Stereotactic radiosurgery

立体定向放射外科
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在≥75岁(老年晚期)的患者中,缺乏立体定向放射外科(SRS)治疗前庭神经鞘瘤(VS)的结果数据。据报道,超过75岁的VS患者中约有39%在手术切除后出现严重的面神经麻痹。这项研究比较了≥75和65-74岁(早期老年)的VS患者在SRS后的治疗结果。
    在453例接受了VS伽玛刀SRS的患者中,年龄≥65岁156例。晚期和早期老年组包括35和121名患者,分别。中位肿瘤体积为4.4cc,中位辐射剂量为12.0Gy。
    晚期和早期老年组的中位随访时间分别为37和56个月,分别。在27例(88%)和95例(83%)患者中观察到肿瘤体积控制(P=0.78)。在晚期和早期老年组中,有2例(6%)和6例(6%)患者需要额外的手术(P=1.00),分别。在SRS之后的第60个月和第120个月,累积肿瘤控制率为87%,75%,85%,73%(P=0.81),而累积临床控制率为93%和87%,95%,89%(P=0.80),在晚期和早期老年群体中,分别。在早期老年群体中,两名患者出现面部疼痛,1人在SRS后出现面神经麻痹;晚期老年组没有不良反应(P=1.00).
    SRS对VS有效,对≥75岁的患者有益,因为它保留了面神经。
    UNASSIGNED: Treatment outcome data of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for vestibular schwannomas (VS) in patients ≥75 years (late elderly) are lacking. Approximately 39% of patients ≥75 years with VS were reported to experience severe facial palsy after surgical removal. This study compared the treatment outcomes post-SRS for VS between patients ≥75 and 65-74 years (early elderly).
    UNASSIGNED: Of 453 patients who underwent gamma knife SRS for VS, 156 were ≥65 years old. The late and early elderly groups comprised 35 and 121 patients, respectively. The median tumor volume was 4.4 cc, and the median radiation dose was 12.0 Gy.
    UNASSIGNED: The median follow-up periods were 37 and 56 months in the late and early elderly groups, respectively. Tumor volume control was observed in 27 (88%) and 95 (83%) patients (P = 0.78), while additional procedures were required in 2 (6%) and 6 (6%) patients (P = 1.00) in the late and early elderly groups, respectively. At the 60th and 120th months post-SRS, the cumulative tumor control rates were 87%, 75%, 85%, and 73% (P = 0.81), while the cumulative clinical control rates were 93% and 87%, 95%, and 89% (P = 0.80), in the late and early elderly groups, respectively. In the early elderly group, two patients experienced facial pain, and one experienced facial palsy post-SRS; there were no adverse effects in the late elderly group (both P = 1.00).
    UNASSIGNED: SRS is effective for VS and beneficial in patients ≥75 years old as it preserves the facial nerve.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:通过与两个成熟的SRS平台比较,评估ZAP-X立体定向放射外科(SRS)治疗单发脑转移瘤的剂量学特征。
    方法:回顾性选择13例接受Cyberknife(CK)G4治疗的单发脑转移患者。计划目标体积(PTV)的处方剂量为1-3分的18-24Gy。PTV体积范围从0.44到11.52cc。使用ZAP-X计划系统和伽玛刀(GK)ICON计划系统以相同的处方剂量和危险器官(OAR)约束对13名患者的治疗计划进行了重新检查。对于ZAP-X和CK,PTV的处方剂量均归一化为70%,而GK为50%。三组的剂量学参数包括计划特征(CI,GI,GSI,梁,MU,治疗时间),PTV(D2,D95,D98,Dmin,Dmean,覆盖范围),脑组织(体积100%-10%处方剂量照射V100%-V10%,Dmean)和其他OAR(Dmax,Dmean),对所有这些进行了比较和评价.读取所有数据并用MIMMaestro进行分析。进行了单因素方差分析或多样本弗里德曼秩和检验,其中p<0.05表示显著差异。
    结果:GK的TheCI明显低于ZAP-X和CK。关于平均值,ZAP-X的GI较低,GSI较高,但是三组之间没有显着差异。ZAP-X的MU明显低于CK,ZAP-X治疗时间的平均值明显短于CK。对于PTV,CK的D95、D98和目标覆盖率较高,GK的Dmin均值明显低于CK和ZAP-X。对于脑组织,ZAP-X显示从V100%到V20%的较小体积;V60%和V50%的统计结果显示ZAP-X和GK之间存在差异,而V40%和V30%在ZAP-X和其他两组之间显示显着差异;V10%和Dmean表明GK更好。不包括脑干的Dmax,右视神经和视交叉,所有其他OAR的平均值均小于1Gy。对于脑干,GK和ZAP-X有更好的保护,尤其是在最大剂量。
    结论:对于SRS治疗单发脑转移瘤,所有三个治疗装置,ZAP-X系统,CyberknifeG4系统,和GammaKnife系统,能满足临床治疗要求。新平台ZAP-X可以提供与赛波刀和伽玛刀相当甚至更好的高质量计划,ZAP-X具有一定的剂量优势,特别是具有更适形的剂量分布和更好的保护脑组织。随着ZAP-X系统的不断改进和升级,它们可能成为治疗脑转移瘤的新的SRS平台。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the dosimetric characteristics of ZAP-X stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for single brain metastasis by comparing with two mature SRS platforms.
