nerve blocks

神经阻滞
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在下腹部手术后的第一天报告了中度至重度的疼痛。没有研究比较腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞与后椎板阻滞(RLB)在腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术中的术后疼痛缓解。
    在这个前景中,随机试验,美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)的42名男性患者的身体状况I和II,18-65岁,BMI<40kg/m2的患者在腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术后接受TAP或RLB。进行了标准的全身麻醉技术。患者被随机分为两组:单次TAP阻滞(I组)(n=21)或RLB(II组)(n=21),双侧20ml0.375%罗哌卡因。术后,静脉给予扑热息痛1g作为抢救镇痛。术后24小时累积视觉模拟评分(VAS)评分被认为是主要结果。
    术后24小时休息时的累积VAS评分,表示为平均值±S.D(95%CI),TAP阻滞组为3.54±3.04(2.16~4.93),RLB组为6.09±4.83(3.89~8.29).TAP阻滞组P值为0.112,运动VAS值为7.95±3.41(6.39~9.50[2.5~15.0]),而RLB组的P值为0.110,运动时的VAS值为10.83±5.51(8.32-13.34)。
    在接受TAP阻滞或RLB的患者中,术后24h运动时的累积疼痛评分相似。然而,术后18小时和24小时接受TAP阻滞的患者在休息和运动时的VAS评分降低。
    UNASSIGNED: Moderate-to-severe intensity pain is reported on the first day following lower abdominal surgery. No study has compared transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block with retrolaminar block (RLB) in laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery for postoperative pain relief.
    UNASSIGNED: In this prospective, randomized trial, 42 male patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I and II, aged 18-65 years, and having a BMI <40 kg/m2 received TAP or RLB following laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery. A standard general anesthetic technique was performed. Patients were randomized into two groups: single-shot TAP block (group I) (n = 21) or the RLB (group II) (n = 21) with bilateral 20 ml of 0.375% ropivacaine. Postoperatively, IV paracetamol 1 g was administered as rescue analgesia. Postoperative cumulative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score 24 hours after surgery was considered as the primary outcome.
    UNASSIGNED: Postoperative cumulative VAS score at rest at 24 h, represented as mean ± S.D (95% CI), in the TAP block group was 3.54 ± 3.04 (2.16-4.93) and in the RLB group was 6.09 ± 4.83 (3.89-8.29). P value was 0.112 and VAS on movement was 7.95 ± 3.41 (6.39-9.50 [2.5-15.0]) in TAP block group, whereas P value was 0.110 and VAS on movement was 10.83 ± 5.51 (8.32-13.34) in the RLB group.
    UNASSIGNED: Similar postoperative cumulative pain score on movement at 24 h was present in patients receiving TAP block or RLB. However, VAS score at rest and on movement was reduced in patients receiving TAP block at 18 and 24 h postoperatively.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    脊柱和硬膜外阻滞通常用于在剖宫产期间和之后缓解疼痛。鞘内注射吗啡(ITM)多年来一直是相同的黄金标准。最近,许多外周神经阻滞(PNBs)已尝试用于剖宫产(PACD)术后镇痛.本文回顾了用于PACD的常见PNB。研究了PNB与ITM的作用,并探索了PACD的当前最佳策略。目前,已经发现髂腹股沟神经和腹前横肌平面阻滞联合鞘内注射吗啡是最有效的策略。与单独的ITM相比,在6小时提供更低的休息疼痛。在未接受鞘内注射吗啡的患者中,推荐的PNB是腹横肌平面阻滞,单次注射局部麻醉伤口浸润,或使用直肌筋膜下的导管持续浸润伤口。PNB建议用于PACD。它们具有阿片类药物保护作用,并且没有与中枢神经传导阻滞相关的不良反应,如低血压,心动过缓,和尿潴留。然而,由于需要大量的药物,必须谨慎观察PNB可能的局部麻醉毒性。
