Cancer is one of the most complex and challenging human diseases, with rising incidences and cancer-related deaths despite improved diagnosis and personalized treatment options. Targeted alpha therapy (TαT) offers an exciting strategy emerging for cancer treatment which has proven effective even in patients with advanced metastatic disease that has become resistant to other treatments. Yet, in many cases, more sophisticated strategies are needed to stall disease progression and overcome resistance to TαT. The combination of two or more therapies which have historically been used as stand-alone treatments is an approach that has been pursued in recent years. This review aims to provide an overview on TαT and the four main pillars of therapeutic strategies in cancer management, namely external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), cytostatic chemotherapy (CCT), and brachytherapy (BT), and to discuss their potential use in combination with TαT. A brief description of each therapy is followed by a review of known biological aspects and state-of-the-art treatment practices. The emphasis, however, is given to the motivation for combination with TαT as well as the pre-clinical and clinical studies conducted to date.

The utilization of actinium-225 (225Ac) radionuclides in targeted alpha therapy for cancer was initially outlined in 1993. Over the past two decades, substantial research has been conducted, encompassing the establishment of 225Ac production methods, various preclinical investigations, and several clinical studies. Currently, there is a growing number of compounds labeled with 225Ac that are being developed and tested in clinical trials. In response to the increasing demand for this nuclide, production facilities are either being built or have already been established. This article offers a concise summary of the present state of clinical advancements in compounds labeled with 225Ac. It outlines various processes involved in the production and purification of 225Ac to cater to the growing demand for this radionuclide. The article examines the merits and drawbacks of different procedures, delves into preclinical trials, and discusses ongoing clinical trials.

Astatine-211 (211At) has emerged as a promising radionuclide for targeted alpha therapy of cancer by virtue of its favorable nuclear properties. However, the limited in vivo stability of 211At-labeled radiopharmaceuticals remains a major challenge. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current strategies for 211At radiolabeling, including nucleophilic and electrophilic substitution reactions, as well as the recent advances in the development of novel bifunctional coupling agents and labeling approaches to enhance the stability of 211At-labeled compounds. The preclinical and clinical applications of 211At-labeled radiopharmaceuticals, including small molecules, peptides, and antibodies, are also discussed. Looking forward, the identification of new molecular targets, the optimization of 211At production and quality control methods, and the continued evaluation of 211At-labeled radiopharmaceuticals in preclinical and clinical settings will be the key to realizing the full potential of 211At-based targeted alpha therapy. With the growing interest and investment in this field, 211At-labeled radiopharmaceuticals are poised to play an increasingly important role in future cancer treatment.

BACKGROUND: A significant challenge in cancer therapy lies in eradicating hidden disseminated tumor cells. Within Nuclear Medicine, Targeted Alpha Therapy is a promising approach for cancer treatment tackling disseminated cancer. As tumor size decreases, alpha-particles gain prominence due to their high Linear Energy Transfer (LET) and short path length. Among alpha-particle emitters, 211At stands out with its 7.2 hour half-life and 100% alpha emission decay. However, optimizing the pharmacokinetics of radiopharmaceuticals with short lived radionuclides such as 211At is pivotal, and in this regard, pretargeting is a valuable tool. This method involves priming the tumor with a modified monoclonal antibody capable of binding both the tumor antigen and the radiolabeled carrier, termed the \"effector molecule. This smaller, faster-clearing molecule improves efficacy. Utilizing the Diels Alder click reaction between Tetrazine (Tz) and Trans-cyclooctene (TCO), the Tz-substituted effector molecule combines seamlessly with the TCO-modified antibody. This study aims to evaluate the in vivo biodistribution of two Poly-L-Lysine-based effector molecule sizes (10 and 21 kDa), labelled with 211At, and the in vitro binding of the most favorable polymer size, in order to optimize the pretargeted radioimmunotherapy with 211At.
RESULTS: In vivo results favor the smaller polymer\'s biodistribution pattern over the larger one, which accumulates in organs like the liver and spleen. This is especially evident when comparing the biodistribution of the smaller polymer to a directly labelled monoclonal antibody. The smaller variant also shows rapid and efficient binding to SKOV-3 cells preloaded with TCO-modified Trastuzumab in vitro, emphasizing its potential. Both polymer sizes showed equal or better in vivo stability of the astatine-carbon bond compared to a monoclonal antibody labelled with the same prosthetic group.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the small Poly-L-Lysine-based effector molecule (10 kDa) holds the most promise for future research, exhibiting significantly lower uptake in the kidneys and spleen compared to the larger effector (21 kDa) while maintaining an in vivo stability of the astatine-carbon bond comparable to or better than intact antibodies. A proof of concept in vitro cell study demonstrates rapid reaction between the small astatinated effector and a TCO-labelled antibody, indicating the potential of this novel Poly-L-Lysine-based pretargeting system for further investigation in an in vivo tumor model.

Targeted alpha particle therapy (TAT) has emerged as a promising strategy for the treatment of prostate cancer (PCa). Actinium-225 (225Ac), a potent alpha-emitting radionuclide, may be incorporated into targeting vectors, causing robust and in some cases sustained antitumor responses. The development of radiolabeling techniques involving EDTA, DOTA, DOTPA, and Macropa chelators has laid the groundwork for advancements in this field. At the forefront of clinical trials with 225Ac in PCa are PSMA-targeted TAT agents, notably [225Ac]Ac-PSMA-617, [225Ac]Ac-PSMA-I&T and [225Ac]Ac-J591. Ongoing investigations spotlight [225Ac]Ac-hu11B6, [225Ac]Ac-YS5, and [225Ac]Ac-SibuDAB, targeting hK2, CD46, and PSMA, respectively. Despite these efforts, hurdles in 225Ac production, daughter redistribution, and a lack of suitable imaging techniques hinder the development of TAT. To address these challenges and additional advantages, researchers are exploring alpha-emitting isotopes including 227Th, 223Ra, 211At, 213Bi, 212Pb or 149Tb, providing viable alternatives for TAT.

UNASSIGNED: The radionuclide pair cerium-134/lanthanum-134 (134Ce/134La) was recently proposed as a suitable diagnostic counterpart for the therapeutic alpha-emitter actinium-225 (225Ac). The unique properties of 134Ce offer perspectives for developing innovative in vivo investigations not possible with 225Ac. In this work, 225Ac- and 134Ce-labeled tracers were directly compared using internalizing and slow-internalizing cancer models to evaluate their in vivo comparability, progeny meandering, and potential as a matched theranostic pair for clinical translation. Despite being an excellent chemical match, 134Ce/134La has limitations to the setting of quantitative positron emission tomography imaging.
UNASSIGNED: The precursor PSMA-617 and a macropa-based tetrazine-conjugate (mcp-PEG8-Tz) were radiolabelled with 225Ac or 134Ce and compared in vitro and in vivo using standard (radio)chemical methods. Employing biodistribution studies and positron emission tomography (PET) imaging in athymic nude mice, the radiolabelled PSMA-617 tracers were evaluated in a PC3/PIP (PC3 engineered to express a high level of prostate-specific membrane antigen) prostate cancer mouse model. The 225Ac and 134Ce-labeled mcp-PEG8-Tz were investigated in a BxPC-3 pancreatic tumour model harnessing the pretargeting strategy based on a trans-cyclooctene-modified 5B1 monoclonal antibody.
UNASSIGNED: In vitro and in vivo studies with both 225Ac and 134Ce-labelled tracers led to comparable results, confirming the matching pharmacokinetics of this theranostic pair. However, PET imaging of the 134Ce-labelled precursors indicated that quantification is highly dependent on tracer internalization due to the redistribution of 134Ce\'s PET-compatible daughter 134La. Consequently, radiotracers based on internalizing vectors like PSMA-617 are suited for this theranostic pair, while slow-internalizing 225Ac-labelled tracers are not quantitatively represented by 134Ce PET imaging.
UNASSIGNED: When employing slow-internalizing vectors, 134Ce might not be an ideal match for 225Ac due to the underestimation of tumour uptake caused by the in vivo redistribution of 134La. However, this same characteristic makes it possible to estimate the redistribution of 225Ac\'s progeny noninvasively. In future studies, this unique PET in vivo generator will further be harnessed to study tracer internalization, trafficking of receptors, and the progression of the tumour microenvironment.

UNASSIGNED: Cancer combination treatments involving immunotherapies with targeted radiation therapy are at the forefront of treating cancers. However, dosing and scheduling of these therapies pose a challenge. Mathematical models provide a unique way of optimizing these therapies.
UNASSIGNED: Using a preclinical model of multiple myeloma as an example, we demonstrate the capability of a mathematical model to combine these therapies to achieve maximum response, defined as delay in tumor growth. Data from mice studies with targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell monotherapies and combinations with different intervals between them was used to calibrate mathematical model parameters. The dependence of progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and the time to minimum tumor burden on dosing and scheduling was evaluated. Different dosing and scheduling schemes were evaluated to maximize the PFS and optimize timings of TRT and CAR-T cell therapies.
UNASSIGNED: Therapy intervals that were too close or too far apart are shown to be detrimental to the therapeutic efficacy, as TRT too close to CAR-T cell therapy results in radiation related CAR-T cell killing while the therapies being too far apart result in tumor regrowth, negatively impacting tumor control and survival. We show that splitting a dose of TRT or CAR-T cells when administered in combination is advantageous only if the first therapy delivered can produce a significant benefit as a monotherapy.
UNASSIGNED: Mathematical models are crucial tools for optimizing the delivery of cancer combination therapy regimens with application along the lines of achieving cure, maximizing survival or minimizing toxicity.

