BACKGROUND: Idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias (IVAs) arising from different portions of the communicating vein of the left ventricular summit (summit-CV) are not a rare phenomenon. Whereas its electrocardiographic (ECG) and electrophysiological characteristics are not fully investigated.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify distinct ECG and electrophysiological features of IVAs originating from different portions of summit-CV.
METHODS: Nineteen patients confirmed arising from summit-CV were included in this study.
RESULTS: The 19 patients were divided into proximal and distal portion groups based on their target sites in summit-CV. In the proximal portion group, 100% (11/11) VAs showed dominant negative (rs or QS) waves in lead I, while in the distal portion group, 87.5% (7/8) showed dominant positive waves (R, Rs or r) (p < 0.000). In lead V1, 100% (11/11) of the proximal portion group showed dominant positive waves (R or Rs), while 62.50% (5/8) of the distal portion group showed positive and negative bidirectional or negative waves (RS or rS) (p < 0.005). RI>4mV, SI<3.5mV, RV1<13mV, SV1>3.5mV, RI/SI>0.83, and RV1/SV1< 2.6 indicated a distal portion of summit-CV with the predictive value of 0.909, 1.000, 0.653, 0.972, 0.903, 0.966, respectively. A more positive wave in lead I and a more negative wave in lead V1 indicated more distal origin in summit-CV. Target sites in proximal and distal summit-CV groups showed similar electrophysiological characteristics during mapping.
CONCLUSIONS: There were significant differences in ECG characteristics of VAs at different portions of summit-CV, which could aid pre-procedure planning and facilitate radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) procedures.

This article describes the case of a 40-year-old individual who presented with fulminant myocarditis. Initial ECG displayed sinus tachycardia with a heart rate of 117 bpm, QS complexes in leads V1-V3, ST-segment depression in leads II, III, aVF, V5-V6, and ST-segment elevation >0.2 mV in leads V1 through V3. The initial clinical assessment suggested an acute anteroseptal myocardial infarction. However, subsequent diagnostic evaluation through coronary angiography disclosed that the coronary arteries were normal. Therefore, clinicians should carefully consider the differential diagnosis between these conditions, as their management strategies differ markedly. Two hours after admission, the patient unexpectedly developed syncope. The ECG findings were consistent with the typical characteristics of bidirectional ventricular tachycardia. Our report described the appearance and morphology as well as mechanism of bidirectional ventricular tachycardia in detail. Additionally, we delineate differential diagnoses for disease that can cause bidirectional ventricular tachycardia, such as aconite poisoning, digoxin overdose, immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), myocardial ischemia, and hereditary channelopathies, such as catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) and Andersen-Tawil syndrome. Therefore, clinicians should recognize this ECG finding immediately and initiate appropriate treatment promptly as these measures may be vital in saving the patient\'s life.

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of catheter ablation as the first-line treatment of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with structural heart disease (SHD) and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Patients with SHD are particularly susceptible to VT, a condition that increases the risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) can terminate VT and prevent SCD but do not prevent VT recurrence. The efficacy and safety of CA as a first-line treatment in SHD patients with preserved LVEF remain unclear. We searched PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL for studies reporting the outcomes of CA therapy in patients with VT and preserved LVEF, published up to January 19, 2023. The primary outcome was the incidence of SCD following catheter ablation as the first-line treatment of VT in patients with SHD and preserved LVEF. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, VT recurrence, procedural complications, CA success rate, and ICD implantation after catheter ablation. We included seven studies in the meta-analysis, encompassing a total of 920 patients. The pooled success rate of catheter ablation was 84.6% (95% CI 67.2-93.6). Complications occurred in 6.4% (95% CI 4.0-9.9) of patients, and 13.9% (95% CI 10.1-18.8) required ICD implantation after ablation. VT recurrence was observed in 23.2% (95% CI 14.8-34.6) of patients, while the rate of sudden cardiac death (SCD) was 3.1% (95% CI 1.7-5.6). The overall prevalence of all-cause mortality in this population was 5% (95% CI 1.8-13). CA appears promising as a first-line VT treatment in patients with SHD and preserved LVEF, especially for monomorphic hemodynamically tolerated VT. However, due to the lack of direct comparisons with ICDs and anti-arrhythmic drugs, further research is needed to confirm these findings.

