Intraperitoneal focal fat infarction (IFFI) is a rare condition characterized by infarction of fatty tissue within the abdominal cavity. Lesser omental infarction, a relatively rare type of IFFI, occurs when there is an infarction of fat within the lesser omentum. Patients typically present with acute abdominal pain that can mimic more serious conditions. This case report highlights the clinical presentation, diagnostic challenges, and management strategies for patients presenting to the emergency department with lesser omental infarction. A 63-year-old female presented to the emergency department with a chief complaint of epigastric abdominal pain that had been persisting for approximately a week and a half. The pain, which initially seemed like a sore muscle, became increasingly sharp and intermittent, with tenderness upon palpation of the epigastric area. Computed tomography (CT) imaging revealed an omental infarct in the lesser sac with focal inflammation in the fat of the lesser omentum. Through conservative management with analgesics and anti-inflammatory medication, the patient experienced resolution of her symptoms within a few days and had a follow-up with the gastrointestinal team several weeks later. Lesser omental infarction typically results from compromised blood flow due to torsion or thrombosis, leading to ischemia and necrosis of the fatty tissue. CT imaging is crucial for its diagnosis and reveals fat-density lesions with surrounding inflammatory changes. Conservative management is typically effective, though in rare cases, surgical intervention may be necessary when significant vital signs and electrolyte derangements occur.

Omental infarction is an uncommon cause of abdominal pain. The condition is often misdiagnosed due to its clinical similarity to more common abdominal pathologies like appendicitis and cholecystitis. This report presents the case of a 57-year-old female with a one-week history of left-sided abdominal pain, initially aggravated by eating and defecation. The patient, a long-term smoker with a complex medical history that includes deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, was hemodynamically stable on presentation. A CT scan revealed a nodular infiltration consistent with an omental infarct. Conservative management was pursued, resulting in symptom resolution by the third day of hospitalization. This case underscores the diagnostic challenges associated with omental infarction, particularly its differentiation from other causes of acute abdominal pain. It highlights the importance of considering rare etiologies in patients with atypical presentations and emphasizes the role of imaging, particularly CT scans, in accurate diagnosis. The patient\'s successful conservative management aligns with current recommendations, which advocate for non-surgical treatment in most cases. This approach avoids unnecessary surgical interventions and ensures a favorable prognosis with low complication rates in patients with prompt and appropriate management.

UNASSIGNED: Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare cancer that is associated with asbestos exposure. The diagnosis can be difficult given the nonspecific nature of presenting symptoms and the presence of concomitant confounding findings.
UNASSIGNED: We report a 71-year-old male who presented with right lower quadrant pain and new-onset ascites. CT imaging of the abdomen/pelvis demonstrated omental stranding concerning for a possible omental infarction. Subsequent imaging showed persistent omental edema but no identifiable soft tissue mass. A biopsy of the omentum showed atypical mesothelial proliferation, but pathology was unable to determine if proliferation was a neoplastic versus reactive process. Surgical oncology performed a diagnostic laparoscopy that showed peritoneal studding of the omentum. Subsequent immunohistochemical staining of the omentum demonstrated preservation of BAP1 expression and loss of MTAP expression, consistent with peritoneal mesothelioma.
UNASSIGNED: MPM is a rare and aggressive cancer with an overall poor prognosis. The diagnosis of MPM can be difficult based on the nonspecific clinical presentation, insufficient imaging and laboratory testing, and the presence of concomitant confounding findings, such as with this patient and his admitting diagnosis of omental infarction. This case demonstrates the importance of developing a broad differential while maintaining an awareness of heuristics that can influence clinical decision-making.

UNASSIGNED: Omental infarction (OI) is an uncommon cause of acute abdominal pain. A high index of clinical suspicion is required for diagnosis of OI as the incidence is less than 1 %, presenting with abdominal pain. We report primary OI\'s clinical and radiological profile from a single tertiary care hospital in India.
UNASSIGNED: In this retrospective cross-sectional study, the electronic medical and radiology records of patients with abdominal pain were reviewed over seven years (2015-2022). Variables were systematically collected and analyzed.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 22 patients diagnosed with primary OI were included in this study. Male preponderance (63.6 %) was noted with a mean age of 47.45 years (SD ± 13.84; range: 18-72 years). Most patients belonged to class I obesity (according to the Asia-Pacific body mass index classification) with a mean BMI of 26.56 kg/m2 (SD ± 3.21 kg/m2). All patients had abdominal pain as the primary symptom, with a mean duration of 8.64 days (SD ± 10.15; range: 1-42 days). The most common locations of pain were the right hypochondrium (27.3 %) and diffuse (27.3 %), followed by the right iliac fossa (18.1 %). Most (95.45 %, n=21/22) patients were treated conservatively, and only one required surgical intervention.
UNASSIGNED: Primary OI is a rare and benign cause of acute abdomen. Obesity is a risk factor but does not correlate with the size or severity of OI. Radiological imaging, like a computed tomography (CT) scan, is essential for diagnosis. A conservative management line should be the first approach in treating primary OI before considering surgical options.