    METHODS: Thirteen patients with single brain metastasis treated with CyberKnife (CK) G4 were selected retrospectively. The prescription dose for the planning target volume (PTV) was 18-24 Gy for 1-3 fractions. The PTV volume ranged from 0.44 to 11.52 cc.Treatment plans of thirteen patients were replanned using the ZAP-X plan system and the Gamma Knife (GK) ICON plan system with the same prescription dose and organs at risk (OARs) constraints. The prescription dose of PTV was normalized to 70% for both ZAP-X and CK, while it was 50% for GK. The dosimetric parameters of three groups included the plan characteristics (CI, GI, GSI, beams, MUs, treatment time), PTV (D2, D95, D98, Dmin, Dmean, Coverage), brain tissue (volume of 100%-10% prescription dose irradiation V100%-V10%, Dmean) and other OARs (Dmax, Dmean),all of these were compared and evaluated. All data were read and analyzed with MIM Maestro. One-way ANOVA or a multisample Friedman rank sum test was performed, where p < 0.05 indicated significant differences.
    RESULTS: The CI of GK was significantly lower than that of ZAP-X and CK. Regarding the mean value, ZAP-X had a lower GI and higher GSI, but there was no significant difference among the three groups. The MUs of ZAP-X were significantly lower than those of CK, and the mean value of the treatment time of ZAP-X was significantly shorter than that of CK. For PTV, the D95, D98, and target coverage of CK were higher, while the mean of Dmin of GK was significantly lower than that of CK and ZAP-X. For brain tissue, ZAP-X showed a smaller volume from V100% to V20%; the statistical results of V60% and V50% showed a difference between ZAP-X and GK, while the V40% and V30% showed a significant difference between ZAP-X and the other two groups; V10% and Dmean indicated that GK was better. Excluding the Dmax of the brainstem, right optic nerve and optic chiasm, the mean value of all other OARs was less than 1 Gy. For the brainstem, GK and ZAP-X had better protection, especially at the maximum dose.
    CONCLUSIONS: For the SRS treating single brain metastasis, all three treatment devices, ZAP-X system, CyberKnife G4 system, and GammaKnife system, could meet clinical treatment requirements. The newly platform ZAP-X could provide a high-quality plan equivalent to or even better than CyberKnife and Gamma Knife, with ZAP-X presenting a certain dose advantage, especially with a more conformal dose distribution and better protection for brain tissue. As the ZAP-X systems get continuous improvements and upgrades, they may become a new SRS platform for the treatment of brain metastasis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    要比较光子体积电弧治疗(VMAT)之间的计划质量,伽玛刀,和三种不同的质子束模式。
    计划使用三种不同质子斑点大小范围的回旋加速器产生的质子束,对20例患者的55个脑部病变进行了计划,CPB(光斑尺寸σ:2.7-7.0mm),直线加速器质子束,LPB(σ:2.9-5.5mm),和线性加速器质子微束,LPMBs(σ:0.9-3.9mm),有和没有孔,并与光子VMAT和伽玛刀计划进行比较。将每个质子和光子计划的每个损伤的剂量覆盖率设置为接收处方(Rx)剂量的GTV的99%。所有质子计划在稳健评估中使用±2mm的设置不确定度和±2%的范围不确定度,以实现GTV的V100%Rx>95%。将孔施用于照射与CPB生成的计划相比,对于LPB和LPMB计划,平均CI和GI显著更好.基于光圈的IMPT计划显示,所有剂量测定指标均优于伽玛刀。与非基于孔径的计划相比,基于孔径的IMT计划还显示出浅层肿瘤(d<2.5cm)的所有剂量学指标的改善。
    LPB和LPMB是CPB或光子疗法的出色替代品,可显着增加对正常组织的保存。
    UNASSIGNED: To compare plan quality among photon volumetric arc therapy (VMAT), Gamma Knife, and three different proton beam modalities.
