vasectomy

输精管切除术
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对于胚胎移植受体的准备,通常使用手术切除血管的小鼠,由与疼痛和不适相关的程序产生的。无菌转基因菌株提供了非手术替代,但是它们的维持需要育种和基因分型程序。我们以前曾报道过使用自然不育的STUSB6F1杂种来生产胚胎移植受体,并发现这些受体的行为与输精管切除的雄性产生的行为难以区分。该方法提供了两个实质性的3R影响:细化(与手术输精管切除术相比)和育种程序的减少(与无菌转基因品系相比)。尽管最初的承诺,这种创新的3Rs影响受到亲本STUS/Fore菌株育种困难的限制,这排除了无菌杂种的更广泛分布。3R倡议的价值仅与社区的吸收一样好。在这里,我们,因此,选择不同的自然不育杂种,从广泛可用的菌株产生:C57BL/6J和Musspretus之间的B6SPRTF1杂种。我们首先通过精子计数和睾丸重量确认了其不育性,然后在三个英国设施中尝试了冷冻保存的胚胎和种质的回收。发现通过体外受精产生这些杂种的精子分布是最可靠的分布方法,并且避免了维持活的M.spretus菌落的需要。然后,我们在这三个相同的UK设施中测试了B6SPRTF1无菌杂种对胚胎移植受体产生的适用性,发现与手术输精管切除小鼠和无菌转基因菌株相比,这些杂种是合适的。总之,该方法的潜在3Rs影响通过在独立生产设施中的无菌B6SPRTF1杂种的分布和实用性得到证实.
    For the preparation of embryo transfer recipients, surgically vasectomized mice are commonly used, generated by procedures associated with pain and discomfort. Sterile transgenic strains provide a nonsurgical replacement, but their maintenance requires breeding and genotyping procedures. We have previously reported the use of naturally sterile STUSB6F1 hybrids for the production of embryo transfer recipients and found the behavior of these recipients to be indistinguishable from those generated by vasectomized males. The method provides two substantial 3R impacts: refinement (when compared with surgical vasectomy) and reduction in breeding procedures (compared with sterile transgenic lines). Despite initial promise, the 3Rs impact of this innovation was limited by difficulties in breeding the parental STUS/Fore strain, which precluded the wider distribution of the sterile hybrid. The value of a 3R initiative is only as good as the uptake in the community. Here we, thus, select a different naturally sterile hybrid, generated from strains that are widely available: the B6SPRTF1 hybrid between C57BL/6J and Mus spretus. We first confirmed its sterility by sperm counting and testes weight and then trialed the recovery of cryopreserved embryos and germplasm within three UK facilities. Distribution of sperm for the generation of these hybrids by in vitro fertilization was found to be the most robust distribution method and avoided the need to maintain a live M. spretus colony. We then tested the suitability of B6SPRTF1 sterile hybrids for the generation of embryo transfer recipients at these same three UK facilities and found the hybrids to be suitable when compared with surgical vasectomized mice and a sterile transgenic strain. In conclusion, the potential 3Rs impact of this method was confirmed by the ease of distribution and the utility of sterile B6SPRTF1 hybrids at independent production facilities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    最高法院裁定多布斯诉杰克逊妇女卫生组织(2022年6月)推翻了联邦对堕胎权的保护,对男女生殖权利和保健服务产生重大影响。我们对2021年6月至2023年6月在单一学术机构接受输精管结扎术的所有患者进行了回顾性审查。我们的目标是比较这项裁决前后1年无子女和无伴侣输精管切除术的比率,因为这些人可能更容易受到程序后遗憾的影响。总计,631名男性(平均年龄=39岁,范围=20-70)接受输精管结扎术咨询。Dobbs前后的输精管切除术总数分别为304(48%)和327(52%)。Dobbs前后的无子女和无伴侣输精管切除术总数分别为44(42%)对61(58%)和43(46%)对50(54%)。输精管结扎率在Dobbs后略有增加(90%vs.88%;p=.240)。后Dobbs队列的儿童明显较少(1.8vs.2.0;p=.031)。后多布斯时代的男性更有可能获得商业保险(72%与64%),不太可能没有保险(1%与6%;p=.002)。进行无子女输精管结扎术的男性更年轻(36.4vs.39.8年;p<.001)。与有伴侣的队列相比,无伴侣队列中西班牙裔和黑人男性的比例明显更高(24%vs.19%和9%vs.2%;p=.002)。总之,应就该程序的永久性为患者提供咨询,强调需要有效和可逆的男性避孕。
