UNASSIGNED: The aim of this retrospective analysis was to determine if the response to preoperative radio(chemo)therapy is predictive for survival among patients with locally advanced rectal cancer and may act as a potential surrogate endpoint for disease free survival and overall survival.
UNASSIGNED: Eight hundred seventy-eight patients from five centers were analyzed. There were 304 women and 574 men; the median age was 64.7 years. 77.6% and 22.4% of patients received neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy or short-course radiotherapy, resulting in a pathological complete response in 7.3%. T-downstaging and N-downstaging occurred in 50.5% and 37% of patients after neoadjuvant therapy. In patients with T-downstaging, the 10-year DFS and 10-year OS were 64.8% and 66.8% compared to 37.1% and 45.9% in patients without T-downstaging. N-downstaging resulted in 10-year DFS and 10-year OS in 56.2% and 62.5% compared to 47.3% and 52.3% without N-downstaging. Based on routinely evaluated clinical parameters, an absolute risk prediction calculator was generated for 5-year disease-free survival, and 5-year overall survival.
UNASSIGNED: T-downstaging and N-downstaging after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy or short-course radiotherapy resulted in better DFS and OS compared to patients without response. Based on clinical parameters, 5-year DFS, and 5-year OS can be predicted using a prediction calculator.

Diagnosis and therapy of esophageal carcinoma is challenging and requires a multidisciplinary approach. The purpose of the updated German guideline \"Diagnosis and Treatment of Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus-version 3.1\" is to provide practical and evidence-based advice for the management of patients with esophageal cancer. Recommendations were developed by a multidisciplinary expert panel based on an extensive and systematic evaluation of the published medical literature and the application of well-established methodologies (e.g. Oxford evidence grading scheme, grading of recommendations). Accurate diagnostic evaluation of the primary tumor as well as lymph node and distant metastases is required in order to guide patients to a stage-appropriate therapy after the initial diagnosis of esophageal cancer. In high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia or mucosal carcinoma endoscopic resection shall be performed. Whether endoscopic resection is the definitive therapeutic measure depends on the histopathological evaluation of the resection specimen. Esophagectomy should be performed minimally invasive or in combination with open procedures (hybrid technique). Because the prognosis in locally advanced esophageal carcinoma is poor with surgery alone, multimodality therapy is recommended. In locally advanced adenocarcinomas of the esophagus or esophagogastric junction, perioperative chemotherapy or preoperative radiochemotherapy should be administered. In locally advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the esophagus, preoperative radiochemotherapy followed by complete resection or definitive radiochemotherapy without surgery should be performed. In the case of residual tumor in the resection specimen after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and R0 resection of squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma, adjuvant immunotherapy with nivolumab should be given. Systemic palliative treatment options (chemotherapy, chemotherapy plus immunotherapy, immunotherapy alone) in unresectable or metastastic esophageal cancer depend on histology and are stratified according to PD-L1 and/or Her2 expression.

The management of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) suffered changes thanks to the development of improved surgical procedures, radiation delivery, and chemotherapy. Although treatment options improved individually, the optimal order is still debated. Neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) has been the \"golden standard\" for locally advanced rectal cancer. There is no common ground in international guidelines on the indications of adjuvant chemotherapy (ADJCHT), with differences between the American, European, and Japanese guidelines. This paper studies the preferences of Romanian oncologists in prescribing ADJCHT. We conducted a single-institution, retrospective study of all nonmetastatic, ECOG 0-1 LARC patients staged II-III who underwent TME and were admitted to the Oncology or Radiotherapy Department of Colțea Clinical Hospital, Bucharest between January 2017 and March 2021. A total of 186 patients were included in the study. A positive correlation was found between ADJCHT and each of the following: (y)pT > 2, (y)pN > 0, and the presence of perineural invasion (PNI+). A strong positive correlation was found between ADJCHT and the presence of at least one risk factor: (y)pT > 2, (y)pN > 0, PNI+, lymphovascular invasion, positive margins, or tumor grade > 1. Tumor downstaging decreased the risk of metastases in the first 2 years and was associated with the use of neoadjuvant radiotherapy, while adding neoadjuvant chemotherapy increased the chance of nodal downstaging. ADJCHT practice for LARC in Romania follows either NCCN or ESMO guidelines, at the discretion of the oncologist, due to the lack of national guideline.