    UNASSIGNED: Fifty-five brain lesions from 20 patients were planned with three different proton spot size ranges of cyclotron-generated proton beams, CPBs (spot size σ: 2.7-7.0 mm), linear accelerator proton beams, LPBs (σ: 2.9-5.5 mm), and linear accelerator proton minibeams, LPMBs (σ: 0.9-3.9 mm), with and without apertures and compared against photon VMAT and Gamma Knife plans. Dose coverage to each lesion for each proton and photon plan was set to 99% of the GTV receiving the prescription (Rx) dose. All proton plans used ±2 mm setup uncertainty and ±2% range uncertainty in robust evaluation to achieve V100%Rx > 95% of the GTV. Apertures were applied to proton beams irradiating tumors <1 cm3 volume and located <2.5 cm depth. Conformity index (CI), gradient index (GI), V12 Gy, V4.5 Gy, and mean brain dose were compared across all plan types. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was utilized to determine statistical significance of dosimetric results compared between photon and proton plans.
    UNASSIGNED: When compared to CPB generated plans, average CI and GI were significantly better for the LPB and LPMB plans. Aperture-based IMPT plans showed improvement from Gamma Knife for all dosimetric metrics. Aperture-based IMPT plans also showed improvement in all dosimetric metrics for shallow tumors (d < 2.5 cm) when compared with non-aperture-based plans.
    UNASSIGNED: The LPB and LPMB stand as excellent alternatives to CPB or photon therapy and significantly increase the preservation of normal tissue.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    怀孕期间的脑转移在管理中提出了复杂的难题。在这种情况下,立体定向放射外科(SRS)为临床医生提供了宝贵的选择。我们回顾并描述了伽玛刀(GK)SRS治疗妊娠28周时复发性乳腺癌患者孤立性小脑转移的安全性和有效性。经过多学科讨论,她同意在计划的足月分娩前对脑转移患者进行紧急单期GKSRS,并进行2个周期的3周紫杉醇化疗.在基于框架的治疗之前,在泡沫膝盖支撑的上部和下部放置剂量计的试验显示,辐射暴露分别为3.12mSv和1.06mSv。在39.7束时间内,使用24个等中心递送了50%等剂量的16Gy的处方剂量。治疗计划有98%的覆盖率,89%的选择性和2.98的梯度指数。在实际治疗期间,放置在子宫底和耻骨上区域(与胎儿头部位置一致)附近的剂量计记录为2.83mSv和0.27mSv,低于试验剂量计读数。患者成功完成SRS治疗,两个月后生下健康宝宝。间隔三个月的随访MRI显示病变的总分辨率。与其他SRS模式相比,GKSRS的颅外剂量最低。本报告和文献综述证实,GK是一种锋利而有效的,然而温和和安全的治疗妊娠脑转移患者。
    Brain metastases during pregnancy poses complex conundrum in management. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) offers valuable option to clinicians in this scenario. We reviewed and described the safety and effectiveness of Gamma Knife (GK) SRS in treating a solitary cerebellar metastasis in a patient with recurrent breast cancer at 28 weeks of gestation. Following multidisciplinary discussion, she consented for urgent single session GK SRS to the brain metastasis with 2 cycles of 3-weekly paclitaxel chemotherapy prior to planned delivery at term. Prior to the frame-based treatment, a trial run with dosimeters placed on the superior and inferior parts of foam knee support showed radiation exposure of 3.12 mSv and 1.06 mSv respectively. A prescription dose of 16 Gy at the 50% isodose was delivered using 24 isocentres over 39.7\' of beam on time. The treatment plan had 98% coverage, 89% selectivity and a gradient index of 2.98. Dosimeters placed near the uterine fundus and suprapubic region (consistent with location of fetal head) during the actual treatment recorded 2.83 mSv and 0.27 mSv, which is lower than the trial dosimeter readings. The patient successfully completed SRS treatment and gave birth to a healthy baby two months later. Follow-up MRI at three months interval showed total resolution of the lesion. GK SRS is known for the lowest extracranial dose compared to other SRS modalities. This report and literature review confirmed that GK is a sharp and effective, yet gentle and safe treatment for pregnant patients with brain metastases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    对质量和安全的期望是医疗保健所有领域的基本原则,最佳实践的基石是不断学习和不断改进的过程。对放射治疗计划进行独立审核和同行评审是确定过程或技术差距的重要机制,为了突出需要改进的地方,并纳入持续改进过程。在放射治疗领域,独立的认证计划存在于各个国家和/或专业领域,然而,很少有人专门关注专业程序,如放射外科或近距离放射治疗,尽管对此类计划提出了一些建议。在本手稿中,我们描述了基于国家/国际标准和指南的专门的SRS/SBRT认证计划。我们还提供了完成该计划的机构的匿名调查结果。
