Artificial intelligence

人工智能
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    适用于iOS的CorneAI是一种人工智能(AI)应用程序,可将角膜和白内障的状况分为九类:正常,感染性角膜炎,非感染性角膜炎,疤痕,肿瘤,押金,急性原发性闭角,晶状体不透明度,和大疱性角膜病变.我们评估了其性能,以在《角膜杂志》上发表的图像中对各种种族的角膜和白内障的多种状况进行分类。预测得分最高的顶级分类的阳性预测值(PPV)为0.75,前三个分类的PPV超过0.80。对于个别疾病,感染性角膜炎的PPV最高分别为0.91、0.73、0.42、0.72、0.77和0.55,正常,非感染性角膜炎,疤痕,肿瘤,和存款,分别。适用于iOS的CorneAI在正常受试者工作特性曲线下的面积为0.78(95%置信区间[CI]0.5-1.0),感染性角膜炎为0.76(95%CI0.67-0.85),非感染性角膜炎为0.81(95%CI0.64-0.97),疤痕为0.55(95%CI0.41-0.69),肿瘤为0.62(95%CI0.27-0.97),存款为0.71(95%CI0.53-0.89)。当用于诊断日志图像时,CorneAI在对角膜和白内障的各种状况进行分类方面表现良好,包括那些具有可变成像条件的,种族,和罕见病例。
    CorneAI for iOS is an artificial intelligence (AI) application to classify the condition of the cornea and cataract into nine categories: normal, infectious keratitis, non-infection keratitis, scar, tumor, deposit, acute primary angle closure, lens opacity, and bullous keratopathy. We evaluated its performance to classify multiple conditions of the cornea and cataract of various races in images published in the Cornea journal. The positive predictive value (PPV) of the top classification with the highest predictive score was 0.75, and the PPV for the top three classifications exceeded 0.80. For individual diseases, the highest PPVs were 0.91, 0.73, 0.42, 0.72, 0.77, and 0.55 for infectious keratitis, normal, non-infection keratitis, scar, tumor, and deposit, respectively. CorneAI for iOS achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.78 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.5-1.0) for normal, 0.76 (95% CI 0.67-0.85) for infectious keratitis, 0.81 (95% CI 0.64-0.97) for non-infection keratitis, 0.55 (95% CI 0.41-0.69) for scar, 0.62 (95% CI 0.27-0.97) for tumor, and 0.71 (95% CI 0.53-0.89) for deposit. CorneAI performed well in classifying various conditions of the cornea and cataract when used to diagnose journal images, including those with variable imaging conditions, ethnicities, and rare cases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    为改进当前我国高校油画教学模式,本研究结合深度学习技术和人工智能技术对油画教学进行探索。首先,分析了个性化教育的研究现状和基于画笔特征的图像分类的相关研究。其次,基于卷积神经网络,数学形态学,和支持向量机,构建了油画分类模型,其中提取的特征包括颜色和画笔特征。此外,基于人工智能技术和个性化教育理论,构建了个性化的智能油画教学框架。最后,评价了智能油画分类模型的性能,并阐述了个性化智能油画教学框架的内容。结果表明,当只提取画笔特征时,油画的平均分类准确率为90.25%。当仅提取颜色特征时,平均分类准确率超过89%。当提取两个特征时,油画分类模型的平均准确率达到94.03%。迭代二分法3、决策树C4.5和支持向量机的平均分类准确率为82.24%,83.57%,和94.03%。大小为50的历元数据的训练速度比大小为100的历元原始数据的训练速度快,但精度略有下降。个性化油画教学系统帮助学生根据自身情况调整学习计划,避免学习重复的内容,最终提高学生的学习效率。与其他研究相比,本研究获得了良好的油画分类模式和个性化的油画教育体系,对油画教学起到积极作用。本研究为高等艺术教育的发展奠定了基础。
    To improve the current oil painting teaching mode in Chinese universities, this study combines deep learning technology and artificial intelligence technology to explore oil painting teaching. Firstly, the research status of individualized education and related research on image classification based on brush features are analyzed. Secondly, based on a convolutional neural network, mathematical morphology, and support vector machine, the oil painting classification model is constructed, in which the extracted features include color and brush features. Moreover, based on artificial intelligence technology and individualized education theory, a personalized intelligent oil painting teaching framework is built. Finally, the performance of the intelligent oil painting classification model is evaluated, and the content of the personalized intelligent oil painting