BACKGROUND: The question of the ideal neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma has not been answered to date. Multimodal treatment has become a standard treatment for these adenocarcinomas. Currently, perioperative chemotherapy (FLOT) or neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CROSS) is recommended.
METHODS: A monocentric retrospective analysis compared long-term survival after CROSS versus FLOT. The study enrolled patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus (EAC) or the esophagogastric junction type I or II undergoing oncologic Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy between January 2012 and December 2019. The primary objective was to determine the long-term outcome in terms of overall survival. The secondary objectives were to determine differences regarding the histopathologic categories after neoadjuvant treatment and the histomorphologic regression.
RESULTS: The findings showed no survival advantage for one or the other treatment in this highly standardized cohort. All the patients underwent open (CROSS: 9.4% vs. FLOT: 22%), hybrid (CROSS: 82% vs. FLOT: 72%), or minimally invasive (CROSS: 8.9% vs. FLOT: 5.6%) thoracoabdominal esophagectomy. The median post-surgical follow-up period was 57.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 23.2-109.7 months), and the median survival was longer for the CROSS patients (54 months) than for the FLOT patients (37.2 months) (p = 0.053). The overall 5-years survival was 47% for the entire cohort (48% for the CROSS and 43% for the FLOT patients). The CROSS patients showed a better pathologic response and fewer advanced tumor stages.
CONCLUSIONS: The improved pathologic response after CROSS cannot be translated into longer overall survival. To date, the choice of which neoadjuvant treatment to use can be made only on the basis of clinical parameters and the patient\'s performance status.

To assess oncological outcomes of patients receiving neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (RCT) for soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the extremities.
Patients who were treated with preoperative radiotherapy and concomitant chemotherapy-3 cycles of mitomycin/doxorubicin/cisplatin (MAP) or 2-4 cycles of doxorubicin/cisplatin (AP)-followed by surgery were analyzed retrospectively. Survival rates were estimated, and prognostic factors were identified.
Between 1994 and 2017, a total of 108 patients were included. Median ages were 43 years and 51 years for patients receiving MAP and AP, respectively. The 5‑year local relapse-free survival (LRFS), disease-free survival (DFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS) were 94.1, 63.6, 75.3, and 71.9%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, significant predictors were identified as follows: de novo or R1/R2 resected tumor on admission before RCT (p = 0.017; hazard ratio [HR] 0.112, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.019-0.675) and R0 resection after RCT (p = 0.010; HR 0.121, 95% CI 0.024-0.598) for LRFS; female gender (p = 0.042; HR 0.569, 95% CI 0.330-0.979) and liposarcoma histology (p = 0.014; HR 0.436, 95% CI 0.224-0.845) for DFS; liposarcoma histology (p = 0.003; HR 0.114, 95% CI 0.027-0.478) and AP regimen (p = 0.017; HR 0.371, 95% CI 0.165-0.836) for DSS; age ≤ 45 years (p = 0.043; HR 0.537, 95% CI 0.294-0.980) and liposarcoma histology (p = 0.006; HR 0.318, 95% CI 0.141-0.716) for OS, respectively.
An increased risk for local failure seems to exist for patients with relapsed tumor on admission and having positive surgical margins after neoadjuvant RCT. Intensity of chemotherapy influenced DSS but not OS, which could be due to younger patients receiving MAP.

