Stroke Volume

每搏输出量
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:已经研究了动态动脉弹性(Eadyn)在降压药断奶期间预测低血压的能力。我们的研究重点是评估Eadyn在重症监护病房的危重成年患者中的表现,不管诊断。
    方法:我们的研究是根据系统评价和荟萃分析检查表的首选报告项目进行的。该协议于2023年5月26日在PROSPERO(CRD42023421462)中注册。我们纳入了MEDLINE和Embase数据库的前瞻性观察研究,直至2023年5月。在定量分析中纳入了5项涉及183名患者的研究。我们提取了与患者临床特征相关的数据,以及有关Eadyn测量方法的信息,结果,和去甲肾上腺素剂量.大多数患者(76%)被诊断为感染性休克,而其余患者因其他原因需要去甲肾上腺素。平均压力反应率为36.20%。合成结果的曲线下面积为0.85,灵敏度为0.87(95%CI0.74-0.93),特异性为0.76(95%CI0.68-0.83),诊断比值比为19.07(95%CI8.47-42.92)。亚组分析表明,根据去甲肾上腺素剂量,Eadyn没有变化,Eadyn测量装置,或Eadyn诊断临界值来预测血管加压药支持的停止。
    结论:Eadyn,通过亚组分析进行评估,对危重病患者停止血管加压药支持表现出良好的预测能力。
    BACKGROUND: Dynamic arterial elastance (Eadyn) has been investigated for its ability to predict hypotension during the weaning of vasopressors. Our study focused on assessing Eadyn\'s performance in the context of critically ill adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit, regardless of diagnosis.
    METHODS: Our study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis checklist. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023421462) on May 26, 2023. We included prospective observational studies from the MEDLINE and Embase databases through May 2023. Five studies involving 183 patients were included in the quantitative analysis. We extracted data related to patient clinical characteristics, and information about Eadyn measurement methods, results, and norepinephrine dose. Most patients (76%) were diagnosed with septic shock, while the remaining patients required norepinephrine for other reasons. The average pressure responsiveness rate was 36.20%. The synthesized results yielded an area under the curve of 0.85, with a sensitivity of 0.87 (95% CI 0.74-0.93), specificity of 0.76 (95% CI 0.68-0.83), and diagnostic odds ratio of 19.07 (95% CI 8.47-42.92). Subgroup analyses indicated no variations in the Eadyn based on norepinephrine dosage, the Eadyn measurement device, or the Eadyn diagnostic cutoff to predict cessation of vasopressor support.
    CONCLUSIONS: Eadyn, evaluated through subgroup analyses, demonstrated good predictive ability for the discontinuation of vasopressor support in critically ill patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:导致射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF)发展的确切机制仍未完全确定。在这项研究中,我们采用了一种利用非靶向蛋白质组学和代谢组学的综合方法来描述HFpEF患者与健康对照组相比的蛋白质组学和代谢组学变化.
    方法:数据来自由30名HFpEF参与者和30名健康对照者组成的前瞻性队列,性别和年龄相匹配。血浆样本通过多组学平台进行分析.使用基于数据独立采集的液相色谱-串联质谱(LC-MS/MS)和超高效液相色谱-串联质谱(UHPLC-MS/MS)进行血浆蛋白和代谢物的定量,分别。此外,蛋白质组学和代谢组学结果分别分析,并使用相关性和途径分析进行整合。随后进行了基因本体论(GO)和京都基因和基因组百科全书(KEGG)途径富集研究,以阐明观察到的结果的生物学相关性。
    结果:共鉴定出46种显着差异表达的蛋白质(DEP)和102种差异表达的代谢物(DEM)。然后,通过DEP和DEM进行GO和KEGG途径富集分析。蛋白质组学和代谢组学的综合分析揭示了结核病和非洲锥虫病途径显着富集,其中DEP和DEM富集。与炎症和免疫反应有关。
    结论:整合的蛋白质组学和代谢组学分析揭示了HFpEF中不同的炎症和免疫应答途径,突出新颖的治疗途径。
    BACKGROUND: The precise mechanisms leading to the development of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remain incompletely defined. In this study, an integrative approach utilizing untargeted proteomics and metabolomics was employed to delineate the altered proteomic and metabolomic profiles in patients with HFpEF compared to healthy controls.
