BACKGROUND: Differences in radiation-induced lymphopenia and prognosis between methods of radiotherapy (RT) for brain metastases remain unclear.
METHODS: In this retrospective analysis of patients who underwent whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy (SRS/SRT) for brain metastases, baseline total lymphocyte count (TLC) data were obtained within 2 weeks before RT initiation. Follow-up TLC data were evaluated at 0-2, 2-4, and 4-8 weeks after RT completion. Persistent lymphopenia was defined as <800/μL at any time point.
RESULTS: Overall, 138 RT courses in 128 patients were eligible (94 WBRT; 44 SRS/SRT). In the WBRT courses, the median baseline TLC was 1325/μL (IQR: 923-1799). Follow-up TLC decreased significantly to 946/μL (626-1316), 992/μL (675-1291), and 1075/μL (762-1435) (p < 0.001). SRS/SRT courses showed no significant TLC decrease. Multivariate analysis revealed female sex, prior RT, baseline TLC < 800/μL, and WBRT use were significantly associated with persistent lymphopenia. In the WBRT group, overall survival was significantly different between those with and without persistent lymphopenia (median, 2.6 and 6.1 months; p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in survival in the SRS/SRT group (p = 0.60).
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests SRS/SRT might be preferable for lymphocyte preservation in brain metastasis patients.

The combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and radiotherapy has shown promise in the treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The present meta-analysis aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of combining radiotherapy (RT) ICIs for the treatment of metastatic NSCLC. PubMed, Google Scholar, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were searched for relevant articles up to February 1, 2023. Post-therapy outcomes such as progression-free survival (PFS), complete response, partial response (PR), progressive disease (PD), stable disease and adverse events (AEs) were analyzed. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software. A total of seven studies involving 682 patients were included (384 patients who received ICI + RT vs. RT and 298 patients who received ICI + RT vs. ICI alone). No significant difference in PFS was demonstrated between the ICI + RT group and the RT group (heterogeneity: χ2=2.35; df=1; P=0.13; I2=57% and test for overall effect: Z=0.10; P=0.92). Conversely, patients in the ICI alone group had significantly decreased PR rates (heterogeneity: Τ2=0.00; χ2=2.13; df=3; P=0.54; I2=0% and test for overall effect: Z=2.57; P=0.01) compared with patients in the ICI + RT group. The ICI + RT group also had significantly lower rates of PD (heterogeneity: Τ2=0.00; χ2=0.91; df=3; P=0.82; I2=0% and test for overall effect: Z=2.52; P=0.01) compared with the ICI alone group. Safety analysis revealed no significant difference between patients who received ICI + RT and those who received RT in terms of grade 1 or 2 AEs. In conclusion, the combination of ICIs + RT demonstrates promising efficacy and safety for patients with metastatic NSCLC. However, clinical trials that have tested this combination are lacking, which emphasizes the need for further research.

Juntendo University Hospital is the second hospital in Japan to start stereotactic brain irradiation using linear accelerator (LINAC) system. This report details the historical transition of stereotactic irradiation, progress of treatment technology, and change of treatment method from the beginning to the Juntendo University Hospital and Juntendo Nerima Hospital. The hospital changed the use of cobalt to the LINAC system when it was rebuilt in 1993. Total body irradiation treatment for leukemia had started around the same time. A year later, in 1994, the hospital used their LINAC systems to perform stereotactic head irradiation, otherwise known as pinpoint irradiation. In 2005, Juntendo University Nerima Hospital was opened and in September of the same year, radiation therapy using the latest model of LINAC system at that time was initiated. This was the first among all Juntendo hospitals to start intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT). In 2014, a second LINAC system for IMRT and IGRT was equipped at the Juntendo Hongo Hospital. In 2021, the LINAC systems of the Juntendo University Nerima Hospital were replaced after 15 years of usage. The new method of SRS was started using a latest LINAC systems. In this paper, I introduce the technique and progress of SRS that I have experienced mainly in Juntendo University.

