Background and Objectives: The availability of multiple dental implant systems makes it difficult for the treating dentist to identify and classify the implant in case of inaccessibility or loss of previous records. Artificial intelligence (AI) is reported to have a high success rate in medical image classification and is effectively used in this area. Studies have reported improved implant classification and identification accuracy when AI is used with trained dental professionals. This systematic review aims to analyze various studies discussing the accuracy of AI tools in implant identification and classification. Methods: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed, and the study was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). The focused PICO question for the current study was \"What is the accuracy (outcome) of artificial intelligence tools (Intervention) in detecting and/or classifying the type of dental implant (Participant/population) using X-ray images?\" Web of Science, Scopus, MEDLINE-PubMed, and Cochrane were searched systematically to collect the relevant published literature. The search strings were based on the formulated PICO question. The article search was conducted in January 2024 using the Boolean operators and truncation. The search was limited to articles published in English in the last 15 years (January 2008 to December 2023). The quality of all the selected articles was critically analyzed using the Quality Assessment and Diagnostic Accuracy Tool (QUADAS-2). Results: Twenty-one articles were selected for qualitative analysis based on predetermined selection criteria. Study characteristics were tabulated in a self-designed table. Out of the 21 studies evaluated, 14 were found to be at risk of bias, with high or unclear risk in one or more domains. The remaining seven studies, however, had a low risk of bias. The overall accuracy of AI models in implant detection and identification ranged from a low of 67% to as high as 98.5%. Most included studies reported mean accuracy levels above 90%. Conclusions: The articles in the present review provide considerable evidence to validate that AI tools have high accuracy in identifying and classifying dental implant systems using 2-dimensional X-ray images. These outcomes are vital for clinical diagnosis and treatment planning by trained dental professionals to enhance patient treatment outcomes.

Re-operations and revisions are often performed in patients who have undergone total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). This necessitates an accurate recognition of the implant model and manufacturer to set the correct apparatus and procedure according to the patient\'s anatomy as personalized medicine. Owing to unavailability and ambiguity in the medical data of a patient, expert surgeons identify the implants through a visual comparison of X-ray images. False steps cause heedlessness, morbidity, extra monetary weight, and a waste of time. Despite significant advancements in pattern recognition and deep learning in the medical field, extremely limited research has been conducted on classifying shoulder implants. To overcome these problems, we propose a robust deep learning-based framework comprised of an ensemble of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to classify shoulder implants in X-ray images of different patients. Through our rotational invariant augmentation, the size of the training dataset is increased 36-fold. The modified ResNet and DenseNet are then combined deeply to form a dense residual ensemble-network (DRE-Net). To evaluate DRE-Net, experiments were executed on a 10-fold cross-validation on the openly available shoulder implant X-ray dataset. The experimental results showed that DRE-Net achieved an accuracy, F1-score, precision, and recall of 85.92%, 84.69%, 85.33%, and 84.11%, respectively, which were higher than those of the state-of-the-art methods. Moreover, we confirmed the generalization capability of our network by testing it in an open-world configuration, and the effectiveness of rotational invariant augmentation.

UNASSIGNED: A critical part in preoperative planning for revision arthroplasty surgery involves the identification of the failed implant. Using a predictive artificial neural network (ANN) model, the objectives of this study were: (1) to develop a machine-learning algorithm using operative big data to identify an implant from a radiograph; and (2) to compare algorithms that optimise accuracy in a timely fashion.
UNASSIGNED: Using 2116 postoperative anteroposterior (AP) hip radiographs of total hip arthroplasties from 2002 to 2019, 10 artificial neural networks were modeled and trained to classify the radiograph according to the femoral stem implanted. Stem brand and model was confirmed with 1594 operative reports. Model performance was determined by classification accuracy toward a random 706 AP hip radiographs, and again on a consecutive series of 324 radiographs prospectively collected over 2019.
UNASSIGNED: The Dense-Net 201 architecture outperformed all others with 100.00% accuracy in training data, 95.15% accuracy on validation data, and 91.16% accuracy in the unique prospective series of patients. This outperformed all other models on the validation (p < 0.0001) and novel series (p < 0.0001). The convolutional neural network also displayed the probability (confidence) of the femoral stem classification for any input radiograph. This neural network averaged a runtime of 0.96 (SD 0.02) seconds for an iPhone 6 to calculate from a given radiograph when converted to an application.
UNASSIGNED: Neural networks offer a useful adjunct to the surgeon in preoperative identification of the prior implant.