The purpose of this study was to use models of spine to compare range of motion and intradiscal pressure of adjacent segments performing anterior and/or posterior lumbar surgical approaches and predict potential risk of adjacent segment degeneration. A previously validated finite element model of the intact L1-S1 segments was used. Three different anterior and one posterior surgical fixation approaches for tuberculosis were performed in L3-L5. Three different anterior surgical models were constructed according to the anterior approaches involving debridement, bone graft with or without titanium mesh, and internal fixation with different number of screws and rods. The posterior surgical approach involved transforaminal lumbar interbody debridement, bone graft, and internal fixation. Range of motion and intradiscal pressure of segments adjacent to the fusion were assessed, and biomechanical influences were compared. Intradiscal pressure and range of motion of the adjacent L2/3 and L5/S1 increased during different physiological movements after anterior and/or posterior surgical approaches as compared to baseline values. Comparison between the biomechanical values assessed after different anterior surgical approaches yielded no significant difference. After anterior and posterior surgical approaches were performed on the same model, there were no significant differences in intradiscal pressure and range of motion of the adjacent L2/3 and L5/S1. Anterior and/or posterior lumbar surgical approaches increased range of motion and intradiscal pressure in L2/3 and L5/S1, suggesting each lumbar surgical approach assessed has the potential risk of adjacent segment degeneration. However, there were no significant differences between the biomechanical measurements across the different surgical approaches evaluated.

UNASSIGNED: There is minimal literature discussing anterior lumbar spine surgery in ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs). The main concern with the anterior approach to the lumbar spine is the potential for injury to great vessels. In our facility, there are two units of crossmatched blood available in addition to cell saver during the procedure. We retrospectively looked at 50 cases of lumbar total disc arthroplasty (TDA) in our ASC to determine utilization of blood products.
UNASSIGNED: Medical records of 50 consecutive patients who underwent a lumbar TDA at a single ASC were reviewed. Surgeries completed at the ASC were all transferred from the post anesthesia care unit to an attached convalescence care center which allows up to 3 days of observation. Patients who had either a 1 or 2 level lumbar TDA were included in the study. Data consisting of demographics, American Society of Anesthesiologist Physical Status Classification System, length of stay, estimated blood loss, cell saver volume, transfusion, perioperative and postoperative complications were recorded. Preoperative, perioperative and postoperative medical records were reviewed.
UNASSIGNED: Medical records of 50 consecutive patients were reviewed. The mean age was 40.86 ± 9.45. Of these, 48 (96%) had a 1-level lumbar TDA, 1(2%) had a 2-level lumbar TDA, 1 (2%) had a lumbar TDA at L4/5 and an anterior lumbar interbody fusion at L5/S1. There were no mortalities; no patient had recorded perioperative complications. No patients received allogeneic blood transfusion, 4 (8%) were re-transfused with cell saver (2 receiving approximately 400 ml and 2 receiving approximately 200 ml of re-transfused blood). All 50 (100%) were discharged home in stable condition. We had 30-day follow-up data on 35 of 50 patients. Of the 35 patients reviewed, three (8.5%) of the patients were readmitted to the hospital. One additional patient was seen in the emergency department and discharged home after negative testing. No patient was readmitted for post-operative anemia.
UNASSIGNED: The routine use of both cell saver and crossmatched blood in the operating suite for lumbar TDA may be an over-utilization of healthcare resources. In our review of 50 patients, we had no need for transfusion of allogeneic packed red blood cells (PRBCs) and only four of the 50 patients had enough blood output for re-transfusion from the cell saver. This opens the conversation for alternatives to crossmatched PRBCs being held in the operating room. Such alternatives may be the use of cell salvage, only type O blood in a cooler for each patient or keeping type O blood on constant hold in ASCs.