blood pressure management

血压管理
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:2型糖尿病是墨西哥的主要公共卫生问题,因为它的高患病率和未来几年对这种疾病的预测。关于与慢性病相关的多学科护理的研究结果已被证明是有效的,基于以患者为中心的结果的测量,糖尿病患者综合护理中心(CAIPaDi)是一项多学科计划,旨在减少糖尿病并发症。本案例研究旨在说明实施健康结果测量的结果,并证明通过以患者为中心的方法建立综合护理模型的有益效果。
    方法:对2013年至2023年在CAIPaDi计划中治疗的2型糖尿病患者的综合护理指标进行了描述性分析。结果是根据国际健康结果测量联盟(ICHOM)提出的糖尿病标准结果集构建的。
    结果:完成了为期五年的咨询基线和预期注册,符合ICHOM集26个指标中的25个。在糖尿病控制中,56.5%的患者A1c≤7%,87.9%血压≤130/80mmHg,60.9%的人患有LDL-胆固醇<100mg/dl,在年度咨询期间,肥胖率从42.19%下降到30.6%。首次就诊前诊断时间较短是整体改善计划依从性的关键(P=0.02)。在急性事件中,仅2例患者发生高血糖危象,8例患者发生严重低血糖.对于慢性并发症,没有发生下肢截肢。心血管结局发生率<1%。对牙周病进行了分析,牙周炎从82.9%下降到78.7%。死亡率报告很低,COVID-19是主要的死亡原因。患者报告的结果显示焦虑减少,抑郁症,和随访期间的糖尿病困扰。
    结论:注册护理质量指标在综合护理计划中是可行的。它可以改善医疗,心理健康,和2型糖尿病患者的生活方式结局,并为规划健康计划提供相关数据。在计划依从性之前进行快速诊断对于患者的整体改善至关重要。
    BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes is a major public health issue in Mexico due to its high prevalence and its projection for the coming years for this disease. Findings on multidisciplinary care related to chronic diseases have proven effective, based on measurement of patient-centered outcomes, The Center of Comprehensive Care for Patients with Diabetes (CAIPaDi) is a multidisciplinary program focused on reducing diabetes complications. This case study aims to illustrate the results of implementing health outcomes measurements and demonstrate the beneficial effects of establishing a comprehensive model of care through a patient-centered approach.
    METHODS: A descriptive analysis of the comprehensive care indicators of patients with type 2 diabetes treated in the CAIPaDi program between 2013 and 2023 was conducted. The results were structured according to the standard set of outcomes for diabetes proposed by the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurements (ICHOM).
    RESULTS: The baseline and prospective registration of consultations was completed for five years, complying with 25 of the 26 indicators of the ICHOM set. In diabetes control, 56.5% of patients had A1c ≤ 7%, 87.9% had BP ≤ 130/80 mmHg, 60.9% had LDL-cholesterol < 100 mg/dl, and obesity rates decreased from 42.19% to 30.6% during annual consultations. Fewer years of diagnosis before the first visit is key to overall improvement in program adherence (P = 0.02). In acute events, a hyperglycemic crisis occurred in only two cases and severe hypoglycemia episodes in 8 patients. For chronic complications, no lower limb amputations occurred. Cardiovascular outcomes occurred in < 1%. Periodontal disease was analyzed, and periodontitis decreased from 82.9% to 78.7%. Mortality reports were low, with COVID-19 being the main cause of death. Patient-reported outcomes demonstrated reductions in anxiety, depression, and diabetes distress during follow-up.
