UNASSIGNED: Rapid progression of coronary non-target lesions is essential for the determination of future cardiovascular events. Clinical factors that predict rapid progression of non-target lesions are unclear. The purpose of this study was to identify the clinical predictors of rapid progression and revascularization of coronary non-target lesions.
UNASSIGNED: Consecutive patients with coronary heart disease who had undergone two serial coronary angiograms were enrolled. All coronary non-target lesions were identified and evaluated at both procedures. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to investigate the clinical risk factors associated with rapid progression or revascularization of coronary non-target lesions.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 1255 patients and 1670 lesions were enrolled. In this cohort of patients, 239 (19%) had rapid progression and 186 (14.8%) underwent revascularization. At the lesion level, 251 (15.0%) had rapid progression and 194 (11.6%) underwent revascularization. The incidence of lesion revascularization and myocardial infarction was significantly higher in patients with rapid progression. In multivariable analyses, hypertension (hazard ratio [HR], 0.76; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.58-1.00; p = 0.049), ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (HR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.03-2.07; p = 0.035), glycosylated hemoglobin (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01-1.33; p = 0.039) and lesion classification (B2/C versus A/B1) (HR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.27-2.35; p = 0.001) were significant factors associated with rapid progression. The level of triglycerides (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.00-1.20; p = 0.040) and lesion classification (B2/C versus A/B1) (HR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.09-2.14; p = 0.014) were predictors of lesion revascularization.
UNASSIGNED: Hypertension, STEMI, glycosylated hemoglobin and lesion classification may be used as predictors of rapid progression of coronary non-target lesions. The level of triglyceride and lesion classification may predict the revascularization of non-target lesions. In order to prevent future cardiovascular events, increased attention should be paid to patients with these factors.

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the most common cause of left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) and heart failure (HF). Revascularization with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) reduces all-cause mortality compared with medical therapy alone for these patients. Despite this, CABG is performed in a minority of patients with HF, partly due to patient unwillingness or inability to undergo major cardiac surgery and partly due to physician reluctance to refer for surgery due to high operative risk. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a less-invasive method of revascularization that has the potential to reduce periprocedural complications compared with CABG in patients with HF. Recent advances in PCI technology and technique have made it realistic to achieve more complete revascularization with PCI in high-risk patients with HF, although no randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) of PCI in HF compared with either medical therapy or CABG have been performed. In this review, we discuss the currently available evidence for PCI in HF and the association between the extent of revascularization and clinical outcomes in HF. We also review recent advances in PCI technology and techniques with the potential to improve clinical outcomes in HF. Finally, we discuss emerging clinical trial evidence of revascularization in HF and the large, persistent evidence gaps that should be addressed with future clinical trials of revascularization in HF.

暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。

Ischemic heart disease is the largest cause of death worldwide and the most common cause of heart failure (HF). The incidence and prevalence of HF are increasing owing to an aging population and improvements in the acute cardiac care of previously fatal conditions such as myocardial infarction. Strategies to improve outcomes in patients with ischemic systolic HF are urgently needed. There is systematic underutilization of testing for coronary artery disease in patients with HF, and revascularization is performed in an even smaller minority despite evidence for reduced mortality with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) over medical therapy in the Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure Extension Study. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a less-invasive approach to coronary revascularization; however, the recent Revascularization for Ischemic Ventricular Dysfunction (REVIVED)-British Cardiovascular Intervention Society (BCIS2) trial failed to demonstrate a benefit of PCI compared with that of medical therapy in patients with ischemic systolic HF. The comparative effectiveness of PCI and CABG for patients with ischemic systolic HF remains unknown, particularly in the era of contemporary medical therapy. In this review, we discuss the benefit of CABG in ischemic systolic HF, its underutilization, and the unmet clinical need. We also review the recent REVIVED-BCIS2 trial comparing PCI to medical therapy, as well as upcoming randomized controlled trials of PCI for ischemic systolic HF and persistent evidence gaps that will exist despite anticipated data from ongoing trials. There remains a need for an adequately powered randomized controlled trials to establish the comparative clinical effectiveness of PCI vs CABG in ischemic systolic HF in the era of contemporary revascularization approaches and medical therapy, as well as trials of coronary revascularization in patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction or less severe forms of left ventricular systolic dysfunction.