Preclinical studies are essential for effectively evaluating TAT radiopharmaceuticals. Given the current suboptimal supply chain of these radionuclides, animal studies must be refined to produce the most translatable TAT agents with the greatest clinical potential. Vector design is pivotal, emphasizing harmonious physical and biological characteristics among the vector, target, and radionuclide. The scarcity of alpha-emitting radionuclides remains a significant consideration. Actinium-225 and lead-212 appear as the most readily available radionuclides at this stage. Available animal models for researchers encompass xenografts, allografts, and PDX (patient-derived xenograft) models. Emerging strategies for imaging alpha-emitters are also briefly explored. Ultimately, preclinical research must address two critical aspects: (1) offering valuable insights into balancing safety and efficacy, and (2) providing guidance on the optimal dosing of the TAT agent.

[177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 has recently been successfully approved by the FDA, the MHRA, Health Canada and the EMA as Pluvicto®. However, salivary gland (SG) and kidney toxicities account for its main dose-limiting side-effects, while its corresponding uptake and retention mechanisms still remain elusive. Recently, the presence of different ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters, such as human breast cancer resistance proteins (BCRP), multidrug resistance proteins (MDR1), multidrug-resistance-related proteins (MRP1, MRP4) and solute cassette (SLC) transporters, such as multidrug and toxin extrusion proteins (MATE1, MATE2-K), organic anion transporters (OAT1, OAT2v1, OAT3, OAT4) and peptide transporters (PEPT2), has been verified at different abundances in human SGs and kidneys. Therefore, our aim was to assess whether [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 and [225Ac]Ac-PSMA-617 are substrates of these ABC and SLC transporters. For in vitro studies, the novel isotopologue ([α,β-3H]Nal)Lu-PSMA-617 was used in cell lines or vesicles expressing the aforementioned human ABC and SLC transporters for inhibition and uptake studies, respectively. The corresponding probe substrates and reference inhibitors were used as controls. Our results indicate that [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 and [225Ac]Ac-PSMA-617 are neither inhibitors nor substrates of the examined transporters. Therefore, our results show that human ABC and SLC transporters play no central role in the uptake and retention of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 and [225Ac]Ac-PSMA-617 in the SGs and kidneys nor in the observed toxicities.

BACKGROUND: The alpha emitter astatine-211 (211At) is garnering attention as a novel targeted alpha therapy for patients with refractory thyroid cancer resistant to conventional therapy using beta emitter radioiodine (131I). Herein, we aimed to establish a robust method for the manufacturing and quality control of [211At]NaAt solution for intravenous administration under the good manufacturing practice guidelines for investigational products to conduct an investigator-initiated clinical trial.
RESULTS: 211At was separated and purified via dry distillation using irradiated Bi plates containing 211At obtained by the nuclear reaction of 209Bi(4He, 2n)211At. After purification, the 211At trapped in the cold trap was collected in a reaction vessel using 15 mL recovery solution (1% ascorbic acid and 2.3% sodium hydrogen carbonate). After stirring the 211At solution for 1 h inside a closed system, the reaction solution was passed through a sterile 0.22 μm filter placed in a Grade A controlled area and collected in a product vial to prepare the [211At]NaAt solution. According to the 3-lot tests, decay collected radioactivity and radiochemical yield of [211At]NaAt were 78.8 ± 6.0 MBq and 40 ± 3%, respectively. The radiochemical purity of [211At]At- obtained via ion-pair chromatography at the end of synthesis (EOS) was 97 ± 1%, and remained > 96% 6 h after EOS; it was detected at a retention time (RT) 3.2-3.3 min + RT of I-. LC-MS analysis indicated that this principal peak corresponded with an astatide ion (m/z = 210.988046). In gamma-ray spectrometry, the 211At-related peaks were identified (X-ray: 76.9, 79.3, 89.3, 89.8, and 92.3 keV; γ-ray: 569.7 and 687.0 keV), whereas the peak at 245.31 keV derived from 210At was not detected during the 22 h continuous measurement. The target material, Bi, was below the 9 ng/mL detection limit in all lots of the finished product. The pH of the [211At]NaAt solution was 7.9-8.6; the concentration of ascorbic acid was 9-10 mg/mL. Other quality control tests, including endotoxin and sterility tests, confirmed that the [211At]NaAt solution met all quality standards.
CONCLUSIONS: We successfully established a stable method of [211At]NaAt solution that can be administered to humans intravenously as an investigational product.