Introduction Academic coaching fosters self-directed learning and is growing in popularity within residency programs. Implementation is often limited by available faculty time and funding. Peer coaching is an emerging alternative but is not well studied. This study aims to demonstrate the acceptability, feasibility, and efficacy of a resident peer coaching program. Methodology In the 2021-2022 academic year, within a large pediatric residency program, we selected and trained senior residents as coaches and interns who opted in as coachees. Coaching dyads began meeting in the fall and worked toward individualized goals throughout the year; control interns participated in routine didactics. Outcomes included Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) milestone scores and a self-assessment survey (SAS). Results We enrolled 15/42 (36%) interns as coachees, with the remaining 27 (64%) as controls. Narrative feedback from coaches and coachees was overall positive, and time commitment was feasible for program staff (10-12 hours/month), coaches (three to four hours/month), and coachees (one to two hours/month) with minimal financial needs. Post-intervention, more coachees than controls scored ≥4.0 on ACGME milestones systems-based practice 3 (SBP3; 3/15, 20%, vs. 2/27, 7%), SBP4 (4/15, 27%, vs. 5/27, 19%), and practice-based learning and improvement 1 (4/15, 27%, vs. 3/27, 11%). SAS response rate was 8/15 (53%) for coachees and 5/27 (19%) for controls. More coachees than controls reported baseline difficulty with time management often (3/8, 38%, vs. 1/5, 20%); only coachees improved post-intervention, with 0/8 (0%) having difficulty often versus 2/5 (40%) of controls. Conclusions Resident peer coaching is acceptable and feasible to implement. Coachees reported more improvement in time management than controls, and ACGME milestone scores suggest improved use of evidence-based medicine and interprofessional care coordination among coachees.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this exploratory survey is to describe the current state of US (ultrasound) technique across different pediatric settings nationwide.
METHODS: A questionnaire was emailed to all members of the Italian Society of Pediatrics, including pediatric residents. The survey was open from December 2021 to March 2022.
RESULTS: There were 1098 respondents. Seven hundred and seven pediatricians (84.1%) reported any use of US, while 51 (44.3%) residents denied it. The majority of participants (n = 956, 87.1%) reported to have a US machine available within the department, mostly cart-based (n = 516, 66.9%) and provided from 1 to 5 years prior to the survey (n = 330, 42.8%). Lung and neonatal cerebral regions were the most frequently scanned (n = 289, 18.7% and n = 218, 14.1%, respectively). The suspicion of pneumonia or respiratory distress represented the main reasons for performing US in emergency room (n = 390, 78% and n = 330, 66%, respectively). The majority of family pediatricians reported to scan lung and kidney/urinary tract regions (n = 30, 16.9%, and n = 23,12.9%, respectively). Regarding US training, the majority of respondents (n = 358, 34.6%) declared an experience-based education, with a deficient certification enabling the use of US in 71.6% (n = 552) of cases. The most common barriers included the lack of a well-defined training program (n = 627, 57.1%), unavailability of the US machine (n = 196, 17.9%) and legal responsibility concern (n = 175, 15.9%).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the growing interest on pediatric US nationally, significant barriers still limit widespread adoption. These obstacles may be addressed through the dissemination of a specific US education plan and providing additional resources.

OBJECTIVE: There is little data evaluating procedural skills in current rural pediatric practices. In order to prepare a cadre of pediatricians to work in rural settings, we require an understanding of the unique procedural skills needed by rural pediatric providers. Our objective was to determine how often pediatricians performed various procedural skills, determine the importance of these skills to current practice, and how they differ between rural and urban pediatric providers.
METHODS: A survey evaluating pediatrician utilization of the 13 required Accreditation Council Graduate Medical Education procedural skills in current practice was developed and distributed to pediatric providers in New Mexico. Descriptive statistics were used to profile participants and describe survey responses. Chi-square tests were used to evaluate differences by urban setting or IHS. Fisher\'s exact test was employed to assess differences if cell sizes were less than five. All p-values were two sided with alpha=.05. Benjamini-Hochberg method was used to control for type 1 errors.
RESULTS: Fifty-two of 216 pediatric providers responded. The majority surveyed performed each of the 13 procedures less than monthly but competency in many of these procedures is important. Thirty-two respondents submitted free-text responses recommending competence with tracheostomy changes, gastrostomy-tube changes/cares, and circumcision.
CONCLUSIONS: Majority of surveyed pediatricians performed the required procedures less than monthly but deemed several procedures to be important. Rural pediatricians recommended specific procedural skills needed in rural practice. All trainees receive procedural skills training. However, trainees interested in rural practice may need additional training in specific skills different than their non-rural counterparts.

