Rh Isoimmunization

Rh 等免疫
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    怀孕期间的RhD同种免疫仍然是胎儿和新生儿溶血病(HDFN)的主要原因。然而,还有其他抗原可能与这种现象的发生有关,并且比例一直在增长,鉴于目前的预防策略仅侧重于抗RhD抗体。虽然不广泛,由这些抗体引起的疾病的筛查和诊断管理在文献中有建议.出于这个原因,进行了以下审查,目的是列出所描述的主要红细胞抗原组-例如Rh,ABO,凯尔,MNS,Duffy,基德,除其他外-解决每个人的临床重要性,流行在不同的国家,并建议在怀孕期间检测此类抗体时进行管理。
    RhD alloimmunization in pregnancy is still the main cause of hemolytic disease of the fetus and neonate (HDFN). Nevertheless, there are other antigens that may be associated with the occurrence of this phenomenon and that have been growing in proportion, given that current prevention strategies focus only on anti-RhD antibodies. Although not widespread, the screening and diagnostic management of the disease caused by these antibodies has recommendations in the literature. For this reason, the following review was carried out with the objective of listing the main red blood cell antigen groups described - such as Rh, ABO, Kell, MNS, Duffy, Kidd, among others - addressing the clinical importance of each one, prevalence in different countries, and recommended management when detecting such antibodies during pregnancy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    胎儿和新生儿的Rh溶血性疾病是怀孕期间产生抗D的D阴性母亲的潜在风险,这可能导致随后怀孕的发病率和死亡率。为了预防这种溶血病,Rho(D)免疫球蛋白(RhIG)通常在妊娠28周和分娩后不久施用于D阴性母亲,而不使用抗D。然而,目前的指南建议,具有分子定义的弱D型1,2,3,4.0和4.1的孕妇不需要RhIG,因为当暴露于具有D阳性红细胞的胎儿时,她们不太可能产生同种抗体D.这个问题和RHD基因分型的必要性在西方国家已经被广泛讨论,这些变体相对常见。最近的证据表明,亚洲型DEL(c.1227G>A)的女性在暴露于D阳性红细胞时也不会形成同种异体D。我们报告说,患有分子定义的亚洲型DEL的母亲,与具有弱D类型1、2、3、4.0和4.1的类似,在交付之前和之后不需要RhIG。总的来说,这篇综述可以为国际准则的修订铺平道路,包括基于特定基因型的RhIG的选择性使用,特别是在女性与亚洲类型的DEL。
    Rh hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn is a potential risk for D-negative mothers who produce anti-D during pregnancy, which can lead to morbidity and mortality in subsequent pregnancies. To prevent this hemolytic disease, Rho(D) immune globulin (RhIG) is generally administered to D-negative mothers without anti-D at 28 weeks of gestation and shortly after delivery. However, current guidelines suggest that pregnant mothers with molecularly defined weak D types 1, 2, 3, 4.0, and 4.1 do not need RhIG as they are unlikely to produce alloanti-D when exposed to fetuses with D-positive red cells. This issue and the necessity of RHD genotyping have been extensively discussed in Western countries, where these variants are relatively common. Recent evidence indicates that women with Asian-type DEL (c.1227G>A) also do not form alloanti-D when exposed to D-positive red cells. We report that mothers with molecularly defined Asian-type DEL, similar to those with weak D types 1, 2, 3, 4.0, and 4.1, do not require RhIG before and after delivery. Collectively, this review could pave the way for the revision of international guidelines to include the selective use of RhIG based on specific genotypes, particularly in women with the Asian-type DEL.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    多胎妊娠随着辅助生殖的使用而增加,我们预计在不久的将来会有更多的女性在多胎妊娠中报告Rh等免疫。单胎本身的宫内输血在技术上是困难的,需要大量的技巧和精度。在双胞胎/三胞胎中进行两次/三次输血预计将更加苛刻。
    提高对双胞胎和三胞胎宫内输血技术困难的认识。
    我们报告了一个病例系列,在5年内有4个Rh免疫的双胞胎/三胞胎,他们表现为需要宫内输血的严重贫血。
    四组案件中的每一组都有自己的复杂性,在解决它们之前需要思考,因为文献中没有太多可用的东西。在案例1中,我们20年的经验中的第一个双胞胎宫内输血,强调了由于胎盘后部放置导致的第一对双胞胎的接近困难。病例2很少见,因为除了Rh-D免疫外,母亲中还伴随着非典型抗体的存在,这使得难以交叉匹配任何供体血液进行宫内输血。由于双胞胎的单绒毛膜-羊膜性,第三例是排他性的,其中应考虑双胎间吻合对输血的影响。第四例是三胎妊娠,很难将哪根脐带分配给哪个胎儿,拥挤的干预空间,以及延长手术时间的风险和早产/胎膜早破的相关风险也是我们关注的问题.
