Ultrasound has revolutionized reconstructive microsurgery, offering real-time imaging and enhanced precision allowing for preoperative flap planning, recipient vessel identification and selection, postoperative flap monitoring, and lymphatic surgery. This narrative review of the literature provides an updated evidence-based overlook on the current applications and emerging frontiers of ultrasound in microsurgery, focusing on free tissue transfer and lymphatic surgery. Color duplex ultrasound (CDU) plays a pivotal role in preoperative flap planning and design, providing real-time imaging that enables detailed perforator mapping, perforator suitability assessment, blood flow velocity measurement, and, ultimately, flap design optimization. Ultrasound also aids in recipient vessel selection by providing assessment of caliber, patency, location, and flow velocity of recipient vessels. Postoperatively, ultrasound enables real-time monitoring of flap perfusion, providing early detection of potential flap compromise and improved flap survival rates. In lymphatic surgery, ultra-high frequency ultrasound (UHFUS) offers precise mapping and evaluation of lymphatic vessels, improving efficacy and efficiency by targeting larger dilated vessels. Integrating ultrasound into reconstructive microsurgery represents a significant advancement in the utilization of imaging in the field. With growing accessibility of devices, improved training, and technological advancements, using ultrasound as a key imaging tool offers substantial potential for the evolution of reconstructive microsurgery.

UNASSIGNED: Perforator flaps have revolutionized autologous breast reconstruction, introducing both free and pedicled options as well as the potential for combining flaps. These versatile techniques can be utilized in massive weight loss (MWL) patients, effectively addressing both functional and aesthetic challenges by using their excess skin. This review aims to explore literature on combined pedicled and free perforator flaps for total breast reconstruction, and share our own experience in the field.
UNASSIGNED: A PubMed search up to June 2023 employed Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms such as ((\"combined\") OR (\"stacked\") OR (\"conjoined\") AND (\"perforator flaps\")) AND (\"breast reconstruction\"). Publications in English and Scandinavian languages were manually screened for relevance, and supplemental sources were also reviewed.
UNASSIGNED: Limited studies exist on using combined pedicled and free flaps for total breast reconstruction, although combined free flaps are more common. Perforators around the breast base, offer multiple flap options for single or combined use. In our series of 10 women, four underwent total breast reconstruction with a combination of flip-over internal mammary artery perforator (IMAP) flap and thoracodorsal artery perforator (TDAP) flap. Another subset of four, who were MWL patients, received combined TDAP and superior epigastric artery perforator (SEAP) flaps, along with body contouring procedures such as upper body lifts and vertical abdominoplasties, addressing excess skin and improving silhouette. One remaining MWL patient had deflated breasts restored using TDAP and SEAP flaps, along with an upper and lower body lift and vertical abdominoplasty. The last MWL patient underwent a risk-reducing mastectomy, also reconstructed with TDAP and SEAP flaps, and received an upper body lift and vertical abdominoplasty.
UNASSIGNED: Combined perforator flap techniques for combined body contouring and breast reconstruction seems safe and especially suitable for MWL patients. They offer a surgical alternative merging body contouring and breast reconstruction in cases where free flap procedures seem less favorable due to skin laxity and deflation of donor sites. However, limited literature on the topic calls for further studies.

Background: The aim of this study was to examine the potential benefit that may be achieved through the introduction of technical innovations and the incorporation of mesh for fascial donor site closure in uni- and bilateral autologous breast reconstruction with abdominal tissue. Methods: A retrospective single-center review of all breast reconstructions with a DIEP or MS-TRAM flap between January 2004 and December 2019 was performed. Donor and recipient site complications and operation times were evaluated before and after the implementation of coupler anastomoses, preoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA), indocyanine green (ICG) angiography, and the inclusion of mesh in donor site repair. Results: A total of 396 patients were included, accounting for 447 flaps. Operation time was significantly shorter in unilateral reconstructions after the implementation of CTA (p < 0.0001). ICG angiography significantly reduced the rates of partial flap loss (p = 0.02) and wound healing disorders (p = 0.02). For unilateral reconstructions, abdominal bulging or hernia was observed more often in MS1-TRAM flaps without synthetic mesh repair (p = 0.001), whereas conservatively treated seroma developed more frequently after mesh implantation (p = 0.03). Conclusions: Recent technological advancements developed over the past few decades have made a substantial impact on decreasing surgical duration and enhancing procedure safety.