BACKGROUND: General pediatricians often initially address children\'s musculoskeletal (MSK) issues and play a crucial role in triaging and managing patients\' rheumatologic conditions. This study assessed the effectiveness of a structured curriculum in enhancing pediatric residents\' knowledge, MSK examination skills, and confidence during a 4-week pediatric rheumatology rotation.
METHODS: Pediatric residents in their either second or third year who participated in the 4-week rheumatology rotation once across three academic years (July 2020-June 2023) were enrolled. Residents\' knowledge, MSK examination skills, and confidence were assessed at pre- and post-rotation by using 25 multiple-choice questions, the Thai pediatric Gait Arms Legs Spine examination, and a questionnaire, respectively. The curriculum comprised instruction on MSK examinations, interactive lectures, case-based discussion, topic reviews, MSK radiology conference, clinical experience in rheumatology clinic and consultations, with self-guided learning with educational resources.
RESULTS: Fifty-eight pediatric residents (48 females, 10 males) with a mean age of 28.9 ± 0.8 years participated. Significant improvements were noted postrotation. Knowledge scores rose from 63.0 ± 12.2 to 79.7 ± 9.1 (mean difference 16.7 ± 10.3, p < 0.001). Similarly, MSK examination scores increased from 67.5 ± 14.4 to 93.6 ± 8.7 (mean difference 26.1 ± 14.6, p < 0.001). Residents also reported a marked increase in confidence across all evaluated areas, including history taking, MSK examination, arthrocentesis, and diagnosing and treating rheumatologic conditions (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The 4-week structured curriculum in the pediatric rheumatology rotation significantly enhanced pediatric residents\' knowledge, MSK examination skills, and confidence. These findings support the integration of pediatric rheumatology rotations into pediatric residency training programs.

OBJECTIVE: Pediatric residency trainees interface with electrocardiograms (EKG) as part of routine clinical care. Depending on workflow and availability of support staff, trainees may be required to obtain EKGs on patients, though training on this skill varies. Our intervention seeks to train incoming pediatric residents on obtaining EKGs from pediatric patients and identifying common problems that may result in acquisition of low-fidelity EKGs.
METHODS: A team of physicians, EKG technicians, and simulation educators designed a 30-min didactic and experiential learning opportunity for incoming pediatric trainees held prior to their start of clinical responsibilities. During the session, trainees were introduced to the basics of EKG acquisition and common quality issues that arise. Afterwards, they practiced placing EKG leads on a mannequin and a live model. A pre- and post-session survey was utilized to assess the session\'s utility and participant\'s learning.
RESULTS: The intervention was perceived as a valuable experience by participants over the course of 2 years. We found increased participant comfort with performing and troubleshooting EKGs (P<.001). There was a 33% improvement in quality assessment of EKG rhythm strips after the session (P<.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Given the importance of EKGs to the care of pediatric patients, it is essential that pediatricians receive adequate training in acquiring and assessing EKG quality. This intervention was deemed to be highly useful with a demonstrated improvement in EKG troubleshooting skills among first year pediatric residents. This session improves learner comfort with essential clinical responsibilities and identification of low-quality EKGs that often warrant repeat testing.

Background and objective Emergency medical services (EMS) are often assumed to only involve bringing patients to physicians for treatment in the emergency department. However, EMS staff are also responsible for responding to physicians in the primary care setting when medical emergencies arise. While emergency medicine (EM) residents are exposed to EMS as part of their curriculum, little is known about the knowledge of other resident physicians who may interact with EMS. In light of this, we conducted this study to address the scarcity of data related to this topic. Methods A quantitative cross-sectional knowledge assessment was conducted among resident physicians in emergency medicine, internal medicine, family medicine, pediatric, and combined medicine and pediatric residencies at the Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center. Results Eighteen EM residents and 26 non-EM residents completed the assessment. The EM residents had a higher average score when compared to non-emergency medicine residents (69.2% vs. 53.8%, p=0.0012). Conclusion Variations in scores between EM and other specialties that interact with EMS highlight the need for further training and familiarization related to EMS for residents in non-EM specialties.

