Duodenal stump fistula (DSF) is a dangerous complication after gastrectomy. There is no consensus on the management of DSF. Sometimes, emergency surgery may be necessary. We present the case who underwent subtotal gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction for advanced gastric cancer. After that surgery, we diagnosed DSF due to pancreatic fistula, and performed reoperation because of hemodynamic instability due to diffuse peritonitis and sepsis. We resected the stump and closed with handsewn suturing and inserted three intra-abdominal drainage tubes, including a dual drainage tube around the duodenal stump. Although there was a recurrence of DSF, because of the continuous and absolute drainage, the patient improved and discharged on postoperative Day 59. From this experience, diligent debridement and a continuous suction dual drainage system, intraluminal drain of the duodenum, and biliary diversion may be an effective surgical management for DFS.

UNASSIGNED: The Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) has become an important predictive tool for assessing patients\' nutritional status and immune competence. It is widely used in prognostic evaluations for various cancer patients. However, the prognostic relevance of the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) in gastric or gastro-esophageal junction cancer patients (GC/GEJC) undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) treatment remains unclear. This meta-analysis aimed to determine the prognostic impact of PNI in this specific patient cohort.
UNASSIGNED: We conducted a thorough literature search, covering prominent databases such as PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, SpringerLink, and the Cochrane Library. The search spanned from the inception of these databases up to December 5, 2023. Employing the 95% confidence interval and Hazard Ratio (HR), the study systematically evaluated the relationship between PNI and key prognostic indicators, including the objective remission rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in GC/GEJC patients undergoing ICI treatment.
UNASSIGNED: Eight studies comprising 813 eligible patients were selected. With 7 studies consistently demonstrating superior Overall Survival (OS) in the high-Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) group compared to their low-PNI counterparts (HR 0.58, 95% CI: 0.47-0.71, P<0.001). Furthermore, the results derived from 6 studies pointed out that the significant correlation between he low-PNI and poorer progression-free survival (PFS) (HR 0.58, 95% CI: 0.47-0.71, P<0.001). Subgroup analyses were performed to validate the robustness of the results. In addition, we conducted a meta-analysis of three studies examining the correlation between PNI and objective response rate/disease control rate (ORR/DCR) and found that the ORR/DCR was significantly superior in the high PNI group (ORR: RR: 1.24, P=0.002; DCR: RR: 1.43, P=0.008).
UNASSIGNED: This meta-analysis indicates that the low-PNI in GC/GEJC patients undergoing ICI treatment is significantly linked to worse OS and PFS. Therefore, PNI can serve as a prognostic indicator of post-treatment outcomes in patients with GC receiving ICIs. Further prospective studies are required to assess the reliability of these findings.
UNASSIGNED: https://inplasy.com/, identifier INPLASY202450133.

The objective of this article is to highlight the clinical features, screening, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of gastric cancer (GC). Early GC is often asymptomatic leading to frequent delays in diagnosis. Weight loss and persistent abdominal pain are the most common symptoms at initial diagnosis. The diagnosis of GC typically involves a combination of endoscopy, biopsy, and imaging studies. Endoscopic resection techniques are emerging as successful treatment options for early GC. Treatment options for advanced GC include surgery and chemotherapy. The first line chemotherapy for advanced GC consists of doublet therapy with a combination of platinum and fluoropyrimidines. Trastuzumab, a monoclonal antibody, is used in the treatment of human epidermal growth factor 2 positive GCs. Antiangiogenic agents and immunotherapy are also useful in the treatment of GC. Currently there are no GC screening guidelines in the United States, but they exist in other regions where there is increased prevalence of GC. Prevention strategies for GC include Helicobacter pylori eradication and adoption of a healthy diet consisting of fruits and vegetables.

Objectives The current carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) cutoff value demonstrated high specificity but low sensitivity. Therefore, we used new cutoff values to evaluate the clinical impact of perioperative CA125 in gastric cancer. Methods This study retrospectively analyzed 525 patients with gastric cancer (349 males and 176 females), of whom 445 patients underwent R0 resection and 80 patients underwent R1/R2 resection between 2011 and 2020. The receiver operating characteristic curve indicated preoperative and postoperative cutoff CA125 values of 15.7 IU/mL and 17.3 IU/mL, respectively, to predict overall survival. Furthermore, we analyzed changes in postoperative CA125 levels and evaluated their prognostic impact using multivariate analysis. Results The preoperative CA125-positive rate was 25%. Males, advanced TNM factors, and noncurative resection cases demonstrated significantly higher positive rates than the other group. The preoperative CA125-positive group exhibited a significantly higher noncurative resection rate than the preoperative CA125-negative group (32% versus 10%, P < 0.01). Preoperatively, CA125-positive status was an independent poor prognostic factor (P < 0.01), and at three months postoperatively, it tended to be a poor prognostic factor. Conclusions High preoperative CA125 (>15.7 IU/mL) was a significant predictor for noncurative resection and poor overall prognosis in gastric cancer. Furthermore, postoperative CA125-positive status three months postoperatively was also a potential predictor of recurrence and poor prognosis.

