Tamoxifen, a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM), is a hormone therapy used for the treatment of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer. We report the case of a 29-year-old premenopausal lady with a history of infertility treatments who was diagnosed with ER-positive infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC) of the breast. Following a modified radical mastectomy (MRM) and adjuvant systemic chemotherapy, tamoxifen was recommended as part of her adjuvant hormonal therapy. After over three years of tamoxifen use, the patient complained of gradual blurring of vision in both eyes. Ophthalmological examinations indicated bilateral maculopathy, a rare but alarming ocular side effect attributed to tamoxifen use. This case report emphasizes the significance of ophthalmic tests in patients on tamoxifen therapy to monitor any potential ocular side effects. While tamoxifen has shown remarkable benefits in the adjuvant treatment of ER-positive breast cancer, including lowering the chance of recurrence and increasing survival rates, clinicians must be acquainted with rare but potential vision-threatening consequences such as tamoxifen-induced maculopathy. Early detection and timely management are critical in reducing the risk of vision loss in patients receiving tamoxifen for breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma is the most common type of liver cancer, accounting for 70% to 85% of individuals with primary liver cancer. Tamoxifen has been evaluated in randomised clinical trials in people with hepatocellular cancer. The reported results have been inconsistent.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the benefits and harms of tamoxifen or tamoxifen plus any other anticancer drugs compared with no intervention, placebo, any type of standard care, or alternative treatment in adults with hepatocellular carcinoma, irrespective of sex, administered dose, type of formulation, and duration of treatment.
METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, three other databases, and major trials registries, and handsearched reference lists up to 26 March 2024.
METHODS: Parallel-group randomised clinical trials including adults (aged 18 years and above) diagnosed with advanced or unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Had we found cross-over trials, we would have included only the first trial phase. We did not consider data from quasi-randomised trials for analysis.
RESULTS: Our critical outcomes were all-cause mortality, serious adverse events, and health-related quality of life. Our important outcomes were disease progression, and adverse events considered non-serious.
UNASSIGNED: We assessed risk of bias using the RoB 2 tool.
METHODS: We used standard Cochrane methods and Review Manager. We meta-analysed the outcome data at the longest follow-up. We presented the results of dichotomous outcomes as risk ratios (RR) and continuous data as mean difference (MD), with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using the random-effects model. We summarised the certainty of evidence using GRADE.
METHODS: We included 10 trials that randomised 1715 participants with advanced, unresectable, or terminal stage hepatocellular carcinoma. Six were single-centre trials conducted in Hong Kong, Italy, and Spain, while three were conducted as multicentre trials in single countries (France, Italy, and Spain), and one trial was conducted in nine countries in the Asia-Pacific region (Australia, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Malaysia, Myanmar, New Zealand, Singapore, South Korea, and Thailand). The experimental intervention was tamoxifen in all trials. The control interventions were no intervention (three trials), placebo (six trials), and symptomatic treatment (one trial). Co-interventions were best supportive care (three trials) and standard care (one trial). The remaining six trials did not provide this information. The number of participants in the trials ranged from 22 to 496 (median 99), mean age was 63.7 (standard deviation 4.18) years, and mean proportion of men was 74.7% (standard deviation 42%). Follow-up was three months to five years.