teaching framework is explained. The results show that the average classification accuracy of oil painting is 90.25% when only brush features are extracted. When only color features are extracted, the average classification accuracy is over 89%. When the two features are extracted, the average accuracy of the oil painting classification model reaches 94.03%. Iterative Dichotomiser3, decision tree C4.5, and support vector machines have an average classification accuracy of 82.24%, 83.57%, and 94.03%. The training speed of epochs data with size 50 is faster than that of epochs original data with size 100, but the accuracy is slightly decreased. The personalized oil painting teaching system helps students adjust their learning plans according to their conditions, avoid learning repetitive content, and ultimately improve students\' learning efficiency. Compared with other studies, this study obtains a good oil painting classification model and a personalized oil painting education system that plays a positive role in oil painting teaching. This study has laid the foundation for the development of higher art education.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:系统综述(SRs)正在加速发布。决策者可能很难在同一主题的多个SR之间进行比较和选择。我们的目标是了解医疗保健决策者(例如,从业者,政策制定者,研究人员)使用SR为决策提供信息,并探索拟议的人工智能(AI)工具的潜在作用,以协助进行关键评估和选择SR。
    方法:我们开发了一项包含21个开放式和封闭式问题的调查。我们遵循知识翻译计划,通过社交媒体和专业网络传播调查。
    结果:我们的调查回复率低于预期(已分发电子邮件的7.9%)。在684名受访者中,58.2%被认定为研究人员,37.1%作为从业者,学生占19.2%,决策者占13.5%。受访者经常寻找SR(97.1%)作为决策的证据来源。他们经常(97.9%)在他们感兴趣的给定主题上发现多个SR。刚刚超过一半(50.8%)的人努力在多个人中选择最值得信赖的SR。这些困难与缺乏时间有关(55.2%),或由于SRs的方法学质量不同而难以比较(54.2%),结果和结论的差异(49.7%)或纳入研究的变异(44.6%)。受访者根据与他们感兴趣的问题的相关性比较了SR,方法学质量,和最近的SR搜索。大多数受访者(87.0%)对AI工具感兴趣,以帮助评估和比较SR。
    结论:鉴于使用SR证据的已识别障碍,一种人工智能工具,用于方便比较SR的相关性,搜索和方法学质量,可以帮助用户有效地在SR中进行选择并做出医疗保健决策。
    BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews (SRs) are being published at an accelerated rate. Decision-makers may struggle with comparing and choosing between multiple SRs on the same topic. We aimed to understand how healthcare decision-makers (eg, practitioners, policymakers, researchers) use SRs to inform decision-making and to explore the potential role of a proposed artificial intelligence (AI) tool to assist in critical appraisal and choosing among SRs.
    METHODS: We developed a survey with 21 open and closed questions. We followed a knowledge translation plan to disseminate the survey through social media and professional networks.
    RESULTS: Our survey response rate was lower than expected (7.9% of distributed emails). Of the 684 respondents, 58.2% identified as researchers, 37.1% as practitioners, 19.2% as students and 13.5% as policymakers. Respondents frequently sought out SRs (97.1%) as a source of evidence to inform decision-making. They frequently (97.9%) found more than one SR on a given topic of interest to them. Just over half (50.8%) struggled to choose the most trustworthy SR among multiple. These difficulties related to lack of time (55.2%), or difficulties comparing due to varying methodological quality of SRs (54.2%), differences in results and conclusions (49.7%) or variation in the included studies (44.6%). Respondents compared SRs based on the relevance to their question of interest, methodological quality, and recency of the SR search. Most respondents (87.0%) were interested in an AI tool to help appraise and compare SRs.