OBJECTIVE: Ventricular tachycardia (VT) non-inducibility in response to programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) is a widely used procedural endpoint for VT ablation despite inconclusive evidence with respect to clinical outcomes in high-risk patients. The aim is to determine the utility of acute post-ablation VT inducibility as a predictor of VT recurrence, mortality, or mortality equivalent in high-risk patients.
RESULTS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of high-risk patients (defined as PAINESD > 17) who underwent scar-related VT ablation at our institution between July 2010 and July 2022. Patients\' response to PVS (post-procedure) was categorized into three groups: Group A, no clinical VT or VT with cycle length > 240 ms inducible; Group B, only non-clinical VT with cycle length > 240 ms induced; and Group C, all other outcomes (including cases where no PVS was performed). The combined primary endpoint included death, durable left ventricular assist device placement, and cardiac transplant (Cox analysis). Ventricular tachycardia recurrence was considered a secondary endpoint (competing risk analysis). Of the 1677 VT ablation cases, 123 cases met the inclusion criteria for analysis. During a 19-month median follow-up time (interquartile range 4-43 months), 82 (66.7%) patients experienced the composite primary endpoint. There was no difference between Groups A and C with respect to the primary [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.21 (0.94-1.57), P = 0.145] or secondary [HR = 1.18 (0.91-1.54), P = 0.210] outcomes. These findings persisted after multivariate adjustments. The size of Group B (n = 13) did not permit meaningful statistical analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of post-ablation PVS do not significantly correlate with long-term outcomes in high-risk (PAINESD > 17) VT ablation patients.

OBJECTIVE: Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) is a complex cardiac disorder associated with ventricular arrhythmias. Understanding the relationship between mechanical uncoupling and cardiac structural changes in ACM patients is crucial for improved risk stratification and management.
METHODS: In this study, we enrolled 25 ACM patients (median age 34 years, 72% men) based on the 2019 Modified Task Force and Padua criteria. Patients were categorized by the presence or absence of clinically relevant ventricular tachycardia (crVT), necessitating emergency interventions. Right ventricular-arterial coupling (VAC) was assessed using echocardiography. Low-rank regression splines were employed to model left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) in relation to VAC.
RESULTS: Positive associations were observed between VAC and LVEF (ρ = 0.472, p = 0.023), RVEF (ρ = 0.522, p = 0.038), and right ventricular (RV) indexed stroke volume (ρ = 0.79, p < 0.001). Patients with crVT exhibited correlations with RV shortening, reduced RVEF (39.6 vs. 32.2%, p = 0.025), increased left ventricular (LV) mass (38.99 vs. 45.55, p = 0.045), and LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) (56.99 vs. 68.15 mL/m2, p = 0.045). Positive associations for VAC were noted with LVEDV (p = 0.039) and LV mass (p = 0.039), while negative correlations were observed with RVEF by CMR (p = 0.023) and RV shortening by echocardiography (p = 0.026).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings underscore the significance of right VAC in ACM, demonstrating correlations with RV and LVEF, RV stroke volume, and clinically relevant arrhythmias. Insights into RVEF, LV mass, and end-diastolic volume provide valuable contributions to the understanding of ACM pathophysiology and may inform risk assessment strategies.
OBJECTIVE: La miocardiopatía arritmogénica (MCA) es un trastorno cardíaco complejo asociado con arritmias ventriculares (AV). Comprender la relación entre el desacoplamiento mecánico y los cambios estructurales cardíacos en pacientes con MCA es crucial para una estratificación de riesgos y una gestión mejorada.
UNASSIGNED: En este estudio, reclutamos a 25 pacientes con MCA (edad media 34 años, 72% hombres) basándonos en los criterios del Task Force 2019 y los criterios de Padua. Los pacientes se clasificaron según la presencia o ausencia de taquicardia ventricular clínicamente relevante (crVT), que requería intervenciones de emergencia. Se evaluó el acoplamiento ventricular derecho-arterial (VAC) mediante ecocardiografía. Se utilizaron low-rank regression splines para modelar la fracción de eyección del ventrículo izquierdo (FEVI) y la fracción de eyección del ventrículo derecho (FEVD) en relación con el VAC.
RESULTS: Se observaron asociaciones positivas entre el VAC y la FEVI (ρ = 0.472, p = 0.023), la FEVD (ρ = 0.522, p = 0.038) y el volumen de eyección indexado del ventrículo derecho (ρ = 0.79, p < 0.001). Los pacientes con crVT mostraron correlaciones con acortamiento del ventrículo derecho, disminución de la FEVD (39.6 vs. 32.2%, p = 0.025), aumento de la masa ventricular izquierda (38.99 vs. 45.55, p = 0.045) y volumen diastólico final del ventrículo izquierdo (VDVI) (56.99 vs. 68.15 mL/m2, p = 0.045). Se observaron asociaciones positivas para el VAC con el VDVI (p = 0.039) y la masa ventricular izquierda (p = 0.039), mientras que se observaron correlaciones negativas con la FEVD por RMC (p = 0.023) y el acortamiento del ventrículo derecho por ecocardiografía (p = 0.026).
CONCLUSIONS: Nuestros hallazgos subrayan la importancia del VAC derecho en la MCA, demostrando correlaciones con la FEVD y FEVI, el volumen de eyección del ventrículo derecho y arritmias clínicamente relevantes. Las percepciones sobre la FEVD, la masa ventricular izquierda y el volumen diastólico final proporcionan contribuciones valiosas para comprender la fisiopatología de la MCA y pueden informar estrategias de evaluación de riesgos.