Administering preoperative radiochemotherapy (RCT) in stage II-III tumors to locally advanced rectal carcinoma patients has proved to be effective in a high percentage of cases. Despite this, 20-30% of patients show no response or even disease progression. At present, preoperative response is assessed by a combination of imaging and tumor regression on histopathology, but recent studies suggest that various genetic abnormalities may be associated with the sensitivity or resistance of rectal cancer tumor cells to neoadjuvant therapy. In the present study we investigated the relationship between genetic lesions detected by high-density single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) arrays 6.0 and response to neoadjuvant RCT, evaluated according to Dworak criteria in 39 rectal cancer tumors before treatment. The highest frequency of copy-number (CN) losses detected corresponded to chromosomes 18q (n = 27; 69%), 1p (n = 22; 56%), 15q (n = 19; 49%), 8p (n = 18; 48%), 4q (n = 17; 46%), and 22q (n = 17; 46%); in turn, CN gains more frequently involved chromosomes 20p (n = 22; 56%), 8p (n = 20; 51%), and 15q (n = 16; 41%). There was a significant association between alterations in the 1p, 3q, 7q, 12p, 17q, 20p, and 22q chromosomal regions and the degree of response to therapy prior to surgery. However, 4q, 15q11.1, and 15q14 chromosomal region alterations were identified as important by five prediction algorithms, i.e., those with the greatest influence on predicting the tumor response to treatment with preoperative RCT. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors showed that gains on 15q11.1 and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels serum at diagnosis were the only independent variables predicting disease-free survival (DFS). Lymph node involvement also showed a prognostic impact on overall survival (OS) in the multivariate analysis. A deep-learning-based algorithm showed a 100% success rate in predicting both DFS and OS at 60 months after diagnosis of the disease. In summary, our results indicate the existence of an association between tumor genetic abnormalities at diagnosis, response to neoadjuvant therapy, and survival of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. In addition to the clinical and biological characteristics of locally advanced rectal cancer patients, these could be used in the future as therapeutic and prognostic biomarkers, to identify patients sensitive or resistant to preoperative treatment, helping guide therapeutic decision-making. Additional prospective studies in larger series of patients are required to confirm the clinical utility of the newly identified biomarkers.

Despite excellent loco-regional control by multimodal treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer, a substantial portion of patients succumb to this disease. As many treatment effects are mediated via reactive oxygen species (ROS), we evaluated the effect of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in ROS-related genes on clinical outcome. Based on the literature, eight SNPs in seven ROS-related genes were assayed. Eligible patients (n = 287) diagnosed with UICC stage II/III rectal cancer were treated multimodally starting with neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (N-RCT) according to the clinical trial protocols of CAO/ARO/AIO-94, CAO/ARO/AIO-04, TransValid-A, and TransValid-B. The median follow-up was 64.4 months. The Ser326Cys polymorphism in the human OGG1 gene affected clinical outcome, in particular cancer-specific survival (CSS). This effect was comparable in extent to the ypN status, an already established strong prognosticator for patient outcome. Homozygous and heterozygous carriers of the Cys326 variant (n = 105) encountered a significantly worse CSS (p = 0.0004 according to the log-rank test, p = 0.01 upon multiple testing adjustment). Cox regression elicited a hazard ratio for CSS of 3.64 (95% confidence interval 1.70-7.78) for patients harboring the Cys326 allele. In a multivariable analysis, the effect of Cys326 on CSS was preserved. We propose the genetic polymorphism Ser326Cys as a promising biomarker for outcome in rectal cancer.

Distant recurrence, especially liver metastases, occurs in one-third of rectal cancer patients initially treated with curative therapy and is still an unsolved problem. The identification of patients at risk is crucial for enabling individualized treatment.
All patients undergoing curative resection for histologically confirmed rectal cancer after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy between January 2001 and December 2015 were included. Sections were stained for Ki67, CD44, apoptosis and CD133. Patients were categorized based on whether they were found to have (CD44+/Ki67+) or not have (CD44+/Ki67+) still proliferating tumor cells.
218 patients who underwent R0 resection for stage I-III rectal cancer were selected. In 37 (17%) of these patients, CD44+/Ki67+ tumor cells were found. In multivariable Cox regression analysis, patients with CD44+/Ki67+ cells had significantly impaired overall (hazard ratio (HR): 3.84, 95% CI: 1.77-8.31, p = 0.001) and relative survival (HR 3.44, 95% CI: 1.46-8.09). The previous results were confirmed after propensity-score matching. In mediation-analysis, the presence of CD44+/Ki67+ cells was associated with a substantial direct effect on overall (HR 1.92, 95% CI: 1.09-9.28) and relative survival (HR 1.63, 95% CI: 1.31-6.38).
The presence of still proliferating CD44+/Ki67+ tumor cells after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy was associated with impaired oncological long-term outcomes. Characterization of these cells should be performed.