    双胞胎/三胞胎的宫内输血(IUT)具有挑战性。在多胎妊娠IUT期间遇到的困难是由于不同或不确定的绒毛膜形成。胎盘内血管间吻合,双胞胎贫血程度不同,由于多个胎儿部位拥挤,难以确定脐带与胎儿的关系,并且难以到达胎盘插入部位。
    UNASSIGNED: Multiple pregnancies have increased with the use of assisted reproduction, and we expect more women reporting with Rh isoimmunization among multiple gestation in near future. Intrauterine transfusion in singleton itself is technically difficult and requires a lot of skill and precision. Performing double/triple transfusion in twins/triplets is expected to be more demanding.
    UNASSIGNED: To create awareness on the technical difficulties encountered in intrauterine transfusion in twins and triplets.
    UNASSIGNED: We report a case series of four Rh-isoimmunized twins/triplets in 5 years who presented with severe anemia requiring intrauterine transfusion.
    UNASSIGNED: Each of the four sets of cases had their own intricacies that needed to be pondered before tackling them as not much was available in the literature. In Case 1, the first twin intrauterine transfusion in our 20-year-long experience, the difficulty in the approach to the first twin due to a posteriorly placed placenta has been highlighted. Case 2 was rare due to the concomitant presence of atypical antibodies in the mother in addition to Rh-D isoimmunization that made it difficult to cross match any donor blood for intrauterine transfusion. The third case was exclusive due to its monochorionic-diamniotic nature of the twins where the impact of inter-twin anastomosis on the transfusion was to be taken into consideration. Fourth case was a triplet gestation where the difficulty of which cord to be assigned to which fetus, the crowded space for intervention, as well as the risk of prolonged operative time and associated risk of preterm/premature rupture of membranes were our concern.
    UNASSIGNED: Intrauterine transfusion (IUT) in twins/triplets is challenging. Difficulties encountered during IUT in multifetal gestation are due to different or uncertain chorionicity, intraplacental anastomosis between vessels, different degree of anemia in twins, difficult to ascertain cord-fetus relationship and difficulty to reach placental insertion site due to crowding by multiple fetal parts.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    虽然人口水平的数据表明Rh免疫球蛋白在妊娠12周前是不必要的,临床证据有限。因此,指导方针各不相同,围绕Rh测试和治疗的风险和益处造成混淆。随着传统临床环境中的堕胎护理变得越来越难获得,许多人选择自我管理,需要知道是否有必要进行辅助血型检测。
    确定母体暴露于胎儿红细胞(fRBC)的频率超过诱导的早三个月流产中Rh致敏的最保守公布的阈值。
    多中心,观察,前瞻性队列研究使用高通量流式细胞术检测诱导的孕早期流产(药物或手术)前后配对母体血液样本中的循环fRBC。包括在妊娠12周0天之前进行妊娠早期流产的个体。从506名接受医学(n=319[63.0%])或手术(n=187[37.0%])流产的参与者中获得了配对血液样本。
    诱导孕早期流产。
    主要结果是诱导的孕早期流产后fRBC计数高于致敏阈值(125fRBC/5百万总RBC)的参与者比例。
    在506名参与者中,平均(SD)年龄为27.4(5.5)岁,313人(61.9%)是黑人,白人为123人(24.3%)。506名参与者中有3名在基线时fRBC计数升高;这些患者中有1名在流产后fRBC计数升高(0.2%[95%CI,0%-0.93%])。在诱导孕早期流产后,没有其他参与者的fRBC计数升高超过致敏阈值。从基线的中位数变化为0fRBC,24个和35.6个fRBC的第95个和第99个百分位数,分别。尽管流产前和流产后FRBC计数之间有很强的关联,没有其他基线特征与流产后fRBC计数显著相关.
