External fixators

外部固定器
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    探讨内外固定联合手术治疗胫骨平台后外侧骨折的疗效及安全性。该研究于2020年2月至2023年2月进行,共纳入77例SchatzkerIV型和SchatzkerV型胫骨平台后外侧骨折患者。根据治疗方法的不同分为对照组和治疗组:对照组38例,采用双托钢板治疗。研究组39例,采用内侧钢板联合外侧锁定钢板内固定治疗。治疗期间的临床指标,术后即刻和术后12个月的影像学指标,Rasmussen膝关节功能评分术前及术后3个月,膝关节功能恢复,生活质量,记录并比较两组患者术后并发症。术中失血量进行组间比较,手术时间,术后开始负重的时间(P>.05)。研究组术后住院时间和骨折愈合时间均短于对照组(P<0.05)。术后立即,两组的内倾角和后倾角比较(P>.05)。术后12个月,与术后即刻值相比,两组的内侧倾角减小,后倾角增加(P<0.05),组间差异无统计学意义(P>.05)。然而,术后3个月,两组各维度的得分与术前相比均增加,研究组评分高于对照组(P<0.05)。然而,术后3个月,两组患者的生活质量评分均高于术前,研究组得分较高(P<0.05)。比较两组患者治疗期间并发症发生情况(P>0.05)。内外侧联合钢板内固定治疗胫骨平台后外侧骨折具有良好的临床效果。可以缩短骨折愈合时间,有助于膝关节功能的恢复,提高患者术后的生活质量,在处理过程中具有较高的安全性。
    To investigate the treatment outcomes of combined internal and external fixation surgery for patients with posterior lateral tibial plateau fractures and explore its safety. The study was conducted from February 2020 to February 2023 and included a total of 77 patients with Schatzker IV and Schatzker V type posterior lateral tibial plateau fractures. Patients were divided into control group and treatment group according to different treatment methods: the control group with 38 cases received treatment with dual-support plates, and the study group with 39 cases received treatment with internal fixation using medial plates combined with lateral locking plates. Clinical indicators during treatment, immediate postoperative and 12-month postoperative radiographic indicators, Rasmussen knee joint function scores before and 3 months after surgery, knee joint function recovery, quality of life, and postoperative complications were recorded and compared between the 2 groups. The inter-group comparisons were made for intraoperative blood loss, surgical duration, and the time to start weight-bearing postoperatively (P > .05). The study group had shorter postoperative hospital stays and fracture healing times compared to the control group (P < .05). Immediately postoperatively, the medial tilt angle and posterior tilt angle in both groups were compared (P > .05). At 12 months postoperatively, the medial tilt angle decreased and the posterior tilt angle increased in both groups compared to immediately postoperative values (P < .05), with no significant difference between the groups (P > .05). However, at 3 months postoperatively, the scores for various dimensions in both groups increased compared to preoperative values, and the study group had higher scores than the control group (P < .05). However, at 3 months postoperatively, the quality of life scores were higher than preoperative values in both groups, with the study group having higher scores (P < .05). The occurrence of complications during the treatment period was compared between the 2 groups (P > .05). The medial and lateral combined plate fixation has a good clinical effect in the treatment of posterolateral tibial plateau fractures, which can shorten the fracture healing time, help the recovery of knee joint function and improve the quality of life of patients after operation, and has high safety in the treatment process.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的目的是评估军事医学科学院采用Ilizarov外圆形固定(ECF)技术治疗胫骨开放性骨折的长期疗效。
    方法:在1992年1月至2011年12月之间,共有134名男性军事人员(平均年龄:22.5岁;范围,回顾性分析18至36年)接受ECF治疗的Gustilo-Anderson3型胫骨开放性骨折。所有患者都接受了多次手术,最终进行了Ilizarov固定手术。使用Ilizarov方法研究和应用协会(ASAMI)标准评估放射学和功能结果,并注意到并发症。
    结果:中位随访时间为17.7(范围,10至29)年。工会的中位数时间为4.7(范围,3至8)个月。所有的镜架都从肢体上取下,当工会被观察到。没有再骨折,肢体长度差异超过2.5厘米,Ilizarov治疗后或膝盖以下截肢在任何患者中可见。40%(n=54)的患者中观察到慢性骨髓炎,中位时间为17至148个月。ASAMI骨总评分在40(30%),在20(15%)公平在20(15%),在54例(40%)骨髓炎患者中表现不佳。ASAMI功能评分优秀40分(30%),在40(30%),和公平的54例患者(40%)。没有观察到不良评分。在63例患者(47%)中观察到较小的针状部位感染。
    结论:我们的长期研究结果表明,所有患者在使用IlizarovECF方法治疗由高能量弹道损伤引起的胫骨开放性骨折后,恢复了社交生活,并且在没有支持的情况下被动员。然而,几年后,在治疗枪支和弹道导弹损伤引起的粉碎性骨折时,必须牢记针道感染和骨髓炎等并发症。
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the longterm outcomes of open tibia fractures treated using the Ilizarov external circular fixation (ECF) technique in the Military Medical Academy.