    METHODS: Data were collected from a prospective cohort consisting of 30 HFpEF participants and 30 healthy controls, matched by gender and age. plasma samples were analyzed by multi-omics platforms. The quantification of plasma proteins and metabolites was performed using data-independent acquisition-based liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS), respectively. Additionally, Proteomic and metabolomic results were analyzed separately and integrated using correlation and pathway analysis. This was followed by the execution of Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment studies to elucidate the biological relevance of the observed results.
    RESULTS: A total of 46 significantly differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) and 102 differentially expressed metabolites (DEMs) were identified. Then, GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analyses were performed by DEPs and DEMs. Integrated analysis of proteomics and metabolomics has revealed Tuberculosis and African trypanosomiasis pathways that are significantly enriched and the DEPs and DEMs enriched within them, are associated with inflammation and immune response.
    CONCLUSIONS: Integrated proteomic and metabolomic analyses revealed distinct inflammatory and immune response pathways in HFpEF, highlighting novel therapeutic avenues.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评价心脏磁共振(CMR)特征跟踪技术测量的整体纵向应变(GLS)对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者经皮冠状动脉介入(PCI)术后左心室重构(LVR)的预测价值。
    方法:从中国多个中心前瞻性招募了403例急性STEMIPCI患者。心肌梗死后1周(7±2天)和6个月进行CMR检查以获得GLS,全局径向应变(GRS),全局周向应变(GCS),射血分数(LVEF)和梗死面积(IS)。主要终点是LVR,定义为在6个月时,左心室舒张末期容积从CMR确定的基线增加≥20%或左心室收缩末期容积增加≥15%.采用Logistic回归分析评价CMR参数对LVR的预测价值。
    结果:101例患者在心肌梗死后6个月发生了LVR。与没有LVR的(n=302)相比,LVR组患者GLS和GCS显著升高(P<0.001),GRS和LVEF显著降低(P<0.001)。Logistic回归分析显示GLS(OR=1.387,95CI:1.223~1.573;P<0.001)和LVEF(OR=0.951,95CI:0.914~0.990;P=0.015)是LVR的独立预测因子。ROC曲线分析表明,在最佳截止值为-10.6%时,GLS预测LVR的敏感性为74.3%,特异性为71.9%。GLS预测LVR的AUC与LVEF相似(P=0.146),但明显大于GCS等其他参数,GRS和IS(P<0.05);LVEF的AUC与其他参数无明显差异(P>0.05)。
    结论:在接受PCI治疗的STEMI患者中,CMR测量的GLS是LVR发生的重要预测因子,性能优于GRS,GCS,IS和LVEF。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the predictive value of global longitudinal strain (GLS) measured by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) feature-tracking technique for left ventricular remodeling (LVR) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
    METHODS: A total of 403 patients undergoing PCI for acute STEMI were prospectively recruited from multiple centers in China.CMR examinations were performed one week (7±2 days) and 6 months after myocardial infarction to obtain GLS, global radial strain (GRS), global circumferential strain (GCS), ejection fraction (LVEF) and infarct size (IS).The primary endpoint was LVR, defined as an increase of left ventricle end-diastolic volume by ≥20% or an increase of left ventricle end-systolic volume by ≥15% from the baseline determined by CMR at 6 months.Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the predictive value of CMR parameters for LVR.
