American Indian Or Alaska Native

美洲印第安人或阿拉斯加原住民
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:了解关键线人专家对美国印第安人和阿拉斯加土著女性的食物不安全与降低妊娠期糖尿病风险行为之间关系的观点。
    方法:参与者是美国部落社区(N=58)中具有食品/营养和健康专业知识的成人关键信息提供者。使用半结构化主持人指南通过1:1访谈收集数据,并使用主题内容分析方法进行分析。
    结果:三个主题包括:(1)饮食和营养习惯是通过代际食物偏好形成的,并受到殖民的持久影响;(2)年轻人受到同龄人饮食和食物环境的影响,(3)父母研究中用于了解家庭食物不安全和营养习惯的方法可能有限。
    结论:研究结果为营养教育和干预措施在哪些方面可以最好地支持年轻的土著女性提供了指导。
    OBJECTIVE: To understand the perspectives of key informant experts regarding the relationship between food insecurity and gestational diabetes mellitus risk reduction behaviors among young American Indian and Alaska Native females.
    METHODS: Participants were adult key informants with expertise in food/nutrition and health within Tribal communities (N = 58) across the US. Data were collected through 1:1 interviews using a semistructured moderator guide and analyzed using thematic content analysis methods.
    RESULTS: Three themes included (1) diet and nutrition habits are formed through intergenerational food preferences and are driven by lasting implications of colonization; (2) young people are influenced by what their peers eat and the food environment, including outside of the home; and (3) the methods used to understand household food insecurity and nutrition habits in the parent study were likely limited.
    CONCLUSIONS: Findings provide guidance as to where nutrition education and interventions may best support young Native females.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    与白人相比,美国的美洲印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民(AI/AN)在慢性呼吸道疾病方面存在差异。使用行为危险因素监测系统(BRFSS)数据,我们之前的研究表明,在BRFSS定义的11个州的一个子集中,AI/AN种族/民族变量与哮喘和/或慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)无关,历史上被认为AI/AN居民比例相对较高.这里,我们调查了AI/AN变量和其他社会人口统计学决定因素对美国其余39个州和地区疾病差异的贡献.使用2011年至2019年的BRFSS调查,我们证明了无论种族如何,39个州的哮喘和/或COPD的年校正患病率高于11个州.Logistic回归分析显示,在调整社会人口统计学协变量后,AI/AN种族/种族变量与39州地区的疾病呈正相关,与11州地区不同。这表明哮喘和/或COPD的疾病患病率和差异的分布在美国是不均匀的。尽管AI/AN人群在美国各地都经历过这种疾病差异,AI/AN变量仅在39个州的区域中被观察到导致这种差异.在制定消除差异政策时,考虑呼吸系统健康决定因素的地理分布和对AI/AN疾病差异有独特影响的因素可能很重要。
    American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) persons in the US experience a disparity in chronic respiratory diseases compared to white persons. Using Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) data, we previously showed that the AI/AN race/ethnicity variable was not associated with asthma and/or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in a BRFSS-defined subset of 11 states historically recognized as having a relatively high proportion of AI/AN residents. Here, we investigate the contributions of the AI/AN variable and other sociodemographic determinants to disease disparity in the remaining 39 US states and territories. Using BRFSS surveys from 2011 to 2019, we demonstrate that irrespective of race, the yearly adjusted prevalence for asthma and/or COPD was higher in the 39-state region than in the 11-state region. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the AI/AN race/ethnicity variable was positively associated with disease in the 39-state region after adjusting for sociodemographic covariates, unlike in the 11-state region. This shows that the distribution of disease prevalence and disparity for asthma and/or COPD is non-uniform in the US. Although AI/AN populations experience this disease disparity throughout the US, the AI/AN variable was only observed to contribute to this disparity in the 39-state region. It may be important to consider the geographical distribution of respiratory health determinants and factors uniquely impactful for AI/AN disease disparity when formulating disparity elimination policies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本来文介绍了通过部落隶属关系和案例地址相结合来定义部落健康管辖权的结果。
    方法:通过县-部落伙伴关系,通过识别2019年12月30日至2022年12月31日COVID-19病例记录(n=374,653)和2020年12月1日至2023年4月18日COVID-19疫苗接种记录(n=2,355,058)的县提取物中的保留地址,使用GIS软件和自定义代码从县数据中提取部落数据。
    结果:该工具确定的病例记录数量是仅通过部落隶属关系过滤的1.91倍,疫苗接种记录数量是3.76倍。
    结论:这种通过患者地址识别社区的方法,结合部落归属和登记,可以帮助部落卫生管辖区实现对公共卫生数据的公平访问,与数据共享协议合作完成时。这种方法对公共卫生和临床研究中代表性不足的其他人群具有潜在的应用价值。
    OBJECTIVE: This communication presents the results of defining a tribal health jurisdiction by a combination of tribal affiliation and case address.