RESULTS: Ten trials evaluated oral tamoxifen at five different dosages (ranging from 20 mg per day to 120 mg per day). All trials investigated one or more of our outcomes. We performed meta-analyses when at least two trials assessed similar types of tamoxifen versus similar control interventions. Eight trials evaluated all-cause mortality at varied follow-up points. Tamoxifen versus the control interventions (i.e. no treatment, placebo, and symptomatic treatment) results in little to no difference in mortality between one and five years (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.06; 8 trials, 1364 participants; low-certainty evidence). In total, 488/682 (71.5%) participants died in the tamoxifen groups versus 487/682 (71.4%) in the control groups. The separate analysis results for one, between two and three, and five years were comparable to the analysis result for all follow-up periods taken together. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of tamoxifen versus no treatment on serious adverse events at one-year follow-up (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.19 to 1.06; 1 trial, 36 participants; very low-certainty evidence). A total of 5/20 (25.0%) participants in the tamoxifen group versus 9/16 (56.3%) participants in the control group experienced serious adverse events. One trial measured health-related quality of life at baseline and at nine months\' follow-up, using the Spitzer Quality of Life Index. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of tamoxifen versus no treatment on health-related quality of life (MD 0.03, 95% CI -0.45 to 0.51; 1 trial, 420 participants; very low-certainty evidence). A second trial found no appreciable difference in global health-related quality of life scores. No further data were provided. Tamoxifen versus control interventions (i.e. no treatment, placebo, or symptomatic treatment) results in little to no difference in disease progression between one and five years\' follow-up (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.14; 4 trials, 720 participants; low-certainty evidence). A total of 191/358 (53.3%) participants in the tamoxifen group versus 198/362 (54.7%) participants in the control group had progression of hepatocellular carcinoma. Tamoxifen versus control interventions (i.e. no treatment or placebo) may have little to no effect on adverse events considered non-serious during treatment, but the evidence is very uncertain (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.45 to 3.06; 4 trials, 462 participants; very low-certainty evidence). A total of 10/265 (3.8%) participants in the tamoxifen group versus 6/197 (3.0%) participants in the control group had adverse events considered non-serious. We identified no trials with participants diagnosed with early stages of hepatocellular carcinoma. We identified no ongoing trials.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on the low- and very low-certainty evidence, the effects of tamoxifen on all-cause mortality, disease progression, serious adverse events, health-related quality of life, and adverse events considered non-serious in adults with advanced, unresectable, or terminal stage hepatocellular carcinoma when compared with no intervention, placebo, or symptomatic treatment could not be established. Our findings are mostly based on trials at high risk of bias with insufficient power (fewer than 100 participants), and a lack of trial data on clinically important outcomes. Therefore, firm conclusions cannot be drawn. Trials comparing tamoxifen administered with any other anticancer drug versus standard care, usual care, or alternative treatment as control interventions were lacking. Evidence on the benefits and harms of tamoxifen in participants at the early stages of hepatocellular carcinoma was also lacking.
BACKGROUND: This Cochrane review had no dedicated funding.
BACKGROUND: Protocol available via DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD014869.

Breast cancer has an average 10-year relative survival reaching 84%. This favorable survival is due, in part, to the introduction of biomarker-guided therapies. We estimated the population-level effect of the introduction of two adjuvant therapies-tamoxifen and trastuzumab-on recurrence using the trend-in-trend pharmacoepidemiologic study design.
We ascertained data on women diagnosed with nonmetastatic breast cancer who were registered in the Danish Breast Cancer Group clinical database. We used the trend-in-trend design to estimate the population-level effect of the introduction of (1) tamoxifen for postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer in 1982, (2) tamoxifen for premenopausal women diagnosed with ER-positive breast cancer in 1999, and (3) trastuzumab for women <60 years diagnosed with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer in 2007.
For the population-level effect of the introduction of tamoxifen among premenopausal women diagnosed with ER-positive breast cancer in 1999, the risk of recurrence decreased by nearly one-half (OR = 0.52), consistent with evidence from clinical trials; however, the estimate was imprecise (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.25, 1.85). We observed an imprecise association between tamoxifen use and recurrence from the time it was introduced in 1982 (OR = 1.24 95% CI = 0.46, 5.11), inconsistent with prior knowledge from clinical trials. For the introduction of trastuzumab in 2007, the estimate was also consistent with trial evidence, though imprecise (OR = 0.51; 95% CI = 0.21, 22.4).
We demonstrated how novel pharmacoepidemiologic analytic designs can be used to evaluate the routine clinical care and effectiveness of therapeutic advancements in a population-based setting while considering some limitations of the approach.

