Splenic injury

脾损伤
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    心肺复苏对于心肺骤停至关重要,但胸部按压的并发症需要监测.尽管肋骨和胸骨骨折很常见,腹部损伤很少见,脾损伤更罕见。
    一名74岁男子因出血性十二指肠溃疡进入急诊室。住院期间,患者因失血性休克导致心肺骤停.心肺复苏7分钟后自发循环恢复。他接受了经导管动脉栓塞术,以阻止十二指肠溃疡的出血。第二天,对患者进行性贫血的仔细检查显示脾损伤;经导管动脉栓塞术挽救了他的生命。
    在进行了适当的心肺复苏的心肺骤停患者中,重要的是要考虑脾损伤的并发症。一种可能的机制——尤其是在饱胃的患者中——是隔膜挤压脾脏,腹壁,和胃。
    UNASSIGNED: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation is essential for cardiopulmonary arrest, but complications from chest compressions warrant monitoring. Although rib and sternal fractures are common, abdominal injuries are rare, and splenic injuries are much rarer.
    UNASSIGNED: A 74-year-old man was admitted to the emergency room with a hemorrhagic duodenal ulcer. During hospitalization, the patient went into cardiopulmonary arrest due to hemorrhagic shock. Spontaneous circulation returned after 7 min of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. He underwent transcatheter arterial embolization to stop the bleeding from the duodenal ulcer. The next day, a close examination of the patient\'s progressive anemia revealed splenic injury; transcatheter arterial embolization was performed to save his life.
    UNASSIGNED: It is important to consider the complication of splenic injury in patients with cardiopulmonary arrest who have undergone appropriate cardiopulmonary resuscitation. A possible mechanism-especially in patients with a full stomach-is the squeezing of the spleen by the diaphragm, abdominal wall, and stomach.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    脾切除术是生命体征不稳定的患者治疗脾损伤的常用方法。经导管动脉栓塞(TAE)已成为脾切除术的有限替代方法,尽管TAE的作用可以随着生命体征的稳定而扩展。目前的病例报告讨论了一名50多岁的男子,在机动车事故后受到冲击,使用复苏性血管内球囊闭塞主动脉(REBOA)成功稳定,然后是脾动脉栓塞术(SAE)而不是脾切除术,早期参与诊断和介入放射科医生从初始阶段的护理。我们还讨论了REBOA下SAE的困难以及放射科医生早期参与创伤护理的重要性。
    Splenectomy is a common procedure for managing splenic injury in patients with unstable vital signs. Transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) has emerged as a limited alternative to splenectomy, although the role of TAE can be expanded upon the stabilization of vital signs. The current case report discusses a man in his 50s, in shock after a motor vehicle accident, who was successfully stabilized using resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA), followed by splenic artery embolization (SAE) instead of splenectomy, with early involvement of diagnostic and interventional radiologists from the initial stage of care. We also discuss the difficulties of SAE under REBOA and the significance of the early involvement of radiologists in trauma care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    传统上,血液动力学不稳定患者的脾破裂可以通过脾切除术来治疗。此病例报告讨论了非创伤性脾破裂的成功治疗。爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒(EBV)感染的一种罕见但危及生命的并发症,血液动力学不稳定的患者。病人,诊断为继发于EBV的传染性单核细胞增多症(IM),表现为严重的腹痛和晕厥发作。影像学显示美国创伤外科协会(AAST)III级脾损伤,随后在重复成像时升级为IV级损伤。病人的情况恶化,即使最初复苏,导致脾血管栓塞.手术成功,5天后患者出院。该病例强调了脾动脉栓塞术(SAE)在血液动力学不稳定的无创伤脾破裂患者中的疗效,特别是在有介入放射学资源的中心,提供脾切除术及其相关并发症的替代方案。
    Splenic rupture in haemodynamically unstable patients has traditionally been managed with splenectomy. This case report discusses the successful management of atraumatic splenic rupture, a rare but life-threatening complication of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection, in a hemodynamically unstable patient. The patient, diagnosed with infectious mononucleosis (IM) secondary to EBV, presented with severe abdominal pain and a syncopal episode. Imaging revealed an American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) grade III splenic injury, which was