    METHODS: Through a county-tribal partnership, GIS software and custom code were used to extract tribal data from county data by identifying reservation addresses in county extracts of COVID-19 case records from December 30, 2019, to December 31, 2022 (n = 374,653) and COVID-19 vaccination records from December 1, 2020, to April 18, 2023 (n = 2,355,058).
    RESULTS: The tool identified 1.91 times as many case records and 3.76 times as many vaccination records as filtering by tribal affiliation alone.
    CONCLUSIONS: This method of identifying communities by patient address, in combination with tribal affiliation and enrollment, can help tribal health jurisdictions attain equitable access to public health data, when done in partnership with a data sharing agreement. This methodology has potential applications for other populations underrepresented in public health and clinical research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:老年人抑郁症是一个紧迫的公共卫生问题,需要准确的评估工具。老年抑郁量表(GDS)提供了一个简短而有效的筛查抑郁症状的方法,然而,它在民族种族群体中的表现仍然被低估。这项研究旨在比较各种简短形式的GDS检测抑郁症状的能力,并评估白人之间症状认可的潜在种族差异,黑人/非裔美国人,和美洲印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民老年人。
    方法:数据来自威斯康星州阿尔茨海默病研究中心(ADRC)临床队列,由555名有痴呆症风险的认知健康个体组成。我们使用参与者的基线数据进行横断面分析。使用多种简短形式的GDS评估抑郁症状,来自系统评价和荟萃分析。我们检查了内部一致性和与全球临床痴呆评分(CDR)评分的相关性。我们进行了Kruskal-Wallis测试和事后成对比较,以评估症状认可的种族种族差异。
    结果:描述性统计数据显示,女性和白人参与者占主导地位,黑人和美洲印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民群体的显着代表。所有GDS版本都表现出中等到高的内部一致性。在GDS评分和全局CDR评分之间观察到显著正相关。抑郁症状认可的民族种族差异很明显,Black参与者在大多数GDS版本中始终报告更高水平的症状。然而,在一个GDS版本中,美洲印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民参与者认可的症状明显少于黑人参与者。
    结论:该研究强调了在评估老年人时考虑抑郁症状的种族差异的重要性。虽然GDS显示出整体可靠性,不同种族群体的症状认可差异强调了对文化敏感的评估工具和干预措施的必要性。未来的研究应该进一步探索这些群体差异,并开发针对不同老年人群的抑郁症筛查和治疗方法。
    BACKGROUND: Depression among older adults is a pressing public health concern, necessitating accurate assessment tools. The Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) offers a brief and efficient means of screening depressive symptoms, yet its performance across ethno-racial groups remains understudied. This study aimed to compare the ability of various brief forms of the GDS to detect depressive symptoms and to assess potential ethno-racial differences in symptom endorsement among White, Black/African-American, and American Indian/Alaska Native older adults.
    METHODS: Data were obtained from the Wisconsin Alzheimer\'s Disease Research Center (ADRC) clinical cohort, comprising 555 cognitively healthy individuals at risk for dementia. We used participants\' baseline data for this cross-sectional analysis. Depressive symptoms were assessed using multiple brief forms of the GDS, derived from a systematic review and meta-analysis. We examined internal consistency and correlations with global Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scores. We conducted Kruskal-Wallis tests and post hoc pairwise comparisons to assess ethno-racial group differences in symptom endorsement.
