immune-checkpoint inhibitors

免疫检查点抑制剂
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    Pembrolizumab和其他免疫疗法已成为治疗转移性结肠癌的核心,对错配修复缺陷患者特别有效。我们报告了一例涉及一名男子的病例,他最初于2011年4月27日接受了乙状结肠癌的根治性手术,随后于2017年9月21日进行了肝肿瘤切除术。手术后,患者接受CAPEOX方案辅助化疗8个周期,并通过CT和MRI扫描进行定期监测.2022年8月24日,检测到肝转移,由于MSH2和EPCAM基因的种系突变,他被诊断出患有Lynch综合征(LS)。他于2022年9月2日每三周开始静脉注射200mg派姆单抗治疗,并表现出持续的反应。然而,经过17个周期,他出现了胰腺内分泌功能障碍的治疗相关不良事件(TRAE),导致1型糖尿病,皮下注射胰岛素。经过30个周期的治疗,没有观察到疾病的证据。该病例强调了一线pembrolizumab在治疗与LS相关的结肠癌肝转移中的显着临床益处。尽管发生了TRAE。它提出了关于完全或部分反应后免疫疗法的最佳持续时间以及是否应在TRAE紧急情况下停止治疗的关键问题。持续的研究和即将进行的检查点抑制剂的临床试验有望完善LS相关癌的治疗方案。
    Pembrolizumab and other immunotherapies have become central in treating metastatic colon cancer, particularly effective in patients with mismatch repair deficiencies. We report a case involving a man who initially underwent radical surgery for sigmoid colon cancer on April 27, 2011, followed by hepatic tumor resection on September 21, 2017. Post-surgery, he received eight cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy with the CAPEOX regimen and was regularly monitored through CT and MRI scans. On August 24, 2022, liver metastases were detected, and he was diagnosed with Lynch syndrome (LS) due to germline mutation in the MSH2 and EPCAM genes. He commenced treatment with 200mg of pembrolizumab intravenously every three weeks on September 2, 2022, and demonstrated a sustained response. However, after 17 cycles, he developed a treatment related adverse event (TRAE) of pancreatic endocrine dysfunction, leading to type 1 diabetes, managed with subcutaneous insulin injections. After 30 cycles of treatment, no evidence of disease was observed. This case underscores the significant clinical benefits of first-line pembrolizumab in managing hepatic metastasis in colonic carcinoma associated with LS, despite the occurrence of TRAEs. It raises critical questions regarding the optimal duration of immunotherapy following a complete or partial response and whether treatment should be discontinued upon the emergency of TRAEs. Continued research and forthcoming clinical trials with checkpoint inhibitors are expected to refine treatment protocols for LS-associated carcinoma.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    用免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)治疗可能与广泛的免疫相关不良事件(irAE)有关。在irAE中,免疫介导性肺炎(im-PN)是一种罕见但可能危及生命的副作用.TPrompt多学科诊断和有效管理im-PN对于避免严重并发症并允许恢复治疗至关重要。
    我们收集了一系列皮肤病例(黑色素瘤,皮肤鳞状细胞癌-CSCC),肺,和间皮瘤癌症患者(pts),在锡耶纳大学医院免疫肿瘤学中心接受ICI治疗,意大利,并诊断为IM-PN。彻底收集了临床和放射学数据,以及支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)样本;im-PN使用CTCAEv.5.0进行分级。根据Fleischner学会分类报告了放射学模式。
    从2014年1月到2023年2月,1004名黑色素瘤患者(522),CSCC(42),肺(342)或间皮瘤(98)接受ICI治疗(619单药治疗;385联合治疗)。在接受治疗的患者中,24(2%)发生了im-PN,58%有症状。Im-PN分为G1(10)和G2(14)级。及时的类固醇治疗导致21例患者的im-PN完全缓解,中位时间为14周(范围:0.4-51)。12名患者完全恢复后恢复ICI治疗,2名患者复发,恢复治疗后使用类固醇完全缓解。确定了三种放射学模式:组织性肺炎样(67%),肺嗜酸性粒细胞增多症(29%),和过敏性肺炎(4%)。此外,在8例(33%)患者中进行的BAL分析显示炎性淋巴细胞浸润,主要由泡沫细胞样巨噬细胞浸润6例。值得注意的是,在2例患者中进行的透射电子显微镜评估显示了提示药物介导的毒性的情景.