    CONCLUSIONS: Registering quality-of-care indicators is feasible in a comprehensive care program. It allows improving the medical, mental health, and lifestyle outcomes of patients with type 2 diabetes and provides relevant data for planning health programs. A quick diagnosis before program adherence is crucial for overall improvement in patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景2型糖尿病(T2DM)常与高血压并存,显著增加心血管风险。生活方式改变咨询在管理T2DM及其合并症方面显示出希望。然而,血压控制咨询的最佳频率和结构仍不确定。我们的研究通过比较两种咨询策略的结果来检查管理T2DM患者血压的最佳方法:单次咨询和随时间的定期咨询。方法共纳入110例糖尿病患者,每组52例患者术后失访。一项随机对照试验比较了一次性咨询(对照)与六个月的定期咨询(干预)对生活方式的改变。称重机,测风仪,24小时饮食召回,食物频率问卷,生化血糖水平分析,电话跟进是使用的基本工具。使用SPSS24.0版(IBMCorp.,Armonk,NY,美国),采用描述性统计数据,包括频率,百分比,graphs,意思是,和标准偏差。使用概率(p)计算测试5%水平的统计显著性。Kolmogorov-Smirnov检验证实正态分布(p>0.05)。参数测试,特别是独立的t检验,用于连续变量的组间比较,而分类变量使用卡方检验或Fisher精确检验进行分析。随时间的组内比较采用连续变量的重复测量方差分析。使用配对t检验评估6个月后组内的变化。所有统计分析均符合P<0.05的显著性水平。结果基线时的性别分布与对照组相似(55.8%为男性,44.2%女性)和干预(46.2%男性,53.8%女性)群体,无显著性差异(p=0.327)。对照组平均体重为66.67±11.51kg,干预组为67.14±11.19kg(p=0.835),体重指数为25.61±4.09kg/m²和26.29±6.01kg/m²,分别(p=0.503)。临床参数,如空腹血糖,餐后血糖,糖化血红蛋白,对照组和干预组基线血压差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。六个月后,与对照组相比,干预组表现出降低血压的趋势,但差异无统计学意义。对照组平均收缩压为132.15±14.867mmHg,干预组为129.15±9.123mmHg(p=0.218)。6个月期间的血压变化显示干预组内有显著下降,而对照组的变化没有达到统计学意义。干预组收缩压的平均差值为5.54±9.77mmHg(p=0.0001),表明显著减少,而对照组的增加较小,统计学上无统计学意义,为2.308±9.388mmHg(p=0.082)。结论本研究通过比较一次性与T2DM管理中的定期咨询。虽然定期咨询显示出改善舒张压的希望,需要进一步的研究来了解其细微差别效应,并优化对T2DM患者的生活方式干预.
    Background Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) often coexists with hypertension, significantly increasing cardiovascular risks. Lifestyle modification counseling has shown promise in managing T2DM and its comorbidities. However, the optimal frequency and structure of counseling for blood pressure control remain uncertain. Our study examines the best approach for managing blood pressure in T2DM patients by comparing the outcomes of two counseling strategies: a single session and periodic counseling over time. Methodology A total of 110 diabetic patients were enrolled, with 52 patients in each group after loss to follow-up. A randomized controlled trial compared one-time counseling (control) to six months of periodic counseling (intervention) on lifestyle modification. A weighing machine, stadiometer, 24-hour dietary recall, food frequency questionnaire, biochemical blood sugar level analysis, and telephonic follow-up were the essential tools used. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 24.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), employing descriptive statistics, including frequencies, percentages, graphs, mean, and standard deviation. Statistical significance at the 5% level was tested using probability (p) calculations. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test confirmed normal distribution (p > 0.05). Parametric tests, specifically independent t-tests, were used for between-group comparisons of continuous variables, while categorical variables were analyzed using the chi-square test or Fisher\'s exact test. Intragroup comparisons over time employed repeated-measures analysis of variance for continuous variables. Changes within groups after six months were assessed using paired t-tests. All