背景:虽然通常是安全的,用合成的非透明质酸填充剂注射隆鼻可能导致各种畸形,这给患者带来了心理负担。由于注射的物质在技术上很难在鼻子中完全清除,手术主要是为了解决患者因注射引起的心理困扰。不幸的是,关于该手术的患者报告结局的数据很少.
方法:从2017年8月至2021年6月,作者回顾性分析了所有在注射隆鼻术后通过抽吸刮除异物的病例。相关的人口统计,收集治疗特点和并发症细节。在手术前和手术后6个月,前瞻性完成了改良的鼻成形术结果评估(ROE)问卷。
结果:在46例患者中,4例术后鼻背表面出现轻微的不规则性;2例手术前反复出现鼻背红肿,术后仍表现出较小程度的红肿;没有患者需要二次翻修。在6个月的随访中,任何患者报告的结局都有显着改善,相对于术前基线评分。
结论:吸刮术可有效清除鼻中注入的异物,并发症少。患者的满意度和生活质量,术前严重受损,手术后可明显改善。
方法:治疗性研究。该期刊要求作者为每篇文章分配一定程度的证据。对于这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或在线作者说明www。springer.com/00266.
Though generally safe, injection rhinoplasty with synthetic non-hyaluronic fillers may lead to various deformities, which impose a psychological burden on the patients. As the injected material is technically hard to be fully cleared in the nose, the surgery is primarily chosen to address the patients\' psychological distress caused by injection. Unfortunately, there is a paucity of data regarding patient-reported outcomes of this procedure.
From August of 2017 to June of 2021, the authors retrospectively reviewed all cases who underwent the foreign material removals by suction curettage after injection rhinoplasties. The relevant demographic, treatment characteristics and complication details were collected. The modified Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) questionnaires were prospectively completed before and 6 months after the surgery.
Of the 46 patients, four cases developed minor surface irregularities on the nasal dorsum postoperatively; two cases who had recurrent nasal dorsum redness and swelling before the surgery still exhibited the redness with a less degree after the surgery; no patients needed secondary revision. There was a significant improvement in any of patient-reported outcomes at 6-month follow-up, relative to the preoperative baseline scores.
The injected foreign material in the nose could be effectively removed by suction curettage with minimal complications. The patients\' satisfaction and quality of life, which was severely impaired preoperatively, could be significantly improved after the surgery.
Therapeutic study. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .