To explore the value of the acceleration index as a predictor of therapeutic response to orthostatic training in children with vasovagal syncope (VVS).
Thirty-three children with VVS were recruited and treated with orthostatic training. The therapeutic response of each patient was evaluated after 3 months of treatment. A Pearson correlation was calculated between the acceleration index and the severity of VVS. The value of the acceleration index in predicting the therapeutic response to orthostatic training was assessed by analysis of the receiver operating characteristic curve.
Among the 33 children with VVS, 20 were found to be responders and the remaining were nonresponders. The mean acceleration index was significantly lower in responders compared with nonresponders (21.10 ± 6.61 vs 31.36 ± 9.00; P = .001) and it was negatively correlated with positive response time in the head-up tilt test, with systolic blood pressure and with diastolic blood pressure at positive response time in the head-up tilt test (P < .05). The receiver operating characteristic curve for the predictive value of the acceleration index showed that the area under the curve was 0.827 (95% CI, 0.676-0.978; P = .002), and a cutoff value of the acceleration index of 26.77 yielded a sensitivity of 85.0% and a specificity of 69.2%.
The acceleration index may be useful for predicting the efficacy of orthostatic training on VVS in children.

To assess the clinical efficacy of orthostatic training (OT) and its effect on the autonomic activity.
OT was performed in 38 patients (13 males, age 36.4 ± 15.2 years). Baroreflex sensitivity (BRS), heart rate variability, and quality of life (SF 36) were assessed before and after 6 months of OT. Patients with no recurrence of syncope and reduction of the presyncope number to one-third or less were classified as responders.
Compliance to OT was low. Only 55% (38 from 69 patients) completed the training programme; 28 patients were responders (74%) and 10 patients were nonresponders. Before OT, BRS in upright position was lower in responders than in nonresponders (sitting: 8.05 ± 3.94 ms/mm Hg vs 12.51 ± 5.3 ms/mm Hg, P = 0.04, standing: 5.08 ± 2.34 ms/mm Hg vs 7.54 ± 2.16 ms/mm Hg, P = 0.02). After OT, BRS increased in responders (sitting: 8.05 ± 3.94 ms/mm Hg to 9.31 ± 4.49 ms/mm Hg, P = 0.05; standing: 5.08 ± 2.34 ms/mm Hg to 5.96 ± 2.38 ms/mm Hg, P = 0.03). No differences in supine BRS were observed. In responders, low frequency (LF) and high frequency (HF) power in sitting and standing positions significantly increased after OT (P < 0.05). In nonresponders, there was no significant rise in BRS, LF, and HF after OT. A significant increase in quality of life was noted in responders, but not in nonresponders.
OT reduced symptoms in 74% patients who trained regularly. However, the compliance to training was low. Possible mechanism of OT is reconditioning effect on baroreceptor reactivity in upright position.