Organizational Policy

组织政策
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:现有证据表明,组织层面的政策对于实现工作场所的性别平等和公平至关重要。然而,很少有研究探索卫生部门雇员是否在其组织中存在促进妇女职业发展的政策和做法的知识。在这项定性研究中,我们探讨了卫生管理人员的知识和观点,他们组织的工作场所政策和做法有助于提高女性的职业发展,以及他们如何实施和监测这些政策和做法的知识。
    方法:我们采用目的抽样方法来选择研究参与者。该研究采用了定性方法,从我们与在公共和私营卫生部门组织工作的卫生管理人员进行的21次深入访谈和关键线人访谈中获得了细致入微的见解。我们进行了主题分析,以提取与促进肯尼亚卫生部门女性职业发展相关的新兴主题。
    结果:在访谈中,只有少数管理者提到了有助于女性职业发展的政策和做法。这些管理人员经常提到与晋升和灵活工作时间表有关的政策和做法,这是促进妇女职业发展的关键。例如,灵活的工作时间表被认为使妇女能够接受进一步的教育,从而获得晋升。一些女性管理人员认为,只有在执行以女性为重点的计划时,女性才被提升为领导职务。很少提到培训和指导等能力建设政策。卫生管理人员报告了政策和做法是如何实施和总体监测的,然而,他们没有说明具体的政策和做法是如何做到这一点的。对于私营部门来说,卫生管理人员指出,这些政策和做法的实施和监测是在机构一级进行的,而对于公共部门,这是在国家或县一级进行的。
    结论:我们呼吁肯尼亚的卫生部门组织为其工作人员提供持续的政策敏感性会议,并在培训和指导等政策之外制定支持性政策和其他务实干预措施,以促进妇女的职业发展。
    BACKGROUND: Existing evidence suggests that organisation-level policies are important in enabling gender equality and equity in the workplace. However, there is little research exploring the knowledge of health sector employees on whether policies and practices to advance women\'s career progression exist in their organisations. In this qualitative study, we explored the knowledge and perspectives of health managers on which of their organisations\' workplace policies and practices contribute to the career advancement of women and their knowledge of how such policies and practices are implemented and monitored.
    METHODS: We employed a purposive sampling method to select the study participants. The study adopted qualitative approaches to gain nuanced insights from the 21 in-depth interviews and key informant interviews that we conducted with health managers working in public and private health sector organisations. We conducted a thematic analysis to extract emerging themes relevant to advancing women\'s career progression in Kenya\'s health sector.
    RESULTS: During the interviews, only a few managers cited the policies and practices that contribute to women\'s career advancement. Policies and practices relating to promotion and flexible work schedules were mentioned most often by these managers as key to advancing women\'s career progression. For instance, flexible work schedules were thought to enable women to pursue further education which led to promotion. Some female managers felt that women were promoted to leadership positions only when running women-focused programs. There was little mention of capacity-building policies like training and mentorship. The health managers reported how policies and practices are implemented and monitored in general, however, they did not state how this is done for specific policies and practices. For the private sector, the health managers stated that implementation and monitoring of these policies and practices is conducted at the institutional level while for the public sector, this is done at the national or county level.