    妊娠早期流产不是Rh致敏的危险因素,表明在妊娠12周前不需要Rh检测和治疗。此证据可用于为妊娠早期流产后Rh免疫球蛋白给药的国际指南提供信息。
    While population-level data suggest Rh immunoglobulin is unnecessary before 12 weeks\' gestation, clinical evidence is limited. Thus, guidelines vary, creating confusion surrounding risks and benefits of Rh testing and treatment. As abortion care in traditional clinical settings becomes harder to access, many people are choosing to self-manage and need to know if ancillary blood type testing is necessary.
    To determine how frequently maternal exposure to fetal red blood cells (fRBCs) exceeds the most conservative published threshold for Rh sensitization in induced first-trimester abortion.
    Multicenter, observational, prospective cohort study using high-throughput flow cytometry to detect circulating fRBCs in paired maternal blood samples before and after induced first-trimester abortion (medication or procedural). Individuals undergoing induced first-trimester abortion before 12 weeks 0 days\' gestation were included. Paired blood samples were available from 506 participants who underwent either medical (n = 319 [63.0%]) or procedural (n = 187 [37.0%]) abortion.
    Induced first-trimester abortion.
    The primary outcome was the proportion of participants with fRBC counts above the sensitization threshold (125 fRBCs/5 million total RBCs) after induced first-trimester abortion.
    Among the 506 participants, the mean (SD) age was 27.4 (5.5) years, 313 (61.9%) were Black, and 123 (24.3%) were White. Three of the 506 participants had elevated fRBC counts at baseline; 1 of these patients had an elevated fRBC count following the abortion (0.2% [95% CI, 0%-0.93%]). No other participants had elevated fRBC counts above the sensitization threshold after induced first-trimester abortion. The median change from baseline was 0 fRBCs, with upper 95th and 99th percentiles of 24 and 35.6 fRBCs, respectively. Although there was a strong association between the preabortion and postabortion fRBC counts, no other baseline characteristic was significantly associated with postabortion fRBC count.
    Induced first-trimester abortion is not a risk factor for Rh sensitization, indicating that Rh testing and treatment are unnecessary before 12 weeks\' gestation. This evidence may be used to inform international guidelines for Rh immunoglobulin administration following first-trimester induced abortion.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:仅针对携带RhD阳性胎儿的RhD阴性孕妇(通过胎儿RHD基因分型确定)进行抗D免疫球蛋白(Ig)的常规产前预防,除产后预防外,D-同种免疫接种显着降低。实现高分析灵敏度和少量假阴性胎儿RHD结果将使新生儿的RhD分型变得多余。然后可以基于胎儿RHD基因分型的结果给予产后预防。终止脐带血新生儿的常规RhD分型将简化产妇护理。因此,我们比较了胎儿RHD基因分型与新生儿RhD分型的结果。
    方法:进行胎儿RHD基因分型,和产前抗DIg分别在妊娠第24周和第28周给予。报告了2017-2020年的数据。
    结果:十个实验室报告了18,536个胎儿RHD基因分型,和16378例新生儿RhD分型结果。我们发现46个假阳性(0.28%)和7个假阴性(0.04%)结果。检测的灵敏度为99.93%,而特异性为99.24%。
    结论:很少有假阴性结果支持胎儿RHD基因分型的良好分析质量。因此,将在全国范围内停止常规脐带血RhD分型,现在将根据胎儿RHD基因分型的结果给予产后抗DIg。
    BACKGROUND: Targeted routine antenatal prophylaxis with anti-D immunoglobulin (Ig) only to RhD-negative pregnant women who carry RhD-positive fetuses (determined by fetal RHD genotyping) has reduced D-alloimmunization significantly when administered in addition to postnatal prophylaxis. Achieving high analysis sensitivity and few false-negative fetal RHD results will make RhD typing of the newborn redundant. Postnatal prophylaxis can then be given based on the result of fetal RHD genotyping. Terminating routine RhD typing of the newborns in cord blood will streamline maternity care. Accordingly, we compared the results of fetal RHD genotyping with RhD typing of the newborns.
    METHODS: Fetal RHD genotyping was performed, and antenatal anti-D Ig was administered at gestational week 24 and 28, respectively. Data for 2017-2020 are reported.
    RESULTS: Ten laboratories reported 18,536 fetal RHD genotypings, and 16,378 RhD typing results of newborns. We found 46 false-positive (0.28%) and seven false-negative (0.04%) results. Sensitivity of the assays was 99.93%, while specificity was 99.24%.
