BACKGROUND: Obese children undergoing laparoscopic surgery frequently experience high end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure (PETCO2) and respiratory acidosis. This study aimed to investigate the effects of pressure-controlled inverse ratio ventilation (IRV) with an inspiratory to expiratory ratio (I:E) of 1.5:1 on obese children undergoing laparoscopic surgery.
METHODS: Eighty children undergoing laparoscopic surgery were randomly assigned to either the IRV group (I:E=1.5:1) or the control group (I:E=1:1.5). The lungs were mechanically ventilated following tracheal intubation. The children underwent pressure-controlled ventilation with an I:E ratio of 1.5:1 or 1:1.5. Respiratory mechanics, hemodynamic values, and ventilation-related side effects were recorded.
RESULTS: Thirty minutes after establishing CO2 pneumoperitoneum, the IRV group exhibited significantly higher tidal volume (Vt) and arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) compared to the control group (97.6 ± 6.6 vs. 93.2 ± 8.0 ml, 283 ± 54 vs. 247 ± 40 mmHg, respectively) (P < 0.01). Furthermore, PaCO2 was significantly lower in the IRV group than in the control group (41.4 ± 5.8 vs. 45.5 ± 5.7 mmHg, P=0.002). The incidence of intra-operative hypercapnia was significantly decreased in the IRV group (25% vs. 42.5%, P=0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: Pressure-controlled IRV can reduce the incidence of hypercapnia, increasing Vt, and thereby improving CO2 elimination in obese children undergoing laparoscopy. This ventilation technique significantly improves gas exchange in this patient population. (Registration number: ChiCTR2000035589).

UNASSIGNED: Induction of general anaesthesia is associated with development of atelectasis in the lungs, which may further lead to postoperative pulmonary complications. Inverse ratio ventilation (IRV) has shown to improve oxygenation and minimise further lung injury in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. We evaluated the safety and effectiveness of IRV on intraoperative respiratory mechanics and postoperative pulmonary function tests (PFTs).
UNASSIGNED: In a prospective, controlled study, 128 consecutive patients with normal preoperative PFTs who underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomised into IRV and conventional ventilation groups. Initially, all patients were ventilated with settings of tidal volume 8 mL/kg, respiratory rate 12/min, inspiratory/expiratory ratio (I: E) = 1:2, positive end expiratory pressure = 0. Once the pneumoperitoneum was created, the conventional group patients were continued to be ventilated with same settings. However, in the IRV group, I: E ratio was changed to 2:1. Peak pressure (Ppeak), Plateau pressure (Pplat) and lung compliance were measured. Haemodynamic parameters and arterial blood gas values were also measured. PFTs were repeated in postoperative period. Statistical tool included Chi-square test.
UNASSIGNED: There was no significant difference in PFTs in patients who underwent IRV as compared to conventional ventilation [forced vital capacity (FVC) 2.52 ± 0.13 versus 2.63 ± 0.16, P = 0.28]. The Ppeak (cmH2O) and Pplat (cmH2O) were statistically lower in IRV patients [Ppeak 21.4 ± 3.4 versus 22.4 ± 4.2, P = 0.003] [Pplat 18.7 ± 2.4 versus 19.9.4 ± 3.2, P = 0.008]. There was no significant difference in lung compliance and oxygenation intraoperatively.
UNASSIGNED: Intraoperative IRV led to reduced airway pressures; however, it did not prevent deterioration of PFTs in postoperative period.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of inverse ratio ventilation (IRV) combined with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in infants undergoing thoracoscopic surgery with single lung ventilation (OLV) for lung cystadenomas.
METHODS: A total of 66 infants undergoing thoracoscopic surgery with OLV for lung cystadenomas in our hospital from February, 2018 to February, 2019 were randomized into conventional ventilation groups (group N, n=33) and inverse ventilation group (group R, n=33). Hemodynamics and respiratory parameters of the infants were recorded and arterial blood gas analysis was performed at 15 min after two lung ventilation (TLV) (T1), OLV30 min (T2), OLV60 min (T3), and 15 min after recovery of TLV (T4). Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid was collected before and after surgery to detect the expression level of advanced glycation end product receptor (RAGE).
RESULTS: Sixty-three infants were finally included in this study. At T2 and T3, Cdyn, PaO2 and OI in group R were significantly higher (P < 0.05) and Ppeak, PaCO2 and PA-aO2 were significantly lower than those in group N (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in HR or MAP between the two groups at T2 and T3 (P > 0.05). The level of RAGE significantly increased after the surgery in both groups (P < 0.05), and was significantly lower in R group than in N group (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: In infants undergoing thoracoscopic surgery with OLV for pulmonary cystadenoma, appropriate IRV combined with PEEP does not affect hemodynamic stability and can increases pulmonary compliance, reduce the peak pressure, and improve oxygenation to provide pulmonary protection.

暂无摘要。

OBJECTIVE: Low tidal volume ventilation improves the outcomes of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, no studies have investigated the use of a rescue therapy involving mechanical ventilation when low tidal volume ventilation cannot maintain homeostasis. Inverse ratio ventilation (IRV) is one candidate for such rescue therapy, but the roles and effects of IRV as a rescue therapy remain unknown.
METHODS: We undertook a retrospective review of the medical records of patients with ARDS who received IRV in our hospital from January 2007 to May 2014. Gas exchange, ventilation, and outcome data were collected and analyzed.
RESULTS: Pressure-controlled IRV was used for 13 patients during the study period. Volume-controlled IRV was not used. IRV was initiated on 4.4 ventilation days when gas exchange could not be maintained. IRV significantly improved the PaO2/FiO2 from 76 ± 27 to 208 ± 91 mmHg without circulatory impairment. The mean duration of IRV was 10.5 days, and all survivors were weaned from mechanical ventilation and discharged. The 90-day mortality rate was 38.5 %. Univariate analysis showed that the duration of IRV was associated with the 90-day mortality rate. No patients were diagnosed with pneumothorax.
CONCLUSIONS: Pressure-controlled IRV provided acceptable gas exchange without apparent complications and served as a successful bridge to conventional treatment when used as a rescue therapy for moderate to severe ARDS.

BACKGROUND: It is well documented that pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) improves oxygenation and ventilation compared to volume-controlled ventilation and reduces peak airway pressure in gynecological laparoscopy. PCV with moderately inversed inspiratory-expiratory (I: E) ratio can successfully recruit collapsed alveoli and has been proved to be beneficial in intensive care. We tested the hypothesis that altering the I: E ratio to 1.5:1 in PCV improves ventilation during gynecological laparoscopy using laryngeal mask airway (LMA).
OBJECTIVE: To study pressure-controlled inverse ratio ventilation (PCIRV) with I: E ratio 1.5:1 as against PCV with I: E ratio 1:2 in gynecological laparoscopy with LMA using noninvasive parameters.
METHODS: Intraoperative hemodynamics and side-stream spirometry recordings were noted in 20 consecutive patients undergoing major gynecological laparoscopy with LMA. Flexible LMA or LMA supreme were used depending on normal body mass index (BMI) or high BMI, respectively.
RESULTS: REVERSING THE I: E ratio to 1.5:1 increased the tidal volume, mean airway pressures, and dynamic lung compliance significantly, all indicating better oxygenation at comparable peak airway pressures as against PCV with I: E ratio 1:2. There was no change in the end-tidal carbon dioxide. There was no auto-positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) or change in the hemodynamics.
CONCLUSIONS: REVERSAL OF I: E ratio with PCV can be beneficially used with LMA in laparoscopy.