Catheter ablation (CA) has become an established treatment strategy for managing recurrent ventricular tachycardias (VTs) in patients with structural heart disease. In recent years, percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (PMCS) devices have been increasingly used intra-operatively to improve the ablation outcome. One indication would be rescue therapy for patients who develop haemodynamic deterioration during the ablation. However, more efforts are focused on identifying subjects who are at high risk of such deterioration and could benefit from the pre-emptive use of the PMCS. The third reason to use PMCS could be the inability to identify diffuse substrate, especially in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy. This paper reviews available experiences using various types of PMCS in different clinical scenarios. Although PMCS allows mapping during VT, it does not significantly influence acute outcomes and not convincingly long-term outcomes. On the contrary, the complication rate appears to be higher in PMCS cohorts. Our data suggest that even in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction, the substrate modification can be performed without the need for general anaesthesia and risk of haemodynamic decompensation. In end-stage heart failure associated with the electrical storm, implantation of a left ventricular assist device (or PMCS with a transition to the left ventricular assist device) might be the preferred strategy before CA. In high-risk patients who are not potential candidates for these treatment options, radiotherapy could be considered as a bail-out treatment of recurrent VTs. These approaches should be studied in prospective trials.

Bidirectional ventricular tachycardia (BVT) is a rare form of malignant ventricular arrhythmia characterized by beat-to-beat alternation in the QRS axis. BVT is a hallmark of digitalis toxicity, but digoxin-induced BVT secondary to digoxin-diuretic interaction in cardiac surgery patients is not widely reported. We present the case of a 62-year-old woman undergoing mitral valve replacement with tricuspid annuloplasty who developed postoperative congestive heart failure and vasoplegic syndrome requiring norepinephrine, vasopressin, and loop diuretics. During postoperative care, she presented atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response, achieving rate control with digoxin, but later displayed hemodynamically stable BVT associated with digitalis toxicity. The case highlights the importance of physicians monitoring digoxin toxicity when prescribing digoxin to patients with a diuretic regimen, particularly loop diuretics. During digoxin-induced-BVT, supportive treatment, including discontinuing digitalis coupled with potassium and magnesium supplements, can be considered as long as digoxin-specific antibodies are unavailable, and the patient is hemodynamically stable.
La taquicardia ventricular bidireccional (TVB) es una arritmia rara caracterizada por alternancia latido a latido en el eje QRS. La TVB es característica de intoxicación digitálica; sin embargo, la TVB secundaria a interacción digoxina-diurético en pacientes posoperados de cirugía cardíaca no se ha reportado ampliamente. Presentamos el caso de una mujer de 62 años sometida a cirugía cardiaca que desarrolló falla cardiaca congestiva y síndrome vasopléjico en el posoperatorio por lo que requirió noradrenalina, vasopresina y diurético de asa. Durante la hospitalización presentó fibrilación auricular con respuesta ventricular rápida; se logró control con digoxina, pero posteriormente presentó TVB asociada a intoxicación digitálica. Este caso resalta la importancia de detectar intoxicación digitálica durante la prescripción de digoxina a pacientes con un régimen diurético, especialmente diuréticos de asa. Durante la TVB inducida por digoxina, el tratamiento de soporte se puede considerar cuando no haya disponible anticuerpos específicos para digoxina y el paciente este hemodinámicamente estable.