subsequently upgraded to a grade IV injury on repeat imaging. The patient\'s condition deteriorated even with initial resuscitation, leading to splenic angioembolization. The procedure was successful and the patient was discharged after 5 days. This case highlights the efficacy of splenic artery embolization (SAE) in haemodynamically unstable patients with atraumatic splenic rupture, particularly in centers with interventional radiology resources, offering an alternative to splenectomy and its associated complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    脾损伤是内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)极为罕见的并发症。到目前为止,文献中只有34例报告。根据一名72岁男子的案件,由于胆总管结石引起的ERCP后出现了大的脾周和包膜下血肿,我们对文献中发现的所有ERCP诱发的脾损伤病例进行了广泛回顾.我们搜索了截至2023年4月15日的PubMed/Medline和GoogleScholar,以获取已发布的病例报告和系列,使用以下术语:ERCP后脾损伤,ERCP诱导的脾损伤,和ERCP术后脾外伤.包括的病例报告是英文的,西班牙语,德国文学。我们试图讨论可能的临床图像,可用的诊断方法,潜在的治疗替代方案,以及与该实体相关的诱发因素。此外,讨论并示意性地支持了这种损伤的可能机制的理论。ERCP引起的脾损伤很少见,诊断需要高度怀疑。因此,我们提出了两种诊断算法,根据我们的意见,这可能有助于评估这种并发症,并导致早期准确的诊断和适当的治疗。总的来说,我们的研究结果支持,尽管ERCP引起的脾损伤是ERCP的意外/异常并发症,按照适当的步骤可以及时诊断和治疗。
    Splenic injury is an extremely rare complication of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). There are only 34 cases reported in the literature up to now. Based on a case of a 72-year-old man, who after ERCP due to choledocholithiasis developed a large perisplenic and subcapsular hematoma, we carried out an extensive review of all cases of ERCP-induced splenic injury found in the literature. We searched PubMed/Medline and Google Scholar till 15 April 2023, for published case reports and series using the following terms: splenic injury after ERCP, ERCP-induced splenic injury, and post-ERCP splenic trauma. The case reports included were in English, Spanish, and German literature. We attempt to discuss the possible clinical image, the available diagnostic methods, the potential treatment alternatives, and predisposing factors related to this entity. Furthermore, a theory of a possible mechanism of this injury is discussed and supported schematically. The ERCP-induced splenic injury is rare and a high index of suspicion is needed for diagnosis. Therefore, we present two diagnostic algorithms, which according to our opinion may assist the evaluation of this complication and lead to early accurate diagnosis and appropriate management. Collectively, our findings support that although ERCP-induced splenic injury is an unexpected/unusual complication of ERCP, following the proper steps can be timely diagnosed and treated.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:结肠镜检查引起的脾损伤很少见,但死亡率很高。虽然历史上保守治疗低度损伤或高度损伤脾切除术,脾动脉栓塞术的应用越来越广泛,反映了外部钝性创伤的现代治疗指南。本系统综述评估了已发表的结肠镜检查导致脾动脉栓塞治疗的脾损伤病例的结果。
    方法:对发表的有关结肠镜检查主要采用脾动脉栓塞治疗期间脾损伤的文章进行了系统评价,脾切除术,或从1977年到2022年的splenorrhy。数据点包括人口统计,既往手术史,结肠镜检查的适应症,延迟诊断,治疗,伤害等级,脾动脉栓塞位置,脾保存(抢救),和死亡率。
    结果:接受脾动脉栓塞治疗的30例患者平均年龄65岁(SD9),其中67%为女性,83%避免脾切除术和6.7%的死亡率。81%的脾动脉栓塞位于脾门近端。接受脾切除术治疗的163例患者平均年龄65岁(SD11),女性占66%,死亡率为5.5%。3例接受中位年龄60岁(范围59-70岁)的脾修补术的患者均避免了脾切除术,无死亡。脾动脉栓塞和脾切除术组之间的死亡率没有差异(p=0.81)。
    结论:脾动脉栓塞治疗结肠镜导致的脾损伤是一种有效的治疗选择。鉴于与脾切除术相比,脾挽救的已知益处,包括对被包裹的生物体保持免疫功能,低成本,住院时间缩短,对于合适的患者,应将栓塞纳入结肠镜检查引起的脾损伤的治疗途径。
    Splenic injury due to colonoscopy is rare, but has high mortality. While historically treated conservatively for low-grade injuries or with splenectomy for high-grade injuries, splenic artery embolisation is increasingly utilised, reflecting modern treatment guidelines for external blunt trauma. This systematic review evaluates outcomes of published cases of splenic injury due to colonoscopy treated with splenic artery embolisation.