    CONCLUSIONS: We call upon health-sector organisations in Kenya to offer continuous policy sensitisation sessions to their staff and be deliberate in having supportive policies and other pragmatic interventions beyond policies such as training and mentorship that can enable women\'s career progression.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:分娩住院期间的经历会影响家庭建立和维持母乳喂养的能力。成功母乳喂养的十个步骤(十个步骤)描述了基于证据的医院政策和实践,以改善母乳喂养结果。我们的目的是描述医院实施十步,随着时间的推移,根据医院特点和状态,医院实施了“十步”中的大多数(≥6步)。
    方法:两年一次的婴儿营养与护理产妇实践(mPINC)调查评估了美国(包括哥伦比亚特区和地区)常规提供产妇护理服务的所有医院。我们分析了2018年,2020年和2022年调查周期的数据,以描述实施与十步一致的产妇护理政策和实践的医院患病率趋势。差异是使用2018年至2022年百分比的绝对差异计算的。
    结果:在2018年至2022年之间,实施步骤2:员工能力和步骤5:支持母亲母乳喂养的医院百分比增加了12和8个百分点,分别。2022年实施步骤6:母乳喂养婴儿独家母乳喂养的医院比例比2018年低7个百分点。在2018年至2022年期间,其余七个步骤的实施在任何一个方向上都没有变化超过5个百分点。在全国范围内,实施十步≥6的医院比例从2018年的44.0%上升至2022年的51.1%。根据医院特征,包括州,比较十步中≥6步的实施情况时,发现了差异,医院规模,提供最高水平的新生儿护理。
    结论:在全国范围内,支持母乳喂养的产妇保健政策和做法继续改善;然而,某些做法失去了进展。在各州和某些医院特征中观察到十步实施的差异,建议需要更多的工作来确保所有人在分娩住院期间获得最佳的母乳喂养支持.
    BACKGROUND: Experiences during the birth hospitalization affect a family\'s ability to establish and maintain breastfeeding. The Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding (Ten Steps) describe evidence-based hospital policies and practices shown to improve breastfeeding outcomes. We aim to describe hospitals\' implementation of the Ten Steps, changes over time, and hospitals\' implementation of a majority (≥ 6) of the Ten Steps by hospital characteristics and state.
    METHODS: The biennial Maternity Practices in Infant Nutrition and Care (mPINC) survey assesses all hospitals in the United States (including the District of Columbia and territories) that routinely provide maternity care services. We analyzed data from 2018, 2020, and 2022 survey cycles to describe trends in the prevalence of hospitals implementing maternity care policies and practices that are consistent with the Ten Steps. Differences were calculated using the absolute difference in percentage-points between 2018 and 2022.
    RESULTS: Between 2018 and 2022, the percentage of hospitals that implemented Step 2: Staff Competency and Step 5: Support Mothers with Breastfeeding increased 12 and 8 percentage points, respectively. The percentage of hospitals that implemented Step 6: Exclusive Breastfeeding Among Breastfed Infants was 7 percentage points lower in 2022 than 2018. Implementation of the remaining seven steps did not change by more than 5 percentage points in either direction between 2018 and 2022. Nationally, the percentage of hospitals that implemented ≥ 6 of the Ten Steps increased from 44.0% in 2018 to 51.1% in 2022. Differences were seen when comparing implementation of ≥ 6 of the Ten Steps by hospital characteristics including state, hospital size, and highest level of neonatal care offered.
    CONCLUSIONS: Nationally, maternity care policies and practices supportive of breastfeeding continued to improve; however, certain practices lost progress. Differences in implementation of the Ten Steps were observed across states and by certain hospital characteristics, suggesting more work is needed to ensure all people receive optimal breastfeeding support during their delivery hospitalization.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在SARS-CoV-2大流行的初始阶段,掩蔽已在医疗机构中被广泛接受,以减轻与医疗保健相关的感染风险。证据,然而,口罩在预防与医疗保健相关的SARS-CoV-2收购中的作用仍不清楚。我们调查了2022年BA4/5浪潮期间瑞士急性护理医院中机构面具政策的变化与医疗保健相关的SARS-CoV-2感染的关联。
    方法:2022年6月1日至9月5日住院患者的SARS-CoV-2感染来自“瑞士基于医院的COVID-19监测”数据库,并根据疾病发作时间分类为医疗保健或社区相关。机构提供了有关医护人员的机构掩蔽政策和其他预防政策的信息。每个机构和每种口罩政策都计算了与医疗保健相关的SARS-CoV-2感染的百分比。使用负二项混合效应模型测试了与医疗保健相关的SARS-CoV-2感染与面罩策略的关联。
    结果:我们包括来自13个机构的2'980例SARS-CoV-2感染,444人(15%)被归类为医疗保健相关。2022年6月20日至6月30日,6家(46%)机构改用更为严格的口罩政策。随后,在政策转换的机构中,与医疗保健相关的感染比例下降了,但在其他机构中却没有下降。特别是,与患者接触的HCW从情境性掩蔽(标准预防措施)转为一般掩蔽后,医疗保健相关感染显著减少(比率0.39,95%CI0.30-0.49).相比之下,当不同医院进行比较时,医疗保健相关感染的百分比与口罩政策无关.
