Introduction: Structural Variants (SVs) are a type of variation that can significantly influence phenotypes and cause diseases. Thus, the accurate detection of SVs is a vital part of modern genetic analysis. The advent of long-read sequencing technology ushers in a new era of more accurate and comprehensive SV calling, and many tools have been developed to call SVs using long-read data. Haplotype-tagging is a procedure that can tag haplotype information on reads and can thus potentially improve the SV detection; nevertheless, few methods make use of this information. In this article, we introduce HapKled, a new SV detection tool that can accurately detect SVs from Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) long-read alignment data. Methods: HapKled utilizes haplotype information underlying alignment data by conducting haplotype-tagging using Whatshap on the reads to improve the detection performance, with three unique calling mechanics including altering clustering conditions according to haplotype information of signatures, determination of similar SVs based on haplotype information, and slack filtering conditions based on haplotype quality. Results: In our evaluations, HapKled outperformed state-of-the-art tools and can deliver better SV detection results on both simulated and real sequencing data. The code and experiments of HapKled can be obtained from https://github.com/CoREse/HapKled. Discussion: With the superb SV detection performance that HapKled can deliver, HapKled could be useful in bioinformatics research, clinical diagnosis, and medical research and development.

BACKGROUND: At a global scale, the SARS-CoV-2 virus did not remain in its initial genotype for a long period of time, with the first global reports of variants of concern (VOCs) in late 2020. Subsequently, genome sequencing has become an indispensable tool for characterizing the ongoing pandemic, particularly for typing SARS-CoV-2 samples obtained from patients or environmental surveillance. For such SARS-CoV-2 typing, various in vitro and in silico workflows exist, yet to date, no systematic cross-platform validation has been reported.
RESULTS: In this work, we present the first comprehensive cross-platform evaluation and validation of in silico SARS-CoV-2 typing workflows. The evaluation relies on a dataset of 54 patient-derived samples sequenced with several different in vitro approaches on all relevant state-of-the-art sequencing platforms. Moreover, we present UnCoVar, a robust, production-grade reproducible SARS-CoV-2 typing workflow that outperforms all other tested approaches in terms of precision and recall.
CONCLUSIONS: In many ways, the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has accelerated the development of techniques and analytical approaches. We believe that this can serve as a blueprint for dealing with future pandemics. Accordingly, UnCoVar is easily generalizable towards other viral pathogens and future pandemics. The fully automated workflow assembles virus genomes from patient samples, identifies existing lineages, and provides high-resolution insights into individual mutations. UnCoVar includes extensive quality control and automatically generates interactive visual reports. UnCoVar is implemented as a Snakemake workflow. The open-source code is available under a BSD 2-clause license at github.com/IKIM-Essen/uncovar.

The integration of target capture systems with next-generation sequencing has emerged as an efficient tool for exploring specific genetic regions with a high resolution and facilitating the rapid discovery of novel alleles. Despite these advancements, the application of targeted sequencing methodologies, such as the myBaits technology, in polyploid oat species remains relatively unexplored. In this study, we utilized the myBaits target capture method offered by Daicel Arbor Biosciences to detect variants and assess their reliability for variant detection in oat genomics and breeding. Ten oat genotypes were carefully chosen for targeted sequencing, focusing on specific regions on chromosome 2A to detect variants. The selected region harbors 98 genes. Precisely designed baits targeting the genes within these regions were employed for the target capture sequencing. We employed various mappers and variant callers to identify variants. After the identification of variants, we focused on the variants identified via all variants callers to assess the applicability of the myBaits sequencing methodology in oat breeding. In our efforts to validate the identified variants, we focused on two SNPs, one deletion and one insertion identified via all variant callers in the genotypes KF-318 and NOS 819111-70 but absent in the remaining eight genotypes. The Sanger sequencing of targeted SNPs failed to reproduce target capture data obtained through the myBaits technology. Similarly, the validation of deletion and insertion variants via high-resolution melting (HRM) curve analysis also failed to reproduce target capture data, again suggesting limitations in the reliability of the myBaits target capture sequencing using short-read sequencing for variant detection in the oat genome. This study shed light on the importance of exercising caution when employing the myBaits target capture strategy for variant detection in oats. This study provides valuable insights for breeders seeking to advance oat breeding efforts and marker development using myBaits target capture sequencing, emphasizing the significance of methodological sequencing considerations in oat genomics research.

