antimicrobial consumption

抗菌药物消费
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    根据卫生部抗菌素耐药性监测计划的2017-2020年度报告,已经观察到常见致病病原体的显著耐药模式。在医院环境中,已经实施了抗菌药物管理计划,以优化抗菌药物的使用。药物利用审查研究提供了必要的反馈,以改善药物的处方和使用。
    本研究旨在回顾2019年1月至12月收治的患者中监测的肠胃外抗菌药物的药物利用情况。
    这项研究采用了回顾性研究,横截面,描述性研究设计。对给予患者的药物进行回顾性图表审查。
    共有821例患者符合纳入标准。患者年龄在18至98岁之间,52%为女性。普通内科医师(28%)是主要用于中等风险社区获得性肺炎管理的监测肠胃外抗菌药物的主要处方(39%)。他们主要用于经验性治疗感染(94%),平均给予5.73天。在所有病例中,只有58%的病例有培养和敏感性测试的订单。其中,主要有47%的人有殖民地文化。血液(29%)和痰(27%)是最常见的标本,用于培养和敏感性测试。经常分离的微生物是大肠杆菌(19%),肺炎克雷伯菌(18%),和金黄色葡萄球菌(9%)。此外,还分离了产超广谱β内酰胺酶的革兰氏阴性病原体(4%)和耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(1%).所有分离出的微生物对氨苄青霉素的耐药性最高(81%),对粘菌素的敏感性最高(100%)。遇到了与药物治疗相关的问题。有1例药物不良反应(0.1%)和2例禁忌症(0.2%)。在5%的病例中也观察到治疗重复。此外,39%有药物-药物相互作用。在监测的肠胃外抗菌药物中,哌拉西林-他唑巴坦的消费量最高(79.50定义的每日剂量/1,000名患者天)。一些处方在评估时被认为是不合适的。根据正当性指标,12%的案件是不适当的。至于关键指标,治疗持续时间(78%)是主要原因。只有DUE标准指标的四个组成部分达到或超过了既定的阈值水平。成本分析表明,使用监测的肠胃外抗菌药物治疗的实际总费用为17,645,601.73比索。考虑到卫生部国家抗生素指南的建议,理想的治疗总费用为14,917,214.29。去年2019年收治的患者可能实现了2,728,387.44的潜在累计成本节省。
    哌拉西林-他唑巴坦的消耗量与本研究涵盖的其他监测的肠胃外抗菌药物相比相对较高。研究地点的医生很少按照国家抗生素指南的建议开出监测的肠胃外抗菌药物。这在不适当的治疗方案的发生率上得到了证明,以不恰当的治疗持续时间为主要解释。从病人的角度来看,主要的经济影响是直接医疗费用,特别是用于管理各种感染的实际抗菌疗法的成本增加。医生坚持既定的指南和选择最具成本效益的治疗方法可能会节省大量的成本。
    UNASSIGNED: Based on the 2017-2020 annual report of the Department of Health-Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Program, significant resistance patterns have been observed for common disease-causing pathogens. In the hospital setting, antimicrobial stewardship programs have been implemented to optimize the use of antimicrobials. Drug utilization review studies provide essential feedback to improve prescribing and use of medications.
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to review drug utilization of monitored parenteral antimicrobials among patients admitted from January to December 2019.