This study aimed to analyze cases of anterolateral thigh (ALT) free flap used for hand reconstruction with terminal perforator-to-digital artery anastomosis. Patients who underwent ALT free flap placement with terminal perforator-to-digital artery anastomosis for hand reconstruction between January 2011 and August 2021 were included. The number, length, and diameter of the perforators and veins, flap size, and operative time were investigated through a retrospective review of charts and photographs. The occurrences of arterial thrombosis, venous thrombosis, arterial spasm, and flap necrosis were analyzed. In total, 50 patients were included in this study. The mean diameter and length of the perforators were 0.68 mm and 3.25 cm, respectively, and the mean number of veins anastomosed was 1.88, with a mean diameter of 0.54 mm. Complications included four cases of arterial thrombosis, one case of venous thrombosis, seven cases of partial necrosis, and one case of total flap failure. Regression analysis showed that a longer perforator was associated with arterial thrombosis whereas larger flap size and number of anastomosed veins were associated with partial necrosis ( p  < 0.05). The terminal perforator-to-digital artery anastomosis offers advantages in using compact free flaps with short pedicle lengths to cover small hand defects.

UNASSIGNED: In this study, we evaluate the versatility of smartphone thermal imaging technology as a valuable intraoperative modality in different stages of perforator flap surgery aiming to minimize the complications and achieve the best postoperative outcome.
UNASSIGNED: Thermography was performed in 20 perforator flaps in 20 patients at different surgical stages in three different ways to identify the most dominant perforator: first, by measuring the surface temperature of the skin; second, by using the dynamic infrared thermography technique; and third, by assessing the perfusion pattern when the flap was supplied by each perforator separately. Thermography was used to help in discarding the least perfused area of the flap. After microvascular anastomosis, the flap reheating pattern was evaluated.
UNASSIGNED: Seventeen free and three pedicled perforator flaps were included. Intraoperatively, each of the selected perforators had a corresponding hotspot. The perforator with the hottest hotpot, best rewarming, and provision of best flap perfusion on thermography was found clinically dominant. After microvascular anastomosis in free flaps, rapid rewarming was recorded in 15 cases. In two deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps, no rapid rewarming was observed. The pedicle was kinked in one case and there was a venous insufficiency in another case that required a cephalic turndown. All flaps showed good perfusion on thermography after inset.
UNASSIGNED: Smartphone thermography has proven to be a valuable, cheap, rapidly employed, and objective tool not only for the design of perforator flaps, but also for the decision making intraoperatively to achieve the best surgical outcome.

Abdominoperineal amputation (AAP) is a gold standard procedure treating advanced abdominal and pelvic cancers. The defect resulting from this extensive surgery must be reconstructed to avoid complications, such as infection, dehiscence, delayed healing, or even death. Several approaches can be chosen depending on the patient. Muscle-based reconstructions are a reliable solution but are responsible for additional morbidity for these fragile patients. We present and discuss our experience in AAP reconstruction using gluteal-artery-based propeller perforator flaps (G-PPF) in a case series. Between January 2017 and March 2021, 20 patients received G-PPF reconstruction in two centers. Either superior gluteal artery (SGAP)- or inferior artery (IGAP)-based perforator flaps were performed depending on the best configuration. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were collected. A total of 23 G-PPF were performed-12 SGAP and 11 IGAP flaps. Final defect coverage was achieved in 100% of cases. Eleven patients experienced at least one complication (55%), amongst whom six patients (30%) had delayed healing, and three patients (15%) had at least one flap complication. One patient underwent a new surgery at 4 months for a perineal abscess under the flap, and three patients died from disease recurrence. Gluteal-artery-based propeller perforator flaps are an effective and modern surgical procedure for AAP reconstruction. Their mechanic properties, in addition to their low morbidity, make them an optimal technique for this purpose; however, technical skills are needed, and closer surveillance with patient compliance is critical to ensure success. G-PPF should be widely used in specialized centers and considered a modern alternative to muscle-based reconstructions.