    RESULTS: LVR occurred in 101 of the patients at 6 months after myocardial infarction.Compared with those without LVR (n=302), the patients in LVR group exhibited significantly higher GLS and GCS (P < 0.001) and lower GRS and LVEF (P < 0.001).Logistic regression analysis indicated that both GLS (OR=1.387, 95%CI: 1.223-1.573;P < 0.001) and LVEF (OR=0.951, 95%CI: 0.914-0.990;P=0.015) were independent predictors of LVR.ROC curve analysis showed that at the optimal cutoff value of-10.6%, GLS had a sensitivity of 74.3% and a specificity of 71.9% for predicting LVR.The AUC of GLS was similar to that of LVEF for predicting LVR (P=0.146), but was significantly greater than those of other parameters such as GCS, GRS and IS (P < 0.05);the AUC of LVEF did not differ significantly from those of the other parameters (P>0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: In patients receiving PCI for STEMI, GLS measured by CMR is a significant predictor of LVR occurrence with better performance than GRS, GCS, IS and LVEF.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    低血压(BP)与心力衰竭(HF)患者的不良预后相关。我们调查了初始血压对HF患者入院时预后的影响,和HF药物的处方模式,如血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEi),血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB),和β受体阻滞剂(BB)。数据来自急性HF患者的多中心队列。将患者分为心力衰竭射血分数降低(HFrEF)和HF轻度射血分数降低/保留(HFmrEF/HFpEF)组。初始收缩期和舒张期BP分为特定范围。在2778名患者中,那些有HFrEF的人被开了ACEi,ARB,或BB在放电时,不管他们最初的BP。然而,HFmrEF/HFpEF患者的药物使用随着BP的降低而趋于减少.HFrEF患者的初始血压较低与全因死亡和复合临床事件的发生率增加相关。包括HF再入院或全因死亡。然而,根据BP,HFmrEF/HFpEF患者的临床结局无显著差异.初始收缩压(<120mmHg)和舒张压(<80mmHg)BP与HFrEF患者长期死亡风险的1.81倍(比值比[OR]1.81,95%置信区间[CI]1.349-2.417,p<0.001)和2.24倍(OR2.24,95%CI1.645-3.053,p<0.001)独立相关,分别。总之,HFrEF患者的低初始血压与不良临床结局相关,和BP<120/80mmHg独立增加死亡率。然而,在HFmrEF/HFpEF患者中未观察到这种关系.
    Low blood pressure (BP) is associated with poor outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF). We investigated the influence of initial BP on the prognosis of HF patients at admission, and prescribing patterns of HF medications, such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), and beta-blockers (BB). Data were sourced from a multicentre cohort of patients admitted for acute HF. Patients were grouped into heart failure reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and HF mildly reduced/preserved ejection fraction (HFmrEF/HFpEF) groups. Initial systolic and diastolic BPs were categorized into specific ranges. Among 2778 patients, those with HFrEF were prescribed ACEi, ARB, or BB at discharge, regardless of their initial BP. However, medication use in HFmrEF/HFpEF patients tended to decrease as BP decreased. Lower initial BP in HFrEF patients correlated with an increased incidence of all-cause death and composite clinical events, including HF readmission or all-cause death. However, no significant differences in clinical outcomes were observed in HFmrEF/HFpEF patients according to BP. Initial systolic (< 120 mmHg) and diastolic (< 80 mmHg) BPs were independently associated with a 1.81-fold (odds ratio [OR] 1.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.349-2.417, p < 0.001) and 2.24-fold (OR 2.24, 95% CI 1.645-3.053, p < 0.001) increased risk of long-term mortality in HFrEF patients, respectively. In conclusion, low initial BP in HFrEF patients correlated with adverse clinical outcomes, and BP < 120/80 mmHg independently increased mortality. However, this relationship was not observed in HFmrEF/HFpEF patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:没有明确的证据表明骨髓单核细胞(BMMNC)与间充质基质细胞(MSC)干细胞治疗慢性心力衰竭(HF)患者。
    方法:使用系统的方法,对HF患者进行干细胞治疗(BMMNCs或MSCs)的合格随机对照试验(RCTs),以对临床结局进行荟萃分析(主要不良心血管事件(MACE),HF住院治疗,和死亡率)和超声心动图指标(包括左心室射血分数(LVEF))使用随机效应模型进行。根据结果的类型合并风险比(RR)或平均差(MD)以及相应的95%置信区间(CI),并进行亚组分析以评估细胞类型之间的潜在差异。
    结果:分析共包括36个RCTs(1549例接受干细胞的HF患者和1252例对照组)。两种类型的细胞在HF患者中的移植导致LVEF的显着改善(BMMNC:MD(95%CI)=3.05(1.11;4.99)和MSCs:MD(95%CI)=2.82(1.19;4.45),亚组之间p=0.86)。干细胞治疗并未导致MACE风险的显著变化(MD(95%CI)=0.83(0.67;1.06),BMMNC:RR(95%CI)=0.59(0.31;1.13),MSC:RR(95%CI)=0.91(0.70;1.19),亚组之间p=0.12)。全因死亡(MD(95%CI)=0.82(0.68;0.99))和再住院(MD(95%CI)=0.77(0.61;0.98))的风险略有降低,细胞类型之间没有差异(p>0.05)。
    结论:两种类型的干细胞均可有效改善心力衰竭患者的LVEF,细胞之间没有任何明显差异。与对照组相比,干细胞移植不能降低主要不良心血管事件的风险。未来的试验应主要关注干细胞移植对HF患者临床结局的影响,以验证或反驳本研究的发现。
    BACKGROUND: There is no clear evidence on the comparative effectiveness of bone-marrow mononuclear cell (BMMNC) vs. mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC) stem cell therapy in patients with chronic heart failure (HF).