    The Supreme Court ruling Dobbs v. Jackson Women\'s Health Organization (June 2022) overturned federal protection of abortion rights, resulting in significant impact on both male and female reproductive rights and health care delivery. We conducted a retrospective review of all patients who underwent vasectomy at a single academic institution between June 2021 and June 2023. Our objective was to compare the rates of childless and partnerless vasectomies 1 year before and after this ruling, as these men may be more susceptible to postprocedural regret. Of total, 631 men (median age = 39 years, range = 20-70) underwent vasectomy consultation. Total vasectomies pre- and post-Dobbs were 304 (48%) versus 327 (52%). Total childless and partnerless vasectomies pre- and post-Dobbs were 44 (42%) versus 61 (58%) and 43 (46%) versus 50 (54%). Vasectomy completion rate was slightly increased post-Dobbs (90% vs. 88%; p = .240). The post-Dobbs cohort had significantly less children (1.8 vs. 2.0; p = .031). Men in the post-Dobbs era were significantly more likely to be commercially insured (72% vs. 64%) and less likely to be uninsured (1% vs. 6%; p = .002). Men who underwent childless vasectomy were significantly more likely to be younger (36.4 vs. 39.8 years; p < .001). There was a significantly greater proportion of Hispanic and Black men in the partnerless cohort compared to the cohort with partners (24% vs. 19% and 9% vs. 2%; p = .002). In conclusion, patients should be counseled on the permanent nature of this procedure, underscoring need for effective and reversible male contraception.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    关于输精管切除术的增加或减少的争议正在出现;然而,在拉丁美洲,证据仍然很少。这项生态研究分析了智利10年来的输精管结扎和性传播疾病(STD)趋势,并确定它们之间是否有任何关系。我们使用2008年至2017年输精管切除术和性病病例数的次要和代表性数据进行了混合生态学研究。计算了20-59岁男性的特定年龄段的输精管切除术率,和特定的性病(艾滋病毒,衣原体,淋病,滴虫病,和梅毒)同期。拟合多元负二项回归模型来评估率趋势和关系。平均输精管切除术年龄为40.3岁,研究年份之间没有显着差异(p=0.058)。从2008年到2017年,输精管结扎率显着增加(p<0.001),年龄组之间存在差异(p<0.001)。在30-49岁的男性中观察到最显著的增加(p<0.001)。STD发生率在研究期间显著增加(p<0.05)。输精管结扎术和淋病发病率之间存在显着正相关(p=0.008),与乙型肝炎发病率呈负相关(p=0.002)。从2018年到2017年,智利的输精管结扎趋势和性病发病率显着增加。尤其是30-49岁的男性。输精管结扎术与性病增加之间的关系为生殖和性健康政策提供了新的风险因素,以帮助控制艾滋病毒和性病的流行。
    A controversy about the increase or decline of vasectomy is emerging; however, the evidence is still scarce in Latin America. This ecological study analyzed the vasectomy and sexual transmitted diseases (STD) trends over a period of 10 years in Chile and determined if there is any relationship between them. We conducted a mixed ecological study using secondary and representative data on the number of vasectomies and STD cases from 2008 to 2017. Vasectomy rates were calculated for age-specific groups of men aged 20-59 years, and specific STD (HIV, chlamydia, gonorrhea, trichomoniasis, and syphilis) for the same period. Multivariate negative binomial regression models were fitted to evaluate rate trends and relationships. The mean vasectomy age was 40.3 years, with no significant differences between the years of the study (p = 0.058). The overall vasectomy rate significantly increased from 2008 to 2017 (p < 0.001), with differences between age groups (p < 0.001). The most significant increase was observed in men aged 30-49 (p < 0.001). The STD rates significantly increased (p < 0.05) during the study period. A significant positive correlation was found between vasectomy and gonorrhea incidence rates (p = 0.008) and an inverse correlation was found with hepatitis B incidence rates (p = 0.002). Vasectomy trends and STD rates significantly increased from 2018 to 2017 in Chile. especially among men aged 30-49 years. The relationship between vasectomy and STD increments suggests a new risk factor for reproductive and sexual health policies to aid controlling the HIV and STD epidemic.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    输精管结扎后精液分析(PVSA)完成率低,尽量减少额外的面对面访问的需要可能会提高合规性。我们假设在输精管结扎术时而不是在术后预约时提供PVSA标本杯可能与更高的PVSA完成率相关。