    CONCLUSIONS: Given the identified barriers of using SR evidence, an AI tool to facilitate comparison of the relevance of SRs, the search and methodological quality, could help users efficiently choose among SRs and make healthcare decisions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在使用基于人工智能(AI)的彩色眼底照片(CFP)分析,定量评估远视儿童视神经乳头和视网膜血管参数与年龄和等效球面屈光度(SER)的关系。
    方法:这项横断面研究包括324名年龄在3-12岁的远视儿童。将参与者分为低远视(SER0.5D至2.0D)和中度至高度远视(SER≥2.0D)组。眼底参数,如视盘面积和平均血管直径,使用AI自动和定量检测。单变量分析中的显著变量(p<0.05)包括在逐步多元线性回归中。
    结果:总体而言,包括324名儿童,低172和中至高远视152。中位视盘面积和血管直径分别为1.42mm2和65.09µm,分别。高度远视儿童的上神经视网膜边缘(NRR)宽度和血管直径均大于低,中度远视儿童。在单变量分析中,轴向长度与较小的上NRR宽度显着相关(β=-3.030,p<0.001),更小的时间NRR宽度(β=-1.469,p=0.020)和更小的血管直径(β=-0.076,p<0.001)。视盘面积和垂直盘直径随年龄的变化呈轻度负相关。
    结论:基于AI的CFP分析显示,高度远视儿童的平均血管直径较大,但垂直杯盘比小于低远视儿童。这表明AI可以提供远视儿童眼底参数的定量数据。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to quantitatively evaluate optic nerve head and retinal vascular parameters in children with hyperopia in relation to age and spherical equivalent refraction (SER) using artificial intelligence (AI)-based analysis of colour fundus photographs (CFP).
    METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 324 children with hyperopia aged 3-12 years. Participants were divided into low hyperopia (SER+0.5 D to+2.0 D) and moderate-to-high hyperopia (SER≥+2.0 D) groups. Fundus parameters, such as optic disc area and mean vessel diameter, were automatically and quantitatively detected using AI. Significant variables (p<0.05) in the univariate analysis were included in a stepwise multiple linear regression.
    RESULTS: Overall, 324 children were included, 172 with low and 152 with moderate-to-high hyperopia. The median optic disc area and vessel diameter were 1.42 mm2 and 65.09 µm, respectively. Children with high hyperopia had larger superior neuroretinal rim (NRR) width and larger vessel diameter than those with low and moderate hyperopia. In the univariate analysis, axial length was significantly associated with smaller superior NRR width (β=-3.030, p<0.001), smaller temporal NRR width (β=-1.469, p=0.020) and smaller vessel diameter (β=-0.076, p<0.001). A mild inverse correlation was observed between the optic disc area and vertical disc diameter with age.
    CONCLUSIONS: AI-based CFP analysis showed that children with high hyperopia had larger mean vessel diameter but smaller vertical cup-to-disc ratio than those with low hyperopia. This suggests that AI can provide quantitative data on fundus parameters in children with hyperopia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    从教育小册子到万维网的自然发展,现在是人工智能(AI),OpenAI聊天机器人提供了一种获取病理特定患者信息的简单方法,然而,关于足踝手术信息的可读性和质量知之甚少。本调查使用市售的OpenAIChatGPTChatbot和FootCareMD®比较了这些信息。查询来自FootCareMD®的常见足部和踝关节病变列表,并使用ChatGPT与类似结果进行比较。从这两种资源中,计算每种情况下的Flesch阅读轻松评分(FRES)和Flesch-Kincaid等级(FKGL)评分。使用JAMA基准标准评分和DISCERN评分对每个查询进行定性分析。总体ChatGPT和FootCareMD®FRES评分分别为31.12±7.86和55.18±7.27(p<0.0001)。ChatGPT和FootCareMD®FKGL总分分别为13.79±1.22和9.60±1.24(p<0.0001),除Pilon骨折FKGL评分外(p=0.09)。通过ChatGPT和FootCareMD®获得的所有信息的平均JAMA基准分别为0±0和1.95±0.15(p<0.001),分别。通过ChatGPT和FootCareMD®获得的所有信息的DISCERN评分分别为52.53±5.39和66.93±4.57(p<0.001),分别。与FootCareMD®上提供的类似信息相比,有关常见足部和踝关节病变的AI辅助查询的等级更高,可靠性和准确性较低。随着AI技术的易用性和增加,应考虑与足部和踝关节疾病的诊断和治疗有关的信息的性质和质量。证据级别:IV.
