Our study aimed to evaluate the clinical and laboratory features of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) children with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) arthritis. In the retrospective cohort study, we analyzed data of 753 patients with JIA aged 2-17 years, depending on TMJ arthritis or not. TMJ arthritis can to be diagnosed in the presence of at least two of the following clinical signs of inflammation: pain in TMJ, jaw opening limitation, jaw opening deviation, and micrognathia. We compared clinical, laboratory, and treatment features in JIA patients depending on the involvement of TMJ. TMJ arthritis was detected in 43 (5.7%) of our patients and associated with a longer course of the disease, polyarticular JIA category, treatment with systemic corticosteroids, and longer achievement of the remission and involvement of cervical spine, hip, and shoulder. Active joints >8 (OR = 14.9, p = 0.0000001), delayed remission >7 years (OR = 3.1; p = 0.0004), delayed hip involvement (OR = 4.6; p = 0.041), hip osteoarthritis (OR = 4.0; p = 0.014), cervical spine arthritis (OR = 10.3, p = 0.000001), and corticosteroid treatment (OR = 2.3, p = 0.0007) were associated with TMJ involvement. Patients with TMJ arthritis require more biologics (OR = 3.2, p = 0.0006, HR = 2.4, p = 0.005) and have decreased probability of remission achievement (p = 0.014). Consequently, TMJ arthritis was associated with a severe disease course. Early biologic treatment and corticosteroid avoidance might decrease TMJ involvement.

BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative disorder characterized by chronic inflammatory response of cartilage and articular surface involving Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ). Pain as one of the major symptom of osteoarthritis affects the quality of life and is usually managed by Non Steroidal Anti Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) such as diclofenac sodium. Bromelain, trypsin and rutoside trihydrate formulation can be used to treat this disease because of anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant effects.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of oral bromelain, trypsin, rutoside trihydrate enzymes and diclofenac sodium combination therapy over diclofenac sodium for the treatment of TMJ osteoarthritis.
METHODS: Thirty Patients with symptomatic TMJ osteoarthritis were randomly divided into three groups. 10 patients were treated with diclofenac sodium (Group 1), 10 were given oral enzymes (bromelain, trypsin, rutoside trihydrate) and diclofenac sodium combination (Group 2), and 10 were treated with oral enzyme preparation (bromelain, trypsin, rutoside trihydrate) (Group 3). Patients were evaluated on day 1, day 4, day 7 and day 10. Comparison of pain rating within three groups was assessed using numeric rating scale. The efficacy criteria were analysed applying ANOVA followed by post-hoc test.
RESULTS: Inter group comparison of the effectiveness of management of pain, resulted in a value p < 0.05 between Group 2 and other two groups, which indicated that Group 2 patients responded better than Group 1 and Group 3, while p > 0.05 between Group 1 and Group 3 showed both groups responded equally to the treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: The trial showed significant improvement in reducing pain in patients treated with oral enzymes and diclofenac sodium combination therapy.

BACKGROUND: Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is characterized by a progressive destruction of the joints. The temporomandibular joints (TMJ) are especially likely to be affected. The often undetected arthritis in the TMJ in particular can cause significant destruction and craniofacial developmental abnormalities. The aim of this study was to analyze the destructive impact of JIA on TMJ and mandibular development.
METHODS: We analyzed a total of 92 joints and mandibular rami using digital cone-beam tomography (CBT) and compared 23 consecutively treated JIA patients with 23 healthy controls, matched for age and gender. We evaluated ramus length, vertical depth of the articular fossa, anterior-posterior dimensions of the mandibular head and condylar process. The statistical analysis was performed using non-parametric Wilcoxon and Kruskal-Wallis Rank Sum tests.
RESULTS: The JIA patients exhibited significantly more pronounced asymmetries. However, we were unable to detect significant differences in the metric measuring distances. The different JIA subtypes exerted no statistically significant influence.
CONCLUSIONS: The possible destruction arising as a result of JIA concerns the TMJ and the length of the mandibular ramus. These craniofacial anomalies demonstrate the central importance of sufficiently early detection and timely treatment in the prevention of such growth disturbances.