racial disparity

种族差异
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:肝脾T细胞淋巴瘤(HSTCL)是一种罕见且侵袭性的外周T细胞淋巴瘤,代表不到1%的非霍奇金淋巴瘤。鉴于其稀有性,HSTCL的真实发生率未知,大部分数据是通过病例报告推断的.据我们所知,美国针对HSTCL患者流行病学和结局的最大和最新研究涵盖了1996年至2014年,样本量为122例.
    目的:描绘最新的HSTCL流行病学图景。
    方法:共186例确诊为HSTCL,在2000年至2017年之间,通过从监测中检索数据,最终被纳入我们的研究,流行病学,和结束结果数据库。我们分析了人口统计,临床特征,HSTCL的总死亡率(OM)和癌症特异性死亡率(CSM)。将单变量Cox回归中P值<0.01的变量纳入多变量Cox模型以确定独立的预后因素。风险比大于1代表不良预后因素。
    结果:男性是最有代表性的。HSTCL在中年患者(40-59)中最常见,在老年人(80+)中较少见。非西班牙裔白人(60.75%)和非西班牙裔黑人(20.97%)是最有代表性的种族群体。影响全因死亡率的因素的单变量Cox比例风险回归分析显示,非西班牙裔黑人患者的OM较高。非西班牙裔黑人和远处转移患者的CSM也较高。影响CSM因素的多变量Cox比例风险回归分析显示,80岁或80岁以上患者和非西班牙裔黑人患者的死亡率更高。
    结论:总体而言,这种罕见恶性肿瘤的前景非常严峻。在这项美国人口的回顾性队列研究中,非西班牙裔黑人和老年人的CSM较高.该数据强调需要进行更大规模的前瞻性研究,以调查与一个种族预后较差相关的因素。如治疗延误,这已被证明会增加该种族/族裔群体对其他癌症的死亡率。
    BACKGROUND: Hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma (HSTCL) is a rare and aggressive peripheral T-cell lymphoma with historically dismal outcomes, representing less than one percent of non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Given its rarity, the true incidence of HSTCL is unknown and most data have been extrapolated through case reports. To the best of our knowledge, the largest and most up to date study addressing the epidemiology and outcomes of patients with HSTCL in the United States covered a period from 1996 to 2014, with a sample size of 122 patients.
    OBJECTIVE: To paint the most updated epidemiological picture of HSTCL.
    METHODS: A total of 186 patients diagnosed with HSTCL, between 2000 and 2017, were ultimately enrolled in our study by retrieving data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. We analyzed demographics, clinical characteristics, and overall mortality (OM) as well as cancer-specific mortality (CSM) of HSTCL. Variables with a P value < 0.01 in the univariate Cox regression were incorporated into the multivariate Cox model to determine the independent prognostic factors, with a hazard ratio of greater than 1 representing adverse prognostic factors.
    RESULTS: Male gender was the most represented. HSTCL was most common in middle-aged patients (40-59) and less common in the elderly (80+). Non-Hispanic whites (60.75%) and non-Hispanic blacks (20.97%) were the most represented racial groups. Univariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis of factors influencing all-cause mortality showed a higher OM among non-Hispanic black patients. CSM was also higher among non-Hispanic blacks and patients with distant metastasis. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis of factors affecting CSM revealed higher mortality in patients aged 80 or older and non-Hispanic blacks.
    CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the outlook for this rare malignancy is very grim. In this retrospective cohort study of the United States population, non-Hispanic blacks and the elderly had a higher CSM. This data highlights the need for larger prospective studies to investigate factors associated with worse prognosis in one ethnic group, such as treatment delays, which have been shown to increase mortality in this racial/ethnic group for other cancers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    活性氧(ROS)参与几乎所有疾病,包括癌症.许多因素,包括衰老,高脂肪饮食,紧张的生活方式,吸烟,感染,基因突变,等。,导致ROS水平升高。前列腺癌,是美国老年男性中最常见的癌症类型,也是美国男性癌症死亡的第二大原因,慢性氧化应激的结果。与高加索裔美国人和其他种族群体相比,非洲裔美国人的前列腺癌发病率和死亡率增加了一倍,表明非洲裔美国男性的前列腺癌差异。在这次审查中,我们主要关注最近五年内ROS在前列腺癌发展和进展中的最新发现,以更新我们在这一领域的理解,因为在2020年之前有一些关于前列腺癌氧化应激和/或炎症的综合文献综述。除了其他已知因素,如社会经济劣势,文化上对医疗系统的不信任,等。在非裔美国人群体中长期存在,我们还总结了最新的证据,这些证据表明,非裔美国人的系统性氧化应激和炎症水平较高,这可能导致该人群的种族前列腺癌差异.