    METHODS: Using a systematic approach, eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of stem cell therapy (BMMNCs or MSCs) in patients with HF were retrieved to perform a meta-analysis on clinical outcomes (major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), hospitalization for HF, and mortality) and echocardiographic indices (including left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)) were performed using the random-effects model. A risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) with corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were pooled based on the type of the outcome and subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate the potential differences between the types of cells.
    RESULTS: The analysis included a total of 36 RCTs (1549 HF patients receiving stem cells and 1252 patients in the control group). Transplantation of both types of cells in patients with HF resulted in a significant improvement in LVEF (BMMNCs: MD (95% CI) = 3.05 (1.11; 4.99) and MSCs: MD (95% CI) = 2.82 (1.19; 4.45), between-subgroup p = 0.86). Stem cell therapy did not lead to a significant change in the risk of MACE (MD (95% CI) = 0.83 (0.67; 1.06), BMMNCs: RR (95% CI) = 0.59 (0.31; 1.13) and MSCs: RR (95% CI) = 0.91 (0.70; 1.19), between-subgroup p = 0.12). There was a marginally decreased risk of all-cause death (MD (95% CI) = 0.82 (0.68; 0.99)) and rehospitalization (MD (95% CI) = 0.77 (0.61; 0.98)) with no difference among the cell types (p > 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Both types of stem cells are effective in improving LVEF in patients with heart failure without any noticeable difference between the cells. Transplantation of the stem cells could not decrease the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events compared with controls. Future trials should primarily focus on the impact of stem cell transplantation on clinical outcomes of HF patients to verify or refute the findings of this study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:射血分数保留或轻度降低的心力衰竭(HF)包括异质组患者。将其重新分类为不同的表型群,以实现有针对性的干预是一个优先事项。这项研究旨在识别不同的表型,并比较表型群特征和结果,来自电子健康记录数据。
    方法:从NIHR健康信息学协作数据库中确定了英国五家医院收治的诊断为HF且左心室射血分数≥40%的2,187例患者。基于分区,基于模型,并应用了基于密度的机器学习聚类技术。Cox比例风险和Fine-Gray竞争风险模型用于比较不同表型组的结果(全因死亡率和HF住院率)。
    结果:确定了三个表型:(1)年轻,主要是心脏代谢和冠状动脉疾病患病率高的女性患者;(2)更虚弱的患者,肺部疾病和心房颤动发生率较高;(3)以全身性炎症和糖尿病及肾功能障碍发生率较高的患者。生存概况是不同的,表型组1至3的全因死亡风险增加(p<0.001)。与传统因素相比,表型组成员显著提高了生存预测。表型群不能预测HF的住院治疗。
    结论:将无监督机器学习应用于常规收集的电子健康记录数据,确定了具有不同临床特征和独特生存概况的表型群。
    BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) with preserved or mildly reduced ejection fraction includes a heterogenous group of patients. Reclassification into distinct phenogroups to enable targeted interventions is a priority. This study aimed to identify distinct phenogroups, and compare phenogroup characteristics and outcomes, from electronic health record data.
    METHODS: 2,187 patients admitted to five UK hospitals with a diagnosis of HF and a left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 40% were identified from the NIHR Health Informatics Collaborative database. Partition-based, model-based, and density-based machine learning clustering techniques were applied. Cox Proportional Hazards and Fine-Gray competing risks models were used to compare outcomes (all-cause mortality and hospitalisation for HF) across phenogroups.
