Sensitivity and specificity

灵敏度和特异性
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    研究宏基因组下一代测序(mNGS)在检测先前抗生素暴露的关节感染(JI)滑液(SF)样品中病原体的诊断价值。
    从2019年1月到2022年1月,纳入了59例疑似JI病例。所有病例在样本采集前2周内均有抗生素暴露。在SF样品上进行mNGS和常规培养。根据病史和临床症状并结合MSIS标准诊断JI。诊断价值,包括灵敏度,特异性,阳性/阴性预测值(PPV/NPV),和准确性,与MNGS和培养进行了比较。
    59例中有47例确诊为JI,其余12人被诊断患有非传染性疾病。mNGS的灵敏度为68.1%,显著高于培养(25.5%,p<0.01)。与39.0%的培养物相比,mNGS的准确度在71.2%显著更高(p<0.01)。通过mNGS但未通过微生物培养检测到11株病原菌,其中包括Lugdunensis葡萄球菌,cohnii葡萄球菌,Finegoldiamagna,粪肠球菌,腐生葡萄球菌,大肠杆菌,肠沙门氏菌,铜绿假单胞菌,皮氏不动杆菌,布鲁氏菌,和柯西拉。根据32例(68.1%)患者的mNGS结果调整了抗生素治疗,包括12名(25.5%)和20名(42.6%)患者,治疗升级和改变的人,分别。所有JI患者均接受手术并接受随后的抗生素治疗。术后随访20-27个月,平均23个月,治疗成功率为89.4%。在33名病原体阳性结果的患者中,再次手术1例(3.03%),在14例mNGS和培养结果均为阴性的病例中,再次手术4例(28.6%)。
    mNGS在检测先前接受抗生素治疗的JI患者的SF样本中的病原体方面比常规培养具有优势,有可能改善临床结果。
    UNASSIGNED: To investigate the diagnostic value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in detecting pathogens from joint infection (JI) synovial fluid (SF) samples with previous antibiotic exposure.
    UNASSIGNED: From January 2019 to January 2022, 59 cases with suspected JI were enrolled. All cases had antibiotic exposure within 2 weeks before sample collection. mNGS and conventional culture were performed on SF samples. JI was diagnosed based on history and clinical symptoms in conjunction with MSIS criteria. The diagnostic values, including sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative predictive values (PPV/NPV), and accuracy, were in comparison with mNGS and culture.
    UNASSIGNED: There were 47 of the 59 cases diagnosed with JI, while the remaining 12 were diagnosed with non-infectious diseases. The sensitivity of mNGS was 68.1%, which was significantly higher than that of culture (25.5%, p<0.01). The accuracy of mNGS was significantly higher at 71.2% compared to the culture at 39.0% (p <0.01). Eleven pathogenic strains were detected by mNGS but not by microbiological culture, which included Staphylococcus lugdunensis, Staphylococcus cohnii, Finegoldia magna, Enterococcus faecalis, Staphylococcus saprophytics, Escherichia coli, Salmonella enterica, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter pittii, Brucella ovis, andCoxiella burnetii. Antibiotic therapy was adjusted based on the mNGS results in 32 (68.1%) patients, including 12 (25.5%) and 20 (42.6%) patients, in whom treatment was upgraded and changed, respectively. All JI patients underwent surgery and received subsequent antibiotic therapy. They were followed up for an average of 23 months (20-27 months), and the success rate of treatment was 89.4%. Out of the 33 patients who had positive results for pathogens, reoperation was performed in 1 case (3.03%), while out of the 14 cases with negative results for both mNGS and cultures, reoperation was performed in 4 cases (28.6%).