    Reactive oxygen species (ROS) participate in almost all disorders, including cancer. Many factors, including aging, a high-fat diet, a stressful lifestyle, smoking, infection, genetic mutations, etc., lead to elevated levels of ROS. Prostate cancer, the most prevalent type of cancer in senior American men and the second leading cause of cancer mortality in American men, results from chronic oxidative stress. The doubled incident rate as well as the doubled mortality numbers of prostate cancer have persisted in African Americans in comparison with Caucasian Americans and other racial groups, indicating a prostate cancer disparity in African American men. In this review, we mainly focus on the latest findings on ROS in prostate cancer development and progression within the last five years to update our understanding in this area, as several comprehensive literature reviews addressing oxidative stress and/or inflammation in prostate cancer before 2020 are available. In addition to other known factors such as socioeconomic disadvantage, cultural mistrust of the health care system, etc. that are long-existing in the African American group, we also summarize the latest evidence that demonstrated high systemic oxidative stress and inflammation in African Americans for their potential contribution to the racial prostate cancer disparity in this population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在过去的十年中,子宫内膜癌的差异有所增加,黑人女性更有可能在后期被诊断出来,死亡率更高。大多数研究都集中在文化障碍上,社会经济地位,无法获得护理,合并症,和肿瘤组织学来解释这些差异。关于子宫内膜上皮内瘤变(EIN)治疗差异的研究有限。我们试图分析绝经后女性EIN治疗中使用的治疗差异,以评估种族/民族是否是一个促成因素。IRB批准的回顾性研究是在诊断为EIN的单一机构的女性中进行的。种族/种族被定义为非西班牙裔白人,非西班牙裔黑人,西班牙裔,和亚洲人。提取人口统计学和临床数据。多变量逻辑回归用于检查种族/种族与治疗之间的关联,根据年龄调整,BMI,和潜在的医疗条件,如心血管疾病和糖尿病。总的来说,对254例患者进行分析。与非西班牙裔白人女性相比,种族/种族与非西班牙裔黑人女性不太可能接受手术治疗之间存在显着关联(OR=0.326,95CI0.129-0.827,p=0.026)。重要的是,在调整临床危险因素后(年龄,BMI,CVD,糖尿病),非西班牙裔黑人女性不接受手术干预的风险仍然增加(OR=0.333,95%CI0.125-0.882,p=0.027).未来的研究必须评估医疗保健系统中这种差异的根本原因。
    Disparities in endometrial cancer has increased during the past decade with Black women more likely to be diagnosed at a later stage and have higher mortality. The majority of research has been focused on cultural barriers, socioeconomic status, lack of access to care, comorbidities, and tumor histology to explain these disparities. Limited studies have been conducted on the disparity in the treatment of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia(EIN). We sought to analyze the differences in treatment used in the management of postmenopausal women with EIN to evaluate whether race/ethnicity is a contributing factor. An IRB approved retrospective study was conducted amongst women at a single institution diagnosed with EIN. Ethnicity/race was defined as non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, and Asian. Demographic and clinical data was extracted. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the association between ethnicity/race and treatment, adjusted for age, BMI, and underlying medical conditions such as cardiovascular disease and diabetes. In total, 254 patients were analyzed. A significant association between ethnicity/race and treatment with non-Hispanic Black women less likely to be treated with surgical management compared to non-Hispanic White women (OR = 0.326, 95 %CI 0.129-0.827, p = 0.026). Importantly, after adjusting for clinical risk factors(age, BMI, CVD, diabetes), non-Hispanic Black women remained at an increased risk of not undergoing surgical intervention (OR = 0.333, 95 % CI 0.125-0.882, p = 0.027). Future research is imperative to evaluate the root cause of this disparity in the healthcare system.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:脉冲血氧计在红红外波长范围内工作。因此,这些血氧计在深色皮肤受试者和四肢寒冷受试者中产生不稳定的结果。脉搏血氧饱和度通常在发热患者中进行;然而,体温升高会降低血红蛋白对氧的亲和力,导致氧饱和度或氧合血红蛋白浓度下降。