Background  Hypothenar free flaps (HTFFs) have been widely used for reconstructing palmar defects. Although previous anatomical and clinical studies of HTFF have been conducted, this technique still has some limitations. In this study, we describe some tips for large flap design that allows for easy harvesting of HTFFs with minimal donor site morbidity. Methods  A total of 14 HTFF for hand defect reconstruction were recorded. The oblique flap was designed in the proximal HT area following relaxed skin tension line along the axis between fourth web space and 10 mm ulnar side of pisiform. A flap pedicle includes one or two perforators with ulnar digital artery and HT branch of basilic vein. In addition, innervated HTFF can be harvested with a branch of ulnar digital nerve. Electronic medical records were reviewed to obtain data on patients\' information, operative details, and follow-up period. In addition, surgical outcome score was obtained from the patient, up to 10 points, at the last follow-up. Results  Mean harvest time was 46 minutes, and two perforators were included in 10 cases. The mean flap area was 10.84 cm 2 . There were no problems such as donor site depression, scar contracture, keloids, wound dehiscence, numbness or neuroma pain at donor sites, and hypersensitivity or cold intolerance at flap site, either functionally or aesthetically. Conclusion  Palmar defect reconstruction is challenging for hand surgeons. However, large HTFF can be harvested without complications using the oblique axis HTFF technique. We believe our surgical tips increase utility of HTFF for palmar defect reconstruction.

Perforator flaps are the latest development in reconstructive surgery. Pedicled chest wall perforator flaps can be utilized in many cases of partial breast reconstruction. This research compares the outcome and technique of thoracodorsal artery perforator flap (TDAP) and the lateral intercostal artery perforator flap (LICAP) in the reconstruction of partial breast defects. Patient records were reviewed for the time period between 2011 and 2019 at the Breast Unit of the National Cancer Institute of Cairo University. Eighty three patients were accessible for the study. (46 cases of TDAP flap and 37 cases of LICAP flap). Relevant clinical data were extracted from patients\' records. A special visit was organized for all 83 patients, where a digital photograph was taken in an antroposterior view. The photographs were later processed via BCCT.core software to obtain an objective cosmetic outcome assessment. Complication rates and cosmetic outcome were comparable for both techniques. TDAP flap proved to require more tedious dissection and preoperative Doppler mapping to localize perforator vessels. On the other hand, LICAP was technically easier with more consistent perforators. Pedicled chest wall perforator flaps constitute an excellent reconstructive option in partial breast defects. TDAP flap and LICAP are two reliable perforator flaps which can reconstruct outer breast defects with acceptable outcome.