    RESULTS: Three phenogroups were identified: (1) Younger, predominantly female patients with high prevalence of cardiometabolic and coronary disease; (2) More frail patients, with higher rates of lung disease and atrial fibrillation; (3) Patients characterised by systemic inflammation and high rates of diabetes and renal dysfunction. Survival profiles were distinct, with an increasing risk of all-cause mortality from phenogroups 1 to 3 (p < 0.001). Phenogroup membership significantly improved survival prediction compared to conventional factors. Phenogroups were not predictive of hospitalisation for HF.
    CONCLUSIONS: Applying unsupervised machine learning to routinely collected electronic health record data identified phenogroups with distinct clinical characteristics and unique survival profiles.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们试图通过自动评估左心室射血分数(LVEF)的人工智能程序(AI-POCUS)来验证新型手持式超声设备的能力。AI-POCUS用于前瞻性扫描两家日本医院的200名患者。将AI-POCUS的自动LVEF与使用高端超声机的标准双平面磁盘方法进行了比较。由于AI-POCUS图像不可行而排除18例患者后,182例(63±15岁,21%的女性)进行了分析。AI-POCUS的LVEF与标准方法之间的组内相关系数(ICC)良好(0.81,p<0.001),没有临床意义的系统偏差(平均偏差-1.5%,p=0.008,一致性限度±15.0%)。检测到LVEF<50%,敏感性为85%(95%置信区间76%-91%),特异性为81%(71%-89%)。尽管通过标准回波和通过AI-POCUS的LV体积之间的相关性很好(ICC>0.80),AI-POCUS倾向于低估较大LV的LV体积(舒张末期体积的总体偏差为42.1mL)。通过使用涉及更大LV的更多数据调整的较新版本的软件来缓解这些趋势,显示相似的相关性(ICC>0.85)。在这个现实世界的多中心研究中,AI-POCUS显示准确的LVEF评估,但是对于数量评估可能需要仔细注意。较新的版本,用更大、更异构的数据训练,展示了改进的性能,强调了大数据积累在该领域的重要性。
    We sought to validate the ability of a novel handheld ultrasound device with an artificial intelligence program (AI-POCUS) that automatically assesses left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). AI-POCUS was used to prospectively scan 200 patients in two Japanese hospitals. Automatic LVEF by AI-POCUS was compared to the standard biplane disk method using high-end ultrasound machines. After excluding 18 patients due to infeasible images for AI-POCUS, 182 patients (63 ± 15 years old, 21% female) were analyzed. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between the LVEF by AI-POCUS and the standard methods was good (0.81, p < 0.001) without clinically meaningful systematic bias (mean bias -1.5%, p = 0.008, limits of agreement ± 15.0%). Reduced LVEF < 50% was detected with a sensitivity of 85% (95% confidence interval 76%-91%) and specificity of 81% (71%-89%). Although the correlations between LV volumes by standard-echo and those by AI-POCUS were good (ICC > 0.80), AI-POCUS tended to underestimate LV volumes for larger LV (overall bias 42.1 mL for end-diastolic volume). These trends were mitigated with a newer version of the software tuned using increased data involving larger LVs, showing similar correlations (ICC > 0.85). In this real-world multicenter study, AI-POCUS showed accurate LVEF assessment, but careful attention might be necessary for volume assessment. The newer version, trained with larger and more heterogeneous data, demonstrated improved performance, underscoring the importance of big data accumulation in the field.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT-2i)是用于治疗2型糖尿病的降糖药,这也改善了心力衰竭,降低了心血管并发症的风险。心外膜脂肪组织(EAT)功能障碍被认为有助于心力衰竭的发展。我们旨在阐明EAT代谢和炎症谱变化在SGLT-2i对严重心力衰竭患者的有益心脏保护作用中的可能作用。
    方法:26名患有严重心力衰竭的受试者,射血分数降低,用SGLT-2i治疗与26例未经治疗的受试者相比,年龄匹配(54.0±2.1vs.55.3±2.1年,n.s.),体重指数(27.8±0.9vs.28.8±1.0kg/m2,n.s.)和左心室射血分数(20.7±0.5vs.23.2±1.7%,n.s.),计划进行心脏移植或机械支持植入的人,包括在研究中。对手术期间获得的EAT进行了复杂的代谢组学和基因表达分析。
    结果:SGLT-2i改善了炎症,如脂肪组织中促炎基因的基因表达谱改善和免疫细胞向EAT的浸润减少所证明的。在代谢组学分析中注意到的用油酸富集醚脂质表明减少了铁中毒的倾向,可能进一步降低SGLT-2i治疗受试者EAT中的氧化应激。
    结论:我们的结果显示SGLT-2i治疗的严重心力衰竭患者的EAT炎症降低,与没有这种疗法的心力衰竭患者相比。EAT炎症和代谢状态的调节可能代表了SGLT-2i相关心力衰竭患者心脏保护作用背后的新机制。
    BACKGROUND: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) are glucose-lowering agents used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus, which also improve heart failure and decrease the risk of cardiovascular complications. Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) dysfunction was suggested to contribute to the development of heart failure. We aimed to elucidate a possible role of changes in EAT metabolic and inflammatory profile in the beneficial cardioprotective effects of SGLT-2i in subjects with severe heart failure.