    目的:我们的目的是确定我们的新研究设备,Shani装置或SH1(美国专利11191460),检测到氧饱和度下降或氧合血红蛋白浓度下降。
    方法:在两组中进行了一项观察性研究(第一阶段),以验证血红蛋白和氧浓度的测量值,包括在当前20-40岁的大学生和教职员工中招募的39名参与者。所有志愿者都使用SH1设备和市售食品药品监督管理局批准的脉搏血氧计Masimo完成基线读数。SH1使用两个发光二极管,其中发射波长与氧合血红蛋白(与氧结合的血红蛋白)和脱氧血红蛋白(不含氧的血红蛋白或还原血红蛋白)的吸收峰相匹配。总血红蛋白计算为氧合血红蛋白和脱氧血红蛋白的总和。随后,16名受试者完成了“热套研究”,其他人完成了“献血研究”。“Masimo一直用在手指上进行比较。使用vonLuschan皮肤色标(VLS)和专门设计的算法来计算黑色素水平。我们在这里关注热套研究的结果,受试者穿着双层加热夹克和裤子,包括聚乙烯小管网络以及入口和出口。循环温水以使体温比基线体温高0.5-0.8°C。我们预计在组织水平的加热阶段氧合血红蛋白浓度会略有下降。
    结果:参与者的平均年龄为24.1(SD0.8)岁。VLS上的肤色从12到36不等,代表着均匀分布,三分之一的参与者皮肤白皙,棕色皮肤,和深色皮肤,分别。使用特定的算法和软件,氧合血红蛋白的反射比与直接血红蛋白值一起显示在设备的屏幕上.与脉搏血氧计相比,SH1装置在体温变化后发现氧合血红蛋白水平有更小的变化,检测到的氧合血红蛋白浓度最大下降为6.5%和2.54%,分别。
    结论:我们的新研究设备SH1通过使用绿色波长的反射光谱法测量组织水平的氧饱和度。无论肤色如何,该设备都表现良好。因此,该设备可以消除这些关键生物标志物评估中的种族差异。此外,因为光线照在手腕上,SH1可以容易地小型化为可穿戴设备。
    BACKGROUND: Pulse oximeters work within the red-infrared wavelengths. Therefore, these oximeters produce erratic results in dark-skinned subjects and in subjects with cold extremities. Pulse oximetry is routinely performed in patients with fever; however, an elevation in body temperature decreases the affinity of hemoglobin for oxygen, causing a drop in oxygen saturation or oxyhemoglobin concentrations.
    OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine whether our new investigational device, the Shani device or SH1 (US Patent 11191460), detects a drop in oxygen saturation or a decrease in oxyhemoglobin concentrations.
    METHODS: An observational study (phase 1) was performed in two separate groups to validate measurements of hemoglobin and oxygen concentrations, including 39 participants recruited among current university students and staff aged 20-40 years. All volunteers completed baseline readings using the SH1 device and the commercially available Food and Drug Administration-approved pulse oximeter Masimo. SH1 uses two light-emitting diodes in which the emitted wavelengths match with absorption peaks of oxyhemoglobin (hemoglobin combined with oxygen) and deoxyhemoglobin (hemoglobin without oxygen or reduced hemoglobin). Total hemoglobin was calculated as the sum of oxyhemoglobin and deoxyhemoglobin. Subsequently, 16 subjects completed the \"heat jacket study\" and the others completed the \"blood donation study.\" Masimo was consistently used on the finger for comparison. The melanin level was accounted for using the von Luschan skin color scale (VLS) and a specifically designed algorithm. We here focus on the results of the heat jacket study, in which the subject wore a double-layered heated jacket and pair of trousers including a network of polythene tubules along with an inlet and outlet. Warm water was circulated to increase the body temperature by 0.5-0.8 °C above the baseline body temperature. We expected a slight drop in oxyhemoglobin concentrations in the heating phase at the tissue level.