    UNASSIGNED: The study employed a retrospective, cross-sectional, descriptive research design. A retrospective chart review of drugs administered to patients was conducted.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 821 patients charts met the inclusion criteria. The patients\' ages ranged from 18 to 98 years old and 52% were females. General Internal Medicine practitioners (28%) were the top prescribers of monitored parenteral antimicrobials primarily for the management of moderate-risk community-acquired pneumonia (39%). They were mostly indicated for empirical treatment of infections (94%) and were given for an average of 5.73 days.Only 58% of the total cases had orders for culture and sensitivity testing. Of which, principally 47% had colony cultures. Blood (29%) and sputum (27%) were the most common specimens taken for culture and sensitivity testing. The microorganisms often isolated were Escherichia coli (19%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (18%), and Staphylococcus aureus (9%). In addition, extended-spectrum beta lactamase-producing gram-negative pathogens (4%) and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (1%) were also isolated. All the microorganisms isolated showed most resistance to ampicillin (81%) and most susceptibility to colistin (100%). There were drug therapy-related problems encountered. There was one case of an adverse drug reaction (0.1%) and two cases of contraindications (0.2%). Therapeutic duplication was also observed in 5% of the cases. Moreover, 39% had instances of drug-drug interactions.Piperacillin-tazobactam had the highest consumption (79.50 defined daily doses/1,000-patient days) among the monitored parenteral antimicrobials.Some prescriptions were deemed inappropriate upon evaluation. 12% of cases were inappropriate based on the justification indicator. As for the critical indicators, duration of therapy (78%) was the main reason. Only four components of the DUE criteria indicators have met or exceeded the established threshold level.The cost analysis indicated that the total actual cost of therapy with the monitored parenteral antimicrobials amounted to ₱17,645,601.73. Considering Department of Health National Antibiotic Guidelines recommendations, ideal total cost of treatment was ₱14,917,214.29. Potential cumulative cost savings of ₱2,728,387.44 could have been achieved for patients admitted last 2019.
    UNASSIGNED: Consumption of piperacillin-tazobactam was relatively high as compared to the other monitored parenteral antimicrobials covered in this study. Physicians at the study site seldom prescribe monitored parenteral antimicrobials as recommended by the National Antibiotic Guidelines. This is evidenced in the incidence of inappropriate therapy regimens, with inapt duration of therapy as the leading explanation.From the patient\'s perspective, the main economic implication was on the direct medical costs, particularly the increased cost of the actual antimicrobial therapy prescribed to manage various infections. Adherence of physicians to the established guidelines and selection of the most cost-effective therapy could have resulted in considerable cost savings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本文的目的是探索和评估各种策略,用于监测动物的抗菌药物消耗(AMC),在“一个健康”方法的背景下。最近的研究揭示了动物中AMC的有限监测和数据收集。使用美国疾病预防控制中心政策分析框架,我们评估全球,国家,以及使用初级证据对公共卫生影响和可行性的农场一级监测策略,次要,灰色文学由此,我们确定了支持采用监测的关键政策机制,同时提供具体建议。我们发现一项全球战略,虽然对基准和政策指导很有价值,面临参与和数据可见性挑战。国家一级的监测为国家行动计划提供了直接投入,但在数据一致性和可比性方面存在困难。农场一级的监视,虽然资源密集型,提供最精细的数据,以告知具体的干预措施。我们主张对AMC监测采取多方面的方法,强调法律授权和财政激励措施对于鼓励监督参与至关重要,以及提高参与度和数据质量的国际合作。与其他部门的公共报告挑战相提并论,可以为如何解决数据收集提供宝贵的经验教训,分析,报告障碍。
