OBJECTIVE: In this publication, we will share our experience of AE management, provide guidance for appropriate staffing, and the discuss the importance of patient education when treating patients with R/R HR neuroblastoma using naxitamab.
BACKGROUND: Approved treatments for patients with refractory and/or relapsed (R/R) high-risk (HR) neuroblastoma are limited, and there is a high unmet need for new treatment combinations. Naxitamab is a disialoganglioside 2 (GD2)-binding antibody that was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration in 2020 for use in combination with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor for the treatment of patients with R/R HR neuroblastoma in the bone and/or bone marrow and who have demonstrated a partial response, minor response, or stable disease with prior therapy.
METHODS: The pediatric oncology team at Atrium Health Levine Children\'s Hospital has successfully treated several patients with naxitamab both alone and in combination with chemotherapy, with no patients requiring unplanned overnight hospitalization and few severe adverse events (AEs). To accomplish this, the team at Levine Children\'s Hospital established standard operating procedures for naxitamab, a therapy defined as high acuity due to the potential for acute AEs with rapid onset and that benefits from continuous monitoring by a nursing team and a dedicated provider.
CONCLUSIONS: This will provide a practical guide for institutions offering naxitamab to their patients, and ensure successful administration of this high acuity treatment in the outpatient setting.

Patients with high-risk neuroblastoma (HR-NB) who are unable to achieve a complete response (CR) to induction therapy have worse outcomes. We investigated the combination of humanized anti-GD2 mAb naxitamab (Hu3F8), irinotecan (I), temozolomide (T), and sargramostim (GM-CSF)-HITS-against primary resistant HR-NB. Eligibility criteria included having a measurable chemo-resistant disease at the end of induction (EOI) treatment. Patients were excluded if they had progressive disease (PD) during induction. Prior anti-GD2 mAb and/or I/T therapy was permitted. Each cycle, administered four weeks apart, comprised Irinotecan 50 mg/m2/day intravenously (IV) plus Temozolomide 150 mg/m2/day orally (days 1-5); naxitamab 2.25 mg/kg/day IV on days 2, 4, 8 and 10, (total 9 mg/kg or 270 mg/m2 per cycle), and GM-CSF 250 mg/m2/day subcutaneously was used (days 6-10). Toxicity was measured using CTCAE v4.0 and responses through the modified International Neuroblastoma Response Criteria (INRC). Thirty-four patients (median age at treatment initiation, 4.9 years) received 164 (median 4; 1-12) HITS cycles. Toxicities included myelosuppression and diarrhea, which was expected with I/T, and pain and hypertension, expected with naxitamab. Grade ≥3-related toxicities occurred in 29 (85%) of the 34 patients; treatment was outpatient. The best responses were CR = 29% (n = 10); PR = 3% (n = 1); SD = 53% (n = 18); PD = 5% (n = 5). For cohort 1 (early treatment), the best responses were CR = 47% (n = 8) and SD = 53% (n = 9). In cohort 2 (late treatment), the best responses were CR = 12% (n = 2); PR = 6% (n = 1); SD = 53% (n = 9); and PD = 29% (n = 5). Cohort 1 had a 3-year OS of 84.8% and EFS 54.4%, which are statistically significant improvements (EFS p = 0.0041 and OS p = 0.0037) compared to cohort 2. In conclusion, naxitamab-based chemo-immunotherapy is effective against primary chemo-resistant HR-NB, increasing long-term outcomes when administered early during the course of treatment.

UNASSIGNED: Anti-disialoganglioside 2 (anti-GD2) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are associated with Grade ≥3 (≥G3) adverse events (AEs) such as severe pain, hypotension, and bronchospasm. We developed a novel method of administering the GD2-binding mAb naxitamab, termed \"Step-Up\" infusion (STU), to reduce the risk of AEs of severe pain, hypotension, and bronchospasm.
UNASSIGNED: Forty-two patients with GD2-positive tumors received naxitamab under \"compassionate use\" protocols and administered via either the standard infusion regimen (SIR) or the STU regimen. The SIR comprises a 60-min infusion of 3 mg/kg/day on Day 1 of cycle 1 and a 30- to 60-min infusion on Day 3 and Day 5, as tolerated. The STU regimen uses a 2-h infusion on Day 1, initiated at a rate of 0.06 mg/kg/h during 15 min (0.015 mg/kg) and which increases gradually to a cumulative dose of 3 mg/kg; on Days 3 and 5, the 3-mg/kg dose is initiated at 0.24 mg/kg/h (0.06 mg/kg) and delivered in 90 min according to the same gradual-increase strategy. AEs were graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0.
UNASSIGNED: The frequency of infusions with an associated G3 AE was reduced from 8.1% (23/284 infusions) with SIR to 2.5% (5/202 infusions) with STU. The odds of an infusion being associated with a G3 AE reduced by 70.3% with STU vs. SIR (odds ratio: 0.297; p = 0.037). Mean serum naxitamab levels pre- and post-STU (11.46 µg/ml pre-infusion; 100.95 µg/ml post-infusion) were within the range reported for SIR.
UNASSIGNED: The comparable pharmacokinetics of naxitamab during SIR and STU may indicate that switching to STU reduces G3 AEs without impact on efficacy.