    RESULTS: The mean age of the participants was 24.1 (SD 0.8) years. The skin tone varied from 12 to 36 on the VLS, representing a uniform distribution with one-third of the participants having fair skin, brown skin, and dark skin, respectively. Using a specific algorithm and software, the reflection ratio for oxyhemoglobin was displayed on the screen of the device along with direct hemoglobin values. The SH1 device picked up more minor changes in oxyhemoglobin levels after a change in body temperature compared to the pulse oximeter, with a maximum drop in oxyhemoglobin concentration detected of 6.5% and 2.54%, respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our new investigational device SH1 measures oxygen saturation at the tissue level by reflectance spectroscopy using green wavelengths. This device fared well regardless of skin color. This device can thus eliminate racial disparity in these key biomarker assessments. Moreover, since the light is shone on the wrist, SH1 can be readily miniaturized into a wearable device.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:健康差异在外科护理中普遍存在。特别是种族和社会经济不平等已经证明在紧急普外科手术的结果,但在选择性腹壁重建术(AWR)中的情况较少。这项研究的目的是评估转诊到三级疝中心的差异。方法:在前瞻性维护的疝数据库中查询2011年至2022年接受开放式腹侧疝(OVHR)或微创手术(MISR)修复的患者,并提供完整的保险和地址信息。根据家庭住址将患者分为州内(IS)和州外(OOS)转诊以及手术技术。比较了人口统计数据和结果。进行标准和推理统计分析。结果:554例患者中,大多数是IS(59.0%);334人接受了OVHR,220人接受了MISR。IS患者更有可能接受MISR(OVHR:45.6%vs.81.5%,腹腔镜:38.2%vs.14.1%,机器人:16.2%vs.4.4%;p<0.001)与OOS转诊相比。OVHR患者,44.6%为IS,55.4%为OOS。患者平均年龄和BMI,性别,ASA得分,IS组和OOS组的保险付款人相似。IS患者更常见的是黑人(白人:77.9%vs.93.5%,黑色:16.8%与4.3%;p<0.001)。IS患者的吸烟者更多(12.1%vs.3.2%;p=0.001),复发性疝较少(45.0%vs.69.7%;p<0.001),和更小的缺陷(155.7±142.2vs.256.4±202.9cm2;p<0.001)。伤口类别,网格类型,筋膜闭合率相似,但IS患者接受脂膜切除术较少(13.4%vs.34.1%;p<0.001),组分分离(26.2%与51.4%;p<0.001),收到较小的网眼(744.2±495.6vs.975.7±442.3cm2;p<0.001),并且住院时间较短(4.8±2.0vs.7.0±5.5天;p<0.001)。伤口破裂没有区别,需要干预的血清肿,血肿,网状感染,或复发;然而,IS患者伤口感染减少(2.0%vs.8.6%;p=0.009),整体伤口并发症(11.4%vs.21.1%;p=0.016),再入院(2.7%与13.0%;p=0.001),和重新手术(3.4%与11.4%;p=0.007)。在MISR患者中,80.9%为IS,19.1%为OOS。与OVHR相比,MISRIS和OOS患者的人口统计学特征相似,术前特征,术中细节,和术后结果。结论:虽然转诊患者的MISR没有差异,这项研究证明了我们的IS和OOS复合体之间存在的种族差异,开放AWR患者。对这些差异的认识可以帮助临床医生努力实现公平获得护理和向三级疝气中心的平等转诊。
    Background: Health disparities are pervasive in surgical care. Particularly racial and socioeconomic inequalities have been demonstrated in emergency general surgery outcomes, but less so in elective abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR). The goal of this study was to evaluate the disparities in referrals to a tertiary hernia center. Methods: A prospectively maintained hernia database was queried for patients who underwent open ventral hernia (OVHR) or minimally invasive surgical (MISR) repair from 2011 to 2022 with complete insurance and address information. Patients were divided by home address into in-state (IS) and out-of-state (OOS) referrals as well as by operative technique. Demographic data and outcomes were compared. Standard and inferential statistical analyses were performed. Results: Of 554 patients, most were IS (59.0%); 334 underwent OVHR, and 220 underwent MISR. IS patients were more likely