    METHODS: 26 subjects with severe heart failure, with reduced ejection fraction, treated with SGLT-2i versus 26 subjects without treatment, matched for age (54.0 ± 2.1 vs. 55.3 ± 2.1 years, n.s.), body mass index (27.8 ± 0.9 vs. 28.8 ± 1.0 kg/m2, n.s.) and left ventricular ejection fraction (20.7 ± 0.5 vs. 23.2 ± 1.7%, n.s.), who were scheduled for heart transplantation or mechanical support implantation, were included in the study. A complex metabolomic and gene expression analysis of EAT obtained during surgery was performed.
    RESULTS: SGLT-2i ameliorated inflammation, as evidenced by the improved gene expression profile of pro-inflammatory genes in adipose tissue and decreased infiltration of immune cells into EAT. Enrichment of ether lipids with oleic acid noted on metabolomic analysis suggests a reduced disposition to ferroptosis, potentially further contributing to decreased oxidative stress in EAT of SGLT-2i treated subjects.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our results show decreased inflammation in EAT of patients with severe heart failure treated by SGLT-2i, as compared to patients with heart failure without this therapy. Modulation of EAT inflammatory and metabolic status could represent a novel mechanism behind SGLT-2i-associated cardioprotective effects in patients with heart failure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:可以从双序列首过灌注成像的动脉输入功能(AIF)图像中自动测量肺传输时间(PTT)。PTT已针对与心输出量和左心室充盈压(心力衰竭的重要预后标志物)相关的侵入性心导管插入进行了验证。我们假设延长的PTT与心力衰竭患者的临床结果相关。
    方法:我们招募了最近诊断为非缺血性心力衰竭的患者,其左心室射血分数(LVEF)<50%。随访患者的主要不良心血管事件(MACE)定义为全因死亡率的医疗记录,心力衰竭住院,室性心律失常,中风或心肌梗塞。在静息灌注成像期间,根据LV和RV的低分辨率AIF动态系列自动测量PTT。并且将PTT测量为左(LV)和右心室(RV)指示物稀释曲线的质心之间的时间(以秒为单位)。
    结果:对患者(N=294)进行了中位2.0年的随访,其中37例患者(12.6%)发生了至少一次MACE事件。在单变量Cox回归分析中,PTT与MACE之间存在显着关联(危险比(HR)1.16,95%置信区间(CI)1.08-1.25,P=0.0001)。PTT与心力衰竭住院之间也存在显着相关性(HR1.15,95%CI1.02-1.29,P=0.02),PTT与N末端B型利钠肽前体之间存在中度相关性(NT-proBNP,r=0.51,P<0.001)。调整临床和影像学因素后,PTT仍可预测MACE,但一旦调整NT-proBNP,则不再显着。
    结论:在近期发作的非缺血性心力衰竭患者的CMR灌注成像期间自动测量PTT可预测MACE,尤其是心力衰竭住院。以这种方式获得的PTT可能是心力衰竭中血液动力学充血的非侵入性标志物,并且需要进一步的研究来确定是否延长的PTT识别出可能需要更密切的随访或药物优化以降低未来不良事件的风险的那些人。
    BACKGROUND: Pulmonary transit time (PTT) can be measured automatically from arterial input function (AIF) images of dual sequence first-pass perfusion imaging. PTT has been validated against invasive cardiac catheterisation correlating with both cardiac output and left ventricular filling pressure (both important prognostic markers in heart failure). We hypothesized that prolonged PTT is associated with clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure.