    UNASSIGNED: mNGS has advantages over conventional culture in detecting pathogens in SF samples from JI patients previously treated with antibiotics, potentially improving clinical outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:宏基因组学是检测未知和新型病原体的强大方法。基于Illumina短读测序的工作流程正在诊断实验室中建立。然而,高测序深度要求,较长的周转时间,有限的敏感性阻碍了更广泛的采用。我们调查了我们是否可以使用基于牛津纳米孔技术(ONT)的非靶向测序的方案克服这些限制,提供实时数据采集和分析,或者有针对性的小组方法,这允许对已知病原体进行选择性测序,并可以提高灵敏度。
    方法:我们使用Illumina和ONT评估了现有的非靶向宏基因组工作流程对病毒的检测,以及使用Twist生物科学综合病毒研究小组(CVRP)的基于Illumina的富集方法,针对3153种病毒。我们测试了由人类DNA/RNA背景下的六病毒模拟群落的稀释系列组成的样本,设计类似于具有低微生物丰度和高宿主含量的临床标本。方案旨在保留宿主转录组,因为这可以帮助确认没有感染因子。我们进一步比较了常用分类分类器的性能。
    结果:用TwistCVRP捕获比非靶向测序至少增加10-100倍的灵敏度,使其适用于低病毒载量的检测(60基因组拷贝每毫升(gc/ml)),但在诊断环境中可能需要其他方法来检测非靶向生物。虽然未靶向的ONT在高病毒载量(60,000gc/ml)下具有良好的敏感性,在较低的病毒载量(600-6000gc/ml),需要更长和更昂贵的测序运行才能达到与非靶向Illumina方案相当的灵敏度.非靶向ONT比非靶向Illumina测序提供更好的特异性。然而,在分类分类器之间应用鲁棒阈值标准化结果。宿主基因表达分析对于非靶向Illumina测序是最佳的,但对于CVRP和ONT都是可能的。
    结论:宏基因组学有可能成为诊断的标准治疗方法,并且是发现新出现的病原体的有力工具。非靶向Illumina和ONT宏基因组学以及使用TwistCVRP捕获在灵敏度方面具有不同的优势,特异性,周转时间和成本,最佳方法将取决于临床情况。
    BACKGROUND: Metagenomics is a powerful approach for the detection of unknown and novel pathogens. Workflows based on Illumina short-read sequencing are becoming established in diagnostic laboratories. However, high sequencing depth requirements, long turnaround times, and limited sensitivity hinder broader adoption. We investigated whether we could overcome these limitations using protocols based on untargeted sequencing with Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT), which offers real-time data acquisition and analysis, or a targeted panel approach, which allows the selective sequencing of known pathogens and could improve sensitivity.
    METHODS: We evaluated detection of viruses with readily available untargeted metagenomic workflows using Illumina and ONT, and an Illumina-based enrichment approach using the Twist Bioscience Comprehensive Viral Research Panel (CVRP), which targets 3153 viruses. We tested samples consisting of a dilution series of a six-virus mock community in a human DNA/RNA background, designed to resemble clinical specimens with low microbial abundance and high host content. Protocols were designed to retain the host transcriptome, since this could help confirm the absence of infectious agents. We further compared the performance of commonly used taxonomic classifiers.
    RESULTS: Capture with the Twist CVRP increased sensitivity by at least 10-100-fold over untargeted sequencing, making it suitable for the detection of low viral loads (60 genome copies per ml (gc/ml)), but additional methods may be needed in a diagnostic setting to detect untargeted organisms. While untargeted ONT had good sensitivity at high viral loads (60,000 gc/ml), at lower viral loads (600-6000 gc/ml), longer and more costly sequencing runs would be required to achieve sensitivities comparable to the untargeted Illumina protocol. Untargeted ONT provided better specificity than untargeted Illumina sequencing. However, the application of robust thresholds standardized results between taxonomic classifiers. Host gene expression analysis is optimal with untargeted Illumina sequencing but possible with both the CVRP and ONT.
    CONCLUSIONS: Metagenomics has the potential to become standard-of-care in diagnostics and is a powerful tool for the discovery of emerging pathogens. Untargeted Illumina and ONT metagenomics and capture with the Twist CVRP have different advantages with respect to sensitivity, specificity, turnaround time and cost, and the optimal method will depend on the clinical context.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:下一代测序(NGS)方法彻底改变了肠道微生物组研究,可以提供菌株水平的分辨率,但是这些技术有局限性,因为它们只是半定量的,患有高检测限,并生成组成数据。本研究旨在系统地比较定量PCR(qPCR)和液滴数字PCR(ddPCR),以绝对定量人类粪便样品中的罗伊利氏杆菌菌株,并开发用于粪便样品中细菌菌株绝对定量的优化方案。
    结果:使用罗伊氏乳杆菌17938的菌株特异性PCR引物,ddPCR显示出略好的可重复性,但当使用基于试剂盒的DNA分离方法时,qPCR几乎是可重复的,并且显示出相当的灵敏度(检测限[LOD]约为104细胞/g粪便)和线性(R2>0.98).qPCR进一步具有更宽的动态范围并且更便宜和更快。基于这些发现,我们得出的结论是,qPCR在粪便样品中细菌菌株的绝对定量方面比ddPCR具有优势。我们为菌株特异性qPCR测定的设计提供了优化且易于遵循的分步方案,从基因组序列的引物设计到PCR系统的校准。验证该方案以设计两种罗伊氏乳杆菌菌株的PCR测定,PB-W1和DSM20016T,导致高度准确的qPCR,在加标粪便样品中的检测极限约为103个细胞/g粪便。将我们的菌株特异性qPCR测定法应用于从人体试验期间接受活罗伊氏乳杆菌PB-W1或DSM20016T的人类受试者收集的粪便样品,证明了这两种菌株的高度准确的定量和灵敏的检测。与NGS方法(16SrRNA基因测序和整个宏基因组测序)相比,LOD低得多,动态范围更广。
    结论:根据我们的分析,我们认为采用基于试剂盒的DNA提取的qPCR是在粪便样品中在菌株水平上准确定量肠道细菌的最佳方法.所提供的分步方案将允许科学家设计高度敏感的菌株特异性PCR系统,以准确定量不仅罗伊氏乳杆菌的细菌菌株,而且还广泛的应用和样品类型中的其他细菌分类群。视频摘要。
    BACKGROUND: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) approaches have revolutionized gut microbiome research and can provide strain-level resolution, but these techniques have limitations in that they are only semi-quantitative, suffer from high detection limits, and generate data that is compositional. The present study aimed to systematically compare quantitative PCR (qPCR) and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) for the absolute quantification of Limosilactobacillus reuteri strains in human fecal samples and to develop an optimized protocol for the absolute quantification of bacterial strains in fecal samples.