    The expectation of quality and safety is a fundamental tenet in all areas of healthcare, and a cornerstone of best practice is a process of continuous learning and continuous improvement. Independent audits and peer review of radiotherapy programs are an important mechanism for identifying process or technology gaps, for highlighting areas for improvement, and for incorporating within continuous improvement processes. In the field of radiotherapy, independent certification programs exist within various national and/or professional spheres, yet few focus specifically on specialty procedures such as radiosurgery or brachytherapy, despite several recommendations for such programs. In this manuscript we describe a specialized SRS/SBRT credentialing program founded on national/international standards and guidelines. We also present the results of an anonymous survey from institutions who have completed the program.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    精确靶向对于成功治疗三叉神经痛(TGN)的立体定向放射外科至关重要。我们调查了无框图像引导放射外科(IGRS)期间分数内6维校正对TGN患者疼痛结局的影响。
    回顾性研究了2009年至2013年通过无框IGRS治疗的35例TGN患者中的41组分数内矫正。对于每个IGRS,分数内6维移位在6个沙发角度进行。根据巴罗神经研究所(BNI)5分评分记录临床疼痛结果。分析疼痛缓解评分<2和≥2的患者之间的6维校正和绝对平移距离的关系。
    绝对平均横向,纵向,垂直平移位移为0.46±0.15mm,0.36±0.16mm和0.21±0.08mm,分别,97%的平移位移在0.7mm以内。绝对平均横向(节距),纵向(卷),垂直(偏航)旋转校正为0.33±0.24°,0.18±0.09°,和0.27±0.15°,分别,97%的旋转校正在0.6°以内。疼痛结局的中位随访时间为IGRS后26个月。疼痛缓解<2和≥2个BNI点的患者的平均计算绝对偏移,分别为0.228±0.008mm和0.259±0.007mm,分别。平移移位没有统计学上的显着差异,这两个患者组之间的旋转校正或绝对距离。
    我们的数据证明了用于TGN的无框架IGRS的高空间瞄准精度,仅具有标称分数内6维校正。
    UNASSIGNED: Precision targeting is crucial to successful stereotactic radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia (TGN). We investigated the impact of intra-fractional 6-dimensional corrections during frameless image-guided radiosurgery (IGRS) for pain outcome in TGN patients.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 41 sets of intra-fractional corrections from 35 patients with TGN treated by frameless IGRS from 2009 to 2013 were retrospectively studied. For each IGRS, the intra-fractional 6-dimensional shifts were conducted at 6 couch angles. Clinical pain outcome was recorded according the Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) 5-points score. The relationship in 6-dimensional corrections and absolute translational distances between patients with pain relief score points <2 versus ≥2 were analyzed.
    UNASSIGNED: The absolute mean lateral, longitudinal, and vertical translational shifts were 0.46 ± 0.15 mm, 0.36 ± 0.16 mm and 0.21 ± 0.08 mm, respectively, with 97% of translational shifts being within 0.7 mm. The absolute mean lateral (pitch), longitudinal (roll), and vertical (yaw) rotational corrections are 0.33 ± 0.24°, 0.18 ± 0.09°, and 0.27 ± 0.15°, respectively, with 97% of rotational corrections being within 0.6°. The median follow-up duration for pain outcome was 26 months after IGRS. The average calculated absolute shift for patients with pain relief <2 and ≥2 BNI points, were 0.228 ± 0.008 mm and 0.259 ± 0.007 mm, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the translational shifts, rotational corrections or absolute distances between these two patient groups.