    结论:我们的研究结果表明,在机构层面,在医疗保健相关的SARS-CoV-2感染增加期间,转向更严格的口罩政策可能是有益的。
    BACKGROUND: In the initial phase of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, masking has been widely accepted in healthcare institutions to mitigate the risk of healthcare-associated infection. Evidence, however, is still scant and the role of masks in preventing healthcare-associated SARS-CoV-2 acquisition remains unclear.We investigated the association of variation in institutional mask policies with healthcare-associated SARS-CoV-2 infections in acute care hospitals in Switzerland during the BA.4/5 2022 wave.
    METHODS: SARS-CoV-2 infections in hospitalized patients between June 1 and September 5, 2022, were obtained from the \"Hospital-based surveillance of COVID-19 in Switzerland\"-database and classified as healthcare- or community-associated based on time of disease onset. Institutions provided information regarding institutional masking policies for healthcare workers and other prevention policies. The percentage of healthcare-associated SARS-CoV-2 infections was calculated per institution and per type of mask policy. The association of healthcare-associated SARS-CoV-2 infections with mask policies was tested using a negative binominal mixed-effect model.
    RESULTS: We included 2\'980 SARS-CoV-2 infections from 13 institutions, 444 (15%) were classified as healthcare-associated. Between June 20 and June 30, 2022, six (46%) institutions switched to a more stringent mask policy. The percentage of healthcare-associated infections subsequently declined in institutions with policy switch but not in the others. In particular, the switch from situative masking (standard precautions) to general masking of HCW in contact with patients was followed by a strong reduction of healthcare-associated infections (rate ratio 0.39, 95% CI 0.30-0.49). In contrast, when compared across hospitals, the percentage of health-care associated infections was not related to mask policies.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest switching to a more stringent mask policy may be beneficial during increases of healthcare-associated SARS-CoV-2 infections at an institutional level.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial Protocol
    背景:氨甲环酸(TXA)是一种廉价且广泛可用的药物,可减少心脏和骨科手术中的失血和红细胞(RBC)输血。虽然在这些手术中使用TXA是常规的,其在其他手术中的有效性和安全性,包括肿瘤手术,具有可比性的输血率是不确定的。我们的主要目标是评估在接受大型非心脏手术的患者中实施常规TXA的医院政策是否可以减少RBC的输血而不增加血栓形成的风险。
    方法:务实,基于注册表,失明,加拿大10个地点的集群交叉随机对照试验,接受非心脏手术高危红细胞输血的患者。站点以4周的间隔随机分配到术中TXA或匹配安慰剂的医院政策。TXA在皮肤切口处给予1克,然后在皮肤闭合前再加入1克。共同的主要结果是(1)有效性,评估为住院期间输注红细胞的患者比例和(2)安全性,评估90天内诊断为静脉血栓栓塞症的患者比例。次要结果包括:(1)输血:输血的红细胞单位数量(在医院和患者层面);(2)安全性:在医院诊断心肌梗塞,中风,深静脉血栓形成或肺栓塞;(3)临床:住院时间,重症监护室入院,医院生存,90天存活和存活和出院至第30天的天数;和(4)依从性:接受最少一剂研究干预的登记患者的比例。
    背景:已在所有站点获得机构研究伦理委员会的批准。审判结束时,结果的简单语言摘要将发布在试验网站上,并在非专业媒体上分发。我们的试验结果将发表在同行评审的科学杂志上。
    背景:NCT04803747。
    BACKGROUND: Tranexamic acid (TXA) is an inexpensive and widely available medication that reduces blood loss and red blood cell (RBC) transfusion in cardiac and orthopaedic surgeries. While the use of TXA in these surgeries is routine, its efficacy and safety in other surgeries, including oncologic surgeries, with comparable rates of transfusion are uncertain. Our primary objective is to evaluate whether a hospital-level policy implementation of routine TXA use in patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery reduces RBC transfusion without increasing thrombotic risk.