    The aim of this paper is to explore and assess various strategies for monitoring antimicrobial consumption (AMC) in animals, within the context of the One Health approach. Recent studies have shed light on the limited surveillance and data collection for AMC in animals. Using the United States Center for Disease Control and Prevention Policy Analytical Framework, we assess global, national, and farm-level surveillance strategies on public health impact and feasibility using evidence from primary, secondary, and grey literature. From this, we identify key policy mechanisms that support the adoption of surveillance while providing specific recommendations. We find that a global strategy, though valuable for benchmarking and policy guidance, faces participation and data visibility challenges. National-level surveillance offers direct inputs into national action plans but struggles with data uniformity and comparability. Farm-level surveillance, while resource-intensive, provides the most granular data for informing specific interventions. We advocate for a multi-faceted approach to AMC surveillance, emphasizing that legal mandates and financial incentives are crucial for encouraging surveillance participation, along with international cooperation for enhancing participation and data quality. Drawing parallels with public reporting challenges in other sectors can provide valuable lessons on how to address data collection, analysis, and reporting barriers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:信息系统的数字化允许自动测量抗菌剂的消耗量(AMC),在不影响患者安全的情况下,帮助解决因不适当药物使用而产生的抗生素耐药性。
    目的:描述并描述一种用于重症监护病房(ICU)的新的自动AMC监视服务,根据转诊诊所的数据进行分层,并与个体患者的危险因素相关联,疾病严重程度,和死亡率。
    方法:开发了一种从电子病历中收集数据的自动化服务,已实施,并在瑞典北部的医疗保健地区进行了验证。我们从2018年1月1日至2021年12月31日进行了一项观察性研究,包括对所有≥18岁的人群的一般ICU护理,在二级护理和三级护理的流域人口分别为270000和900000。我们使用描述性分析将ICU人群特征与AMC结果随着时间的推移联系起来,包括治疗天数(DOT),治疗的长度,定义的每日剂量,和死亡率。
    结果:5190例患者中,有5608例入院,中位年龄为65岁(IQR48-75),女性占41.2%。30天死亡率为18.3%。总AMC为1177个DOT,二级和1261个DOT,每1000个患者天和三级护理。AMC在转诊诊所之间差异很大,在接受三级护理的810例普外科手术中,每1000例患者天1486例DOT的总入院人数最高。在COVID-19波期间,病例混合对AMC的影响很明显,这突出了需要考虑病例混合。暴露于三种以上抗菌药物类别(N=242)的患者30天死亡率为40.6%,根据入院分数,他们的预期比率存在显著差异。
    结论:我们引入了一项新的服务和说明,用于自动化本地ICU-AMC数据收集。提出了通用的长期ICU-AMC指标,涵盖患者因素,转诊诊所和死亡率结果,有望有利于完善抗菌药物的使用。
    BACKGROUND: The digitalization of information systems allows automatic measurement of antimicrobial consumption (AMC), helping address antibiotic resistance from inappropriate drug use without compromising patient safety.
    OBJECTIVE: Describe and characterize a new automated AMC surveillance service for intensive care units (ICUs), with data stratified by referral clinic and linked with individual patient risk factors, disease severity, and mortality.
    METHODS: An automated service collecting data from the electronic medical record was developed, implemented, and validated in a healthcare region in northern Sweden. We performed an observational study from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2021, encompassing general ICU care for all ≥18-years-olds in a catchment population of 270000 in secondary care and 900000 in tertiary care. We used descriptive analyses to associate ICU population characteristics with AMC outcomes over time, including days of therapy (DOT), length of therapy, defined daily doses, and mortality.
    RESULTS: There were 5608 admissions among 5190 patients with a median age of 65 (IQR 48-75) years, 41.2% females. The 30-day mortality was 18.3%. Total AMC was 1177 DOTs in secondary and 1261 DOTs per 1000 patient days and tertiary care. AMC varied significantly among referral clinics, with the highest total among 810 general surgery admissions in tertiary care at 1486 DOTs per 1000 patient days. Case-mix effects on the AMC were apparent during COVID-19 waves highlighting the need to account for case-mix. Patients exposed to more than three antimicrobial drug classes (N = 242) had a 30-day mortality rate of 40.6%, with significant variability in their expected rates based on admission scores.