    Spinal and epidural blocks are commonly employed for pain relief during and following cesarean section. Intrathecal morphine (ITM) has been the gold standard for the same for many years. In recent times, many peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) have been tried for postoperative analgesia following cesarean delivery (PACD). This article has reviewed the common PNBs used for PACD. The role of PNBs along with ITM has been studied and the current best strategy for PACD has also been explored. Currently, Ilio-inguinal nerve and anterior transversus abdominis plane block in conjunction with intrathecal morphine have been found to be the most effective strategy, providing lower rest pain at 6 hours as compared to ITM alone. In patients not receiving intrathecal morphine, recommended PNBs are lateral transversus abdominis plane block, single shot local anesthetic wound infiltration, or continuous wound infiltration with catheter below rectus fascia. PNBs are recommended for PACD. They have an opioid-sparing effect and are devoid of adverse effects associated with central neuraxial blocks such as hypotension, bradycardia, and urine retention. However, caution must be observed with PNBs for possible local anesthetic toxicity due to the large volumes of drug required.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    FDA最近批准Zynrelef®(布比卡因和美洛昔康的缓释粘性溶液)在闭合时使用,并提供72小时的术后镇痛。尽管FDA并未限制神经阻滞与该制剂的联合使用,这种联合用药的安全性和有效性尚待记录.这项质量改进研究在FDA批准的适应症中调查了这种组合。
    选择两家医院的外科医生使用Zynrelef®。根据护理标准,外科医生也被允许在手术前请求单神经阻滞。进行的神经阻滞类型(单侧或双侧)包括腹部手术的腰方肌阻滞和椎旁阻滞,和内收肌管阻滞用于全膝关节置换术。每个模块使用20mL的0.375%布比卡因(n=129)或0.5%的罗哌卡因(n=30)进行。疼痛评分,阿片类药物的消费,并记录出院时的处方补充要求。手术当天出院的患者分为两组-接受单神经阻滞加Zynrelef®的患者(第1组)与仅接受Zynrelef®治疗的患者(第2组)进行非配对t检验分析.
    共有184名患者接受了Zynrelef®治疗,包括25名没有接受阻断的患者,44人接受单边区块,114人接受双边区块。没有观察到提示局部麻醉剂毒性(LAST)的症状。该组合的使用与满足阿片类药物处方的患者数量减少50%相关。
    这项研究提供了证据,证明单个单侧或双侧神经阻滞与Zynrelef®的组合是安全的。
    UNASSIGNED: The FDA recently approved Zynrelef® (A viscous solution of extended release of bupivacaine and meloxicam) to be applied at closure and providing postoperative analgesia for 72 hrs. Although the FDA didn\'t restrict the use of nerve blocks in combination with this formulation, the safety and efficacy of such a combination has yet to be documented. This quality improvement study investigated this combination within the FDA-approved indications.
    UNASSIGNED: Selected surgeons at two hospitals were chosen to use Zynrelef®. According to the standard of care, surgeons were also allowed to request single nerve blocks before surgery. The type of nerve blocks (unilateral or bilateral) performed included quadratus lumborum and paravertebral blocks for abdominal surgery, and adductor canal block for total knee replacement. Each block was performed with 20 mL of 0.375% bupivacaine (n=129) or 0.5% of ropivacaine (n=30). Pain scores, opioid consumption, and prescription refill requests at discharge were recorded. Patients discharged on the same day of surgery were separated into two groups-those who received single nerve blocks plus an Zynrelef® (group 1) vs. those receiving Zynrelef® only (group 2) and was analyzed using an un-paired t-test.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 184 patients received Zynrelef®, including 25 patients who didn\'t receive blocks, 44 who received unilateral blocks and 114 who received bilateral blocks. No symptoms suggestive of Local Anesthetic Toxicity (LAST) were observed. The use of the combination was associated with a 50% reduction in the number of patients filling their opioid prescription.