    METHODS: We recruited outpatients with a recent diagnosis of non-ischaemic heart failure with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50% on referral echocardiogram. Patients were followed up by a review of medical records for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) defined as all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization, ventricular arrhythmia, stroke or myocardial infarction. PTT was measured automatically from low-resolution AIF dynamic series of both the LV and RV during rest perfusion imaging, and the PTT was measured as the time (in seconds) between the centroid of the left (LV) and right ventricle (RV) indicator dilution curves.
    RESULTS: Patients (N = 294) were followed-up for median 2.0 years during which 37 patients (12.6%) had at least one MACE event. On univariate Cox regression analysis there was a significant association between PTT and MACE (Hazard ratio (HR) 1.16, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-1.25, P = 0.0001). There was also significant association between PTT and heart failure hospitalisation (HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.02-1.29, P = 0.02) and moderate correlation between PTT and N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP, r = 0.51, P < 0.001). PTT remained predictive of MACE after adjustment for clinical and imaging factors but was no longer significant once adjusted for NT-proBNP.
    CONCLUSIONS: PTT measured automatically during CMR perfusion imaging in patients with recent onset non-ischaemic heart failure is predictive of MACE and in particular heart failure hospitalisation. PTT derived in this way may be a non-invasive marker of haemodynamic congestion in heart failure and future studies are required to establish if prolonged PTT identifies those who may warrant closer follow-up or medicine optimisation to reduce the risk of future adverse events.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    特发性心房颤动(AF)患者从仰卧位到站立位过渡期间的血液动力学反应尚未完全了解。本研究旨在分析特发性房颤患者在抬头倾斜试验期间发生的血液动力学变化。我们调查了40例房颤患者(12例房颤节律-AFr和28例窦性心律-AFsr)和38例非房颤对照的平头倾斜试验期间的血流动力学变化。与AFsr和非AF相比,AFr患者在站立后SVI降低减弱[ΔSVI,以mL/m2为单位:-1.3(-3.4至1.7)与-6.4(-17.3至-0.1)与-11.8(-18.7至-8.0),分别为;p<0.001]。AFr中的PVRI降低,但AFsr和非AF中的PVRI升高[ΔPVRI以达因为单位。seg.m2/cm5:-477(-1148至82.5)与131(-525至887)vs.357(-29到681),分别为;p<0.01]。同样,与非房颤患者相比,AFr患者在站立后也有更大的HR和更大的CI增加。对体位性挑战的血液动力学反应表明,房颤节律患者与恢复为窦性心律或健康对照者之间的适应差异。表征血流动力学表型可能与AF患者的个体化治疗相关。
    The hemodynamic response during the transition from the supine to standing position in idiopathic atrial fibrillation (AF) patients is not completely understood. This study aimed to analyze the hemodynamic changes that occur during the head-up tilt test in idiopathic AF patients. We investigated the hemodynamic changes during the head-up tilt test with impedance cardiography in 40 AF patients (12 with AF rhythm-AFr and 28 with sinus rhythm-AFsr) and 38 non-AF controls. Patients with AFr had attenuated SVI decrease after standing when compared to AFsr and non-AF [ΔSVI in mL/m2: -1.3 (-3.4 to 1.7) vs. -6.4 (-17.3 to -0.1) vs. -11.8 (-18.7 to -8.0), respectively; p < 0.001]. PVRI decreased in AFr but increased in AFsr and non-AF [ΔPVRI in dyne.seg.m2/cm5: -477 (-1148 to 82.5) vs. 131 (-525 to 887) vs. 357 (-29 to 681), respectively; p < 0.01]. Similarly, compared with non-AF patients, AFr patients also had a greater HR and greater CI increase after standing. The haemodynamic response to orthostatic challenge suggests differential adaptations between patients with AF rhythm and those reverted to sinus rhythm or healthy controls. Characterizing the hemodynamic phenotype may be relevant for the individualized treatment of AF patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号