    METHODS: Between January 1992 and December 2011, a total of 134 male military personnel (median age: 22.5 years; range, 18 to 36 years) with Gustilo-Anderson type 3 open tibia fractures treated with ECF were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent multiple surgeries and eventually Ilizarov fixation surgery. The radiological and functional outcomes were evaluated using the Association for the Study and Application of Methods of Ilizarov (ASAMI) criteria, and complications were noted.
    RESULTS: The median follow-up was 17.7 (range, 10 to 29) years. The median time to union was 4.7 (range, 3 to 8) months. All frames were removed from the limb, when union was observed. No re-fracture, limb length discrepancy more than 2.5 cm, or below-knee amputation after Ilizarov treatment was seen in any patient. Chronic osteomyelitis was observed at in 40% (n=54) of the patients at a median time ranging from 17 to 148 months. The overall ASAMI bone scores were excellent in 40 (30%), good in 20 (15%), fair in 20 (15%), and poor in 54 (40%) patients with osteomyelitis. The ASAMI functional scores were excellent in 40 (30%), good in 40 (30%), and fair in 54 patients (40%). No poor score was observed. Minor pin site infections were observed in 63 patients (47%).
    CONCLUSIONS: Our long-term study results showed that all patients returned to their social life and were mobilized without support after treatment with the use of Ilizarov ECF method of open tibia fractures caused by high-energy ballistic injuries. However, complications such as pin tract infections and osteomyelitis after several years must be kept in mind in the treatment of comminuted bone fractures caused by firearms and ballistic missiles injuries.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    UNASSIGNED: To explore the effectiveness of reduction robot combined with navigation robot-assisted minimally invasive treatment for Tile type B pelvic fractures.
    UNASSIGNED: Between January 2022 and February 2023, 10 patients with Tile type B pelvic fractures were admitted. There were 6 males and 4 females with an average age of 45.5 years (range, 30-71 years). The fractures were caused by traffic accident in 5 cases, bruising by heavy object in 3 cases, and falling from height in 2 cases. The interval between injury and operation ranged from 4-13 days (mean, 6.8 days). There were 2 cases of Tile type B1 fractures, 1 case of Tile type B2 fracture, and 7 cases of Tile type B3 fractures. After closed reduction under assistance of reduction robot, the anterior ring was fixed with percutaneous screws with or without internal fixator, and the posterior ring was fixed with sacroiliac joint screws under assistance of navigation robot. The time of fracture reduction assisted by the reduction robot was recorded and the quality of fracture reduction was evaluated according to the Matta scoring criteria. The operation time, intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency and time, intraoperative bleeding volume, and incidence of complications were also recorded. During follow-up, the X-ray film of pelvis was taken to review the fracture healing, and the Majeed score was used to evaluate hip joint function.
    UNASSIGNED: The time of fracture reduction was 42-62 minutes (mean, 52.3 minutes). The quality of fracture reduction according to the Matta scoring criteria was rated as excellent in 4 cases, good in 5 cases, and poor in 1 case, with excellent and good rate of 90%. The operation time was 180-235 minutes (mean, 215.5 minutes). Intraoperative fluoroscopy was performed 18-66 times (mean, 31.8 times). Intraoperative fluoroscopy time was 16-59 seconds (mean, 28.6 seconds). The intraoperative bleeding volume was 50-200 mL (range, 110.0 mL). No significant vascular or nerve injury occurred during operation. All patients were followed up 13-18 months (mean, 16 months). X-ray films showed that all fractures healed with the healing time of 11-14 weeks (mean, 12.3 weeks). One case of ectopic ossification occurred during follow-up. At last follow-up, the Majeed score was 70-92 (mean, 72.7), and the hip joint function was rated as excellent in 2 cases and good in 8 cases, with the excellent and good rate of 100%.