    我们在2016年10月至2022年6月期间,使用单一提供者进行输精管结扎术咨询的所有患者的病历,进行了一项具有历史对照的回顾性队列研究。包括所有接受输精管结扎术的患者。在2020年5月1日之前接受输精管切除术的患者在输精管切除术后两周的术后预约时给予PVSA标本杯,2020-05-01后进行输精管结扎术的患者在输精管结扎术时给予PVSA标本杯。PVSA完成,人口统计学,并收集临床结局数据.逻辑回归用于研究PVSA完成率与PVSA标本杯提供时间之间的关联。
    在所有患者人口统计学分析中,研究队列之间没有显着差异,包括年龄,体重指数(BMI),主要伴侣的年龄,儿童的存在,和既往泌尿生殖系统感染史。2016年10月至2022年6月期间,共有491例患者接受输精管结扎咨询;在这些患者中,370人接受了输精管切除术。其中,173例(46.8%)患者在2020年5月1日之前接受了输精管切除术,并在术后访视时给予了PVSA标本杯;197例(53.2%)患者在2020年5月1日之后接受了输精管切除术,并在输精管切除术时给予了PVSA标本杯。在输精管切除术时提供PVSA标本杯比在术后就诊时提供PVSA标本杯具有更高的PVSA完成几率[62.4%vs.49.7%;比值比(OR)=1.68;95%置信区间(CI):1.11,2.55]。对所有确定的混杂因素进行调整排除了35例(9.5%)没有主要伴侣的患者,并且在杯赛时间上没有统计学上的显着关联[调整后的OR(aOR)=1.53;95%CI:0.98,2.39]。调整除主要伴侣年龄外的所有已确定的混杂因素,显示输精管结扎术时提供标本杯的时机与更高的PVSA完成几率相关(aOR=1.64;95%CI:1.08,2.52)。
    在这项回顾性队列研究中,在输精管结扎术时与在术后预约时提供的PVSA标本杯与更高的PVSA完成率相关。
    UNASSIGNED: Post-vasectomy semen analysis (PVSA) completion rates after vasectomy are poor, and minimizing the need for an additional in-person visit may improve compliance. We hypothesized that providing PVSA specimen cup at time of vasectomy instead of at a postoperative appointment might be associated with higher PVSA completion rates.
    UNASSIGNED: We performed a retrospective cohort study with historical control using medical records of all patients seen by a single provider for vasectomy consultation between October 2016 and June 2022. All patients who underwent vasectomy were included. Patients who underwent vasectomy prior to 05/01/2020 had PVSA specimen cup given at postoperative appointment two weeks following vasectomy, and those who underwent vasectomy after 05/01/2020 were given PVSA specimen cup at time of vasectomy. PVSA completion, demographic, and clinical outcomes data were collected. Logistic regressions were used to investigate associations between PVSA completion rates and timing of PVSA specimen cup provision.
    UNASSIGNED: There were no significant differences among study cohorts across all patient demographics analyzed, including age, body mass index (BMI), age of primary partner, presence of children, and history of prior genitourinary infection. A total of 491 patients were seen for vasectomy consultation between October 2016 and June 2022; among these patients, 370 underwent vasectomy. Of these, 173 (46.8%) patients underwent vasectomy prior to 05/01/2020 and were given PVSA specimen cup at postoperative visit; 197 (53.2%) patients underwent vasectomy after 05/01/2020 and were given PVSA specimen cup at vasectomy. Providing PVSA specimen cup at time of vasectomy was associated with higher odds of PVSA completion than providing PVSA specimen cup at postoperative visit [62.4% vs. 49.7%; odds ratio (OR) =1.68; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.11, 2.55]. Adjusting for all identified confounders excludes 35 (9.5%) patients without a primary partner and shows no statistically significant association in cup timing [adjusted OR (aOR) =1.53; 95% CI: 0.98, 2.39]. Adjusting for all identified confounders except age of primary partner revealed timing of specimen cup provision at time of vasectomy was associated with higher odds of PVSA completion (aOR =1.64; 95% CI: 1.08, 2.52).