    RESULTS: Using strain-specific PCR primers for L. reuteri 17938, ddPCR showed slightly better reproducibility, but qPCR was almost as reproducible and showed comparable sensitivity (limit of detection [LOD] around 104 cells/g feces) and linearity (R2 > 0.98) when kit-based DNA isolation methods were used. qPCR further had a wider dynamic range and is cheaper and faster. Based on these findings, we conclude that qPCR has advantages over ddPCR for the absolute quantification of bacterial strains in fecal samples. We provide an optimized and easy-to-follow step-by-step protocol for the design of strain-specific qPCR assays, starting from primer design from genome sequences to the calibration of the PCR system. Validation of this protocol to design PCR assays for two L. reuteri strains, PB-W1 and DSM 20016 T, resulted in a highly accurate qPCR with a detection limit in spiked fecal samples of around 103 cells/g feces. Applying our strain-specific qPCR assays to fecal samples collected from human subjects who received live L. reuteri PB-W1 or DSM 20016 T during a human trial demonstrated a highly accurate quantification and sensitive detection of these two strains, with a much lower LOD and a broader dynamic range compared to NGS approaches (16S rRNA gene sequencing and whole metagenome sequencing).
    CONCLUSIONS: Based on our analyses, we consider qPCR with kit-based DNA extraction approaches the best approach to accurately quantify gut bacteria at the strain level in fecal samples. The provided step-by-step protocol will allow scientists to design highly sensitive strain-specific PCR systems for the accurate quantification of bacterial strains of not only L. reuteri but also other bacterial taxa in a broad range of applications and sample types. Video Abstract.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:鼻咽癌(NPC)诊断相对较晚,预后较差,需要早期检测以减轻疾病负担。这项诊断测试准确性荟萃分析评估了9个EBV相关IgA抗体组(EBNA1-IgA,VCA-IgA,EA-IgA,Zta-IgA,EBNA1-IgA+VCA-IgA,VCA-IgA+EA-IgA,VCA-IgA+Rta-IgG,EBNA1-IgA+VCA-IgA+Zta-IgA和VCA-IgA+EA-IgA+Rta-IgG),旨在为NPC筛查确定合适的血清学检测生物标志物。
    方法:PubMed,Embase,从1月1日起检索中国国家知识基础设施和中国生物医学文献数据库,2000年9月30日,2023年,关键词是鼻咽癌,IgA,筛选,早期发现,早期诊断,敏感性和特异性。包括有关血清EBV相关IgA抗体组对NPC的诊断价值的文章。研究选择,数据提取,质量评估由两名研究人员独立进行,在分歧的情况下,咨询了第三位研究人员。使用双变量模型进行统计分析。通过诊断准确性研究质量评估工具(QUADAS-2)评估纳入研究的质量。
    结果:共包括70篇文章,涉及11863例NPC病例和34995例对照。在9个EBV相关的IgA抗体组中,EBNA1-IgA+VCA-IgA[0.928(0.898,0.950)],VCA-IgA+Rta-IgG[0.925(0.890,0.949)],EBNA1-IgA+VCA-IgA+Zta-IgA[0.962(0.909,0.985)]和VCA-IgA+EA-IgA+Rta-IgG[0.945(0.918,0.964)]表现出更高的合并敏感性(95CI)。就诊断优势比(DOR)(95CI)而言,EBNA1-IgA+VCA-IgA[107.647(61.173,189.430)],VCA-IgA+Rta-IgG[105.988(60.118,186.857)]和EBNA1-IgA+VCA-IgA+Zta-IgA[344.450(136.351,870.153)]表现优越。此外,EBNA1-IgA+VCA-IgA和VCA-IgA+Rta-IgG的SROC曲线更有利。然而,检测到VCA-IgA(P=0.005)和EBNA1-IgA+VCA-IgA(P=0.042)的发表偏倚.