    METHODS: A pragmatic, registry-based, blinded, cluster-crossover randomised controlled trial at 10 Canadian sites, enrolling patients undergoing non-cardiac surgeries at high risk for RBC transfusion. Sites are randomised in 4-week intervals to a hospital policy of intraoperative TXA or matching placebo. TXA is administered as 1 g at skin incision, followed by an additional 1 g prior to skin closure. Coprimary outcomes are (1) effectiveness, evaluated as the proportion of patients transfused RBCs during hospital admission and (2) safety, evaluated as the proportion of patients diagnosed with venous thromboembolism within 90 days. Secondary outcomes include: (1) transfusion: number of RBC units transfused (both at a hospital and patient level); (2) safety: in-hospital diagnoses of myocardial infarction, stroke, deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism; (3) clinical: hospital length of stay, intensive care unit admission, hospital survival, 90-day survival and the number of days alive and out of hospital to day 30; and (4) compliance: the proportion of enrolled patients who receive a minimum of one dose of the study intervention.
    BACKGROUND: Institutional research ethics board approval has been obtained at all sites. At the completion of the trial, a plain language summary of the results will be posted on the trial website and distributed in the lay press. Our trial results will be published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal.
    BACKGROUND: NCT04803747.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    无烟草工作场所政策(TFWP)是基于证据的干预措施,可减少物质使用治疗中心(SUTC)员工和患者的烟草使用量增加。SUTC员工对利益相关者退缩的预期担忧是TFWP采用的障碍。检查预期和实际员工报告的由同事引起的TFWP问题之间的差异,病人,和社区成员在领导关注和员工戒烟护理可用性的背景下,可能会为增加TFWP吸收的策略提供信息。这项研究分析了员工报告的TFWP关注点从之前到之后的变化全面的无烟工作场所干预,其中包括TFWP的实施。使用卡方/费舍尔精确检验。在广义线性混合模型中,作为主持人检查了实施前领导政策的担忧和戒烟护理的可用性。总的来说,452名员工和13名领导提供了13名SUTC的数据,这些SUTC每年为>82,000名患者提供服务。结果显示,随着时间的推移,员工报告的同事对TFWP抗性的担忧显着下降。适度分析表明,员工预期的同事和患者的担忧,分别,在领导层认可实施前TFWP问题的SUTC中,不太可能实现,而员工报告的患者担忧在SUTC中随着时间的推移而上升,在SUTC中,领导层没有最初的实施担忧.此外,在未向员工提供戒烟护理的SUTC中,员工预期的同事担忧被高估了。支持TFWP实施后预期员工关注点的非实现的结果可用于吸引其他SUTC采用TFWP。此外,适度效应可能表明,中心特征转化为对推广的更多关注,最终提高TFWP利益相关者的接受度。
    物质使用治疗中心(SUTC)的员工和患者使用烟草的比例更高,并且不成比例地遭受烟草相关疾病的困扰。实施无烟工作场所政策(TFWP)可以减少这种情况下的烟草使用差异。然而,员工对TFWP的担忧通常会阻碍其采用。这项研究评估了员工报告的关注点如何随时间变化,以及这些变化是否基于中心特征而有所不同,例如中心领导对TFWP的担忧以及员工戒烟服务的可用性。总的来说,最常见的员工报告的关注是由病人引起的,在整个政策实施过程中,其次是同事和社区成员。结果表明,随着时间的推移,所有SUTC的同事预期的担忧都有所下降。此外,员工高估了同事和患者对TFWP的担忧,这些中心的领导对TFWP的实施感到担忧,而在领导没有实施前顾虑的中心,患者的顾虑被低估了.最后,在没有为员工提供戒烟护理的情况下,在SUTC中,员工预期的同事担忧被高估了。研究结果表明,员工可能会高估基于组织因素的各种利益相关者的关注/投诉。此信息可用于通过减轻员工对政策采用的担忧,在TFWP实施中加入额外的SUTC。
    Tobacco-free workplace policies (TFWPs) are underused evidence-based interventions that reduce the elevated use of tobacco among substance use treatment center (SUTC) employees and patients. SUTC employees\' anticipated concerns about stakeholder pushback are barriers to TFWP adoption. Examination of discrepancies between anticipated and actualized employee-reported TFWP concerns arising from coworkers, patients, and community members in the context of leadership concerns and tobacco cessation care availability for employees may inform strategies to increase TFWP uptake. This study analyzed changes in employee-reported