    UNASSIGNED: PVSA specimen cup provision at time of vasectomy versus at postoperative appointment is associated with higher rates of PVSA completion in this retrospective cohort study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    男性绝育,或者输精管切除术,在预防怀孕方面的有效率为99.9%,并发症的风险低于2%。尽管疗效很高,低风险,低成本,和输精管切除术的性别平等利益,2019年,全球只有2%的女性报告说,她们和她们的伴侣依靠输精管结扎术作为避孕方法.一般情况下,医疗保健提供者既可以促进男性健康,也可以成为男性健康的障碍,也可能在输精管切除术中。这项研究旨在描述经验丰富的输精管切除术提供者在评估复杂病例中的患者候选人资格时的决策依据。
    来自七个国家/地区的全球输精管切除术网络Google小组的15个输精管切除术提供商使用半结构化深度访谈指南参加了在线访谈。供应商被问及他们的输精管切除术培训,他们提供输精管切除术的原因,他们面临的具有挑战性的案例,以及用于管理具有挑战性的案例的方法。小插图被用来进一步引出决策理由。使用MAXQDA20进行主题分析。
    提供者的决策是基于确保患者了解情况,能够同意,并确定他们选择进行输精管结扎术。一旦这些基本条件得到满足,提供者通过他们的培训过滤了患者的特征,法律和政策,社会文化规范,经验,和同行影响,以产生成本效益分解。根据成本效益分析,在确定输精管结扎术患者的候选资格时,提供者决定是否更加权衡自主性或非恶意.
    尽管临床最佳实践促进患者自主性优先于非恶意治疗,在输精管结扎术患者的候选资格评估中,一些提供者继续权衡非恶意而非自主性.在提供者被认为后悔风险较高的情况下,非恶意行为尤其优先。这项研究的结果表明,输精管结扎术提供者的培训应强调在共同决策和以患者为中心的护理中基于证据的最佳实践,以促进输精管结扎术的规定,以尊重患者的自主权和权利。
    UNASSIGNED: Male sterilization, or vasectomy, is 99.9% effective at preventing pregnancy with less than a 2% risk of complications. Despite the high efficacy, low risk, low cost, and gender equity benefits of vasectomy, just 2% of women reported that they and their partners relied on vasectomy as their contraceptive method globally in 2019. Health care providers can be both a facilitator and a barrier in men\'s health generally, and may be in vasectomy provision as well. This study sought to describe the decision-making rationales of experienced vasectomy providers when evaluating patient candidacy in complex cases.
    UNASSIGNED: Fifteen vasectomy providers belonging to the global Vasectomy Network google group from seven countries participated in online interviews using a semi-structured in-depth interview guide. Providers were asked about their vasectomy training, their reasons for vasectomy provision, challenging cases they have faced, and approaches used to manage challenging cases. Vignettes were used to further elicit decision-making rationale. Thematic analysis was conducted using MAXQDA20.
    UNASSIGNED: Provider decision-making was predicated on ensuring patients were well-informed, able to consent, and certain about their choice to have a vasectomy. Once those foundational conditions were met, providers filtered patient characteristics through their training, laws and policies, sociocultural norms, experience, and peer influence to produce a cost-benefit breakdown. Based on the cost-benefit analysis, providers determined whether to weigh autonomy or non-maleficence more heavily when determining vasectomy patient candidacy.