    UNASSIGNED: This study provides evidence that the combination of a single unilateral or bilateral nerve block with Zynrelef® is safe.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    阿片类药物相关的死亡是美国意外死亡的主要原因。阑尾炎是儿童和青少年腹痛的常见原因。在儿科人群中,整个腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)的疼痛管理是一个至关重要的问题。本研究旨在评估LA术后镇痛药使用趋势和患者满意度,重点是减少疼痛管理对阿片类药物的依赖。从2003年到2023年,对18258篇文章进行了过滤,用于与LA一起使用的所有类型的镇痛药。使用系统审查和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目筛选出版物。纳入19项研究进行分析和综述.该研究包括同行评审的实验和观察性研究,涉及18岁以下的个人。疼痛管理策略因研究而异,涉及镇痛药的组合,神经阻滞,和伤口浸润。镇痛药,如对乙酰氨基酚,非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs),和阿片类药物在手术前后给药。一些研究实施了患者自控镇痛(PCA)泵。其他研究探索了非药物干预措施,如磁针。结果显示,接受LA治疗的患者术后镇痛药的需求减少,特别是当使用非阿片类药物和新型镇痛技术时。接受加巴喷丁的儿科患者报告阿片类药物使用率较低,缩短住院时间,满意度高。然而,在某些情况下,对阿片类药物的依赖仍然很大,特别是腹膜炎患者需要更多的吗啡。儿科患者的疼痛管理是多方面的,包括术前和术后镇痛药,神经阻滞,PCA泵。在持续的阿片类药物流行的背景下,努力改善小儿LA后的疼痛管理,同时减少阿片类药物依赖是必不可少的。这项研究的发现强调了非阿片类镇痛药的潜在益处,神经阻滞,以及管理<18例阑尾切除术患者术后疼痛的替代方法。需要对疼痛管理方案进行进一步的研究和标准化,以确保最佳的患者预后并将阿片类药物相关并发症的风险降至最低。
    Opioid-related fatalities are a leading cause of accidental death in the United States. Appendicitis is a common cause of abdominal pain in children and adolescents. The management of pain throughout the laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) in the pediatric population is a critical concern. This study aimed to evaluate trends in analgesic use and patient satisfaction following LA, with a focus on reducing the reliance on opioids for pain management. From 2003 to 2023, 18258 articles were filtered for all types of analgesic use with LA. The publications were screened using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, and 19 studies were included for analysis and review. The study included peer-reviewed experimental and observational studies involving individuals under 18 years. Pain management strategies varied across studies, involving a combination of analgesics, nerve blocks, and wound infiltrations. Analgesics such as acetaminophen, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and opioids were administered before and after surgery. Some studies implemented patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pumps. Other studies explored non-pharmacological interventions like magnetic acupuncture. The results showed a reduction in the need for postoperative analgesics in patients treated with LA, particularly when using non-opioid medications and novel analgesic techniques. Pediatric patients who received gabapentin reported lower opioid use, shorter hospital stays, and high satisfaction rates. However, the reliance on opioids remained significant in some cases, particularly among patients with peritonitis who required more morphine. Pain management in pediatric patients is multifaceted, involving preoperative and postoperative analgesics, nerve blocks, and PCA pumps. Efforts to improve pain management following pediatric LA while reducing opioid reliance are essential in the context of the ongoing opioid epidemic. The findings from this study highlight the potential benefits of non-opioid analgesics, nerve blocks, and alternative methods for managing postoperative pain in <18 appendectomy patients. Further research and standardization of pain management protocols are needed to ensure optimal patient outcomes and minimize the risk of opioid-related complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    股神经阻滞是一种广泛使用的镇痛技术,用于股骨近端骨折手术的脊柱麻醉前定位。包膜神经群(PENG)阻滞是一种具有运动特性的较新技术。我们比较了这些块对患者脊柱麻醉的镇痛效果。
    在这项研究中,60例患者被随机分为PENG组(n=30)或股骨组(n=30)。执行块后,每10分钟使用视觉模拟评分(VAS)评分评估疼痛30分钟.主要目标是30分钟时疼痛的中位数[四分位距(IQR)]减少(动态VAS,15度被动肢体抬高)。次要目标是脊柱位置评分(EOSP),在定位过程中获得的角度,术后镇痛持续时间和股四头肌无力。
    两组的人口统计学具有可比性。30分钟后,PENG组和股骨组的中位VAS(IQR)为6(5-7),股骨组为5(5-6)(P=0.004).次要结果如患者获得的EOSP评分和角度具有可比性。在术后期间,PENG组患者的疼痛明显低于股骨组.PENG阻滞可延长镇痛时间。PENG阻滞后股四头肌无力显著降低(P<0.001)。
    PENG阻滞在股骨近端骨折手术的脊柱麻醉前提供比股骨阻滞更好的镇痛效果。术后镇痛时间也更长。
    UNASSIGNED: Femoral nerve block is a widely used analgesia technique for positioning before spinal anaesthesia for proximal femur fracture surgeries. Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block is a newer technique with motor-sparing characteristics. We compared the analgesic efficacy of these blocks for patient positioning for spinal anaesthesia.