TFWP concerns from before to after a comprehensive tobacco-free workplace intervention that included TFWP implementation, using Chi-square/Fisher\'s exact tests. Preimplementation leadership policy concerns and tobacco cessation care availability were examined as moderators in generalized linear mixed models. Overall, 452 employees and 13 leaders provided data from 13 SUTCs collectively serving >82 000 patients annually. Results revealed significant decreases over time in employee-reported concerns about TFWP resistance from coworkers. Moderation analyses indicated that employee-anticipated concerns from coworkers and patients, respectively, were less likely to be actualized in SUTCs where leadership endorsed preimplementation TFWP concerns, whereas employee-reported patient concerns rose over time in SUTCs where leadership had no initial implementation concerns. Additionally, employee-anticipated concerns from coworkers were overestimated in SUTCs that did not offer tobacco cessation care to employees. Results supporting the nonactualization of anticipated employee concerns following TFWP implementation can be used to engage other SUTCs for TFWP adoption. Furthermore, moderation effects may suggest that center characteristics translate to greater attention to rollout, ultimately enhancing TFWP stakeholder acceptance.
    Substance use treatment center (SUTC) employees and patients use tobacco at elevated rates and suffer disproportionately from tobacco-related diseases. The implementation of a tobacco-free workplace policy (TFWP) can reduce tobacco use disparities in this setting. However, employee concerns about TFWPs are often a deterrent to their adoption. This study assessed how employee-reported concerns changed over time and whether these changes differed based on center characteristics like center leadership concerns about the TFWP and availability of tobacco cessation services for employees. Overall, the most common employee-reported concerns were those arising from patients, followed by coworkers and community members throughout policy implementation. Results demonstrated that anticipated concerns from coworkers decreased over time in all SUTCs. Furthermore, TFWP concerns from coworkers and patients were overestimated by employees at centers wherein leadership had concerns about TFWP implementation, whereas patient concerns were underestimated at centers where leadership had no preimplementation concerns. Finally, employee-anticipated concerns from coworkers were overestimated in SUTCs without tobacco cessation care for employees. Findings suggest that employees may overestimate concerns/complaints from various stakeholders based on organizational factors. This information may be used to engage additional SUTCs in TFWP implementation by alleviating employee concerns about policy adoption.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在美国,员工通常在分娩后的8-12周内重返工作岗位,因此,至关重要的是,工作场所应结合母乳喂养和工作为员工提供支持。《平价医疗法案》要求任何拥有50名以上员工的组织提供除洗手间以外的空间来提供母乳,并在工作日提供合理的时间。州和工作场所在执行ACA要求方面有所不同,可能会或可能不会为员工提供母乳喂养和工作相结合的额外支持。这项研究的目的是对州立大学系统内26个机构可用的政策和资源进行分析,以在员工分娩后重返工作岗位时支持母乳喂养。
    方法:调查数据是从每个机构的人力资源部门的福利联络处收集的。此外,我们对每个机构的政策和在线材料进行了文件审查。我们使用单变量统计数据来总结调查结果,并使用归纳和演绎主题分析来分析网站和联络员提供的政策中可用的机构资源。