    UNASSIGNED: Despite clinical best practices that promote prioritizing patient autonomy over non-maleficence, some providers continued to weigh non-maleficence over autonomy in vasectomy patient candidacy evaluations. Non-maleficence was particularly prioritized in cases providers deemed to be at higher risk of regret. The findings of this study suggest vasectomy provider training should emphasize evidence-based best practices in shared decision-making and patient-centered care to facilitate vasectomy provision that honors patient autonomy and rights.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:使用经过验证的可读性和质量评估工具评估输精管结扎术在线健康信息的质量和可读性。
    方法:Google上“输精管切除术”的前50个搜索结果,宾,雅虎被选中。重复链接,广告,博客文章,付费网页,并排除了提供给医疗服务提供者的信息.Flesch阅读轻松得分,Flesch-Kincaid等级,GunningFogIndex,和简单测量的Gobbledygook(SMOG)指数用于评估可读性,在线健康信息的最佳可读性水平被确立为六年级阅读水平。DISCERNInstrument和JAMABenchmark用于评估选定网页的质量。分析了网页类型的评估间得分相关性和结果。
    结果:我们分析了44个网页,包括16名学术人员,5医院附属,6商业、13非营利健康宣传,和4个未分类的来源。通过FleschKincaid评估工具测量,评估网页的平均可读性处于10年级阅读水平,以及根据SMOG和GunningFog指数的本科阅读水平。非营利性健康宣传网页的阅读水平最好,但仍未达到6至7年级的建议水平。网页的整体质量是“公平”,非营利性健康宣传页面表现最好。
    结论:评估的网页提供了输精管切除术的教育,其语言过于复杂,一般人群无法理解。此外,几个在线健康信息来源,例如非营利组织,学术机构的表现优于网页。为了解决这些缺点并在患者之间建立信任以提高输精管切除术的利用率并减少决策遗憾,必须增加医疗保健协作并致力于生产高质量的在线患者资源。
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the quality and readability of online health information on vasectomy using validated readability and quality assessment tools.
    METHODS: The top 50 search results for \"vasectomy\" on Google, Bing, and Yahoo were selected. Duplicate links, advertisements, blog posts, paid webpages, and information intended for healthcare providers were excluded. Flesch Reading Ease score, Flesch-Kincaid Grade level, Gunning Fog Index, and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) index were used to assess readability, with optimal readability level for online health information established as being at sixth grade reading level. DISCERN Instrument and JAMA Benchmark were used to assess the quality of selected webpages. Inter-assessment score correlation and results by webpage type were analyzed.
    RESULTS: We analyzed 44 webpages, including 16 academic, 5 hospital-affiliated, 6 commercial, 13 non-profit health advocacy, and 4 uncategorized sources. The average readability of the evaluated webpages was at a 10th grade reading level as measured by the Flesch Kincaid Assessment tool, and an undergraduate reading level per the SMOG and Gunning Fog indices. Non-profit health advocacy webpages had the best reading level but still was not at the recommended level of grade 6 to 7. The overall DISCERN quality of the webpages was \"fair\", with non-profit health advocacy pages performing best.
    CONCLUSIONS: The assessed webpages offer education on vasectomy in a language that is too complex for the general population to understand. Furthermore, several sources for online health information, such as non-profits, outperformed webpages by academic institutions. Increased healthcare collaboration and dedication to producing quality online patient resources is necessary to address these shortcomings and build trust among patients to increase utilization of vasectomy and decrease decisional regret.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    输精管结扎术是男性绝育的一种外科手术。这是日常泌尿外科实践中非常常见的手术,并发症发生率低。血肿形成,伤口感染,慢性阴囊疼痛,和自发再通是众所周知的并发症。输精管切除术后瘘形成和睾丸梗塞较少见。在本文中,我们提供了有关输精管结扎术后罕见并发症的文献综述。
    对PubMedMedline和WebofScienceCoreCollection数据库进行了手动电子搜索,包括所有纳入的报告,直到2022年9月30日,以确定评估输精管结扎术后患者并发症的研究。
    尿道血管皮肤瘘是迄今为止最普遍的,而血管皮肤,血管静脉,很少报道动静脉瘘。在排出瘘管时,可以进行流体分析以区分不同的类型。在所有情况下,都进行了阴囊探查和瘘管结扎。如果存在,应治疗潜在的膀胱出口梗阻。阴囊梗塞是输精管结扎术的另一种罕见并发症。通过阴囊超声和彩色多普勒进行诊断。治疗通常是保守的,但对于较大的梗死应考虑睾丸切除术。简单的伤口感染在输精管切除术后的患者中很常见。更复杂的感染很少见,但可能导致严重甚至致命的并发症。
    输精管切除术后的常见并发症是众所周知的,通常与患者进行充分讨论。然而,可能会出现罕见的并发症,重要的是它们被临床医生认可。
    UNASSIGNED: Vasectomy is a surgical procedure for male sterilization. It is a very common procedure in daily urological practice with a low complication rate. Haematoma formation, wound infection, chronic scrotal pain, and spontaneous recanalization are well-known complications. Fistula formation and testicular infarction are less common following a vasectomy. In this article we provide a review of literature regarding rare complications after vasectomy.