    UNASSIGNED: The reduction robot combined with navigation robot-assisted minimally invasive treatment for Tile type B pelvic fractures has the characteristics of intelligence, high safety, convenient operation, and minimally invasive treatment, which can achieve reliable effectiveness.
    UNASSIGNED: 探讨复位机器人联合导航机器人辅助微创治疗Tile B型骨盆骨折的临床疗效。.
    UNASSIGNED: 回顾性分析2022年1月—2023年2月10例Tile B型骨盆骨折患者临床资料。男6例,女4例;年龄30~71岁,平均45.5岁。致伤原因:交通事故伤5例,重物压伤3例,高处坠落伤2例。受伤至手术时间4~13 d,平均6.8 d。骨折Tile分型:B1型2例,B2型1例,B3型7例。术中复位机器人辅助闭合复位后,在导航机器人辅助下用经皮螺钉联合或不联合内置外固定架固定前环,骶髂关节螺钉固定后环。记录复位机器人辅助骨折复位时间,并参照Matta评分标准评价复位质量。同时记录手术时间、术中透视次数及时间、术中出血量及并发症发生情况;随访期间骨盆X线片复查骨折愈合情况,Majeed评分评价髋关节功能。.
    UNASSIGNED: 10例患者骨盆复位时间42~62 min,平均52.3 min;复位质量根据Matta评分标准,获优4例、良5例、中1例,复位优良率为90%。手术时间180~235 min,平均215.5 min;术中透视18~66次,平均31.8次;术中透视时间16~59 s,平均28.6 s;术中出血量50~200 mL,平均110.0 mL;术中均无重要血管、神经损伤发生。术后患者均获随访,随访时间13~18个月,平均16个月。 X线片复查示骨折均愈合,愈合时间11~14周,平均12.3周;随访期间1例髋关节周围异位骨化形成。末次随访时,髋关节功能Majeed评分达70~92分,平均72.7分;获优2例、良8例,优良率100%。.
    UNASSIGNED: 复位机器人联合导航机器人辅助微创治疗Tile B型骨盆骨折具有智能化、安全性高、操作便捷、微创的特点,可获得可靠疗效。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:报告使用外固定器的患者在磁共振成像(MRI)过程中的不良事件。
    方法:
    方法:回顾性病例系列。
    方法:两个一级创伤中心。
    在2005年1月至2023年9月期间在阑尾骨骼或骨盆上使用外固定器的患者接受MRI检查。
    不良事件,定义为在成像过程中与外部固定器位于MRI孔内部或外部相关的任何不良事件,包括(主观)加热,外固定器的移位或拔出,或因任何原因提前终止MRI。
    结果:共有97例患者使用110个外固定器进行了至少一次MRI扫描,其中外固定器位于MRI孔的内部或外部。中位年龄为51岁(四分位距:39-63),男性为56岁(58%)。最常见的外固定器位置是踝关节(24%),膝盖(21%),股骨(21%),和骨盆(19%)。MRI的中位持续时间为40分钟(四分位距:26-58),86%使用1.5特斯拉MRI,14%使用3.0特斯拉MRI进行。95%的MRI是针对颈椎/头部进行的。两次MRI扫描(1.6%),一个肩膀和一个头部和颈椎,由于患者不适,外固定器在钻孔外被提前终止。没有记录外固定器移位或拔出的事件。
    结论:这些发现表明,对于在阑尾骨骼或骨盆上使用外固定器的患者,可以安全地获得(颈椎)脊柱和头部的MRI扫描。鉴于外固定器在钻孔内进行MRI扫描的次数较少,需要进一步的研究来确定该手术的安全性.这项研究的结果可以帮助整形外科医生,放射科医生,和其他利益相关者制定关于使用外部固定器进行MRI扫描的当地机构指南。
    方法:预后III级。有关证据级别的完整描述,请参阅作者说明。
    OBJECTIVE: To report on adverse events during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with external fixators.
    METHODS:  .
    METHODS: Retrospective case series.
    METHODS: Two Level 1 trauma centers.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with external fixators on the appendicular skeleton or pelvis undergoing MRI between January 2005 and September 2023.