Whole-genome sequencing is widely used to investigate population genomic variation in organisms of interest. Assorted tools have been independently developed to call variants from short-read sequencing data aligned to a reference genome, including single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and structural variations (SVs). We developed SNP-SVant, an integrated, flexible, and computationally efficient bioinformatic workflow that predicts high-confidence SNPs and SVs in organisms without benchmarked variants, which are traditionally used for distinguishing sequencing errors from real variants. In the absence of these benchmarked datasets, we leverage multiple rounds of statistical recalibration to increase the precision of variant prediction. The SNP-SVant workflow is flexible, with user options to tradeoff accuracy for sensitivity. The workflow predicts SNPs and small insertions and deletions using the Genome Analysis ToolKit (GATK) and predicts SVs using the Genome Rearrangement IDentification Software Suite (GRIDSS), and it culminates in variant annotation using custom scripts. A key utility of SNP-SVant is its scalability. Variant calling is a computationally expensive procedure, and thus, SNP-SVant uses a workflow management system with intermediary checkpoint steps to ensure efficient use of resources by minimizing redundant computations and omitting steps where dependent files are available. SNP-SVant also provides metrics to assess the quality of called variants and converts between VCF and aligned FASTA format outputs to ensure compatibility with downstream tools to calculate selection statistics, which are commonplace in population genomics studies. By accounting for both small and large structural variants, users of this workflow can obtain a wide-ranging view of genomic alterations in an organism of interest. Overall, this workflow advances our capabilities in assessing the functional consequences of different types of genomic alterations, ultimately improving our ability to associate genotypes with phenotypes. © 2024 The Authors. Current Protocols published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol: Predicting single nucleotide polymorphisms and structural variations Support Protocol 1: Downloading publicly available sequencing data Support Protocol 2: Visualizing variant loci using Integrated Genome Viewer Support Protocol 3: Converting between VCF and aligned FASTA formats.

In cancer genomics, variant calling has advanced, but traditional mean accuracy evaluations are inadequate for biomarkers like tumor mutation burden, which vary significantly across samples, affecting immunotherapy patient selection and threshold settings. In this study, we introduce TMBstable, an innovative method that dynamically selects optimal variant calling strategies for specific genomic regions using a meta-learning framework, distinguishing it from traditional callers with uniform sample-wide strategies. The process begins with segmenting the sample into windows and extracting meta-features for clustering, followed by using a pre-trained meta-model to select suitable algorithms for each cluster, thereby addressing strategy-sample mismatches, reducing performance fluctuations and ensuring consistent performance across various samples. We evaluated TMBstable using both simulated and real non-small cell lung cancer and nasopharyngeal carcinoma samples, comparing it with advanced callers. The assessment, focusing on stability measures, such as the variance and coefficient of variation in false positive rate, false negative rate, precision and recall, involved 300 simulated and 106 real tumor samples. Benchmark results showed TMBstable\'s superior stability with the lowest variance and coefficient of variation across performance metrics, highlighting its effectiveness in analyzing the counting-based biomarker. The TMBstable algorithm can be accessed at https://github.com/hello-json/TMBstable for academic usage only.

Genomic sequencing of clinical samples to identify emerging variants of SARS-CoV-2 has been a key public health tool for curbing the spread of the virus. As a result, an unprecedented number of SARS-CoV-2 genomes were sequenced during the COVID-19 pandemic, which allowed for rapid identification of genetic variants, enabling the timely design and testing of therapies and deployment of new vaccine formulations to combat the new variants. However, despite the technological advances of deep sequencing, the analysis of the raw sequence data generated globally is neither standardized nor consistent, leading to vastly disparate sequences that may impact identification of variants. Here, we show that for both Illumina and Oxford Nanopore sequencing platforms, downstream bioinformatic protocols used by industry, government, and academic groups resulted in different virus sequences from same sample. These bioinformatic workflows produced consensus genomes with differences in single nucleotide polymorphisms, inclusion and exclusion of insertions, and/or deletions, despite using the same raw sequence as input datasets. Here, we compared and characterized such discrepancies and propose a specific suite of parameters and protocols that should be adopted across the field. Consistent results from bioinformatic workflows are fundamental to SARS-CoV-2 and future pathogen surveillance efforts, including pandemic preparation, to allow for a data-driven and timely public health response.