We sought to evaluate changes in In-Training Examination (ITE) scores and associations with clinical work during the COVID-19 pandemic. We hypothesized that residents saw a decrease in clinical encounters during the pandemic and that this would be associated with smaller gains in ITE scores.
We compared ITE score changes with data on patient notes for three classes of pediatric residents at four residency programs: one not exposed to the pandemic during their intern year who entered residency in 2018, one partially exposed to COVID-19 in March of their intern year (2019-2020), and one that was fully exposed to the pandemic, starting residency in June of 2020.
ITE scores on average improved from the PGY1 to PGY2 year in the \"no covid\" and \"partial COVID\" cohorts. The \"full COVID\" cohort had little to no improvement, on average. The total number of patient encounters was not associated with a change in ITE scores from PGY1 to PGY2. There was a small but statistically significant association between change in ITE score and number of inpatient H+P notes.
A drop in ITE scores occurred in pediatric residents who entered residency during the COVID-19 pandemic. This change was largely unrelated to clinical encounter number changes.

OBJECTIVE: Residency recruitment events and interviews are widely considered an integral component of the residency match experience. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, residency recruitment and interviewing throughout the 2020-2021 academic year were performed virtually, which created challenges for applicants\' ability to discern \"fit\" to a program. Given this change, it is reasonable to suspect that applicants would be less able to discern program fit. Therefore, this study evaluated how virtual interviews impacted pediatric residency applicants\' ability to assess factors contributing to fit and subsequently how applicants assessed their self-perceived fit to their top-ranked programs.
METHODS: An online, anonymous survey was distributed to all residency applicants who applied to any specialty at our large academic institution. The survey utilized a 5-point Likert-type scale to evaluate qualities of fit as well as the applicants\' self-perceived ability to assess these qualities through a virtual platform.
RESULTS: 1,840 surveys were distributed, of which 473 residency applicants responded (25.7% response rate). Among these responses, 81 were pediatric applicants (27.6%). Factors deemed most important in determining fit included how well the residents get along with one another (98.8%), how much the program appeared to care about its trainees (97.5%), and how satisfied residents were with their program (97.5%). Qualities deemed most difficult for applicants to discern included the quality of facilities (18.6%), patient diversity (29.4%), and how well the residents got along with one another (30.2%). When compared to all other residency applicants, pediatric applicants placed more value on whether a program was family-friendly (p = 0.015), the quality of the facilities (p = 0.009), and the on-call system (p = 0.038).
CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights factors that influence pediatric applicants\' perception of fit into a program. Unfortunately, many factors deemed most important for pediatric applicants were also among the most difficult to assess virtually. These include resident camaraderie, whether a program cares about its residents, and overall resident satisfaction. Taken together, these findings and the recommendations presented should be considered by all residency program leaders to ensure the successful recruitment of a pediatric residency class.

Background Prior studies showed that point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) training is not commonly offered in pediatric residency. We assessed the need for a pediatric POCUS curriculum by evaluating pediatric trainees\' attitudes toward the use of POCUS and identifying barriers to training. We also aimed to evaluate the impact of a POCUS educational intervention on self-efficacy and behavior. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional survey of pediatric residents in a single large freestanding children\'s hospital distributed via an institutional listserv and administered online. The survey included opinion-rating of statements regarding POCUS and barriers to training. We also offered a two-week POCUS course with online modules and hands-on scanning. Participating residents completed pre- and post-course knowledge assessments and follow-up surveys up to 12 months following the course to assess POCUS use and self-report confidence on POCUS indications, acquisition, interpretation, and clinical application. Results Forty-nine respondents were included in the survey representing all three pediatric levels with 16 specialty interest areas. Ninety-six percent of trainees reported that POCUS is an important skill in pediatrics. Ninety-two percent of trainees reported that residency programs should teach residents how to use POCUS. The most important perceived barriers to POCUS training were scheduling availability for POCUS rotations and lack of access to an ultrasound machine. Fourteen participants completed the pre- and post-course knowledge tests, with eight and six participants also completing the six- and 12-month follow-up surveys, respectively. Self-ratings of confidence were significantly improved post-intervention in indications (P = 0.007), image acquisition (P = 0.002), interpretation (P = 0.002), and clinical application (P = 0.004). This confidence improvement was sustained up to 6-12 months (P = 0.004-0.032). Participants also reported higher categorical POCUS use after course completion (P = 0.031). Conclusions Pediatric trainees perceive POCUS as an important skill, hold favorable opinions towards the use of POCUS, and support POCUS training within a pediatric residency. A POCUS course can improve resident POCUS knowledge, instill confidence, and motivate higher POCUS use. Further study is needed to evaluate POCUS applications in pediatric medicine to develop a standardized POCUS curriculum and establish a training guideline for pediatric residency.

暂无摘要。