    CONCLUSIONS: We introduce a new service and instructions for automating local ICU-AMC data collection. The versatile long-term ICU-AMC metrics presented, covering patient factors, referral clinics and mortality outcomes, are expected to be beneficial in refining antimicrobial drug use.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在医疗保健中引入了抗菌药物管理计划(ASP)作为公共卫生优先事项,以促进适当的抗菌药物处方,为了减少与抗菌药物相关的不良事件,以及控制不断升级的抗菌素耐药性挑战。为了实现有针对性的成果目标,ASP涉及多个相关的实施过程措施。对ASPs的两个概念进行了系统评价。在PRISMA框架的指导下,在过去的10年中,我们对所有年龄组的发表的系统评价(SR)进行了评估,重点是仅限于二级和三级医疗保健的ASP。在265项确定的SR研究中,63符合纳入标准。大部分在欧洲和北美进行,来自其他地区的有限研究。在审查的研究中,所有年龄组都进行了检查,尽管与儿童和婴儿相比,它们主要针对成人进行。通过25个不同的概念,同时对ASP的过程和结果度量进行了平等和同时的检查,以功效为主导,抗菌素耐药性,和经济影响,同时对信息技术以及药学和行为因素的作用进行了同样的研究。审查的主要结论是,在全球范围内,ASP证明了有效性,证明了疗效,和确认的效率,尽管重点评估主张发达国家应以中小型医院为目标,而发展中国家应继续在医疗保健设施中滚动ASP。此外,ASP的未来应该专注于拥抱不断发展的信息技术,以弥合知识差距,技能,和态度,以及加强适当的决策。
    Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASP) were introduced in healthcare as a public health priority to promote appropriate prescribing of antimicrobials, to reduce adverse events related to antimicrobials, as well as to control the escalating challenges of antimicrobial resistance. To deliver aimed outcome objectives, ASPs involve multiple connected implementation process measures. A systematic review was conducted to evaluate both concepts of ASPs. Guided by PRISMA frames, published systematic reviews (SR) focusing on ASPs restricted to secondary and tertiary healthcare were evaluated over the past 10 years involving all age groups. Out of 265 identified SR studies, 63 met the inclusion criteria. The majority were conducted in Europe and North America, with limited studies from other regions. In the reviewed studies, all age groups were examined, although they were conducted mainly on adults when compared to children and infants. Both process and outcomes measures of ASPs were examined equally and simultaneously through 25 different concepts, dominated by efficacy, antimicrobial resistance, and economic impact, while information technology as well as role of pharmacy and behavioral factors were equally examined. The main broad conclusions from the review were that, across the globe, ASPs demonstrated effectiveness, proved efficacy, and confirmed efficiency, while focused evaluation advocated that developed countries should target medium- and small-sized hospitals while developing countries should continue rolling ASPs across healthcare facilities. Additionally, the future of ASPs should focus on embracing evolving information technology to bridge the gaps in knowledge, skills, and attitude, as well as to enhance appropriate decision making.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的目的是比较同一医院的两个独立的重症监护病房(ICU)的抗菌药物耐药率及其与抗生素消耗的关系,一个与其他没有选择性净化消化道(SDD)。
    方法:我们在阿拉巴大学医院的两个ICU中进行了一项回顾性研究。创伤和神经外科患者被送往SDD-ICU,和一般消化外科患者去没有SDD-ICU。从2014年到2018年,我们分析了分离株的数量,和47种抗菌微生物组合的细菌耐药性趋势。此外,估计两个ICU的抗菌药物消费量。还将耐药率与ENVIN-HELICS西班牙国家注册报告的耐药率进行了比较。
    结果:在使用SDD协议的ICU中,大肠杆菌对阿莫西林/克拉维酸的耐药性以及粪肠球菌对高浓度庆大霉素和高浓度链霉素的耐药性均显著下降。在没有SDD-ICU的患者中,凝固葡萄球菌阴性(CoNS)对利奈唑胺的耐药性也显着增加。总的来说,SDD-ICU的耐药水平低于无SDD的ICU或低于西班牙国家登记处报告的ICU.
    结论:SDD对耐药性的出现和传播没有临床相关影响,在整体全身抗菌药物使用中也是如此。患者类型而不是SDD协议显示条件的生态,因此,ICU中的阻力率。
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to to compare the antimicrobial resistance rate and its relationship with the antibiotic consumption in two separate Intensive Care Units (ICUs) of the same hospital, one with and other without selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD).
    METHODS: We performed a retrospective study in the two ICUs of the Araba University Hospital. Trauma and neurosurgical patients are admitted to the SDD-ICU, and general digestive surgery patients go to the no SDD-ICU. From 2014 to 2018 we analyzed the number of isolates, and the bacterial resistance trends of 47 antimicrobial-microorganism combinations. Additionally, antimicrobial consumption was estimated in both ICUs. Resistance rates were also compared with those reported in ENVIN-HELICS Spanish national registry.