OBJECTIVE: Wearable cardioverter-defibrillators (WCDs) are indicated in patients at risk of sudden cardiac arrest who are not immediate candidates for implantable defibrillator therapy. Limitations of existing WCDs include poor compliance and high false alarm rates. The Jewel is a novel patch-WCD (P-WCD) that addresses these limitations with an adhesive-based design for near-continuous wear and a machine learning algorithm designed to minimize inappropriate detections. This was a first-in-human study of the Jewel P-WCD conducted in an electrophysiology (EP) lab to determine the safety and effectiveness of the device in terminating ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) with a single shock. The aim was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of terminating VT/VF with a single shock using the Jewel P-WCD.
RESULTS: This was a first-in-human, prospective, single-arm, single-centre study in patients scheduled for an EP procedure in which VT/VF was expected to either spontaneously occur or be induced. The Jewel P-WCD was placed on consented patients; upon confirmation of VT/VF, a single shock (150 J) was delivered via the device. A group sequential design and Pocock alpha spending function was used to measure the observed proportion of successful VT/VF single-shock terminations. The endpoint was achieved if the lower confidence limit exceeded the performance goal of 62%, using a one-sided lower 97.4% exact confidence bound. Of 18 eligible subjects, 16 (88.9%, 97.4% confidence bound: 65.4%) were successfully defibrillated with a single shock, exceeding the primary endpoint performance goal with no adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS: This first-in-human evaluation of the Jewel P-WCD demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of terminating VT/VF.
BACKGROUND: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/; Unique identifier: NCT05490459.

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are widely used as end-stage therapy in patients with advanced heart failure, whereas implantation increases the risks of development of sustained ventricular tachycardia at the later postimplantation stage. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of orally administered amiodarone and propranolol in 3 patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT) after LVAD implantation who were resistant to initial anti-antiarrhythmic drugs. This retrospective cohort study consisted of the initial evaluation of the clinical data of 14 adult patients who underwent implantation of LVAD between January 2019 and March 2021. A total of 3 patients with resistant VT were finally included. In all cases, the patients were initially administered amiodarone in the different doses intravenously to stabilize the critical condition, whereas its oral form along with that of propranolol was used as maintenance therapy in the first 2 cases. In the third case, amiodarone was withdrawn because of the risk of development of hyperthyroidism, while oral propranolol was used in the treatment. The assessment in the 16-month follow-up period after discharge did not show presence of non-sustained and sustained VT in all 3 cases. In the ventricular arrhythmia-free group, the total mortality rate within the follow-up period was 11.1 ± 7.78 months in the 3 patients. We suggest that maintenance oral therapy of propranolol and amiodarone can significantly decrease the risks of complications in patients with VT after implantation of ventricular assist device in the long term.

OBJECTIVE: A pulsed electric field (PF) energy source is a novel potential option for catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) as it can create deeper lesions, particularly in scarred tissue. However, very limited data exist on its efficacy and safety. This prospective observational study reports the initial experience with VA ablation using focal PF.
RESULTS: The study population consisted of 44 patients (16 women, aged 61 ± 14years) with either frequent ventricular premature complexes (VPCs, 48%) or scar-related ventricular tachycardia (VT, 52%). Ablation was performed using an irrigated 4 mm tip catheter and a commercially available PF generator. On average, 16 ± 15 PF applications (25 A) were delivered per patient. Acute success was achieved in 84% of patients as assessed by elimination of VPC or reaching non-inducibility of VT. In three cases (7%), a transient conduction system block was observed during PF applications remotely from the septum. Root analysis revealed that this event was caused by current leakage from the proximal shaft electrodes in contact with the basal interventricular septum. Acute elimination of VPC was achieved in 81% patients and non-inducibility of VT in 83% patients. At the 3-month follow-up, persistent suppression of the VPC was confirmed on Holter monitoring in 81% patients. In the VT group, the mean follow-up was 116 ± 75 days and a total of 52% patients remained free of any VA.
CONCLUSIONS: Pulsed electric field catheter ablation of a broad spectrum of VA is feasible with acute high efficacy; however, the short-term follow-up is less satisfactory for patients with scar-related VT.