    结论:一般来说,血清EBNA1-IgA的平行检测,使用ELISA的VCA-IgA和Zta-IgA抗体在所研究的组中显示出更好的合并敏感性和DOR。在使用较少的指标的情况下,血清VCA-IgA和EBNA1-IgA/Rta-IgG抗体组表现出相当的性能。
    背景:系统评论国际前瞻性注册登记号:CRD42023426984,注册于2023年5月28日。
    BACKGROUND: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is diagnosed relatively late and has a poor prognosis, requiring early detection to reduce the disease burden. This diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis evaluated the serological diagnostic value of nine EBV-related IgA antibody panels (EBNA1-IgA, VCA-IgA, EA-IgA, Zta-IgA, EBNA1-IgA + VCA-IgA, VCA-IgA + EA-IgA, VCA-IgA + Rta-IgG, EBNA1-IgA + VCA-IgA + Zta-IgA and VCA-IgA + EA-IgA + Rta-IgG), aiming to identify suitable serological detection biomarkers for NPC screening.
    METHODS: PubMed, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Chinese BioMedical Literature Database were searched from January 1st, 2000 to September 30th, 2023, with keywords nasopharyngeal carcinoma, IgA, screening, early detection, early diagnosis, sensitivity and specificity. Articles on the diagnostic value of serum EBV-related IgA antibody panels for NPC were included. Study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed independently by two researchers, and a third researcher was consulted in the case of disagreement. Bivariate models were used for statistical analysis. The quality of included studies was evaluated through Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool (QUADAS-2).
    RESULTS: A total of 70 articles were included, involving 11 863 NPC cases and 34 995 controls. Among the nine EBV-related IgA antibody panels, EBNA1-IgA + VCA-IgA [0.928 (0.898, 0.950)], VCA-IgA + Rta-IgG [0.925 (0.890, 0.949)], EBNA1-IgA + VCA-IgA + Zta-IgA [0.962 (0.909, 0.985)] and VCA-IgA + EA-IgA + Rta-IgG [0.945 (0.918, 0.964)] demonstrated higher pooled sensitivity (95%CI). In terms of diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) (95%CI), EBNA1-IgA + VCA-IgA [107.647 (61.173, 189.430)], VCA-IgA + Rta-IgG [105.988 (60.118, 186.857)] and EBNA1-IgA + VCA-IgA + Zta-IgA [344.450 (136.351, 870.153)] showed superior performance. Additionally, the SROC curves for EBNA1-IgA + VCA-IgA and VCA-IgA + Rta-IgG were more favorable. However, publication bias was detected for VCA-IgA (P = 0.005) and EBNA1-IgA + VCA-IgA (P = 0.042).
    CONCLUSIONS: In general, parallel detection of serum EBNA1-IgA, VCA-IgA and Zta-IgA antibodies using ELISA demonstrates better pooled sensitivity and DOR among the studied panels. In the cases where fewer indicators are used, serum VCA-IgA and EBNA1-IgA/Rta-IgG antibody panel exhibits a comparable performance.
    BACKGROUND: The International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews registration number: CRD42023426984, registered on May 28, 2023.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:开发基于影像组学和影像特征的实用评分系统,用于预测小于20mm的偶然不确定的小实性肺结节(IISSPN)的恶性潜力。
    方法:对360例经手术证实的恶性IISSPNs(n=213)和良性IISSPNs(n=147)进行回顾性分析。整个队列以7:3的比例随机分为训练组和验证组。使用最小绝对收缩和选择运算符(LASSO)算法来降低影像组学特征的尺寸。采用多因素Logistic分析建立模型。接收机工作特性(ROC)曲线,曲线下面积(AUC),95%置信区间(CI),记录每个模型的敏感性和特异性.开发了基于比值比的评分系统。
    结果:选择三个影像组学特征用于进一步的模型建立。经过多变量逻辑分析,组合模型包括均值,年龄,肺气肿,分叶状和大小,达到最高AUC0.877(95CI:0.830-0.915),准确率83.3%,训练组的敏感性为85.3%,特异性为80.2%,其次是影像组学模型(AUC:0.804)和成像模型(AUC:0.773)。开发了截止值大于4分的评分系统。如果分数大于8分,诊断恶性IISSPN的可能性至少达到92.7%。
    结论:组合模型在预测IISSPN的恶性潜能方面表现出良好的诊断性能。在用户友好的评分系统中,超过12分的分数可以达到100%的完美准确率。
    OBJECTIVE: Develop a practical scoring system based on radiomics and imaging features, for predicting the malignant potential of incidental indeterminate small solid pulmonary nodules (IISSPNs) smaller than 20 mm.