UNASSIGNED: The aim of our study was to compare dosimetric aspects of three radioablation modalities - direct high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) and virtually planned stereotactic body radiation therapy performed on CyberKnife (SBRTck) and Elekta Versa HD LINAC (SBRTe) applied in patients with liver metastases.
UNASSIGNED: We selected 30 patients with liver metastases, who received liver interstitial HDR-BT and virtually prepared plans for SBRTck and SBRTe. In all the cases, the prescribed dose was a single fraction of 25 Gy. Treatment delivery time, doses delivered to PTV and organs at risk, as well as conformity indices, were calculated and compared.
UNASSIGNED: The longest median treatment delivery time was observed in SBRTck in contrast to HDR-BT and SBRTe which were significantly shorter and comparable. HDR-BT plans achieved better coverage of PTV (except for D98%) in contrast to SBRT modalities. Between both SBRT modalities, SBRTck plans resulted in better dose coverage in Dmean, D50%, and D90% values compared to SBRTe without difference in D98%. The SBRTe was the most advantageous considering the PCI and R100%. SBRTck plans achieved the best HI, while R50% value was comparable between SBRTe and SBRTck. The lowest median doses delivered to uninvolved liver volume (V5Gy, V9.1Gy) were achieved with HDR-BT, while the difference between SBRT modalities was insignificant. SBRT plans were better regarding more favourable dose distribution in the duodenum and right kidney, while HDR-BT achieved lower doses in the stomach, heart, great vessels, ribs, skin and spinal cord. There were no significant differences in bowel and biliary tract dose distribution between all selected modalities.
UNASSIGNED: HDR-BT resulted in more favourable dose distribution within PTVs and lower doses in organs at risk, which suggests that this treatment modality could be regarded as an alternative to other local ablative therapies in carefully selected patients\' with liver malignancies. Future studies should further address the issue of comparing treatment modalities in different liver locations and clinical scenarios.

UNASSIGNED: Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary ocular malignancy. We compared fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) with proton therapy, including toxicity risks for UM patients.
UNASSIGNED: For a total of 66 UM patients from a single center, SRT dose distributions were compared to protons using the same planning CT. Fourteen dose-volume parameters were compared in 2-Gy equivalent dose per fraction (EQD2). Four toxicity profiles were evaluated: maculopathy, optic-neuropathy, visual acuity impairment (Profile I); neovascular glaucoma (Profile II); radiation-induced retinopathy (Profile III); and dry-eye syndrome (Profile IV). For Profile III, retina Mercator maps were generated to visualize the geographical location of dose differences.
UNASSIGNED: In 9/66 cases, (14 %) proton plans were superior for all dose-volume parameters. Higher T stages benefited more from protons in Profile I, especially tumors located within 3 mm or less from the optic nerve. In Profile II, only 9/66 cases resulted in a better proton plan. In Profile III, better retina volume sparing was always achievable with protons, with a larger gain for T3 tumors. In Profile IV, protons always reduced the risk of toxicity with a median RBE-weighted EQD2 reduction of 15.3 Gy.
UNASSIGNED: This study reports the first side-by-side imaging-based planning comparison between protons and SRT for UM patients. Globally, while protons appear almost always better regarding the risk of optic-neuropathy, retinopathy and dry-eye syndrome, for other toxicity like neovascular glaucoma, a plan comparison is warranted. Choice would depend on the prioritization of risks.