    RESULTS: In the ICU with SDD protocol, there was a significant decrease in the resistance of E. coli to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and in the resistance of E. faecalis to high concentration of gentamycin and high concentration of streptomycin. A significant increase of resistance of Staphylococcus coagulasa negative (CoNS) to linezolid in the no SDD-ICU was also detected. Overall, the level of resistance in the SDD-ICU was lower or of the same order than in the ICU without SDD and that reported in the Spanish national registry.
    CONCLUSIONS: SDD had neither a clinically relevant impact on emergence and spread of resistance, nor in the overall systemic antimicrobial use. The patient type rather than the SDD protocol showed to condition the ecology and therefore, the resistance rate in the ICUs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    关于抗菌素消费综合分析(AMC)和人类和食用动物细菌耐药性(AMR)的第四份机构间联合报告(JIACRA)涉及机构获得的数据。该分析还试图确定AMR和AMC在2014-2021年期间是否存在显著趋势。人类和动物部门的AMC,以估计生物量的mg/kg表示,在国家和欧洲层面进行了比较。2021年,AMC的总生物量为125.0mg/kg(28个欧盟/欧洲经济区国家,范围为44.3-160.1)和92.6mg/kg的食用动物生物量(29个欧盟/欧洲经济区国家,范围2.5-296.5)。在2014年至2021年之间,食用动物的总AMC下降了44%,而在人类中,它保持相对稳定。进行单变量和多变量分析以研究AMC和AMR之间对于细菌和抗微生物剂的选择组合的关联。观察到某些抗微生物剂的消耗与人类和食品生产动物的细菌对这些物质的抗性之间存在正相关。对于某些细菌和抗菌剂的组合,人类细菌中的AMR与食用动物细菌中的AMR相关,反过来,与动物的AMC有关。这些关联的相对强度在抗菌类别之间明显不同,微生物和部门。对于某些抗菌药物,在2014-2021年期间,一些国家的食品生产动物和人类的AMC和AMR呈统计学显著下降趋势.同样,显着降低总AMC的国家比例也表明,来自食品生产动物的指示性大肠杆菌和源自人类侵入性感染的大肠杆菌对抗菌药物的敏感性增加(即,对一组统一的抗菌剂表现出“完全敏感性”或“零抗性”)。总的来说,研究结果表明,在许多国家,为减少食品生产动物和人类的AMC而采取的措施是有效的。然而,这些措施需要加强,以便保留并进一步继续减少AMC,在必要的地方。这也突出了促进人类和动物健康的措施的重要性,如疫苗接种和更好的卫生,从而减少使用抗微生物剂的需要。
    The fourth joint inter-agency report on integrated analysis of antimicrobial consumption (AMC) and the occurrence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in bacteria from humans and food-producing animals (JIACRA) addressed data obtained by the Agencies\' EU-wide surveillance networks for 2019-2021. The analysis also sought to identify whether significant trends in AMR and AMC were concomitant over 2014-2021. AMC in both human and animal sectors, expressed in mg/kg of estimated biomass, was compared at country and European level. In 2021, the total AMC was assessed at 125.0 mg/kg of biomass for humans (28 EU/EEA countries, range 44.3-160.1) and 92.6 mg/kg of biomass for food-producing animals (29 EU/EEA countries, range 2.5-296.5). Between 2014 and 2021, total AMC in food-producing animals decreased by 44%, while in humans, it remained relatively stable. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to study associations between AMC and AMR for selected combinations of bacteria and antimicrobials. Positive associations between consumption of certain antimicrobials and resistance to those substances in bacteria from both humans and food-producing animals were observed. For certain combinations of bacteria and antimicrobials, AMR in bacteria from humans was associated with AMR in bacteria from food-producing animals which, in turn, was related to AMC in animals. The relative strength of these associations differed markedly between antimicrobial class, microorganism and sector. For certain antimicrobials, statistically significant decreasing trends in AMC and AMR were concomitant for food-producing animals and humans in several countries over 2014-2021. Similarly, a proportion of countries that significantly reduced total AMC also registered increasing susceptibility to antimicrobials in