    METHODS: A total of 360 patients with malignant IISSPNs (n = 213) and benign IISSPNs (n = 147) confirmed after surgery were retrospectively analyzed. The whole cohort was randomly divided into training and validation groups at a ratio of 7:3. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm was used to debase the dimensions of radiomics features. Multivariate logistic analysis was performed to establish models. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, area under the curve (AUC), 95% confidence interval (CI), sensitivity and specificity of each model were recorded. Scoring system based on odds ratio was developed.
    RESULTS: Three radiomics features were selected for further model establishment. After multivariate logistic analysis, the combined model including Mean, age, emphysema, lobulated and size, reached highest AUC of 0.877 (95%CI: 0.830-0.915), accuracy rate of 83.3%, sensitivity of 85.3% and specificity of 80.2% in the training group, followed by radiomics model (AUC: 0.804) and imaging model (AUC: 0.773). A scoring system with a cutoff value greater than 4 points was developed. If the score was larger than 8 points, the possibility of diagnosing malignant IISSPNs could reach at least 92.7%.
    CONCLUSIONS: The combined model demonstrated good diagnostic performance in predicting the malignant potential of IISSPNs. A perfect accuracy rate of 100% can be achieved with a score exceeding 12 points in the user-friendly scoring system.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在镇静或全身麻醉期间,围手术期反流抽吸是一个严重问题,特别是当固体胃内容物提示急性上呼吸道阻塞时,可能对患者造成致命后果。目前,在临床中,及时评估胃内容物的方法有限。因此,这项研究检查了超声评估实体胃内容物的功效,提供了一种快速和非侵入性的方法,用于早期检测和有关干预措施的决策。
    方法:该研究包括400名计划进行上消化道内窥镜检查的患者,其中包括胃镜和胃镜联合结肠镜检查和镇静。当患者处于半坐位或右侧卧位(RLD)姿势时,对胃窦进行超声扫描。对固体胃内容物的评估依赖于内窥镜检查期间的直接视觉观察。在内窥镜抽吸胃内容物后进行胃容积测量。接收器工作特征曲线用于评估超声检查在辨别固体含量方面的有效性。
    结果:7例患者在胃镜下进行镇静检查,发现有固体胃内容物。敏感性,特异性,正预测值,超声定性评价固体含量的阴性预测值为85.7%,99%,60%,99.7%,分别。
    结论:超声检查可对胃内容物进行定性评价,并具有合理的准确性。此外,在接受上消化道内窥镜检查并经超声评估患有固体胃内容物的患者中,建议给予轻度镇静。
    背景:www.chictr.org.cn(ChiCTR2100048994);注册于2021年7月19日。
    BACKGROUND: Perioperative reflux aspiration presents a grave concern during sedation or general anesthesia, particularly when solid gastric contents prompt acute upper respiratory obstruction, potentially resulting in fatal consequences for patients. Currently, there are limited means for promptly assessing solid gastric contents in clinical settings. Therefore, this study examined the efficacy of ultrasound assessment for solid gastric contents, offering a rapid and non-invasive approach for early detection and decision-making regarding interventions.
    METHODS: The study included 400 patients scheduled for upper endoscopy procedures, which encompassed both gastroscope and gastroscope combined colonoscopy examinations with sedation. Ultrasound scanning of the antrum was performed while patients were positioned semi-sitting or in the right lateral decubitus (RLD) posture. The evaluation of solid gastric contents relied on direct visual observation during endoscopy. Gastric volume measurement occurred subsequent to endoscopic suction of gastric contents. Receiver operating characteristic curves were utilized to assess the effectiveness of ultrasonography in discerning solid contents.
    RESULTS: Seven patients undergoing gastroscope with sedation were found to have solid gastric contents. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the ultrasound qualitative evaluation of solid contents were 85.7%, 99%, 60%, and 99.7%, respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: Solid stomach contents can be evaluated qualitatively with reasonable accuracy using ultrasonography. Additionally, in patients undergoing upper endoscopy and assessed to have solid gastric contents with ultrasound, administration of mild sedation is recommended.