    结果:共有18位(65.3%)联络员参与了这项研究,他们发现,在整个大学系统中为母乳喂养员工提供的资源方面,总体上缺乏对现行政策的了解和不一致。只有一半的参与联络员报告说,他们的校园里有正式的母乳喂养政策。从文件审查来看,确定了六个主要主题:给员工带来负担,将怀孕或产后描述为“残疾”,“有针对大学的政策,包括母乳喂养的休息时间,主管责任,和哺乳政策的信息。
    结论:对每个机构的在线资源的审查证实了调查结果,并强调了员工发现可用资源和倡导其需求的负担。本文提供了有关机构如何支持母乳喂养员工的见解,并对在大学制定政策以改善在职父母的母乳喂养机会的策略提供了启示。
    BACKGROUND: In the U.S., employees often return to work within 8-12 weeks of giving birth, therefore, it is critical that workplaces provide support for employees combining breastfeeding and work. The Affordable Care Act requires any organization with more than 50 employees to provide a space other than a restroom to express breastmilk and a reasonable amount of time during the workday to do so. States and worksites differ in the implementation of ACA requirements and may or may not provide additional support for employees combining breastfeeding and work. The purpose of this study was to conduct an analysis of the policies and resources available at 26 institutions within a state university system to support breastfeeding when employees return to work after giving birth.
    METHODS: Survey data was collected from Well-being Liaisons in the human resources departments at each institution. In addition, we conducted a document review of policies and online materials at each institution. We used univariate statistics to summarize survey results and an inductive and deductive thematic analysis to analyze institutional resources available on websites and in policies provided by the liaisons.
    RESULTS: A total of 18 (65.3%) liaisons participated in the study and revealed an overall lack of familiarity with the policies in place and inconsistencies in the resources offered to breastfeeding employees across the university system. Only half of the participating liaisons reported a formal breastfeeding policy was in place on their campus. From the document review, six major themes were identified: placing the burden on employees, describing pregnancy or postpartum as a \"disability,\" having a university-specific policy, inclusion of break times for breastfeeding, supervisor responsibility, and information on lactation policies.
    CONCLUSIONS: The review of each institution\'s online resources confirmed the survey findings and highlighted the burden placed on employees to discover the available resources and advocate for their needs. This paper provides insight into how institutions support breastfeeding employees and provides implications on strategies to develop policies at universities to improve breastfeeding access for working parents.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    2018年2月26日和2021年7月24日,中国政府分别发布了两项重要的监管政策,以解决校外培训机构在学生课外和家庭经济负担方面带来的问题。这些政策对我国校外培训行业产生了巨大而深远的影响。在这两个事件的帮助下,我们探讨了行业层面的监管政策在塑造和形成组织文化中的作用。本文采用文本分析方法,结合丹尼森组织文化调查(DOCS)和MAXQDA18软件的维度,获取企业文化数据。然后,回归时间不连续性(RDiT)和具有多个截止值的回归不连续性(RD)设计方法用于估计政策处理效果。这项实证研究表明,监管政策对企业文化有显著影响。此外,不同严格程度的监管政策对企业文化的不同维度有不同的影响。研究结果有助于企业文化理论的建立,可以指导企业更清晰地评价政策对企业文化的影响,从而使他们能够做出更明智的运营决策。