UNASSIGNED: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical impact of the Global Immune-Nutrition-Information Index (GINI) in patients with gastric cancer (GC) who received curative treatment and to clarify the potential of the GINI as a biomarker.
UNASSIGNED: Patients who underwent curative resection for GC at Yokohama City University between 2005 and 2020 were selected based on their medical records. The GINI was calculated as follows: GINI=[C-reactive protein × platelet × monocyte × neutrophil]/[albumin × lymphocyte].
UNASSIGNED: A total of 258 patients were included in this study. Of these, 169 patients were categorized into the GINI-low group and 89 into the GINI-high group using a cut-off value of 1,730. The three- and five-year overall survival (OS) rates were 86.4% and 78.4%, respectively, in the GINI-low group, and 66.4% and 58.3% in the GINI-high group (p<0.001). In a multivariate analysis for OS, the GINI was identified as an independent prognostic factor [hazard ratio (HR)=1.772; 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.053-2.979, p=0.031]. Similar results were observed for RFS. In addition, the GINI affected the perioperative clinical course, including postoperative surgical complications and postoperative adjuvant treatment.
UNASSIGNED: The GINI is a promising biomarker for the treatment and management of GC.

Gastric cancer, the fifth most prevalent cancer worldwide, is often diagnosed in advanced stages with limited treatment options. Examining the tumor microenvironment (TME) and its metabolic reprogramming can provide insights for better diagnosis and treatment. This study investigates the link between TME factors and metabolic activity in gastric cancer using bulk and single-cell RNA-sequencing data. We identified two molecular subtypes in gastric cancer by analyzing the distinct expression patterns of 81 prognostic genes related to the TME and metabolism, which exhibited significant protein-level interactions. The high-risk subtype had increased stromal content, fibroblast and M2 macrophage infiltration, elevated glycosaminoglycans/glycosphingolipids biosynthesis, and fat metabolism, along with advanced clinicopathological features. It also exhibited low mutation rates and microsatellite instability, associating it with the mesenchymal phenotype. In contrast, the low-risk group showed higher tumor content and upregulated protein and sugar metabolism. We identified a 15-gene prognostic signature representing these characteristics, including CPVL, KYNU, CD36, and GPX3, strongly correlated with M2 macrophages, validated through single-cell analysis and an internal cohort. Despite resistance to immunotherapy, the high-risk group showed sensitivity to molecular targeted agents directed at IGF-1R (BMS-754807) and the PI3K-mTOR pathways (AZD8186, AZD8055). We experimentally validated these promising drugs for their inhibitory effects on MKN45 and MKN28 gastric cells. This study unveils the intricate interplay between TME and metabolic pathways in gastric cancer, offering potential for enhanced diagnosis, patient stratification, and personalized treatment. Understanding molecular features in each subtype enriches our comprehension of gastric cancer heterogeneity and potential therapeutic targets.

Comprehensive genome profiling (CGP) is expected to widen the scope of cancer drug options by identifying the genes involved in carcinogenesis. However, a few patients can access recommended treatments following CGP. Herein, we report a case in which pemigatinib, a selective fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitor, was used as last-line therapy to treat a patient with advanced gastric cancer exhibiting FGFR2 genomic alterations, as determined by CGP testing. The patient (male, 52 years old) was diagnosed with advanced gastric cancer (cStage IV, cT4aN3M1 [LYM], por, HER2 0, microsatellite stable) and received docetaxel + cisplatin + S-1 (7 cycles), irinotecan + ramucirumab (11 cycles), and nivolumab (3 cycles), but experienced progressive disease (PD). Subsequently, FoundationOne Liquid CDx testing was conducted, revealing FGFR2 rearrangement and amplification; however, no clinical trials on genotype-matched therapies for FGFR2 alterations were available. After three cycles of TAS-102, the patient experienced PD and provided consent for the off-label use of pemigatinib. The Cancer Genomics Medical Committee of our hospital approved the self-funded treatment. The patient had markedly decreased CEA and CA19-9 levels after treatment initiation, but experienced PD after five courses. Over the treatment course, grade 1 hyperphosphatemia and onychomadesis were observed. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of pemigatinib therapy employed in a patient with advanced gastric cancer exhibiting FGFR2 gene alterations. This case could serve as a notable example of tumor-agnostic therapy to broaden treatment options for gastric cancer patients with rare genetic alterations.

