BACKGROUND: Methamphetamine (MA) (Mkpurummiri) is seen as the most common, accessible and new drug of use/abuse in south east Nigeria. Despite the overwhelming evidence of the dire consequences of this drug to the users, there is lack of empirical research to determine its prevalence in this area where use is assumed to be common. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of MA use, characteristics of the users and the control measures.
METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional survey research design was conducted from May through November 2023 among adolescents/adults at the age bracket of 15-64 years in the five states of south east, Nigeria. Three hundred and seventy-one (371) respondents were recruited using purposive/convenience sampling methods. A semi structured questionnaire was the instrument used. Data were analyzed using percentage, bivariate and multivariate logistics regression statistics. The Prevalence of MA was determined using percentages whereas the factors that are associated with MA use were expressed using multivariate logistics regression statistics AORs and 95%CIs. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05.
RESULTS: The prevalence of Methamphetamine (Mkpurummiri) was (21.8%). The most common reason for MA use was depression (86.5%), the most common route of administration was inhalation (64.9%). The most common characteristic of MA (Mkpurummiri) user was aggressive/violent behaviour (94.1%).The control measures were self-control (92.2%), parental monitoring (85.7%), drug education (83.1%) and legal control (80.8%). The multivariate logistics regression statistics AOR shows that off-campus were 3 times (AOR = 0.298; CI = 0.12-0.73 P = 0.008), family house 4 times (AOR = 0.241; CI = 0.09-0.65; P = 0.005 ≤ 0.05 ) less likely than on-campus to predict MA use. Recently married were 3.25 times (aOR = 3.25; CI = 1.47-7.18), divorced 3.45 times (aOR = 3.45; CI = 1.23-9.58), polygamy 2.3 times (aOR = 2.3; CI = 1.08-4.90; P = 0.031 ≤ 0.05 ), tradition 4.44 times (aOR = 4.44; CI = 1.77-11.15; P = 0.001 ≤ 0.05 ) , more likely than others to use MA.
CONCLUSIONS: MA use prevalence was relatively high, and marital status, living arrangements, family type and religion were the predictors. These findings underscore the need for concerted effort among the relevant government agencies, community stakeholders, families, religious bodies and school authorities to designing MA use policy/laws with special focus on adopting the punitive measure used in checking cocaine users. This may help to arrest and prosecute the manufacturers, distributors and users of MA.

Combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) has dramatically reduced mortality in people with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), but it does not completely eradicate the virus from the brain. Patients with long-term HIV-1 infection often show neurocognitive impairment, which severely affects the quality of life of those infected. Methamphetamine (METH) users are at a significantly higher risk of contracting HIV-1 through behaviors such as engaging in high-risk sex or sharing needles, which can lead to transmission of the virus. In addition, HIV-1-infected individuals who abuse METH exhibit higher viral loads and more severe cognitive dysfunction, suggesting that METH exacerbates the neurotoxicity associated with HIV-1. Therefore, this review focuses on various mechanisms underlying METH and HIV-1 infection co-induced neurotoxicity and existing interventions targeting the sigma 1 receptor, dopamine transporter protein, and other relevant targets are explored. The findings of this review are envisaged to systematically establish a theoretical framework for METH abuse and HIV-1 infection co-induced neurotoxicity, and to suggest novel clinical treatment targets.

A number of studies have reported that drug addiction is associated with microRNAs (miRNAs). However, the roles of plasma miRNAs in methamphetamine (METH) addicts have not been clearly explained. This study aimed to profile a panel of miRNAs as non-invasive predictive biomarkers and therapeutic targets for METH addiction. Differentially expressed miRNAs were derived from next-generation sequencing technology (NGS) and were validated by quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR). The diagnostic value of specific altered miRNAs was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and area under the curve (AUC). NGS results revealed that 63 miRNAs were significantly altered in the METH-exposed paradigm. The levels of hsa-miR-592, hsa-miR-9-3p, hsa-miR-206 and hsa-let-7b-3p were significantly elevated in the plasma of METH addicts. Hsa-miR-9-3p was a useful biomarker discriminating METH addicts from normal (AUC was 0.756). Importantly, combining detection of hsa-miR-592 and hsa-miR-9-3p achieved the highest AUC of 0.87, with a sensitivity and specificity of 82.7% and 78.9%, respectively. Target gene BDNF decreased significantly in METH addicts. Although METH addicts showed significant depressive symptoms, there was no correlation between the expression level of miR-592 and miR-9-3p and the degree of depression. Our findings suggested that hsa-miR-592, hsa-miR-9-3p, hsa-miR-206, and hsa-let-7b-3p may play a potential role in the pathology of METH addiction, and a combination of hsa-miR-592 and hsa-miR-9-3p could serve as potential peripheral biomarker and therapeutic target for METH addiction.