    On February 26, 2018 and July 24, 2021, the Chinese government respectively issued two significant regulatory policies to address the problems caused by off-campus training institutions in terms of students\' extra-curricular and family financial burdens. These policies have had a tremendous and far-reaching impact on the off-campus training industry in China. With the help of these two events, we explored the role of industry-level regulatory policies in shaping and forming organizational culture. This paper adopts a text analysis method, combined with the dimensions of the Denison Organizational Culture Survey (DOCS) and MAXQDA 18 software, to obtain data on corporate culture. Then, the approaches of regression discontinuity in time (RDiT) and regression discontinuity (RD) designs with multiple cutoffs are used to estimate the policy treatment effect. This empirical research suggests that regulatory policies have a significant impact on corporate culture. Moreover, regulatory policies of varying degrees of strictness have differential effects on different dimensions of corporate culture. The research findings contribute to the theories of corporate culture and can guide enterprises to evaluate the impact of policies on corporate culture more clearly, thereby enabling them to make wiser operation decisions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:在住院期间欢迎新孩子的外科学员经常面临与适当育儿假相关的挑战。为了解决这个问题,我们在培训计划中制定了全面的家庭病假政策,并在政策出台前后评估了居民的看法。我们假设这项新的正式政策将增强所有(不仅仅是生育)受训人员的支持感。
    方法:一项基于网络的调查,以评估居民对育儿假的看法,该调查分两次分两次分发给所有普通外科住院医师:政策实施前和政策实施后1年。
    方法:这项研究是在单一机构进行的,学术普通外科住院医师计划。
    方法:纳入该机构的所有普外科住院医师(n=95)。
    结果:95名居民中约有40名(42%)参加了最初的调查,95名居民中有25名(26%)完成了随后的调查。居民报告对政策的满意度从pre到post有了显着改善:pre到68%post,p<0.001,报告政策经常支持学员的需求,20%pre到88%post,p<0.001,认为政策公平。大多数居民(90.0%前和80.0%后)认为怀孕是手术训练期间的风险。父母的居民和非父母的居民对新政策的看法没有差异。
    结论:全面的家庭病假政策的引入改善了所有外科学员(包括非父母)对政策有效性和政策公平性的看法。这与已发表的关于育儿假给其他受训人员带来负担的看法背道而驰。然而,怀孕仍然是新父母个体的压力源。手术计划可以制定支持性的正式家庭病假政策;重要的是要解决手术培训期间围绕育儿的内在系统和文化障碍。
    OBJECTIVE: Surgical trainees who welcome a new child during residency often face challenges related to appropriate parental leave. To address this, we instituted a comprehensive family medical leave policy within our training program and assessed resident perceptions before and after the policy\'s introduction. We hypothesized that this new formal policy would enhance feelings of support amongst all (not just childbearing) trainees.
    METHODS: A web-based survey to gauge resident perceptions on parental leave was distributed to all residents at a single academic general surgery residency at 2 intervals: prior to policy implementation and 1 year after policy implementation.
    METHODS: The study was conducted at a single institution, academic general surgery residency program.
    METHODS: All general surgery residents at the institution were included (n = 95).
    RESULTS: About 40 out of 95 (42%) residents participated in the initial survey and 25 of 95 (26%) completed the subsequent survey. There was a significant improvement in resident reported satisfaction with the policy from pre to post: 15% pre to 68% post, p < 0.001, report the policy frequently supported trainees\' needs, 20% pre to 88% post, p < 0.001, perceived the policy as fair. Most residents (90.0% pre and 80.0% post) perceived pregnancy as a risk during surgical training. There were no differences in perception of the new policy between residents who were parents and residents who were not parents.
    CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of a comprehensive family medical leave policy improved all surgical trainees\' (including nonparents) perception of policy effectiveness and policy fairness. This is counter to the published perception that parental leave creates a burden on fellow trainees. However, pregnancy remains a stressor for the individual new parent. Surgical programs can develop supportive formal family medical leave policies; it is important to address the inherent systemic and cultural barriers surrounding childrearing during surgical training.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:无数的联邦,state,和组织政策旨在改善基于证据的医疗保健,但是这些政策的影响可能会有所不同,重新解释,以及在整个实施过程中对政策要求的遵守不力。加强执行和遵守政策意图的战略可以改善人口健康。严格评估实施卫生政策及其相关卫生服务的多层次环境对于设计有效的政策层面实施战略至关重要。加州通过了2019年的健康保险福利授权,要求为因医疗而有不孕风险的个人提供生育力保护服务。以改善对否则成本过高的服务的获取。我们的目标是记录和理解多层次的环境,关系,以及使用国家福利授权来促进患者获得生育保护服务的活动。
    方法:我们进行了混合方法研究,并使用了政策优化的探索,准备,实施,和维持(EPIS)框架,以分析加利福尼亚州在州保险监管机构及其之间的生育力保护福利任务(SB600)的实施情况,保险公司,和临床水平。
    结果:审查了17份可公开获得的生育力保护受益授权相关文件。采访了四家保险公司;25家财务公司,行政,来自16个肿瘤和生育诊所的提供者参与者;三名生育药物代表;和两名患者倡导者。授权和保险监管机构的指导意见代表了两个“大P”(系统级别)政策,这些政策导致了监管机构之间的一系列“小P”(组织)政策,保险公司,诊所,和病人。许多很少的p政策是支持各级实施和生育保护服务获取的桥梁因素。表征任务的功能(即,政策目标)和形式(即,制定政策的方式)导致确定(1)有意和无意的实施,服务,和患者的结果,(2)按层次和EPIS阶段的实施过程,(3)参与者划定的关键过程和它们之间的异质性,和(4)驱动适应的内部和外部上下文决定因素。
    结论:在中下游实施州健康保险福利授权之后,生成的数据将有助于制定政策层面的实施战略,评估有效实施的决定因素和重要成果,以及未来任务的设计,以提高贴合性和保真度。
    BACKGROUND: A myriad of federal, state, and organizational policies are designed to improve access to evidence-based healthcare, but the impact of these policies likely varies due to contextual determinants of, reinterpretations of, and poor compliance with policy requirements throughout implementation. Strategies enhancing implementation and compliance with policy intent can improve population health. Critically assessing the multi-level environments where health policies and their related health services are implemented is essential to designing effective policy-level implementation strategies. California passed a 2019 health insurance benefit mandate requiring coverage of fertility preservation services for individuals at risk of infertility due to medical treatments, in order to improve access to services that are otherwise cost prohibitive. Our objective was to document and understand the multi-level environment, relationships, and activities involved in using state benefit mandates to facilitate patient access to fertility preservation services.
    METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods study and used the policy-optimized exploration, preparation, implementation, and sustainment (EPIS) framework to analyze the implementation of California\'s fertility preservation benefit mandate (SB 600) at and between the state insurance regulator, insurer, and clinic levels.
    RESULTS: Seventeen publicly available fertility preservation benefit mandate-relevant documents were reviewed. Interviews were conducted with four insurers; 25 financial, administrative, and provider participants from 16 oncology and fertility clinics; three fertility pharmaceutical representatives; and two patient advocates. The mandate and insurance regulator guidance represented two \"Big P\" (system level) policies that gave rise to a host of \"little p\" (organizational) policies by and between the regulator, insurers, clinics, and patients. Many little p policies were bridging factors to support implementation across levels and fertility preservation service access. Characterizing the mandate\'s functions (i.e., policy goals) and forms (i.e., ways that policies were enacted) led to identification of (1) intended and unintended implementation, service, and patient outcomes, (2) implementation processes by level and EPIS phase, (3) actor-delineated key processes and heterogeneity among them, and (4) inner and outer context determinants that drove adaptations.
    CONCLUSIONS: Following the midstream and downstream implementation of a state health insurance benefit mandate, data generated will enable development of policy-level implementation strategies, evaluation of determinants and important outcomes of effective implementation, and design of future mandates to improve fit and fidelity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号