anesthesia type

麻醉类型
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本前瞻性随机研究旨在研究老年人术后认知功能下降(POCD)的发展是否与麻醉类型有关。所有患者均进行谵妄和精神状态筛查,接受基线神经心理学评估,和日常生活活动(ADL)的评估。在3-6个月和12-18个月进行随访评估。患者随机接受异氟醚吸入麻醉(ISO)或异丙酚全静脉麻醉(TIVA)维持麻醉。ISO(n=99)和TIVA(n=100)组在人口统计上相似,术前认知,术后谵妄的发生率。从基线到随访,各组在记忆或执行功能的平均变化方面没有差异。术前认知功能是预测POCD发展的唯一变量。麻醉类型不能预测POCD。然而,ADLs可预测术后谵妄的发展。总的来说,这项试点研究代表了一个前瞻性的,随机研究表明,在检查ISO和TIVA以维持全身麻醉时,麻醉类型之间的认知没有显着差异。术后谵妄的发生也没有差异。术后认知下降最好通过较低的基线认知和功能状态来预测。
    The present prospective randomized study was designed to investigate whether the development of Post Operative Cognitive Decline (POCD) is related to anesthesia type in older adults. All patients were screened for delirium and mental status, received baseline neuropsychological assessment, and evaluation of activities of daily living (ADLs). Follow-up assessments were performed at 3-6 months and 12-18 months. Patients were randomized to receive either inhalation anesthesia (ISO) with isoflurane or total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol for maintenance anesthesia. ISO (n = 99) and TIVA (n = 100) groups were similar in demographics, preoperative cognition, and incidence of post-operative delirium. Groups did not differ in terms of mean change in memory or executive function from baseline to follow-up. Pre-surgical cognitive function is the only variable predictive of the development of POCD. Anesthetic type was not predictive of POCD. However, ADLs were predictive of post-operative delirium development. Overall, this pilot study represents a prospective, randomized study demonstrating that when examining ISO versus TIVA for maintenance of general anesthesia, there is no significant difference in cognition between anesthetic types. There is also no difference in the occurrence of postoperative delirium. Postoperative cognitive decline was best predicted by lower baseline cognition and functional status.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED:全身麻醉传统上用于经导管主动脉瓣置换术;然而,人们对替代麻醉技术的兴趣和势头越来越大。
    UNASSIGNED:为了对美国经导管主动脉瓣置换术中的麻醉管理选择进行描述性研究,比较监测麻醉护理与全身麻醉的使用趋势。
    UNASSIGNED:数据来自美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)麻醉质量研究所的国家麻醉临床结果注册。
    UNASSIGNED:使用多变量逻辑回归来确定与全身麻醉相比使用监测麻醉护理相关的预测因素。
    UNASSIGNED:监测麻醉护理的使用已从2013年的1.8%增加到2017年的25.2%(p=0.0001)。患者年龄在80岁以上(66%vs.61%;p=0.0001),男性(54%vs.52%;p=0.0001),ASA身体状况>III(86%vs.80%;p=0.0001),在东北部得到照顾(38%与22%;p=0.0001),和邮政编码中值收入较高的居民(63,382美元与55,311美元;p=0.0001)。多变量分析显示,年龄每增加一年,每年在一次实践中执行的每50个程序,男性与3%相关(p=0.0001),33%(p=0.012),和16%(p=0.026)增加监测麻醉护理的几率,分别。东北地区的中心更有可能使用监测麻醉护理(所有p<0.005)。除了经皮股动脉以外,接受其他方法的患者不太可能接受监测的麻醉护理(调整后的比值比均<0.51;均p=0.0001)。
    UNASSIGNED:美国经导管主动脉瓣置换术的麻醉类型随年龄而变化,性别,地理,在中心执行的案件量,和程序方法。
    General anesthesia has traditionally been used in transcatheter aortic valve replacement; however, there has been increasing interest and momentum in alternative anesthetic techniques.
    To perform a descriptive study of anesthetic management options in transcatheter aortic valve replacements in the United States, comparing trends in use of monitored anesthesia care versus general anesthesia.
    Data evaluated from the American Society of Anesthesiologists\' (ASA) Anesthesia Quality Institute\'s National Anesthesia Clinical Outcomes Registry.
    Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors associated with use of monitored anesthesia care compared to general anesthesia.