to undergo MISR (OVHR: 45.6% vs. 81.5%, laparoscopic: 38.2% vs. 14.1%, robotic: 16.2% vs. 4.4%; p < 0.001) when compared to OOS referrals. Of OVHR patients, 44.6% were IS and 55.4% were OOS. Patients\' average age and BMI, sex, ASA score, and insurance payer were similar between IS and OOS groups. IS patients were more often Black (White: 77.9% vs. 93.5%, Black: 16.8% vs. 4.3%; p < 0.001). IS patients had more smokers (12.1% vs. 3.2%; p = 0.001), fewer recurrent hernias (45.0% vs. 69.7%; p < 0.001), and smaller defects (155.7 ± 142.2 vs. 256.4 ± 202.9 cm2; p < 0.001). Wound class, mesh type, and rate of fascial closure were similar, but IS patients underwent fewer panniculectomies (13.4% vs. 34.1%; p < 0.001), component separations (26.2% vs. 51.4%; p < 0.001), received smaller mesh (744.2 ± 495.6 vs. 975.7 ± 442.3 cm2; p < 0.001), and had shorter length-of-stay (4.8 ± 2.0 vs. 7.0 ± 5.5 days; p < 0.001). There was no difference in wound breakdown, seroma requiring intervention, hematoma, mesh infection, or recurrence; however, IS patients had decreased wound infections (2.0% vs. 8.6%; p = 0.009), overall wound complications (11.4% vs. 21.1%; p = 0.016), readmissions (2.7% vs. 13.0%; p = 0.001), and reoperations (3.4% vs. 11.4%; p = 0.007). Of MISR patients, 80.9% were IS and 19.1% were OOS. In contrast to OVHR, MISR IS and OOS patients had similar demographics, preoperative characteristics, intraoperative details, and postoperative outcomes. Conclusion: Although there were no differences in referred patients for MISR, this study demonstrates the racial disparities that exist among our IS and OOS complex, open AWR patients. Awareness of these disparities can help clinicians work towards equitable access to care and equal referrals to tertiary hernia centers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:胰腺癌仍然是美国最致命的癌症之一。某些类型的胰腺囊肿,它们在成像时被更频繁地检测到,有可能发展为胰腺癌,从而为癌症拦截提供了宝贵的机会。尽管已经描述了胰腺癌的种族差异,人们对胰腺癌预防中的健康差异知之甚少。在本研究中,我们调查了胰腺癌治疗连续过程中潜在的健康差异.
    方法:评估了印第安纳州高容量中心胰腺患者的种族和民族构成,代表接受胰腺癌手术的患者(n=390),参与生物基线(972例胰腺癌患者和1984例胰腺疾病患者),或在早期检测中心监测胰腺囊肿(n=1514)。评估与胰腺癌预防和早期发现相关的种族差异和决策的潜在差异。我们通过志愿者注册中心进行了一项探索性在线调查(n=708).结果:我们表明,尽管占印第安纳州或印第安纳波利斯人口的近10%或30%,分别,非洲裔美国人仅占我们研究队列的4-5%,这些研究队列包括接受胰腺手术或参与生物分析和早期检测的患者。对在线调查结果的分析显示,鉴于被诊断为胰腺囊肿或胰腺癌的假设情况,绝大多数受访者(>90%)会同意接受监视或手术,分别,不管种族。只有少数人(3-12%)承认任何重要的运输,金融,或情感障碍会影响进行监视或手术的决定。这表明观察到的种族差异可能部分是由于该决策点上游存在其他障碍。
    结论:种族差异不仅存在于胰腺癌中,而且存在于持续治疗的早期阶段,如预防和早期发现。据我们所知,这是第一项记录有胰腺癌风险的胰腺囊肿患者治疗中种族差异的研究.我们的结果表明,改善对此类高危人群的信息获取和护理可能会带来更公平的结果。
    BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer remains one of the deadliest cancers in the United States. Some types of pancreatic cysts, which are being detected more frequently and often incidentally on imaging, have the potential to develop into pancreatic cancer and thus provide a valuable window of opportunity for cancer interception. Although racial disparity in pancreatic cancer has been described, little is known regarding health disparities in pancreatic cancer prevention. In the present study, we investigate potential health disparities along the continuum of care for pancreatic cancer.
