This Phase I/IIa open-label, single-arm clinical trial addressing advanced, refractory, metastatic breast cancer was conducted at six medical centers in the United States. We repeated inoculations with irradiated SV-BR-1-GM, a breast cancer cell line with antigen-presenting activity engineered to release granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), with pre-dose low-dose cyclophosphamide and post-dose local interferon alpha. Twenty-six patients were enrolled; 23 (88.5%) were inoculated, receiving a total of 79 inoculations. There were six Grade 4 and one Grade 5 adverse events noted (judged unrelated to SV-BR-1-GM). Disease control (stable disease [SD]) occurred in 8 of 16 evaluable patients; 4 showed objective regression of metastases, including 1 patient with near-complete regressions in 20 of 20 pulmonary lesions. All patients with regressions had human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matches with SV-BR-1-GM; non-responders were equally divided between matching and nonmatching (p = .01, Chi-squared), and having ≥2 HLA matches with SV-BR-1-GM (n = 6) correlated with clinical benefit. Delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) testing to candida antigen and SV-BR-1-GM generated positive responses (≥5 mm) in 11 (42.3%) and 13 (50%) patients, respectively. Quantifying peripheral circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and cancer-associated macrophage-like cells (CAMLs) showed that a drop in CAMLs was significantly correlated with an improvement in progression-free survival (PFS; 4.1 months vs. 1.8 months, p = .0058). Eight of 10 patients significantly upregulated programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) on CTCs/CAMLs with treatment (p = .0012). These observations support the safety of the Bria-IMT regimen, demonstrate clinical regressions, imply a role for HLA matching, and identify a possible value for monitoring CAMLs in peripheral blood.

Immunotherapy has rejuvenated cancer therapy, especially after anti-PD-(L)1 came onto the scene. Among the many therapeutic options, therapeutic cancer vaccines are one of the most essential players. Although great progress has been made in research on tumor antigen vaccines, few phase III trials have shown clinical benefits. One of the reasons lies in obstruction from the tumor microenvironment (TME). Meanwhile, the therapeutic cancer vaccine reshapes the TME in an ambivalent way, leading to immune stimulation or immune escape. In this review, we summarize recent progress on the interaction between therapeutic cancer vaccines and the TME. With respect to vaccine resistance, innate immunosuppressive TME components and acquired resistance caused by vaccination are both involved. Understanding the underlying mechanism of this crosstalk provides insight into the treatment of cancer by directly targeting the TME or synergizing with other therapeutics.

The treatment of unresectable or metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) has traditionally relied on chemotherapy or radiotherapy, yielding suboptimal outcomes. The introduction of immunotherapy has significantly improved HNSCC treatment, even if the long-term results cannot be defined as satisfactory. Its mechanism of action aims to counteract the blockade of tumor immune escape. This result can also be obtained by stimulating the immune system with vaccines. This review scope is to comprehensively gather existing evidence and summarize ongoing clinical trials focused on therapeutic vaccines for HNSCC treatment. The current landscape reveals numerous promising drugs in the early stages of experimentation, along with a multitude of trials that have been suspended or abandoned for years. Nonetheless, there are encouraging results and ongoing experiments that instill hope for potential paradigm shifts in HNSCC therapy.

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a primary brain tumor known for its short survival time, typically 14-18 months from diagnosis to fatality. Managing GBM poses significant challenges due to factors like the formidable blood-brain barrier, the immunosuppressive conditions within GBM, and the intricacies of surgical procedures. Currently, the typical treatment for GBM combines surgical procedures, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy using temozolomide. Unfortunately, this conventional approach has not proven effective in substantially extending the lives of GBM patients. Consequently, researchers are exploring alternative methods for GBM management. One promising avenue receiving attention in recent years is immunotherapy. This approach has successfully treated cancer types like non-small cell lung cancer and blood-related malignancies. Various immunotherapeutic strategies are currently under investigation for GBM treatment, including checkpoint inhibitors, vaccines, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, and oncolytic viruses. A comprehensive review of 26 high-quality studies conducted over the past decade, involving thorough searches of databases such as PubMed and Google Scholar, has been conducted. The findings from this review suggest that while immunotherapeutic strategies show promise, they face significant limitations and challenges in practical application for GBM treatment. The study emphasizes the importance of combining diverse approaches, customizing treatments for individual patients, and ongoing research efforts to improve GBM patients\' outlook.