    Im-PN是ICI治疗的一种罕见但具有挑战性的副作用,起病时间可变,临床和放射学表现不均匀。必须进行多学科评估以优化im-PN的临床管理。
    UNASSIGNED: Treatment with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can be associated with a wide spectrum of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Among irAEs, immune-mediated pneumonitis (im-PN) is a rare but potentially life-threatening side effect. TPrompt multidisciplinary diagnosis and effective management of im-PN may be essential to avoid severe complications and allowing resumation of therapy.
    UNASSIGNED: We collected a case series of skin (melanoma, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma-CSCC), lung, and mesothelioma cancer patients (pts), treated with ICI at the Center for Immuno-Oncology University Hospital of Siena, Italy, and diagnosed with im-PN. Clinical and radiologic data were thoroughly collected, as well as bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples; im-PN was graded using CTCAE v. 5.0. Radiological patterns were reported according to the Fleischner Society classification.
    UNASSIGNED: From January 2014 to February 2023, 1004 patients with melanoma (522), CSCC (42), lung (342) or mesothelioma (98) were treated with ICI (619 monotherapy; 385 combination). Among treated patients, 24 (2%) developed an im-PN and 58% were symptomatic. Im-PN were classified as grades G1 (10) and G2 (14). Prompt steroid treatment led to complete resolution of im-PN in 21 patients, with a median time to resolution of 14 weeks (range: 0.4-51). Twelve patients resumed ICI therapy once fully-recovered and 2 experienced a recurrence that completely resolved with steroids after resumption of treatment. Three radiologic patterns were identified: organizational pneumonia-like (67%), pulmonary eosinophilia (29%), and hypersensitivity pneumonitis (4%). Furthermore, BAL analysis performed in 8 (33%) patients showed an inflammatory lymphocytic infiltrate, predominantly consisting of foam cell-like macrophage infiltrates in 6 cases. Notably, transmission electron microscopy evaluation performed in 2 patients revealed a scenario suggestive of a drug-mediated toxicity.
    UNASSIGNED: Im-PN is a rare but challenging side effect of ICI therapy, with variable time of onset and with heterogeneous clinical and radiological presentations. A multidisciplinary assessment is mandatory to optimize the clinical management of im-PN.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    免疫疗法的出现,特别是使用免疫检查点抑制剂,彻底改变了不同癌症的治疗方法,包括肺癌.免疫检查点抑制剂的使用延长了肺癌的生存期,对相当比例的非小细胞肺癌患者有很大的益处。这里,一个病人的临床病例,尽管PD-L1检测呈阴性,但在晚期转移性非小细胞肺癌中,免疫治疗治疗仍呈现持续完全缓解.此外,综述了有关免疫治疗在这方面的应用的最新发现。
    The advent of immunotherapy, and in particular the use of immune-checkpoint inhibitors, has profoundly revolutionized the treatment of different cancers, including lung cancer. The use of immune-checkpoint inhibitors has prolonged survival in lung cancer with a strong benefit in a significant percentage of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Here, a clinical case of a patient who, despite testing negative for PD-L1, displayed a sustained complete response to immunotherapy treatment in advanced metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer is presented. Additionally, recent findings concerning the application of immunotherapy in this context are reviewed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    抗体-药物缀合物(ADC)代表了治疗几种肿瘤类型的有效药物。包括乳腺癌(BC),具有批准的分子,如曲妥珠单抗-emtansine,曲妥珠单抗-deruxtecan,和sacituzumab-govitecan.