    UNASSIGNED: In this study, 60 patients were randomised to either the PENG group (n = 30) or the femoral group (n = 30). After performing the block, the pain was assessed every 10 min using a visual analogue scale (VAS) score for 30 min. The primary objective was the median [interquartile range (IQR)] reduction in pain (dynamic VAS with 15-degree passive limb elevation) at 30 min. Secondary objectives were ease of spinal position score (EOSP), angle obtained during positioning, duration of postoperative analgesia and quadriceps weakness.
    UNASSIGNED: The demographics were comparable in both groups. After 30 min, the median (IQR) VAS was 6 (5-7) in the PENG group and 5 (5-6) in the femoral group (P = 0.004). Secondary outcomes such as EOSP score and angle obtained by patients were comparable. In the postoperative period, patients had significantly lower pain in the PENG group compared to the femoral group. The duration of analgesia was prolonged with PENG block. Quadriceps weakness was significantly low with PENG block (P < 0.001).
    UNASSIGNED: PENG block provides better analgesia than a femoral block before spinal anaesthesia for proximal femur fracture surgery. The postoperative duration of analgesia was also longer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    腹后横肌平面(TAP)阻滞和横肌筋膜平面(TFP)阻滞已用于剖宫产术后镇痛。我们比较了TAP与TFP平面阻滞在选择性剖腹产患者中的镇痛效果。
    我们随机抽取了90名在脊髓麻醉下接受剖腹产的妇女,接受后TAP(TAP组)。术后TFP(组TFP)或无阻滞(组C)。主要目标是术后镇痛需求。次要目标是镇痛持续时间,疼痛评分和脐下感觉丧失,以特定间隔记录24小时。使用社会科学统计软件包16.0版软件进行统计分析。
    患者需要一个,干预措施和对照组之间的2种或0种抢救镇痛药具有可比性(P=0.32).与C组相比,TAP组的镇痛持续时间更长,4.76(1.2)vs.6.89(2.4);P<0.001,而组TFP,5.64(2.1)h,与C组没有显着差异。4h及12h后TAP组的静态疼痛评分明显低于C组(P<0.001),而TFP组在所有时间点均与C组相当,除了4h和24h(P=0.002)。只有TAP组表现出中线脐下感觉丧失。
    与对照组相比,TAP和TFP阻断并未降低抢救镇痛需求。后TAP阻滞延长了2小时的镇痛时间,将中位静态疼痛评分维持在0超过12小时,并在脐下皮节表现出感觉丧失。
    UNASSIGNED: Posterior-transversus abdominus plane (TAP) block and transversalis fascia plane (TFP) block have been used for postoperative analgesia following caesarean delivery. We compared the analgesic efficacy of the TAP vs TFP plane blocks in patients undergoing elective caesarean delivery.
    UNASSIGNED: We randomised 90 women undergoing caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia to receive either a posterior-TAP (Group-TAP), TFP (Group-TFP) or no block (Group-C) postoperatively. The primary objective was the postoperative analgesic requirements. Secondary objectives were duration of analgesia, pain scores and infra-umbilical sensory loss, which were recorded at specific intervals for 24 h. Statistical analysis was carried out using Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 16.0 software.