statistical analyses adhered to a significance level of p < 0.05. Results The gender distribution at baseline was similar between the control (55.8% male, 44.2% female) and intervention (46.2% male, 53.8% female) groups, with no significant differences (p = 0.327). The mean weight was 66.67 ± 11.51 kg in the control group and 67.14 ± 11.19 kg in the intervention group (p = 0.835), and the body mass index was 25.61 ± 4.09 kg/m² and 26.29 ± 6.01 kg/m², respectively (p = 0.503). Clinical parameters such as fasting blood sugar, postprandial blood sugar, glycosylated hemoglobin, and blood pressure showed no significant differences between the control and intervention groups at baseline (p > 0.05). After six months, the intervention group exhibited a trend toward lower blood pressure compared to the control group, but the differences were not statistically significant. The mean systolic blood pressure was 132.15 ± 14.867 mmHg in the control group and 129.15 ± 9.123 mmHg in the intervention group (p = 0.218). Changes in blood pressure over the six-month period showed significant decreases within the intervention group, while changes in the control group did not reach statistical significance. The mean difference in systolic blood pressure in the intervention group was 5.54 ± 9.77 mmHg (p = 0.0001), indicating a notable reduction, while the control group had a smaller and statistically insignificant increase of 2.308 ± 9.388 mmHg (p = 0.082). Conclusions This study addresses a significant gap in the literature by comparing the efficacy of one-time vs. periodic counseling in T2DM management. While periodic counseling shows promise in improving diastolic blood pressure, further research is needed to understand its nuanced effects and optimize lifestyle interventions for T2DM patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:从鄞州的中国电子健康档案研究(CHERRY)研究中,评估在社区人群中启动抗高血压治疗对心血管疾病一级预防的不同策略的健康效益和干预效率。
    方法:使用决策分析马尔可夫模型来模拟和比较不同的降压启动策略,包括:策略1,对收缩压(SBP)≥140mmHg的中国成年人开始降压治疗(2020年中国心血管疾病一级预防指南);策略2,对SBP≥130mmHg的中国成年人开始降压治疗;策略3,对SBP≥140mmHg的中国成年人开始降压治疗,或SBP在130至140mmHg之间且具有心血管疾病的高风险(2017年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会预防指南,检测,评估,和成人高血压的管理);策略4,对SBP≥160mmHg的中国成年人开始降压治疗,或SBP在140至160mmHg之间且心血管疾病的高风险(2019年英国国家健康与护理卓越研究所成人高血压指南:诊断和管理)。根据2019年世界卫生组织心血管疾病风险图表,高10年心血管风险被定义为预测风险超过10%。不同的策略用马尔可夫模型模拟了十年(周期),参数主要来自CHERRY研究或发表的文献。经过十个周期的模拟,质量调整生命年数(QALY),计算心血管事件和全因死亡,以评估每种策略的健康益处,计算每个心血管事件或全因死亡需要治疗的数量(NNT),以评估干预效果.对心血管疾病发病率的不确定度进行单因素敏感性分析,对干预措施风险比的不确定度进行概率敏感性分析。
    结果:共纳入213987名35-79岁无心血管疾病的中国成年人。与策略1相比,策略2中可以预防的心血管事件数量增加了666(95%UI:334-975),而每次预防心血管事件的NNT增加了10(95%UI:7-20)。与策略1相反,策略3中可以预防的心血管事件数量增加了388(95%UI:194-569),预防的每次心血管事件的NNT减少了6(95%UI:4-12),表明策略3具有更好的健康益处和干预效率。与策略1相比,尽管在策略4中可以预防的心血管事件数量减少了193(95%UI:98-281),但预防的每个心血管事件的NNT减少了18(95%UI:13-37),效率更高。敏感性分析结果一致。
    结论:在中国经济发达地区开始抗高血压治疗时,结合心血管风险评估的策略比单纯基于SBP阈值的策略更有效.建议采用不同SBP阈值的心血管风险评估策略,以平衡不同人群的健康益处和干预效率。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the health benefits and intervention efficiency of different strategies of initiating antihypertensive therapy for the primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases in a community-based Chinese population from the Chinese electronic health records research in Yinzhou (CHERRY) study.