UNASSIGNED: Use of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) or optical coherence tomography (OCT) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is endorsed by society guidelines, but US data on real-world outcomes are lacking.
UNASSIGNED: Medicare claims data were identified for inpatient PCIs performed October 2015 to March 2020, with IVUS/OCT captured by ICD-10-PCS codes. Three-way propensity score matching (angio vs IVUS vs OCT) on baseline and procedural characteristics was performed. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), or repeat revascularization, was evaluated through 3 years, with a 30-day blanking window after index PCI to exclude staged procedures.
UNASSIGNED: Of the 502,821 PCI procedures, 463,201 (92%) were guided by angiography alone, with IVUS or OCT used in 37,908 (7.5%) and 1712 (0.3%), respectively. After propensity matching, compared with angiography, the risk of major adverse cardiovascular event was similar for IVUS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.97; 95% CI, 0.91-1.03; P = .285) but lower for OCT (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.77-0.94; P = .001). A similar trend was observed in clinically relevant subgroups. Compared with angiography alone, the risk of MI or repeat revascularization was lower with OCT (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.76-0.97; P = .015), and the risk of MI alone was lower with IVUS (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.82-0.99; P = .038).
UNASSIGNED: In a real-world US cohort, IVUS and OCT were used infrequently during PCI. Compared with angiography alone, use of intracoronary imaging during index PCI was associated with lower rates of clinical events through 3 years.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: The diabetic foot is a common cause of disability and death, and comorbid foot infections usually lead to prolonged hospitalization, high healthcare costs, and a significant increase in amputation rates. And most diabetic foot trauma is complicated by lower extremity arteriopathy, which becomes an independent risk factor for major amputation in diabetic foot patients.
OBJECTIVE: To establish the efficacy and safety of endovascular revascularization (ER) combined with vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) for the treatment of diabetic foot.
METHODS: Clinical data were collected from 40 patients with diabetic foot admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from April 2018 to April 2022. Diabetic foot lesions were graded according to Wagner\'s classification, and blood flow to the lower extremity was evaluated using the ankle-brachial index test and computerized tomography angiography of the lower extremity arteries. Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion pumps were used to achieve glycemic control. Lower limb revascularization was facilitated by percutaneous tran-sluminal balloon angioplasty (BA) or stenting. Wounds were cleaned by nibbling debridement. Wound granulation tissue growth was induced by VAC, and wound repair was performed by skin grafting or skin flap transplantation.
RESULTS: Of the 35 cases treated with lower limb revascularization, 34 were successful with a revascularization success rate of 97%. Of these, 6 cases underwent stenting after BA of the superficial femoral artery, and 1 received popliteal artery stent implantation. In the 25 cases treated with infrapopliteal artery revascularization, 39 arteries were reconstructed, 7 of which were treated by drug-coated BA and the remaining 32 with plain old BA. VAC was performed in 32 wounds. Twenty-four cases of skin grafting and 2 cases of skin flap transplantation were performed. Two patients underwent major amputations, whereas 17 had minor amputations, accounting for a success limb salvage rate of 95%.
CONCLUSIONS: ER in combination with VAC is a safe and effective treatment for diabetic foot that can significantly improve limb salvage rates. The use of VAC after ER simplifies and facilitates wound repair.

UNASSIGNED: The risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) after coronary revascularization in patients with left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction has not been characterized completely. This study aims to evaluate the incidence and time course of SCD after revascularization in such patients. The determinants of SCD within 3 months after revascularization were also assessed.
UNASSIGNED: A cohort study of patients with reduced ejection fraction (EF ≤ 40%), who underwent revascularization was performed. The incidence of SCD was estimated to account for the competing risk of deaths due to other causes.
UNASSIGNED: 2317 patients were enrolled. With a median follow-up of 3.5 years, 162 (32.1%) of the 504 deaths were due to SCD. The risk of SCD was highest in the first 3 months after revascularization, with an incidence rate of 0.37%/month. The event rate decreased to 0.12%/month, 0.08%/month, 0.09%/month, 0.14%/month, and 0.19%/month at 3-6 months, 6-12 months, 1-3 years, 3-5 years, and 5-10 years, respectively. A history of ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (hazard ratio [HR], 5.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33-23.19; p = 0.019) and triple vessel disease (HR, 3.90; 95% CI, 1.38-11.05; p = 0.010) were associated with the risk of SCD within 3 months. However, preoperative EF (in 5% increments) was not predictive (HR per 5% increase, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.62-1.55; p = 0.935).
UNASSIGNED: For patients with LV dysfunction, the risk of SCD was the highest during the first 3 months after revascularization. Further risk classification and treatment strategy are warranted.
UNASSIGNED: The name of the registry: Coronary Revascularization in Patients with Ischemic Heart Failure and Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death. Registration number: ChiCTR2100044378.

UNASSIGNED: About half of patients with ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) have multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD). Our aim was to provide a quantitative comparison of single-stage complete revascularization during the index revascularization versus deferred staged complete revascularization in STEMI patients with MVD.
UNASSIGNED: All studies evaluating patients with STEMI and MVD were included. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction and repeat revascularization. Secondary endpoints were cardiovascular death, acute kidney injury and trial defined major bleeding.
UNASSIGNED: Eight studies and 2256 patients with STEMI and MVD were included. No difference was evident in the rate of the primary composite endpoint among the study group (Risk Ratio 0.95; 95% CI 0.71-1.27, p = 0.74), while meta-regression showed a significant interaction with drug eluting stent (DES) use (Coefficient -0.005; 95% CI -0.01 to -0.001; p = 0.007). Higher rates of cardiovascular (CV) death were found in the immediate complete revascularization group (5.0% vs 2.6%; Risk Ratio 0.39; 95% CI 0.25-0.62; p < 0.01).
UNASSIGNED: Our analysis documented similar clinical outcomes with either single-stage immediate complete revascularization and delayed staged complete revascularization. Secondary analyses suggest that an increase in cardiovascular death might be expected with single-stage percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). While new randomized trials on the topic are ongoing, revascularization can be personalized and guided by the acute clinical setting, patients\'-related factors and workflow logistics.