Siah E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 1 (SIAH1) has been reported to participate in the development of several human cancers, including gastric cancer. However, the effect and mechanism of SIAH1 on the migration and invasion of gastric cancer cells need be further explored. Here, we first analyzed the clinical value of SIAH1 in gastric cancer, and found that SIAH1 was up-regulated in gastric cancer and associated with a poor prognosis. In addition, silencing of SIAH1 significantly inhibited the migration and invasion of gastric cancer cells through inhibiting the expression of matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP9), while overexpression of SIAH1 had the opposite effect. Molecularly, we provided the evidence that reversion-inducing cysteine-rich protein with Kazal motifs (RECK) was a potential substrate of SIAH1. We determined that SIAH1 could destabilize RECK through promoting its ubiquitination and degradation via proteasome pathway. We also found RECK was involved in SIAH1-regulated gastric cancer cell migration and invasion. In conclusion, SIAH1 is up-regulated in gastric cancer, which promotes the migration and invasion of gastric cancer cells through regulating RECK-MMP9 pathway.

BACKGROUND: Body weight loss (BWL) after gastrectomy impact on the short- and long-term outcomes. Oral nutritional supplement (ONS) has potential to prevent BWL in patients after gastrectomy. However, there is no consistent evidence supporting the beneficial effects of ONS on BWL, muscle strength and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This study aimed to evaluate the effects of ONS formulated primarily with carbohydrate and protein on BWL, muscle strength, and HRQoL.
METHODS: This will be a multicenter, open-label, parallel, randomized controlled trial in patients with gastric cancer who will undergo gastrectomy. A total of 120 patients who will undergo gastrectomy will be randomly assigned to the ONS group or usual care (control) group in a 1:1 ratio. The stratification factors will be the clinical stage (I or ≥ II) and surgical procedures (total gastrectomy or other procedure). In the ONS group, the patients will receive 400 kcal (400 ml)/day of ONS from postoperative day 5 to 7, and the intervention will continue postoperatively for 8 weeks. The control group patients will be given a regular diet. The primary outcome will be the percentage of BWL (%BWL) from baseline to 8 weeks postoperatively. The secondary outcomes will be muscle strength (handgrip strength), HRQoL (EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-OG25, EQ-5D-5L), nutritional status (hemoglobin, lymphocyte count, albumin), and dietary intake. All analyses will be performed on an intention-to-treat basis.
CONCLUSIONS: This study will provide evidence showing whether or not ONS with simple nutritional ingredients can improve patient adherence and HRQoL by reducing BWL after gastrectomy. If supported by the study results, nutritional support with simple nutrients will be recommended to patients after gastrectomy for gastric cancer.
BACKGROUND: jRCTs051230012; Japan Registry of Clinical Trails. Registered on Apr. 13, 2023.

UNASSIGNED: Complexities of robotic distal gastrectomy (RDG) give reason to assess physician\'s surgical skill. Varying levels in surgical skill affect patient outcomes. We aim to investigate how a novel artificial intelligence (AI) model can be used to evaluate surgical skill in RDG by recognizing surgical instruments.
UNASSIGNED: Fifty-five consecutive robotic surgical videos of RDG for gastric cancer were analyzed. We used Deeplab, a multi-stage temporal convolutional network, and it trained on 1234 manually annotated images. The model was then tested on 149 annotated images for accuracy. Deep learning metrics such as Intersection over Union (IoU) and accuracy were assessed, and the comparison between experienced and non-experienced surgeons based on usage of instruments during infrapyloric lymph node dissection was performed.
UNASSIGNED: We annotated 540 Cadiere forceps, 898 Fenestrated bipolars, 359 Suction tubes, 307 Maryland bipolars, 688 Harmonic scalpels, 400 Staplers, and 59 Large clips. The average IoU and accuracy were 0.82 ± 0.12 and 87.2 ± 11.9% respectively. Moreover, the percentage of each instrument\'s usage to overall infrapyloric lymphadenectomy duration predicted by AI were compared. The use of Stapler and Large clip were significantly shorter in the experienced group compared to the non-experienced group.
UNASSIGNED: This study is the first to report that surgical skill can be successfully and accurately determined by an AI model for RDG. Our AI gives us a way to recognize and automatically generate instance segmentation of the surgical instruments present in this procedure. Use of this technology allows unbiased, more accessible RDG surgical skill.