免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)在选定的BC亚型中也显示出活性,还有两个探员,派姆单抗和阿特珠单抗,目前已被批准用于治疗三阴性BC患者。BC中ADC和免疫疗法之间的潜在协同作用仍然是活跃研究的领域。临床前研究表明,ADC促进免疫监视,调节肿瘤微环境,诱导免疫原性细胞死亡,增强抗肿瘤免疫力。转化证据表明,单独或与免疫治疗联合使用的ADC的潜在预测性生物标志物,包括靶抗原的表达,致癌途径,肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞,和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞的比率。鉴于这一背景,几项临床试验评估了BC患者的ADC-ICI组合,证明了有希望的结果,具有整体可管理的毒性,目前正在进行许多研究以确认这种治疗方法的有效性和可行性。在本次审查中,我们总结了关于整合ADC和免疫治疗治疗BC的现有证据,强调需要进一步的转化和临床研究来优化这种治疗策略并阐明预测性生物标志物,最终改善患者预后。
    Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) represent an effective class of agents for the treatment of several tumor types, including breast cancer (BC), featuring approved molecules such as trastuzumab-emtansine, trastuzumab-deruxtecan, and sacituzumab-govitecan. Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) also showed activity in selected BC subtypes, and two agents, pembrolizumab and atezolizumab, are currently approved for the treatment of triple-negative BC patients. The potential synergy between ADCs and immunotherapy in BC remains an area of active investigation. Preclinical studies suggest that ADCs promote immune surveillance, modulating tumor microenvironment, inducing immunogenic cell death, and enhancing antitumor immunity. Translational evidence has shown potential predictive biomarkers for ADCs alone or in combination with immunotherapy, including expression of target antigen, oncogenic pathways, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. Given this background, several clinical trials evaluated ADC-ICI combinations in BC patients, demonstrating promising outcomes with an overall manageable toxicity profile, and many studies are currently ongoing to confirm the efficacy and feasibility of this therapeutic approach. In the present review, we summarized the available evidence about the integration of ADCs and immunotherapy for the management of BC, emphasizing the need for further translational and clinical investigations to optimize this treatment strategy and elucidate predictive biomarkers, eventually improving patient outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对转移性肿瘤患者停止免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)而不是进行性疾病(PD)的结果研究甚少。我们对所有报告因PD以外的原因停止ICI的患者的临床结果的研究进行了荟萃分析。
    我们搜索了PubMed,Embase和Scopus数据库,从每个数据库开始到2023年12月,用于临床试验(随机或不随机)和观察性研究,评估PD-(L)1和CTLA-4抑制剂在因PD以外的原因而停止治疗的转移性实体瘤患者中的应用.每个研究都必须提供游泳图或Kaplan-Meier存活曲线,以便在停止免疫疗法后重建无进展生存期(PFS)的个体患者水平数据。主要终点是治疗终止之日起总体PFS,根据肿瘤组织型,治疗类型和停药原因。Combersure方法用于估计荟萃分析非参数总结存活曲线,假设随机效应在研究水平。
    纳入36项研究(2180名患者)。合并的中位PFS(mPFS)为24.7个月(95%CI,18.8-30.6),12、24和36个月的PFS率分别为69.8%(95%CI,63.1-77.3),51.0%(95%CI,43.4-59.8)和34.0%(95%CI,27.0-42.9)。单变量分析显示黑色素瘤患者的mPFS显著延长(43.0个月),与非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC,13.5个月)和肾细胞癌(RCC,10.0个月;阶层间比较测试p值<0.001);对于使用抗PD-(L)1抗CTLA-4治疗的患者,与抗PD-(L)1单药治疗相比(44.6对19.9个月;p值<0.001),在NSCLC中,与毒性发作相比,停药的原因是选择性的(19.6对4.8个月;p值=0.003)。多变量分析证实了这些差异。
    因PD以外的原因停止ICIs的患者的长期结局受到临床病理特征的重大影响:黑色素瘤患者停止治疗后的PFS更长,和/或用抗PD-(L)1+抗CTLA-4治疗,并且在RCC患者或因毒性发作而停止治疗的NSCLC患者中更短。
    意大利大学研究部(PRIN2022Y7HNW)。
    UNASSIGNED: The outcome of patients with metastatic tumors who discontinued immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) not for progressive disease (PD) has been poorly explored. We performed a meta-analysis of all studies reporting the clinical outcome of patients who discontinued ICIs for reasons other than PD.