    CONCLUSIONS: Few false-negative results support the good analysis quality of fetal RHD genotyping. Routine cord blood RhD typing will therefore be discontinued nationwide and postnatal anti-D Ig will now be given based on the result of fetal RHD genotyping.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:总结有胎儿贫血风险的同种免疫妇女的图像质量变量。探讨末次就诊时大脑中动脉峰值收缩期血流速度(MCA-PSV)图像质量与基于血红蛋白的胎儿贫血的关系。
    方法:本研究是对过去3年在明尼阿波利斯医院发现的26名同种免疫妇女的192张多普勒超声图像进行定性回顾性分析。根据文献中发现的七个标准对图像进行分级。
    结果:在分析的图像中,192个中的23个(12.0%)符合所有七个图像质量标准。使用最高的MCA-PSV值,灵敏度,特异性分别为55.6%和94.1%,分别。使用MCA-PSV中值,灵敏度,特异性分别为44.4%和94.1%,分别。
    结论:只有少数多普勒图像符合所有建议的图像标准。这可能会对MCA-PSV测量的准确性产生负面影响,如我们评估中灵敏度降低所示。
    OBJECTIVE: To summarize image quality variables for alloimmunized women at risk for fetal anemia. To investigate the association between image quality with the highest and median middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity (MCA-PSV) at the last visit and fetal anemia based on hemoglobin.
    METHODS: This study was a qualitative retrospective analysis of 192 Doppler ultrasound images used in the detection of fetal anemia in 26 alloimmunized women seen in a Minneapolis hospital over the past 3 years. Images were graded on seven criteria found in literature.
    RESULTS: Of the images analyzed, 23 (12.0%) of the 192 met all seven image quality criteria. Using the highest MCA-PSV value, the sensitivity, and specificity were 55.6% and 94.1%, respectively. Using the median MCA-PSV value, the sensitivity, and specificity were 44.4% and 94.1%, respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: Only a minority of Doppler images meet all suggested image criteria. This could negatively impact the accuracy of the MCA-PSV measurements as indicated by the decreased sensitivity in our evaluations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:在新生儿中,尽管预防抗D免疫球蛋白,但恒河猴D同种免疫很少见,而且往往无法解释。恒河猴D同种免疫可导致新生儿溶血病,伴有贫血和未结合的高胆红素血症。在过去的报道中,短暂性先天性高胰岛素血症已被描述为恒河猴D同种免疫的罕见并发症。我们的病例报告表明,恒河猴D同种免疫可导致严重的先天性高胰岛素血症的假性综合征。贫血,和结合型高胆红素血症,尽管正确施用抗D免疫球蛋白预防。
    方法:我们报告了一名36岁的老人,ARhD阴性血型的高加索孕妇1,第1段母亲接受常规产前抗D免疫球蛋白预防。她的足月新生男孩患有严重的先天性高胰岛素血症,贫血,和缀合性高胆红素血症高达295µmol/L(参考<9),占总胆红素的64%。怀疑综合征性先天性高胰岛素血症。检查显示直接抗球蛋白试验呈阳性,最初解释为由不规则抗体引起;通过18F-DOPA正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描进行的弥漫性先天性高胰岛素血症;先天性高胰岛素血症的正常遗传分析;肝酶轻度升高;延迟,但通过Tc99m-肝胆亚氨基二乙酸闪烁显像显示胆汁排泄;肝活检显示胆汁淤积和轻度纤维化。产妇抗D滴度为产后第20天1:16,000。无法识别母亲血液中的Y染色体物质。这可能,然而,不排除晚期产期妊娠出血作为免疫原因。三人全外显子组测序没有更深入的致病遗传发现。该患儿在5.5个月后进入临床缓解期。
    结论:我们的病例表明,恒河猴D同种免疫可能表现为假性综合征,伴有短暂性先天性高胰岛素血症,贫血,合并高胆红素血症的胆汁综合征,尽管预防了抗D免疫球蛋白,可能是晚期母胎出血。
    BACKGROUND: In neonates, rhesus D alloimmunization despite anti-D immunoglobulin prophylaxis is rare and often unexplained. Rhesus D alloimmunization can lead to hemolytic disease of the newborn with anemia and unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia. In past reports, transient congenital hyperinsulinism has been described as a rare complication of rhesus D alloimmunization. Our case report illustrates that rhesus D alloimmunization can result in a pseudosyndrome with severe congenital hyperinsulinism, anemia, and conjugated hyperbilirubinemia, despite correctly administered anti-D immunoglobulin prophylaxis.