    UNASSIGNED: Our data demonstrate high spatial targeting accuracy of frameless IGRS for TGN with only nominal intra-fraction 6-dimensional corrections.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Juntendo大学医院是日本第二家开始使用线性加速器(LINAC)系统进行立体定向脑照射的医院。本报告详细介绍了立体定向辐照的历史转变,处理技术的进步,以及从开始到准腾多大学医院和准腾多尼玛医院的治疗方法的改变。医院在1993年重建时将钴的使用更改为LINAC系统。白血病的全身放射治疗大约在同一时间开始。一年后,1994年,医院使用他们的LINAC系统进行立体定向头部照射,也称为精确辐照。2005年,Juntendo大学Nerima医院开业,同年9月,当时开始使用最新型的LINAC系统进行放射治疗。这是所有Juntendo医院中第一个开始进行调强放射治疗(IMRT)和图像引导放射治疗(IGRT)的医院。2014年,JuntendoHongo医院配备了第二个用于IMRT和IGRT的LINAC系统。2021年,Juntendo大学Nerima医院的LINAC系统在使用15年后被更换。SRS的新方法是使用最新的LINAC系统开始的。在本文中,我主要介绍了我在Juntendo大学经历的SRS技术和进展。
    Juntendo University Hospital is the second hospital in Japan to start stereotactic brain irradiation using linear accelerator (LINAC) system. This report details the historical transition of stereotactic irradiation, progress of treatment technology, and change of treatment method from the beginning to the Juntendo University Hospital and Juntendo Nerima Hospital. The hospital changed the use of cobalt to the LINAC system when it was rebuilt in 1993. Total body irradiation treatment for leukemia had started around the same time. A year later, in 1994, the hospital used their LINAC systems to perform stereotactic head irradiation, otherwise known as pinpoint irradiation. In 2005, Juntendo University Nerima Hospital was opened and in September of the same year, radiation therapy using the latest model of LINAC system at that time was initiated. This was the first among all Juntendo hospitals to start intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT). In 2014, a second LINAC system for IMRT and IGRT was equipped at the Juntendo Hongo Hospital. In 2021, the LINAC systems of the Juntendo University Nerima Hospital were replaced after 15 years of usage. The new method of SRS was started using a latest LINAC systems. In this paper, I introduce the technique and progress of SRS that I have experienced mainly in Juntendo University.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:这项多中心回顾性研究的目的是分析贝伐单抗(BV)对立体定向放疗(SRT)脑转移后放射性坏死(RN)的临床和放射学影响。
    方法:对在10个放射肿瘤中心治疗的40例SRT相关症状性脑RN患者进行分析。BV治疗的临床反应分类如下:完全(不需要额外的治疗),部分(需要类固醇或重复BV),反应迟钝(需要手术)。分析了10例患者的脑RN的放射学特征,这些患者在皮质类固醇和BV治疗后可进行系列MRI扫描。
    结果:BV在11例(27.5%)患者中用作一线治疗,在29例(72.5%)患者中用作二线治疗。在BV治疗后,77.5%的患者神经症状消退(45%完全缓解,32.5%部分响应)。使用皮质类固醇后,中位水肿体积从RN时的75.9cc(范围:5.9-125.8cc)增加到113.65cc(范围:1.5-382.1cc),代表39.8%的增长率(p=0.074)。然而,BV治疗后,水肿的中位体积降至19.5cc(范围:0-163.3cc),与RN相差62.2%(p=0.041)。
    结论:在皮质类固醇无反应的患者中,使用BV导致77.5%的临床反应率和良好的放射学反应。BV的作用应在前瞻性研究中进一步研究。
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this multicenter retrospective study was to analyze the clinical and radiological effects of bevacizumab (BV) on radionecrosis (RN) that developed after stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for brain metastasis.
    METHODS: Forty patients with SRT related symptomatic brain RN treated in 10 radiation oncology centers were analyzed. The clinical response to BV treatment was categorized as follows: complete (no additional treatment required), partial (requiring either steroids or repeat BV), and unresponsive (requiring surgery). The radiological features of brain RN were analyzed in 10 patients whose serial MRI scans were available after corticosteroid and BV treatments.