    The use of monitored anesthesia care has increased from 1.8% of cases in 2013 to 25.2% in 2017 (p = 0.0001). Patients were more likely ages 80+ (66% vs. 61%; p = 0.0001), male (54% vs. 52%; p = 0.0001), ASA physical status > III (86% vs. 80%; p = 0.0001), cared for in the Northeast (38% vs. 22%; p = 0.0001), and residents in zip codes with higher median income ($63,382 vs. $55,311; p = 0.0001). Multivariable analysis revealed each one-year increase in age, every 50 procedures performed annually at a practice, and being male were associated with 3% (p = 0.0001), 33% (p = 0.012), and 16% (p = 0.026) increased odds of monitored anesthesia care, respectively. Centers in the Northeast were more likely to use monitored anesthesia care (all p < 0.005). Patients who underwent approaches other than percutaneous femoral arterial were less likely to receive monitored anesthesia care (adjusted odds ratios all < 0.51; all p = 0.0001).
    Anesthetic type for transcatheter aortic valve replacements in the United States varies with age, sex, geography, volume of cases performed at a center, and procedural approach.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:我们试图评估动静脉通路创建中使用的主要麻醉剂类型的差异,假设区域麻醉和以局部麻醉作为主要麻醉剂的监测麻醉护理(MAC)的管理随着时间的推移而增加。
    方法:对全国麻醉临床结果登记数据进行回顾性评估。在多变量模型中先验选择协变量,以确定在2010年至2018年期间进行选择性动静脉通路创建的成年人的麻醉类型的预测因素。
    结果:共有144,392例患者符合标准;90,741例(62.8%)接受了全身麻醉。区域麻醉和MAC的使用随着时间的推移而下降(8.0%-6.8%,36.8%-27.8%,分别;两者p<0.0001)。接受区域麻醉的患者更有可能有ASA身体状况>III和居住在农村地区(52.3%和12.9%,分别;两者p<0.0001)。接受MAC的患者更有可能年龄较大,男性,在南方以外接受护理,并居住在城市地区(中位年龄65岁,56.8%,68.1%,70.8%,分别;所有p<0.0001)。多变量分析表明,作为男性,具有ASA物理状态>III,年龄每增加5岁导致接受全身麻醉替代治疗的几率增加(区域麻醉调整比值比(AORs)分别为1.06,1.12和1.26,MACAORs分别为1.09,1.2和1.1;所有p<0.0001).在中西部的治疗,南,与东北相比,或西部与接受全身麻醉替代方案的几率降低相关(区域麻醉AORs0.28,0.38和0.03,均p<0.0001;MAC分别为0.76,0.13和0.43;均p<0.05).
    结论:随着时间的推移,全身麻醉仍然是主要的麻醉类型,区域麻醉和局部麻醉用于建立动静脉通路的MAC的使用减少了。麻醉选择,然而,因患者特征和地理位置而异。
    UNASSIGNED: We sought to evaluate differences in primary anesthetic type used in arteriovenous access creation with the hypothesis that administration of regional anesthesia and monitored anesthesia care (MAC) with local anesthesia as the primary anesthetic has increased over time.
    UNASSIGNED: National Anesthesia Clinical Outcomes Registry data were retrospectively evaluated. Covariates were selected a priori within multivariate models to determine predictors of anesthetic type in adults who underwent elective arteriovenous access creation between 2010 and 2018.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 144,392 patients met criteria; 90,741 (62.8%) received general anesthesia. The use of regional anesthesia and MAC decreased over time (8.0%-6.8%, 36.8%-27.8%, respectively; both p < 0.0001). Patients who underwent regional anesthesia were more likely to have ASA physical status >III and to reside in rural areas (52.3% and 12.9%, respectively; both p < 0.0001). Patients who underwent MAC were more likely to be older, male, receive care outside the South, and reside in urban areas (median age 65, 56.8%, 68.1%, and 70.8%, respectively; all p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis revealed that being male, having an ASA physical status >III, and each 5-year increase in age resulted in increased odds of receiving alternatives to general anesthesia (regional anesthesia adjusted odds ratios (AORs) 1.06, 1.12, and 1.26, MAC AORs 1.09, 1.2, and 1.1, respectively; all p < 0.0001). Treatment in the Midwest, South, or West was associated with decreased odds of receiving alternatives to general anesthesia compared to the Northeast (regional anesthesia AORs 0.28, 0.38, and 0.03, all p < 0.0001; MAC 0.76, 0.13, and 0.43, respectively; all p < 0.05).