    METHODS: We report of a 36-year-old, Caucasian gravida 1, para 1 mother with A RhD negative blood type who received routine antenatal anti-D immunoglobulin prophylaxis. Her full term newborn boy presented with severe congenital hyperinsulinism, anemia, and conjugated hyperbilirubinemia up to 295 µmol/L (ref. < 9), accounting for 64% of the total bilirubin. Syndromic congenital hyperinsulinism was suspected. Examinations showed a positive direct antiglobulin test, initially interpreted as caused by irregular antibodies; diffuse congenital hyperinsulinism by 18F-DOPA positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan; normal genetic analyses for congenital hyperinsulinism; mildly elevated liver enzymes; delayed, but present bile excretion by Tc99m-hepatobiliary iminodiacetic acid scintigraphy; and cholestasis and mild fibrosis by liver biopsy. The maternal anti-D titer was 1:16,000 day 20 postpartum. Y-chromosome material in the mother\'s blood could not be identified. This could, however, not exclude late intrapartum fetomaternal hemorrhage as the cause of immunization. No causative genetic findings were deetrmined by trio whole exome sequencing. The child went into clinical remission after 5.5 months.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our case demonstrates that rhesus D alloimmunization may present as a pseudosyndrome with transient congenital hyperinsulinism, anemia, and inspissated bile syndrome with conjugated hyperbilirubinaemia, despite anti-D immunoglobulin prophylaxis, possibly due to late fetomaternal hemorrhage.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项审查的目的是系统地审查在流产的未敏感的恒河猴(RhD)阴性个体中常规抗D给药的结果。此评论已在Prospero注册。
    搜索所有已发表和正在进行的研究,没有语言或出版状态的限制,从一开始就使用以下数据库进行:EBM评论Ovid-Cochrane中央对照试验登记册,MEDLINEOvid(Epub在打印前,过程中和其他非索引引文和每日),Embase.com,Popline和谷歌学者。研究类型包括:随机对照试验,对照试验,从1971年开始的队列和病例对照研究。人口包括接受堕胎的妇女(诱导,不完整,自发性或败血症流产),医疗或手术<12周,并在随后的怀孕中进行免疫接种。主要结果是:(1)Kleihauer-Betke试验阳性的发展和(2)在随后的妊娠中Rh同种免疫的发展。
    共筛选了2652项研究,其中105项进行了全文审查。两项研究被纳入其中,并受到高度偏倚的赞赏。两项研究都发现,流产后很少有妇女对形成抗体敏感。可用的有限研究和异质性阻碍了荟萃分析的进行。
    Rh免疫球蛋白具有良好的安全性。然而,它并非没有风险和成本,是提供高效服务的可能障碍,并且在某些国家/地区可能有限。目前研究的证据基础和质量有限。建议在妊娠早期进行Rh测试和免疫球蛋白给药的益处尚不清楚。随着临床实践指南的变化,需要更多的研究,基于专家的意见,并在堕胎时远离测试和管理。
    妊娠早期Rh检测和免疫球蛋白给药的医学益处的证据有限。需要进一步的研究来定义同种免疫接种和免疫球蛋白益处,以更新护理标准。此外,在制定临床政策和指南时,应考虑其他因素,如成本,可行性和对患者获得护理的影响。
    The aim of this review was to systematically review the outcome of routine anti-D administration among unsensitised rhesus (RhD)-negative individuals who have an abortion. This review is registered with Prospero.
    A search for all published and ongoing studies, without restrictions on language or publication status, was performed using the following databases from their inception: EBM Reviews Ovid - Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE Ovid (Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations and Daily), Embase.com, Popline and Google Scholar. Study types included: randomised controlled trials, controlled trials, cohort and case-control studies from 1971 onwards. The population included women who undergo an abortion (induced, incomplete, spontaneous or septic abortion), medical or surgical <12 weeks, and isoimmunisation in a subsequent pregnancy. The primary outcomes were: (1) development of a positive Kleihauer-Betke test and (2) development of Rh alloimmunisation in a subsequent pregnancy.
    A total of 2652 studies were screened with 105 accessed for full-text review. Two studies have been included with high bias appreciated. Both studies found few women to be sensitised in forming antibodies after an abortion. The limited studies available and heterogeneity prevent the conduction of a meta-analysis.