    BACKGROUND: www.chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR2100048994); registered 19/07/2021.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:疟疾的控制主要取决于快速准确的诊断以及成功的治疗。光学显微镜仍被用作诊断疟疾的金标准方法。Sysmex血液分析仪是一种新的疟疾检测方法。因此,本综述的目的是探讨Sysmex血液分析仪在疟疾诊断中的诊断准确性.
    方法:电子数据库,如PubMed,PubMedCentral,科学直接数据库,谷歌学者,和Scopus用于查找2023年4月至6月14日的相关文章。使用诊断准确性研究质量评估2工具评估研究的方法学质量。使用ReviewManager5.4.1,敏感性和特异性的估计,以及他们95%的置信区间,显示在森林地块上。Stata14.0中的Midas软件用于计算灵敏度的汇总估计值,特异性,正似然比,负似然比,和诊断赔率比。异质性通过使用I2统计进行评估。此外,使用漏斗图和Deeks检验评估发表偏倚。还进行了亚组和回归分析。
    结果:共评估了15项研究的诊断准确性。Sysmex血液分析仪的敏感性和特异性范围为46%至100%和81%至100%,分别。Sysmex血液分析仪的敏感性和特异性的综合估计分别为95%(95%CI:85%-99%)和99%(95%CI:97%-100%),分别。它具有出色的诊断准确性。纳入本荟萃分析的研究之间存在显著的异质性。以聚合酶链反应为金标准的Sysmex血液分析仪的敏感性和特异性的综合评估为97.6%(95%CI:83.2,99.7)和99.4%(98.5,99.8),分别。
    结论:在这篇综述中,Sysmex血液分析仪具有良好的诊断准确性。因此,它可以用作医院和卫生中心疟疾诊断的替代诊断工具。
    背景:系统审查注册PROSPERO(2023:CRD42023427713)。https://www.crd.约克。AC.uk/prospro/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023427713。
    BACKGROUND: Malaria control depends primarily on rapid and accurate diagnosis followed by successful treatment. Light microscopy is still used as a gold standard method for the diagnosis of malaria. The Sysmex hematology analyzer is a novel method for malaria detection. Therefore, the aim of this review was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of the Sysmex hematology analyzer for malaria diagnosis.
    METHODS: Electronic databases like PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Direct databases, Google Scholar, and Scopus were used to find relevant articles from April to June 14, 2023. The studies\' methodological quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. Using Review Manager 5.4.1, the estimates of sensitivity and specificity, as well as their 95% confidence intervals, were shown in forest plots. Midas software in Stata 14.0 was utilized to calculate the summary estimates of sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio. Heterogeneity was assessed by using I2 statistics. In addition, publication bias was assessed using a funnel plot and Deeks\' test. Sub-group and meta- regression analysis were also performed.
    RESULTS: A total of 15 studies were assessed for diagnostic accuracy. The sensitivity and specificity of Sysmex hematology analyzer for studies ranged from 46% to 100% and 81% to 100%, respectively. The summary estimate of sensitivity and specificity of Sysmex hematology analyzer were 95% (95% CI: 85%-99%) and 99% (95% CI: 97%-100%), respectively. It had excellent diagnostic accuracy. There were significant heterogeneity among the studies included in this meta-analysis. The summary estimate of sensitivity and specificity of Sysmex hematology analyzer using polymerase chain reaction as the gold standard was 97.6% (95% CI: 83.2, 99.7) and 99.4% (98.5, 99.8), respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: In this review, Sysmex hematology analyzer had excellent diagnostic accuracy. Therefore, it could be used as an alternate diagnostic tool for malaria diagnosis in the hospital and health center.