indicator E. coli from food-producing animals and E. coli originating from human invasive infections (i.e., exhibited \'complete susceptibility\' or \'zero resistance\' to a harmonised set of antimicrobials). Overall, the findings suggest that measures implemented to reduce AMC in food-producing animals and in humans have been effective in many countries. Nevertheless, these measures need to be reinforced so that reductions in AMC are retained and further continued, where necessary. This also highlights the importance of measures that promote human and animal health, such as vaccination and better hygiene, thereby reducing the need for use of antimicrobials.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:已提出将抗菌药物管理计划(ASP)作为优化抗真菌药物使用的机会。抗真菌耐药性是一个重要的和新出现的威胁。关于抗真菌管理(AFS)及其对性能和临床结果指标的影响的文献很少。本研究旨在研究AFS对患者和绩效指标影响的全球证据。
    方法:“系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目”(PRISMA)用于鉴定流程,筛选,资格,和包容。于2023年2月15日使用术语\'\'抗真菌管理\'\'搜索PubMed和MEDLINE。搜索词包括抗真菌管理,抗菌药物管理,念珠菌,念珠菌病,念珠菌,和侵袭性真菌病。在1366条记录中,由于他们没有描述抗真菌管理干预措施,因此删除了1304。在评估的62个全文中,21篇文章被排除在外,因为它们是非干预性研究,不包括感兴趣的结果。因此,41篇有资格进行系统评价。符合条件的研究是描述AFS计划并评估临床或性能测量的研究。
    结果:在纳入的41项研究中,收集的主要性能测量是抗真菌药物的消耗(41个中的22个),和死亡率(41个中的22个),其次是住院时间(41人中的11人)和费用(41人中的9人)。大多数研究是单中心的,准实验,不同的干预措施。本系统评价中大多数研究的主要发现是以不同单位表示的死亡率降低和抗真菌药物的使用(22项报告死亡率中的13项研究)。开始管理后,抗真菌药物的消耗显着减弱或减少(22个中的10个)。由于缺乏标准单位,比较研究是不可能的,使得进行荟萃分析不可行,这将限制我们的研究。
    结论:已经表明,AFS干预措施可以改善抗真菌药物的消耗和其他性能指标。根据现有的已发表的研究,抗真菌药物消耗和死亡率似乎是评估AFS影响的可能性能指标。
    BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) have been proposed as an opportunity to optimize antifungal use. The antifungal resistance is a significant and emerging threat. The literature on antifungal stewardship (AFS) and its influence on performance and clinical outcome measures is scarce. This study aimed to examine global evidence of the impact of AFS on patients and performance measures.
    METHODS: The \"Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses\" (PRISMA) was used for the flow of identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion. PubMed and MEDLINE were searched using the term \'\'antifungal stewardship\'\' on 15 February 2023. Search terms included antifungal stewardship, antimicrobial stewardship, candida, candidemia, candiduria, and invasive fungal disease. Of the 1366 records, 1304 were removed since they did not describe an antifungal stewardship intervention. Among the 62 full texts assessed, 21 articles were excluded since they were non-interventional studies and did not include the outcome of interest. Thus, 41 articles were eligible for systematic review. Eligible studies were those that described an AFS program and evaluated clinical or performance measures.
    RESULTS: Of the 41 included studies, the primary performance measure collected was antifungal consumption (22 of 41), and mortality (22 of 41), followed by length of stay (11 of 41) and cost (9 of 41). Most studies were single-center, quasi-experimental, with varying interventions across studies. The principal finding from most of the studies in this systematic review is a reduction in mortality expressed in different units and the use of antifungal agents (13 studies out of 22 reporting mortality). Antifungal consumption was significantly blunted or reduced following stewardship initiation (10 of 22). Comparing studies was impossible due to a lack of standard units, making conducting a meta-analysis unfeasible, which would be a limitation of our study.