    As a natural progression from educational pamphlets to the worldwide web, and now artificial intelligence (AI), OpenAI chatbots provide a simple way of obtaining pathology-specific patient information, however, little is known concerning the readability and quality of foot and ankle surgery information. This investigation compares such information using the commercially available OpenAI ChatGPT Chatbot and FootCareMD®. A list of common foot and ankle pathologies from FootCareMD® were queried and compared with similar results using ChatGPT. From both resources, the Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES) and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) scores were calculated for each condition. Qualitative analysis of each query was performed using the JAMA Benchmark Criteria Score and the DISCERN Score.The overall ChatGPT and FootCareMD® FRES scores were 31.12±7.86 and 55.18±7.27, respectively (p<0.0001). The overall ChatGPT and FootCareMD® FKGL scores were 13.79±1.22 and 9.60±1.24 respectively (p<0.0001), except for the pilon fracture FKGL scores (p=0.09). The average JAMA Benchmark for all information obtained through ChatGPT and FootCareMD® were 0±0 and 1.95±0.15 (p < 0.001), respectively. The DISCERN Score for all information obtained through ChatGPT and FootCareMD® were 52.53±5.39 and 66.93±4.57 (p < 0.001), respectively. AI-assisted queries concerning common foot and ankle pathologies are written at a higher grade level and with less reliability and accuracy compared to similar information available on FootCareMD®. With the ease of use and increase in AI technology, consideration should be given to the nature and quality of information being shared with respect to the diagnosis and treatment of foot and ankle conditions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:该研究旨在确定与CVD相关的最关键的参数,并采用新颖的数据集成细化程序来揭示这些参数的最佳模式,这可以导致高预测精度。
    结果:总共收集了369名患者的数据,281名患有CVD或有发展风险的患者,与88个其他健康的人相比。在281名心血管疾病或高危患者中,53例被诊断为冠状动脉疾病(CAD),16患有终末期肾病,47例新诊断为2型糖尿病和92例慢性炎症性疾病(21类风湿性关节炎,41牛皮癣,30血管炎)。使用基于人工智能的算法分析数据,其主要目的是识别定义CVD的参数的最佳模式。该研究强调了使用DERGA和ExtraTrees算法识别心血管疾病可能性的六参数组合的有效性。这些参数,按重要性排序,包括血小板衍生的微囊泡(PMV),高血压,年龄,吸烟,血脂异常,身体质量指数(BMI)。内皮和红细胞MV,与糖尿病一起是最不重要的预测因素。此外,达到的最高预测精度为98.64%。值得注意的是,单独使用PMV可以获得91.32%的准确率,而采用所有十个参数的最优模型,得到的预测精度为0.9783(97.83%)。
    结论:我们的研究显示了DERGA的疗效,一种创新的数据集成细化贪婪算法。DERGA加速评估个体发生CVD的风险,允许早期诊断,显著减少所需实验室测试的数量,并优化资源利用率。此外,它有助于确定对评估CVD敏感性至关重要的最佳参数,从而增强我们对潜在机制的理解。
    BACKGROUND: The study aimed to determine the most crucial parameters associated with CVD and employ a novel data ensemble refinement procedure to uncover the optimal pattern of these parameters that can result in a high prediction accuracy.
    RESULTS: Data were collected from 369 patients in total, 281 patients with CVD or at risk of developing it, compared to 88 otherwise healthy individuals. Within the group of 281 CVD or at-risk patients, 53 were diagnosed with coronary artery disease (CAD), 16 with end-stage renal disease, 47 newly diagnosed with diabetes mellitus 2 and 92 with chronic inflammatory disorders (21 rheumatoid arthritis, 41 psoriasis, 30 angiitis). The data were analyzed using an artificial intelligence-based algorithm with the primary objective of identifying the optimal pattern of parameters that define CVD. The study highlights the effectiveness of a six-parameter combination in discerning the likelihood of cardiovascular disease using DERGA and Extra Trees algorithms. These parameters, ranked in order of importance, include Platelet-derived Microvesicles (PMV), hypertension, age, smoking, dyslipidemia, and Body Mass Index (BMI). Endothelial and erythrocyte MVs, along with diabetes were the least important predictors. In addition, the highest prediction accuracy achieved is 98.64%. Notably, using PMVs alone yields a 91.32% accuracy, while the optimal model employing all ten parameters, yields a prediction accuracy of 0.9783 (97.83%).