    RESULTS: BV was used as a first line treatment in 11 (27.5%) and as a second line treatment in 29 (72.5%) of patients. The neurological symptoms regressed in 77.5% of patients after treatment with BV (45% complete response, 32.5% partial response). The median edema volume increased from 75.9 cc (range: 5.9-125.8 cc) at RN to 113.65 cc (range: 1.5-382.1 cc) after use of corticosteroids, representing a rate of 39.8% increase (p = 0.074). However, after BV treatment the median volume of edema decreased to 19.5 cc (range: 0-163.3 cc) which represents a difference of 62.2% (p = 0.041) from RN.
    CONCLUSIONS: The use of BV caused clinical response rate of 77.5% and a good radiological response in corticosteroid unresponsive patients. The role of BV should be further investigated in prospective studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    多参数磁共振(mpMR)图像中的信息与体素水平的肿瘤对放射治疗(RT)的反应有关。我们已经研究了一个深度学习框架来预测(i)治疗后的mpMR图像和剂量图(“正向模型”),and,(ii)将在治疗后的mpMR图像(“逆模型”)上的总肿瘤体积(GTV)内产生规定的变化的RT剂量图,立体定向放射手术(SRS)治疗的乳腺癌脑转移(BCMB)。
    本地结果,规划计算机断层扫描(CT)图像,剂量图,以及处理前和处理后的水表观扩散系数(ADC)图,T1加权未增强(T1w)和对比度增强(T1wCE),收集了39例BCMB患者的T2加权(T2w)和液体衰减反转恢复(FLAIR)mpMR图像。将MPMR图像与计划CT共配准并进行强度校准。2Dpix2pix架构用于训练5个正向模型(ADC,T2w,FLAIR,T1w,T1wCE)和1个逆模型,对18例BCMB患者的1940个切片进行分析,并在另外9名BCMB患者的437个切片上进行了测试。
    GTV内5个正向模型的预测和地面实况后RT图像之间的均方根误差百分比(RMSPE),在含有GTV的136个测试片中,(平均值±SD)0.12±0.044(ADC),0.14±0.066(T2w),0.08±0.038(T1w),0.13±0.058(T1wCE),和0.09±0.056(FLAIR)。GTV内的RMSPE在相同的136个测试切片上,在预测和地面真实剂量图之间,逆模型为0.37±0.20。
    已经证明了一种基于深度学习的方法,用于BCMB的SRS中的放射学结果优化的剂量计划。
    UNASSIGNED: Information in multiparametric Magnetic Resonance (mpMR) images is relatable to voxel-level tumor response to Radiation Treatment (RT). We have investigated a deep learning framework to predict (i) post-treatment mpMR images from pre-treatment mpMR images and the dose map (\"forward models\"), and, (ii) the RT dose map that will produce prescribed changes within the Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) on post-treatment mpMR images (\"inverse model\"), in Breast Cancer Metastases to the Brain (BCMB) treated with Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS).
    UNASSIGNED: Local outcomes, planning computed tomography (CT) images, dose maps, and pre-treatment and post-treatment Apparent Diffusion Coefficient of water (ADC) maps, T1-weighted unenhanced (T1w) and contrast-enhanced (T1wCE), T2-weighted (T2w) and Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) mpMR images were curated from 39 BCMB patients. mpMR images were co-registered to the planning CT and intensity-calibrated. A 2D pix2pix architecture was used to train 5 forward models (ADC, T2w, FLAIR, T1w, T1wCE) and 1 inverse model on 1940 slices from 18 BCMB patients, and tested on 437 slices from another 9 BCMB patients.
    UNASSIGNED: Root Mean Square Percent Error (RMSPE) within the GTV between predicted and ground-truth post-RT images for the 5 forward models, in 136 test slices containing GTV, were (mean ± SD) 0.12 ± 0.044 (ADC), 0.14 ± 0.066 (T2w), 0.08 ± 0.038 (T1w), 0.13 ± 0.058 (T1wCE), and 0.09 ± 0.056 (FLAIR). RMSPE within the GTV on the same 136 test slices, between the predicted and ground-truth dose maps, was 0.37 ± 0.20 for the inverse model.
    UNASSIGNED: A deep learning-based approach for radiologic outcome-optimized dose planning in SRS of BCMB has been demonstrated.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号