    A systematic review was performed of published articles concerning splenic injury during colonoscopy treated primarily with splenic artery embolisation, splenectomy, or splenorrhaphy from 1977 to 2022. Datapoints included demographics, past surgical history, indication for colonoscopy, delay to diagnosis, treatment, grade of injury, splenic artery embolisation location, splenic preservation (salvage), and mortality.
    The 30 patients treated with splenic artery embolisation were of mean age 65 (SD 9) years and 67% female, with 83% avoiding splenectomy and 6.7% mortality. Splenic artery embolisation was proximal to the splenic hilum in 81%. The 163 patients treated with splenectomy were of mean age 65 (SD 11) years and 66% female, with 5.5% mortality. Three patients treated with splenorrhaphy of median age 60 (range 59-70) years all avoided splenectomy with no mortality. There was no difference in mortality between splenic artery embolisation and splenectomy cohorts (p = 0.81).
    Splenic artery embolisation is an effective treatment option in splenic injury due to colonoscopy. Given the known benefits of splenic salvage compared to splenectomy, including preserved immune function against encapsulated organisms, low cost, and shorter hospital length of stay, embolisation should be incorporated into treatment pathways for splenic injury due to colonoscopy in suitable patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    非手术治疗(NOM)是血液动力学稳定的钝性脾损伤(BSI)的标准治疗方法。然而,NOM失败是发病率和死亡率的重要来源。我们开发了BSI中NOM失败的临床风险评分系统。
    分析了2008年至2018年日本创伤数据库的数据。符合条件的患者仅限于接受高级别BSI(器官损伤量表≥3)的NOM患者。主要结果是基于风险估计的NOM失败的预测评分。
    本分析包括1651例患者,其中110例(6.7%)患者出现NOM失败.多变量分析确定了与失败的NOM相关的七个变量:收缩压,格拉斯哥昏迷量表,伤害严重程度评分,其他伴随的腹部损伤,骨盆损伤,高档BSI,和血管栓塞。开发了一个8分的预测评分,其截止值大于5分(特异性,98.2%;灵敏度,25.5%),曲线下面积为0.81。
    临床预测评分具有良好的预测NOM失败的能力,可能有助于外科医生为BSI做出更好的决策。
    UNASSIGNED: Nonoperative management (NOM) is the standard treatment for hemodynamically stable blunt splenic injury (BSI). However, NOM failure is a significant source of morbidity and mortality. We developed a clinical risk scoring system for NOM failure in BSI.
    UNASSIGNED: Data from the Japanese Trauma Data Bank from 2008 to 2018 were analyzed. Eligible patients were restricted to those who underwent NOM with high-grade BSI (Organ Injury Scale ≥3). The primary outcome was a predictive score for NOM failure based on risk estimation.