    METHODS: A decision-analytic Markov model was used to simulate and compare different antihypertensive initiation strategies, including: Strategy 1, initiation of antihypertensive therapy for Chinese adults with systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥140 mmHg (2020 Chinese guideline on the primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases); Strategy 2, initiation of antihypertensive therapy for Chinese adults with SBP ≥130 mmHg; Strategy 3, initiation of antihypertensive therapy for Chinese adults with SBP≥140 mmHg, or with SBP between 130 and 140 mmHg and at high risk of cardiovascular diseases (2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults); Strategy 4, initiation of antihypertensive therapy for Chinese adults with SBP≥160 mmHg, or with SBP between 140 and 160 mmHg and at high risk of cardiovascular diseases (2019 United Kingdom National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guideline for the hypertension in adults: Diagnosis and management). The high 10-year cardiovascular risk was defined as the predicted risk over 10% based on the 2019 World Health Organization cardiovascular disease risk charts. Different strategies were simulated by the Markov model for ten years (cycles), with parameters mainly from the CHERRY study or published literature. After ten cycles of simulation, the numbers of quality-adjusted life years (QALY), cardiovascular events and all-cause deaths were calculated to evaluate the health benefits of each strategy, and the numbers needed to treat (NNT) for each cardiovascular event or all-cause death could be prevented were calculated to assess the intervention efficiency. One-way sensitivity analysis on the uncertainty of incidence rates of cardiovascular disease and probabilistic sensitivity analysis on the uncertainty of hazard ratios of interventions were conducted.
    RESULTS: A total of 213 987 Chinese adults aged 35-79 years without cardiovascular diseases were included. Compared with strategy 1, the number of cardiovascular events that could be prevented in strategy 2 increased by 666 (95% UI: 334-975), while the NNT per cardiovascular event prevented increased by 10 (95% UI: 7-20). In contrast to strategy 1, the number of cardiovascular events that could be prevented in strategy 3 increased by 388 (95% UI: 194-569), and the NNT per cardiovascular event prevented decreased by 6 (95% UI: 4-12), suggesting that strategy 3 had better health benefits and intervention efficiency. Compared to strategy 1, although the number of cardiovascular events that could be prevented decreased by 193 (95% UI: 98-281) in strategy 4, the NNT per cardiovascular event prevented decreased by 18 (95% UI: 13-37) with better efficiency. The results were consistent in the sensitivity analyses.
    CONCLUSIONS: When initiating antihypertensive therapy in an economically developed area of China, the strategy combined with cardiovascular risk assessment is more efficient than those purely based on the SBP threshold. The cardiovascular risk assessment strategy with different SBP thresholds is suggested to balance health benefits and intervention efficiency in diverse populations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    海地≥40岁成年人的高血压患病率几乎是美洲国家的两倍。海地健康倡议(HHI)制定了高血压管理协议,用于蒂莫的外展诊所,海地的一个农村山区社区。本研究旨在评估高血压方案治疗40岁以上成人和重度高血压孕妇的有效性。
    这项回顾性纵向研究包括了209名患者,共1148次门诊就诊/就诊。对2014年4月至2019年4月期间11个半年期外展诊所的去识别医疗记录进行了审查以进行分析。描述性统计,配对t检验,并进行了多层次模型。主要结果是每次临床就诊时的收缩压和舒张压测量。
    在研究中(n=1148次访问),高血压和重度高血压患病率分别为79·8%和38·4%。多水平模型显示每次就诊收缩压降低0·29mmHg(p=0·37),舒张压降低0·66mmHg(p<0·001)。个体因素和方案依从性不能预测血压的降低。
    有效管理难以接触到的人群中的高血压和其他慢性疾病需要全面的宣传工作,以解决护理前因,结构,和过程。尽管外展诊所使弱势群体可以获得治疗,协议,使用先前证明有效的药物,对重度高血压患者的血压降低影响不大。
    UNASSIGNED: Haiti\'s hypertension prevalence among adults ≥40 years of age is nearly twice that of nations in the Americas. Haiti Health Initiative (HHI) developed a hypertension management protocol for use in outreach clinics in Timo, a rural mountainous community in Haiti. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the hypertension protocol for treating adults ≥40 years of age and pregnant women with severe hypertension.