    METHODS: The racial and ethnic composition of pancreatic patients at high-volume centers in Indiana were evaluated, representing patients undergoing surgery for pancreatic cancer (n=390), participating in biobanking (972 pancreatic cancer patients and 1984 patients with pancreatic disease), or being monitored for pancreatic cysts at an early detection center (n=1514). To assess racial disparities and potential differences in decision-making related to pancreatic cancer prevention and early detection, an exploratory online survey was administered through a volunteer registry (n=708).  Results: We show that despite comprising close to 10% or 30% of the Indiana or Indianapolis population, respectively, African Americans make up only about 4-5% of our study cohorts consisting of patients undergoing pancreatic surgery or participating in biobanking and early detection. Analysis of online survey results revealed that given the hypothetical situation of being diagnosed with a pancreatic cyst or pancreatic cancer, the vast majority of respondents (>90%) would agree to undergo surveillance or surgery, respectively, regardless of race. Only a minority (3-12%) acknowledged any significant transportation, financial, or emotional barriers that would impact a decision to undergo surveillance or surgery. This suggests that the observed racial disparities may be due in part to the existence of other barriers that lie upstream of this decision point.
    CONCLUSIONS: Racial disparities exist not only for pancreatic cancer but also at earlier points along the continuum of care such as prevention and early detection. To our knowledge, this is the first study to document racial disparity in the management of patients with pancreatic cysts who are at risk of developing pancreatic cancer. Our results suggest that improving access to information and care for such at-risk individuals may lead to more equitable outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    心血管疾病(CVD)是全球主要的死亡原因。他们的患病率和死亡率继续上升。这篇叙述性综述探讨了众所周知的心血管疾病的危险因素,如血脂异常,高血压,糖尿病,肥胖,吸烟,以及它们在不同种族和族裔群体中的患病率。此外,我们将讨论范围扩大到包括社会经济地位(SES)对心血管结局的影响.数据表明,非西班牙裔黑人和西班牙裔人群不仅表现出更高的高血压发病率,肥胖,糖尿病,和吸烟,但也面临着与较低SES相关的系统性障碍,这恶化了他们的心血管结局。这些障碍包括缺乏教育,收入较低,更高的失业率,和恶劣的生活条件。除了这些通常研究的因素,这些群体的食物和住房不安全程度更高,缺乏足够的保险,所有这些都会导致健康状况恶化。此外,心理健康障碍的患病率更高,比如抑郁和焦虑,在这些人群中。这进一步加剧了与CVD相关的风险和不良后果。必须进一步研究SES和种族如何影响心血管健康并完善风险评估方法。专注于这些方面将有可能创建旨在满足不同社区需求的干预措施,并制定可能降低人群心血管疾病发病率和死亡率的战略。此外,这篇综述主张将全面的社会经济数据纳入心血管健康策略,这对于制定有效的公共卫生举措至关重要。
    Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of death globally. Their prevalence and mortality rates continue to rise. This narrative review explores well-known risk factors for CVDs such as dyslipidemia, hypertension, diabetes, obesity, and smoking, and their prevalence among different racial and ethnic groups. In addition, we expand the discussion to include the impact of socioeconomic status (SES) on cardiovascular outcomes. The data demonstrate that non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic populations not only exhibit higher rates of hypertension, obesity, diabetes, and smoking but also face systemic barriers linked to lower SES, which worsen their cardiovascular outcomes. These barriers include a lack of education, lower income, higher rates of unemployment, and poor living conditions. Beyond these commonly studied factors, these groups also suffer from higher levels of food and housing insecurity and a lack of adequate insurance coverage, all of which contribute to poorer health. Additionally, there is a higher prevalence of mental health disorders, such as depression and anxiety, among these populations. This further compounds the risks and adverse outcomes associated with CVDs. It is essential to conduct further research into how SES and race influence cardiovascular health and to refine risk assessment methods. Concentrating on these aspects would make it possible to create interventions designed to meet the needs of diverse communities and strategies that could potentially reduce morbidity and mortality from CVD across populations. Moreover, this review advocates for integrating comprehensive socioeconomic data into cardiovascular health strategies, which is crucial for developing effective public health initiatives.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    非西班牙裔黑人乳腺癌幸存者的预后较差,死亡率高于白人幸存者。但这些差异背后的系统性生物学机制尚不清楚.我们使用循环白细胞作为测量全身机制的替代品,这可能与目标组织中的过程不同(例如,breast).我们调查了基于种族的DNA损伤和修复差异,使用一种新的CometChip检测方法,来自完成原发性癌症治疗且无癌的乳腺癌幸存者的循环白细胞。我们观察到癌症幸存者系统性DNA损伤和修复活性的新种族差异,但不是健康志愿者的细胞。白人幸存者白细胞的基础DNA损伤更高,但是黑人幸存者在博来霉素治疗后显示出更高的诱导。双链断裂修复活性在种族之间也有显著差异,与黑色白细胞相比,白色幸存者的细胞显示出更持久的修复活性。这些结果表明,癌症和癌症治疗可能对白人幸存者和黑人幸存者不同的系统性DNA损伤和修复机制具有持久的影响。我们在非癌细胞(循环白细胞)中的初步研究结果表明,超出靶位点的全身效应。与加速衰老相关的癌症生存率差异有关。