    CONCLUSIONS: Our research showcases the efficacy of DERGA, an innovative data ensemble refinement greedy algorithm. DERGA accelerates the assessment of an individual\'s risk of developing CVD, allowing for early diagnosis, significantly reduces the number of required lab tests and optimizes resource utilization. Additionally, it assists in identifying the optimal parameters critical for assessing CVD susceptibility, thereby enhancing our understanding of the underlying mechanisms.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:CT肺动脉造影是诊断肺栓塞的金标准,正在开发DL算法来管理需求的增长。nnU-Net是一种新的自适应DL框架,可最大限度地减少手动调谐,即使没有特定的专业知识,也可以更轻松地开发有效的医学成像算法。本研究评估了在RSPECT数据集上本地开发的nnU-Net算法用于PE检测的性能,凝块体积测量,与右心室超负荷有关。
    方法:用户输入仅限于使用3DSlicer进行分割。我们使用RSPECT数据集,并从205个PE和340个阴性中训练了一个算法。测试数据集包括6573项检查。针对PE特性测试了性能,如中央,非中心,RV过载。从每次检查中提取血凝块体积(BCV)。我们采用ROC曲线和逻辑回归进行统计验证。
    结果:阴性研究的中位BCV为1μL,在PE阳性病例中增加到345μL,在中央PE中增加到7,378μL。统计分析证实了BCV与PE存在的显着相关性,中央PE,RV/LV比值增加(p<0.0001)。用于PE检测的模型AUC为0.865,在55μL阈值下具有83%的准确度。中心PE检测AUC为0.937,在850μL时准确度为91%。RV过载AUC为0.848,准确度为79%。
    结论:nnU-Net算法证明了准确的PE检测,特别是中央PE。BCV是自动严重性分层和案例优先级排序的准确指标。
    结论:nnU-Net框架可用于创建可靠的DL以检测PE。它为那些缺乏人工智能专业知识的人提供了一种用户友好的方法,并快速提取血块体积,可以评估PE严重性的度量。
    OBJECTIVE: CT pulmonary angiography is the gold standard for diagnosing pulmonary embolism, and DL algorithms are being developed to manage the increase in demand. The nnU-Net is a new auto-adaptive DL framework that minimizes manual tuning, making it easier to develop effective algorithms for medical imaging even without specific expertise. This study assesses the performance of a locally developed nnU-Net algorithm on the RSPECT dataset for PE detection, clot volume measurement, and correlation with right ventricle overload.
    METHODS: User input was limited to segmentation using 3DSlicer. We worked with the RSPECT dataset and trained an algorithm from 205 PE and 340 negatives. The test dataset comprised 6573 exams. Performance was tested against PE characteristics, such as central, non-central, and RV overload. Blood clot volume (BCV) was extracted from each exam. We employed ROC curves and logistic regression for statistical validation.
    RESULTS: Negative studies had a median BCV of 1 μL, which increased to 345 μL in PE-positive cases and 7,378 μL in central PEs. Statistical analysis confirmed a significant BCV correlation with PE presence, central PE, and increased RV/LV ratio (p < 0.0001). The model\'s AUC for PE detection was 0.865, with an 83 % accuracy at a 55 μL threshold. Central PE detection AUC was 0.937 with 91 % accuracy at 850 μL. The RV overload AUC stood at 0.848 with 79 % accuracy.
    CONCLUSIONS: The nnU-Net algorithm demonstrated accurate PE detection, particularly for central PE. BCV is an accurate metric for automated severity stratification and case prioritization.
    CONCLUSIONS: The nnU-Net framework can be utilized to create a dependable DL for detecting PE. It offers a user-friendly approach to those lacking expertise in AI and rapidly extracts the Blood Clot Volume, a metric that can evaluate the PE\'s severity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:透析性低血压(IDH)是血液透析中最常见和最严重的并发症之一。尽管有许多与IDH相关的证明因素,在透析期间对个体患者进行准确预测仍然是一个挑战。
    目的:为IDH建立人工智能(AI)预测模型,其中考虑了以前和正在进行的透析的风险因素,以优化模型性能。然后,我们实施了一种新颖的数字仪表板,该仪表板具有最佳模型,可连续监测血液透析患者的状态。AI仪表板可以显示血液透析中心中每位患者的IDH的实时概率,为护理成员提供客观参考,以提前监测IDH并对其进行治疗。
    方法:八种机器学习(ML)算法,包括Logistic回归(LR),随机森林(RF),支持向量机(SVM)K近邻(KNN),光梯度升压机(LightGBM),多层感知(MLP),极限梯度提升(XGBoost),和NaiveBayes,用于建立IDH的预测模型,以确定患者是否会在60分钟内获得IDH。除了实时功能,我们结合了从以前的透析会话中获得的几个功能,以提高模型的性能。本研究包括2020年9月1日至2020年12月31日在奇美医学中心接受血液透析的患者的电子病历。通过IDH率进行AI辅助的影响评估。
    结果:结果表明,XGBoost模型具有最佳性能(准确性:0.858,灵敏度:0.858,特异性:0.858,曲线下面积:0.936),并选择用于AI仪表板实施。护理成员对仪表板感到高兴,该仪表板以图形样式提供了IDH风险的实时科学概率和历史预测记录。其他有价值的功能也附加在仪表板中。影响评估表明,在应用AI辅助后,IDH率显着下降。
    结论:此AI仪表板为血液透析期间的IDH风险预测提供了高质量的结果。IDH的高危患者将提前60分钟被识别,作为治疗计划的一部分,促进个性化的预防性干预。我们的方法被认为是IDH管理的绝佳方式。
    BACKGROUND: Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) is one of the most common and critical complications of hemodialysis. Despite many proven factors associated with IDH, accurately predicting it before it occurs for individual patients during dialysis sessions remains a challenge.