    UNASSIGNED: This retrospective longitudinal study included 209 patients across 1148 clinic visits/encounters. De-identified medical records from 11 biannual outreach clinics between April 2014 to April 2019 were reviewed for analysis. Descriptive statistics, paired t-tests, and multilevel models were performed. The primary outcome was systolic and diastolic blood pressure measurements at each clinic visit.
    UNASSIGNED: In the study (n = 1148 visits), hypertension and severe hypertension prevalence were respectively 79·8% and 38·4%. Multilevel models showed a decrease of 0·29 mmHg (p = 0·37) in systolic blood pressure and a decrease in diastolic blood pressure of 0·66 mmHg (p < 0·001) per visit. Individual factors and protocol adherence did not predict a reduction in blood pressure.
    UNASSIGNED: Effective management of hypertension and other chronic conditions among hard-to-reach populations with limited healthcare access requires comprehensive outreach efforts that address care antecedents, structures, and processes. Although outreach clinics made treatment accessible to vulnerable populations, the protocol, which used medications with previously demonstrated efficacy, had little impact on reducing blood pressure in patients with severe hypertension.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    已知多发性硬化症与交感神经和副交感神经心血管自主神经失调有关。因此,患有多发性硬化症合并症的患者代表了心脏手术中潜在的挑战性患者群体,特别是在泵上操作。尽管如此,关于体外循环期间的血流动力学以及接受心脏手术的多发性硬化症患者的最佳灌注策略知之甚少.
    在本报告中,作者描述了一名复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者,因主动脉瓣和二尖瓣狭窄和三尖瓣关闭不全而成功接受了三瓣手术。在整个体外循环时间以及再灌注期间,注意到临时压力下降形式的明显血压变化。
    压力变化不归因于手术,药理学或灌注相关操作。因此,它们很可能代表体外循环期间出现的心血管自主神经失调的症状.在这个病人身上,血压变化自发终止,并保持在可接受范围内,无需外部校正.
    在治疗患有多发性硬化症合并症的患者时,应考虑心血管自主神经失调导致的潜在压力变异性,以避免体外循环期间过度校正或校正不足导致的血压波动增加.
    UNASSIGNED: Multiple sclerosis is known to be associated with both sympathetic and parasympathetic cardiovascular autonomic dysregulation. Thus, patients with multiple sclerosis comorbidity represent a potentially challenging patient population in cardiac surgery, especially in on-pump operations. Despite this, very little is known about the hemodynamics during cardiopulmonary bypass and the optimal perfusion strategy for patients with multiple sclerosis undergoing cardiac operations.
    UNASSIGNED: In this report, the authors describe a patient with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, who underwent successful triple valve operation for aortic and mitral stenosis and tricuspid valve insufficiency. Distinct blood pressure variations in form of temporary pressure dips were noted during total cardiopulmonary bypass time as well as during the reperfusion period.
    UNASSIGNED: Pressure variations were not attributable to surgical, pharmacological or perfusion-related manoeuvres. Thus, they most likely represent symptoms of cardiovascular autonomic dysregulation manifesting during cardiopulmonary bypass. In this patient, blood pressure variations terminated spontaneously and remained within an acceptable range without external correction.
    UNASSIGNED: When treating patients with multiple sclerosis comorbidity, the potential pressure variability due to cardiovascular autonomic dysregulation should be taken into consideration to avoid increased blood pressure volatility due to overcorrection or undercorrection during cardiopulmonary bypass.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这篇全面的综述在神经外科和血管内动脉瘤介入治疗的背景下,探讨了脑灌注和血压管理的复杂动态。该综述强调了维持微妙的血液动力学平衡的关键作用,考虑到大脑对血压波动的敏感性。强调脑灌注的调节机制,特别是自动调节,该研究提倡采用细微差别和个性化的血压控制方法。关键发现强调了在神经外科和血管内手术中坚持定制的血压目标以减轻缺血性和出血性并发症风险的重要性。对临床实践的影响是深远的,呼吁提高血液动力学管理的意识和精确度。这篇综述最后提出了对未来研究的建议,敦促探索最佳血压目标,监测技术的进步,对长期结果的调查,以及个性化方法的发展。通过巩固当前的知识并为未来的调查指明道路,这篇综述旨在帮助在动态的神经血管介入治疗领域持续提高患者的治疗效果.