Our study assessed the association between methamphetamine (i.e., crystal meth, CM) use and awareness and interest in event-driven (ED) PrEP among HIV-negative and those with unknown serostatus cisgender males and transgender people. We performed log-binomial regression analysis to predict awareness (i.e., having heard of ED PrEP) and being interested in ED PrEP. We found that participants who recently used CM were less likely to know of ED PrEP (aPR = 0.83, 95% CI [0.69, 0.99]) but more interested in ED PrEP (aPR = 1.12, 95% CI [1.01, 1.30]), after accounting for demographic and HIV-related behaviors. Opportunities to expand PrEP uptake and improve adherence among individuals who report CM use are essential to impact the HIV epidemic significantly. Continued research on the needs and best practices to work with this community is needed to ensure a successful rollout and implementation of ED PrEP.

OBJECTIVE: The correctional system continues to face challenges with responding to and managing methamphetamine use among incarcerated individuals. This study aims to uncover what resources and policies could better help correctional workers deal with these challenges. The authors also examined methamphetamine\'s impact on correctional work and staff well-being.
METHODS: An online survey was distributed to correctional workers (n = 269) in Manitoba, Canada, featuring questions about their experiences related to methamphetamine use in populations under their care, what supports are needed to adequately address the concern, and the potential effects on self and their occupational responsibilities. Using NVivo software, survey responses were analysed using an emergent theme approach.
RESULTS: Correctional workers believed policies and protocols for managing methamphetamine use and withdrawal are currently inadequate. Correctional workers reported having monthly contact with incarcerated individuals experiencing methamphetamine withdrawal, posing safety concerns to them and other incarcerated individuals. Respondents proposed more education and training on managing incarcerated people withdrawing from methamphetamines, related to the symptoms of use and withdrawal and how to support persons detoxing. Increased human and material resources were reported as being needed (e.g. more nurses onsite and better screening devices). Respondents also desired more medical intervention, safe living spaces for methamphetamine users and programming to support addiction.
CONCLUSIONS: The current study unpacks correctional workers\' perspectives, support desires and their experiences managing methamphetamine use amongst incarcerated people. The authors discuss the required knowledge to respond to gaps in prison living, re-entry and related policy needs.

BACKGROUND: This study describes the protocol for a systematic review. The systematic review will address experiences of managing methamphetamine intoxication, specifically violence and agitation related to intoxication, in the emergency department (ED).
METHODS: This study uses the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system to guide the methods in this section. The primary objective of the review is to identify experimental studies assessing the effectiveness of both pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies to manage acute methamphetamine intoxication in patients presenting violently in the ED. Our secondary objectives will be to assess the impact of specific strategies on the time it takes to achieve de-escalation and/or sedation, the length of stay in the ED, frequency of admission, mortality and provider satisfaction with the intervention.
BACKGROUND: Ethics approval has been obtained from the Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board REB21-1387. Results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at healthcare conferences in Canada.
BACKGROUND: The protocol is registered through the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (identification number: CRD42020157938) and will be reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extensions for systematic review protocols.

BACKGROUND: Methamphetamine use and related direct and indirect problems are increasing all over the world. The coexistence of lifetime marijuana use (LMU) and methamphetamine use disorder (MUD) may also be accompanied by psychotic symptoms (MAP). Methamphetamine and marijuana use are known to pose risks for cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). However, ten-year CVD risk and inflammation markers of LMU-MUD (non-psychosis group) and LMU-MAP (psychosis group) subjects and the relationship of various sociodemographic and clinical variables with these markers have not yet been examined.
METHODS: Thirty-two male subjects were included in non-psychosis group and 72 male subjects in psychosis group. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were recorded. Psychotic symptom severity of psychosis group subjects was measured. The ten-year CVD risk was calculated using QRISK®3 model.
RESULTS: Age, cigarettes/pack-years, alcohol use onset age, drug use onset age, methamphetamine use onset age, duration of methamphetamine use, education and marital status of the groups were similar (p > 0.05). There was a statistical difference between the non-psychosis and psychosis groups in terms of self-mutilation history (p < 0.001), suicidal attempt history (p = 0.007), homicidal attempt history (p = 0.002), psychiatric hospitalization history (p = 0.010). Ten-year QRISK®3 score was 4.90 ± 9.30 in the psychosis group, while it was 1.60 ± 1.43 in the non-psychosis group (p = 0.004). The mean heart age of the psychosis group was 14 years higher than their chronological age, while the mean heart age of the non-psychosis group was 8 years higher. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (p = 0.003) was higher in the psychosis group. A significant correlation was detected between ten-year QRISK®3 and positive psychotic symptoms in the psychosis group (r = 0.274, p = 0.020). Regression analysis showed that self-mutilation history, NLR and relative risk obtained from QRISK®3 can be used to distinguish non-psychosis group and psychosis group subjects (sensitivity = 91.7; Nagelkerke R2 0.438; p = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: This study is important as it demonstrates for the first time that among the subjects using marijuana and methamphetamine, those with psychotic symptoms have a higher NLR and ten-year CVD risk.