    UNASSIGNED: Adverse events, defined as any undesirable event associated with the external fixator being inside or outside the MRI bore during imaging, including (subjective) heating, displacement or pullout of the external fixator, or early MRI termination for any reason.
    RESULTS: A total of 97 patients with 110 external fixators underwent at least one MRI scan with an external fixator inside or outside of the MRI bore. The median age was 51 years (interquartile range: 39-63) and 56 (58%) were male. The most common external fixator locations were the ankle (24%), knee (21%), femur (21%), and pelvis (19%). The median duration of the MRI was 40 minutes (interquartile range: 26-58), 86% was performed using 1.5-Tesla MRI, and 14% was performed using 3.0-Tesla MRI. Ninety-five percent of MRI was performed for the cervical spine/head. Two MRI scans (1.6%), one of the shoulder and one of the head and cervical spine, with the external fixator outside of the bore were terminated early because of patient discomfort. There were no documented events of displacement or pullout of the external fixator.
    CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that MRI scans of the (cervical) spine and head can be safely obtained in patients with external fixators on the appendicular skeleton or pelvis. Given the low numbers of MRI scans performed with the external fixator inside the bore, additional studies are necessitated to determine the safety of this procedure. The results from this study can aid orthopaedic surgeons, radiologists, and other stakeholders in developing local institutional guidelines on MRI scanning with external fixators in situ.
    METHODS: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:没有踝关节(踝关节)骨折的距骨完全脱位是一种非常罕见的损伤,患病率仅占所有脱位的0.06%,距骨损伤的发生率仅为2%,通常与感染等常见并发症有关,缺血性坏死,和创伤后关节炎。治疗通常包括清创术,reduction,踝关节的稳定,和伤口的初次或二次闭合。
    方法:我们介绍了一名40岁的南亚妇女发生事故的案例。她被紧急送往我们的医院,随后的检查发现,距骨完全脱位,距骨完全从内侧的污染伤口中暴露出来。此外,X线片证实距骨完全脱位,无伴随踝骨折。她立即被带到手术室,在麻醉下进行清创和立即复位,外固定器稳定踝关节约6周。她现在能够承受受影响的脚踝的重量,并且可以承受最小的疼痛,并且脚踝的运动范围正常。
    结论:开放性全距骨脱位而不伴随踝骨折是一种罕见的损伤。减少距骨结合完全的伤口清创可能成功地避免感染,提供早期血运重建预防缺血性坏死,并保留了正常的脚踝解剖结构。
    BACKGROUND: Total talus dislocation without ankle (malleoli) fracture is a very rare injury with prevalence of only 0.06% of all dislocations and only 2% of talar injuries, and are usually associated with common complications such as infection, avascular necrosis, and posttraumatic arthritis. The treatment usually involves debridement, reduction, stabilization of the ankle joint, and primary or secondary closure of the wound.
    METHODS: We present the case of a 40-year-old South Asian woman who was involved in an accident. She was rushed to our hospital, whereby subsequent examination revealed an open total talus dislocation with the talus being exposed in its entirety from a contaminated wound in the medial side. Furthermore, radiograph confirmed total talus dislocation without concomitant malleoli fracture. She was immediately taken to the operating theater whereby debridement and immediate reduction was performed under anesthesia, and the ankle was stabilized with external fixator for about 6 weeks. She is now able to bear weight on the affected ankle with minimal tolerable pain and has normal range of motion of the ankle.
    CONCLUSIONS: Open total talus dislocation without concomitant malleoli fracture is a rare injury. Reduction of the talus in combination with complete wound debridement potentially successfully avoids infection, provides early revascularization preventing avascular necrosis, and preserves the normal ankle anatomy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    一项为期2年的随访研究。
    评估改良的晕-骨盆Ilizarov牵引组件在治疗严重脊柱后凸患者中的有效性。
    严重和僵硬的脊柱侧凸曲线始终是手术外科医生的挑战。通过晕圈骨盆装置进行术前矫正成功地将曲线的严重程度降至最低;然而,其使用也报道了麻烦的并发症。修改后的组装对于这些情况可能是安全的。
    严重脊柱侧后凸(冠状Cobb角>90°)患者术前应用改良的晕圈-骨盆Ilizarov牵引组件。改进的组件由骨盆组件和光环环组成,以2-3毫米/天的速度给予牵引,持续6-12周。进行了完整的临床评估以及肺功能检查,和脊柱侧凸系列X线图像在应用装配前和随访2年期间评估冠状和矢状面Cobb角和其他脊柱骨盆参数。
    34名患者(年龄,9-27岁;男性/女性比例为18:16)。冠状和矢状Cobb角分别为116°±16.2°和84°±28.3°,分别。通过改良的晕圈骨盆组装获得的校正率在冠状面Cobb角中接近52%(p=0.001),在矢状Cobb角中接近40%(p=0.001)。随着身高的提高(p=0.001)。根尖椎体平移和冠状体平衡也显著改善(p=0.001)。在明确的手术后,所有参数都得到了进一步的改善,1秒用力呼气量(p=0.002)和用力肺活量(p=0.001)的改善。
    我们的改良光环-骨盆Ilizarov牵引组件可在严重的脊柱畸形中实现良好的矫正,而不会对神经病学产生重大风险,并发症少,并促进良好的患者依从性。
    METHODS: A 2-year follow-up study.