    OBJECTIVE: To establish artificial intelligence (AI) predictive models for IDH, which consider risk factors from previous and ongoing dialysis to optimize model performance. We then implement a novel digital dashboard with the best model for continuous monitoring of patients\' status undergoing hemodialysis. The AI dashboard can display the real-time probability of IDH for each patient in the hemodialysis center providing an objective reference for care members for monitoring IDH and treating it in advance.
    METHODS: Eight machine learning (ML) algorithms, including Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), K Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), Multilayer Perception (MLP), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and NaiveBayes, were used to establish the predictive model of IDH to determine if the patient will acquire IDH within 60 min. In addition to real-time features, we incorporated several features sourced from previous dialysis sessions to improve the model\'s performance. The electronic medical records of patients who had undergone hemodialysis at Chi Mei Medical Center between September 1, 2020 and December 31, 2020 were included in this research. Impact evaluation of AI assistance was conducted by IDH rate.
    RESULTS: The results showed that the XGBoost model had the best performance (accuracy: 0.858, sensitivity: 0.858, specificity: 0.858, area under the curve: 0.936) and was chosen for AI dashboard implementation. The care members were delighted with the dashboard providing real-time scientific probabilities for IDH risk and historic predictive records in a graphic style. Other valuable functions were appended in the dashboard as well. Impact evaluation indicated a significant decrease in IDH rate after the application of AI assistance.
    CONCLUSIONS: This AI dashboard provides high-quality results in IDH risk prediction during hemodialysis. High-risk patients for IDH will be recognized 60 min earlier, promoting individualized preventive interventions as part of the treatment plan. Our approachis believed to promise an excellent way for IDH management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    人工智能(AI)技术在科学研究中的应用大大提高了效率和准确性,但也引入了新形式的学术不端行为,例如使用AI算法进行数据制造和文本抄袭。这些做法危及研究完整性,并可能误导科学方向。这项研究解决了这些挑战,强调学术界需要加强道德规范,提高研究人员资格,建立严格的审查机制。确保负责和透明的研究过程,我们建议采取以下具体关键行动:制定和执行全面的人工智能研究完整性指南,其中包括在数据分析和发布中使用人工智能的明确协议,确保人工智能辅助研究的透明度和问责制。为研究人员实施强制性AI道德和诚信培训,旨在促进对潜在人工智能滥用的深入理解,并促进伦理研究实践。建立国际合作框架,促进最佳实践交流和制定人工智能研究的统一伦理标准。保护研究完整性对于维护公众对科学的信任至关重要,使这些建议迫切需要科学界的考虑和行动。
    The application of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in scientific research has significantly enhanced efficiency and accuracy but also introduced new forms of academic misconduct, such as data fabrication and text plagiarism using AI algorithms. These practices jeopardize research integrity and can mislead scientific directions. This study addresses these challenges, underscoring the need for the academic community to strengthen ethical norms, enhance researcher qualifications, and establish rigorous review mechanisms. To ensure responsible and transparent research processes, we recommend the following specific key actions: Development and enforcement of comprehensive AI research integrity guidelines that include clear protocols for AI use in data analysis and publication, ensuring transparency and accountability in AI-assisted research. Implementation of mandatory AI ethics and integrity training for researchers, aimed at fostering an in-depth understanding of potential AI misuses and promoting ethical research practices. Establishment of international collaboration frameworks to facilitate the exchange of best practices and development of unified ethical standards for AI in research. Protecting research integrity is paramount for maintaining public trust in science, making these recommendations urgent for the scientific community consideration and action.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号