    RESULTS: Descriptive statistics revealed a predominance of female and White participants, with notable representation from Black and American Indian/Alaska Native groups. All GDS versions demonstrated moderate to high internal consistency. Significant positive correlations were observed between GDS scores and global CDR scores. Ethno-racial group differences in depressive symptom endorsement were evident, with Black participants consistently reporting higher levels of symptoms across most GDS versions. However, American Indian/Alaska Native participants endorsed significantly fewer symptoms than Black participants in one GDS version.
    CONCLUSIONS: The study highlights the importance of considering ethno-racial differences in depressive symptomatology when assessing older adults. While the GDS demonstrates overall reliability, variations in symptom endorsement across different ethno-racial groups underscore the need for culturally sensitive assessment tools and interventions. Future research should further explore these group differences and develop tailored approaches to depression screening and treatment in diverse older adult populations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:在COVID-19大流行的第二年,研究司法参与状况对非老年人院内死亡率的影响。
    方法:这项回顾性队列研究使用了来自美国20个州的2021个州住院数据库(SID)的数据,其中包括住院至少24小时的18-64岁成年人从普通急性护理医院出院.主要结果是全因住院死亡率,主要比较是司法参与状况。我们使用逻辑回归估计优势比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI),随着社会人口因素的调整,Elixhauser合并症,COVID-19诊断,入院敏锐度,其他临床特征,大都市区和季节性。我们将数据随机分成50%的训练和50%的验证集。对于后者,我们评估了我们最终模型的性能。
    结果:研究人群包括4,712,441例出院(1.1%涉及司法;平均[SD]年龄47.5[12.8]岁;47.0%的女性;63.6%的白人,21.8%黑色,11.8%西班牙裔,1.8%亚洲/太平洋岛民[API],和1.0%美洲印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民[AIAN])。其中,发生102,735例住院死亡(2.2%)。在多变量分析中,在涉及司法的患者中,院内死亡率降低约40%(OR0.6,95%CI0.5~0.7,P值<0.01).最终验证的模型显示出出色的区分(受试者操作员特征0.953,95CI0.952至0.954的曲线下面积[AUC])和良好的校准(Brier评分0.014,校准带P值0.186)。
    结论:在这项队列研究中,司法参与状态与较低的住院死亡率独立相关.未来的研究应该检查入院前和出院后的结果。
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this research is to examine the role of justice-involved status on in-hospital mortality among nonelderly adults during the second year of the COVID-19 pandemic.
    METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used data from the 2021 State Inpatient Databases for 20 US states, which included discharges from general acute care hospitals among adults aged 18-64 years hospitalized for at least 24 hours. The main outcome was all-cause in-hospital mortality and the primary comparison was justice-involved status. We used logistic regression to estimate the odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), with adjustment for sociodemographic factors, Elixhauser comorbidities, COVID-19 diagnosis, admission acuity, other clinical features, metropolitan area, and seasonality. We randomly split the data into a 50% training and 50% validation set. With the latter, we evaluated the performance of our final model.
    RESULTS: The study population included 4,712,441 discharges (1.1% justice-involved; mean [SD] age 47.5 [12.8] years; 47.0% women; 63.6% White, 21.8% Black, 11.8% Hispanic, 1.8% Asian/Pacific Islander, and 1.0% American Indian/Alaska Native). Among these, 102,735 in-hospital deaths (2.2%) occurred. In the multivariate analysis, in-hospital mortality was about 40% less likely among justice-involved patients (odds ratios 0.6, 95% CI 0.5-0.7, P value <0.01). The final validated model showed excellent discrimination (area under the curve for the receiver operator characteristic 0.953, 95% CI 0.952-0.954) and good calibration (Brier score 0.014, calibration belt P value .186).
    CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort study, justice-involved status was independently associated with lower in-hospital mortality. Future studies should examine preadmission and postdischarge outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:阿尔茨海默病是最常见的痴呆类型,占痴呆诊断的80%,是美国第六大死亡原因。到2020年,估计有38,000名年龄≥65岁的美洲印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民(AI/AN)患有阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆症(ADRD),预计到2030年将翻一番,到2050年将翻两番。来自印度卫生服务(IHS)的行政医疗数据用于估计AI/AN人群中的ADRD。
    方法:来自IHS国家数据仓库的2016至2020年联邦财政年度的管理IHS医疗保健数据用于计算每100,000名≥45岁的AI/AN成年人的计数和比率,其中至少有一个ADRD诊断代码。
    结果:这项研究确定了12,877名年龄≥45岁的AI/AN成年人,其诊断代码为ADRD,总体比率为514/10万。其中,1856人年龄在45-64岁之间。女性使用ADRD诊断代码进行医疗访问的可能性是男性的1.2倍(95%置信区间:1.1-1.2)。
    结论:许多患有ADRD的AI/AN人依赖IHS,部落,和印度城市健康计划。利用IHS卫生服务的45-64岁的AI/AN人群的ADRD负担很高,这凸显了在年轻AI/AN人群中实施ADRD风险降低策略以及评估和诊断ADRD的必要性。这项研究为评估AI/AN社区解决ADRD的未来进展提供了基线。
    BACKGROUND: Alzheimer\'s disease is the most common type of dementia and is responsible for up to 80% of dementia diagnoses and is the sixth leading cause of death in the United States. An estimated 38,000 American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) people aged ≥65 years were living with Alzheimer\'s disease and related dementias (ADRD) in 2020, a number expected to double by 2030 and quadruple by 2050. Administrative healthcare data from the Indian Health Service (IHS) were used to estimate ADRD among AI/AN populations.
    METHODS: Administrative IHS healthcare data from federal fiscal years 2016 to 2020 from the IHS National Data Warehouse were used to calculate the count and rate per 100,000 AI/AN adults aged ≥45 years with at least one ADRD diagnosis code on their medical record.
    RESULTS: This study identified 12,877 AI/AN adults aged ≥45 years with an ADRD diagnosis code, with an overall rate of 514 per 100,000. Of those, 1856 people were aged 45-64. Females were 1.2 times (95% confidence interval: 1.1-1.2) more likely than males to have a medical visit with an ADRD diagnosis code.
    CONCLUSIONS: Many AI/AN people with ADRD rely on IHS, tribal, and urban Indian health programs. The high burden of ADRD in AI/AN populations aged 45-64 utilizing IHS health services highlights the need for implementation of ADRD risk reduction strategies and assessment and diagnosis of ADRD in younger AI/AN populations. This study provides a baseline to assess future progress for efforts addressing ADRD in AI/AN communities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    加强社会支持和联系可以降低自杀风险,然而,很少有研究在美洲印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民(AI/AN)成年人中检查这种影响。我们评估了自杀意念和行为,受挫的归属感,社会支持,养成文化,历史创伤,来自五个AI/AN社区的709名具有自杀风险的AI/AN成年人的创伤性生活事件。自杀意念与受挫的归属感有关,并受到社会支持和参与AI/AN仪式的保护。在那些终生自杀未遂的人中,创伤性生活事件,由于历史创伤引起的抑郁/焦虑症状,受挫的归属感与更多的尝试有关。更多地参与文化习俗与更少的自杀企图有关。更高水平的社会支持与更多的自杀企图有关,这可能归因于研究的横断面性质。干预措施应侧重于保护因素和针对特定环境的干预措施,强调社区历史,值,和优势。
    Enhancing social support and connectedness can reduce suicide risk, yet few studies have examined this effect in American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) adults. We assessed suicidal ideation and behavior, thwarted belongingness, social support, enculturation, historical trauma, and traumatic life events in 709 AI/AN adults at high risk of suicide from five AI/AN communities. Suicidal ideation was associated with thwarted belongingness and protected against by social support and engaging in AI/AN ceremonies. Among those who made lifetime suicide attempts, traumatic life events, symptoms of depression/anxiety due to historical trauma, and thwarted belongingness were linked to more attempts. More engagement in cultural practices was associated with fewer suicide attempts. Higher levels of social support were associated with more suicide attempts, an observation potentially attributable to the cross-sectional nature of the study. Interventions should focus on protective factors and context-specific interventions emphasizing community history, values, and strengths.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: News
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号