Drug administration in preclinical rodent models is essential for research and the development of novel therapies. Compassionate administration methods have been developed, but these are mostly incompatible with water-insoluble drugs such as tamoxifen or do not allow for precise timing or dosing of the drugs. For more than two decades, tamoxifen has been administered by oral gavage or injection to CreERT2-loxP gene-modified mouse models to spatiotemporally control gene expression, with the numbers of such inducible models steadily increasing in recent years. Animal-friendly procedures for accurately administering tamoxifen or other water-insoluble drugs would, therefore, have an important impact on animal welfare. On the basis of a previously published micropipette feeding protocol, we developed palatable formulations to encourage voluntary consumption of tamoxifen. We evaluated the acceptance of the new formulations by mice during training and treatment and assessed the efficacy of tamoxifen-mediated induction of CreERT2-loxP-dependent reporter genes. Both sweetened milk and syrup-based formulations encouraged mice to consume tamoxifen voluntarily, but only sweetened milk formulations were statistically noninferior to oral gavage or intraperitoneal injections in inducing CreERT2-mediated gene expression. Serum concentrations of tamoxifen metabolites, quantified using an in-house-developed cell assay, confirmed the lower efficacy of syrup- as compared to sweetened milk-based formulations. We found dosing with a micropipette to be more accurate than oral gavage or injection, with the added advantage that the method requires little training for the experimenter. The new palatable solutions encourage voluntary consumption of tamoxifen without loss of efficacy compared to oral gavage or injections and thus represent a refined administration method.

BACKGROUND: Male factor infertility affect up to 50% of couples unable to conceive spontaneously. Several non-hormonal pharmacological treatments have been proposed to boost spermatogenesis and increase chances of conception in men with infertility. Still, no clear evidence exists on the most effective treatment strategy.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare the effectiveness of non-hormonal pharmacological treatment options for men with infertility using a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL until October 2023 for randomised/quasi-randomised trials that evaluated any non-hormonal pharmacological treatment options for men with idiopathic semen abnormalities or those with hypogonadism. We performed pairwise and network meta-analyses using a random effect model. We assessed risk of bias, heterogeneity, and network inconsistency. We calculated the mean rank and the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) for each intervention the maximum likelihood to achieve each of reported outcomes. We reported primarily on sperm concentration and other important semen and biochemical outcomes using standardised mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence-intervals(CI).
RESULTS: We included 14 randomised trials evaluating four treatments (Clomiphene citrate, Tamoxifen, Aromatase inhibitors, anti-oxidants) and their combinations in 1342 men. The overall quality of included trials was low. Sperm concentration improved with clomiphene compared to anti-oxidants (SMD 2.15, 95%CI 0.78-3.52), aromatase inhibitor (SMD 2.93, 95%CI 1.23-4.62), tamoxifen (SMD - 1.96, 95%CI -3.57; -0.36) but not compared to placebo (SMD - 1.53, 95%CI -3.52- 0.47). Clomiphene had the highest likelihood to achieve the maximum change in sperm concentration (SUCRA 97.4). All treatments showed similar effect for sperm motility, semen volume, and normal sperm morphology. FSH levels showed significant improvement with clomiphene vs.anti-oxidant (SMD 1.48, 95%CI 0.44-2.51) but not compared to placebo. The evidence networks for LH and testosterone suffered from significant inconsistency (p = 0.01) with similar trend of improvement with clomiphene compared to other treatments but not compared to placebo.
CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence to support the routine use of Clomiphene, tamoxifen, and aromatase inhibitors to optimise semen parameters in men with infertility. Future randomised trials are needed to confirm the efficacy of clomiphene in improving fertility outcomes in men.
UNASSIGNED: CRD42023430179.