    UNASSIGNED: The patients requiring one, two or nil rescue analgesics were comparable between the interventions and the control (P = 0.32). The duration of analgesia was longer in Group-TAP when compared to Group-C, 4.76 (1.2) vs. 6.89 (2.4); P < 0.001, whereas Group-TFP, 5.64 (2.1) h, was not significantly different from Group-C. The static pain score in Group-TAP was significantly less than that in Group-C at 4 h and beyond 12 h (P < 0.001), whereas Group-TFP was comparable with Group-C at all time points except at 4 h and 24 h (P = 0.002). Only Group-TAP demonstrated midline infraumbilical sensory loss.
    UNASSIGNED: TAP and TFP blocks did not decrease the rescue analgesic requirement compared with the control group. The posterior-TAP block prolonged the duration of analgesia by 2 h, maintained the median static pain score at 0 beyond 12 h, and demonstrated sensory loss at the infraumbilical dermatomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:胸骨旁肋间阻滞(PSB)已被提议用于正中胸骨切开术患者的术后镇痛。PSB可以使用两种不同的方法来实现,分别为浅表胸骨旁肋间平面阻滞(SPIP)和深胸骨旁肋间平面阻滞(DPIP)。
    方法:我们设计了当前的前瞻性,观察性队列研究,比较两种方法的镇痛效果。选择2022年1月至9月接受全胸骨切开术的心脏外科手术患者,分为三组,根据疼痛控制策略:吗啡,SPIP,和DPIP组。主要结果是术后疼痛评估为12h的NRS绝对值。次要结果是24和48h的NRS,需要挽救镇痛(阿片类药物和NSAIDs),术后恶心和呕吐的发生率,拔管时间,机械通气持续时间,和肠功能障碍。
    结果:共纳入96人。研究组之间在24小时和48小时的中值数字疼痛评定量表方面没有显着差异。术后吗啡总消耗量为1.00(0.00-3.00),2.00(0.00-5.50),和15.60毫克(9.60-30.00)在SPIP,DPIP,还有吗啡组,分别(SPIP和DPIP与吗啡:p<0.001)。与吗啡组相比,SPIP和DPIP组的甲氧氯普胺消耗量较低(p=0.01)。研究组之间的机械通气持续时间和肠道活动没有差异。DPIP组发生两次气胸。
    结论:SPIP和DPIP似乎都能够通过全正中胸骨切开术保证心脏手术后阶段的有效疼痛管理,同时确保减少阿片类药物和止吐药物的消耗。
    BACKGROUND: Parasternal intercostal blocks (PSB) have been proposed for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing median sternotomy. PSB can be achieved using two different approaches, the superficial parasternal intercostal plane block (SPIP) and deep parasternal intercostal plane block (DPIP) respectively.
    METHODS: We designed the present prospective, observational cohort study to compare the analgesic efficacy of the two approaches. Cardiac surgical patients who underwent full sternotomy from January to September 2022 were enrolled and divided into three groups, according to pain control strategy: morphine, SPIP, and DPIP group. Primary outcomes were was postoperative pain evaluated as absolute value of NRS at 12 h. Secondary outcomes were the NRS at 24 and 48 h, the need for salvage analgesia (both opioids and NSAIDs), incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, time to extubation, mechanical ventilation duration, and bowel disfunction.
    RESULTS: Ninety-six were enrolled. There was no significant difference in terms of median Numeric Pain Rating Scale at 24 h and at 48 h between the study groups. Total postoperative morphine consumption was 1.00 (0.00-3.00), 2.00 (0.00-5.50), and 15.60 mg (9.60-30.00) in the SPIP, DPIP, and morphine group, respectively (SPIP and DPIP vs morphine: p < 0.001). Metoclopramide consumption was lower in SPIP and DPIP group compared with morphine group (p = 0.01). There was no difference in terms of duration of mechanical ventilation and of bowel activity between the study groups. Two pneumothorax occurred in the DPIP group.