    UNASSIGNED: We searched PubMed, Embase and Scopus databases, from the inception of each database to December 2023, for clinical trials (randomized or not) and observational studies assessing PD-(L)1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors in patients with metastatic solid tumors who discontinued treatment for reasons other than PD. Each study had to provide swimmer plots or Kaplan-Meier survival curves enabling the reconstruction of individual patient-level data on progression-free survival (PFS) following the discontinuation of immunotherapy. The primary endpoint was PFS from the date of treatment discontinuation overall and according to tumor histotype, type of treatment and reason of discontinuation. The Combersure\'s method was used to estimate meta-analytical non-parametric summary survival curves assuming random effects at study level.
    UNASSIGNED: Thirty-six studies (2180 patients) were included. The pooled median PFS (mPFS) was 24.7 months (95% CI, 18.8-30.6) and the PFS-rate at 12, 24, and 36 months was respectively 69.8% (95% CI, 63.1-77.3), 51.0% (95% CI, 43.4-59.8) and 34.0% (95% CI, 27.0-42.9). Univariable analysis showed that the mPFS was significantly longer for patients with melanoma (43.0 months), as compared with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC, 13.5 months) and renal cell carcinoma (RCC, 10.0 months; between-strata comparison test p-value < 0.001); for patients treated with anti-PD-(L)1 + anti-CTLA-4 as compared with anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy (44.6 versus 19.9 months; p-value < 0.001), and in NSCLC when the reason of treatment discontinuation was elective as compared with toxicity onset (19.6 versus 4.8 months; p-value = 0.003). The multivariable analysis confirmed these differences.
    UNASSIGNED: The long-term outcome of patients who stopped ICIs for reasons other than PD was substantially affected by clinicopathological features: PFS after treatment discontinuation was longer in patients with melanoma, and/or treated with anti-PD-(L)1 + anti-CTLA-4, and shorter in patients with RCC or in those patients with NSCLC who stopped treatment for toxicity onset.
    UNASSIGNED: The Italian Ministry of University and Research (PRIN 2022Y7HHNW).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肝细胞癌(HCC),一种肝癌,在全球范围内排名第六的最常见癌症,并代表癌症相关死亡的第三大原因。大约一半的HCC患者错过了治愈性治疗的机会,然后仅限于接受全身治疗。目前,全身治疗已经进入免疫治疗时代,特别是随着免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)的出现,这显著提高了晚期HCC患者的预后。对于HCC的新辅助治疗已经成为一种可能性-来自IMbrass050试验的发现表明,ICIs为高风险HCC患者在切除或局部消融后提供无复发生存的益处。然而,只有一小部分个体从系统治疗中获益.因此,迫切需要确定用于治疗反应和结果评估的预测性生物标志物.本研究回顾了HCC全身治疗的历史进展,突出显著的治疗进展。这项研究检查了涉及常规药物和用于HCC治疗的临床试验的全身疗法的发展。以及晚期和/或局部晚期HCC的潜在预测生物标志物。各种研究已经揭示了HCC治疗背景下的潜在生物标志物。这些包括树突状细胞(DC)与新辅助治疗的良好反应的关联,富集的T效应细胞和三级淋巴结构的存在,CD138+浆细胞的鉴定,在接受新辅助卡博替尼和纳武单抗治疗的局部晚期HCC患者中,B细胞与T细胞的空间排列不同。此外,在接受cemiplimab新辅助治疗可切除HCC的患者中,病理反应与肿瘤内细胞三联体相关,肿瘤内细胞三联体由祖细胞CD8+T细胞和成熟DC周围的CXCL13+CD4+T辅助细胞组成.尽管没有广泛认可的用于HCC个体化治疗的预测生物标志物,我们认为新辅助治疗试验在识别和验证方面最有希望.这是因为他们可以从可切除的HCC患者中收集多个样本,尤其是在多元组学中,弥合临床前和临床差距。
    Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a type of liver cancer, ranks as the sixth most prevalent cancer globally and represents the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Approximately half of HCC patients miss the opportunity for curative treatment and are then limited to undergoing systemic therapies. Currently, systemic therapy has entered the era of immunotherapy, particularly with the advent of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), which have significantly enhanced outcomes for patients with advanced HCC. Neoadjuvant treatment for HCC has become a possibility-findings