The investigation of therapeutic cancer vaccines has been ongoing for the past century. Herein, we used VOSviewer and CiteSpace to perform the first global bibliometric analysis of the literature on therapeutic cancer vaccines from 2013 to 2022 aiming to explore the current status and potential research trends. The findings revealed a consistent upward trend in both publication counts and citations. The United States emerged as the leading contributor with the highest number of published papers. Additionally, the analysis of references and keywords indicated that therapeutic cancer vaccines have long been popular topics, whereas neoantigen vaccines, mRNA vaccines, combination strategies, and vaccine delivery systems are emerging research hotspots. This bibliometric study provides a comprehensive and important overview of the current knowledge and potential developments in therapeutic cancer vaccines from 2013 to 2022, which may serve as a valuable reference for scholars interested in further exploring this promising field.

Breast and gynecologic cancers are significant global threats to women\'s health and those living with the disease require lifelong physical, financial, and social support from their families, healthcare providers, and society as a whole. Cancer vaccines offer a promising means of inducing long-lasting immune response against the disease. Among various types of cancer vaccines available, peptide vaccines offer an effective strategy to elicit specific anti-tumor immune responses. Peptide vaccines have been developed based on tumor associated antigens (TAAs) and tumor specific neoantigens which can also be of viral origin. Molecular alterations in HER2 and non-HER2 genes are established to be involved in the pathogenesis of female-specific cancers and hence were exploited for the development of peptide vaccines against these diseases, most of which are in the latter stages of clinical trials. However, prophylactic vaccines for viral induced cancers, especially those against Human Papillomavirus (HPV) infection are well established. This review discusses therapeutic and prophylactic approaches for various types of female-specific cancers such as breast cancer and gynecologic cancers with special emphasis on peptide vaccines. We also present a pipeline for the design and evaluation of a multiepitope peptide vaccine that can be active against female-specific cancers.

BACKGROUND: Wilms\' tumor 1 (WT1) is highly expressed in various solid tumors and hematologic malignancies. DSP-7888 (adegramotide/nelatimotide) Emulsion is an investigational therapeutic cancer vaccine comprising three synthetic epitopes derived from WT1. We evaluated the mechanism of action of DSP-7888 Emulsion, which is hypothesized to induce WT1-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) and helper T lymphocytes (HTLs).
METHODS: The ability of nelatimotide and adegramotide to induce WT1-specific CD8+ T cells and CD4+ T cells was assessed in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). The ability of DSP-7888 Emulsion to induce WT1-specific CTLs in vivo was assessed using human leukocyte antigen-I (HLA-I) transgenic mice. To assess how adegramotide, the helper peptide in DSP-7888 Emulsion, enhances WT1-specific CTLs, HLA-I transgenic mice were administered DSP-7888 or nelatimotide-only Emulsion. Interferon-gamma secretion under antigen stimulation by splenocytes co-cultured with or without tumor cells was then quantified. The effects of combination treatment with DSP-7888 Emulsion and an anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) antibody on tumor volume and the frequency of tumor-infiltrating WT1-specific T cells were assessed in HLA-I transgenic mice implanted with WT1 antigen-positive tumors.
RESULTS: The peptides in DSP-7888 Emulsion were shown to induce WT1-specific CTLs and HTLs in both human PBMCs and HLA-I transgenic mice. Unlike splenocytes from nelatimotide-only Emulsion-treated mice, splenocytes from DSP-7888 Emulsion-treated mice exhibited high levels of interferon-gamma secretion, including when co-cultured with tumor cells; interferon-gamma secretion was further enhanced by concomitant treatment with anti-PD-1. HLA-I transgenic mice administered DSP-7888 Emulsion plus anti-PD-1 experienced significantly greater reductions in tumor size than mice treated with either agent alone. This reduction in tumor volume was accompanied by increased numbers of tumor-infiltrating WT1-specific CTLs.
CONCLUSIONS: DSP-7888 Emulsion can promote both cytotoxic and helper T-cell-mediated immune responses against WT1-positive tumors. Adegramotide enhances CTL numbers, and the CTLs induced by treatment with both nelatimotide and adegramotide are capable of functioning within the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. The ability of anti-PD-1 to enhance the antitumor activity of DSP-7888 Emulsion in mice implanted with WT1-positive tumors suggests the potential for synergy.

Cell Squeeze is a novel technology that relies on temporarily disrupting the cell membrane to deliver cargo directly into the cytosol. This approach is applicable to a broad range of cell types (peripheral blood mononuclear cells, red blood cells, hematopoietic stem cells, etc.) and cargos (peptides, proteins, small molecules, nucleic acids, and gene-editing complexes) while minimally disrupting normal cell function. By enabling direct cytosolic delivery, one can use this technology to dramatically enhance major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I presentation of antigens (Ags) for CD8+ T-cell activation-a longstanding challenge for the therapeutic cancer vaccine field that has generally relied on cross-presentation of endocytosed Ags. In addition, by coupling improved MHC class I presentation with coexpression of additional stimulatory factors or systemic immune modulators, one can further enhance the potential impact of an antitumor CD8 response. Pursuing a more direct cellular engineering strategy, which is independent of viral transduction, genetic manipulation, and expansion steps, enables <24 h manufacturing of autologous cell therapies. Through generation of more sophisticated, multifunctional, cell-based vaccines, clinical testing of this technology will elucidate its potential for impact across multiple tumor types.

UNASSIGNED: Therapeutic cancer vaccines, which induce or amplify tumor-specific T cell responses, are a critical component of multiple combination cancer immunotherapy regimens. Innovative neoantigen identification continually prompts the development of vaccine platforms. However, vaccine monotherapy is not sufficient to eradicate tumors. Thus, therapeutic strategies combining cancer vaccines and treatment with other immune modulators have been expl, ored. Previously, we showed that flagellin has an excellent adjuvant activity to induce effective immune responses to co-administered peptide epitopes through TLR5 stimulation in mouse TC-1 tumor models and flagellin-expressing bacteria modulate the tumor microenvironment (TME) toward enhanced immunogenicity.
UNASSIGNED: Given that short- and long-peptides undergo different fates of internalization, processing, and MHC-restricted presentation by professional antigen-presenting cells (APCs), we compared the antitumor activity of flagellin-adjuvanted peptide vaccines by employing the E7 CD8 epitope short peptide (E7-SP49-57) and E7 long peptides (E7-LP2043-62 and E7-LP3543-77). Because combinations take center stage in immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy, we evaluated the best E7 peptide vaccine component for combination with anti-PD-1 in the mouse TC-1 model.
UNASSIGNED: Flagellin adjuvanted E7-LP35 vaccine (FlaB-LP35Vax) showed significantly higher antitumor activity than flagellin adjuvanted E7-SP vaccine (FlaB-SPVax) and flagellin adjuvanted E7-LP20 vaccine (FlaB-LP20Vax) in a mouse TC-1 tumor model. Coadministration of flagellin was essential for E7-mediated tumor suppression. PD-1 blockade enhanced the therapeutic efficacy of FlaB-LP35Vax but not FlaB-SPVax. Taken together, E7-LP35 is an optimal tumor antigen for flagellin-adjuvanted E7 cancer vaccines, and the combination of FlaB-LP35Vax with anti-PD-1 antibody treatment induced long-term antitumor immune responses.
UNASSIGNED: This result suggests that cooperation between CD4+ and CD8+ cell-mediated immune responses is essential for the success of combination therapy with cancer vaccines and ICIs.

BACKGROUND: SV-BR-1-GM, derived from a patient with grade 2 (moderately differentiated) breast cancer, is a GM-CSF-secreting breast cancer cell line with properties of antigen-presenting cells. SV-BR-1-GM and next-generation versions are covered by several pending and granted patents.
METHODS: We report findings from an open-label phase I, single-arm pilot study with irradiated SV-BR-1-GM cells in 3 breast and 1 ovarian cancer subjects. Inoculations were preceded by lowdose intravenous cyclophosphamide and followed by interferon-alpha2b injections into the SVBR- 1-GM inoculation sites. We assessed both cellular and humoral immune responses, and measured expression levels of SV-BR-1-GM HLA alleles.
RESULTS: Treatment was generally safe and well tolerated. Immune responses were elicited universally. Overall survival was more than 33 months for three of the four patients. As previously reported, one patient had prompt regression of metastases in lung, breast, and soft tissue. Following cessation of treatment, the patient relapsed widely, including in the brain. Upon retreatment, rapid tumor response was again seen, including complete regression of brain metastases. Consistent with a role of Class II HLA in contributing to SV-BR-1-GM\'s mechanism of action, this patient allele-matched SV-BR-1-GM at the HLA-DRB1 and HLA-DRB3 loci. We are in the process of developing next-generation SV-BR-1-GM, expressing patient-specific HLAs. Patent applications were filed in various jurisdictions. Thus far, one is granted, in Japan.
CONCLUSIONS: A whole-cell immunotherapy regimen with SV-BR-1-GM cells induced regression of metastatic breast cancer. We develop intellectual property based on SV-BR-1-GM\'s predicted mechanism of action to develop additional whole-cell immunotherapies for cancer patients.