    UNASSIGNED: There were 1651 patients included in this analysis, among whom 110 (6.7%) patients had NOM failure. Multivariate analysis identified seven variables associated with failed NOM: systolic blood pressure, Glasgow coma scale, Injury Severity Score, other concomitant abdominal injury, pelvic injury, high-grade BSI, and angioembolization. An eight-point predictive score was developed with a cut-off of greater than 5 points (specificity, 98.2%; sensitivity, 25.5%) with an area under the curve of 0.81.
    UNASSIGNED: The clinical predictive score had good ability to predict NOM failure and may help surgeons to make better decisions for BSI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    脾脏是腹部钝性外伤后最受伤的器官之一。管理选项可以是手术或非手术管理(NOM),包括保守管理或脾动脉栓塞。在急诊科实施CT允许使用CT成像作为早期决策的主要筛查工具。连续,新的脾损伤评分系统,如建立CT严重程度指数(CTSI).
    本研究的主要目的是评估CTSI评分系统对1级创伤中心8年钝性脾外伤患者的管理决策和预后的影响。
    这是一项回顾性研究,包括所有原发性脾外伤的成年患者,患有NOM,并在2013年至2021年期间入院。
    对99名患者进行了分析。平均样本年龄为32.7±12.3岁。共有(63/99)例患者有脾实质损伤,但无脾血管损伤。CTSI3级损伤与迟发性脾血管损伤的发展之间存在统计学上的显著关联(p<0.05)。初始CTSI评分的严重程度与NOM/临床失败的风险之间存在关联(p=0.02)。
    我们的研究结果表明,在1级创伤中心实施这种系统将进一步改善脾钝性创伤的治疗结果。然而,CTSI3级被认为是NOM失败的风险增加,需要进一步调查以规范其管理。
    UNASSIGNED: The spleen is one of the most injured organs following blunt abdominal trauma. The management options can be either operative or non-operative management (NOM) with either conservative management or splenic artery embolization. The implementation of CT in emergency departments allowed the use of CT imaging as a primary screening tool in early decision-making. Consecutively, new splenic injury scoring systems, such as the CT severity index (CTSI) reported was established.
    UNASSIGNED: The main aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of the implementation of CTSI scoring system on the management decision and outcomes in patients with blunt splenic trauma over 8 years in a level 1 trauma center.
    UNASSIGNED: This is a retrospective study including all adult patients with primary splenic trauma, having NOM and admitted to our hospital between 2013 and 2021.
    UNASSIGNED: The analyses were conducted on ninety-nine patients. The average sample age was 32.7 ± 12.3 years old. A total of (63/99) patients had splenic parenchyma injury without splenic vascular injury. There is a statistically significant association between CTSI grade 3 injury and the development of delayed splenic vascular injury (p < 0.05). There is an association between severity of initial CTSI score and the risk of NOM/clinical failure (p = 0.02).
    UNASSIGNED: Our findings suggest implementing such a system in a level 1 trauma center will further improve the outcome of treatment for splenic blunt trauma. However, CTSI grade 3 is considered an increased risk of NOM failure, and further investigations are necessary to standardize its management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:道路交通事故是全球最大的死亡原因。由腹部钝性外伤引起的大多数腹内损伤已经通过手术治疗了很长时间。在过去的几十年里,保守治疗作为腹部闭合性创伤的治疗选择,已经越来越受欢迎和有效。
    目的:确定闭合性腹部创伤脾损伤患者保守治疗的疗效。
    方法:本研究包括2021年6月至2022年12月在Hayatabad医疗综合体白沙瓦普外科非手术治疗的62例腹部闭合性创伤患者。
    结果:47例(75.8%)患者腹腔积血最少,11例(17.7%)出现中度腹膜积血,4例(6.4%)患者腹部无游离液。研究患者中没有大量的腹膜积血。在研究期间未观察到重大并发症。只有7例(11.3%)患者出现少量胸腔积液,而2例(3.2%)患者出现脾脓肿。仅在1例(1.6%)病例中观察到死亡率。
    结论:保守治疗是一种安全有效的策略,应被视为所有钝性脾损伤血流动力学稳定患者的一线治疗方法。
    BACKGROUND: Road traffic accidents are the greatest cause of death worldwide. Most intra-abdominal injuries caused by blunt abdominal trauma have been treated surgically for a very long period. Over the past few decades, conservative care has gained in popularity and effectiveness as a treatment choice for blunt abdominal trauma.
    OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of conservative management in patients suffering from splenic injury in blunt abdominal trauma.
    METHODS: The study included 62 cases of blunt abdominal trauma treated non-operatively in the general surgery department of the Hayatabad Medical Complex Peshawar between June 2021 and December 2022.
    RESULTS: Minimal hemoperitoneum was observed in 47 (75.8%) cases, moderate hemoperitoneum was noted in 11 (17.7%) cases, and 4 (6.4%) patients didn\'t have free fluid in the abdomen. There was no massive hemoperitoneum among the study patients. No major complications were observed during the study period. Only 7 (11.3%) cases develop minimal pleural effusion while 2 (3.2%) patients developed splenic abscess. Mortality was observed in only 1 (1.6%) case.
    CONCLUSIONS: Conservative management is a safe and efficient strategy and should be considered as a first line of treatment for all hemodynamically stable patients who suffered blunt splenic injury.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    结肠镜检查是结肠癌筛查的常用方法。虽然并发症很少见,最近有与结肠镜检查相关的脾损伤的报道。其原因尚不清楚。在这里,我们报道了一名84岁的男性患者,他接受了结肠镜检查以进行年度常规检查.结肠镜检查由于环形成而具有中等难度并且花费约50分钟。检查结束后,他得了晕厥,出汗,和低血压的腹胀。平扫计算机断层扫描显示腹水,患者在密切监测下住院。第二天,他的血红蛋白水平降低了约3.0g/dL.对比增强计算机断层扫描显示脾损伤。患者血流动力学稳定,接受保守治疗。脾损伤是结肠镜检查的罕见并发症;然而,它可能导致血流动力学不稳定。进行结肠镜检查的医生应该意识到这种潜在的并发症。
    Colonoscopy is a common procedure for screening of colon cancer. Although complications are rare, recently there have been reports of splenic injury associated with colonoscopy. Its causes are not clear. Herein, we report an 84-year-old man who underwent a colonoscopy for an annual routine examination. The colonoscopy was performed with moderate difficulty due to loop formation and took about 50 min. After the examination, he developed syncope, sweating, and abdominal distention with low blood pressure. Plain computed tomography revealed ascites, and the patient was hospitalized with close monitoring. The following day, his hemoglobin level was decreased by about 3.0 g/dL. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed the splenic injury. The patient was hemodynamically stable and was treated conservatively. Splenic injury is an uncommon complication of colonoscopy; however, it may cause hemodynamic instability. Physicians performing colonoscopies should be aware of this potential complication.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    Splenic injury is a potentially fatal injury if left undetected or untreated. Although most splenic injuries result from a traumatic event, it is important to consider if one\'s history (past or present) increases their risk for splenic injury (i.e., splenomegaly). We present a case regarding a school-age child who presented to the Emergency Department (ED) with abdominal pain following a ground-level fall onto a carpeted stair step. Prior to this injury, the patient had cold-like symptoms for 3 months that were treated solely with supportive care by their pediatrician(s). A transferring hospital\'s abdominal CT imaging revealed a grade III splenic laceration. The patient was monitored in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) by way of serial abdominal examinations, vitals, and labs. When the patient was cleared for discharge, it was recommended to refrain from strenuous activity for 1-2 months due to the risk of repeat splenic injury. Post-discharge, the patient\'s Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) serology returned and was consistent with a past infection which was an inconclusive finding. Although trauma is most commonly the culprit of splenic injuries, it is important to keep differentials broad when considering causes of splenomegaly as this may allow healthcare providers to potentially prevent injury/provide appropriate management post-injury and guide return-to-play recommendations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号