from the IMbrave 050 trial indicated that ICIs offer the benefit of recurrence-free survival for high-risk HCC patients post-resection or local ablation. However, only a small fraction of individuals benefit from systemic therapy. Consequently, there is an urgent need to identify predictive biomarkers for treatment response and outcome assessment. This study reviewed the historical progression of systemic therapy for HCC, highlighting notable therapeutic advancements. This study examined the development of systemic therapies involving conventional drugs and clinical trials utilized in HCC treatment, as well as potential predictive biomarkers for advanced and/or locally advanced HCC. Various studies have revealed potential biomarkers in the context of HCC treatment. These include the association of dendritic cells (DCs) with a favorable response to neoadjuvant therapy, the presence of enriched T effector cells and tertiary lymphoid structures, the identification of CD138+ plasma cells, and distinct spatial arrangements of B cells in close proximity to T cells among responders with locally advanced HCC receiving neoadjuvant cabozantinib and nivolumab treatment. Furthermore, pathological response has been associated with intratumoral cellular triads consisting of progenitor CD8+ T cells and CXCL13+ CD4+ T helper cells surrounding mature DCs in patients receiving neoadjuvant cemiplimab for resectable HCC. Despite no widely recognized predictive biomarkers for HCC individualized treatment, we believe neoadjuvant trials hold the most promise in identifying and validating them. This is because they can collect multiple samples from resectable HCC patients across stages, especially with multi-omics, bridging preclinical and clinical gaps.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    使用免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)导致的格林-巴利综合征(GBS)相对少见,但已有报道。在这里,我们讨论了一例67岁的患者,该患者接受新辅助ICI治疗非小细胞肺癌,然后出现下肢无力和反射障碍,进展为呼吸肌和上肢无力。鉴于ICI在癌症管理中的使用越来越多,意识到神经自身免疫副作用是至关重要的。如果不及时诊断,ICI介导的GBS可能是严重和致命的。我们讨论了ICI诱导的GBS案例,并回顾了有关当前管理方法的文献。
    Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) resulting from the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is relatively uncommon but has been reported. Herein, we discuss a case of a 67-year-old patient who received neoadjuvant ICI for treatment of non-small cell lung cancer and then presented with lower extremity weakness and areflexia, progressing to respiratory muscle and upper extremity weakness. Given the increasing use of ICI in cancer management, awareness of neurological autoimmune side effects is essential. ICI-mediated GBS can be severe and fatal if not diagnosed promptly. We discuss a case of ICI-induced GBS and review literature on current management approaches.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在临床试验中,以高频率评估实验室值。这对患者来说可能会有压力,资源密集型,并且难以实施,例如在基于办公室的设置中。在未来,多中心2期TITAN-RCC试验(NCT02917772),我们调查了如果不那么频繁地评估实验室值,会遗漏多少相关的实验室值变化.转移性肾细胞癌患者(n=207)接受了基于反应的方法,使用nivolumab和nivolumab+ipilimumab增强治疗无反应。我们模拟了在每个第二剂量之前而不是每个剂量的研究药物之前获得的实验室值。我们评估了白细胞计数升高,丙氨酸氨基转移酶,天冬氨酸转氨酶,胆红素,肌酐,淀粉酶,脂肪酶,和促甲状腺激素.根据研究方案定义剂量延迟和停药标准。随着实验室分析频率的降低,很少错过剂量延迟标准:在纳武单抗单药治疗期间,最高<0.1%(3/4382)的评估(1%[2/207]的患者),在纳武单抗+伊匹单抗强化治疗期间,最高为0.2%(1/465)的评估(1%[1/132]的患者).一个例外是脂肪酶相关的剂量延迟,在nivolumab单药治疗期间,在0.6%(25/4204)的评估(7%[15/207]的患者)和0.8%(4/480)的评估(3%[4/134]的患者)在nivolumab+ipilimumab增强期间,但需要出现症状。在nivolumab单药治疗期间,只有淀粉酶(<0.1%[1/3965]的评估[0.5%(1/207)的患者]才会错过停药标准,在nivolumab+ipilimumab期间没有)和脂肪酶(0.1%[5/4204]的评估[2%(4/207)的患者]在nivolumab单药治疗期间;0.2%[1/480]的评估[0.7%(1/134)的患者]在nivolumab+ipilimumab期间).然而,只有有症状的患者会因为淀粉酶或脂肪酶实验室值而不得不停止治疗.总之,在接受nivolumab或nivolumab+ipilimumab治疗的无症状转移性肾细胞癌患者中,减少实验室检查频率似乎是可以接受的.
