Clinical measures including first and average non-invasive keratograph tear break-up time (NIKBUT), tear meniscus height (TMH), meibomian gland (MG) loss for upper and lower eyelids, ocular surface disease index (OSDI) score, tear film lipid layer thickness, meibum quality score, Schirmer\'s test, corneal fluorescein staining and eyelid temperature for external upper (EUL) and external lower (ELL) eyelids were measured from the right eye of participants before and after treatment.
RESULTS: Thirty participants (mean [SD] age: 31.1 [9.5] years) completed the study. Treatment with LLLT resulted in significant differences in first and average NIKBUT, TMH, tear film lipid layer thickness, OSDI score, Schirmer\'s test, meibum quality score and eyelid temperature over time (all p < 0.05). Compared to baseline, TMH, tear film lipid layer thickness and eyelid temperature significantly increased by 0.06 mm (95% CI: 0.01-0.11), 12.9 nm (95% CI: 1.18-24.55), and 7.0°C, respectively, for both EUL (95% CI: 6.17-7.84) and ELL (95% CI: 6.17-7.73). The respective decrease in the OSDI score and Schirmer\'s test was 10.2 (95% CI: -15.15 to -5.26) and 4.4 mm (95% CI: -7.31 to -1.42; all p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in corneal fluorescein staining and MG loss after LLLT.
CONCLUSIONS: Low-level light therapy treatment significantly improved signs and symptoms of dry eye in the early phases of treatment, suggesting its efficacy for dry eye management.