    This comprehensive review delves into the intricate dynamics of cerebral perfusion and blood pressure management within the context of neurosurgical and endovascular aneurysm interventions. The review highlights the critical role of maintaining a delicate hemodynamic balance, given the brain\'s susceptibility to fluctuations in blood pressure. Emphasizing the regulatory mechanisms of cerebral perfusion, particularly autoregulation, the study advocates for a nuanced and personalized approach to blood pressure control. Key findings underscore the significance of adhering to tailored blood pressure targets to mitigate the risks of ischemic and hemorrhagic complications in both neurosurgical and endovascular procedures. The implications for clinical practice are profound, calling for heightened awareness and precision in hemodynamic management. The review concludes with recommendations for future research, urging exploration into optimal blood pressure targets, advancements in monitoring technologies, investigations into long-term outcomes, and the development of personalized approaches. By consolidating current knowledge and charting a path for future investigations, this review aims to contribute to the continual enhancement of patient outcomes in the dynamic field of neurovascular interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:术中低血压(IOH)与不良结局相关。因此,我们探讨了有关IOH的信念及其治疗障碍。其次,我们评估了教育干预和强制平均动脉压(MAP),或低血压预测指数软件(HPI)的实施与IOH的减少有关。
    方法:进行了结构化访谈(n=27)和问卷调查(n=84),以探索临床医生对IOH治疗的信念和障碍,除了HPI问卷的有用性(n=14)。150名需要进行有创血压监测的择期大手术患者被纳入三个队列,以评估低血压的发生率和时间加权平均值(TWA)(MAP<65mmHg)。队列1接受标准护理(基线),第2组的临床医生接受了低血压和强制MAP>65mmHg的培训,第三个队列的患者接受了使用HPI的原型治疗。
    结果:临床医生对某些患者的IOH管理感到挑战,然而他们报告了足够的知识和技能。HPI软件被认为是有用和有益的。队列之间的IOH发生率没有差异。TWA在基线和教育队列之间具有可比性(0.15mmHg[0.05-0.41]vs.0.11mmHg[0.02-0.37]),但在HPI队列中显著较低(0.04mmHg[0.00至0.11],与两者相比,p<0.05)。
    结论:临床医生认为他们有足够的知识和技能,这可以解释为什么在教育干预后没有发现差异。在HPI队列中,与基线相比,IOH显著降低,因此,HPI软件可能有助于预防IOH。
    背景:5月9日的ISRCTN17,085,700,2019.
    OBJECTIVE: Intraoperative hypotension (IOH) is associated with adverse outcomes. We therefore explored beliefs regarding IOH and barriers to its treatment. Secondarily, we assessed if an educational intervention and mandated mean arterial pressure (MAP), or the implementation of the Hypotension Prediction Index-software (HPI) were associated with a reduction in IOH.
    METHODS: Structured interviews (n = 27) and questionnaires (n = 84) were conducted to explore clinicians\' beliefs and barriers to IOH treatment, in addition to usefulness of HPI questionnaires (n = 14). 150 elective major surgical patients who required invasive blood pressure monitoring were included in three cohorts to assess incidence and time-weighted average (TWA) of hypotension (MAP < 65 mmHg). Cohort one received standard care (baseline), the clinicians of cohort two had a training on hypotension and a mandated MAP > 65 mmHg, and patients of the third cohort received protocolized care using the HPI.