    Rh immunoglobulin has well-documented safety. However, it is not without risks and costs, is a possible barrier to delivering efficient services, and may have limited availability in some countries. The evidence base and quality of studies are currently limited. There is unclear benefit from the recommendation for Rh testing and immunoglobulin administration in early pregnancy. More research is needed as clinical practice guidelines are varied, based on expert opinions and moving away from testing and administration at time of abortion.
    There is limited evidence surrounding medical benefit of Rh testing and immunoglobulin administration in early pregnancy. Further research is needed to define alloimmunisation and immunoglobulin benefit to update standards of care. Additionally, other factors should be considered in forming clinical policies and guidelines such as costs, feasibility and impact on access to care for patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:非侵入性胎儿恒河猴D(RhD)血型分型可以防止在非同种免疫RhD阴性妊娠中不必要地使用抗D免疫球蛋白(RhIG),并可以指导同种免疫妊娠的治疗。我们对经济学文献进行了系统回顾,以确定这种干预措施相对于常规治疗的成本效益。
    方法:系统文献检索书目数据库(OvidMEDLINE,Embase,和Cochrane),直到2019年2月26日,并进行自动警报直到2020年10月30日,以及灰色文献来源,以检索所有英语研究。
    方法:我们纳入了血清学证实的非同种免疫或同种免疫RhD阴性妊娠的研究,比较干预与常规护理的成本和有效性。
    方法:两名评审员从符合条件的研究中提取数据,并使用卫生经济研究质量(QHES)和Drummond工具评估其方法学质量(偏倚风险)。我们叙述性地综合了研究结果。我们的综述包括8项经济学研究,这些研究评估了非侵入性胎儿RhD基因分型,然后在非同种免疫妊娠中进行靶向RhIG预防。五项研究进一步考虑了随后的同种免疫妊娠。干预与常规护理的成本效益(例如,非同种异体妊娠的通用RhIG或以父亲测试结果为条件的预防)不一致。两项研究表明,干预措施的好处更大,成本更低,另外2个建议进行权衡。在4项研究中,干预措施的有效性和成本低于替代方案.通过这两种工具,三项研究被确定为高质量的。其中两项研究支持干预,其中一项评估了质量调整生命年的益处。没有研究清楚地检查了在多次非同种免疫或同种免疫妊娠中重复使用胎儿基因分型的成本效益。基因分型的成本是最有影响的参数。
    结论:非侵入性胎儿RhD基因分型对非同种免疫妊娠的成本效益在不同研究之间存在差异。有针对性地管理同种免疫妊娠的潜在节省需要进一步研究。
    OBJECTIVE: Noninvasive fetal rhesus D (RhD) blood group genotyping may prevent unnecessary use of anti-D immunoglobulin (RhIG) in non-alloimmunized RhD-negative pregnancies and can guide management of alloimmunized pregnancies. We conducted a systematic review of the economic literature to determine the cost-effectiveness of this intervention over usual care.
    METHODS: Systematic literature searches of bibliographic databases (Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane) until February 26, 2019, and auto-alerts until October 30, 2020, and of grey literature sources were performed to retrieve all English-language studies.
    METHODS: We included studies done in serologically confirmed non-alloimmunized or alloimmunized RhD-negative pregnancies, comparing costs and effectiveness of the intervention versus usual care.
    METHODS: Two reviewers extracted data from the eligible studies and assessed their methodological quality (risk of bias) using the Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) and Drummond tools. We narratively synthesized findings. Our review included 8 economic studies that evaluated non-invasive fetal RhD genotyping followed by targeted RhIG prophylaxis in non-alloimmunized pregnancies. Five studies further considered a subsequent alloimmunized pregnancy. The cost-effectiveness of the intervention versus usual care (e.g., universal RhIG or prophylaxis conditional on results of paternal testing) for non-alloiummunized pregnancies was inconsistent. Two studies indicated greater benefits and lower costs for the intervention, and another 2 suggested a trade-off. In 4 studies, the intervention was less effective and costlier than alternatives. Three studies were determined to be of high quality by both tools. Two of these studies favoured the intervention, and one assessed benefits in quality-adjusted life-years. No study clearly examined the cost-effectiveness of repetitive use of fetal genotyping in multiple non-alloimmunized or alloimmunized pregnancies. The cost of genotyping was the most influential parameter.
    CONCLUSIONS: The cost-effectiveness of noninvasive fetal RhD genotyping for non-alloimmunized pregnancies varies between studies. Potential savings from targeted management of alloimmunized pregnancies requires further research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号