Background: Reconstruction with the use of perforator flaps makes it possible to make the skin surface resistant to the influence of mechanical factors and as similar to the lost skin cover as possible. However, while planning any flap, along with the design of the required shape and size, its blood supply should be taken into account to ensure optimal viability. Therefore, the task to precisely determine the topographic-anatomical relationships suitable for the formation of a pedicle of perforators is still relevant. The aim of this study was to increase the efficiency of surgical reconstruction of wound defects by transposition of locoregional perforator flaps. Methods: The authors conducted a retrospective analysis of 72 cases of reconstruction by means of locoregional perforator flaps with vascular pedicle detachment to determine the efficiency of preoperative diagnostic preparation with the help of multidetector-row computed tomographic angiography (MDCT) in the process of reconstruction. Thirty-seven individual cases of surgical interventions were chosen using a case-controlled study from the study group when MDCT with angiography was used for preoperative planning of perforator flaps, as well as 35 control cases similar in terms of important predictive peculiarities with the reconstruction at the same level of difficulty. The patient groups were precisely matched by gender (P = .950), age (P = .804), flap area (P = .192), and type of reconstruction that was performed. Results: In all cases, the location of the perforator with a diameter greater than 1.0 mm was marked. All perforators determined during MDCT scanning were faultlessly localized intraoperatively. The distance between the intraoperative position of the perforator and the position obtained in the result of the examination did not exceed 1 cm. There was no need to change the planned design of the flap intraoperatively. In all cases where MDCT was performed, the duration of the surgical procedure varied from 60 to 150 minutes (average: 120.77 [18.90] minutes) and was reduced by 49.40 minutes (95% CI: 39.17-59.63) compared with the patients who did not undergo preoperative visualization of perforators where the average duration of the operation was 170.17 (19.19) minutes (from 140 to 220 minutes). Among the patients examined by MDCT, surgical complications were noted in 5 cases (13.51%) compared to 14 cases (40.00%) in the control group. Conclusions: The preoperative MDCT for the locoregional perforator flap reconstruction makes it possible to increase the efficiency of patient treatment given the reduction in surgery duration by 49.40 minutes (95% CI: 39.17-59.63) on average and the reduction in the level of postsurgery complications from 40% to 13.5% compared with the group of patients in whom presurgical visualization was not performed (P = .031).
Contexte : La reconstruction faisant appel à des lambeaux perforants permet de rendre la surface de la peau résistante à l’influence de facteurs mécaniques et de la rendre aussi semblable que possible à la couverture cutanée perdue. Cependant, tout en planifiant un lambeau, son approvisionnement en sang doit être pris en compte au même titre que sa forme et sa taille pour assurer une viabilité optimale. Par conséquent, la tâche visant à déterminer avec précision les rapports topographiques-anatomiques convenables pour la formation d’un pédicule perforateur reste pertinente. L’objectif de cette étude était d’augmenter l’efficacité de la reconstruction chirurgicale des lacunes post-blessures par transposition de volets perforateurs locorégionaux. Méthodes : Les auteurs ont réalisé une analyse rétrospective de 72 cas de reconstruction utilisant le détachement d’un pédicule vasculaire de volets perforateurs locorégionaux pour déterminer l’efficacité de la préparation diagnostique préopératoire aidée par la tomoangiographie numérisée à multidétecteurs (MDCT) dans le processus de reconstruction. 37 cas individuels d’interventions chirurgicales ont été choisis dans une étude cas-contrôles à partir du groupe d’étude quand la tomoangiographie numérisée à multidétecteurs a été utilisée pour la planification préopératoire des lambeaux perforants. 35 cas-contrôles similaires en termes de particularismes prédictifs importants pour la reconstruction avec le même niveau de difficulté. Les groupes de patients ont été appariés avec précision pour le genre (P = 0,950), l’âge (P = 0,804), la surface du lambeau (P = 0,192) et le type de reconstruction qui était exécuté. Résultats : Dans tous les cas, l’emplacement du perforateur avec un diamètre supérieur à 1 mm a été marqué. Tous les perforateurs déterminés au cours de la MDCT ont été localisés sans erreur en peropératoire. La distance entre la position peropératoire du perforateur et la position obtenue dans le résultat de l’examen n’a pas dépassé 1 cm. Il n’a pas été nécessaire de modifier le plan prévu du lambeau en peropératoire. Dans tous les cas où la MDCT a été réalisée, la durée de la procédure chirurgicale a été de 60 à 150 minutes (moyenne, 120,77 [18,90] minutes) et a été réduite de 49,40 minutes (IC à 95%: 39,17 à 59,63) comparativement aux patients qui n’ont pas eu de visualisation préopératoire des perforateurs; pour ces derniers, la durée de l’intervention a été de 170,17 (19,19) minutes (de 140 à 220 minutes). Parmi les patients examinés par MDCT, des complications chirurgicales ont été observées dans 5 cas (13,51%) comparativement à 14 cas (40,00%) dans le groupe témoin. Conclusions : La MDCT préopératoire pour la reconstruction avec lambeau perforateur locorégional permet d’améliorer l’efficacité du traitement des patients compte tenu de la réduction des temps opératoires de 49,40 minutes (IC à 95%, 39,17 à 59,63) en moyenne et de la réduction de 40% à 13,5% des complications postopératoires comparativement au groupe de patients n’ayant pas bénéficié de visualisation avant l’intervention (P = 0,031).

BACKGROUND: The lateral thoracic area is a known source for perforator flaps for partial breast reconstruction. In this paper, we report our experience in designing and harvesting lateral thoracic perforator flaps for partial and total breast reconstruction with the introduction of the \"propuller\" concept.
METHODS: Between September 2013 and August 2021, 95 flaps were performed for immediate, partial and total breast reconstruction. On a total of 95 flaps, 30 (19 thoracodorsal artery perforator(TDAP) flaps, 10 lateral intercostal artery perforator(LICAP) flaps and 1 lateral thoracic artery perforator(LTAP) flap) were harvested in the traditional fashion (control group) and 65 (57 LICAP, 2 LTAP and 6 TDAP flaps) according to the propeller concept (study group). All cases were preoperatively planned with Color-Coded Duplex Ultrasound.
RESULTS: No flap losses were experienced in both groups. The mean operative time was 156 minutes (range 118-234) for the control group and 75 minutes (range 53-125) for the study group (p < 0.0001). A significantly higher number of LICAP flaps were chosen in the study group compared to control group. None of the patients had donor site complications. Patients\' and Surgeons\' satisfaction was high to very high.
CONCLUSIONS: The ultrasound preoperative planning led to the development of an easier and safer method of local perforator flap harvesting, that we named as propuller design. Its novelty lies in that perforator intraoperative selection and fully skeletonization are not needed and a more efficient flap movement (propeller plus advancement) which transfers more tissue into the new breast can be achieved safely, faster and easier.