    CONCLUSIONS: Both SPIP and DPIP seem able to guarantee an effective pain management in the postoperative phase of cardiac surgeries via full median sternotomy while ensuring a reduced consumption of opioids and antiemetic drugs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:膝关节疾病多见于中老年人群,所以人工膝关节置换术在中老年人身上也使用得比较多。虽然通过手术可以减轻病人的疼痛,常伴有手术和中和后的中度疼痛,这不仅增加了患者的心理负担,而且大大降低了术后恢复效果,严重时还可能导致术后不良事件的发生。
    目的:探讨人工智能(AI)和超声引导下神经阻滞在全膝关节置换术(TKA)中的镇痛效果。
    方法:选择2021年1月至2022年1月我院收治的92例TKA患者,根据治疗方案分为两组。对照组采用腰-硬联合麻醉。研究组采用AI技术联合超声引导下神经阻滞麻醉。感觉阻滞时间,电机阻塞时间,对比两组患者不同时间点的视觉模拟评分(VAS)及并发症发生情况。
    结果:研究组感觉阻滞起效时间和感觉阻滞完善时间均短于对照组,结果无显著性差异(P>0.05)。研究组感觉阻滞时间明显长于对照组(P<0.05)。研究组的运动阻滞发作时间和运动阻滞完善时间均短于对照组,结果无显著性差异(P>0.05)。研究组运动阻滞持续时间明显长于对照组。研究组不同时间点的VAS评分均显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。研究组术后不同时间点的髋关节屈曲和外展活动度均显著优于对照组(P<0.05)。研究组并发症发生率明显低于对照组(P=0.049)。
    结论:在TKA中,人工智能技术与超声引导神经阻滞的结合效果显着,术后并发症少,镇痛效果显著,这是值得应用的。
    BACKGROUND: Knee diseases are more common in middle-aged and elderly people, so artificial knee replacement is also more used in middle-aged and elderly people. Although the patient\'s pain can be reduced through surgery, often accompanied by moderate pain after surgery and neutralization, which not only increases the psychological burden of the patient, but also greatly reduces the postoperative recovery effect, and may also lead to the occurrence of postoperative adverse events in severe cases.
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the analgesic effect of artificial intelligence (AI) and ultrasound-guided nerve block in total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
    METHODS: A total of 92 patients with TKA admitted to our hospital from January 2021 to January 2022 were opted and divided into two groups according to the treatment regimen. The control group received combined spinal-epidural anesthesia. The research group received AI technique combined with ultrasound-guided nerve block anesthesia. The sensory block time, motor block time, visual analogue scale (VAS) at different time points and complications were contrasted between the two groups.
    RESULTS: The time of sensory block onset and sensory block perfection in the research group was shorter than those in the control group, but the results had no significant difference (P > 0.05). Duration of sensory block in the research group was significantly longer than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The time of motor block onset and motor block perfection in the research group was shorter than those in the control group, but the results had no significant difference (P > 0.05). Duration of motor block in the research group was significantly longer than those in the control group. The VAS scales of the research group were significantly lower than that of the control group at different time points (P < 0.05). The postoperative hip flexion and abduction range of motion in the research group were significantly better than those in the control group at different time points (P < 0.05). The incidence of complications was significantly lower in the research group than in the control group (P = 0.049).