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of modified halo-pelvic Ilizarov distraction assembly in the management of patients with severe kyphoscoliosis.
    BACKGROUND: Severe and rigid scoliosis curves are always a challenge for operating surgeons. Preoperative correction through halo-pelvic devices successfully minimizes the severity of the curve; however, cumbersome complications are also reported with its use. Modified assembly could be safe for these cases.
    METHODS: Patients with severe kyphoscoliosis having coronal Cobb angle >90° were applied with modified halo-pelvic Ilizarov distraction assembly preoperatively. The modified assembly consisted of a pelvic component and halo ring, and distraction was given at the rate of 2-3 mm/day for 6-12 weeks. Complete clinical assessments along with pulmonary function tests were performed, and scoliosis series X-ray images were assessed for coronal and sagittal Cobb angle and other spinopelvic parameters before applying the assembly and during 2 years of follow-up.
    RESULTS: Thirty-four patients (age, 9-27 years; male/female ratio of 18:16) were included. The coronal and sagittal Cobb angles were 116°±16.2° and 84°±28.3°, respectively. Correction rates obtained through modified halo-pelvic assembly were nearly 52% (p=0.001) in coronal and 40% (p=0.001) in sagittal Cobb angles, with improvement in height (p=0.001). Apical vertebral translation and coronal balance were also improved significantly (p=0.001). Further improvements in all the parameters were obtained after definitive surgery, with improvements in the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (p =0.002) and forced vital capacity (p=0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Our modified halo-pelvic Ilizarov distraction assembly can achieve good correction in severe spinal deformities without significant risk to neurology, has fewer complications, and promotes good patient compliance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:骨转运已成为治疗胫骨大段骨缺损的金标准。应用Ilizarov圆形固定器(ICF)的技术具有较长的学习曲线,并且与许多并发症有关。关于通过泰勒空间框架(TSF)的骨运输的临床研究很少。这项研究的主要目的是通过使用TSF和ICF比较骨运输的放射学和临床以及结果。
    方法:本回顾性研究于2011年6月至2021年6月纳入62例患者,根据固定方法分为两组:TSF组30例,ICF组32例。人口统计信息,手术时间,外固定次数,外固定指数,最终射线照相结果,并发症,记录和检查临床结局.在最近的临床访视期间使用ASAMI标准评估临床结果。然后,进行独立样本t检验或卡方检验等统计分析。
    结果:TSF组的平均手术时间为93.8±7.3分钟,短于ICF组(109.8±1.4min)(p<0.05)。与ICF组相比(10.2±2.0个月),TSF组平均外固定时间(9.7±1.8个月)较短(p>0.05)。两组外固定指数分别为1.4±0.2m/cm和1.5±0.1m/cm。此外,两组间差异无统计学意义。在最后一次后续访问中,TSF组胫骨内侧近端角(MPTA)和胫骨后侧近端角(PPTA)分别为88.1±12.1°和80.9±1.3°,分别。ICF组的MPTA和PPTA分别为84.4±2.4°和76.2±1.9°,分别。两组间差异均有统计学意义(均p<0.05)。TSF组为50%,ICF组为75%。此外,两组间ASAMI评分差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。
    结论:在使用Taylor空间框架和Ilizarov圆形固定器治疗大段胫骨骨缺损的临床效果上没有发现统计学上的显著差异。然而,TSF是一种更短,更简单的程序,可减少并发症并改善肢体对准。
    OBJECTIVE: Bone transport has become the gold standard for treating large segmental tibial bone defects. The technique for application the Ilizarov circular fixator (ICF) has a long learning curve and is associated with many complications. There are few clinical studies on bone transport via the Taylor spatial frame (TSF). The main purpose of this study was to compare the radiological and clinical and outcomes of bone transport by using the TSF and the ICF.