BACKGROUND: Despite obvious advances over the last decades, locally advanced adenocarcinomas of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) still carry a dismal prognosis with overall 5-year survival rates of less than 50% even when using modern optimized treatment protocols such as perioperative chemotherapy based on the FLOT regimen or radiochemotherapy. Therefore the question remains whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy or neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy is eliciting the best results in patients with GEJ cancer. Hence, an adequately powered multicentre trial comparing both therapeutic strategies is clearly warranted.
METHODS: The RACE trial is a an investigator initiated multicenter, prospective, randomized, stratified phase III clinical trial and seeks to investigate the role of preoperative induction chemotherapy (2 cycles of FLOT: 5-FU, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, docetaxel) with subsequent preoperative radiochemotherapy (oxaliplatin weekly, 5-FU plus concurrent fractioned radiotherapy to a dose of 45 Gy) compared to preoperative chemotherapy alone (4 cycles of FLOT), both followed by resection and postoperative completion of chemotherapy (4 cycles of FLOT), in the treatment of locally advanced, potentially resectable adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction. Patients with cT3-4, any N, M0 or cT2 N+, M0 adenocarcinoma of the GEJ are eligible for inclusion. The RACE trial aims to enrol 340 patients to be allocated to both treatment arms in a 1:1 ratio stratified by tumour site. The primary endpoint of the trial is progression-free survival assessed with follow-up of maximum 60 months. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, R0 resection rate, number of harvested lymph nodes, site of tumour relapse, perioperative morbidity and mortality, safety and toxicity and quality of life.
CONCLUSIONS: The RACE trial compares induction chemotherapy with FLOT followed by preoperative oxaliplatin and 5-Fluorouracil-based chemoradiation versus preoperative chemotherapy with FLOT alone, both followed by surgery and postoperative completion of FLOT chemotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced, non-metastatic adenocarcinoma of the GEJ. The trial aims to show superiority of the combined chemotherapy/radiochemotherapy treatment, assessed by progression-free survival, over perioperative chemotherapy alone.
BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov ; NCT04375605 ; Registered 4th May 2020.

BACKGROUND: Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) is a rare but rising tumor entity in the Western world. Treatment is complex, as multimodality is key to optimal results. However, trials solely including AEG are rare, and the question if neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (NRCT) or neoadjuvant/perioperative chemotherapy (NACT) is superior remains unanswered.
METHODS: Patients with AEG I-III treated between October 2010 and August 2019 at the Ordensklinikum Linz or the Kepler University Hospital were identified either from a monitored tumor registry or by chart review. Time-to-event data were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier product limit estimation. The Kruskal-Wallis test and Fisher\'s exact test were used for comparing continuous and categorical data, respectively.
RESULTS: A total of 85 patients (median age 63 years; median Charlson Comorbidity Index 3; 98.8% ECOG PS 0-1) were analyzed. Of these, 52 patients received NRCT (81% CROSS protocol) and 33 NACT (65% EOX and 35% FLOT protocol). There was a significantly higher pathological complete response rate in the NRCT group (30 vs. 12%; p = 0.010); distant relapse rates were higher in the NRCT group and local relapse rates were higher in the NACT group (both not significant). These differences, however, did not translate into a different disease-free survival (20 months; 95% CI: 13-34) or overall survival (44 months; 95% CI: 33-NA). Patients >65 years old had the same advantage from treatment as patients <65 years of age.
CONCLUSIONS: Although treatment of AEG is complex, the progress documented over the last centuries can be reproduced in our real-life setting. Data regarding the superiority of either type of neoadjuvant/perioperative treatment are sparse. We assume no difference between EOX-based NACT and NRCT.