    BACKGROUND: Systematic review registration PROSPERO (2023: CRD42023427713). https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023427713.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    结核病(TB)是全球传染病中死亡的主要原因。有效管理结核病需要早期识别患有结核病的个体。资源受限的环境通常缺乏熟练的专业人员来解释结核病诊断中使用的胸部X射线(CXR)。为了应对这一挑战,我们开发了一种基于深度神经网络的新型计算机辅助检测(CAD)软件解决方案,用于CXR的早期结核病诊断,旨在检测可能被人类解释所忽略的细微异常。这项研究是在迄今为止最大的队列规模上进行的,其中CAD软件(DecXpert版本1.4)的性能与黄金标准分子诊断技术进行了验证,GeneXpertMTB/RIF,分析来自印度北部12个初级卫生保健中心和一家三级医院的4363人的数据。DecXpert对活动性TB检测表现出88%的敏感性(95%CI0.85-0.93)和85%的特异性(95%CI0.82-0.91)。结合人口统计,DecXpert曲线下面积为0.91(95%CI0.88-0.94),表明强大的诊断性能。我们的发现证实了DecXpert的潜力是准确的,有效的AI解决方案,用于早期识别活动性结核病例。在资源有限的环境中作为筛选工具部署,DecXpert可以早期识别结核病患者,并在熟练的放射学解释有限的情况下促进有效的结核病管理。
    Tuberculosis (TB) is the leading cause of mortality among infectious diseases globally. Effectively managing TB requires early identification of individuals with TB disease. Resource-constrained settings often lack skilled professionals for interpreting chest X-rays (CXRs) used in TB diagnosis. To address this challenge, we developed \"DecXpert\" a novel Computer-Aided Detection (CAD) software solution based on deep neural networks for early TB diagnosis from CXRs, aiming to detect subtle abnormalities that may be overlooked by human interpretation alone. This study was conducted on the largest cohort size to date, where the performance of a CAD software (DecXpert version 1.4) was validated against the gold standard molecular diagnostic technique, GeneXpert MTB/RIF, analyzing data from 4363 individuals across 12 primary health care centers and one tertiary hospital in North India. DecXpert demonstrated 88% sensitivity (95% CI 0.85-0.93) and 85% specificity (95% CI 0.82-0.91) for active TB detection. Incorporating demographics, DecXpert achieved an area under the curve of 0.91 (95% CI 0.88-0.94), indicating robust diagnostic performance. Our findings establish DecXpert\'s potential as an accurate, efficient AI solution for early identification of active TB cases. Deployed as a screening tool in resource-limited settings, DecXpert could enable early identification of individuals with TB disease and facilitate effective TB management where skilled radiological interpretation is limited.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:尽管全球研究早期发现年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD),大规模筛查还不够。通过智能手机捕获的视网膜图像的自动分析提供了一个潜在的解决方案;然而,根据我们的知识,这种人工智能(AI)系统尚未得到评估。该研究旨在评估AI算法在便携式眼底相机上捕获的图像上检测相关AMD的性能。
    方法:使用年龄相关性眼病研究(AREDS)和目标设备的回顾性图像数据库。
    方法:该算法是在两个不同的数据集上进行训练的,这些数据集具有以黄斑为中心的图像:最初是在AREDS的108张图像(55%相关AMD)上进行训练,然后对使用目标设备在亚洲眼睛上捕获的1108张图像(33%相关AMD)进行微调。该模型被设计为指示可参考的AMD(中级和高级AMD)的存在。在第一步训练之后,测试组由909张图像组成(49%为AMD).对于微调步骤,测试组由238张(34%为AMD)图像组成.AREDS数据集的参考标准是中央阅读中心的眼底图像分级,对于目标设备,这是专家的共识图像评分。
    方法:受试者工作曲线下面积(AUC),算法的敏感性和特异性。
    结果:在微调之前,深度学习(DL)算法表现出的测试集(来自AREDS)灵敏度为93.48%(95%CI:90.8%至95.6%),特异性为82.33%(95%CI:78.6%至85.7%),AUC为0.965(95%CI:0.95至0.98)。经过微调,DL算法显示测试集(来自目标设备)的灵敏度为91.25%(95%CI:82.8%至96.4%),特异性为84.18%(95%CI:77.5%至89.5%)和AUC0.947(95%CI:0.911至0.982)。
    结论:DL算法在从基于智能手机的便携式成像系统中检测可参考的AMD方面显示出有希望的结果。这种方法可以为服务不足的地区带来有效且负担得起的AMD筛查。
    OBJECTIVE: Despite global research on early detection of age-related macular degeneration (AMD), not enough is being done for large-scale screening. Automated analysis of retinal images captured via smartphone presents a potential solution; however, to our knowledge, such an artificial intelligence (AI) system has not been evaluated. The study aimed to assess the performance of an AI algorithm in detecting referable AMD on images captured on a portable fundus camera.
    METHODS: A retrospective image database from the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) and target device was used.
    METHODS: The algorithm was trained on two distinct data sets with macula-centric images: initially on 108,251 images (55% referable AMD) from AREDS and then fine-tuned on 1108 images (33% referable AMD) captured on Asian eyes using the target device. The model was designed to indicate the presence of referable AMD (intermediate and advanced AMD). Following the first training step, the test set consisted of 909 images (49% referable AMD). For the fine-tuning step, the test set consisted of 238 (34% referable AMD) images. The reference standard for the AREDS data set was fundus image grading by the central reading centre, and for the target device, it was consensus image grading by specialists.