    Non-Hispanic Black breast cancer survivors have poorer outcomes and higher mortality rates than White survivors, but systemic biological mechanisms underlying these disparities are unclear. We used circulating leukocytes as a surrogate for measuring systemic mechanisms, which might be different from processes in the target tissue (e.g., breast). We investigated race-based differences in DNA damage and repair, using a novel CometChip assay, in circulating leukocytes from breast cancer survivors who had completed primary cancer therapy and were cancer free. We observed novel race-based differences in systemic DNA damage and repair activity in cancer survivors, but not in cells from healthy volunteers. Basal DNA damage in leukocytes was higher in White survivors, but Black survivors showed a much higher induction after bleomycin treatment. Double-strand break repair activity was also significantly different between the races, with cells from White survivors showing more sustained repair activity compared to Black leukocytes. These results suggest that cancer and cancer therapy might have long-lasting effects on systemic DNA damage and repair mechanisms that differ in White survivors and Black survivors. Findings from our preliminary study in non-cancer cells (circulating leukocytes) suggest systemic effects beyond the target site, with implications for accelerated aging-related cancer survivorship disparities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:黑人男性和终末期肾病男性前列腺癌的治疗率较低,死亡率较高。我们研究了终末期肾病(ESKD)与黑人种族对前列腺癌男性的治疗率和死亡率的相互作用。
    结果:我们包括516名黑人和551名白人男性在前列腺癌前患有ESKD22,299名黑人男性,和141821名没有ESKD的白人男性,他们年龄在40岁以上,流行病学,和最终结果医疗保险数据(2004-2016年)。所有有或没有ESKD的黑人男性和有ESKD的白人男性在诊断时的前列腺特异性抗原水平高于没有ESKD的白人男性。与没有ESKD的白人男性相比,患有ESKD的黑人男性在局部和晚期前列腺癌中的治疗率最低(年龄调整后的风险比:0.76,95%置信区间(CI):局部阶段为0.71-0.82,年龄调整后的风险比:0.82,95%CI:0.76-0.9为晚期)。与没有ESKD的白人相比,在局部和晚期均有ESKD的白人男性中,前列腺癌特异性死亡率较高(年龄调整后的风险比:1.8,95%CI:1.2~2.8和HR:1.6,95%CI:1.2~2.2),在晚期前列腺癌中,ESKD黑人男性死亡率较高(年龄调整后的风险比:2.4,95%CI:1.5~3.6).
    结论:我们的研究结果表明,患有ESKD等合并症会使黑人男性在前列腺癌治疗和死亡率方面更容易受到种族差异的影响。
    BACKGROUND: Black men and men with end-stage kidney disease have lower rates of treatment and higher mortality for prostate cancer. We studied the interaction of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) with Black race for treatment rates and mortality for men with prostate cancer.
    RESULTS: We included 516 Black and 551 White men with ESKD before prostate cancer 22,299 Black men, and 141,821 White men without ESKD who were 40 years or older from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Results-Medicare data (2004-2016). All Black men with or without ESKD and White men with ESKD had higher prostate-specific antigen levels at diagnosis than White men without ESKD. Black men with ESKD had the lowest rates for treatment in both local and advanced stages of prostate cancer (age-adjusted risk ratio: 0.76, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.71-0.82 for local stage and age-adjusted risk ratio: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.76-0.9 for advanced stages) compared to White men without ESKD. Compared to White men without ESKD, prostate cancer-specific mortality was higher in White men with ESKD for both local and advanced stages (age-adjusted hazard ratio: 1.8, 95% CI: 1.2-2.8 and HR: 1.6, 95% CI: 1.2-2.2) and it was higher for ESKD Black men only in advanced stage prostate cancer (age-adjusted hazard ratio: 2.4, 95% CI: 1.5-3.6).
    CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that having a comorbidity such as ESKD makes Black men more vulnerable to racial disparities in prostate cancer treatment and mortality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号