UNASSIGNED: Evaluate effectiveness and safety of multiple HyperArc courses and patterns of progression in patients affected by BMs with intracranial progression.
UNASSIGNED: 56 patients were treated for 702 BMs with 197 (range 2-8) HyperArc courses in case of exclusive intracranial progression. Primary end-point was the overall survival (OS), secondary end-points were intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS), toxicity, local control (LC), neurological death (ND), and whole-brain RT (WBRT)-free survival. Site of progression was evaluated against isodoses levels (0, 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 10, 13, 15, 20, and 24 Gy.).
UNASSIGNED: The 1-year OS was 70 %, and the median was 20.8 months (17-36). At the univariate analysis (UVA) biological equivalent dose (BED) > 51.3 Gy and non-melanoma histology significantly correlated with OS. The median time to iPFS was 4.9 months, and the 1-year iPFS was 15 %. Globally, 538 new BMs occurred after the first HA cycle in patients with extracranial disease controlled. 96.4 % of them occurred within the isodoses range 0-7 Gy as follows: 26.6 % (0 Gy), 16.5 % (1 Gy), 16.5 % (2 Gy), 20.1 % (3 Gy), 13.1 % (5 Gy), 3.4 % (7 Gy) (p = 0.00). Radionecrosis occurred in 2 metastases (0.28 %). No clinical toxicity of grade 3 or higher occurred during follow-up. One- and 2-year LC was 90 % and 79 %, respectively. At the UVA BED > 70 Gy and non-melanoma histology were significant predictors of higher LC. The 2-year WBRT-free survival was 70 %. After a median follow-up of 17.4 months, 12 patients deceased by ND.
UNASSIGNED: Intracranical relapses can be safely and effectively treated with repeated HyperArc, with the aim to postpone or avoid WBRT. Diffuse dose by volumetric RT might reduce microscopic disease also at relatively low levels, potentially acting as a virtual CTV. Neurological death is not the most common cause of death in this population, which highlights the impact of extracranial disease on overall survival.

UNASSIGNED: The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) using the CyberKnife-M6 (CK-M6) with lung optimized treatment (LOT) module in patients with primary lung cancer and lung metastases.
UNASSIGNED: Forty-two lesions from 35 patients were treated between 2019 and 2022. Four-dimensional computed tomography images were obtained when the patients were in a free breathing modality. Tracking modality was selected prospectively according to the visibility of the target. The median prescribed dose was 48 Gy in four fractions (fx) (28 - 55 Gy/1- 7 fx). The median age was 68 years (47 - 82 years), and 43% of cases were adenocarcinoma. The median lesion size was 15 mm (6 - 36 mm).
UNASSIGNED: Complete, partial and stable responses were obtained as 26%, 62%, and 9.5% at a median of 2 months (1 - 6 months), and 35.5%, 47.5% and 5% at the 12th month evaluation, respectively. Grade 3 and higher toxicity was not observed in any case. The mean and 2-year overall survival (OS) was 31.5 months and 54%, and the local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) was 29.6 months and 51%, respectively. In univariate analysis, target lesion type, complete response (CR), and higher esophagus maximum dose were favorable factors for OS and LRFS (P < 0.05). The CR at 12th month evaluation remained significant in multivariate analysis in terms of OS (hazard ratio = 8.602, 95% confidence interval: 1.05 - 70.01; P = 0.044).
UNASSIGNED: A mean LRFS of 29.6 months and OS of 31.5 months were obtained in patients with primary and metastatic lung cancer. With a median treatment time of 25 min, motion-managed strategy with CK-M6-LOT-based SBRT is an effective, safe, and comfortable treatment method for lung cancer.

UNASSIGNED: Osteolytic spinal metastases (SM) have a higher risk of fracture. In this study we aim to confirm the remineralization of lytic SM after radiation therapy. Secondary the influence of SBRT compared to cEBRT and tumor type will be analyzed.
UNASSIGNED: A retrospective cohort study was performed.
UNASSIGNED: 87 patients, 100 SM were included. 29 received SBRT, 71 cEBRT. Most common primary tumors were breast (35 %), lung (26 %) and renal (11 %). Both cEBRT and SBRT resulted in a significant increase of bone mineral density (BMD) (83.76 HU ± 5.72 → 241.41 HU ± 22.58 (p < 0.001) and 82.45 ± 9.13 → 179.38 ± 47.83p = 0.026). There was a significant increase in absolute difference of BMD between the SM and reference vertebrae (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between SBRT and cEBRT. There was no increase of BMD in renal lytic SM after radiation therapy (pre-treatment: 85.96 HU ± 19.07; 3 m 92.00 HU ± 21.86 (p = 0.882); 6 m 92.06 HU ± 23.94 (p = 0.902); 9 m 70.44 HU ± 7.45 (p = 0.213); 12 m 98.08 HU ± 11.24 (p = 0.740)). In all other primary tumors, a significant increase of BMD after radiation therapy was demonstrated (p < 0,05).
UNASSIGNED: We conclude that the BMD of lytic SM increases significantly after radiation therapy. Lytic SM of primary renal tumors are the exception; there is no significant remineralization of renal lytic SM after radiation therapy. There is no benefit of SBRT over cEBRT in this remineralization. These findings should be taken into account when deciding on surgery in the potentially unstable group defined by the spinal instability neoplastic score.