Structural Variants (SVs) are a crucial type of genetic variant that can significantly impact phenotypes. Therefore, the identification of SVs is an essential part of modern genomic analysis. In this article, we present kled, an ultra-fast and sensitive SV caller for long-read sequencing data given the specially designed approach with a novel signature-merging algorithm, custom refinement strategies and a high-performance program structure. The evaluation results demonstrate that kled can achieve optimal SV calling compared to several state-of-the-art methods on simulated and real long-read data for different platforms and sequencing depths. Furthermore, kled excels at rapid SV calling and can efficiently utilize multiple Central Processing Unit (CPU) cores while maintaining low memory usage. The source code for kled can be obtained from https://github.com/CoREse/kled.

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has revolutionized the field of rare disease diagnostics. Whole exome and whole genome sequencing are now routinely used for diagnostic purposes; however, the overall diagnosis rate remains lower than expected. In this work, we review current approaches used for calling and interpretation of germline genetic variants in the human genome, and discuss the most important challenges that persist in the bioinformatic analysis of NGS data in medical genetics. We describe and attempt to quantitatively assess the remaining problems, such as the quality of the reference genome sequence, reproducible coverage biases, or variant calling accuracy in complex regions of the genome. We also discuss the prospects of switching to the complete human genome assembly or the human pan-genome and important caveats associated with such a switch. We touch on arguably the hardest problem of NGS data analysis for medical genomics, namely, the annotation of genetic variants and their subsequent interpretation. We highlight the most challenging aspects of annotation and prioritization of both coding and non-coding variants. Finally, we demonstrate the persistent prevalence of pathogenic variants in the coding genome, and outline research directions that may enhance the efficiency of NGS-based disease diagnostics.

Exome sequencing (ES) is a recommended first-tier diagnostic test for many rare monogenic diseases. It allows for the detection of both single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) and copy number variants (CNVs) in coding exonic regions of the genome in a single test, and this dual analysis is a valuable approach, especially in limited resource settings. Single-nucleotide variants are well studied; however, the incorporation of copy number variant analysis tools into variant calling pipelines has not been implemented yet as a routine diagnostic test, and chromosomal microarray is still more widely used to detect copy number variants. Research shows that combined single and copy number variant analysis can lead to a diagnostic yield of up to 58%, increasing the yield with as much as 18% from the single-nucleotide variant only pipeline. Importantly, this is achieved with the consideration of computational costs only, without incurring any additional sequencing costs. This mini review provides an overview of copy number variant analysis from exome data and what the current recommendations are for this type of analysis. We also present an overview on rare monogenic disease research standard practices in resource-limited settings. We present evidence that integrating copy number variant detection tools into a standard exome sequencing analysis pipeline improves diagnostic yield and should be considered a significantly beneficial addition, with relatively low-cost implications. Routine implementation in underrepresented populations and limited resource settings will promote generation and sharing of CNV datasets and provide momentum to build core centers for this niche within genomic medicine.

BACKGROUND: The accurate detection of variants is essential for genomics-based studies. Currently, there are various tools designed to detect genomic variants, however, it has always been a challenge to decide which tool to use, especially when various major genome projects have chosen to use different tools. Thus far, most of the existing tools were mainly developed to work on short-read data (i.e., Illumina); however, other sequencing technologies (e.g. PacBio, and Oxford Nanopore) have recently shown that they can also be used for variant calling. In addition, with the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI)-based variant calling tools, there is a pressing need to compare these tools in terms of efficiency, accuracy, computational power, and ease of use.
RESULTS: In this study, we evaluated five of the most widely used conventional and AI-based variant calling tools (BCFTools, GATK4, Platypus, DNAscope, and DeepVariant) in terms of accuracy and computational cost using both short-read and long-read data derived from three different sequencing technologies (Illumina, PacBio HiFi, and ONT) for the same set of samples from the Genome In A Bottle project. The analysis showed that AI-based variant calling tools supersede conventional ones for calling SNVs and INDELs using both long and short reads in most aspects. In addition, we demonstrate the advantages and drawbacks of each tool while ranking them in each aspect of these comparisons.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides best practices for variant calling using AI-based and conventional variant callers with different types of sequencing data.