    CONCLUSIONS: It has been shown that AFS interventions may improve antifungal consumption and other performance measures. According to available published studies, antifungal consumption and mortality appear to be the possible performance measures to evaluate the impact of AFS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:关于快速微生物测试对抗菌素消耗(AC)和抗菌素耐药模式(ARPs)的益处的数据很少。我们评估了基于快速技术的协议对重症监护(ICU)患者的AC和ARP的影响。
    方法:在ICU患者中进行了一项回顾性的干预前(2018年)和干预后(2019-2021年)研究。从2019年开始,一种快速诊断算法应用于下呼吸道感染患者。医院感染的发生率,ARPS,和AC作为DDDs(定义的每日剂量)进行监测。
    结果:共纳入3635例患者:干预前987例,干预后2648例。中位年龄为60岁,样本是64%的男性,APACHEⅡ和SOFA平均得分为19分和3分。ICU总死亡率为17.2%,组间无差异。在干预后观察到感染数量增加(44.5%vs.17.9%,p<0.01),特别是由于呼吸机相关性肺炎的发病率增加(44.6%vs.25%,p<0.001)。AC从2018年的128.7DDD下降到2021年的66.0DDD(比率=0.51)。观察到铜绿假单胞菌对哌拉西林/他唑巴坦的敏感性增加了23%,对美罗培南的敏感性增加了31%。
    结论:基于快速微生物诊断技术的算法的实施可以显着减少AC和ARPs,而不会影响危重患者的预后。
    BACKGROUND: Data on the benefits of rapid microbiological testing on antimicrobial consumption (AC) and antimicrobial resistance patterns (ARPs) are scarce. We evaluated the impact of a protocol based on rapid techniques on AC and ARP in intensive care (ICU) patients.
    METHODS: A retrospective pre- (2018) and post-intervention (2019-2021) study was conducted in ICU patients. A rapid diagnostic algorithm was applied starting in 2019 in patients with a lower respiratory tract infection. The incidence of nosocomial infections, ARPs, and AC as DDDs (defined daily doses) were monitored.
    RESULTS: A total of 3635 patients were included: 987 in the pre-intervention group and 2648 in the post-intervention group. The median age was 60 years, the sample was 64% male, and the average APACHE II and SOFA scores were 19 points and 3 points. The overall ICU mortality was 17.2% without any differences between the groups. An increase in the number of infections was observed in the post-intervention group (44.5% vs. 17.9%, p < 0.01), especially due to an increase in the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (44.6% vs. 25%, p < 0.001). AC decreased from 128.7 DDD in 2018 to 66.0 DDD in 2021 (rate ratio = 0.51). An increase in Pseudomonas aeruginosa susceptibility of 23% for Piperacillin/tazobactam and 31% for Meropenem was observed.
    CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of an algorithm based on rapid microbiological diagnostic techniques allowed for a significant reduction in AC and ARPs without affecting the prognosis of critically ill patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们观察到,在2019年至2020年期间,欧盟/欧洲经济区社区部门的系统性抗菌药物(ATCJ01)消费量有所反弹。2022年的发病率恢复到COVID-19大流行前的水平,并在13个国家超过了这一水平。尽管这些模式可能部分是研究期间疾病传播变化的结果,这也可能反映出失去了加强和加强谨慎使用抗生素的机会。
    We observed a rebound in consumption of antibacterials for systemic use (ATC J01) in the community sector in the European Union/European Economic Area during 2021 and 2022, after an observed decrease between 2019 and 2020. The rates in 2022 returned to pre-COVID-19-pandemic levels and were exceeded in 13 countries. Although these patterns could partly be a result of changes in disease transmission during the study period, it could also reflect a lost opportunity to strengthen and reinforce prudent antibiotic use.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号