Naxitamab is an anti-GD2 antibody approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory HR-NB. We report the survival, safety, and relapse pattern of a unique set of HR-NB patients consolidated with naxitamab after having achieved first CR. Eighty-two patients were treated with 5 cycles of GM-CSF for 5 days at 250 μg/m2/day (-4 to 0), followed by GM-CSF for 5 days at 500 μg/m2/day (1-5) and naxitamab at 3 mg/kg/day (1, 3, 5), on an outpatient basis. All patients but one were older than 18 months at diagnosis and had stage M; 21 (25.6%) pts had MYCN-amplified (A) NB; and 12 (14.6%) detectable MRD in the BM. Eleven (13.4%) pts had received high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT and 26 (31.7%) radiotherapy before immunotherapy. With a median follow-up of 37.4 months, 31 (37.8%) pts have relapsed. The pattern of relapse was predominantly (77.4%) an isolated organ. Five-year EFS and OS were 57.9% (71.4% for MYCN A) 95% CI = (47.2, 70.9%); and 78.6% (81% for MYCN A) 95% CI = (68.7%, 89.8%), respectively. EFS showed significant differences for patients having received ASCT (p = 0.037) and pre-immunotherapy MRD (p = 0.0011). Cox models showed only MRD as a predictor of EFS. In conclusion, consolidation with naxitamab resulted in reassuring survival rates for HR-NB patients after end-induction CR.

Naxitamab is a humanized anti-disialoganglioside (GD2) monoclonal antibody approved for treatment of bone/bone marrow refractory high-risk neuroblastoma (HR-NB). Compassionate use (CU) expanded access program at Hospital Sant Joan de Deu permitted treatment of patients in complete remission (CR). We here report the survival, toxicity, and relapse pattern of patients in first or second CR treated with naxitamab and sargramostim (GM-CSF).
Seventy-three consecutive patients with HR-NB (stage M at age >18 months or MYCN-amplified stages L1/L2 at any age) were treated in first or second CR. Treatment comprised five cycles of subcutaneous (SC) GM-CSF for 5 days at 250 μg/m2 /day (days -4 to 0), followed by naxitamab + SC GM-CSF for 5 days at 500 μg/m2 /day (days 1-5). Naxitamab was infused over 30 minutes at 3 mg/kg/day, days 1, 3, and 5, outpatient.
Fifty-five patients were in first CR and 18 in second CR. Seventeen patients had MYCN-amplified NB and 11 detectable minimal residual disease in the bone marrow. Fifty-eight (79.5%) patients completed therapy. Four (5%) experienced grade 4 toxicities and 10 (14%) early relapse. Three-year event-free survival (EFS) 58.4%, 95% CI = (43.5%, 78.4%) and overall survival (OS) 82.4%, 95% CI = (66.8%, 100%). First CR patients 3-year EFS 74.3%, 95% CI = (62.7%, 88.1%), and OS 91.6%, 95% CI = (82.4%, 100%). EFS is significantly different between first and second CR (p = .0029). The pattern of relapse is predominantly (75%) of an isolated organ, mainly bone (54%). Univariate Cox models show prior history of relapse as the only statistically significant predictor of EFS but not OS.
Consolidation with naxitamab and GM-CSF resulted in excellent survival rates for HR-NB patients in CR.

BACKGROUND: Neuroblastic tumors (NBTs) originate from a block in the process of differentiation. Histologically, NBTs are classified in neuroblastoma (NB), ganglioneuroblastoma (GNB), and ganglioneuroma (GN). Current therapy for high-risk (HR) NB includes chemotherapy, surgery, radiotherapy, and anti-GD2 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Anti-GD2 mAbs induce immunological cytoxicity but also direct cell death.
METHODS: We report on patients treated with naxitamab for chemorefractory NB showing lesions with long periods of stable disease. Target lesions with persisting 123I-Metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) uptake after 4 cycles of immunotherapy were further evaluated by functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and/or Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET). MIBG avid lesions that became non-restrictive on MRI (apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) > 1) and/or FDG-PET negative (SUV < 2) were biopsied.
RESULTS: Twenty-seven relapse/refractory (R/R) HR-NB patients were enrolled on protocol Ymabs 201. Two (7.5%) of the 27 showed persistent bone lesions on MIBG, ADC high, and/or FDG-PET negative. Forty-four R/R HR-NB patients received chemo-immunotherapy. Twelve (27%) of the 44 developed persistent MIBG+ but FDG-PET- and/or high ADC lesions. Twelve (86%) of the 14 cases identified were successfully biopsied producing 16 evaluable samples. Histology showed ganglioneuroma maturing subtype in 6 (37.5%); ganglioneuroma mature subtype with no neuroblastic component in 4 (25%); differentiating NB with no Schwannian stroma in 5 (31%); and undifferentiated NB without Schwannian stroma in one (6%). Overall, 10 (62.5%) of the 16 specimens were histopathologically fully mature NBTs.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results disclose an undescribed mechanism of action for naxitamab and highlight the limitations of conventional imaging in the evaluation of anti-GD2 immunotherapy clinical efficacy for HR-NB.