    UNASSIGNED: A manual electronic search of the PubMed Medline and Web of Science Core Collection databases was performed encompassing all included reports until 30 September 2022 to identify studies that assessed patient complications after a vasectomy.
    UNASSIGNED: Urethrovasocutaneous fistulas are by far the most prevalent, while vasocutaneous, vasovenous, and arteriovenous fistulas are seldom reported. In discharging fistulas, a fluid analysis can be done to discriminate different types. In all cases scrotal exploration and ligation of the fistula was performed. If present, an underlying bladder outlet obstruction should be treated. Scrotal infarction is another infrequently reported complication of vasectomy. Diagnosis is made by scrotal ultrasound and colour Doppler. Treatment is usually conservative, but orchiectomy should be considered in larger infarctions. Simple wound infections are common in patients post vasectomy. More complex infections are rare but can result in serious and even fatal complications.
    UNASSIGNED: Common complications after vasectomy are well known and usually well discussed with patients. However, rare complications can occur, and it is important that they are recognized by clinicians.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估各种环境下以及各种手术技术和消毒方法中输精管切除术后感染的风险。
    方法:回顾性回顾加拿大使用无手术刀输精管结扎术(NSV)技术的来自四个大型实践/实践网络的133,044例输精管切除术患者的记录(2011-2021),哥伦比亚(2015-2020),新西兰(2018-2021),和英国(2006-2019年)。我们将感染定义为在输精管结扎术后为生殖器或泌尿系统疾病开的任何抗生素的医疗记录中提及。
    结果:输精管结扎后感染风险为0.8%(219例感染/26,809例),2.1%(390/18,490),1.0%(100/10,506),和1.3%(1,007/77,239)在加拿大,哥伦比亚,新西兰,和英国,分别。审核期比较表明,切除短血管段对感染风险的影响有限,在阴囊开口应用局部抗生素,在加拿大戴着口罩,皮肤消毒剂的类型,在新西兰使用非无菌手套。与结扎相比,当使用粘膜烧灼和筋膜插入[FI]进行输精管闭塞时,哥伦比亚的感染风险较低。切除,和FI(0.9%与2.1%,p<0.00001)。接受抗生素治疗的患者中56%至60%的感染确定性水平较低,这表明真正的风险可能被高估了。医疗记录中缺乏信息以及未咨询输精管切除术提供者的患者可能会导致对风险的低估。
    结论:输精管结扎后感染的风险较低,1%左右,在进行NSV和各种闭塞技术的国际高容量输精管结扎术中。除了输精管结扎封堵技术,没有其他因素改变输精管结扎后感染的风险.
    To estimate the risk of post-vasectomy infections in various settings and across various surgical techniques and sanitization practices.
    Retrospective review of the records of 133,044 vasectomized patients from four large practices/network of practices using the no-scalpel vasectomy (NSV) technique in Canada (2011-2021), Colombia (2015-2020), New Zealand (2018-2021), and the United Kingdom (2006-2019). We defined infection as any mention in medical records of any antibiotics prescribed for a genital or urinary condition following vasectomy.
    Post-vasectomy infection risks were 0.8% (219 infections/26,809 procedures), 2.1% (390/18,490), 1.0% (100/10,506), and 1.3% (1,007/77,239) in Canada, Colombia, New Zealand, and the UK, respectively. Audit period comparison suggests a limited effect on the risk of infection of excising a short vas segment, applying topical antibiotic on scrotal opening, wearing a surgical mask in Canada, type of skin disinfectant, and use of non-sterile gloves in New Zealand. Risk of infection was lower in Colombia when mucosal cautery and fascial interposition [FI] were used for vas occlusion compared to ligation, excision, and FI (0.9% vs. 2.1%, p<0.00001). Low level of infection certainty in 56% to 60% of patients who received antibiotics indicates that the true risk might be overestimated. Lack of information in medical records and patients not consulting their vasectomy providers might have led to underestimation of the risk.
    Risk of infection after vasectomy is low, about 1%, among international high-volume vasectomy practices performing NSV and various occlusion techniques. Apart from vasectomy occlusion technique, no other factor modified the risk of post-vasectomy infection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号