BACKGROUND: The group-I metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5 (mGlu5) has been implicated in methamphetamine exposure in animals and in human cognition. Because people with methamphetamine use disorder (MUD) exhibit cognitive deficits, we evaluated mGlu5 in people with MUD and controls and tested its association with cognitive performance.
METHODS: Positron emission tomography was performed to measure the total VT of [18F]FPEB, a radiotracer for mGlu5, in brains of participants with MUD (abstinent from methamphetamine for at least 2 weeks, N = 14) and a control group (N = 14). Drug use history questionnaires and tests of verbal learning, spatial working memory, and executive function were administered. Associations of VT with methamphetamine use, tobacco use, and cognitive performance were tested.
RESULTS: MUD participants did not differ from controls in global or regional VT, and measures of methamphetamine use were not correlated with VT. VT was significantly higher globally in nonsmoking vs smoking participants (main effect, P = .0041). MUD participants showed nonsignificant weakness on the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Task and the Stroop test vs controls (P = .08 and P = .13, respectively) with moderate to large effect sizes, and significantly underperformed controls on the Spatial Capacity Delayed Response Test (P = .015). Across groups, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Task performance correlated with VT in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and superior frontal gyrus.
CONCLUSIONS: Abstinent MUD patients show no evidence of mGlu5 downregulation in brain, but association of VT in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex with verbal learning suggests that medications that target mGlu5 may improve cognitive performance.

BACKGROUND: In the U.S., overdose deaths and substance treatment admissions related to methamphetamine are rising. This study aims to measure and compare U.S. temporal trends in methamphetamine-involved psychiatric hospitalizations.
METHODS: We conducted a population-based, trend analysis of U.S. psychiatric hospitalizations and calculated quarterly (Q) rates per 100,000 population of substance-involved psychiatric hospitalizations. We assessed U.S. regional quarterly percentage hospitalization rate changes using Joinpoint regression.
RESULTS: From Q4 2015-Q4 2019, there were 963,202 psychiatric hospitalizations, 50,223 (5.2 %) involved methamphetamine and 102,877 (10.7 %) involved opioids and/or cocaine without methamphetamine. Methamphetamine-involved psychiatric hospitalization rates increased by 68.0 %, psychiatric hospitalizations rates involving opioid and/or cocaine without methamphetamine decreased by 22 %, while nonsubstance-involved psychiatric hospitalizations rates remained unchanged. The largest significant increases in methamphetamine-involved psychiatric hospitalization rates were among people >61 years old, males, and Midwesterners. Methamphetamine-involved psychiatric hospitalization rates doubled among Black patients. The largest average percent increase among methamphetamine-involved psychiatric hospitalizations was 10.2 % from Q4 2015-Q2 2017 in the Midwest.
CONCLUSIONS: Most psychiatric hospitalizations did not involve substances. Methamphetamine-involved psychiatric hospitalizations greatly increased while opioid-involved psychiatric hospitalizations decreased, but involved more total encounters. Greater access to harm reduction services, contingency management programs, and mental health services is urgently needed.

BACKGROUND: Treatment for methamphetamine and other stimulants can be effective but treatment attrition and continued use are very high. Abstinence is the conventional outcome used to evaluate treatment success, but defining treatment success in this way misses opportunities to promote improved health even when abstinence is not achieved. Reducing methamphetamine and stimulant use without abstinence is associated with many positive outcomes. However, little is known about drug use patterns during treatment or trends in use over time.
METHODS: We used the Treatment Episode Dataset-Discharges (TEDS-D) to identify treatment episodes that had a stimulant drug indicated as the primary substance of use (2017-2021; N=251,841; methamphetamine, cocaine, other amphetamines, or other stimulants). Our outcome was the change in the frequency of drug use between admission and discharge (decreased use with abstinence, decreased use without abstinence, increased use). We used multiple logistic regression to model a change in drug use frequency, predicted by year, stimulant type, and their interaction.
RESULTS: Nearly two-thirds of the sample (60 %) had methamphetamine indicated as the primary stimulant of use. There was a decrease in the predicted rate of abstinence over time and worsening trends were strongest among those using methamphetamine. Daily and periodic drug use at both admission and discharge (no change in use) became worse over time, particularly for those using methamphetamine.
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment outcomes worsened over time and declined fastest among those reporting methamphetamine. Abstinence was rare and most treatment clients did not change their drug use behavior. We recommend a renewed focus on evidence-based harm reduction while the nation\'s treatment systems continue grappling with the stimulant crises.