    METHODS: There were 62 patients included in this retrospective study from June 2011 to June 2021 and distributed to two groups according to the fixation method: a TSF group consisting of 30 patients and an ICF group consisting of 32 patients. Demographic information, surgical duration, external fixation times, external fixation index, final radiographic results, complications, and clinical outcomes were recorded and examined. The clinical outcomes were assessed using the ASAMI criteria during the most recent clinical visit. Then, statistical analysis such as independent-samples t tests or chi-Square test was performed.
    RESULTS: The mean surgical duration in the TSF group was 93.8 ± 7.3 min, which was shorter than that in the ICF group (109.8 ± 1.4 min) (p < 0.05). Compared to the ICF group (10.2 ± 2.0 months), the TSF group (9.7 ± 1.8 months) had a shorter average external fixation time (p > 0.05). The external fixation index was 1.4 ± 0.2 m/cm and 1.5 ± 0.1 m/cm in the two groups. Moreover, there was no significant difference between the two groups. At the last follow-up visit, the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and posterior proximal tibial angle (PPTA) in the TSF group were 88.1 ± 12.1° and 80.9 ± 1.3°, respectively. The MPTA and PPTA in the ICF group were 84.4 ± 2.4° and 76.2 ± 1.9°, respectively. There were statistically significant differences between the two groups (all p < 0.05). The complication rate was 50% in the TSF group and 75% in the ICF group. Moreover, the ASAMI score between the two groups was no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: No statistically significant difference was found in clinical outcomes between the use of Taylor spatial frame and Ilizarov circular fixator for treating large segmental tibial bone defects. However, TSF is a shorter and simpler procedure that causes fewer complications and improves limb alignment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在使用单阶段评估切开复位内固定(ORIF)治疗慢性骨周脱位的结果,两阶段,和打捞程序。该研究还将这些方法相互比较,并与现有文献的结果进行比较。
    方法:将2013年至2019年的15例慢性牙周炎损伤患者纳入研究。术前和术后评估使用平片进行,选择性地进行CT扫描以进行详细的形态和断裂模式分析。在患者中,13接受ORIF,而2人接受了打捞程序。在ORIF案件中,对4例患者进行了单阶段手术,以及9例患者的两阶段手术。外部固定器,包括单侧单平面外固定器(UUEF)和双侧单平面外固定器(BUEF),分别应用于5名和4名患者,分别。多年来,我们治疗慢性perilunate损伤的方法不断发展。我们从单阶段ORIF开始,然后逐步进行两个阶段的手术,最初使用外部固定器作为仅在radial侧施加的腕骨撑开器,最后使用在radi侧和尺侧的外部固定器进行双侧腕骨撑开。
    结果:在15名患者中,3人失去了随访。其中,一个接受了四角融合,而其余两人有UUEF。受伤和手术之间的平均时间间隔为3.60个月。术后平均肩胛骨角度52.46°,在两名患者中观察到负射线角(表明屈曲),而其他人则显示为正角度(表示延伸)。2例显示舟骨骨不连和血管坏死(AVN),而一个病例出现了lunateAVN。在4例和2例患者中观察到中腕和放射性腕关节关节炎,分别。使用Mayo的腕部评分对两阶段BUEF病例进行了评估,对UUEF和单阶段手术进行了评估。
    结论:与UUEF相比,利用BUEF进行阶段性减少,然后进行开放减少已证明效果更好,单阶段开放还原和打捞程序。
    方法:4.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for chronic perilunate dislocations using single-stage, two-stage, and salvage procedures. The study also compares these approaches with each other and with results from existing literature.
    METHODS: A total of 15 patients with chronic perilunate injuries from 2013 to 2019 were included in the study. Pre-operative and post-operative assessments were conducted using plain radiographs, with CT scans performed selectively for detailed morphology and fracture pattern analysis. Among the patients, 13 underwent ORIF, while 2 underwent salvage procedures. Among the ORIF cases, single-stage procedures were performed in 4 patients, and two-stage procedures in 9 patients. External fixators, including unilateral uniplanar external fixators (UUEF) and bilateral uniplanar external fixators (BUEF), were applied in 5 and 4 patients, respectively. Our methodology of treating chronic perilunate injuries has evolved over the years. We started with single stage ORIF then graduated to a two staged procedure initially using a external fixator as a carpal distractor applied only on the radial side and finally settling down with bilateral carpal distraction using external fixators both on the radial and ulnar sides.