    UNASSIGNED: Use of regional anesthesia and MAC with local anesthesia for arteriovenous access creation has decreased over time with general anesthesia remaining the primary anesthetic type. Anesthetic choice, however, varies with patient characteristics and geography.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探讨阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者全髋关节置换术(THA)后的预后。根据实践指南的发布,评估区域麻醉(RA)与全身麻醉(GA)的使用趋势。根据麻醉类型比较术后结局。
    方法:回顾性分析。
    方法:手术室。
    方法:349,008名在佛罗里达州接受选择性THA的患者,纽约,马里兰,和肯塔基州在2007年至2014年之间是从州住院数据库(SID)中提取的,医疗保健成本和利用项目,包括18,063例OSA患者(5.2%)。
    方法:无干预。
    方法:使用双变量分析和多变量逻辑回归模型研究OSA对术后结局的影响。研究结果包括住院死亡率,术后并发症,停留时间(LOS)和出院后再入院。只有来自纽约的人口,(n=105,838,其中5306例OSA患者[5.0%]),我们根据麻醉类型调查了OSA人群的结局.对每个年度进行总体分析。
    结果:OSA患病率从2007年的1.7%上升到2014年的7.1%。在多变量分析中,OSA对院内死亡率无影响(aOR:0.57;0.31-1.04).术后并发症,LOS,OSA患者的再入院率均较高。在接受GA的OSA患者中,我们发现总体并发症和肺部并发症的发生率较高,尤其是男性,女性90日再入院的发生率较高.在学习期间,OSA患者的GA使用率增加。
    结论:在研究期间,接受THA的患者的OSA患病率增加了四倍。OSA与术后总并发症增加有关,LOS,和重新接纳,但不是住院死亡率。尽管发表了倾向于RA而不是GA的指南,研究期间GA的使用增加。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate postoperative outcomes following total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). To evaluate trends in the use of regional anesthesia (RA) versus general anesthesia (GA) following the publication of practical guidelines. To compare postoperative outcomes according to anesthesia type.
    METHODS: Retrospective analysis.
    METHODS: Operating room.
    METHODS: 349,008 patients who underwent elective THA in Florida, New York, Maryland, and Kentucky between 2007 and 2014 were extracted from the State Inpatient Databases (SID), Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, including 18,063 patients with OSA (5.2%).
    METHODS: No intervention.
    METHODS: The effect of OSA on postoperative outcomes was investigated using bivariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression models. Outcomes studied included in-hospital mortality, postoperative complications, length of stay (LOS), and post-discharge readmissions. In a population from New York only, (n = 105,838 with 5306 patients with OSA [5.0%]), we investigated the outcomes in the OSA population according to the anesthesia type. Analysis was performed overall and for each individual year.
    RESULTS: The OSA prevalence increased from 1.7% in 2007 to 7.1% in 2014. In multivariable analysis, there was no effect of OSA on in-hospital mortality (aOR:0.57; 0.31-1.04). Postoperative complications, LOS, and readmission rates were all higher in patients with OSA. In patients with OSA receiving GA than those receiving RA, we found a higher rate of complications overall and pulmonary complications specifically in men and higher rate of 90-day readmission in women. Over the study period, the rate of GA use in patients with OSA increased.
    CONCLUSIONS: The OSA prevalence in patients undergoing THA increased fourfold over the study period. OSA was associated with increased overall postoperative complications, LOS, and readmission, but not with in-hospital mortality. Despite the publication of guidelines favoring RA over GA, the use of GA increased over the study period.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    血管内动脉瘤修复术(EVAR)越来越多地用于腹主动脉瘤(AAAs)患者的管理,包括在AAA破裂的紧急设置中。在“破裂患者的即时管理:开放与血管内修复试验”中观察到的局部麻醉(LA)下接受紧急EVAR的患者死亡率较低,这引发了人们对EVAR麻醉选择的新兴趣。本系统评价麻醉方式对EVAR术后预后的影响。
    根据系统评价的首选报告项目和荟萃分析指南进行综述。主要结果是住院/30天死亡率,包括紧急和选择性EVAR。估计每个单独研究的相对死亡风险,而不调整潜在的混杂因素。
    医院。
    共有来自22项非随机研究的39,744名患者纳入分析。
    无。
    在23,202名患者中进行了16项研究,将LA与全身麻醉(GA)进行了比较,并报告了住院/30天死亡率。LA急诊EVAR后未调整的死亡风险低于GA。择期手术的趋势不太清楚。
    在急诊和择期设置中都有一些证据表明麻醉模式可能与改善预后相关。特别是,LA似乎对紧急EVAR后的结果有积极影响。由于缺乏随机试验数据,混淆的重大风险仍然存在。应进一步研究EVAR的最佳麻醉模式,并确定为特定患者选择特定麻醉技术的原因。
    Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is used increasingly in the management of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs), including in the emergency setting for ruptured AAA. The lower mortality among patients undergoing emergency EVAR under local anesthesia (LA) observed in the Immediate Management of Patients with Rupture: Open Versus Endovascular Repair trial has sparked renewed interest in the anesthesia choice for EVAR. This systematic review evaluates the effect of mode of anesthesia on outcomes after EVAR.