    In clinical trials, laboratory values are assessed with high frequency. This can be stressful for patients, resource intensive, and difficult to implement, for example in office-based settings. In the prospective, multicentre phase 2 TITAN-RCC trial (NCT02917772), we investigated how many relevant changes in laboratory values would have been missed if laboratory values had been assessed less frequently. Patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (n = 207) received a response-based approach with nivolumab and nivolumab+ipilimumab boosts for non-response. We simulated that laboratory values were obtained before every second dose instead of every dose of the study drug(s). We assessed elevated leukocyte counts, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, bilirubin, creatinine, amylase, lipase, and thyroid-stimulating hormone. Dose delay and discontinuation criteria were defined according to the study protocol. With the reduced frequency of laboratory analyses, dose delay criteria were rarely missed: in a maximum of <0.1% (3/4382) of assessments (1% [2/207] of patients) during nivolumab monotherapy and in a maximum of 0.2% (1/465) of assessments (1% [1/132] of patients) during nivolumab+ipilimumab boosts. An exception was lipase-related dose delay which would have been missed in 0.6% (25/4204) of assessments (7% [15/207] of patients) during nivolumab monotherapy and in 0.8% (4/480) of assessments (3% [4/134] of patients) during nivolumab+ipilimumab boosts, but would have required the presence of symptoms. Discontinuation criteria would have only been missed for amylase (<0.1% [1/3965] of assessments [0.5% (1/207) of patients] during nivolumab monotherapy, none during nivolumab+ipilimumab boosts) and lipase (0.1% [5/4204] of assessments [2% (4/207) of patients] during nivolumab monotherapy; 0.2% [1/480] of assessments [0.7% (1/134) of patients] during nivolumab+ipilimumab boosts). However, only symptomatic patients would have had to discontinue treatment due to amylase or lipase laboratory values. In conclusion, a reduced frequency of laboratory testing appears to be acceptable in asymptomatic patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab or nivolumab+ipilimumab.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    免疫疗法,以免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)的形式,彻底改变了癌症的治疗方法。然而,治疗费用的增加和免疫相关副作用的频率,通常与联合抗体疗法和抗体的Fc片段相关,限制了患者从这些治疗中受益的能力。在这里,我们介绍了质粒编码的PD-1和CTLA-4scFvs(单链可变片段)通过优化的肌内基因递送系统对黑色素瘤的治疗效果.一次注射后,小鼠血清中质粒编码的ICIscFv持续高于150ng/mL持续3周,达到600ng/mL的峰值。编码PD-1和CTLA-4scFvs的质粒肌内递送显著改变了肿瘤微环境,肿瘤生长延迟,和延长黑色素瘤小鼠的生存期。此外,没有观察到明显的毒性,这表明这种方法可以提高ICIs联合治疗的生物安全性。总的来说,使用肌内质粒递送在体内表达ICIscFvs可能会发展成为一种可靠的,负担得起的,和安全的免疫治疗技术,扩大可用的基于抗体的基因治疗系统的范围。
    Immunotherapy, in the shape of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has completely changed the treatment of cancer. However, the increasing expense of treatment and the frequency of immune-related side effects, which are frequently associated with combination antibody therapies and Fc fragment of antibody, have limited the patient\'s ability to benefit from these treatments. Herein, we presented the therapeutic effects of the plasmid-encoded PD-1 and CTLA-4 scFvs (single-chain variable fragment) for melanoma via an optimized intramuscular gene delivery system. After a single injection, the plasmid-encoded ICI scFv in mouse sera continued to be above 150 ng/mL for 3 weeks and reached peak amounts of 600 ng/mL. Intramuscular delivery of plasmid encoding PD-1 and CTLA-4 scFvs significantly changed the tumor microenvironment, delayed tumor growth, and prolonged survival in melanoma-bearing mice. Furthermore, no significant toxicity was observed, suggesting that this approach could improve the biosafety of ICIs combination therapy. Overall, the expression of ICI scFvs in vivo using intramuscular plasmid delivery could potentially develop into a reliable, affordable, and safe immunotherapy technique, expanding the range of antibody-based gene therapy systems that are available.