    METHODS: Area under receiver operating curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity of algorithm.
    RESULTS: Before fine-tuning, the deep learning (DL) algorithm exhibited a test set (from AREDS) sensitivity of 93.48% (95% CI: 90.8% to 95.6%), specificity of 82.33% (95% CI: 78.6% to 85.7%) and AUC of 0.965 (95% CI:0.95 to 0.98). After fine-tuning, the DL algorithm displayed a test set (from the target device) sensitivity of 91.25% (95% CI: 82.8% to 96.4%), specificity of 84.18% (95% CI: 77.5% to 89.5%) and AUC 0.947 (95% CI: 0.911 to 0.982).
    CONCLUSIONS: The DL algorithm shows promising results in detecting referable AMD from a portable smartphone-based imaging system. This approach can potentially bring effective and affordable AMD screening to underserved areas.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    感染人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)的患者可能会削弱免疫力,并伴有机会性感染,特别是结核分枝杆菌(MTB)。值得注意的是,HIV-MTB合并感染会加速疾病进程,大大增加患者的死亡率。由于传统的诊断方法耗时且灵敏度低,我们旨在研究mNGS(宏基因组下一代测序)和mNanoPore测序(宏基因组纳米孔测序)在HIV感染患者结核病快速诊断中的作用.
    纳入122例HIV感染患者进行回顾性分析。所有患者都接受了传统的微生物测试,mNGS,和(或)mNPS测试。以临床综合诊断为参考标准,比较培养物的诊断性能,mNGS,和mNPS对结核病的影响。我们还研究了mNGS和mNPS对混合感染的诊断价值。此外,分析了mNGS和mNPS指导的治疗调整。
    与复合参考标准相比,培养显示42.6%的临床敏感性和100%的特异性,OMT(其他微生物检测)的敏感性为38.9%,特异性为100%。mNGS的临床敏感性为58.6%,特异性为96.8%,mNPS的临床敏感性为68.0%,特异性为100%。结核组混合感染病例的比例(88.9%)高于非结核组(54.8%),与传统方法相比,mNGS和mNPS在混合感染诊断上更具竞争力。此外,有63例患者(69.2%)和36例患者(63.2%)在接受mNPS和mNGS检测后获得有效治疗,分别。
    我们的研究表明,与传统方法相比,mNPS和mNGS对结核病诊断具有较高的敏感性和特异性,mNPS似乎比mNGS具有更好的诊断性能。此外,mNGS和mNPS在检测混合感染方面具有明显优势。mNPS和mNGS指导的药物调整对于免疫力较低的HIV感染患者具有有效的治疗效果。
    UNASSIGNED: Patients who were infected by the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) could have weakened immunity that is complicated by opportunistic infections, especially for Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB). Notably, the HIV-MTB co-infection will accelerate the course of disease progress and greatly increase the mortality of patients. Since the traditional diagnostic methods are time-consuming and have low sensitivity, we aim to investigate the performance of mNGS (metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing) and mNPS (metagenomic NanoPore Sequencing) for the rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis in HIV-infected patients.
    UNASSIGNED: The 122 HIV-infected patients were enrolled for the retrospective analysis. All of the patients underwent traditional microbiological tests, mNGS, and (or) mNPS tests. The clinical comprehensive diagnosis was used as the reference standard to compare the diagnostic performance of culture, mNGS, and mNPS on tuberculosis. We also investigate the diagnostic value of mNGS and mNPS on mixed-infection. Furthermore, the treatment adjustment directed by mNGS and mNPS was analyzed.
    UNASSIGNED: Compared with the composite reference standard, the culture showed 42.6% clinical sensitivity and 100% specificity, and the OMT(other microbiological testing) had 38.9% sensitivity and 100% specificity. The mNGS had 58.6% clinical sensitivity and 96.8% specificity, and the mNPS had 68.0% clinical sensitivity and 100% specificity. The proportion of mixed-infection cases (88.9%) in the TB group was higher than those in the non-TB group (54.8%) and the mNGS and mNPS are more competitive on mixed-infection diagnosis compared with the traditional methods. Furthermore, there are 63 patients (69.2%) and 36 patients (63.2%) achieved effective treatment after receiving the detection of mNPS and mNGS, respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: Our study indicated that mNPS and mNGS have high sensitivity and specificity for TB diagnosis compared with the traditional methods, and mNPS seems to have better diagnostic performance than mNGS. Moreover, mNGS and mNPS showed apparent advantages in detecting mixed infection. The mNPS and mNGS-directed medication adjustment have effective treatment outcomes for HIV-infected patients who have lower immunity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号