Aberrant estrogen receptor (ERα) signaling mediates detrimental effects of tamoxifen including drug resistance and endometrial hyperplasia. ERα36, an alternative isoform of ERα, contributes to these effects. We have demonstrated that CK2 modulates ERα expression and function in breast cancer (BCa). Here, we assess if CX-4945 (CX), a clinical stage CK2 inhibitor, can disrupt ERα66 and ERα36 signaling in BCa. Using live cell imaging, we assessed the antiproliferative effects of CX in tamoxifen-sensitive and tamoxifen-resistant BCa cells in monolayer and/or spheroid cultures. CX-induced alterations in ERα66 and ERα36 mRNA and protein expression were assessed by RT-PCR and immunoblot. Co-immunoprecipitation was performed to determine the differential interaction of ERα isoforms with HSP90 and CK2 upon CX exposure. CX caused concentration-dependent decreases in proliferation in tamoxifen-sensitive MCF-7 and tamoxifen-resistant MCF-7 Tam1 cells and significantly repressed spheroid growth in 3D models. Additionally, CX caused dramatic decreases in endogenous or exogenously expressed ERα66 and ERα36 protein. Silencing of CK2β, the regulatory subunit of CK2, resulted in destabilization and decreased proliferation, similar to CX. Co-immunoprecipitation demonstrated that ERα66/36 show CK2 dependance for interaction with molecular chaperone HSP90. Our findings show that CK2 functions regulate the protein stability of ERα66 and ERα36 through a mechanism that is dependent on CK2β subunit and HSP90 chaperone function. CX may be a component of a novel therapeutic strategy that targets both tamoxifen-sensitive and tamoxifen-resistant BCa, providing an additional tool to treat ERα-positive BCa.

UNASSIGNED: Studies highlighted the bidirectional crosstalk between the HER family members in breast cancer as resistance mechanism to anti-HER agents. Cross-signaling between HER2/EGFR and ER/IGF1R could play role in the development of resistance to therapeutics hence stimulating cell growth. To overcome this resistance, combined therapies targeting both pathways simultaneously have been proposed as an effective strategy. The involvement of miRNAs in resistance of targeted therapies like trastuzumab was demonstrated in recent studies. Hence the regulation of miRNAs in resistance state could reverse the cell behaviour to drugs. Previously we found that overexpression of miR-770-5p downregulated AKT and ERK expression through HER2 signaling and potentiated the effect of trastuzumab. In this study we examined the impact of miR-770-5p on trastuzumab resistance.
UNASSIGNED: Cells were treated with tamoxifen or trastuzumab to examine their role in bidirectional crosstalk. The molecule mechanism of miR-770-5p on HER2/EGFR/IGF1R bidirectional crosstalk was explored by western blot. The expression of miR-770-5p in trastuzumab resistant cells was examined by q-PCR. To investigate the effect of miR-770-5p on cancer cell proliferation in trastuzumab resistance state, resistant cells were analyzed by iCELLigence real-time cell analyzer.
UNASSIGNED: miR-770-5p expression was significantly downregulated in trastuzumab-resistant BT-474 and SK-BR-3 cells. Overexpression of miR-770-5p sensitized the resistant cells to trastuzumab, as evidenced by reduced cell proliferation and increased cell viability. Additionally, in resistant cells, increased expression and activation of EGFR and IGF1R were observed. However, miR-770-5p overexpression resulted in decreased phosphorylation of AKT and ERK, indicating its suppressive role in EGFR/HER2 signaling. Furthermore, miR-770-5p downregulated the expression of IGF1R and mTOR, suggesting its involvement in regulating the escape signaling mediated by IGF1R in resistance.
UNASSIGNED: In conclusion, our findings demonstrate the critical role of miR-770-5p in regulating bidirectional crosstalk and overcoming trastuzumab resistance in breast cancer cells. These results highlight the potential of miR-770-5p as a therapeutic target to improve the efficacy of targeted therapies and address resistance mechanisms in breast cancer.