    RESULTS: Clinicians felt challenged to manage IOH in some patients, yet they reported sufficient knowledge and skills. HPI-software was considered useful and beneficial. No difference was found in incidence of IOH between cohorts. TWA was comparable between baseline and education cohort (0.15 mmHg [0.05-0.41] vs. 0.11 mmHg [0.02-0.37]), but was significantly lower in the HPI cohort (0.04 mmHg [0.00 to 0.11], p < 0.05 compared to both).
    CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians believed they had sufficient knowledge and skills, which could explain why no difference was found after the educational intervention. In the HPI cohort, IOH was significantly reduced compared to baseline, therefore HPI-software may help prevent IOH.
    BACKGROUND: ISRCTN 17,085,700 on May 9th, 2019.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于癌症筛查和治疗的最新进展,许多癌症的存活率显著提高。虽然更好的癌症结果令人鼓舞,额外的健康挑战浮出水面,其中最大的是抗癌疗法的各种心血管和肾脏毒性所带来的负担。为了改善癌症患者的整体预后,了解和管理这些与治疗相关的不良反应至关重要.抗肿瘤疗法的心血管副作用是众所周知的,包括左心室功能障碍,心力衰竭,心肌缺血,QT延长,心律失常和高血压。其中,高血压是最常见的并发症,在大约40%的癌症患者中普遍存在,但却经常被忽视和被低估。这篇综述探讨了癌症和高血压之间的复杂联系,并提供了不同的诊断方法。监测和管理癌症患者的高血压。我们还概述了与接受具有高血压潜能的抗癌药物的患者护理相关的挑战和注意事项。
    The survival rates of many cancers have significantly improved due to recent advancements in cancer screening and therapeutics. Although better cancer outcomes are encouraging, additional health challenges have surfaced, the utmost of which is the burden imposed by various cardiovascular and renal toxicities of anticancer therapies. To improve the overall outcome of patients with cancer, it is essential to understand and manage these treatment-related adverse effects. The cardiovascular side effects of antineoplastic therapies are well-known and include left ventricular dysfunction, heart failure, myocardial ischaemia, QT prolongation, arrhythmia and hypertension. Among these, hypertension is the most common complication, prevalent in about 40% of all cancer patients, yet frequently overlooked and undertreated. This review explores the intricate connection between cancer and hypertension and provides distinct approaches to diagnosing, monitoring and managing hypertension in patients with cancer. We also outline the challenges and considerations that are relevant to the care of patients receiving anticancer drugs with prohypertensive potential.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    血压管理是患者护理的关键方面,特别是在外科和重症监护环境中。闭环系统,利用实时数据和反馈来调整治疗干预措施,因其增强血压控制的潜力而受到关注。本文就闭环系统在血压管理中的应用作一综述。我们讨论各种闭环方法,包括他们的机制,好处,和限制。通过利用实时患者数据和反馈,闭环系统可以动态定制干预措施,从而加强血压调节。此外,我们研究了闭环系统中先进监测技术和人工智能算法的集成。该评论重点介绍了最近的研究及其发现,强调在不同临床情景中闭环血压管理的不断发展。从围手术期到重症监护,闭环系统有可能通过响应持续的血压波动而精确调整血管加压药的给药,从而优化患者的治疗结果.通过深入了解血压控制闭环系统的当前状态,这篇综述全面概述了它们对改善患者结局的潜在贡献以及未来的研究和实施方向.