    RESULTS: Among the 15 patients, 3 were lost to follow-up. Of these, one underwent four-corner fusion, while the remaining two had UUEF. The mean time interval between injury and surgery was 3.60 months. The post-operative mean scapholunate angle measured 52.46°, with a negative radio-lunate angle (indicating flexion) observed in two patients, while others showed a positive angle (indicating extension). Two cases exhibited nonunion and avascular necrosis (AVN) of the scaphoid, while one case presented with lunate AVN. Mid-carpal and radio-carpal arthritis was observed in 4 and 2 patients, respectively. Functional outcomes were evaluated using Mayo\'s wrist score categorized as good for two-stage BUEF cases and satisfactory for UUEF and single-stage procedures.
    CONCLUSIONS: Staged reduction utilizing the BUEF followed by open reduction has demonstrated superior outcomes when compared to UUEF, single-stage open reduction and salvage procedures.
    METHODS: 4.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    踝关节融合术被认为是治疗终末期踝关节关节炎的首选方法。然而,踝关节融合术后邻近关节继发性关节炎的潜在风险引发了关于在孤立胫骨关节(TT)融合术期间保留邻近关节是否会在疼痛和步态不适方面带来任何未来益处的争论.在这项研究中,我们打算介绍使用Ilizarov外固定器进行TT或胫骨关节(TTC)融合后的中期结果,并研究自发融合是否发生在距骨下关节或中关节.
    这是一项回顾性观察性研究。手动搜索1994年至2018年间使用Ilizarov外固定器进行TT或TTC融合治疗踝关节周围大量骨缺损的患者的医疗记录。纳入41例患者,并在影像学检查中评估了与融合部位相邻的关节的状态。
    在接受TT融合的34例患者中,30例患者(88.3%)在相邻关节中自发融合。具体来说,11例患者(29.4%)进行了距下关节融合,19例患者(55.9%)同时进行了tal中关节和距下关节融合。在TTC融合中,所有7例患者均自发融合。
    在这项研究中,我们使用Ilizarov外固定器观察到TT或TTC融合后自发的相邻关节融合,以治疗踝关节周围的大量骨缺损。尽管应该采取谨慎的方法,因为本研究中治疗的患者可能不代表需要主要关节牺牲程序的典型候选人,我们认为,这项研究可能会引起关注TT或TTC融合后邻近关节状态命运的外科医生的关注.
    UNASSIGNED: Ankle fusion is considered a treatment of choice for end-stage ankle arthritis when a total ankle replacement procedure is not indicated. However, the potential risk of secondary arthritis in the adjacent joint after ankle fusion raises arguments on whether preserving the adjacent joint during an isolated tibiotalar (TT) fusion brings about any future benefits with regard to pain and gait discomfort. In this study, we intended to present midterm results following TT or tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) fusion using an Ilizarov external fixator and to investigate whether spontaneous fusion occurred in the subtalar or midtarsal joint.
    UNASSIGNED: This is a retrospective observational study. Medical records of patients who underwent TT or TTC fusion using an Ilizarov external fixator for substantial bone defects around the ankle joint between 1994 and 2018 were manually searched. Forty-one patients were included and the status of the joints adjacent to the fusion site was evaluated in radiographic examinations.
    UNASSIGNED: Of the 34 patients who underwent TT fusion, 30 patients (88.3%) had a spontaneous fusion in the adjacent joints. Specifically, 11 patients (29.4%) had subtalar joint fusion and 19 patients (55.9%) had both midtarsal joint and subtalar joint fusion. In TTC fusion, the midtarsal joint was spontaneously fused in all 7 patients.
    UNASSIGNED: In this study, we observed spontaneous adjacent joint fusion following TT or TTC fusion using an Ilizarov external fixator for substantial bone defects around the ankle joint. Although a careful approach should be made since patients treated in this study may not represent typical candidates that need primary joint-sacrificing procedures, we believe that this study may draw attention from surgeons concerned about the fate of the adjacent joint status after TT or TTC fusion.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号