UNASSIGNED: Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) in the treatment of choroidal melanoma (CM) may be indicated if the tumour is located close to the optic nerve or is unsuitable for a radiotherapeutic plaque. It is thought that the rate of visual decline and ocular sequelae with SRT is influenced by dose and location of radiation in relation to important visual structures. This study therefore aimed to look at these prognoses with respect to localisation and dose of radiation when treatment of CM with SRT occurs.
UNASSIGNED: A retrospective data analysis was conducted on all patients at Dunedin Hospital (DH) from August 2001 to May 2017 who were followed up for 4 years. SRT consisted of 50 Gy divided into five fractions over 5 days to tumours, with 2-mm treatment margins. The primary outcome measure was retention of functional vision - better than hand movements (HMs) within the treated eye. Secondary outcome measures included time to non-functional vision (HM or less) in relation to location, dose and tumour thickness, the presence of radiation retinopathy, local and metastatic tumour progression, enucleation, and disease-specific mortality.
UNASSIGNED: Seventy-five patients were identified in this study. Follow-up was incomplete in 10 patients, and 4 patients became deceased within the 4-year study period. Twenty-nine patients (48%) retained visual acuity (VA) better than HMs in the treated eye at 4 years, and thirty-two (52%) of patients did not. Calculated dose to the optic nerve and macula and proximity of the tumour to the optic nerve and macula were not statistically determinative of vision outcomes, although presenting VA was. Fifty-six per cent of patients developed radiation retinopathy involving the macula. The local progression, metastatic progression and enucleation rates were 4.6%, 6%, and 12.3%, representing 3, 4, and 8 patients, respectively.
UNASSIGNED: This study demonstrates that approximately half of patients treated with SRT can expect to maintain functional vision better than HM at 4 years. The rate of visual decline and final vision outcome are independent of location of the tumour in relation to the optic nerve and macula. While it affirms that SRT achieves high rates of local tumour control and eye retention, preservation of functional VA remains an unpredictable endpoint for individual cases and highlights the therapeutic challenge of this treatment modality.

Choroidal metastasis originating from renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) is rare. To the best of our knowledge, 31 cases of choroidal metastasis from RCC have been reported in the English literature as of January 31, 2024. Nevertheless, physicians need to be vigilant in recognizing this condition, as its progression impacts the quality of life (QOL) of affected patients. In Case 1, a 60-year-old male with a medical history of papillary RCC experienced a deterioration in visual acuity (VA) and was diagnosed with solitary choroidal metastasis. Subsequently, multiple metastases were identified, prompting the initiation of a combination therapy regimen consisting of pembrolizumab plus axitinib. Despite treatment, progression of choroidal metastasis and a further decline in VA were observed. The patient underwent stereotactic radiotherapy and experienced complete resolution of the choroidal metastasis, accompanied by a slight improvement in VA. In Case 2, a 76-year-old man presented with a renal tumor accompanied by lung metastases. He underwent nephrectomy, and the histological diagnosis was papillary RCC. We initiated combination therapy consisting of nivolumab plus cabozantinib. The patient experienced a decrease in VA during treatment. We identified extensive fine metastases scattered throughout the bilateral choroid. We administered axitinib, but the patient experienced bilateral blindness. Given the absence of established therapy for choroidal metastasis, it is crucial to maintain flexibility in treatment selection. Local or systemic approaches should be used as deemed appropriate for each individual case.