Tamoxifen, a pivotal therapy for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, is known for its efficacy in reducing breast cancer recurrence and mortality. However, concerns about potential ocular complications, particularly maculopathy, have emerged. This study aims to investigate the risk and associated factors of diverse macular conditions in tamoxifen users, considering drug exposure, demographics, and systemic diseases. A nationwide cohort of tamoxifen users, comprised of 14,267 tamoxifen users, was analyzed using the health insurance review and assessment database in South Korea. Demographic and clinical characteristics were examined, and the cumulative incidence of macular diseases was stratified by age and cumulative tamoxifen dosage. We conducted logistic regression analysis to identify potential risk factors among clinical variables such as age, sex, indications for tamoxifen use, and systemic diseases associated with various macular conditions. Additionally, Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine the baseline clinical characteristics predictive of these macular conditions, with subsequent calculation of hazard ratios. Cumulative incidences of overall macular diseases, other maculopathy excluding common macular diseases, and macular edema were 26.4, 11.4, and 6.5%, respectively. The incidence of various macular conditions increased with age and the cumulative tamoxifen dose. Age, cumulative dose group, and liver diseases demonstrated significant associations with overall macular diseases and maculopathy excluding common macular diseases in multivariate logistic regression analyses (all P < 0.05). Furthermore, age emerged as significant predictive factors of maculopathy in Cox proportional hazard models. Tamoxifen-induced maculopathy poses a concern for prescribing physicians and ophthalmologists, and this study provides valuable insights into its risk and risk factors. This study may contribute to evidence-based guidelines for tamoxifen maculopathy screening, emphasizing the importance of considering age, cumulative dose, and liver diseases for recommendation on screening timing and frequency.

OBJECTIVE: Estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer represents about 80% of cases, tamoxifen is the election neoadjuvant chemotherapy. However, a large percentage of patients develop chemoresistance, compromising recovery. Clinical evidence suggests that high plasmatic levels of low-density lipoproteins (LDL) could promote cancer progression. The present study analyzed the effect of LDL on the primary plasmatic active Tamoxifen\'s metabolites resistance acquisition, 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4OH-Tam) and 4-hydroxy-N-desmethyl-tamoxifen (endoxifen), in breast cancer ERα + cells (MCF-7).
METHODS: Two resistant cellular variants, MCF-7Var-H and MCF-7Var-I, were generated by a novel strategy and their phenotype features were evaluated. Phenotypic assessment was performed by MTT assays, cytometry, immunofluorescence microscopy, zymography and protein expression analysis.
RESULTS: MCF-7Var-H, generated only with tamoxifen metabolites, showed a critical down-regulation in hormone receptors, augmented migration capacity, metalloprotease 9 extracellular medium excretion, and a mesenchymal morphology in contrast with native MCF-7, suggesting the transition towards Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) phenotype. In contrast, MCF-7Var-I which was generated in a high LDL media, showed only a slight upregulation in ER and other less noticeable metabolic adaptations. Results suggest a potential role of transcription factor nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) in phenotypic differences observed among variants.
CONCLUSIONS: LDL high or low concentrations during Tamoxifen´s metabolites chemoresistance acquisition leads to different cellular mechanisms related to chemoresistance. A novel adaptative cellular response associated with Nrf2 activity could be implicated.

Estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer seriously endangers the women\'s physical and mental health worldwide and ER targeting therapy is vital. Here, we found that a citrus polymethoxyflavones (PMFs)-rich hydrolysate (C-H) and its major components (nobiletin and 3-methoxynobiletin) potently degrade ERα protein via the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway, thereby impairing the proliferation of ER+ breast cancer cells. Moreover, our study exhibited that C-H combined with tamoxifen (TAM) inhibited the cell proliferation of ER+ breast cancer in vitro. It was further confirmed that C-H decreased tumor growth of ER+ breast cancer in tumor-bearing 129 mice in vivo and improved the efficacy of tamoxifen. Our study revealed that the citrus PMFs have potential applications as pharmaceutical and healthcare products in breast cancer treatment by targeting ERα protein degradation.