    The review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. The primary outcome was in-hospital/30-day mortality, and both emergency and elective EVAR were included. The relative risk of death was estimated for each individual study without adjustment for potential confounding factors.
    Hospitals.
    A total of 39,744 patients from 22 nonrandomized studies were included in the analysis.
    None.
    Sixteen studies in 23,202 patients compared LA to general anesthesia (GA) and reported in-hospital/30-day mortality. The unadjusted risk of death after emergency EVAR with LA was lower than with GA. Trends in elective surgery were less clear.
    There is some evidence across both emergency and elective settings to suggest that mode of anesthesia may be associated with improved outcomes. In particular, LA appears to have a positive effect on outcome after emergency EVAR. Because of the lack of randomized trial data, a significant risk of confounding remains. The optimal mode of anesthesia for EVAR should be investigated further and the reasons why particular anesthesia techniques are chosen for particular patients identified.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:肥胖在进行全髋关节置换术的患者中越来越常见,以前的研究表明,全髋关节置换术与手术时间的增加有关。减少手术时间和房间时间对于满足增加的全髋关节置换术的需求至关重要。和影响这些指标的因素应该量化,以便有针对性地减少时间和调整报销模式。这是第一项使用多变量方法来确定哪些因素会增加全髋关节置换术的手术时间和房间时间的研究。
    方法:使用美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改善计划数据库来确定2006年至2012年间进行全髋关节置换术的30,361例患者的队列。患者人口统计学,合并症,包括体重指数,和麻醉类型被用来创建广义线性模型,识别手术时间和房间时间增加的独立预测因素。
    结果:病态肥胖(体重指数>40)独立地将手术时间增加了13分钟,将室内时间增加了18分钟。充血性心力衰竭导致整体房间时间的最大增加,增加20分钟。麻醉方法进一步影响房间时间,与脊髓或区域麻醉相比,全身麻醉导致室内时间增加18分钟。
    结论:肥胖是全髋关节置换术手术时间增加的主要驱动因素。充血性心力衰竭,全身麻醉,和病态肥胖都会导致整体房间时间的大幅增加,充血性心力衰竭导致整体房间时间的最大增加。
    BACKGROUND: Obesity is increasingly common in patients having total hip arthroplasty, and previous studies have shown a correlation with increased operative time in total hip arthroplasty. Decreasing operative time and room time is essential to meeting the increased demand for total hip arthroplasty, and factors that influence these metrics should be quantified to allow for targeted reduction in time and adjusted reimbursement models. This is the first study to use a multivariate approach to identify which factors increase operative time and room time in total hip arthroplasty.
    METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to identify a cohort of 30,361 patients having total hip arthroplasty between 2006 and 2012. Patient demographics, comorbidities including body mass index, and anesthesia type were used to create generalized linear models identifying independent predictors of increased operative time and room time.
    RESULTS: Morbid obesity (body mass index >40) independently increased operative time by 13 minutes and room time 18 by minutes. Congestive heart failure led to the greatest increase in overall room time, resulting in a 20-minute increase. Anesthesia method further influenced room time, with general anesthesia resulting in an increased room time of 18 minutes compared with spinal or regional anesthesia.
    CONCLUSIONS: Obesity is the major driver of increased operative time in total hip arthroplasty. Congestive heart failure, general anesthesia, and morbid obesity each lead to substantial increases in overall room time, with congestive heart failure leading to the greatest increase in overall room time.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号