    CONCLUSIONS: In TKA, the combination of AI technology and ultrasound-guided nerve block has a significantly effect, with fewer postoperative complications and significantly analgesic effect, which is worthy of application.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景和目的超声引导下的股骨和pop坐骨神经阻滞是许多膝下手术的有用辅助手段,如清创术,截肢,等。该研究的目的是在急诊医学部(ED)中发现超声引导的股骨和pop联合坐骨神经阻滞用于膝关节以下手术的有效性和可行性。方法这项前瞻性临床研究在ED进行了三个月。共有30名接受膝下手术的患者被纳入研究。由接受过超声训练的急诊医师使用高频线性超声探头对每位患者进行股和pop坐骨神经阻滞。块的效果,使用的局部麻醉剂(LA)的量,程序的持续时间,并记录阻滞后镇痛。监测患者可能的并发症,如果有的话。使用MicrosoftExcel工作表输入和分析数据。结果对于两种块的组合,所需的LA的平均体积为约34.5cc。研究期间未报告血管穿刺或神经损伤等并发症。完成该程序所需的时间约为33分钟,完成手术后,达到感觉阻滞的平均时间约为9分钟。结论超声引导下的股—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
    Background and objectives Ultrasound-guided femoral and popliteal sciatic nerve blocks are useful adjuncts for many below-knee procedures like debridement, amputation, etc. The objectives of the study were to find the efficacy and feasibility of the ultrasound-guided combined femoral and popliteal sciatic nerve block for below-knee procedures in the Emergency Medicine Department (ED). Methodology This prospective clinical study was carried out over three months in ED. A total of 30 patients undergoing below-knee procedures were included in the study. Femoral and popliteal sciatic nerve blocks were administered to each patient using the high-frequency linear ultrasound probe by emergency physicians trained in ultrasound. The effect of blocks, amount of local anesthetic (LA) used, duration of the procedure, and post-block analgesia were recorded. Patients were monitored for possible complications, if any. Data were entered and analyzed using a Microsoft Excel worksheet. Results The average volume of LAs required was around 34.5 cc for both blocks combined. No complications like vascular puncture or nerve injury were reported during the study. The time taken to complete the procedure was around 33 minutes, and the average time to achieve sensory block was around 9 minutes after completing the procedure. Conclusions An ultrasound-guided combined femoral and popliteal sciatic nerve block is an effective and feasible procedure and thus should be considered in ED for below-knee procedures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:腰四体阻滞是一种相对较新的躯干阻滞,并且已经描述了该阻滞的不同方法。随着最近对前方肌阻滞(QLB3)的肋下方法的修改,注射点在头颅和中间进一步移动,从而旨在增强局部麻醉剂向胸椎旁间隙的扩散。尽管这种修改所达到的阻断水平似乎足以用于开放性肾切除术,修改仍有待临床评估。在这项回顾性研究中,我们旨在评估改良肋下QLB3入路对术后镇痛的影响.
    方法:对2021年1月至2022年1月在开放性肾切除术后接受改良肋下QLB3术后镇痛的所有成年患者进行回顾性评估。因此,评估术后前24h内休息/活动期间的阿片类药物总消耗量和疼痛评分.
    结果:共14例患者行开放性肾切除术。术后前6小时疼痛评分,特别是动态数字评定量表(NRS)分数(4-6.5/10),很高。前24小时的中位(四分位距)静息和动态NRS评分分别为2.75(1.79)和3.91(1.67),分别。前24小时的平均±标准偏差IV-吗啡等效剂量为30.9±10.9mg。
    结论:发现改良的肋下QLB3在术后早期不能提供令人满意的镇痛效果。需要进一步的随机研究来广泛调查术后镇痛效果,以得出更有力的结论。
    BACKGROUND: Quadratus lumborum block is a relatively new truncal block and different approaches to this block have been described. With a recent modification to the subcostal approach to the anterior quadratus lumborum block (QLB3), the injection point was moved further cranially and medially, thereby aiming to enhance the spread of the local anesthetic into the thoracic paravertebral space. Although the level of blockade achieved with this modification seems sufficient for open nephrectomy, the modification is still for clinical evaluation. In this retrospective study, we aimed to evaluate the effects of the modified subcostal QLB3 approach on postoperative analgesia.
    METHODS: All adult patients who received a modified subcostal QLB3 for postoperative analgesia following open nephrectomy between January 2021- 2022 were retrospectively evaluated. Accordingly, total opioid consumption and pain scores during rest/activity within the first 24 h after surgery were evaluated.
    RESULTS: A total of 14 patients underwent open nephrectomy were analyzed. Pain scores within the first 6 h postoperatively, particularly the dynamic numeric rating scale (NRS) scores (4-6.5/10), were high. The median (interquartile range) resting and dynamic NRS scores for the first 24 h were 2.75 (1.79) and 3.91 (1.67), respectively. The mean ± standard deviation IV-morphine equivalent dose for the first 24 h was 30.9 ± 10.9 mg.
    CONCLUSIONS: It was found that the modified subcostal QLB3 did not provide satisfactory analgesia in the early postoperative period. Further randomized studies that extensively investigate the postoperative analgesic efficacy are required to draw a stronger conclusion.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号