    Blood pressure management is a critical aspect of patient care, particularly in surgical and critical care settings. Closed-loop systems, which utilize real-time data and feedback to adjust treatment interventions, have gained attention for their potential to enhance blood pressure control. This review explores the application of closed-loop systems in blood pressure management. We discuss various closed-loop approaches, including their mechanisms, benefits, and limitations. By harnessing real-time patient data and feedback, closed-loop systems can tailor interventions dynamically, thus enhancing blood pressure regulation. Additionally, we examine the integration of advanced monitoring technologies and artificial intelligence algorithms in closed-loop systems. The review highlights recent studies and their findings, emphasizing the evolving landscape of closed-loop blood pressure management across different clinical scenarios. From the perioperative period to critical care settings, closed-loop systems hold the potential to optimize patient outcomes by precisely adjusting vasopressor administration in response to continuous blood pressure fluctuations. By providing insights into the current state of closed-loop systems for blood pressure control, this review offers a comprehensive overview of their potential contributions to improved patient outcomes and future directions for research and implementation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    大手术后并发症很常见,导致发病率和死亡率增加。局部脑氧饱和度(rScO2)反映了大脑和整体灌注,因此可用于指导血流动力学管理。我们旨在探讨rScO2指导的血压管理策略对接受大型非心脏手术的老年人术后主要并发症的影响。
    这项随机对照临床试验共纳入400名接受非心脏大手术和全身麻醉的老年患者。患者将被随机(1:1)分为两个血压管理组之一:一个标准护理组(目标平均动脉压>65mmHg或基线值的20%以内),和rScO2引导组(rScO2的绝对值>60%或rScO2降低<基线的10%)。主要结局是主要并发症的复合结局(包括感染性,呼吸,神经学,心血管,肾,血栓栓塞性胃肠道,和手术并发症)和术后前7天内的死亡。次要结局包括手术后第7天主要结局的各个组成部分和30天死亡率。将在修改后的意向治疗人群中分析数据。
    这项研究将为在接受大型非心脏手术的老年人中使用rScO2指导的血压管理改善术后结局提供证据。
    中国临床试验注册中心(标识符:ChiCTR2200060816)。
    这是一个前瞻性的协议,随机化,对照临床试验,以评估术中个体化局部脑氧饱和度(rScO2)优化在接受大型非心脏手术的老年人血压管理中的应用。该试验的主要重点是主要并发症的复合结局(包括传染性,呼吸,神经学,心血管,肾,血栓栓塞性胃肠道,和手术并发症)和术后前7天内的死亡。次要结局是手术后第7天主要结局的各个组成部分和30天死亡率。该试验的结果将为rScO2指导的血压管理提供临床证据,以改善计划进行大型非心脏手术的老年患者的术后预后。
    UNASSIGNED: Postoperative complications are common after major surgical procedures, leading to increased morbidity and mortality. Regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rScO2) reflects cerebral and global perfusion, and thus it can be used to guide hemodynamic management. We aim to explore the effect of rScO2-guided blood pressure management strategy on postoperative major complications in older adults who undergo major noncardiac surgery.
    UNASSIGNED: This randomized controlled clinical trial includes a total of 400 elderly patients receiving major noncardiac surgery and general anesthesia. Patients will be randomized (1:1) to one of two blood pressure management groups: a standard care group (targeting mean arterial pressure >65 mmHg or within 20% of baseline value), and a rScO2-guided group (absolute value of rScO2 >60% or decrease in rScO2 <10% of baseline). The primary outcome is the composite outcome of major complications (including infectious, respiratory, neurologic, cardiovascular, renal, thromboembolic gastrointestinal, and surgical complications) and deaths within the first 7 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes include the individual components of the primary outcome by day 7 after surgery and 30-day mortality. Data will be analyzed in the modified intention-to-treat population.
    UNASSIGNED: This study will provide evidence for improving postoperative outcomes using the rScO2-guided blood pressure management among older adults who undergo major noncardiac surgery.
    UNASSIGNED: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Identifier: ChiCTR2200060816).
    This is a protocol for a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial to evaluate the use of intraoperative individualized regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rScO2) optimization for blood pressure management in older adults undergoing major noncardiac surgery. The primary focus of this trial is the composite outcome of major complications (including infectious, respiratory, neurologic, cardiovascular, renal, thromboembolic gastrointestinal, and surgical complications) and deaths within the first 7 days after surgery. The secondary outcomes are the individual components of the primary outcome by day 7 after surgery and 30-day mortality. The findings of this trial will provide clinical evidence for the rScO2-guided blood pressure management to improve postoperative outcomes in older patients who are scheduled for major noncardiac surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号