UNASSIGNED: Omental infarction is a rare pediatric disease. Ultrasound is a useful modality for a non-invasive pre-operative differential diagnosis between inflammatory conditions (as appendicitis) and omental infarction, especially by detecting immobility of the omentum adhered to the abdominal wall (\"tetherd fat sign\"). However, this is a dynamic sign that cannot be documented in a static image with B-mode technique. The goal of this work is to incorporate the versatile function of motion mode (M-mode) into omental infarction diagnosis to describe how the M-mode is useful in the evaluation of fat motion in children suspected of having omental infarction. In 2019 we suggested a new Ultrasound sign named \"tethered fat sign\" for an accurate non-invasive diagnosis of omental infarction in children. This finding was observed in 6 of the 234 seen children of our previous study with 4 laparoscopic confirmed diagnosis.
UNASSIGNED: From January 2019 to July 2021, we evaluated 195 children (91 boys and 104 girls, from 3 to 15 years) admitted to our Santobono-Pausilipon Children Hospital with acute right-sided abdominal pain. Abdominal ultrasound was performed to all the patients and the investigation of \"tethered fat sign\" was always included.
UNASSIGNED: In 7 patients ultrasound showed the presence of a hyperechoic oval mass localized in the right upper abdominal quadrant and in 2 of these M-mode documented a normal subhepatic fat moving during respiratory movements in relation with the abdominal wall. The remaining 5 patients had an omental infarction showed as a subhepatic motionless mass tethered to the abdominal wall on M-mode. In these patients, a sonographic follow-up was performed every 15 d for 2 months showing a progressive reduction in size of the right-sided hyperechoic mass.
UNASSIGNED: In the evaluation of all children who showed the presence of the \"tethered fat sign\" the use of M-mode provide a certified image in diagnostic ultrasound.

Partial infarction of the great omentum is a rare cause of abdominal pain and may present as a surgical emergency. Omental infarction might occur due to its torsion, but cases without obvious cause are reported. Risk factors related to this condition are overweight, obesity, abdominal trauma, recent abdominal surgery, hypercoagulability, postprandial vascular congestion and an increase in intra-abdominal pressure. Because of the condition\'s rarity, most patients are treated with surgery and the diagnosis is established intraoperatively. Preoperative diagnosis allows successful conservative treatment with analgesics and anti-inflammatory drugs. This case reports a young female patient with class III obesity presented with spontaneous partial infarction of the great omentum treated with laparoscopy.

Omental infarction (OI) is a rare condition with an overall incidence of less than 0.3%. It can occur spontaneously or can be secondary to trauma, surgery, and inflammation. While previously a diagnosis of exclusion, due to development in imaging technology, OI can now be identified based on CT findings. OI symptoms can mimic an acute abdomen, prompting potentially unnecessary surgical exploration. Treatment options range from conservative management to interventional radiology or surgical resection of the infarcted omentum. We are presenting the first case of OI following robotic-assisted inguinal hernia repair. This case highlights the importance of considering OI in differential diagnoses for patients presenting with acute abdominal pain, the utility of imaging workup in identifying OI, and guidance for conservative treatment approaches to reduce unnecessary surgical intervention.

Acute abdominal pain is a common presentation in emergency departments, often attributed to a myriad of potential causes. Among these, acute appendicitis remains a frequently diagnosed culprit. However, this case report presents a 32-year-old male who arrived at the emergency department with severe right lower quadrant abdominal pain, characterized by localized tenderness and guarding. The initial clinical diagnosis pointed to acute appendicitis. Before surgical intervention, a computed tomography scan was conducted and revealed a focal area of fat stranding, consistent with omental infarction, while the appendix appeared normal. The patient\'s management involved pain control and supportive care, leading to a complete resolution of abdominal pain at a two-week follow-up. This case emphasizes the significance of including omental infarction in the spectrum of diagnoses for acute abdominal pain, underlining the potential to prevent unnecessary surgical interventions.

BACKGROUND: Omental torsion is due to the twisting of the omentum along its axis and is observed in young male patients. The first description of omental torsion was first made by Eitel in 1899.
METHODS: A 35-year-old male presented with right iliac fossa pain, nausea, occasional vomiting and loss of appetite for four days. His clinical and radiological findings were suggestive of acute appendicitis. However, he was diagnosed with greater omental torsion intraoperatively and successfully managed with laparoscopic omentectomy.
CONCLUSIONS: Omental torsion is a rare condition with a low incidence. Preoperative diagnosis of omental torsion continues to be a challenge as the symptoms reported in the literature are usually confused with other abdominal pathologies such as appendicitis or cholecystitis etc. Preoperative US or CT scans are mandatory, and these procedures can accurately accomplish the pre-operative diagnosis. In search for the treatment of choice, laparoscopy proved its effectiveness as a diagnostic tool since it allows for confirming the diagnosis, evaluating the severity of the ischemia, and ruling out other surgical pathologies and therapeutic tools. At the same time, the open surgery approach can be described in many cases as being too invasive.
CONCLUSIONS: Greater omental torsion should be considered a differential diagnosis in all patients with acute abdominal emergencies.

Omental infarction is a rare cause of acute abdominal pain, and its rarity is mainly due to its relatively rich blood supply by multiple collateral vessels. It usually presents with right lower quadrant pain, as left-sided torsion is infrequent and is usually diagnosed intraoperatively. Since omental infarction is frequently diagnosed by CT scan, conservative management should be considered in most patients to avoid subjecting the patients to unnecessary surgical intervention. We present a rare case of idiopathic omental infarction in which the patient was initially radiologically diagnosed with Meckel\'s diverticulitis but was later found to have omental infarction on diagnostic laparoscopy.