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    TIM-3,一种抑制性检查点受体,可能会引发抗PD-1/抗PD-L1免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)耐药性。TIM-3RNA表达在ICIs治疗的患者中各种晚期实体瘤中的预测影响尚待确定。它们的预后意义仍未被探索。我们研究了TIM-3转录组表达和临床结果。我们通过OmniSeq数据库检查了TIM-3RNA表达数据。TIM-3转录组模式针对参考群体(735个肿瘤)进行校准,适应内部管家基因,并按百分位数计算。总的来说,评估了514名患者(31种癌症类型;489名患有晚期/转移性疾病和临床注释的患者)。90个肿瘤(514个肿瘤中的17.5%)具有高(≥75百分位RNA等级)TIM-3表达。胰腺癌的TIM-3高表达因子比例最大(55例患者中的36%)。尽管如此,癌症类型之间存在差异,例如,12.7%的胰腺癌具有较低的TIM-3(<25百分位数)水平。高TIM-3表达与高PD-L2RNA表达(比值比(OR)9.63,95%置信区间(CI)4.91-19.4,P<0.001)和高VISTARNA表达(OR2.71,95%CI1.43-5.13,P=0.002)独立且显着相关,都是多变量分析。高TIM-3RNA与从未接受ICIs治疗的272例转移性疾病患者的总生存期(OS)无关。这表明它不是一个预后因素。然而,高TIM-3表达预测217例ICI治疗患者的中位OS(但非无进展生存期)更长(P=0.0033;中位OS,2.84年与1.21年(高与不高的TIM-3)),尽管没有保留在多变量分析中。总之,TIM-3RNA表达在恶性肿瘤之间和内部是可变的,高水平与高PD-L2和VISTA检查点以及胰腺癌相关。作为精确免疫疗法策略的一部分,个体肿瘤免疫组评估和共同靶向共表达检查点值得在前瞻性试验中进行探索。
    TIM-3, an inhibitory checkpoint receptor, may invoke anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) resistance. The predictive impact of TIM-3 RNA expression in various advanced solid tumors among patients treated with ICIs is yet to be determined, and their prognostic significance also remains unexplored. We investigated TIM-3 transcriptomic expression and clinical outcomes. We examined TIM-3 RNA expression data through the OmniSeq database. TIM-3 transcriptomic patterns were calibrated against a reference population (735 tumors), adjusted to internal housekeeping genes, and calculated as percentiles. Overall, 514 patients (31 cancer types; 489 patients with advanced/metastatic disease and clinical annotation) were assessed. Ninety tumors (17.5% of 514) had high (≥75th percentile RNA rank) TIM-3 expression. Pancreatic cancer had the greatest proportion of TIM-3 high expressors (36% of 55 patients). Still, there was variability within cancer types with, for instance, 12.7% of pancreatic cancers harboring low TIM-3 (<25th percentile) levels. High TIM-3 expression independently and significantly correlated with high PD-L2 RNA expression (odds ratio (OR) 9.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.91-19.4, P<0.001) and high VISTA RNA expression (OR 2.71, 95% CI 1.43-5.13, P=0.002), all in multivariate analysis. High TIM-3 RNA did not correlate with overall survival (OS) from time of metastatic disease in the 272 patients who never received ICIs, suggesting that it is not a prognostic factor. However, high TIM-3 expression predicted longer median OS (but not progression-free survival) in 217 ICI-treated patients (P=0.0033; median OS, 2.84 versus 1.21 years (high versus not-high TIM-3)), albeit not retained in multivariable analysis. In summary, TIM-3 RNA expression was variable between and within malignancies, and high levels associated with high PD-L2 and VISTA checkpoints and with pancreatic cancer. Individual tumor immunomic assessment and co-targeting co-expressed checkpoints merits exploration in prospective trials as part of a precision immunotherapy strategy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号